scanning electron microscopy techniques · 2019-07-09 · the object being imaged is the source...
TRANSCRIPT
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Scanning electron microscopy techniquesMS‐633 Material Science and Engineering (EDMX)
Emad Oveisi, Marco Cantoni
Lausanne, Spring 2019
http://cime.epfl.ch
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Outline
2
• Introduction to electron microscopy (EM) (by E. Oveisi)Why use electrons?Wavelength and resolutionTypes of interactions
• EM setup (by E. Oveisi)Electron sourcesLensesVacuum systemDetection system
• SEM (by E. Oveisi & M. Cantoni)
• Operation, Signals• Contrast mechanism• Interpretation of images, Challenges• Related techniques• Advanced and high‐resolution SEM
• Chemical analysis and Monte Carlo simulations (by M. Cantoni)
• Focused ion beam (by M. Cantoni)
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 20193
How the SEM works?
• Electrons are accelerated to high energies
• Condenser lens system defines probe size and control probe current
• Scanning coils above Objective lens raster beam on sample
• Objective lens focus probe on sample
• Various detectors surrounding sample collected radiated signals
Scan coils
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
• Image formed step by step by the sequential scanning of the sample with the electron probe (using pair of deflector or scan coils, controlled by the scan generator)
• Monitor and scanning coils are synchronized• (one‐to‐one correspondence between the rastering pattern on the specimen and the rastering pattern used to produce the image on the monitor)
• Intensity of each pixel is proportional to signal received (collected electrons)
• When changing the magnification, we just change the raster size (no change in optics)
Under sampling
Sample Screen
Magnification = Area scanned on the monitor / Area scanned on the specimen
How the SEM works?
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 20195
Which to trust? The scale bar or the indicted magnification…?
Measure the size of the particle and calculate the magnification !
Particle size is around:200 nm on the image (scale bar)1 cm on your laptop screens20 cm cm on the TV screen/projector
Quiz: what is the magnification of this image?a) 50 kXb) 1 MXc) 35.46 kXd) depends
Magnification
Magnification = Image size / Raster size
200 nm
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 20196
Operational parameters
1. Beam accelerating voltage (kV): the voltage with which the electrons are accelerateddown the column;
2. Probe convergence angle (αp): the half‐angle of the cone of electrons convergingonto the specimen;
3. Probe current (ip): the current that impinges upon the specimen and generates thevarious imaging signals;
4. Probe diameter or spot size (dp): the diameter of the final beam at the surface of thespecimen.
Looking at the diagram it would seem that all we would have to do to maintainadequate probe current in a small probe diameter would be to increase the probeconvergence angle. But this is not the case due to aberrations in the optic system.
A small probe diameter always comes with a decrease in probe current.
These parameters are interrelated in other ways. For example, a decrease acceleratingvoltage will result in a decrease in probe current as well as an increase in probe size.
Doing SEM involves understanding the trade offs
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 20197
Lenses in a SEM
There are a number of points to emphasize about lenses when thinking about SEM:
Electromagnetic lenses are used to demagnify the image of the beam source and to focus the beam on the specimen.
Condenser lenses are involved in demagnification of the image of the beam source.The objective lens focuses on the specimen as well as demagnifies.
Condenser lens
Objective lens
Smaller probeBetter resolution/detailsLower current: less charging and beam damage
lower signal to noise ratio
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 20198
Lenses in a SEM
The object being imaged is the source diameter (Gaussian intensity distribution) of the electron beam.
So, we are interested in demagnifying this beam source diameter Smaller probe size
Image from Scanning Electron Microscopy Primer, University of Minnesota
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 20199
Lenses in a SEM ‐ Focusing
Workingdistance
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201910
Lenses in a SEM – Spot size
Condenser lens
Objective lens
Smaller probeBetter resolution/detailsLower current: less charging and beam damage
lower signal to noise ratio
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201911
Lenses in a SEM ‐ Condenser aperture
Aperture size (micron)
Probe current Purpose
30 Low Ultrahigh resolution; Low probe current; Large depth of field
70 Medium Usual observation
100 High Good resolution at high probe current; Reduced depth of field
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201912
Resolution in a SEM
Spatial resolution in the SEM depends on spot size Smaller spots give higher spatial resolution
Shorter electron wavelengths mean smaller spot sizes Higher electron voltages give higher spatial resolution
BUTMany different factors limit spatial resolution, “in practice”, with in the SEM,
e.g., combined signals from multiple scattering, size of interaction volume, columbic interaction, aberrations, specimen charging….
