scott massing methods platform exercise
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Scott Massing Methods Platform Exercise
1/6
DesignMethodsPlatform
Prospec-tive
Student
Activity
Need
Insight
GraduatingStudent
StudentEntryLevel
Practioner
Evaluate schools,programs, and
disciplines.
Determine spe-cialization, or
augmenting skillset to study.
Many dontknow there are
alternatives to anMBA, or searchterms to explore
Temporary ac-cess to SeeID-
style methodpreviews, synony-mous term links,method compari-
tor
Learning meth-ods, diving in,
trying them
Gain experience,learn by doing,
alignment tocourses taken,
Curation needed,uncommunicatedmethod evolution,random curricu-lum progression
Full access tocurated methodslibrary, templates,
and tutorials
Preparing portfo-lio, interviewing,
selling your value
Differentiate fromothers (ID, MBA),explaining designmethods & IDs
program
ID is self-selecting, non-af liates need
introduction andvalidation to
Public methodsportfolio showing
5 star examples &student-author
Merging intoproprietary pro-
cesses unfamiliarwith methods
Establish cred-ibility, feel securein employment,
demonstratevalue
Lone-ID-alumsneed help sellingthe value - evenat design rms,
culture change ishard
Exclusive ac-cess to methodscase studies inexchange for
providing futurecases
Expert
Driving procesleading others
turning the shihiring collabor
tors
Teach others ithe org, de nemetrics, open
innovation, grocompany
Many expertreturn to teach scout talent at
deeper level
Portal for pro
ect sponsorshipexclusive RecruID access, ran
student work
t Massing | Communication Strategy | Kim Erwin | Spring 2013
Design Methods Platform
Student User Journey
-
8/10/2019 Scott Massing Methods Platform Exercise
2/6
Design Methods are like
Often we dont communicate what we mean Design Methods help optimize communication
Some confuse design methods to be formulaic insight calculators, when their real value comesfrom the communication required to populate them. This communication is what helps identifyinsights and expose the opportunity.
Scott Massing | Communication Strategy | Kim Erwin | Spring 2013
ESP for collaborators
-
8/10/2019 Scott Massing Methods Platform Exercise
3/6
-
8/10/2019 Scott Massing Methods Platform Exercise
4/6
Scott Massing | Communication Strategy | Kim Erwin | Spring 2013
Communication Plan
Engagement participants:
Full time ID students: a homogenous group that through the self-selecting onboarding process at ID
arrive already believing in the value of learning and using design methodology. Because of a lack ofnaysayers in their learning environment, they may not develop the skills required to introduce and
justify the value created by the methods, or realize those skills may be critical towards initiating theirpractice after graduation.
Engagement goal (What do I want them to do?):
Better understand how some external stakeholders, not as familiar with design methodology, may ormay not perceive ID and its methodology. Building upon that experience, they would beginconceptualizing features of a platform to bridge this gap of misunderstanding, and afterwards bemotivated to provide seed content for a self-sustaining design methods platform.
Key Message:
Design methodologies are powerful tools, but involve a skillset foreign to many outside the designindustry. Working to understand the existing value systems related to innovation will benefit all designstudents, even those targeting employment amongst the design savvy in a consultancy, as you may needto convince a corporate client why she needs to pay for phases of work they do not understand.
-
8/10/2019 Scott Massing Methods Platform Exercise
5/6
-
8/10/2019 Scott Massing Methods Platform Exercise
6/6
Scott Massing | Communication Strategy | Kim Erwin | Spring 2013
school would or would not benefit their company, and also to record any remaining questions theydlike answered.
The recruiters will also be asked to interview their companys executive responsible for innovation, and
determine what their thoughts are on sponsoring a semester long class of graduate students to reinvent
a segment of the business or product line. Theyd also be asked to obtain 3 key questions that wouldneed to be answered to secure funding of the sponsorship.
The 3 ID students will again remain at their stations with the recruiters speed dating around the circle ofstations, 20 minutes per station. The ID student will interview, the recruiter for 7 minutes about their
interview goals, HR needs, and understanding of the program and its emerging graduates. The studentwill then present their work for 3 minutes and then review and record similar aspects as they did withthe prospective students (10 minutes) .
The recruiters needs will be captured and adhered to side C of the cubes from earlier. The
corresponding answers, presentation benefits, an d suggestions for tools to augment comprehension goon side D. The remaining sides are reserved for the results of the Innovation Executive Exercise next.
Innovation Executive Elevator Pitch Exercise
The 3 ID students will again remain at their stations with the recruiters speed dating around the circle ofstations, 20 minutes per station. The ID student will interview the recruiter about what their executives
3 key questions were regarding sponsorship and then the two will work together for 10 minutes tocreate a short 1 minute elevator pitch. The recruiter will play the executive and the student therecruiter. They will get up and stand in the foam core elevator (2 sheets of 4x8 foam core in thecorner) and quickly show how the recruiter should convince the exec that they stand to benefit from
sponsoring a challenge at ID. Addressing each question with a solution provided by the platform.
The 3 questions will go on side E, with the rebuttals going on side F.
Wrap up
The cubes represent the platform, with opposite sides being the inputs and outputs with respect todifferent stakeholder groups. All the stakeholder groups mentioned in the exercise are fairly extremenon-users of our methodology, but if satisfied would ensure stakeholders with a higher alignment would
by default also be satisfied. The follow-up work would be to determine how the needs of onestakeholder group could be met by another, so that a self-sustaining platform could be created. For
example, the students would be encouraged to submit work if it were publicly viewed by recruiters.This in turn would help prospective students see what they would learn if they attended ID. This type ofsynergy is what is being sought in potential platform concepts.