42C13SW8029 S.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE 010

42C13SW8829 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE 010C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part: A: Notes on theory and field procedure

Part: B: Report

1. Introduction

2. Presentation of Results

3. Discussion of Results

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

5. Assessment Details

6. Statement of Cost

7. Certificate

8. Appendix - Small Sources

Part C; Illustrations

Plan Map (in pocket)

IP Data Plots

8 pages

8 pages Page

l

3

4

5

6

7

8

8 pieces

Dwg. No. I.P.P. 4128

Dwg. Nos.IP 5375-1 to -7

:, ; ^,; . IjV.LK'^'"*"i.Ui""'''

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED

KOTES ON THE THEORY, METHOD OF FIELD OPERATION,

AND PRESENTATION OF DATA

FOR THE INDUCED POLARIZATION METHOD

Induced Polarization as a geophysical measurement refers

to the blocking action or polarization of metallic or electronic

conductors in a medium of ionic solution conduction.

This electro-chemical phenomenon occurs wherever

electrical current is passed through an area which contains metallic

minerals such as base metal sulphides. Normally, when current is

passed through the ground, as in resistivity measurements, all of the

conduction takes place through ions present in the water content of the

rock, or soil, i.e. by ionic conduction. This is because almost all

minerals have a much higher specific resistivity than ground water,

The group of minerals commonly described as "metallic", however,

have specific resistivities much lower than ground waters. The

induced polarization effect takes place at those interfaces where the

mode of conduction changes from ionic in the solutions filling the

interstices of the rock to electronic in the metallic minerals present

- 2 -

in the rock.

The blocking action or induced polarization mentioned

above, which depends upon the chemical energies necessary to allow

the ions to give up or receive electrons from the metallic surface,

increases with the time that a d.c. current is allowed to flow through

the rock; i.e. as ions pile up against the metallic interface the

resistance to current flow increases. Eventually, there is enough

polarization in the form of excess ions at the interfaces, to appreciably

reduce the amount of current flow through the metallic particle. This

polarization takes place at each of the infinite number of solution-metal

interfaces in a mineralized rock.

When the d.c. voltage used to create this d.c. current

flow is cut off, the Coulomb forces between the charged ions forming

the polarization cause them to return to their normal position. This

movement of charge creates a small current flow which can be

measured on the surface of the ground as a decaying potential difference.

From an alternate viewpoint it can be seen that if the

direction of the current through the system is reversed repeatedly

before the polarization occurs, the effective resistivity of the system

as a whole will change as the frequency of the switching is changed.

This is a consequence of the fact that the amount of current flowing

through each metallic interface depends upon the length of time that

current has been passing through it in one direction.

- 3 -

The values of the per cent frequency effect or F.E. are

a measurement of the polarization in the rock mass. However, since

the measurement of the degree of polarization is related to the apparent

resistivity of the rock mass it is found that the metal factor values or

M.F. are the most useful values in determining the amount of

polarization present in the rock mass. The MF values are obtained by

normalizing the F.E. values for varying resistivities.

The induced polarization measurement is perhaps the most

powerful geophysical method for the direct detection of metallic

sulphide mineralization, even when this mineralization is of very

low concentration. The lower limit of volume per cent sulphide

necessary to produce a recognizable IP anomaly will vary with the

geometry and geologic environment of the source, and the method of

executing the survey. However, sulphide mineralization of less than

one per cent by volume has been detected by the IP method under

proper geological conditions.

The greatest application of the IP method has been in the

search for disseminated metallic sulphides of less than 207, by volume.

However, it has also been used successfully in the search for massive

sulphides in situations where, due to source geometry, depth of source,

or low resistivity of surface layer, the EM method cannot be successfully

applied. The ability to differentiate ionic conductors, such as water

filled shear zones, makes the IP method a useful tool in checking EM

- A -

anomalies which are suspected of being due to these causes.

In normal field applications the IP method does not

differentiate between the economically important metallic minerals

such as chalcopyrite, chalcocite, molybdenite, galena, etc., and the

other metallic minerals such as pyrite. The induced polarization effect

is due to the total of all electronic conducting minerals in the rock mass.

Other electronic conducting materials which can produce an IP response

are magnetite, pyrolusite, graphite, and some forms of hematite.

In the field procedure, measurements on the surface are

made in a way that allows the effects of lateral changes in the properties

of the ground to be separated from the effects of vertical changes in the

properties. Current is applied to the ground at two points in distance

(X) apart. The potentials are measured at two points (X) feet

apart, in line with the current electrodes is an integer number (n) times

the basic distance (X).

The measurements are made along a surveyed line, with

a constant distance (nX) between the nearest current and potential

electrodes. In most surveys, several traverses are made with various

values of (n); i.e. (n) - 1,2,3,4, etc. The kind of survey required

(detailed or reconnaissance) decides the number of values of (n) used.

In plotting the results, the values of apparent resistivity,

apparent per cent frequency effect, and the apparent metal factor

- 5 -

measured for each set of electrode positions are plotted at the

intersection of grid lines, one from the center point of the current

electrodes and the other from the center point of the potential electrodes.

(See Figure A). The resistivity values are plotted at the top of the data

profile, above the percent frequency effect. On a third line, below the

percent frequency effect, are plotted the values of the metal factor values.

The lateral displacement of a given value is determined by the location

along the survey line of the center point between the current and potential

electrodes. The distance of the value from the line is determined by the

distance (nX) between the current and potential electrodes when the

measurement was made.

The separation between sender and receiver electrodes is

only one factor which determines the depth to which the ground is being

sampled in any particular measurement. The plots then, when contoured,

are not section maps of the electrical properties of the ground under

the survey line. The interpretation of the results from any given survey

must be carried out using the combined experience gained from field

results, model study results and the theoretical investigations. The

position of the electrodes when anomalous values are measured is

important in the interpretation.

In the field procedure, the interval over which the potential

differences are measured is the same as the interval over which the

electrodes are moved after a series of potential readings has been made.

- 6 -

One of the advantages of the induced polarization method is that the

same equipment can be used for both detailed and reconnaissance surveys

merely by changing the distance (X) over which the electrodes are moved

each time. In the past, intervals have been used ranging from 25 feet

to 2000 feet for (X). In each case, the decision as to the distance (X)

and the values of (n) to be used is largely determined by the expected

size of the mineral deposit being sought, the size of the expected anomaly

and the speed with which it is desired to progress.

The diagram in Figure A demonstrates the method used

in plotting the results. Each value of the apparent resistivity, apparent

percent frequency effect, and apparent metal factor effect is plotted and

identified by the position of the four electrodes when the measurement

was made. It can be seen that the values measured for the larger values

of (n) are plotted farther from the line indicating that the thickness of

the layer of the earth that is being tested is greater than for the smaller

values of (n); i.e. the depth of the measurement is increased.

The IP measurement is basically obtained by measuring the

difference in potential or voltage (AV)obtained at two operating

frequencies. The voltage is the product of the current through the ground

and the apparent resistivity of the ground. Therefore in field situations

where the current is very low due to poor electrode contact, or the

apparent resistivity is very low, or a combination of the two effects; the

value, of ( AV ) the change in potential will be too small to be measurable.

The symbol "TL" on the data plots indicates this situation.

- 7 -

In some situations spurious noise, either man made or natural,

will render it impossible to obtain a reading. The symbol "N" on the

data plots indicates a station at which it is too noisy to record a reading.

If a reading can be obtained, but for reasons of noise there is some doubt

as to its accuracy, the reading is bracketed in the data plot ( ).

In certain situations negative values of Apparent Frequency

Effect are recorded. This may be due to the geologic environment or

spurious electrical effects. The actual negative frequency effect value

recorded is indicated on the data plot, however, the symbol "NEC" is

indicated for the corresponding value of Apparent Metal Factor. In

contouring negative values the contour lines are indicated to the nearest

positive value in the immediate vicinity of the negative value.

The symbol "NR" indicates that for some reason the operator

did not attempt to record a reading although normal survey procedures

would suggest that one was required. This may be due to inaccessible

topography or other similar reasons. Any symbol other than those

discussed above is unique to a particular situation and is described within

the body of the report.

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED.

METHOD USED IN PLOTTING DIPOLE-DIPOLE

INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS

Slottont on line

n -

n - 2 -

n - 3 -

n - A ~

x * Electrode spreod length n * E lectrode separation

P P P f f P1,2-3.4 2,1-4,* 5.4-5,6 4,5-6? 5,6-7,6 6,7-6,9

___ P P P P P1,2-4,5 2,3-5,6 3.4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-B,9

________ P P P P 1,2-5,6 2,3-6,7 3.4*7,8 4,5-8,9

__________ P P P1,2-6,7 2,3-7,8 3,4-6,9

Apparent Resistivity

n - l

n - 2

n - 3n - A -

F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E 1,2-3,4 2,3-4,5 3,4-5,6 4,5-6,7 5.6-7JB 6,7-8,9

___ F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E1,2-4,5 2.3-5,6 3,4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9

______ F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. * . -1,2-5,6 2,3-6.7 3,4-7,8 4,5-8,9 Apparent Percent

_______ F.E. F.E. F.E. Frequency Effect1,2-6,7 2,3-7,8 3,4-8,9

n - l -

n - 2 -

n - 3 -

n - A ~

M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. 1,2-3,4 2,3-4,5 3,4-5,6 4,5-6? 5,6-7,8 6,7-8,9

___ M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F.1,2-4,5 2,3-5,6 3,4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9

_______ M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. 1,2-5,6 2,3-6,7 3,4-7,8 4,5-8,9

_________ M.F. M.F. M.F. 1,2-6,7 2i3-7,8 3,4-8,9

Apparent Metal Factor

Fig. A

REPORT ON THE

RECONNAISSANCE INDUCED POLARIZATION

AND RESISTIVITY SURVEY

ON

A PORTION OF A CLAIM GROUP

WABIKOBA LAKE AREA

DISTRICT OF THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO

FOR

HEMLO EXPLORATIONS LIMITED

1. INTRODUCTION

At the request of Orequest Consultants, we have completed a

reconnaissance induced polarization and resistivity survey on a grid

covering a portion of a claim group in the Wabikoba Lake area of

Ontario. The area of interest is located within the Thunder Bay Mining

District, and is controlled by Hemlo Explorations Limited.

The area is of interest because of several gold discoveries to the

southwest. In the Hemlo Area, the gold is contained within disseminated

sulphide mineralization. The weakly disseminated, metallic sulphide

zones occur within any of several types of metamorphic rocks (schists,

quartzites, volcanics, etc.). The background IP effects in the general

Hemlo Area are low in magnitude; this must be due to the low level of

metallic minerals (pyrite, magnetite, etc.) in the country rocks.