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Scan parameters
10 pixels1px = 20 nm20 nm probe
5 pixels1px = 40 nm20 nm probe
20 pixels1px = 10 nm20 nm probe
20 pixels1px = 10 nm10 nm probe
200 nm
Over sampling – Blurry image
Under sampling – Poor resolution
Good sampling – Good resolution
Good sampling – Resolution?
More pixels
Smaller probe
Less current
15 sec
60 sec
240 sec
240 secOr more!
1 sec Dwell time
0.8 sec 1nA
0.8 sec 100pA50 sec 100pA
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Scan parameters
10 pixels1px = 20 nm20 nm probe
5 pixels1px = 40 nm20 nm probe
20 pixels1px = 10 nm20 nm probe
20 pixels1px = 10 nm10 nm probe
200 nm
Over sampling
Under sampling
Good sampling
Good sampling
More pixels
Smaller probe
100 nm
Under sampling
You must find balance between spot size/pixel,
current, and scan speed!
Sample Drift, Beam Damage, and Charging influence your
choice of scan speed and current and thus are practical
conditions that determine resolution
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201915
Focus and depth of field
In focus Over focusUnder focus
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
d = depth of field = required spatial resolution= convergence angle
d
Region of image in focus
The picture can't be displayed.
For small angles, tan =
The picture can't be displayed.
Can control depth of field (d) with convergence angle ()
Out of focusOut of focus
The picture can't be displayed.
Depth of field
The picture can't be displayed.
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Depth of field
30 µm100 µm
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201918
600 um OLA 200 um OLA 100 um OLA
WD
10 m
m
20 m
m
30 m
m
30 m
m
10 m
m
Depth of field
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Stereoscopy
Parallax: Brain compares the view from different locations in order to estimate the distance
Parallax
Left eye sees: Right eye sees:
How do we see things in 3D?
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201920
Stereoscopy
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201921
Stereoscopy
Image at ‐5 degree tilt Image at +5 degree tilt
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201922
Elastic scattering
Incident electron
scatteredelectron
Incident electron
Back scattered electron
Rutherford‐type scattering
• No energy transfer
• Low angle scattering: Coulomb interaction with the electron cloud
• High angle scattering, or back scattering: Coulomb interaction with nucleus
• Atom is not ionized
• Backscattered electrons have an energy range from 50 eV to nearly the incident beam energy.
• Most backscattered electrons retain at least 50% of the incident beam energy.
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Inelastic scattering
Incident electron
Secondary electron
Scattered electron
• An incident electron ejects a bound electron and scatters with an energy lowered by the electron
bound energy.
• The ejected electrons having low energies (5‐50 eV) are called secondary electrons (SE) and carry
information about the surface topography
• The incident electron can be scattered by Coulomb interaction with the nucleus
• In the case of inelastic interaction, there is energy transfer, and the target atom can be ionized
Incident electron
Scattered electron
Continuum X-ray (Bremstrahlung)*
* Incident electron decelerated due to the electromagnetic field of the atom nuclei‐> Energy released in the form of X‐ray (White radiation)
Ionizazion ‐> Emission of charateristic X‐ray or Auger
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201924
Electron signals:
Secondary electrons SEElectrons ejected from material at low energiesTopography, low energy ≈ 5‐50 eV
Backscattered electrons BSEIncident electrons that elastically scatter and leave the sampleAtomic number ZEnergy ≈ eV0 (range from 50 eV to an energy close to initial energy)
Auger electronsEjected electrons with an energy characteristic of target elementsNot detected in conventional SEM, surface analysis
Incident electrons interaction with the sample produces:
SEM signals
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201925
Other signals:
Electromagnetic radiations:
• X rays with continuous energy, resulting from deceleration of incident electrons ("Bremsstrahlung" or “breaking radiation")
• Characteristic X‐rays with a distinct energy associated to the target atoms.
• Cathodoluminescence: Visible radiation mainly emitted by insulating or semi‐conducting materials.
Others:
• Absorbed current, electron‐holes pairs creation, EBIC• Plasmon• Sample heating (phonons)• Radiation damages: chemical bounding break, atomic
displacement (knock‐on) damage
Incident electrons interaction with the sample produces:
SEM signals
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201926
Surface signals:
• Secondary electrons (topography)• Auger electrons (electronic states, chemistry)
Sub‐surface signals:
• Backscattered electron (Z contrast, crystallographic information)• Characteristic X‐ray (compositional information)• Secondary florescence (Cathodoluminescence, band‐gap)
We DO care where the signal (electron) comes from
Spatial resolution depends on the size of the interaction volumeInteraction volume differs with material, accelerating voltage, spot size
Monte Carlo simulations
BSE spatial res.
