safety management systems & reliability chris w. hayes, md cpsoc april 12, 2011

42
Safety Management Systems & Reliability Chris W. Hayes, MD CPSOC April 12, 2011

Upload: jack-wilcox

Post on 22-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Safety Management Systems &Reliability

Chris W. Hayes, MD

CPSOC

April 12, 2011

Overview

How safe is healthcare? What is Safety Management System System defences “Swiss Cheese” model Reliability

– Group exercise

Summary

How Safe is Healthcare?

How Safe is Healthcare?

Canadian Adverse Events Study– 7.5% of admission suffer an AE

– 9250 to 23750 preventable deaths/yr

– Death from AE in 1/165 admissions

Baker R. The Canadian Adverse Events Study. CMAJ 2001.

HealthCare

How Safe is Healthcare?

Why Is This So?

“Medicine used to be simple, ineffective and relatively safe.

Now it is complex, effective and potentially dangerous.”

Sir Cyril Chantler

Chairman, King’s Fund

Why Is This So?

Clinical medicine has become extremely complex:– Increased patient volume, acuity

– Growing therapeutic options

– Expanding knowledge, evidence

– Surprises, uncertainty

– Many sources of (incomplete) information

– Interruptions and multitasking

Why Is This So?

AND… Safe and quality outcomes (for the most part)

dependent on healthcare providers [humans] Is that a problem?

Why Is This So?

StrengthsLarge memory capacityLarge repertory of responsesFlexibility in applying responses to informationAbility to react creatively to the unexpected

LimitationsDifficulty in multitaskingDifficulty in recalling detailed information quicklyPoor computational abilityLimited short term memoryPerception

•Compassionate / caring

Gets worse with:-fatigue-stress-lack of knowledge-lack of confidence-lack of supportive workenvironment

HealthCare

Where Should We Be?

AnesthesiaBlood Transfusion

How Do We Get There?

Healthcare needs to become more like an ultra-safe industry– Learn from other ultra-safe industries

– Learn from components of medicine that have achieved high degree of safety

– Develop a strong Culture of Safety

Safety Management Systems?

Safety Management System, SMS– Taken from ultra-safe, HROs

– An organizational approach to safety

– Focuses on the system not the person

A systematic, explicit and comprehensive process for managing safety risks

Safety Management Systems?

SMS origins from aviation industry– In response to major airline disasters in the 1960’s

– Initial focus on “safety system”• Made department / individuals responsible for safety

Safety Management Systems?

Safety Management Systems?

SMS origins from aviation industry– In response to major airline disasters in the 1960’s

– Initial focus on “safety system”• Made department / individuals responsible for safety

– Realization that to achieve full scale safety goals need whole organization approach

Safety Management Systems?

Main objectives:– Detecting and understanding the hazards and risks

in your environment

– Proactively making changes to minimize risks

– Learning from errors that occur in order to prevent their reoccurrence

Safety Management Systems?

With the understanding that:– Safety is everyone’s job

– Embedded at all levels

– Humans are fallible

– System defences need to be designed / redesigned to protect patients

CultureOf

Safety

System Defences

Redundancy and Diversity– Need for multiple layers

– Need for multiple approaches

2 Types of defences– Hard defences – engineered features, forcing functions,

constraints

– Soft defences – rules, policies, double-checks, signoffs, auditing, reminders

System Defences

Hazardous domains (nuclear power)– activities are stable and predictable

– heavy reliance on engineered safety features.

Healthcare defences– most of the defences are human skills.

– sharpenders (nurses, junior MDs) are the ‘glue’ that holds these defences together.

System Defences

Disaster happens when:– There are initiating disturbances, AND

– The defences fail to detect and/or protect

– often necessary for several defences to fail at the same time.

Incidence of error (losses) depends on:– The frequency of initiating disturbance (hazards)

– The reliability of the system defences

Reason’s “Swiss Cheese” Model

Defences are only as strong as their weakest link!

Some holes dueto active failures

Other holes due to

latent conditions

HazardsHazards

LossesLosses

A System Model of Accident Causation

Reason’s “Swiss Cheese” Model

Defences are only as strong as their weakest link!

Some holes dueto active failures

Other holes due to

latent conditions

A System Model of Accident Causation

HazardsHazards

LossesLosses

An Example

SMH ICU– Patient with CVA has seizure in ICU

– MD orders 1g Dilantin over 20 minutes

– MD called to reassess patient for severe hypertension and ST changes

– Metoprolol given with bradycardia but little BP effect

– Pt suffers large MI and CHF

An Example

Reason’s “Swiss Cheese” Model

HazardsHazardsSound-alikeSound-alikelook-alike look-alike drugdrug

LossesLossesCHF/MICHF/MI RN/MD Double-check

Medicationorganization

Purchasing

Manufacturer

Making Your System Safer

Accept that errors will be made Incorporate features of Ultra-safe SMS

– Actively seek hazards (FMEA, Walk-Rounds) and learn from errors that have occurred (RCA)

– Create multiple defense layers to prevent error (hard and soft as appropriate)

– Make safety everyone’s job

Making Your System Safer

“We cannot change the human condition

But…

we can change the conditions under which humans work”

James Reason

Making Healthcare Reliable

How do you close the hole’s in the Swiss Cheese– Design strong defences

• Engineer problem away

– Include human factors design (later)

– Build in reliable processesreliable

Reliability

Reliability

Measured as the inverse of the system’s failure rate Failure free operation over time

– Chaotic: failure in greater than 20% of events

– 10-1: 1 or 2 failures out of 10

– 10-2: <5 failures per 100

– 10-3 : <5 failures per 1000

– 10-4 : <5 failures per 10000

Reliability

Reliability principles, used to design systems that compensate for the limits of human ability, can improve safety and the rate at which a system consist-ently produces desired outcomes.

Reliability

Three-step model for applying principles of reliability to health care systems:

1. Prevent failure

2. Identify and Mitigate failure

3. Redesign the process based on the critical failures identified.

Table Exercises – The case

As your organization’s PSO your are made aware of several patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation following Code Blue calls despite known advance directives stating the patients’ wishes were to be DNR

In both cases the DNR order was in the chart but were not easily located nor were the assigned nurses aware of the order

You were aware that No Resuscitation Policy that contained a standardized order form was created, approved by senior management and MAC and was available for use

POLICY PRACTICE

Group Exercise

Identify a process to make more reliable Describe the current process (flow chart) Identify where the defects occur in the current

system Set a reliability goal for the segment

Roll Out - The Usual Way

IDEA

Discuss&

Revise

Discuss&

ReviseDiscus

s&

Revise

Discuss&

Revise

Discuss&

Revise

Discuss&

ReviseInitialPlan

InitialPlan

BOARDROOM

REAL

WORLD

Roll Out - The Better Way

IDEA

InitialPlan

InitialPlan

BOARDROOM

REAL

WORLD

Applying Reliability

Understand the process Find the defects, bottlenecks and workarounds Plan process improvements Test them…small scale, front-line

involvement….until they work Look for failures and …redesign

Summary

Healthcare has high error rate Understanding hazards and learning from errors

vital Defences that rely on more than human vigilance

need to be in place Need a strong culture of safety Need to build reliable processes Start small….involve frontline Safety improvement is everyone’s job

Thank You!

Questions?

[email protected]