seabird displacement at the bligh bank offshore wind farm n. vanermen, t. onkelinx, w. courtens, m....
TRANSCRIPT
Seabird displacement at the Bligh Bank offshore wind farm
N. Vanermen, T. Onkelinx, W. Courtens, M. Van de walle, H. Verstraete & E.W.M. Stienen
IMCC, Glasgow 16 August 2014
Seabirds and offshore wind farms
2
Barrier to migration &
local flight movements
Habitat change
Increased mortality due to collision fatalities
Seabirds and offshore wind farms
3
Habitat change
Attraction? Avoidance?
4
Monitoring seabird displacement
Ship-based seabird surveys according to the internationally applied ESAS methodology (Tasker,
1984)
5
Monitoring displacement effects:
BACI set-upBEFORE AFTER
1.
2.
3.
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
control control
impact impact
Before After
6
Monitoring displacement effects:
monitoring route
7
Monitoring displacement effects:
data modelingStatistical challenges inherent to ‘seabirds at sea’ data
• Auto-correlation in time and space> aggregation of transect data to day totals per
control/impact area
• Overdispersion > use of a negative binomial distribution
• High proportion of zero counts > accounting for zero-inflation
ZINB modelling
8
Monitoring displacement effects:
data modelingSeasonal variation modelled by a cyclic sine curve:Little gull (12 month period 2 degrees of freedom)
9
Monitoring displacement effects:
data modelingSeasonal variation modelled by a cyclic sine curve:Razorbill (12 month period 2 degrees of freedom)
10
Monitoring displacement effects:
data modelingSeasonal variation modelled by the sum of 2 cyclic sine curves:Black-legged kittiwake (12 + 4 month period 4 degrees of freedom)
11
Monitoring displacement effects:
results Bligh Bank
12
Monitoring displacement effects:
results Bligh Bank
Impact area (OWF + 0.5 km)
Impact area (OWF + 3 km)
Buffer area (0.5 - 3 km)
Coeff. P-value Coeff. P-value Coeff. P-value
Northern fulmar -16.62 0.987 -17.20 0.986 -16.49 0.987
Northern gannet -1.92 0.000*** -1.53 0.000*** -1.16 0.003**
Great skua -16.21 0.995 -16.95 0.994 -16.25 0.995
Little gull -1.15 0.270 -0.13 0.891 0.31 0.730
Common gull 1.91 0.155 1.19 0.332 -0.27 0.805
Lesser black-backed gull 1.66 0.012* 2.71 0.000*** 2.71 0.000***
Herring gull 2.25 0.001*** 0.89 0.201 0.37 0.580
Great black-backed gull 0.38 0.419 0.42 0.310 0.48 0.293
Black-legged kittiwake 0.04 0.930 0.25 0.527 0.47 0.255
Common guillemot -1.23 0.000*** -0.94 0.000*** -0.75 0.007**
Razorbill -1.01 0.031* -0.76 0.080. -0.39 0.378
1
13
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
Before After
Mod
elle
d de
nsity
(n/
km²)
Northern gannet
0,0
1,5
3,0
4,5
6,0
Before After
Mod
elle
d de
nsity
(n/
km²)
Common guillemot
0,0
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
Before After
Mod
elle
d de
nsity
(n/
km²)
Razorbill
Control area
Impact area
Monitoring displacement effects:
results Bligh Bank
SIGNIFICANT AVOIDANCE EFFECTS-85%
-71% -64%
14
Monitoring displacement effects:
results Bligh Bank
SIGNIFICANT ATTRACTION EFFECTS
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
Before After
Mod
elle
d de
nsity
(n/
km²)
Herring gull
0,0
1,0
2,0
3,0
4,0
5,0
Before After
Mod
elle
d de
nsity
(n/
km²)
Lesser black-backed gull
Control area
Impact area
x 9,5 x 5,3
15
Observed attraction effects:ecological incentives??
Roosting possibilities (!)Food availability (?)
16
to like…
…or not to like?
Observed attraction effects:
17
Observed attraction effects:THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!Any questions?