search for direct top squark pair production in events ... · all limits at 95% cl lep limit...
TRANSCRIPT
Intro
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Search for direct top squark pair productionin events with two tau leptons
with the ATLAS detector
Ewan Hill
University of Victoria + TRIUMF
June 15 2016
Ewan Hill
1 / 14
Intro
Why
SUSY
ATLAS SUSY
Signal
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
ATLAS is searching for “new physics” to explainsome open questions about the Standard Model
Dark matter
Hierarchy problemEwan Hill
2 / 14
Intro
Why
SUSY
ATLAS SUSY
Signal
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Supersymmetry to the rescue
Supersymmetry fixing SM:
I G̃ = dark matter candidate
I top squark (“stop”, t̃) helps with hierarchy problemEwan Hill
3 / 14
Intro
Why
SUSY
ATLAS SUSY
Signal
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Many SUSY searches performed by ATLAS,including for top squarks
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CombinedSummaryPlots/SUSY/
Ewan Hill
4 / 14
Intro
Why
SUSY
ATLAS SUSY
Signal
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Search for top squark to tau slepton signal over tt̄background
Signal (GMSB)
t̃
t̃
τ̃
τ̃
p
p
b ν
G̃
τ
νb
G̃
τ
σ(t̃t̃∗) ∼ 0.5 pb, m(t̃) = 500 GeV
Dominant background
t
t
W
W
p
p
b `
ν
b
ν
τhad
σ(tt̄) ∼ 8× 102 pb
I G̃/ν = undetected → EmissT
I Final state objects:
I 2 b-jetsI Emiss
TI 0− 2 e or µI 2− 0 τhad
Channels:
I lepton–lepton = 2 e or µ
I lepton–hadron =1 τhad and (1 e or µ)
I hardon–hadron = 2 τhadEwan Hill
5 / 14
Intro
Method
Analysis method
Variables
Signal regions
SR cuts
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Selection cuts isolate regions of phase space tomaximize/minimize signal to background
Just count # events in phase space regions:
I Control: scale simulation to data for dominant backgrounds
I Validation: check scaling
I Signal: maximized signal to background
Analysis blinded to reduce human bias
Data set from 2012: 8 TeV, 20fb−1Ewan Hill
6 / 14
Intro
Method
Analysis method
Variables
Signal regions
SR cuts
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Several kinematic variables separate signal frombackground
Signal
t̃
t̃
τ̃
τ̃
p
p
b ν
G̃
τ
νb
G̃
τ
Dominant background
t
t
W
W
p
p
b `
ν
b
ν
τhad
I Number of b-jets
I Probes of decaying particles’ masses, e.g. mT2 (b`,bτ)
I mT2(a,b)=
√min
qaT
+qbT
=pmissT
(max[m2T(pa
T,qaT),m2
T(pbT,qb
T)])
I Sums/ratios of momenta e.g.
I HT = pjet1T + pjet2T
Ip`T+pτT∑alli pT(i)Ewan Hill
7 / 14
Intro
Method
Analysis method
Variables
Signal regions
SR cuts
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Design analyses around unknown signal masses:m(t̃) and m(τ̃)
m(t̃) =? m(τ̃) =? m(G̃)� 1 GeVEwan Hill
8 / 14
Intro
Method
Analysis method
Variables
Signal regions
SR cuts
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Main cuts separating each channel/SR aremT2(t)→ m(t̃) and mT2(W )→ m(τ̃)
I SRHM mT2(W ) > 120 GeV vs SRHH mT2(W ) > 50 GeV
I SRHM mT2(t) > 180 GeV vs SRHH all top squark masses
I 2 leptons mT2(W ) and jet pT & multiplicity
I SRLM mT2(t) < 60 GeV vs SRHH all top squark massesEwan Hill
9 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
mT2 (b`, bτ)SRL
mT2 (`, τ)SRH
Results
Conclusions
Backup
t mass-probing variable
notNeededQuestionMark
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Eve
nts
/ 20
GeV
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
510
610-1 = 8 TeV, 20.3 fbs
ATLAS
Preselection SRLM
Data 2012SM Backgroundtop fake taustop true taus
ν l→W Other
)=(391,148) GeV1τ∼,1t~m(
)=(195,87) GeV1τ∼,1t~m(
) [GeV]hadτ(bl,bT2m
0 100 200 300 400 500 600Dat
a / M
C
00.5
11.5
2
≥
mT2(t) = mT2 (b`,bτ)
Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 1-30, 2016
Ewan Hill
10 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
mT2 (b`, bτ)SRL
mT2 (`, τ)SRH
Results
Conclusions
Backup
W mass-probing variable
notNeededQuestionMark
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Eve
nts
/ 20
GeV
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
510
610-1 = 8 TeV, 20.3 fbs
ATLAS
Preselection SRHM
Data 2012SM Backgroundtop fake taustop true taus
ν l→W Other
)=(391,148) GeV1τ∼,1t~m(
)=(195,87) GeV1τ∼,1t~m(
) [GeV]hadτ(l,T2m
0 50 100 150 200 250 300Dat
a / M
C
00.5
11.5
2
≥
mT2(W ) = mT2 (`, τ)
Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 1-30, 2016
Ewan Hill
11 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
Results
SR counts
CombinedExclusion
Conclusions
Backup
No excesses seen in any signal region
Analysis Expected bkgd Observed(nom. ± stat. & syst.)