*- 9

The IP anomalies from the gold-bearing sulphide zones vary from low

In magnitude to quite strong. The sulphide concentrations within the

ore zones varies considerably; however, the anomalies detected are often

quite definite due to the low background. The interpretation is also

often aided by the fact that the overburden is relatively thin in many

areas. This means that any bedrock sources of IP effect will be

"shallow" in the reconnaissance survey; i.e., they will be anomalous for

the n ~ l measurement.

The IP results shown in Figure l to Figure 6 were measured over a

typical gold-bearing sulphide zone in the Hemlo Area. It can be seen

that the IP anomalies measured are low to moderate in magnitude. There

may or may not be a region of lower apparent resistivities associated

with the IP anomaly. However, there is almost certainly not enough

mineralization present to cause these low resistivities; the low

resistivities where they are present, are perhaps due to porosity

changes in the host rocks, caused by shearing, fracturing, alteration,

etc.

The IP data we have enclosed from the Hemlo Area was measured using

X z 50 meters, Y. = 25 meters and X ~ 1 5 meters. With these short

electrode intervals, the n ~ l measurement is anomalous; i.e. the source

is shallow. However, in a reconnaissance survey the electrode interval

used is sometimes greater. It must be kept firmly in mind (see Appendix

to this report) that if a large electrode interval is used to detect a

narrow source, the magnitude of the apparent IP anomaly will be reduced.

In order to better locate, and evaluate, the source of a narrow, shallow

anomaly detailed measurements with shorter electrode intervals must be

completed. (See Appendix).

LIME - 118E X-2511 PHO (.OHM-H 1

eecs 000 il ? 16 l fr l JO l M

4 M? 5...liTT ERPRETRTIOH

.460. g... ...3? e. s..-4———————*-

N. iN*2

M*3

N -4

M-5

H* 6

s/ 101V \7104 " / \ ;,10K/ 7934) 6520

.X 1371 I467';S\VK16"74187341

^2714 2058 s 4592^ 5929 /'8474

M-l

H'2

N'3

N"4

N-5

DUG HO.-I P- FIG. l

H. W. ONTflRIO GOLD EXPLORRTIOHGOLD H1TH DISSEMJNRTEO SULPHIDES

III HRRP.OU ZONES

LINE NO .-118E

LINE - 1 1 8 E

blFOLE NUMBER 1COORD1MRTE 600 1

x-zsN rnnsE ^l,OH^>i 1 3 141*. If i

55PS 500 J 4507 18 19110111

S- 400S 350?1 1 't

INTERPRETftTIOII ,

N * 1 19 \x9j--X

M, 3 17 yH' 4 13

N. 5

H -e

^^J^^7' rc V'X X-F\^/^ 21 /^55 ^ \ 4o14x^^21 /' *f N 55 JttV

X'' x 3i 42 4* 4ft 45

^4^-1^4^'•\N If "\ 13 \15

3? X\\ 19 \ 13

37^ N 17 x 14

N-l -

N*2 -

M* 3 -

N-4 -

N-5 -

H. f.-

*— X —i -(IX- —V— x —^

r-( r-\

PLOTTING POINT —— X-25M

SURFRCE PROJECTION OF FtNOMRLOUS ZONE

DEFINITE PROPflBLE POSSIBLE

T ) NRRROU7 S RESISTIUI TVV ) LOMS

ZONE A

DIPOLELINE - I16E K-25H HETRL FflCTOP.

NUHBEF- 1 i \ 3 1 4 S \ t 7 16 9 16" Til TIT-.COORQINRTE CC'Of 5501 50PS 4505. 400S. 350S

1HTEPFH*l

11-2

N-3

M* 4

•N"5

N" 6

RE T RT ION , , , ^HHMMHIHI, ( | r ( (.4 .1 .07 .08 . 3*1 \s6.9 \\ 3///1 .2 .0^ .2 N*l -

/VI \ ^ \\ ( li \ •J .1 .06 .gy^'^.3 Q, 9.7y)[{. 1.1) .J .2 J N-2 -

X^' i ^ ——— ' I'^v ( .1 .05 .2 //f 2.6) 4 3.4;,\A.e .3 .2 N^3-/7 \ i /•--zr^ ^^

.1 .1 "16 \ ' 3.9 ' 'l.?^- 2.2 VNx .5 .2 .5 N-4 -

N-5 -

n*e .

FREPUEHCV ?HERT2) l .C H2 .

NOTE- CONTOURS RT LOGflRITHMIC INTERUfiLS. l ,-l .5 -i , - 3,-5.-7 5.-IB

DRTE SURVEYED'1963 RPPROVED

DflTE.

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD

INDUCED POLRRtZRTION

RNO RESISTIVITY SURVEY

L INf

'M F Vi E NllhBEf.COORDINATE .INTEPFREIFtTU

M- l PI'

