section i presentations · april 16 –dry run presentation april 23 –final presentation pdr...
TRANSCRIPT
Project Schedule, PDR ReviewSchedule
March 28 – Design Freeze, Report Outline
Week of March 10, 12 – CDR
March 26 – Action Item Closeout
April 3 – Rough Draft Due, Revisions Begin
April 9 – Final Report Due
April 16 – Dry Run Presentation
April 23 – Final Presentation
PDR Review – Going into CDR
March 13 – Action Item Assignment
Week of March 24, 26 – Writing Workshop
Week of March 31, Apr 2 – Writing Workshop 2
• PDR went exceptionally well! All designs
are nearing a completed state.
• Moving forward, emphasize configuration,
orientation, and interaction.
• Final mass, power and volume numbers
should be set within a 10% range.
• All the aforementioned should be nearly
finalized.
• All CAD models should look as real as
possible – designs should have no more
placeholders or generic “space grey”
coloring.
• Animations should be in work or completed.
Animations/Sims Needed for CDR and Final Pres.
- ED Tether Spin up and launch (scaled down)
List of Animations
- Cycler rotation and vehicle movement (with and
without taxis)
- Mass Driver Launch
- Taxi re-entry profile, Mars
- Cycler docking taxis
Report Info
- Tether operation for each location (Luna, Phobos,
Mars) – rendezvous closeup included
- Landing track use once Martian tether spins down
- Communication Satellite movement to
illustrate zero outage
List of Simulations
- All legs of the mission from Earth LEO to Mars
touchdown and vice versa
- Cycler orbit over time
- Macro scale depiction of taxi rendezvous with
other systems
- If you think of other things that could be
animated/simulated, add to “List of Animations” in
PM/APM folder on Drive.
- Writing workshops to come after Spring Break.
- Make sure that you’re hanging on to all the
analysis you do. Everything that we have
investigated will go into the report in some way.
Tether SystemsObjective: To provide a visualization of the Tether Sling & ED - Tether
Requirements:• Phobos Tether Sling (Base Design): Design 80% Complete
• Luna Tether Sling
• Has crawler/gondola system attached.
• Hollow torque arm to provide access to the hub center.
• All Tether Slings
• A design on taxi docking mechanism.
• A more realistic look and a sense of scale.
• Design on support structure and anchoring system.
Additional Items:• Started compiling animation sequences.
• Need to start creating individual and integrated animations of the system.
Tether Sling (Current Model)
Tether Sling (Isometric)Animation Work in Progress
Scale 1:10000
Tether Sling (Exploded View)
Burj Khalifa 828 m
Motor-Hub System
Communications Satellites Dimensioning & Sizing
L4/5 Satellite Frame Dimensions
Created by Hanson-Lee Harjono - CAD
Component Mass Volume
Stationary Orbit
Satellite Frames
2.043 Mg 0.754 m^3
L4/5 Satellite Frames 2.384 Mg 0.88 m^3
GEO Solar Panels 0.246 Mg 0.091 m^3
AREO Solar Panels 0.464 Mg 0.171 m^3
L4/5 Solar Panels 0.478 Mg 0.176 m^3
Modeled Masses and VolumesDrafting Diagrams
Satellite Rendering
GEO Satellite Rendering by Hanson-Lee Harjono, CAD
Next Steps:
Solar panel – Satellite frame connection
RF Dish – Satellite frame connection
Telescope – Satellite frame joint
Telescope length with mirror
Internal layout
Work out masses and sizes
CONTINUOUS COMMUNICATION ON THE CYCLER
Customer Requirements:
• Continuous Line-of-Sight between RF antenna on cycler and receiver on taxi
CAD and Image Credit: Aaron Engstrom
RF antennae will be on
either end of the cycler’s
superstructure on
opposite axes, to ensure
no blockage and
continuous line of sight.
CONTINUOUS COMMUNICATION FROM GROUND STATIONS TO RELAY SATELLITES
New Earth Ground Station:
New Lunar Ground Stations:
Location Antenna Diameter Power Required
UNSW, Sydney, Australia 22 meters 0.59 Watts
This location in Australia allows us to have a ground station on either side of the globe, ensuring
complete line-of-sight to all relay satellites in GEO.