Lepton–hadron low massSRLM 22.1± 4.7 20Lepton–hadron high massSRHM 2.1± 1.5 3Hadron–hadronSRHH 3.1± 1.2 3
2-leptons channel has many SRs : no excess.
Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 1-30, 2016Ewan Hill
12 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
Results
SR counts
CombinedExclusion
Conclusions
Backup
Use SR/channel that gives best expected CLs forcombination
[GeV]1
t~m
200 300 400 500 600 700
[GeV
]1τ∼
m
100
200
300
400
500
600
700-1 = 8 TeV, 20 fbs
) = 1G~
τ →1
τ∼) = 1, BR(νb1τ∼ → 1t~
production, BR(1t~1t
~
ATLAS
)theory
SUSYσ1 ±Observed limit (
)expσ1 ±Expected limit (
LEP limit
All limits at 95% CL
Combination
Num
bers
indi
cate
bes
t exp
ecte
d S
R
1τ∼ + m
b < m1t~m
1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2
2
2 2 5 5 2 2 2 2 5 2
35 5 5 5 5 2 2 5 5 53
35 5 5 2 5 5 5 53
33 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
35 5 5 5 5 5
35 5 5 5
3 5 5 5 5
5
5 5
5
1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2
2
2 2 5 5 2 2 2 2 5 2
35 5 5 5 5 2 2 5 5 53
35 5 5 2 5 5 5 53
33 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
35 5 5 5 5 5
35 5 5 5
3 5 5 5 5
5
5 5
5
3=lepton–lepton 5=lepton–hadron high mass1=lepton–hadron low mass 2=hadron–hadron
Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 1-30, 2016
Ewan Hill
13 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Summary
Backup
Summary
I Top squark could help fix an open problem in the StandardModel
I Low and high t̃ masses probed as a function of the τ̃ mass
I No excesses observed.
I Set limits on m(t̃) as a function of m(τ̃)
I Heaviest top squark mass excluded ∼ 660 GeV
I Expecting ∼ 25fb−1 this year
I Should be sensitive to m(t̃) ∼ 800 GeV
Ewan Hill
14 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Regional Cuts
mT2 UpperLimits
Real/fake τEstimation
SRLM Exclusion
SRHM Exclusion
SRHH Exclusion
SRLL Exclusion
Region cuts are all orthogonal to each other
Region N⌧had Nµ Njet Nb�jet EmissT ��(j1,2, p
missT ) mT2(⌧had, `) msum
T (⌧had, `)
SRHH 2 0 � 2 � 1 > 150 GeV � 0.5 > 50 GeV > 160 GeVCRHHTop 1 1 � 2 � 1 > 100 GeV � 0.5 - [70,120] GeV
CRHHWjets 1 1 � 2 0 > 100 GeV � 0.5 < 40 GeV [80,120] GeVVRHHTop 1 1 � 2 � 1 > 120 GeV � 0.5 < 40 GeV [120,140] GeV
VRHHWjets 1 1 � 2 0 > 120 GeV � 0.5 < 40 GeV [120,150] GeV
CRHHQCD � 2a 0 � 2 � 1 > 150 GeV 0.5b - -
aFor the multi-jet control region (CRHHQCD), no identification criteria are applied to tau leptons.bThe �� requirement only applies to the sub-leading jet j2.