H* i

11*4

N '5

M* 6

- 1 1 8 E X ' 1 S M

1 i 1 3 1 4 1 5 1Ec'OS 4985 4SOS .li ^Tf r,?l4 s 3l?1..^ftlf. ryj5l7jpvf.393 f

rC33 51?9^V433 \254 (,V\^14O\5934

~~~\ w * Y — ~-'* - ̂ V ^ \ S-

^"aKoVsW^'e? C 73^792

'o^^Tw^- 7?A^nT

P H C ( 0 H M - M .'

617144305

253/ \IPK H * 1 -

/' 9719 H*2 -

N'4 -

N-5 -

H, 6-

DUG. NO. -t P r FIG. 2

H. W. ONTRRIO GOLD EXPLORRTIOHSOLO WITH DISSEMINATED S ULPHIDES

IN NRRROM ZONES

LINE HO .-l 18E DETAIL

D I P Q L E

L I HE

NiJMBEFCOORDINRTE

..INTEP.r-FH"l

H'l

11*7

N-4

N-5

H- 6

CI.Fll 10

P.?

- 1 18E

1 i 1 .3.Si-OS 4301

1

-J;K'\51 7 ?7.2^'/ 44 } 63

3? ^ 56 5C-: \

4F: s v 54^

47 \ fi

y,* I SM

14 1 E 14 COS

v \ *y \66 -5C/ f, 24

64 ( 38 \

5? 5f ^ 35, ____ ,

- 4P ~- 53

p H R s E '.i OH:,'

f 1 i1 164 3 OS

V 13 \\6.1 N* l -

\\13 H. g-

2? 11 = 3-

0 = 4 -

H " 5 -

11 = 6-

<— X —X- -NX- -x— x — y

ffiPLOTTINGPOINT — X-15M

SUPFRCE PROJECTION OF flNOMflLOUS ZONE

DEFINITE mmmmmmm T ) NRRROUPPOFjflPLE i iiiiiiiit V ) R ESI ST l VI TYPOSSIBLE ***** V) LOWS

ZONE ALIME - 118E

'b'lF&LE NUHBEf- 1 i 1 SCOORDINRTE E i 0 c 4 90S

X'l 5M

1 4 1 t 14 6 0 S

METRL FRCTOR

4 1 fr le4 3 0 S

INTEFPPElflf I OH , ••"Wn** II II II

H-l .1 .E \M*jfY21•i *2 .1 -ey^ '" }\"• 3 - 11 ^"^je.H '4 I.ft VV'v 1, 8.4

11*5 4.7"^ 5.4

H. 6

/^\V^s626 ^^2,3 y\ .4

ilJl^/is' 1/9 f ,-^7 ] \\' f~ —— --^ 4.r

6.6 ''-* .4

•i' .0? N . 1 -

.1 N-2-

.3 .1 = 3-

11*4'

N"5 -

11 = 6 -

FREPUEHCY (HERTZ) l O HZ

NOTE- CONTOURS RT LOCRRITHMIC 1NTERVRLS. 1.-15 -2,-3,-5,-7.S.-10

DRTE SURVEYED '1993 RPPROVED

DOTE.

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTDINDUCED POLflRIZflTION

RND RESISTIVITY SURVEY

LIHE - 120H X-50M RHO (OHH-M)

PJPOLE NUMBERCOORDINRTE 250S

N-l 3757 l s\ 12

H- 2 5184\

H" 3 20?

H. 4

H- 3

H* 6

121314151*1716150s sos sen

^r i i( \8140 XV4370/V *2K 331, H" 1 -

O^V 14K 12K^s^500 N " 3 -

6650^ -^ST" IBK N-4-

N-5 -

N.6-

DUG HO . - I . P - FIG. 3

H.W. OHTRRIO GOLD EXPLORRTIONGOLD HITH DISSEMINATED SULPHIDES

IN NfiRROW ZONES

LIKE NO .-120W

L I HE - 126W X-50M

DJPOLf NUMBER 12 1 7 14 I t. ...J-iOORDlRRTE 250 i 1 1.8 S 50S

1NTERPRETRTIOH , , , , ,N ' 1 24 v^xg.?// \20 2f. \ 18 \ \6.S

N*2 20 ^-^^l^ 24 27 \ 16

N ' 3 34 \^ 25 27 27

H- 4 38 \ 25 28N-5

N-6

PHHSE C 1 OHT )

e 1.7 ..i.....e...sen

N-2 -

N o 3 -

HM-

H- 5 -

H* f. -

PLOTTING POINT X-5BM

SURFfiCE PROJECTION OF RHOMflLOUS ZONE

DEFINITE PROEfiPLE POSSIBLE

T ) NRRROW7 ) R ESISTIVITYV) LOWS

ZONE B

LIHE - 120W X-50M

_D IP OLE NUMBER 1 Z I 3 I 4 I E^OORPINRTE E50t 150S 50S

7'V'W'*. , piling fH - 1 .6 .09 .2 .6 .04 .03

N*2 .4 .1 .Z- .4 .03

H- 3 1^) -2 .2 .3

N*4 .f .2 .2

H- 5

H -6

METRL FRCTOF1

617 i 6SOU

H" 1 -

H- 2 -

H- 4 -

N-5 -

FREQUENCY (HERTZ) 1.0 HZ.

NOTE- CONTOURS flT LOGflRlTHMIC INTEPVflLS l.-l J -2.-?.-5.-7 .S,-l O

DflTE SURVEYED'1983 RPPROVED

DflTE.

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTDINDUCED POLRRI2RTION

fi N D RESISTIVITY SURVEY

LINE - 128W

DIPOLE NjMBER 12 13 1 4

X-25M RHC' COHM-M)

15161*1619 10 1 11 l i...50S 100S 50S B

———— \JL- ——————— , ——— , ——— , ——— *-^-H ——————— i ——— , ——————— i ——— i ———11*1 8216 8687 8021 B2f5 \v3323/^' 1435^^5* 1™ "^f^S^L-J*^ M*''

M* 2 3612\S^10K^ 9764-^'l8K N\~UX x^ ̂ 304,-^ O20B^i 38K 43K "Xc-.lSKX'" 261. 14 = 2-

N-3 299^ 4331N^s950GX/' 19K leK^^^Tj^SOs) /6935^v31K ^54K \^I4K /^SSK N*3-

N*4 3596 3826^'' 17K 19K •''7435 6363^ 44?jN 6650^'-'- 37t: x 57K 541' N*4

N-5 H"5

H * f N ' f

LINE - 12BW

C'TPOLE NUMBtP 1213 4COORPIMRTE ZEDS 280E

X-25M PHRSE t 1 . OHZ f

15 16 17 16 19 110111 liI50S 100S 50i 0

JNTERPpETRTJON , , , . . . . . . . .N-l 14 \v7.3 6.3 (..A// 1 4

N - 3 25 23\ ( 10V.^B.5/ /16 /' 24

H- 4 21-^19 15s 14 ^ ^ 24

N-5

n*e

24 2S 20^ 17 ^^^l^-" 7.5 N-2 -

20 <[3F> k 1? - 1 8 ^ 11 10 N'3

23 23 28 ^ 1? 18 17 N*4

II"?

H -f.

ZONE B

LINE - 120W

MP-OlE ^UMBtP 1 l 1 ? 4

iiiiiiiiinii iTili.., ___ ,

X*25M METflL FRCTOR

1 5 1 f 1 7 1 i 1 9 1 10 1 11 12-150? 1005- SOS 0

H *l ^ .08 .08 .08 .4 //I2.3/// .06 .07 .2 .2 tl*l -

H . N . 0 H T Fi R I 0 GOLDGOLD WITH DISSEM INRTED

I H H ft P R 0 W ZONE

LIME NO . -1201'

t — x — x ——— H y ———

TI rn•^ v, V '

PLOTTING vv ^'POINT ———————— ̂ x

EXPLORRTIOHSULPHIDES

DETAIL

r0!s

X-25M

E.URFRCE PROJECTION OF RNOMRLOUS ZONE

DEFINITE — mi . i T) NflRROU

POSSIBLE **.'*.*i^ V \ L OWS

FREQUENCY (HERTZ) DRTE SURVEYED ' 1 983 IOHJ RPPROVED

NOTE- CONTOURS

INTERVRLS 1 , - l . 5 -2, -3, -5. -7. 5, -10 DRTE

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.

INDUCED POLRPIZRTION

RIIP RESIST1 VI TY SURVEY

LINE - 302W X-50M RHO (OHM-M)

PI r o i E 'COORDlHfiTE.

mx ? i * i se? se?

H.lH-'

N-3

N-4

M-I

H-f

9384

DUG HO - I P - FIG. 5

H. W. ONTRRIQ GOLD EXPLORflTIOHGOLD NITH DISSEMIHfUED SULPHIDES

IN HfiRROIJ ZONES

LINE NO.-3D2W

LINE - 3C2W

DIPOLE NUMBER I. i 13 1COORDINPTE 350S 2565INTERPRETATION , , ,

N-l 11 xx 20 -xXi* /' 'V \x

N-2 24 26 X 16 7 12

N-3 2? 27 XS^/X

N-4 31 3?N 23

N-5

N-6

X-50M PHASE (1

4 1 i 1 1? 1 f"

i50s ses^X H// 40 V̂ 13

——J1//' ̂ 38 ^^ 32

'IF 26 24

x 33 ^ 25

OH;;.g

H M -

N-2 -

N"3-

N-5 -

N-6 '

ZONE C

<— x —x- -N X- -X—X—^^

LINE - 302U

DIPOLE NUMBER . ,. . .1.2 1 3COORDINATE 350E 250i

X-50M METfiL FflCTOP

14151(17 t1 5 8 f 5 0 S

INTERPRETATION , . fMKMMBriN-l .1 .3 .3 .2

N-i .1 .6 .3

N-3 .2 .4 .1

N-4 .2 .3

N-5

N-6

.06 .2 .9 .08 H - 1 -

.1 .93 .f. ,5 H * 2 '

.2 .3 .3 N ' 3 -

.2 .4 . e: N '4 -

N ^ f -

jTi ri J,

PLOTT1MC POINT

SUPFFiCE PROJECT10H OF ftMOMflUOUS ZOHE

PEF1HITE PF'OBftBLE POSSIBLE

HfiRROMRESISTIVITY

LOWS

FREQUENCY (HEPTZ) l , 6 HZ

NOTE- CONTOURS RT LOCflRITHMIC INTERVRLS l,-l.5

PflTE SURVEYED-1983 RPPROVED

DfiTE.

P H O E H I X GE O P H Y S I C S LTD

INDUCED POLRRIZflTIOH

ftNP RESISTIVITY SURVEY

LINE - 302H X-25N RHO (OHM-M)

fjf6LE NuhBEft 1 J .: S 4 1 S t' l 7 l e l ...s .CbORDlNRTE 17SS 125S 75S 55S........ ..2.5.)!.....

N-l V I52E/ 4290 3202 v52?S,'T 448? \5?f8,'\ \ Vr 1 3K \s If 1 N*l -

N-2 38 18 /' "730 L/^ 11K I;^4574 3496 4336) *, 923 1) SlsiN^MK N-2-

N-3 2299 S ^7333/y'TeK 15K5jVSe44 2895) 437J \^ 1 1K \,16K N*3-~ \ fl/ f — -N y/ ^V l ^ Vv

N'43848 4572^*' 17k ' 22K^''8595XSX 2227 '3''44 x 53?e xX IIK N-4 -

N-5 N-5-

N - f N - 6

LINE - 302W X-25M PHREE (l.BHt)

DI P OLE NUMBER 12 3 4 15 It 17 IE 1?COORD1NRTE 175S 125E 75S 25S Cf.N1N1EPPF.ETRT10N 11111111

N - 1 4.9/ 6.8 \7.7 *-\//' 4 e \ 24 V lf'r-.'T X '3 N * ' '

N'2 16 '^ ̂ 6.2 /^l-fx/V 9-5^ X30 49 \2? \^13 14 N-2-

N"3 1 ? / H )\VL/' ̂ X^ 28/ 37 47 \ s? \\ 12 N* 3

N-4 20V ^ 12 '9.2^ TT ^22 '36 34 41 ^ El N"4

N-5 N-5

N " 6 N * 6

ZONE CLINE - 302W X-25M METRL FRCTOR

DIPOLE NUMBER 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 S 1 b [ 7 1 6 1 9COORDlMflTE 175E I25S 75E 25S 2SNINTEPPRETRT10H , , 111)111111^1111 , , , ,

"•1 .3 .2 .2 .2 .9 .4 .1 .1 .06 N*l

N-2 .4 .08 .02 .2 .9 X^"l?T} .3 .09 .1 N-2

N-3 .7 .2 .02 .04 -(T!l 1.3 f .9 .2 .68 14 = 3

N-4 .5 .3 .05 .03 .3 \ '"iJT 1̂ 1 s- .7 .2 N-4

N-5 H . 5

N - 6 H - f

H . W . 0 N T fi R I 0 GOLD E X P L 0 R n T I 0 HCOLD WITH 01SSEM1HRTED SULPHIDES

IN M R R R 0 M ZONES

LINE HO.-302H DETAIL

< — x — X ————— N X ————— X — X — ' )

r~i Mi — ) f — ' ̂ s"!Tl Ti v v

X y-V X

x x V ^

PLOTTING "^ x x POINT y x X-25M

SURFRCE PROJECTION OF RNOMRLOUS ZONE

DEFINITE i T) NRRROU

POSSIBLE ****.* V ) L OWS

FREOUENCY (HERTZJ DRTE SURUE YEO ' l 9S3 10 H Z RPPROVED

NOTE- CONTOURSRT LOGRR1THM1C ————————————————————— INTERORLS 1,-1 5 -2.-3.-5.-7 . S.-lfl nflTF

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.

INDUCED POLflRI2flTION

RND RESIST I U ITY SURVEY

3

On the Hemlo Explorations Limited Claim Group in the Wabikoba Lake

Area, a previously completed V.L.F. Radio EM survey has outlined several

definite conductors. The reconnaissance induced polarization and

resistivity survey was planned to locate any zones of metallic

