safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods yoshiaki oka...

19
Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light- water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Upload: baldwin-lester

Post on 17-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods

Yoshiaki Oka

April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Page 2: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

SCLWR-H plant system

Page 3: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Flow rate low   Level 1  Reactor scram   Level 2  AFS   Level 3  MSIV/ADS/LPCI systemPressure low   Level 1  Reactor scram   Level 2  MSIV/ADS/LPCI systemPressure high   Level 1  Reactor scram   Level 2   SRVAFS: auxiliary feedwater system      MSIV: main steam isolation valve      ADS: automatic depressurization systemLPCI: low pressure core injection system

Page 4: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Capacity:RCIC(AFS) TD 1 unit: 4%/unitAFS    TD 2 units: 4%/unitADS 8 units: 20%/unit at 25MPaLPCI   MD 3 units: 150kg/s/unit at 1.0MPa

Configuration: TD- RCICLPCI/RHR

TD-AFS   TD-AFSLPCI/RHR   LPCI/RHRRCIC: reactor core isolation cooling system

RHR: residual heat removal system

Page 5: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Accidents

1 Total loss of feedwater

2 Reactor coolant pump seizure

3 Control rod ejection at normal operation

4 Control rod ejection at hot standby

5 Control rod ejection at cold standby

Transients

6 Loss of feedwater heating

7 Inadvertent startup of AFS

8 Partial loss of feedwater

9 Loss of offsite power

10 Loss of load with turbine bypass

11 Loss of load without turbine bypass

12 Control rod withdrawal at normal operation

13 Control rod withdrawal at hot standby

14 Feedwater control system failure

15 Pressure control system failure

Page 6: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

24.0

24.5

25.0

600650700750800850

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

20

40

60

80

100

pressure

feedwater flow rate

peak cladding temperature

power

time [s]

rati

o [

%]

tem

peratu

re [℃

]pre

ssure

[MP

a]

Total loss of feedwater accident

Page 7: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Coast-down time [s] 1 2 3 4 5

PCT [ ]℃ 974 934 890 859 833

AFS capacity [%/unit] 1 2 3 4 6

PCT [ ]℃ 872 857 856 833 816

AFS delay [s] 3 10 30

PCT [ ]℃ 833 902 904

PCT: peak cladding temperature

Total loss of feedwater accident

Page 8: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

25.0

25.5

26.0

26.5

27.0

600

650

700

750

0 1 2 3 4 50

50

100

150

200

main steam flow rate

pressure

feedwater flow rate

peak cladding temperature

power

time [s]

rati

o [

%]tem

perature [℃]

pressure [MP

a]

Loss of load without turbine bypass transient

Page 9: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

Transient criterion

Accident criterion

151413119 108765

peak

cla

ddin

g te

mpe

ratu

re [

℃]

event number (corresponding to Table 3)

Page 10: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Ratio of coolant density coefficient 0.5 1 1.3 1.5

Maximum pressure [MPa] 26.8 26.8 27.6 28.7

Maximum power [%] 114 154 419 887

Peak cladding temperature [ ]℃ 707 727 873 1040

SRV setpoint [MPa] 26.0 26.2 26.5

Maximum pressure [MPa] 26.6 26.8 27.2

Maximum power [%] 135 157 177

Peak cladding temperature [ ]℃ 698 727 652

PCT: peak cladding temperature

Loss of load without turbine bypass transient

Page 11: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1524

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

Transient criterion

Accident criterion

max

imum

pre

ssure

[M

Pa]

event number (corresponding to Table 3)

Page 12: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Transients PCT [ ]℃ Over 670℃ Over 700℃

Loss of feedwater heating 671 1.5 s -

Partial loss of flow 702 4.5 s 1.0 s

Loss of load (no-bypass) 727 0.5 s 0.3 s

PCT: Peak Cladding Temperature

Durations of high cladding temperature

Page 13: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Result – 100% hot leg break (blowdown)

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

5

10

15

20

25

pressre peak cladding

temperature

Time [s]

Pre

ssure

[M

Pa]

Tem

peratu

re [℃

]

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

100

200

300

400

Break ADS Hot leg (Intact)

Flo

w r

ate [

%]

Time [s]

ADS line

LPCI

ADS

MFL

MSIVMSL

Break

Page 14: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Result – 100% hot leg break (blowdown)

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

5

10

15

20

25

pressre peak cladding

temperature

Time [s]

Pre

ssure

[M

Pa]

Tem

peratu

re [℃

]

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

100

200

300

400

Break ADS Hot leg (Intact)

Flo

w r

ate [

%]

Time [s]

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

power average water density

Time [s]

Pow

er

[%]

Density [g/

cm

3]

Page 15: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Result – 100% Cold leg break (blowdown)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 20 40 600

5

10

15

20

25

pressure peak cladding

temperature

Time [s]

Pre

ssure

[M

Pa]

Tem

peratu

re [℃

]

0 20 40 60- 600

- 400

- 200

0

200

400

600

Core top Core bottom Water rod top

Flo

w r

ate [

%]

Time [s]

Break

Page 16: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 100 200 300 400 500 6000

5

10

15

20

25

pressure peak cladding

temperature

Time [s]

Pre

ssure

[M

Pa]

Tem

peratu

re [℃

]

200 400 600 8000

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Core Down comer

Wat

er lev

el [m

]

Time [s]

LPCI 容量 (kg/s/u

nit)100 150 300 400 800

被覆温度( )℃

1190 930 800 690 650

Page 17: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

0 10 20 300

50

100

450

500

550

Core power Core flow rate

Rat

io [%

]Time [s]

T = 0 sec : Scram, T = 1 sec : ADS

300

400

500

600

700

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

5

10

15

20

25

pressre peak cladding

temperature

Time [s]

Pre

ssur

e [M

Pa] T

emperature [C

]

Core power does not exceed 100%.

Cladding temperature does not exceed that of normal operation.

Depressurization cools the core effectively

Page 18: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

T = 0 sec : ADS, T = 0.55 sec : Scram

300

400

500

600

700

0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

5

10

15

20

25

pressre peak cladding

temperature

Time [s]

Pre

ssur

e [M

Pa] T

emperature [C

]

0 10 20 300

50

100

150

200

250

300

Core power Core flow rate

Rat

io [%

]Time [s]

Core power increases to 160% before scram.

But cladding temperature does not exceed that of normal operation because core flow rate is higher.

Page 19: Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison

Summary of the results

• Total loss of flow accident: maximum cladding temperature stays low, 833C (margins to the limit 1260C)

• Overpressurization transient without turbine bypass shows 50% power rise and Tc reaches 727C, (margins to the limit 800C )

• Duration of high cladding temperature is short less than 5 sec. Potential for improvement of fuel integrity criteria at transients.

• Hot leg break LOCA gives rise to reactivity insertion. But Tc reaches only 550C. Core flow is induced by depressurization due to the once-through coolant cycle.

• Cold leg break LOCA, Tc reaches 930C, (margins to the limit 1260C)

• Depressurization cools the core effectively