sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Patient-centered dissemination of
evidence-based medicineA Journey Toward Shared Decision Making
![Page 2: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Encounter Research
![Page 3: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 5: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Compared to usual care,
patients using the decision aid were
22 times more likely
to have an accurate sense of their baseline
risk and risk reduction with statins.
Weymiller et al. Arch Intern Med 2007
![Page 6: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Osteoporosis Choice
Montori et al, AJM 2011
![Page 7: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
AMI Choice
![Page 8: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Chest Pain Choice
Hess et al. Circ 2012
![Page 9: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Mullan et al, Arch Intern Med 2009
Diabetes Medication Choice
Video / Web
![Page 10: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Depression Medication Choice
LeBlanc 2012
![Page 12: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ExamplesDecision aid Evaluation
Risk communication tools
Statin Choice (primary care) Feasible, effective
Independently validated
Multicenter trial completed
Implemented in EHR
Chest pain Choice (emergency) Feasible, effective (Emergency)
Multicenter trial seeking funding
Aspirin Choice (primary care) Implemented in EHR without evaluation
Osteoporosis Choice (primary care) Feasible, effective
EHR implementation ongoing
PCI Choice (cardiology) Ongoing
AMI Choice (hospital) Feasible, effective (hospital)
Issue cards
DM2 Med Choice Feasible, effective
Multicenter trial ongoing
Implemented in EHR
Depression Choice Ongoing
![Page 13: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The body of evidence
Systematic review of 115 RCTs
Compared to usual care, decision aids:
Increase patient involvement by 34% (+++-)
Increase patient knowledge of options by 13% (++++)
Increase consultation time by ~2.6 minutes
Reduce decisional conflict by ~7%
Reduce % undecided by 40%
No consistent effect on choice, adherence,
health outcomes or costs
Stacey D et al. Cochrane review 2014
![Page 14: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Summary of Mayo experience
Age: 40-92 (avg 65)
Primary care, ED, hospital, specialty care
74-90% clinicians want to use tools again
Adds ~3 minutes to consultation
60% fidelity without training
20% improvement in patient knowledge
17% improvement in patient involvement
Variable clinical outcomes
![Page 15: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Conclusions
• It is feasible to promote evidence-based
conversations during the clinical encounters
with patients with chronic conditions.
• Decision aids designed for this purpose are
efficient and effective in promoting shared
decision making.
• Tools tested in randomized trials and proven
effective are available for free.
• Partners to get to routine use in practice.
![Page 17: Sdm short 15_min_with_voice_over](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052623/559b9d671a28ab0d448b46ae/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
ShareEBMPatient-centered dissemination of evidence-based medicine
http://www.share-ebm.org/
Mayo Clinic KER Unit (http://shareddecisions.mayoclinic.org)
Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (https://www.icsi.org/)