saleh faisal ali, a095 917 975 (bia apr. 15, 2015)

8/9/2019 Saleh Faisal Ali, A095 917 975 (BIA Apr. 15, 2015)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/saleh-faisal-ali-a095-917-975-bia-apr-15-2015 1/8

Whiting, Rebecca MarieImmigration Attorneys, LP203 N. La Sale StSte 1550Chicago I 60601

Name: ALI, SAEH FASA

J

Executive Oce r Immigration Review

Bd Immigtin AppQc k

5107 Leesburg Pik, Suite 2000Flls Chuch. Vn 2030

OHS/ICE ffce of Chef Counsel CHI525 West Van Buen StreetChcago I 60607

A 095-917-975

Date of ths notce 4/5/05

cosed s a copy of he Board's decisio and order in e above-rerenced case.

nclosr

H G

Sncerl,

D C

Dona Carrf ek

Dk

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visitwww.irac.net/unpublished/index

Cite as: Saleh Faisal Ali, A095 917 975 (BIA Apr. 15, 2015)



US Deparmnt JusiceExecutive Oce r Immigration Review

Decision of he Board of Immigraion Appeals

Fas Church, Viginia

File: A095 917 975 - Chicago IL

In r SALEH ASAL AL

RMOVA PROCDIGS

APPAL AD MOTION

Dte:

ON BHALF O RSPNDENT Rebecca . Witg squire

ON BHAL OF DH

CARG

Anastasie M SentAssist Chief Counsel

APR 1 5 20

Notice Sc 237(a)()(B) I& Ac [8 USC § 227(a)()(B) ] n the United taes in violaio of law

APLICAIO Remd; adjusmen of stas

The rspondent, aive an citze of Yme has peled o he dcision of teImigraio Jdge dted Jue , 203 denyg is requs r a cotnuac to await theadudcaio of a spousl vsa pito and orderg hi reoved om th ted ttes to

Yemen pursuant to he chrge the Noice to Appea he respodet as also ed a oio tormd the procedgs to h migrato Judge he Depaet of Homead ecurt("DH) opposes h appel nd the oton to remad The record wl be reded

The respondt has submtted evdence hat lowg te migratio Judge's decsio theoard susaind he apel om t eial of the vis petiton led o he resodes hafand t ptiion has been approved The resonde subtd with he moion o 485,Application o egster Peanen Residec or Adjust Saus T resodes mooncomplis wh he rglaory rquremens r a oio o remand and wll grnd 8 CR§ 0032(c) see Maer of Coelho, 20 I& e 464 471 (BI 992) (saing ha herquiremens r a moion o remad re essntlly th same as he requiremes r motio to

reopen)

ORDR record is rmanded o he Immigrao Cou r thr proceedingsonsise e gg p d y a w

R T BOARD

Cite as: Saleh Faisal Ali, A095 917 975 (BIA Apr. 15, 2015)



UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JSTCEXECTV OFICE FOR IMMIGRAION REVEW

TED STATES MMIGRATION CORT

CICAGO ILLNOIS

le: A095-917975

I the Matter of

Jue 3 2013

SA FASAL AI)))

)

IN REMOVAL PROCEINGS

RESPONENT

CHARGE:

APCATON

Secto 237(a)(1)(D) - e spondent h s been c ed s being

nyime er dmssion as a nomgrat uder Secto101(a)(15) of the Act the espodet has reaed the tedStates for a oger te tha permtted volato of the Act or ayother law of the ted States

otnuace euest

ON BEHALF OF RESPONDET RBECCA M WITNGImmgrato Attorneys LLP203 oth aSalle St. Sute 1550Chcago Illos 60601

ON BEAF OF S ELZABET TREACY Assstat Ce CounselDepartmet of omead SecutyOce of Igato ad Custos nforcemet

