Slide 1

Ryan G. Kernes, Amogh A. Shurpali, J. Riley Edwards, Marcus S. Dersch, David A. Lange, and Christopher P.L. Barkan International Concrete Crosstie & Fastening System Symposium Urbana, IL 6-8 June 2012 Investigation of the Mechanics of Rail Seat Deterioration (RSD) and Methods to Improve the Abrasion Resistance of Concrete Sleepers

Slide 2

Slide 2 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Outline Objectives Rail seat deterioration (RSD) background Large scale abrasion test Evaluation of frictional properties Small scale abrasion resistance test Results Conclusions and future work

Slide 3

Slide 3 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Objectives Understand the mechanics of the most critical failure modes Investigate parameters that affect abrasion mechanism Characterize frictional forces between rail seat and rail pad Propose methods of mitigating the critical failure modes Quantify abrasion resistance of various concrete mix designs, curing conditions, and surface treatments

Slide 4

Slide 4 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Rail Seat Deterioration (RSD) Degradation of concrete material under rail and pad Increases maintenance costs Shortens service life of the concrete crosstie Leads to track geometry defects Feasible mechanisms: Abrasion Crushing Freeze-thaw damage Hydro-abrasive erosion Hydraulic pressure cracking

Slide 5

Slide 5 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Abrasion Mechanism of RSD Abrasion is a progressive failure mechanism that occurs when: Frictional forces act between two surfaces in contact Relative movement occurs between the surfaces Harder surface cuts or ploughs into softer surface Progression of abrasion at the rail seat 1.Cyclic motion of rail base induces shear forces 2.Shear forces overcome static friction 3.Pad slips relative to concrete 4.Strain is imparted on concrete matrix Abrasion involves 3-body wear: two interacting surfaces (rail pad and rail seat) and abrasive slurry (water and fines)

Slide 6

Slide 6 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Large Scale Abrasion Resistance Test Experimental Setup Vertical Actuator Horizontal Actuator Abrasion Pad Concrete Specimen

Slide 7

Slide 7 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Large Scale Abrasion Resistance Test Results Consistently able to cause deterioration of concrete due to abrasion Concrete deterioration initiates near pad edges and propagates inward Heat build up in pad materials at local contact points leads to softening and adhesion to concrete surface Difficulty in correlating severity of abrasion to input variables Contact angle and pressure distribution Heterogeneity of concrete surface

Slide 8

Slide 8 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Experimental Evaluation of Friction Magnitude of static frictional force is directly related to the normal force between the two bodies by the coefficient of friction () Experimental frictional coefficient measured during test calculated by: = ||/ where F is the force required to initiate lateral sliding under vertical normal load P 400 loading cycles to simulate single unit train pass 5,000 pound normal vertical load (420 psi), 1/8 lateral displacement, 3 cycles/second, no abrasive fines or water added

Slide 9

Slide 9 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Mean Coefficient of Friction per Loading Cycle Polyurethane Nylon 6/6

Slide 10

Slide 10 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Effect of Environmental Conditions on Nylon 6/6

Slide 11

Slide 11 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Effect of Environmental Conditions on Concrete Abrasion Polished surface with no sand Abrasion initiated with sand

Slide 12

Slide 12 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Effect of Increasing Normal Load on Nylon 6/6 5 kips 3 kips 10 kips

Slide 13

Slide 13 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Small Scale Abrasion Resistance Test (SSART): Test Setup In general, similar to other standard abrasion tests Consists of powered rotating steel wheel with 3 lapping rings Lapping rings permitted to rotate about their own axis Vertical load applied using the dead weights Abrasive sand and water dispensed during testing

Slide 14

Slide 14 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Test Protocol Each test can evaluate 3 specimens Multiple tests are run to evaluate more than 3 specimens Specimen dimensions: 4 inch (diameter),1 inch (thickness) Duration: 120 minutes Wear depth measurements taken every 20 minutes Speed: 60 revolutions per minute Abrasive fine: Ottawa 20-30 sand Before After

Slide 15

Slide 15 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Test Variables Admixtures Silica fume: 5%,10% Fly ash: 15%, 30% Curing Condition Moist Submerged Oven dry Air Surface Treatment UV epoxy Polyurethane Grinding Fiber Reinforced Concrete (FRC) Polyurethane Steel

Slide 16

Slide 16 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Effect of Mineral Admixtures

Slide 17

Slide 17 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Effect of Fiber Reinforcement

Slide 18

Slide 18 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Effect of Curing Conditions

Slide 19

Slide 19 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Comparison of Techniques to Increase Abrasion Resistance

Slide 20

Slide 20 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Additional Tests Conducted Objective: to obtain specimens batched by industry concrete crosstie suppliers Silica fume and epoxy coated specimens tested Saw-cut surface of control specimens considered analogous to ground surface and tested GrindingEpoxy coating

Slide 21

Slide 21 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Effect of Surface Treatments

Slide 22

Slide 22 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Conclusions Large scale testing: Confirmation of abrasion as a feasible RSD mechanism Frictional coefficient is affected by temperature, water, sand, normal force SSART: Successfully compared 13 approaches to improving abrasion resistance of rail seat through material improvements Improve abrasion resistance of concrete with: Optimal amounts of fly ash Proper curing condition Addition of steel fibers Grinding cement paste

Slide 23

Slide 23 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Future Work Determining the optimal frictional properties at each interface of multi-layer rail pads (top, bottom, and between layers) could: Reduce movement at critical interfaces Influence load path and location of slip Delay the onset of abrasive wear and extend rail seat life Extend to other fastening system components SSART: Perform image analysis to characterize the role of coarse aggregate in abrasion resistance Study the effect of air entrainment and quality of aggregates on abrasion resistance of rail seat Use of Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) to model abrasive wear of concrete specimens Optimize concrete mix design and surface treatments to mitigate abrasion

Slide 24

Slide 24 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Acknowledgements Funding for this research has been provided by Association of American Railroads Technology Scanning Program NEXTRANS Region V Transportation Center Eisenhower Graduate Fellowship For providing direction, advice, and resources: Amsted Rail - Amsted RPS: Jose Mediavilla, Dave Bowman, Brent Wilson, BNSF Railway: John Bosshart, Tom Brueske, Hank Lees AREMA Committee 30: Winfred Boesterling, Pelle Duong, Kevin Hicks, Tim Johns, Steve Mattson, Jim Parsley, Michael Steidl, Fabian Weber, John Zeman TTCI: Dave Davis, Richard Reiff Pandrol Track Systems: Bob Coats, Scott Tripple UIUC: Tim Prunkard, Mauricio Gutierrez, Don Marrow, Darold Marrow For assisting with the research and lab work: Josh Brickman, Ryan Feeney, Kris Gustafson, Steven Jastrzebski, Andrew Kimmle, Calvin Nutt, Chris Rapp, Amogh Shurpali, Emily Van Dam, Michael Wnek

Slide 25

Slide 25 Investigating Rail Seat Deterioration Questions Ryan Kernes Research Engineer Rail Transportation and Engineering Center - RailTEC email: rkernes2@illinois.edu Amogh A. Shurpali Graduate Research Assistant Rail Transportation and Engineering Center - RailTEC email: ashurpa2@illinois.edu