mineralization that might correlate with the conductors detected.

2. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

The reconnaissance induced polarization and resistivity results are

shown on the following enclosed data plots. The results have been

plotted using the pseudo-section format.

Line Electrode Intervals Dwg.No.

24W 150' IP 5375-1

16W 150' IP 5375-2

0+00 150' IP 5375-3

8E 150' ' IP 5375-4

16E 150' IP "5375-5

24E 150' IP 5375-6

32E 150' IP 5375-7

Also enclosed with this report is Dwg. I.P.P.4128, a plan map of

the Wabikoba Lake Grid at a scale of l" = 400'. The definite, probable

and possible Induced Polarization anomalies are indicated by bars, in

the manners shown on the legend, on this plan map as well as on the data

plots. These bars represent the surface projection of the anomalous

zones as interpreted from the location of the transmitter and receiver

electrodes when the anomalous values were measured.

Since the Induced Polarization measurement is essentially an

averaging process, as are all potential methods, it is frequently

difficult to exactly pinpoint the source of an anomaly. Certainly, no

- A -

anomaly can be located with more accuracy than the electrode interval

length; i.e. when using 150" electrode intervals the position of a

narrow sulphide body can only be determined to lie between two stations

150' apart. In order to definitely locate, and fully evaluate, a

narrow, shallow source it is necessary to use shorter electrode

intervals. In order to locate sources at some depth, larger electrode

intervals must be used, with a corresponding increase in the

uncertainties of location. Therefore, while the centre of the indicated

anomaly probably corresponds fairly well with source, the length of the

indicated anomaly along the line should not be taken to represent the

exact edges of the anomalous material.

The topographic information shown on Dwg. I.P.P. 4128 has been

taken from maps made available by the staff of Orequest Consultants Ltd.

3. DTSCUSSION OF RESULTS

The reconnaissance IP and resistivity results show almost no IP

effects associated with the V.L.F. Radio EM conductor previously

detected. However, in all cases there is a definite resistivity low

that correlates with the electromagnetic conductor. Two types of

resistivity lows can be seen on Line 8E. At 2+OOS there is a narrow

resistivity low, with a considerable depth extent; this porous fracture

may be a fault or shear zone in the basement rocks. The anomaly at

about 14+50N to 16+OON lies at the northern edge of a near-surface

resistivity low that is probably due to an increased thickness of

conductive overburden.

There are only a few locations where a very weak, narrow shallow

anomaly has been interpreted from the reconnaissance induced

- 5 -

polarization data. These have been indicated on the data plots and the

plan map.

A. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The sources of the V.L.F. Radio EM conductors previously located

have been confirmed by the resistivity measurements. The zones of

increased conductivity are due to increased porosity. There is no IP

effect associated with the majority of the conductors.

There are a very few, very weak, narrow shallow IP effects

interpreted on the data plots. The most definite are on

Line 0+00, 3+50N and Line 0+00, 38+OON. As outlined in the Appendix to

this report, the sources of these anomalies can be better located, and

evaluated, only by making measurements with shorter electrode intervals.

If the anomalies are confirmed, closely spaced parallel lines should

also be surveyed.

With this detailed data available, a drill test can be planned, if

the source is not known.

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED,

Philip G. ttadlof, Ph.D., P Geophysicist

Dated: April 23, 1984

- 6 -

ASSESSMENT DETAILS

PROPERTY: Wabikoba Lake Area

SPONSOR: Hemlo Explorations Ltd.

LOCATION: Hemlo Area

TYPE OF SURVEY: Induced Polarization And Resistivity

OPERATING MAN DAYS:

EQUIVALENT 8 HR. MAN DAYS:

CONSULTING MAN DAYS'.

DRAFTING MAN DAYS:

TOTAL MAN DAYS:

MINING DIVISION: Thunder Bay

PROVINCE: Ontario

25.0 DATE STARTED: March l, 1984

37.5 DATE FINISHED: March 18, 1984

3.0 NUMBER OF STATIONS: 184

5.0 NUMBER OF READINGS: 2,190

45.5 MILES OF LINE SURVEYED: 5.03

CONSULTANTS:

Philip G. Hallof, 3505 - 2045 Lakeshore Blvd.W., Toronto, Ontario

FIELD TECHNICIANS:

G. Mullan, P.O. Box 72, R.R.//l, Hudson, P.Q.S. Van Der Vecht, 30 Grovetree Crescent, Rexdale, Ontario

Extra Labourers

S. Jolliffe, 24 Pine Ave. E., Montreal, QuebecC. Constantineau, P.O. Box 201, White River, Ontario

CARTOGRAPHERS:

R.C. Norris, 2499 Linwood Street, Pickering, Ontario M.W. Reh, 58 Crossbow Crescent, Willowdale, Ontario

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED

Philip G. Geophysicist

, Ph.D., P

Dated: April 23, 1984

- 7 -

STATEMENT OF COST

Orequest Consultants Ltd. - IP Survey Hemlo Area of Ontario

CREW: G. Mullan - S. Van Der Vecht - S. Jolliffe C. Constantineau

PERIOD: March 1-18, 1984

Operating days 3 Bad Weather i Standby l Off

, days

@ $l,125.00/day

@ $

$14,062.50

2,712.50

N.C.

$16,775.00

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED

Philip G. tUdlof, Ph.D., P Geophysicist

Dated: April 23, 1984

- 8 -

CERTIFICATE

l, Philip G. Hallof, of the City of Toronto, do hereby certify

that:

1. I am a geophysicist residing at Suite 3505, 2045 Lakeshore

Blvd., W. Toronto, Ontario.

2. I am a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

with a B.Se. Degree (1952) in Geology and Geophysics, and a Ph.D. Degree

(1957) in Geophysics.

3. I am a member of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists and

the European Association of the Exploration Geophysicists.

4. I am a Professional Geophysicist, registered in the Province of

Ontario, The Province of British Columbia and The State of Arizona.

5. I have no direct or indirect interest, nor do I expect to

receive any interest directly or indirectly, in the properties or

securities of Hemlo Explorations Limited, or any affiliate.

6. The statements made in this report are based on a study of

published geological literature and unpublished private reports.

7. Permission is granted to use in whole or in part for assessment

and qualification requirements but not for advertising purposes.

Dated at Toronto

This 23rd day of April, 1984

Philip G. Hallof, Ph.D.

PHOENIX Geophysics Limited

APPENDIX

THE INTERPRETATION OF

INDUCED POLARIZATION ANOMALIES

FROM RELATIVELY SMALL SOURCES

The induced polarization method was originally developed to detect disseminated sulphides and has proven to be very successful in the search for "porphyry copper" deposits. In recent years we have found that the. IP method can also be very useful in exploring for more concentrated deposits of limited size. This type of source gives sharp IP anomalies that are often difficult to interpret.

The anomalous patterns that develop on the contoured data plots will depend on the size, depth and position of the source and the relative size of the electrode interval. The data plots are not sections showing the electrical parameters of the ground. When the electrode interval (X) is appreciably greater than the width of the source, a large volume of unmineralized rock is averaged into each measurement. This is particularly true for the large values of the electrode separation (n).