Location Antenna Diameter
North Pole of the Moon 10 meters
Phobos 10 meters
These locations ensure direct
line-of-sight to relay satellites in
GEO and at different Lagrange
points.
Problem
• How does the radome material affect the link budget?
• How does the TPS affect the link budget?
• Requirements
• 4 dB gain margin
• < 1kW transmission power
• Minimum range: 16,000 km
• (Maximum theoretical distance from Taxi to
Phobos)
Solution
• Quartz fibre composite radome with TPS
• Radome path loss
• Dominated by TPS interference, not Quartz fibre
• 2 dB loss during spaceflight [2]
• Blackout is likely during reentry due to ionization
Parameter Internal Antenna
Mass [1] 1.25 kg
Power [3][4] 328 W
Diameter 0.5 m
Receiver Maximum Range
Phobos Ground Station 89,000 km
Cycler 30,000 km
The Problem: We Need a Controller to Catch a Taxi With the Tether Slings
Assumptions:
• The tether will spin with a constant angular
velocity unless a torque is applied.
• All excess stress felt by the crew is dampened.
• Max torque available in 16GNm
• Reference frame is stationary.
• The Tether is already spun up 0.0385𝑜/𝑠Goals:
• To be able to meet the taxi with a tether arm as
it flies by
• Can adjust itself to taxi trajectory
Illustrations by Alexander Chapa
Conclusion
I am able to catch the taxi
with the tether; however, this
would require a 28-hour
notice from the taxi for where
it will rendezvous.
I will debug the controller
itself and working on ways to
reduce the required call
ahead time
Problem: Verify the attitude control system for the cycler.
Requirements:
• Control for angular velocity.
• Ensure that the angular velocity never varies from the required value for 1 g
of acceleration.
• Model perturbations and observe response.
Need to Find:
• What kind of controller to use.
• Method of modeling cycler.
Results• Controller based off of change of angular velocity through accumulation of angular momentum
• Fairly quick response time.
• Verified performance with randomized torques simulating unexpected for perturbations.
Sarah CulpFebruary 13, 2020
Human FactorsCycler and Taxi: Systems Integration and Additional
Safety Considerations
• Cycler: Advanced Closed Loop System (ACLS) and Bioregenerative Life Support
System (BLSS)• How are the ACLS and BLSS integrated? [2]
The Problems: Systems Integration and Safe Noise Levels
• Taxi: Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell and Crew Water Consumption • Can we entirely depend on water generated by the PEM Fuel Cell to provide for human
needs? [1]
1
2
• Both: Safe Noise Requirements• Any sounds above 82 dB (over the course of 150
days) can cause permanent hearing loss
• Noise levels above 68-70 dB cause headaches
• Sources: • Launch/ Entry
• Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (75.5 dBA),
flight hardware (75 dBA), Waste Management
Noise Requirement Level
Continuous Noise 58 dBA (Max)
Intermittent Noise (<=8
hours)
49 dBA (Max)
Sleep Noise Level 50 dBA (Max)
Launch / Entry 105 dBA (Max)
Word Intelligibility 78% (Min)
3
[1] Dean Lontoc, Taxi Power and Thermal
[2] Alexey Zenin, Cycler Human Factors
The Solution:
1
ACLS Per Cycler Module
Mass (Mg) 1.47
Volume (𝑚3) 5.4
Power (kW) 2.83
2
3
PEM Fuel Cell
+ 49.09 kg
H2O
Potable H2O
Storage Tank
Daily
Consumption
- 48 kg H2O
Wastewater
Storage Tank
H2
O2
Auxiliary Supply
Taxi: PEM Fuel Cell and Crew Water Consumption
• Entirety supplied by PEM, Safety Factor of
1.2 requires auxiliary supplyWater System Per Taxi (5 Days)
Mass (Mg) 0.360
Volume (𝑚3) 0.439
Power (kW) *In PEM Analysis [1]
+ 9.6 kg
• Auxiliary ACLS systems: supply ¼ of the required O2
and ¼ required N2 (3 units per cycler module)