SEM signals
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201927
SEM signals
Red trajectories = Primary and backscattered electrons
Blue trajectories = Secondary electrons (SE1, SE2, SE3)
NOTE: Image signal is displayed at the probe position NOT at the actual SE production position
SE2 + SE3 reduce resolution
SE1: from interactions of the incident probe withspecimen atoms.• SE1s are produced in close proximity to the
incident beam and thus represent a high lateralresolution signal
SE2 from interactions of the high energy BSEs withspecimen atoms.• Both lateral and depth distribution characteristics
of BSEs are found in the SE(II) signal and thus it isa comparatively low resolution signal
SE3 are produced by high energy BSEs which strikethe pole pieces and other solid objects within thespecimen chamber.
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Interaction volume ‐ Effect of beam energy
30 keV 20 keV 10 keV 5 keV
Red trajectories = backscattering
Blue trajectories = Primary electrons
The more the beam energy,
• the less the probability for elastic scattering(larger mean free path) Probability of elastic scattering is inversely proportional to beam energy
• the trajectories near the surface become straighter, so, the more the penetration depth (i.e. larger interaction volume)
Cumulative effects of multiple elastic scatterings cause some electrons topropagate back towards the surface, thus widening the interaction volume.
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201929
Interaction volume ‐ Effect of beam energy
Top surface images of a TiO2/perovskite/FA‐CN device acquired using electron beam energiesof 3 and 1 keV, respectively demonstrating the perovskite and covering HTM layer.
S. Paek et al. Advanced Materials (2017).
Sample courtesy of S. Paek , GMF‐EPFL
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201930
Interaction volume ‐ Effect of beam energy
Effect of the accelerating voltage on penetration depth and SE signal
20 kV: Strong penetration: SE2/SE3 is a much
larger signal than SE1. It reveals the copper grid under the C
film via the electron backscattering, but the structure of the film itself is hidden
2 kV: Low penetration, only a few electrons
reach the copper grid and most of the SE2 are produced in the C film together with SE1.
The C film and its defects become visible
From D.C. Joy, Hitachi News 16 1989
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201931
Interaction volume ‐ Effect of beam energy
1 KV 5 KV
10 KV 30 KV
30 keV imaging has higher spatial resolution. However, the larger interaction volume and increased edge effects masks the fine features of the surfaces.
30 kV – buried interfaces are visible though surface features are less resolved
1kV ‐ Surface features are resolved with high spatial resolution
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201932
Interaction volume – Effect of “Z”
C Si Cu Ag Au
Red trajectories = backscattering
Blue trajectories = Primary electrons
The more the “Z”,
• the more the probability for elastic scattering(shorter mean free path)
• the shorter the penetration depth.
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201933
SE/BSE yield
Ionization occurs more readily at lower incident electron energies
BSE yield increases with “Z”
BSE yield depends on “Z” of material, and SE yield depends mainly on the voltage
Energy (keV)
Low Z
HighZ ƞ
SE yield
• ƞ shows a monotonic increase with atomic number. Thisrelationship forms the basis of atomic number (Z)contrast.
• Areas of the specimen composed of higher atomicnumber elements emit more backscatter signal and thusappear brighter in the image.
• Z contrast is relatively stronger at lower atomic numbers(see the slope of the line).
• δ is relatively insensitive to atomic number (around 0.1).
(SE1)
ƞ
δ
• There is a general rise in δ as the beamenergy is decreased, primarily due to thereduction in the interaction volume.
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
BSE yield vs. beam energy and Z
10 nm
BSE=14%
BSE=34%
BSE=44%
200 nm
BSE=8%
BSE=33%
BSE=47%
1
BSE=6%
BSE=50%
BSE=33%
Cu
C
U
1 kV 5 kV 20 kV
Higher yield
NOTE: There is only a small change in η with accelerating voltage. As the accelerating voltage is reduced toward the very lower end (1 keV), η increases forlow Z elements and decreases for high Z elements
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201935
SE/BSE yield
Energy spectrum of electrons leaving the sample
Auger electrons
SE: secondary electrons 0‐50 eVBSE: backscattered electrons E > 50 eV
BSE energy range: BSEs follow trajectories which involve very different distances of travel in the specimenbefore escaping. The energy range for BSEs is thus wide (from 50 eV to that of the incident beams energy).The majority of BSEs, however, retain at least 50% of the incident beam energy (E0).Generally speaking, higher atomic number elements produce a greater number of higher energy BSEs andtheir energy peak at the higher end is better defined.