The theoretical scale model results shown in Figure l and Figure 2 indicate the effect of depth. If the depth to the top of the source is small compared to the electrode interval (i.e. d X) the measure ment for n - l will be anomalous. In Figure l the depth is 0.5 units (X = 1.0 units) and the n = l value is definitely anomalous; the pattern on the contoured data plot is typical for a relatively shallow, narrow, near- vertical tabular source. The results in Figure 2 are for the same source with the depth increased to 1.5 units. Here the n = l value is not anomalous; the larger values of (n) are anomalous but the magnitudes are much lower than for the source at less depth.

When the electrode interval is greater than the width of the source, it is not possible to determine its width or exact position between the electrodes. The true IP effect within the source i s a lso indeterminate; the anomaly from a very narrow source with a very large true IP effect will be much the same as that from a zone with twice the width and i the true IP effect. The theoretical scale model data shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4 demonstrate this problem. The depth and position of the source are unchanged but the width and true IP effect are varied. The anomalous patterns and magnitudes are essentially the same, hence the data are in sufficient to evaluate the source completely.

The normal practise is to indicate the IP anomalies by solid, broken, or dashed bars, depending upon their degree of distinctiveness. These bars represent the surface projection of the anomalous zones as inter preted from the location of the transmitter and receiver electrodes when the anomalous values were measured. As illustrated in Figure l, Figure 2 Figure. 3 and Figure 4, no anomaly can be located with more accuracy than the spread length. While the centre of the solid bar indicating the anomaly corresponds fairly well with the source, the length of the bar should not be taken to represent the exact edges of the anomalous material.

- 2 -

If the source is shallow, the anomaly can be better evaluatedusing a shorter electrode interval. When the electrode interval used approaches the width of the source, the apparent effects measured will be nearly equal to the true effects within the source. When there is some depth to the top of the source, it is not possible to use electrode intervals that are much less than the depth to the source. In this situation, one must realize that a definite ambiguity exists regarding the width of the source and the IP effect within the source.

Our experience has confirmed the desirability of doing detail. When a reconnaissance IP survey using a relatively large electrode interval indicates the presence of a narrow, shallow source, detail with shorter electrode intervals is necessary in order to better locate, and evaluate, the source. The data of most usefulness is obtained when the maximum apparent IP effect is measured for n ** 2 or n - 3 . For instance, an anomaly orginally located using X = 300' may be checked with X = 200' and then X - 1 00'. The data with X ~ 1 00' will be quite different from the original reconnais sance results with X = 300".

The data shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 are field results from a greenstone area in Quebec. The expected sources were narrow (less than 30" in width) zones of massive, high-grade, zinc-silver ore. An electrode interval of 200' was used for the reconnaissance survey in order to keep the rate of progress at an acceptable level. The anomalies located were low in magnitude.

The very weak, shallow anomaly shown in Figure 5 is typical of those located by the X - 200' reconnaissance survey. Several anomalies of this type were detailed using shorter electrode intervals. In most cases the detail measurements suggested broad zones of very weak minerali zation. However, in the case of the source at 20N to 22N, the measurements with shorter electrode intervals confirmed the presence of a strong, narrow source. The X = 5 0' results are shown in Figure 6. Subsequent drilling has shown the source to be 12.5' of massive sulphide mineralization con taining significant zinc and silver values.

The change in the anomaly that results when the electrodeinterval is reduced is not unusual. The X = 50' data more accurately locates the narrow source, and permits the geophysicist to make a better evaluation of its importance. The completion of this type of detail is very important, in order to get the maximum usefulness from a reconnaissance IP survey.

Theoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies

Scale Model Cases

13 l i l l . l J It M 11 13 H II tt t j II 1]

K . II It X l f.l I.I li II li /I.I

II

II II

(P/Z TT) o

11 l l l S l l l l It II li l] II 11 K 17 II It

(f*)o

II 11 1 \ l 7 l l n I I H 11 11 15 II 11 II 11

l l l

(Mf)o

li n n i) n D li IT 11 it

(Mf) - O

Ufcittff o*ri*4M*r*w

2-51

(Mf) 2- OOOO

t f C ) O * 25 X

IHtrtfW Mwr

7

CASE . g-O-5-BU-IO-o

Theoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies

Scale Model Cases

i i 11 i ie M ii n n is n D n it

II II 11 l.T I.I I.I I.I I.I 1.1 \ II II II

CI II ( ! l l l t II 11 11 13 n IS II It II II

(ft)o

t l l 3 t ! l l l ) H II 11 13 H IS II 11 II 11

(Mf)o

n li n n it K n i) n

(Mf) . O (Mf) g* 9250

(ft) 2*l

KfllM HKT

•i * i ' i ' ;

CASE B-^S-BU-IO-o

THEORETICAL INDUCED POLARIZATION

AND

RESISTIVITY STUDIES

SCALE MODEL CASE

PLAN V IEW

10 H 12 l? 14 l *,

K) ; l?

•- l -*-*- n* -**- x

(vX .-(T;

X x \

X EQUALS l UNIT

n-i- n-2- n-3-

•W 10X) 10

10 10 10

n-4 K) K) 10

97 86 97 \IO tO tO

95 87 87 95 N. 10 10 10

68 89 68 *V\IO 10 10

88 90 90 88 92 \ 10 10 10

89 K) II 12 13 14 15 16

n-4—O -03 -06

B 9 10 l! g 14 l? IS

n-4 O -30 -59

89 10 I.I 12 13 14 15 16

(P2ir\ - 10

(Mf), -O {Mf ) 2 * 1 1700 (Fe)2 * 30'^

DEPTH EXTENT OF SOURCEi 4 UNITS

FIG.3

THEORETICAL NDUCED POLARIZATION

AND

RESISTIVITY STUDIES

SCALE MODEL CASE

PLAN VIEW

O M 'g

t B n i4

x -~~~ n x

X EQUALS l UNIT

n -i K) 10K) K)

99 93 99 V 10 tO 10

97 91 . 91 97N. to 10 109-2 92 92 9 7\. 10 10 10

J6\ 10 10 K),o'0 ,o 96 9.3 9 3 9 3 93

9 10 II lg 13 14 K 16

n -4—0 O -O7 ' 08

(Fe)o35 \\\0 -03 O O

-08 O O

45 4*\X\05 -08 O O

42^,07 -07 O O

10 II 12 13 14 15 '__16

n .4 O O -70 83

S 6 7 B 9 ' Ip I.I 12 13 14 15 16

\ MO

(Mf)| -O ' 228OO

— I-

OCPTH EXTENT OF SOURCE 4 UNITS

FIG 4

INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS

BATCHELOR LAKE AREA, QUEBEC. .

INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS

BATCHELOR LAKE AREA, QUEBEC.

U80// 4040 l 6170 6000yV l lTOO S I 3J01

•J—1500 f ./4800. mo l /7600 J //ZOSO J//BOO XXV3T20\\\~ 12000

ON I2N I4N ' I6N I8N 20N ' 22N ' 24N 26N 2BN^ x f f f f

• l — 0-13 O-ll 0-M O 0-S9 M ''IVX/ 0-1 O 0-1

.1————0'57 0-19 0-18 t 0 -2 O'BB 0-76 O 0-1

.3————————O'SI '0-1 ^22 0-2* 0-6* 0-12 O(M. F.) i

I9N 20 N 2IN 22N 23 N

Ml

ON I2N I4N 16N ION 20N ' 22N ' 24N 26N 28N

(Rr.it

23N

"•l-1-7 1*6 V t'l 4 -3 0-24 0-1

ION I2N 14N I6N - I6N 20N 22N 24N 26N 28N

MASSIVE SULPHIDE

ZONE

2-t S 4 -8 4-9 /^ J-t

I9N 20N 2IN 22N 23N

GLACIAL OVERBURDEN

MASSIVE SULPHIDE ZONE *~~

FIG.5

GREENSTONE

FIG. 6

tario

Ministry of Natural ResourcesGEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL

TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

FUe.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) INDUCED POLARIZATION 6 RESISTIVITY

Township o Claim Holde

Survey Com

Author of F

Address of j

Covering Da

Total Miles

r Area WABIKOBA LAKE AREA G 620

,r / v HEMLO EXPLORATIONS LTD. -'w ———————————————————————————————————

pany PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS T .TO.

.eporl PHOENIX fiF.OPHYRir.R T .TT).

. , 200 YORKLAND BLVD., WILLOWDALE, ONTARIO \iithor * *

ites of Surve

of Line Cut

.v 01/03/84 to 18/03/84-y- ——————————————————————

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

^^NTER 40 days (includes |^ne cutting) for first

survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

AIRBORNE CREDITSMagnetome

DATE: ^

Res. Geol.

ter 1

\-vx~V U'n