• Assume 75% crop yield (~1.2 Safety Factor)
Cycler: ACLS and BLSS
Both: Noise Mitigation Noise
Mitigation
Taxi
(24 people)
Per Cycler
Module
Mass (Mg) 0.032 0.072
Volume (𝑚3) 0.966 2.28
• Entry/Launch: Active Noise Reduction Headsets
• Continuous Noise: Sound absorptive linings
surrounding historically loud systems
The Problem
Entertainment (cont.):
- Different ways of stimulating senses
- Easy communication with people on Earth
Maintenance:
- Need tools on cycler for Intravehicular
Activities (IVA) maintenance [1]
Housekeeping:
- Ways of keeping cycler clean for
long health of crew [2]
Drawing created by David Fox
Current Solution
Component Count Mass [kg] Power [kW] Volume [m3]
Computers/desks 4 79 0.26 1.76
iPad Pro 70 44.1 1.26 (while
charging)
0.025
Playing cards/board games 8 7.5 0 0.05
Maintenance IVA tool kit 2 77 0 0.15
Housekeeping items -- 56.4 2.4 (2 vacuums
in use)
0.466
Human Factors
Requirements:
● Understanding of microbes that may become malign in microgravity or
irradiated conditions
● Assessment of supplies, devices, and logistics for medical bay
countermeasures
Assumptions/Constraints:
● General lack of understanding of radiation effects outside of Earth’s
magnetic field
● Microgravity only needs to be considered for short taxi flight
Need to Determine:
● Quarantine procedures for illness or psychosis
● Layout of med bay
● Inclusion of new vaccines or antibiotics for microbes that may be
terrestrially benign
Problem: Precautions and equipment needed for pathogens and surgical/public health concerns
3-5% of
population
General
anxiety
45% of
anxiety
cases
Severe
1-2 people will
experience a panic
response
Human FactorsConclusions:
● Space panic and illness will be an issue in taxi
● Need studies on different microbes outside of
magnetic field in order to prepare
● Lab to perform diagnostic testing
● Need to bring medical gases (nitrous oxide)
● Dental procedures
● Only need to be able to quarantine 2 people
Nitrous Oxide Container Specs:
- Volume: 0.7 m3
- Mass: 30 kg
Operating table
Me
d
Ga
s M
edic
al S
upplie
s
Bed Bed
Fluid Management
Lab
Wo
rkbe
nch
Health Monitoring
Kaitlyn Hauber, Purdue University
Jennifer Bergeson
March 5, 2020
Discipline: Mission DesignVehicles and Systems: Cycler Orbit, Phobos
Tether Effects
The Problem: Determine Propellant Equivalent Delta V and Feasibility of Phobos Use
ΔV saved by tethers: Impact of tether on Phobos:Assumptions: Assumptions:
Any launch/return plane available Tether mass concentrated at 𝑟
3
Propulsion has Martian orbit to surface propellant Tether & Phobos axes aligned
Requirements: Requirements:
No use of tether Determine if Phobos will be despun
Find ΔV for each segment Determine if Phobos will explodeMarsTaxi
Earth
Cycler
ω
TaxiTether
Phobos
Numerical Results
Taxi Segment Average ΔV for Each
Segment (km/s)
LEO to Cycler (outbound) 4.30
Cycler to LMO (outbound) 3.18
LMO to Cycler (inbound) 2.80
Cycler to LEO (inbound) 4.88
Taxi Segment Max ΔV for Each
Segment (km/s)
LEO to Cycler (outbound) 4.65
Cycler to LMO (outbound) 3.83
LMO to Cycler (inbound) 3.55
Cycler to LEO (inbound) 5.18
ω𝑝ℎ𝑜𝑏𝑜𝑠 = 1.823 ∗ 10−4𝑟𝑎𝑑
𝑠ω𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑒 = 2.23 ∗ 10−3
𝑟𝑎𝑑
𝑠
The Problem: Feasibility of Earth-Mars Transfers from Tether
Requirements:
• ∆𝑉 ≤ 5𝑘𝑚
𝑠
• Reasonable TOF (less than 1 year)
Assumptions:
• The Sun is the only force during
interplanetary trip.
• Moon/Phobos gravity ignored within
Earth/Mars systems.
Need to Determine
• ∆𝑉 from Moon and Phobos tether for each
part of the voyage.
Solution and Results
• 6 and 8 Month trips without passengers
from Earth to Mars are possible with
current tether design.