Chcago

los 6060

ORAL DECSION OF THE MMIGRAIO UDG

Te espodet s a atve ad ctzen of Yeme who was adtted to the Unted

aes at w Yok ew ok o or aot Apr 9 200 as a nonmmgan stor

wth autorzato to rema te Ued Staes fo a temporary peod ot to exceed



20 2009 aai based o te pedecy o a 130 petitio Cousel o te

espodet tat time submitted addol documetato i suppot o e

respodets vs petition iled w SCIS. O Marc 23 2010, cosel o he

respodet submitted those docuets to this Cou. .d

Subs qu t

to a

iin we th e rsign

mmiraton ude took over te case, Cousel o

sod ele led an additiol reues o a coiace whic tis Cout

rated o Jue 30 2011. Mr Chelsea aso iled a request or a cotinuance

ovembe o 2011. O Decebe 7 2011 te Cort red tat cotiuace. Mr

Celsea lso ed a moo o withdw May o 2012 ad preset cousel moved to

substitute io te Court case o or abou May 11 2012 e Cout allowed or te

motio o sbsio o cousel and alowed te curret cousel to step to the case

ispot.

h cou also rated a cotuance to curre cousel when a

cotiuace equest was led o May 6, 202 ad ths Cou ated a coniunce

o ue 6 2012. Now sice Jue 6 2012 te case as bee cotiued uher to April

4 2013 d lly to oday's date ue 3 2013.

Despite all o tese cotuces hat have bee rted by e mratio

Court sice 2003 the respode stil as o viable applicatio o eie ped beoe

this Cot Ad cousel r e espodent as indicated that te respondet does

ed o pursue is cret visa petton wic will be pedin o appea beoe the

Bord o Immirao Appeals However based upo the recod beoe ts Cor ad

e pedecy o is proceed or e ast te yers, the Court does ot id tht ere

is ood cuse show o conuace is matter any urte Based pon te

egutios in 8 CF.R Sio 003.9 d se on Bo o mmgio Appes

pecedet decision Mate o P z-Adrad ,

19 l&N Dec. 433 (BIA 987) e decisio

to rat o dey coniances within the discreto o e Imiatio ude i ood

A0999 3 ue 3 2013



cause is shown and it ca be show that the esponde receved a ful ad fai

hearng e Cor also efers to he Boad o Imigratio Appeals deciso i Mate

ofHasmi

24 N Dec 7 BA 29 which drecs he Co o decide wheher o

ot o coniue remova poceedings to await adjudcato of a vsa petiion ad a he

focus of the uiry of e mmgratio Judge should be o a lkeihood of success o

the adjustme application

In his partcular case, te respode has had three previous visa petitions filed

Oe visa peo was wthdaw by he sae petitioer Whie tha has bee

apparety eiled ad while the Cout has been formed hat the respodent has bee

married since Augus of 22 to the same wife the Cout is also mdful ha the

respoden has aso received three previous deials on his visa petton applcatio

om USCIS I do not fid that the espoden is ikely to succeed in his adjusme

process ight of the three previous denias

Howeve ore ipoatly, the respodet has had en years in these

proceedgs ad numeous coiuances to try to ecti hs saion here in te Unied

Sates I do not see tha hee would be any de process volaio eatg o te

respodes case as I do ot see ay evidece preseted to he Court that would

show that there woud be a dierent eec of he outcome of his hearing today or even

the Cour were to gran a coinuace n ths mate See Ambati v R o 233 F3d

14, 16 7h Cir. 2 hat case states that where an ae does ot se forh

evidence tha wold have bee preseed or argmens that would have bee made

had couse bee give additioa tie o pepare his case he aien as faled to

demostrae hat he aeed ioaon o pocss poea mpace he ocome

of his hearing

Whie it s possble hat he responden wil be successu on is appeal that s

A991-9 4 Jue 3 213



prospectie a is pon an in ligh of three preios l-130s ang bee fle an

enie the Court fns that the responent as reeie fair an fuamenta proess

in these oceeings heefore on the bass of the resoens peios nueros

otnuances beng grate e Court will not contnue the case ay fuer an base

pon the fa at the responet seeks no aitional relef before this Cot toay the

Court wil ente e folowing ore

ORDR

ORRED that te responent be reoe fom e Unite tates to

Yee on the harge in te Notie to Appear he Cou fon that the responent

was remoable by clear, conincg an nequioal eiene an the responent has

reqeste no form of elief before this Cort oay. he Cou wil sig the oer oay

in a smay orer.

signature

0991797

Please see the next page for eectronic

SHEA MCNULYmmigration Jge

June 3 2013



I � "

v

//s//

Iigration Judge SHELA MCNUTY

mcnultys on epember 12, 03 a 10:22 PM GMT

A95-9797 5 6 ue

saleh faisal ali, a095 917 975 (bia apr. 15, 2015)

Documents