Previous SurveysFile No.

i..............

Type

(Special provii

ilectromagr(enter (

SIGMA

(linecutting to office)

DAYS— , . , per claim Geophysical— Fl''''trnrn^gr"'t "'— MpgnptnmMrr

— Radiomftrir , ,. .-.,--nt K^rC,pn]ng\nt\

r,fnrYirni\\ra\

lion credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

iptir RaHinmptrirays per claim)

rim r.- uX\Wf-Author of Report or Agent

Qualifications (f;^ ' '(-'O

Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

T. B. 656588(prefix) (number)

656589

656590

656591

656592

656593

656594

656595

656596

656597

657419

657420

657423

TWT* A. T /"*I A IKjf C J- JTOTAL CLAlMa. ————————————— —

Ontario

Ministryof Report of Work ^ Natural ,- , . . - . . , Resources (Geophysical. Geological,

Geochemical and Expendittf

The MiniType of Survey(s)—————————————————————————————————————————— 42C13SWS)829 2 .6813 WABIKOBA LAKE 300

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY f, RESISTIVITY WABIKOBA,AKEEAG-620Claim Holdor(s)

HEMLO EXPLORATIONS LTD. T 1360

Survey Company

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.Date of Survey (from Ri to) Total Miles oTlfne~CuF"

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

______ PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD., 200 YORKLAND BLVD., WILLOWDALE ONTARIOCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisionscredits do not applyto Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

—— ot^^'P-)

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days perClaim

-~— — —

- —— ——

Days per Claim

20

Days per Claim

—— . ———

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

-r 1 5Instructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

T. B.

-. ' ,. -.,,'.,,**

Number

656588

o565S9 .

656590 ,

656591

656592

656593.

656594 .

656595 -

656596

656597

657419

657420

657423

Expend. Days Cr.

Mining ClaimPrefix

,; ,, ; .

Number

————— .--... ——— ,—

Expend. Days Cr.

—— .. ——

Total number of mining claims covered by this i o report of work. ^ -^

Date

May 7, 1984Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Total Days Cr. Date Recorded Recorded

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed heTeto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

D. HOWE c/o OREQUEST CONSULTANTS LTD. 404 - 595 HOWE STREET, VANCOUVER B.C.

V6C 275Date Certified

May 7, 1984Certified by (Signature)

1362 (85/9)

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No

TYPE OF SURVEY

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

LOSignature of Assessor

3/*? r^iDate

1984 06 11 Your File: 243 Our File: 2.6813

Mrs. A.M. HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 566

Dear Madam:

Me have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Induced Polarization) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims TB 656588 et al 1n the Area of Wabikoba Lake.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours sincerely.

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

A. Barr:me

cc: Hemlo Explorations Ltd Suite 1550 609 GranvWe Street Vancouver, B.C. V7Y 1C6

cc: Ore Quest Consultants Ltd Suite 404 595 Howe Street Vancouver, B.C. V6C 2T5

L&.

yi/

L.±t/

•xy/ii i

i::n

r

l" l i

E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS

DEFINITE

PROBABLE

POSSIBLE

42C13SW0829 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE

HEMLO EXPL. GRID LINE-32E X = l 5 0 F P H Ci C O H M - M ')

D I F' O L E H U M B E F:C O O R D I N R T E 2 25 O S 1950S 1350 S l 0 5 0 SINTERPRETfiTIO

M* l 12K ,- 8689..- 19K 19*

16 11 l 34 5 O S

6830- 1 l IK

MM

•N-6

10K 0K.. 9048 ..

UK '"' UK 12K

00S 3061 "v^-10^/ 7629

4226 X'^S/ '^617^:^.860:::

9637 ,-y'482? 4894V X" 6732 ,/ 3664' X 2017

..3066 { 6644 73?5 /4I33 4727.

314" 4S15 V - 1 '' 9818 v -'4346 ^525P

HEMLO E .X F' L GRID L I H E - 3 2 E X * l 5 d F P H fi S E ( l 0 H Z

DIPOLE N U M B E F: l 0

COORDIHPTE SJ 5 O S. l O 5 O ':. 450 SI M T E R P R E T R T I D M

\\~ l 12

11

11

8.2 7.8 - 9.5

10" x 7.8:~V ,'~mrr:10 12 yf'U

t-, i 10

. 4.

7.1

- N = 5

I i' ' \ m-~

\ 1 6X,;:'-:''3.2 .--"'

10

8.7 9.1 8.1 - -"''

HEMLO EXPL GRID LINE-32E X ̂ l 5 0 F M E T R L F R C T Ci R

Ci I P O L E H U M E: E RCOORDIHRTE 22503 165GS

l 0 l l l 31350 5 M :-, 4 5 0 S.

INTERPRET RT ION

N- l .1 .1 .04 .1

N-2 .1 .1 .09 .09 .2

N*3 .1 .1 .1 .1

N*4 .1 .09 .2 .03

.09 .1 (.02)

.1 ,05 .06 .2 .2 .1

.09 .05 .2 .2 .09 .0?

.03 .07 .1 .2 .1 .2

.1 .2 .1 .1 .1 .1

.t?9 .2 .2 .08 .07 .2

.1

.1

200

l 4

Hs3'-

N = 5

N = 6

111 l 2 T l 3 l 14

[4 = 2-

N = 5

14

= l -

(4 = 3 -

DUG N O . - I P - 5375-7

HEMLO E X F' L O R fi T I O H S LTDH E M L C' E X P L . G F: I Ci

W fi B I Y. O B fi L R K: E R P E R - O M T R R T O

LINE N O . - 3 2 E

3

P L O T T I H C F' O I N T — y. - i 5 o

ir. U R F fi C E PROJECTION OF RN O M R L O U s ZONE

C' E T I N I T EPROBABLE •••••••••i VPOSSIBLE ^^^-*^ V

FREC1UEMCY 'HERTZ l 0 HZ

MOTE- C ON T OUR':. ft T LOGARITHMIC I N T E R l.' fi L S l - - l

D R T E c . l -f. 4

DATE

P H O E H IX G E O P H Y S I C S LTD

INDUCED POLflPIZfiTIOH

HMD P E S I S T I '-'I TV SUP'-'EY

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITEDINDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY SURVEY

PLAN MAP

56+OON-

52+OON-

48+OON-

44+OON-

40+OON-

36+OON-

32+OON-

28+OON-

24 + OON-

20+OON-

I6+OON-

I2+OON-

8+OON-

4+OON-

0 + 00-

O l

true northmagnetic north

-0+00

-4+OOS

-8+OOS

- 12+OOS

-16+00'S

-20+OOS

-24+OOS

-28+OOS

-32+OOS

-36+OOS

-40+OOS

MUSHER/ ^S s/f-^

LOCATION MAP

SCALE: l' s It mile

SURFACE PROJECTION OF ANOMALOUS ZONE

DEFINITE —————i Y PROBABLE i iiiiiiiin V POSSIBLE ^•w'w V

- E.M. CONDUCTOR AXIS

HEMLO EXPLORATIONS LIMITEDWABIKOBA LAKE AREA , THUNDER BAY M.D.

ONTARIO

LEGEND

-CLAIM BOUNDARY

D -CLAIM POST

' AT END OF ANOMALIES ES SPREAD USED.

SCALE400 400 800 iaoo 1600 FEET

EXTENT OF I.R. SURVEY }'4800

DRAWN:

42C13SW0029 2.6613 WABIKOBA LAKE 210

E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS

DEFINITE

PROBABLE

POSSIBLE

42CI3SW0029 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE

1HE ML Q EXFL . G P ID -- L 1 NE -24 W XM59F RHO CDHM-M)

DIPOLE NUMBER li 213 4 1 5 I 6 1 7 8 l 9 10 11 12 13COORDINfiTE 2490(4 2. 7 09 H 3000(4 33 9 ON A 3660N 3900N 4 20 3 1)IHTERPRETRTION . . W H - .

i i v V (4=1 9624 ..5024, 3884 -,. 9344 ,;;, v-4662 -1255 1080 y \2111 .3619^/5285,, 3489 \ 566? (4 = 1-

•14 = 2 9425 8249 \'-v4474 3891 33t)6 V 2163 2461 "'^1775 "\2938 \\5777 y'" 4321 4971, ^9037 (4 = 2-

-(•1 = 3 5299 7411; 3178"--, 5299;y'';i740 -, 2921-'"' 3915 3988 'v;-J936) 2900'-.... 4939 4S58/ ' 6960 (4 = 3 -

•(4 = 4 5695 5612 S 8 700 9222) ^885 " \ 1715) ( 48"2/ 5945 59620^95* 2065 " \ 4F6 / ' 6670 (4 = 4-

-(-4 = 5 493^ 7379-^*7860 9769 -' 501tf v 305*9""- 2867' ;' 6863 7173' ^"7764" -1 '--'- 224? 2244"' -'''5643 (4 = 5-

•(4 = 6 (4 = 6 -

H E M L O E y. P L G P I DI L I N E - 2 4 W X ^ 1 5 0 F p H R '-. E ' 1 . 9 H Z -

D I F' 0 L E N U M E E F' 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~ j * I 9 10 11 1 2 i 1 3C 0 0 P D I N R T E 24 0 9 M 2 7 0 O H 3000(4 3 3 9 0 N 3 600(1 3 9 0 0 N 42 9 9 NINTERPPETRT10N , , , . , , , .

•(4=1 3.3 7,j -,. 7 f , 10 , 8.6 \ 7 6.1 --.. 3.5 4.1 ,- , 3.3 . 6.4 ,- 9.* (4=1 -

-(•4 = 2: 9.3 -; 11 v 7.7 3.9 9.6 ,\3 7.6 "'"f". 6 " -. . 3.8 , \7.9^./' 5.9 .r.5 \11 N * 2 ~

•(4 = 3 25 "'\-.v -,9.3 ) 14 '"\ 9.4 9.9 -;" 6.9' ' . 7.8 7.6 7. P ---^ ^ 6.9 5.5 6.6 ) t. 3 (4 = 3 ~

•(•1 = 4 7.6'-;:,;\ 25 ' t : 1 1 14 "10;- 7.8 "- 7.] "- 7.5 8 f.' 1 1 ; \ i'4.4 ) 6 .1 .:--'7.5 (4 = 4 -

-(4 = 5 7.? y.e":; "- 18 11 12 -' 7.9 ? ' 7 7.1 v ' 11 7.8' 5.7 9 ^4 = 5-

•11 = 6 . Ns6 -

m

H E fi L 0 E X P L . GRIT' -- L I tt E - 2 4 l-J X * 1 5 9 F ri E T R L F H C. T 0 P