Trip and TOF Phobos ΔV
(km/s)
Luna ΔV (km/s)
Earth-Mars 6
Months
1.28 2.80
Earth-Mars 8
Months
2.22 2.57
Mars-Earth 6
Months
5.50 8.07
Mars-Earth 8
Months
5.49 7.35
Problem & Assumptions
Requirements• Getting payload/passengers from sling
to hub
• Define forces involved in this process
• Time of transport
Assumptions• Docking velocity
• Mars = 5 km/s
• Luna = 2 km/s
• Elevator velocity 150 m/s
• No drag included
Need to Determine• Velocity at each radial point of tether
• Centripetal forces at each point
• Time on elevator
Limitations
• Forces dependent on mass
• Tether lengths TBD
• Docking velocity TBD
Liquid Helium Cooling System for the CradleThe Problem:
Magnets need to be cooled at 10K
Need to Determine:
Method of Cooling
Coolant Type
Mass, Power, Volume
Credit: Erick Smith
Coolant Type Coldest Liquid Temperature
R-134a 293 K
Liquid Nitrogen 78 K
Liquid Helium 4 K
Cradle Thermal SystemVacuum Sealed Thermal System helps
reduce conductive and convective heat
generation.
Magnet
Va
cu
um
Liquid Helium
Ou
tsid
e
Vacuum
Con
de
nser
System Specifications Values
Mass 25,000 kg
Volume 200 m3
Power 700 W
Problem: That’s a lot of heat
Focus: Further refine power supply and determine configuration & size of system
necessary to dissipate heat generation
Objectives:
- Find best type & shape of radiator
for motor heat dissipation
- Find operating temp of solar panels
- Determine its configuration relative
to other components
- Slowly eliminate arrays of
possibilities
Array Size (km²) based on GW req
20 40 60 80 100
169.90 339.81 509.71 679.61 849.52
155.34 310.68 466.02 621.36 776.70
321.71 643.42 965.13 1286.84 1608.55
Array Size (km²) based on MW req
20 40 60 80 100
0.17 0.34 0.51 0.68 0.85
0.16 0.31 0.47 0.62 0.78
0.32 0.64 0.97 1.29 1.61
Radiation Needs & Sizing
Motor Heat Rejection Based on Power Req
Mech (MW) Overall (MW) Heat Rejection (MW)
20 20.14 0.14
40 40.28 0.28
60 60.42 0.42
80 80.56 0.56
100 100.70 0.70
Motor: AC HTS
Ma
in c
oo
lant
flow Heat Pipe
Carbon Fiber Fins
Figure based on diagram from [9]
Heat Dissipation
Peak Efficiency Temp (°C) 28.00
Actual Temperature (°C) 86.60
Solar Cells: SpectroLab XTE-HF (32.1%)
Heat Sources
Radiator Length Based on Surface Temp (m)
Power Reqs (MW)
Temp (deg C) Emissivity 20 40 60 80 100
400 0.74 16.37 32.73 49.10 65.46 81.83
600 0.78 5.48 10.97 16.45 21.94 27.42
800 0.79 2.37 4.75 7.12 9.49 11.87
Radiator Diagram Full System View
Power Management
Problem:
Preliminary Sizing of the power and transmission
system
Approach:
1. Research on transmission efficiencies and power
loss
2. Preliminary sizing of the Solar Arrays
High Power system
Generation
Eclipse Time Considerations
Size and Mass Constraints
Efficiency Constraints
Transmission
Power Loss
Current and Voltage
Limitations
Heating Effects
Storage
Heating Effects
Size and Mass Constraints
Power (MW) Voltage (kV) Current (A) Examples
496.9
20704.2 24 14 AWG
Most Common in Households14614.7 34 12 AWG
9555.8 52 10 AWG
1806.9 275 3/0'Heavy Duty Wires
1325.1 375 4/0'
100 4969.0
HV Transmission (High Voltage)500 993.8
800 621.1
1,000 496.9
UHVDC1,100 451.7 China (Maximum) with 12 GW Power
1,400 354.9
[1]
[2]
Solar Array Sizing and Transmission Selection
Power Required
(MW)Solar Array Type
Solar Array
EfficiencyTransmission Efficiency
Power Produced
(MW)
Solar Array Size
(km2)Mass (Mg)
496.9
IMM-α Space
Solar Cell32%
92.08%
1686.4 1.233 604.1
MonoCrystalline
Silicon 20% 2698.2 1.973 966.5
PolyCrystalline
Silicon16% 3372.7 2.466 1208.2
HVDC vs HVAC
Advantages Disadvantages
30 – 40% more efficient
(Low Power Loss)
Costlier till 600 kmBetter Voltage
Regulation
Lower Communication
Interruption