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201936
SE/BSE imaging
Images courtesy of Manuel Bianco, GEM‐EPFL
STEEL
SrCrO4
MnCo2O4
Specimen: Ferritic stainless substrate initially coated with a porous MnCo2O4
This materials were coupled at high temperature (750°C) with a perovskite material.
SE image BSE image
SE have low energies (5‐50eV), and thusare emitted only from surface andpossess information about topographicalfeatures.
BSE emission depends on “Z”, thusintensity in the BSE images scales withatomic number and depends on localcomposition
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201937
Top surface images of a TiO2/perovskite/FA‐CN demonstrating the perovskite and covering HTM layer.
Sample courtesy of S. Paek , GMF‐EPFL
SE image BSE image
SE/BSE imaging
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
SE/BSE imaging
Dust on WC (different Z materials)
low Z materialflat material rough material low Z material
thin layer of contamintion low Z material
SE 25kV BSE 25kV
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201939
Detectors
https://myscope.training/legacy/sem/background/whatissem/detectors.php
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201940
Detector geometry
The fact that SEM images can be (somehow!) readily interpreted by viewers derives fromthe “Light optical analogy”.
The direction of the detector within the image is analogous to where the “illumination” appears to come from.
Since we are used to having illumination from the overhead, we should rotate the scanned image so that the detector/sun appears to be at the top of the image.
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201941
Detector geometry
Pyramid Etched pit
Interpretation requires to know where the detector is located.
Since we are used to having illumination from the overhead, we should rotate the scanned image so that the detector/sun appears to be at the top of the image.
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201942
Detector geometry (SE)
Quiz: If is the image of an indentation‐like feature, where the detector is located w.r.t. the image?
A: Upper‐left B: Upper‐rightC: Lower‐left D: Lower‐right
In‐lens detector located directly above and centered
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201943
Detector geometry (BSE)
Segments A+B
Segment A Segment B
A‐B B‐A
Quiz: Which segment configuration for this image?
B
A
BA
B A
B
A
A B
C D
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201944
BSE yield vs. tilt
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201945
BSE yield vs. tilt
NOTE: Surface roughness (tilt) may affect thecontrast between the heavy and light elements
Less Z contrast
More Z contrast
Large angle BSE detector Small angle BSE detector
Pure silver with topographically irregular surface
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201946
• If a sample is titled, the interaction volume is tilted and closer to the surface. Thus, more SE escape from below the surface, giving higher signals
• The same principle is true for rough surfaces – Sloped surfaces and edges have an interaction volume that is effectively titled and have higher SE signals
1. Rough Surfaces have high SE image contrast2. Titling can improve SE image contrast
SE yield vs. tilt
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201947
I0I()
1‐10nm
At high kV: penetration depth >> SE escape length
(adapted from D.C. Joy Hitachi News 16 1989)
Relative yield of SE vs angle of incidence on the sample surface:
SE yield vs. tilt
At low KV: penetration depth = SE escape length
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201948
Do not forget, in SEM:The signal is displayed at the probe position, not at the actual SE production position!!!
intensity profile on image
Size and edge effects
R, Electron range
SE signal intensity across spheres with diameters larger and smaller than electron range R and increase of the signal at an edge caused by diffusion contrast
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
49
In‐lens SE detector Everhart Thornley detector
In‐lens SE Detector located directly above and centered
SE2 Detector located on the lower right
Size and edge effects
Why they are different?
Where is the detector for each image?
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201950
Relaxation processes of the excited state
Characteristic X ray
X-ray generationX ray energy characteristic interorbital electron transitions and thus of the element
Auger electron
Emission AugerThe relaxing process interacts with an electron with a characteristic energy
Incident electron
Secondary electron
Scattered electron
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201951
Energy of the X‐ray peak for carbon?
Other signals in SEM – X‐ray
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201952
Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy
Other signals in SEM – X‐ray
• From beryllium up to periodic table • Sensitivity 0.1 wt%• Quantitate analysis (many requirements)• Point, line scan, and mapping• Interaction volume (important for SEM)• About 130 ev energy resolution for Si(Li) detector
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Example of EDX‐SEM
STRONTIUM POISONING OF STAINLESS STEEL
STEEL
SrCrO4
MnCo2O4
• SEM SE picture of a ferritic stainless substrate initially coated with a porous MnCo2O4
• This materials were coupled at high temperature (750°C) with a perovskite materials• The SEM/EDS analysis was fundamental to understand that Sr migrated from the
perovskite into the steel
Slide courtesy of Manuel Bianco, GEM‐EPFL
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201954
Electron-holes creation: An incident electron onto a semiconductor can excite a valence electron to the conduction band, creating an electron-hole pair.