D I P 0 L E N U M E E R 1 2 3 4 5 6 j 7 B 9 1 S 1 1 1 1 1 2 j 1 3 ^C 0 0 P D I (l R T E 2 4 9 9 (4 2700 H 3 0 0 0 f J 33 0 0 N 3 6 0 0(4 3 9 O 0 (J 4 2 9 9 HINTERPRETRTION , , , , i i i

-(4=1 .09 .1 .2 .1 .5 .6 .6 .2 . 1 .2 .2 .2' N - 1 -

•N^ .1 .1 .2 .2 .3 .4 .3 .4 .2 .1 .1 .^ .1 . (4 = 2 -

-(4 = 3 .5 .1 .2 .2 .6 .2 .2 .2 .4 .2 .1 .1 .1 14 = 3-

•(4 = 4 .1 .4 .1 .2' .3 .5 .1 .1 .2 . 4 .2 .1 .1 (4 = 4 -

.2 .1 .2 .1 .2 .3 .3 .1 .1 .1 .3 .3 .2 (4 = 5-

(4 = 6 -

sao

D 1-4 G (4 0 . - i p - 5375 - |

H E M L 0 E X P L 0 R fi T I 0 N S LTD.H E M L 0 E X P L GRID

WflBIKOPfi LRf:E RRER -' OtJTRPIO

LINE NO . -24U

'•HI lin1 . ," .

i — {M — i i — m — iT 1 FT I- i

PLOTTING POT to ^ - - 1 50 f

s U P F R C E P P u j E C T I i' (J 0 F R (f 0 M M L 0 IJ -; Z ONE

- /\ F ' F' i J B R B L E * ' ' ' * B ' * " * V

d '

F F: E L! U E N C' Y ' H E R T I ' D R T E S U yffiffiJL^jfa^l 9 8 4

|*?p'r MAI J '^ Si *' >'NOTE- CONTOUR :. \ [^ ^ ^*v7 .'3i '-' **RT LO G ft P J l H Ml L " —— — -t-*f'— i- -y T 1

INTEPWftLS J;-!^ n flTp ^̂ ^ry^M

P H 0 E H I X G E 0 P H Y S I C S LTD.

INDUCED POLflRIZflTIOH

HMD P ESI ST F '..' I T Y SUPVEV

E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS

DEFINITE

PROBABLE

POSSIBLE

42C13S*ee29 2.6B13 WABIKOBA LAKE 330

H t HI n t ;:PL r, P Id L l HE- l

* l

:-;M50F P HO ' OHM-M)

. i 3 T36QQN

""' 1 '" 3

4 5 00 Mt—

M- 3 141-

in14*: UK

17K "t 1 4K ,'

13K

H^ l

1 f rf.-' - ' \ \ f#'

/-^W'' .^1947

H ' 6

H F HI O Flirt. ij

P IE Q EI "T y si EFT*iTiT E P FFE i FFrTciTT

ID L i NE- i s ;:-l ^.0F PHfl':.E O 3h

: 3IIT H.." T lHItlZZ IIZ—j-..-™. --^..™.—..l 10 13

tl

10 11 TN

9.4, 9.7 . li

^"A l i i \i • u*/ v 11

'-, 9.5 -^ 11 ,-

b. l '' 9.? '7.1

.4 , ^ l -

3.1

4.;"!

H-4

H-5

TOPOGRAPHY LAKE

HE ML O E:: F L GP ID L I NE- 16 ME mi rnt TOR

i N'T L P r p'ETS T T oli"""""

'T~~3~ "T"'4"""T"5 p-g-—p—^ ] g700 H 00033 0 0N

.j.^II-AilIlL4.j]Lj.5j;jE-Ls.™

M * 2

tl-4

.3 .07 .1 .0? .0ft .09 .1 .06 .1

.09 ,0S .06 .1 .0'.-: .08 .08 .08 .1

.^ .06 .W. . 1 .0-1 ,0S .07 .2 .4

.07 .06 .os {o J .04 .05 .2 .4

.os .07 (-.o;--j TN .04 .1 .4 .3

•——-f- 1.1 --

.1 .1

.05

.6

.or-

.J

—L._____^.™,.--^.^.-. .._______L,

.4 .5 .4

.4 .4

.1 ,3

M-3

DWG t in -r P - 5375-2

H E N L O E X P L O R R T I O H S 1. T DH E Ml O E ! "'. P L. GRID

W fi R I l' O P f) L fl t' E fl F F fl O H l fi P I O

L I ME MO - l 6U

~——N X j:':PLOTTIMGPHI NT :-;^ i 5o

'~. 11 f-T n L. F F' P O J E C T I O M OF R M O M rt L O U ':- Z O M F

DEFI HI TE FROBRBL E POS? t BLF *.^"*^ V

FPEi'-UEHCV -'HE P T!7, ) l 0 HZ

H O T E - C O M T O U R 'lRT LOGRFITHMIC IHTERVRLS l , -l,5- -2 i - 3 , - 5 . - 7 5 , - l 0

O FI T E SUH F' F F' O

l :? ft 4

D fi l E

P H O E H I X G E O P H Y S I C S L T D

I HOUCE O PC LRPIZflTI ON

RND PES I S T I '..'I TV S U P'J E Y

E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS

DEFINITE

PROBABLE

POSSIBLE

42CI3SW0829 5.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE 24-0

H E M L O E X P L G F: I L' ; LINE- tf -f 0 0 X s l 5 0 F . R H O ':. O H M - M

P I ROLE NUMBEF:C O ORO IN (H T E 400:;, l 0 0 S

INTERPPETRTIONN- l

l O l l l 2 14 115 l i e 20 21e o N 3 0 0 N l 10 UN l 4 0 O H 1700 N 2000N 2309N Z' 6 O 0 N 2900 N 3 S O 0 N

\-\~A

H* 5

,,.5960.,' 3333,- 2342.. 4745,.- x 14K ,,\2U \ 1 8*'

695 556* X, 131'

5003 5228 ""•-

5841 ^' 4618 ^100i '^,

5887- 4575 ''*V

18K SJ28K/// 8028,'.- V.22K

3 l4 l 00 M

14K /. 19K .

12K /. { 3301 /' 2

171. ;y':'5220.- (2424.X''6

6652 /' 3748 X 5945

24K

19K 16K

/' 22K \ '-'' y

-' 201:

in ,. "' 28K

131 22K 'J. 14K

20K/ 17K ''x 25K V\ UK X-"' 22K

9|- ,y 43K 10K 13K I

241 v 19K

22t 2U-

"-- 15K S 2 4K x 37

l IK u' "30T 401-

19K ) 25K /)^524.\X^10K V'22K \ 16K x' UK "'-\:\5220 ^ \-.

23K ^ H K" V 7804 v 13K X- 27K 'xy'^242''- 399'

H E M L Ci E X P L , G P I D -- L I H E - 6 * 0 0 X - l 5 O F P H R E; E vi 0 H Z )

D I F' C' L E H U FI E: E F' l G l l 12 l 14 1 7 18 il ? 24COOF'DINFlTE 460S- 1 0 O S 2 O O H 5 O ON z- e e N l l d O N l 498N 1709 H 2 O 0 0 N 2 390N 2606N 2900N

30 T 3 l3200 H 3500N 3 S O G H 4 l O i3 M

I N T E P P P E T R T I O N

N^3

MS 4

N ^ 5

\\ = {.

11 n 15,. 12

10

17 11 , -' 9 .1 8 \ 13

,- 17 /"-vS.3 /-., 16 \ '''..8.6^

29 :- /' 1 2 11 11 X J?

12 X 19 ^ 11 ,,-;/' 26

'l5 '"' 11 '''-" 27 TN

14 X"' l ? 1 ~ v4^ X 8-4 , 13

: ( 16) 17 19 N-O'^J\.-^ 13 x ?-19 16 "' " 8.1""'""- X2^'' ""- 14 --1 8.6

?.4 9. Q 9.^- 8J?

/' 10 \ 9.6 8 S.9 ^; .6 '

14 19 \ S.& 8.5 9.6 ( 5.7

l 14 10" 12 \ 'fA^--^, 7.7

11 t-.t '.l .7___7.8 9.!

. ; 6.4 \. 8.4 /

10 14e -. 12\ 8 .4 . 12 ( 9 8.4 9-7 ,' 6.4 \ 8.4 /' 12 'L , S.7 - ^ 19 .-'" 13 12V \ '| - f ^ x '-- -.__^.'

r.lX -: -t ""N.10^--, S.5 8.1 ,X"7.1 5.9 ; ( 11 /' 18 ^x e.l^"~^-x^0_ _10 11

7.5 '\. 11 \ 7.

11

5

.6

13 10 10'- x 6.6 "' 8,4

.X s.i ':'^'\^/ :̂.z^'••\'-\^A_ 7.3) \. 129.2 "' "' '2CT- 7' -"'9.4 ""^v 4.4 3.1 v ' 8.5

H * 2 -

H - 6

.7 "'

N s 3 -

Ms 4 -

N s 5 -

N 5 6 -

TOPOGRAPHY SWAMP

H E M L C' E X P L . GRID - LINE-0 ';'. = l 5 0 F M E T R L F R C T O P

C' I F' C' L E H U M B E R l 0 l l 12 l 3 l 4 15 j l' l 5 21 c. -i i 4 30 3 l 32C O O R Ci I N R T E 4 O G S 20QN 5&0N S 0 O N l 100N l 4 0 0 N 1700 N 2 O O 0 N 0 N 2600 N 3 0 0 H 2 0 0 N 3 5 O O N 3 S O O N 4 l 0 0 HI N T E R F' F: E T R T I O H

= l .08 .0?

.OS .1

.1.2

.09 .06 .07 .06 .97 .0 .05 .96 .95 .05 .93 .1 .96 .95 .06 .04 -OS .1 .89 .87

.06 .93 .04 .OS .05

.4

.1 .4

.3 .1 .05

. l .04 .05 .64 .04 .06 .05 .04 .03 .09 .05 .09 .06 .07 .3 .1 .2 .1 .07

.4 .3 .2 .68 .04 .05 .OS .05 .05 .04 .95 .04 .05 .93 ,03 .05 .07 .1 .04 .95 .06 .6 .03 .07 .07 .8

.4 .5 x;:l|.6)'/ .1 .1 .04 .09 .03 .06 .94 ,06 .06 .05 .03 .63 .94 .05 .2 .97 .03 .05 .1 .04 .04 .94 -. '\, ~2

.94 .94 .06 .05 .95 .06 .03 .91 .04 .04 .1 .09 .95 .93 .2 .08 .98 .02 .6TN A -l -0? -07

H s l -i

(1 = 2

Ms 3

NM

H = 5

N = 6

DWG NO. - l P - 5375-3

H E M L O E X P L O R R T I O N S LTDH E M L O E X P L . GRID

W R B I K. O B fi L R K E fi R E R O N T R R I O

LINE NO -0+00

H ^

F 1 L O T T I N G F' O i H T —— X ^ l 5 0

SUPFflCE PROJECT I ON OF ftNO MR L O US ZONE

DEFINITEF' F' O E: ft E L E •••••••••iPOSSIBLE ^^^-^

F F: E C' i.l E N C Y ( H E F' T r j l O HZ

H O T E - C O H T i j U R S fi T LOG RF: I THMICi NTE'PURLS i . - i 5

D R T E S URpppog

? S 4

DRTE

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.INDUCED P OLRPIZRTION

R N D P E S I S T I '-.' I T Y ? ij p-',' E Y

E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS

DEFINITE

PROBABLE

POSSIBLE

42C13SWOIB29 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE 250

HEMLO EXPL GRID - LINE-SB X^ l 5 OF PH O '-O H M-M

14 15 IS 17 19 20DI POLE NUMBERC O ORO! NflTEI ITT ERR RET RT ION

-.. 4

4—————————t—————————l

. - A ^'TCt ^ O^P1 , -.ir i" "-1-7-90iii-j.* ne t* y -,\y5Di,-. -- ti-j**i i. j f-j————l—————————i————————H—————————i

164"7 , - \3224 -, 2560 2127 -.-- 1152 !3 x 34?. 564 566 ,v 1307..-- 1517.v 4002 3934 . \1976 vJ8^. x 4742V 7277.- 7967 Sl36,vx 1595^————————————K

,V 1933

- H - 5

14K ^177?," 2734 2661 ; 3414 3214 -,. 250? ' y)467 106l""V;,72u

1933,, ~Vt?016 3506 3089 354? 3t01 ,2631 2ti0r-C-,1335..-"

3480 3164 3567 3022 7-601 4350 3306

3612 'r'2?7? 2905'

/' '--2153.,-'32?? .- -,812ti 7*45. /' 3441 ^ 536^,-?259 .N.4375

946 3727 y'5674 v;s- XJ5K '"' 23K'' ::'--4026 -";;''l45'3 ' 1660 -"2626'51P5'- 462'? '" 5631'"- ' 2937 -"'" 4453 3148 3556 364? ''"9290

H E N L O E XPL. GRID : LINE-SE y * l 5 O F P H fi 'B E M . 0 H Z

DIPOLE NUMBER 10 11 12 14 \ 2 4 ^2 it- lCOORDINflTE 5 O r-. 2 5 i? M 5 5 e M S50N 1150 H 1450 M 2350H 2 6 5 fj N 2950 N 3250H 3 55 ON 3S50N 4 l 50 Hl N T E P P P E l R T I O N^ i \^. - \ 4.5 ,..--- 5 v::A...8yv \ -.7.9 8.1 8.2

9.6 /' 5.? 6.1 6.4 "---4^,. ': 9 .4 7.5," 5.2

7 ; : '" 14 ";"- 7.-^.^"''7\5 3.6 7\6, " "'4.7 \

14 ,. '"''7,7 ' 2.5 9.1 '' 7.2 6.S 4.9!

8.6 ?.7 ••'7.2 5.2 6.6

5.'? 5.2 x 3-1 ;- 6.?~.__ f __

5.7 6.2 5.2 \7.6/