Region Nb−jet HT/meffp`T+p
τhadT
meffmT2(b`, b) mT2(b`, bτhad) mT(`, p
missT ) meff
SRLM ≥ 2 < 0.5 > 0.2 < 100 GeV < 60 GeV - -CRTtLM ≥ 2 - > 0.2 < 100 GeV 110− 160 GeV > 100 GeV -CRTfLM ≥ 2 - > 0.2 < 100 GeV 110− 160 GeV < 100 GeV -CRWLM 0 < 0.5 > 0.2 - - > 40 GeV < 400 GeVVRTLM ≥ 2 > 0.5 > 0.2 < 100 GeV 60− 110 GeV - -
Region Nb−jet EmissT meff HT/meff mT2(b`, bτhad) mT2(`, τhad) mT(`, p
missT )
SRHM ≥ 1 > 150 GeV > 400 GeV < 0.5 > 180 GeV > 120 GeV -CRTtHM ≥ 1 > 150 GeV > 400 GeV < 0.5 > 180 GeV 20-80 GeV > 120 GeVCRTfHM ≥ 1 > 150 GeV > 400 GeV < 0.5 > 180 GeV 20-80 GeV < 120 GeVCRWHM 0 > 150 GeV > 400 GeV < 0.5 - 20-80 GeV 40-100 GeVVRHM ≥ 1 < 150 GeV > 400 GeV < 0.5 > 180 GeV > 80 GeV -
Ewan Hill
15 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Regional Cuts
mT2 UpperLimits
Real/fake τEstimation
SRLM Exclusion
SRHM Exclusion
SRHH Exclusion
SRLL Exclusion
mT2 Upper Limits
t̃
t̃
τ̃
τ̃
p
p
b ν
G̃
τ
νb
G̃
τ
mT2 Max Value for Max Value forSignal tt̄ background
mT2 (b`,bτ) top squark mass top mass
amT2 (b`,b) top mass
mT2 (`, τ) If chargino not virtual W mass(not true here):chargino mass
Ewan Hill
16 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Regional Cuts
mT2 UpperLimits
Real/fake τEstimation
SRLM Exclusion
SRHM Exclusion
SRHH Exclusion
SRLL Exclusion
Fake and τ background estimation done with MC
I Fit for tt̄(τ true), tt̄(τfake), and W+jets seperately in thebackground-only fit with a CR for each.
I W+jets CRs: Use b-veto to isolate.
I tt̄ CRs: Use an mT2 variable to isolate tt̄ and then m`T to distinguish
true and fake taus.
I The same-sign method (tau has same sign charge as e/µ) was alsotested
Summary of results:
I Both methods give similar results to within the uncertainties.
I MC method was chosen because of a lack of statistics in thesame-sign method.
Ewan Hill
17 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Regional Cuts
mT2 UpperLimits
Real/fake τEstimation
SRLM Exclusion
SRHM Exclusion
SRHH Exclusion
SRLL Exclusion
Exclusion plot for lepton-hadron Low Mass channel
[GeV]1
t~m
160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250
[GeV
]1τ∼
m
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
-1 = 8 TeV, 20.3 fbs
) = 1G~
τ →1
τ∼) = 1, BR(νb1τ∼ → 1t~
production, BR(1t~1t
~
ATLAS
)theory
SUSYσ1 ±Observed limit (
)expσ1 ±Expected limit (
LEP limit
All limits at 95% CL
Lepton-hadron SRLM
1τ∼ + mb < m
1t~m
Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 1-30, 2016Ewan Hill
18 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Regional Cuts
mT2 UpperLimits
Real/fake τEstimation
SRLM Exclusion
SRHM Exclusion
SRHH Exclusion
SRLL Exclusion
Exclusion plot for lepton-hadron High Mass channel
[GeV]1
t~m
200 300 400 500 600 700
[GeV
]1τ∼
m
100
200
300
400
500
600
700-1 = 8 TeV, 20.3 fbs
) = 1G~
τ →1
τ∼) = 1, BR(νb1τ∼ → 1t~
production, BR(1t~1t
~
ATLAS
)theory
SUSYσ1 ±Observed limit (
)expσ1 ±Expected limit (
LEP limit
All limits at 95% CL
Lepton-hadron SRHM
1τ∼ + m
b < m1t~m
Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 1-30, 2016Ewan Hill
19 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Regional Cuts
mT2 UpperLimits
Real/fake τEstimation
SRLM Exclusion
SRHM Exclusion
SRHH Exclusion
SRLL Exclusion
Exclusion plot for hadron-hadron channel
[GeV]1
t~m
200 300 400 500 600 700
[GeV
]1τ∼
m
100
200
300
400
500
600
700-1 = 8 TeV, 20.1 fbs
) = 1G~
τ →1
τ∼) = 1, BR(νb1τ∼ → 1t~
production, BR(1t~1t
~
ATLAS
)theory
SUSYσ1 ±Observed limit (
)expσ1 ±Expected limit (
LEP limit
All limits at 95% CL
Hadron-hadron
1τ∼ + m
b < m1t~m
Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 1-30, 2016Ewan Hill
20 / 14
Intro
Method
Plots
Results
Conclusions
Backup
Regional Cuts
mT2 UpperLimits
Real/fake τEstimation
SRLM Exclusion
SRHM Exclusion
SRHH Exclusion
SRLL Exclusion
Exclusion plot for lepton-lepton channel
[GeV]1
t~m
200 300 400 500 600 700
[GeV
]1τ∼
m
100
200
300
400
500
600
700-1 = 8 TeV, 20.3 fbs
) = 1G~
τ →1
τ∼) = 1, BR(νb1τ∼ → 1t~
production, BR(1t~1t
~
ATLAS
)theory
SUSYσ1 ±Observed limit (
)expσ1 ±Expected limit (
LEP limit
All limits at 95% CL
Lepton-lepton
1τ∼ + m
b < m1t~m
Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 1-30, 2016Ewan Hill
21 / 14