Future Considerations:
1. Eclipse time losses
2. Battery Sizing
3. Size will decrease once batteries
included and idle charge time calculated
4. Thermal Problem
PartAltitude
(km)
Low Activity
Temperature
(K)
High Activity
Temperature
(K)
Mean
Density
(kg/m3)
Taxi
Caught356 700 1615 8x10-12
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Solar Intensity (W/m^2)
1367.9
RCS for Communication Satellites
Precise Attitude Control:
• Reaction wheels and four 3-way RCS for precise attitude control
Existing Syste𝒎[𝟏]:
[1]: W. R. Mickelsen, Future Trends in Electric Propulsion, AIAA Paper , 66-595, 1966
3-Way RCS (Dimensions and
shapes are based on the design)
Fuel Analysis for Tether Sling on Mars
42
48
54
57
91.8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
HTPB
NTO/Aerozine 50
LOX/RP-1
NTO/MMH
LOX/LH2
Mass Ratio
Chem
ical P
ropella
nts
Mass Ratio of Tether Sling to Chemical Propellants (Mars)
Code provided by Shuting Yang
Electrodynamic Boost of LEO Tether
The ED system has to boost the
momentum bank and tether sling back to
the 928 km orbit.
The entire ED length must be applied in
one direction since the force results from a
cross product.
The ED portion should not be the driving
physical dimension
The momentum bank momentum of inertia
shall equal the tether/taxi moment of inertia
Quantity Value
Taxi Mass 182 Mg
Velocity to Taxi 3.46 km/s
Tether Length 573 km
Tether Mass 19,827 Mg
ED Length 1,278 km
ED Power 461 MW
ED Boost Time 3 days
Electrodynamic Wire Configuration
Split into 2 disks to keep symmetry around
tether.
The necessary moment of inertia of the
momentum bank is much greater than the
moment of inertia of these disks.
The radius of the disk is much smaller than
the current torque arm length.
Quantity Value
Number of Disks 2
ED Disk Radius 156 m
Spacing Between Wires 3x wire radius
Effective ED Length 1,278 km
Torque Arm Sizing
Problem: Determine the length of the torque arm on the
Phobos and Luna tether slings
Assumptions:
• Maximum acceleration of 2 g’s
• Tether radius decreases linearly along length
• 10 m2 solar panels = 1 kW
• Maximum linear tip velocity = maximum ΔV
Requirement
• Generate enough torque to spin the taxi under all
conditions
HubTorque arm
Taxi
Image by Adam Brewer. Not to scale.
Torque Arm Sizing
Location Tether
Length (km)
Maximum
ΔV (km/s)
Solar Array
Area (km2)
Torque Arm
Length (km)
Phobos 700 3.7053 509 17.6
Luna 1352.9 5.1521 366 2.7
Conclusion:
• Phobos torque arm is 17.6 km
• Luna torque arm is 2.7 km
• Discrepancy mostly arises from Luna’s longer tether—results in a
lower RPM/higher torque
Cycler Vehicle- Interior Structure
The Problem:
Cycler must protect the habitants from Galactic Cosmic Radiation (GCRs), prepare
for Solar Energetic Particles (SEPs) and maintain structural integrity.
Requirements:
• Cycler must attenuate radiation exposure to 0.5 Sv/year [1]
• Cycler interior must maintain rigidity under centripetal and pressure forces
Assumptions/Constraints:
• Center wall in habitation hallway acts as structural support (multi-cell section)
Needs to Determine:
• Interior wall material and thickness
• New structural mass
Cycler Vehicle-Interior Structure Solution:
• Aluminum 7075-T6 used for hull
• High density Polyethylene foam
behind habitation hull.
Conclusions:
• GCR radiation will reduce by about
6% [3]
• Best location for SEP shelter would
be elevator stations with thickest,
densest hull [1]
• Aluminum hull can handle pressure
and structural loads with a safety of
factor of 5 [2]
Updated Cycler Structural Mass
Hull Thickness [m] 0.15
Polyethylene Thickness [m] 0.5
Mass [Mg] 7556
Cross-Sectional view of cycler habitation module