Cathodoluminescence:The excited electron recombines with its hole, emitting a photon with the gap energy, in the visible. This technique allows to put forward the defects that modify the gap energy.
Egap
Conduction band
Valence band
Electron incident
Egap
Conduction band
Valence band
Conduction band
Valence band
Electron that has lost energy
Eg =h
Other signals in SEM – Cathodoluminescence
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201955
Examples of CL Images of perovskite solar cell materials using Attolight ROSA SEM‐CL
SEM-CL is useful for correlating/detecting
phase distribution and composition with luminescent properties
defect structure with optical properties
detection of trace elements, their valence and structural position
Other signals in SEM – Cathodoluminescence
Slide courtesy of Dr. Thomas Lagrange – CIME In collaboration with Prof. M. Graetzel’s group LPI‐EPFL
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201956
Challenges
Beam induced changes to the sample:
• atom displacement ("knock on")
Radiation damage
• chemical bound breaking
Radiolysis
• lattice atom vibrations (phonons)
Sample heating
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201957
Challenges
Contamination
Primary example: Hydrocarbon build‐up on surface
Masks surface features and information about the sample
Sources
Sample surface
SEM chamber
Beam induced degradation and migration of sample compounds
Plasma cleaning sample prior to observation
Use gloves when handling samples
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201958
Challenges
Charging
Occurs in non‐conducting samples (also in samples that are not well grounded)
Charging deflects the low‐energy secondary electrons causing image distortions and contrast changes
Ways to mitigate charging
Coat the sample
Work at low kV
Use low currents (noisy images)
Use the “magic” charge neutrality voltage
Use high working chamber pressures (environmental SEM)
Charge compensation devices
Positive charging
Negative charging
Accelerating voltage
Total yield (SE + BSE)
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201959
Challenges ‐ Charging
Dark halodecreased SE collection
Dust particles on a metallic substrate
SE SE
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201960
Challenges ‐ Charging
Uncoated quartz fragment – 1kV ETD with positive bias
Depends on:‐ material properties (surface resistivity)‐ beam conditions (beam energy, current, and scan rate)
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Enviromental SEM
Modified FEI quanta 200:• Available gases (mass flow controller): H2, O2, N2, CO, NH3, C2H4
• Pressure up to 800Pa (8mbar)• Temperature: up to 1000°C• QMS Mass Spectrometer
Slide courtesy of S. Poitel, LSME‐EPFL
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Enviromental SEM
Anode under Redox cycling
Redox Cycling between O2 and H2 at 800°CSample: SOFC anode made of YSZ (yttrium stabilised Zirconium) and Ni (which is reduced and oxidised at each cycle)
Slide courtesy of S. Poitel, LSME‐EPFL
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019
Enviromental SEM
48 hours oxidation under 33 Pa of oxygen at 880°CSample: SOFC interconnect made of steel and coated with Co and Cerium.
Slide courtesy of S. Poitel, LSME‐EPFL
SOFC coated interconnect oxidation
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201964
Focused Ion Beam
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201965
Focused Ion Beam
Nano fabrication
AFM tip
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201966
Focused Ion Beam
Cross‐sectioning SEM imaging
Failure analysis
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201967
Focused Ion Beam
Insertion of electrical connection:1) Removal of isolating layer (milling)2) Pt deposition (FIB deposition)
Deposition
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201968
Electron backscatter diffraction ‐ EBSD
Electron backscatter diffraction is an electron diffraction technique in scanning electron microscopy used to obtain information about crystallographic phase, crystal orientation and defect densities.left: EBSD pattern of Nb (15 kV) right: Geometric set‐up of an EBSD measurement system
© Max‐Planck‐Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 201969
EBSD‐based orientation mapping
A (scanning) electron microscopy technique which measures crystal orientations on a regular grid by electron diffraction. The so‐determined data are used to produce orientation or phase maps of the scanned area on the sample.
lateral resolution: 20 to 100 nm (depending on the sample material); measurement rate currently up to hundreds of patterns per second; Investigated areas: few µm² to few cm². Angular resolution: 0.5°down to 0.01° with special techniques (‐>XR EBSD). The technique can also be extended into a 3D technique (‐> grain boundaries).
© Max‐Planck‐Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH
Emad Oveisi I SEM techniques – April 2019