5,8 7.2 ..---"' 9 "'X 6.5

- ';7.6 9.6 -••" 11 ,- \ 5 .6'i 6.6 ' 9.9 '-' 12 "' S.? '

11 11 6.3

"-. 9.4 , 16

6.2 ' 9.4

'.9 8.3 '*, 10 IS .i.2 13 ," 5.5

/'' U ..-'9.4

11 "8 - 1 ' 11

6.9

5.5 \7.6 v.. e. l•*~ . \:.3 \ 6.8 \ 3.1 9.8

.2 " -.. 8 .5

4.5 4.7 6.6 ) 9.1 •: 7.1 \.

7.4 4.4 "'-

8.7 ?.y ,- 6.5 5.7

S.9 9.3 ,- 6.6 6

9.3 /' 5.9 6.8 6.2

9.6 /" 6.7 7.4 7.1

6.7

\\~ l -

TOPOGRAPHY SWAMP SWAMP X BOG

HEMLO EXPL . GRID L I ME-SE :' ^ l 5 0 F H E T R L f W l T D P

C' I F' Ci L E H U M D ECOORDINRTE 350^. INTEPRRETflTION

5 d S 2 j ON S 5 0 HT T5 Til l .. IT" 17

l l 50N l450U14 15.16 171819 ^ y 2 l c b ? l

l 756N 2 C' .5 Q h 2350 N 2650H 2950 H 3250 H 3550 N 385 O H 4 l 5 O

S l .62 .4 l .

.y i' .1

.4 .4

.4

.4

.1

,.. 1.2 1.4 ..- .x

. 1.^., .4 .4

.7 .4 .4

.6 .2 . 1. . 1

.4

.1

.1 .1

.05

.1 .1

.4 . l .09

.2 .tl6 .2

.03 .68 .4

.05 .06 .2

.1 .4 .1 .64 .y. .1 .1

'.3 .3

.2 .08 .2

.68 .66

. l .06 .05

.68

.i .1 .1 .4.1 .09 .1 .5

.09 .9? .4 .4

.2 .1 .4 .5

.04

L!!::

DWG . NO . - I P - 5375-4

H E N L O E X P L O R R T I O H S LTDH E M L Ci E X P L . G F: I C:

LflKE Ft P. E Fi ONTflFIO

L I NE HO -8E

H :-

F' L O T T J N GF' O I N T —— :-: s i 5 o

SURFRCE PROJECTION OF HHOMftLOUS "ONE

DEF1NITE M VPROBRBLE •••••••••i ^7

n P OSSI&LE ^-^mm-v y

HERTi 0

D R T E S ij ft

R F' R F' O y

1984

N O T E - C O H T O U R SRT L O G fi P I T H M I C.I N T E F' U f\L'l l , - l 5-2 , -3 , -5 . -7 5 , - l 6 DRTE

P H O E N I X G E O P H Y S I C S LTD.

IHDLIC ED P O L RF: IZRT I ON

RND RES I ST I VJ TV flJPVE

E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS

DEFINITE

PROBABLE

POSSIBLE

42CI3SW0829 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE

HEMLU EXPL GR: I D L l NE- 16E X ~ l 5 0 F F: H O ( O H M - M )

D I F' d L E H U M B E F 1COORDINATE 1400 l 1100 'l 8 O y iINTERPPETRTION* l 15k 171 ,

201. ( 1 41,

161"

* 4

\15K --

14K J' I E

17K/' Itt.xX"

17K //9164 -:-'"4i59

5 00 S M12 13 14 151 16 l 17 l 18 lTT 21

l 0 0 N 40 ON r y 0 H 1000H 13 e o N l 600N

941 V 3096x^1054 v.,2321/ 4036 38tl" 5889 .4611 7366 "174 -4748 .. 1917.-- 2 199 - -, 1577 1??4 - 2201

c. --"24 T

19GON 2 2 3 0 H 2500N

17 -"/

l 31 l 323 l 0 0 H 3 4 O OH

\4694 ,;: .862y 3439. \3374 24SO "\1695// 4551 3751 3746

l 3915 4741 , 2393.., 3480 - X2590 2645 244?

4563/ ^8115^^2072 x 4133 't-0^3/ \\1S23/ \3S9S.. (8167y. -'3859 3290/ 7354152 \5510 "X.4599/7 \ 111 " -,v4

' 3539 ,-V 1327 1523 vv. 450S)/-; 10K v--. 3321: 13K \6474 3903 '-. 6873 5909 6264 3709 \ 2440 ..-'3142 '5722 6283 ) 4*991; { 6743 7237 336 1 3342 4676 3480 x-, 2651- ', ' __ __ 'v- - ' .- '', ~!"-— ' ' ' ' ' '''- -"" - ' ——— '' ''- — '

' ' 4''X^514 } ;'~ 1SK '-4698 4185 /v'l?51,- ,'3219V\:•* .' "- 'm .

19*' -'V8743 •- : 3965 y'5472 X -^ 1670 - ' 33?'? 3355

l IK ; ': 5618; 3654 4596 4199 s 5861"" \ 3778 4541 3609 'y',8365; ^.4913 4241)^.875643'*' " \2\ l?^ '- '7952 -t497 4346 '275?'' ' 6?65 ""8026' 5282 6536 5059"""- 4970- 5612 6997 5338 '-" 3211 4020 "v 5060

3154 X 6525

A -'590?

H E n L O E Y. F ' L GRID L I H E - l 6 E X s l 50 F P H fi S E '-" l . 0HZ

C' I F' Ci L E N U M B E F 1T——4 i e 11 12 IV. 14 15 16 l 7 l 20 l 21 T c. t 1 l TTT

C O C F 1 C I H RT E l 4 O O i l l G O S sees 5 0 0 5 200:- l 0 0 M 4 O CM 700 M l 0 O d N l 300M l 6 0 O H 1980H 2200 H 2500 N 2S00M 3 i sen 4 0 O HI M T E P P P E T R T I O M

12 10 10 10 "•-;- 6.;

13

13

3.8 y L3 H ;- 9.5

leT 12 11 1 X '5.1 /' 12 ,U;:'

3.6 4

'M\ ~ l '"'' 4 ''

O

"1. Q p 12

'^.'•'f:

- c- ^./- c- J-X-V \'''\'"' ,-' 11

- .9.9 7.6 8.3

14 11 ', (7.1

,10 , 8.8 8.6

10__ 10

"15" 10 - 9.7 " 11 1.4

.\,^

-1.7

-, 8.4

14 14 11 . v , .1 (

"'X 11 ( 17 ) ^8.4 'j Z.? _^J5.5 7.3

8.2 ) 14 13 \ ;7.1 ^-t I.? ""X 4.?, :''' "'\, '' -'" 11 13 11 7.3 ''" 1.6' ; " ' 6.7

---..7.8 ( s\2.6x;.,---"5.^ 6.6 'X4.2 "X\8.2 8.5.,--' 6.4 P -; 11 .; i

\ 6 .9 r 8.6i

: 7.5

8.1 ~ l -

6.!

4.4 yfl.ft 8.8 (8.2) "- (7.1) -' 8.1

;. 7.1 ' . 8.8

' "'-III-

12 "Ho")

H - 6

TOPOGRAPHY STREAM STREAM

H E M L O E/: P L G P J D L I ME- l 6 E X* 150F METHL Fft C TOP

D I P OLE NUMBER 10 11 l 2 l : l 4 l t. l 18 19 2 l 24 *1 C; 3 lC OOPDINfiTE 14003 1100 1. 8 G O -l 206':. l 6 0 H 4 00H 700 1600N l 3 0 0 N l 600 M l 9 Q G H 2 2 0 0 H 2 5 O 0 H 2800N 3 l 00N 3400NINTEPPPETfiTI ON

H= l

\ N = 4

.05 .68 .07 .1

.07 .or .07 .07.08 .07 .07 .1

.07 .08 .1

.08 .1 ' .2

.08 .3 .3 .2 .04 ;-.09 .0'? . l

.2 .2 -.1 .1 O -.02 .07 .1

.3 .3 .1 O .07 .01 .04 .O:-4

.2 -.05 .1 -.1 .05 .03 .05 .05

.2 .1 .09 .64 -.06 .06 .04 -.01

.1

.1

.4 .4 .6 .1 .09 .3 .06

.2 .3 .5 .06 .1 .2

.1 .2 .2 .2 .1 .02 .3

.1 .04 .1 .3 ,08 .2

.1 .1 .02 .1 .2 .2 .1

.Ci? .2

.3 .2

.1

.04 .1 .1

.05 .2

(.2) (.2) .2

.4 S l H

.4

.1

H s -i .

.4 (.2) H s 5

aeo

DWG N O -I P -5375-5

H E N L O E X P L O R fi T I O H S L T DH E M L O EXPL. G P I C'

U R E: I Y ". C BR L fi K: E R R E fi O H T fi R I d

LINE NO - l 6E

N :-:

F' L O T T I M GF- Ci i H T — X s l 5 O

'E; U F' F R C E F 1 P O J E C T I O H O F R H O M R L O U 8 Z O N E

[i E F I N I T E F'POFjRBLE POSSIBLE ^-*-*.^-v

FPEOUENC Y ( HERTZ ̂ l O HZ

N O T E - C O H T O U P SRT L O G R F: I T H H I C INTERVALS . l , - l . 5 -2, -3, -5, -7. 5, -10

D R T E S U B*^eSBioMX: l 9 8 4 S .4) ^ - — "vR p p P c, y/^/^^x ̂

. *? l 3 Q \ *•f rf U—— i" pi 1.1 7

DRTE

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.

I NDUCED P O L RP I Z RT I ON

RND RESIST I 'J ITY S UP 1.,1 E Y

E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS

DEFINITE

PROBABLE

POSSIBLE

42C13SW8029 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE

HEMLO EXPL GRID LIHE-54E X s l 5 0 F R H Ci (. O H M - M )

O I P O L E H U M Ei E F: T~3 l 4i; O Ci R Ci I H R T E 2 2 5 0 i 1950 'I l 6 5 O S 1350SINTERPRET RT I ONM- l

*

i e 111056S 750S

. : 6134 \ 3773 /s 1 775 32

is A l 14 li- M 150Sf' T1^

15 l 16 l 17 l l S ITl 5 8 H

390 /f 1 423 -.,23ie .3144

\\\

UK

1U

1342 1124 1881 14*7 1146

,

11 ^1523^909,^21vs v—-: V, /y.-

•'^•045 " 4023 '* y~' 24K

2871 2526 2023 X" 3526

\ 2741 / ' 3731 .X 6264/"r

142?' 73w25 "'' \\\. 1 3K

'-- 1 151 ''K 2669

7865

- N = 6

HEMLO EXPL GRID L l HE-24 E X* 150F RHRSE -:: l . 0HZ'1

D I F1 Ci L E N U M E: E P1 l l l 2 l 3 14 15 l 9COOFDINRTE 9 5 C S i e 5 e s 1359S 1050 8 4 5 C S 5 O H 4 5 OINTERPRET RT I OHs l 10 10

10

-. 10 \ 9.6 .'

9.5 , 10,' \ 5.8

6.1 7.6., 5.1

6.2 6.9 6.9

\ 1.1 x, 4-e 3-s 4-7 V ' 1-6/i1 "', l"\ /---^ r—-, .———' ---~'-} '-:'--.6.8 '.3 ; '\ 2 /V -.6*..' 5.8 t '.2.7' '

10'; 8.9 s10____( 10 -C..^ 9'i

i'-i .t-, 11

8.5 .;" 11 '-.. 8.5 v

9.6 '* 13

•3 ^ ' -;l d ? ''' -v S -fC": -' S -'" 4O.' , -, *T.il , p '."j-, *O "^/'- ^ •-1 -' "

\ '-, /' 'v;... ^——____—-' 8.2 7.9'^V 2,5 ":-:-.. .5 "^ 2.? 2.

\ /~" •r e i. /' ir

1.1

H s 6

TOPOGRAPHY LAKE SWAMP

HEMLO EXPL GPID LIIIE-24E X - l 5 O F M E T R L F Fi C T O R

D'lPOLE NUMBER l 0 l l 12 l l SOORDINfiTE 2250':. l l 6 5 O S 1050S 1503. l 5 ON 4 5 0 r,

INTERPRET FIT ION

N s 3

N*4

- H ' 5

- N ^ f.

.1 .1 .0& .07 .05 .04

.1 .1 .0.-* .05: .0? .05

.1 .0? .1 .1 .06 .3

.1 .09 .0? .0? .7

.1 .1 .OS .5 .3

.2 .1 .3

.2 .1 .04 .2

.1 .04 .03

.1 .07 .04 .05

.03 .93 .1

.04 .1 .1 .4 .1 ...J^V ...L.

.1 .1 .6 .1 -.05 .r..4 .2 .3 .2 .02 .1 .1

.4

.1

.t-

.e.07 .01 .04 .07 .1 .03

.03 .02 .03 .1 .05

2 W

r, l -

H = 3 -

H a 5

i'W

11 = 4

H s 5

N = 6

DWG NO -I P-5375-6

HEMLO E XPL OR fi T I O N S LTDHEMLO E X P L . G F' I D

WRBIKOBfl LflKE RPEft - ONTRRIO

LINE NO - 2 4E

F' L O T T I H G P Q I H T —— X = l 5 O

SlJPFRCE PROJECT I ON OF H MOM R L O US ZONE

DEFINITE RPOBRBLE POSSIBLE ^-%-v^* V

F p E O IJ E N C V ''HERTZ.'i 0 H r

H O T E - C D N T O LI P SRT L O G R R I T H M I i:I N T E R U R L S l , - l 5 -2.~Z.- 5.-7.5.-10

DATE 1984

D Fi T E

PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD

INDUCED POLflPIZRTIOH

HMD RESIST I VI TV SURVEY