see programme document reg. no.: intra-5185124 application form · 2013-02-18 · see programme...

SEE Programme Document reg. no.: INTRA-5185124

This document has been generated automatically based on the data recorded until 11/09/2012 3:47 PM

1/138

Application Form

4th Call for Proposals

1. Project Identification

1.1. Main data

Call for proposal ID D Project acronym Silver City

Project title Innovative urban strategies and action plans to increase the social and economic role of seniors

Application ID SEE/D/0325/4.1/X EoI Reference number SEE/D/0325/4.1/X

Priority Axis Develpment of transnational synergies for sustainable growth areas

Area of Intervention Tackle crucial problems affecting metropolitan areas and regional systems of settlements

1.2.Project summary

BACKGROUND: Ageing poses a serious challenge to metropolitan areas of SEE: Increasing number of seniors coupled with low employment rate increases costs for the society (pensions, social services & health care) whichis especially problematic in light of constrained public budgets and economic downturn. Growing sustainable communities addressing the needs of seniors require good governance and leadership, realistic and attractive goals, innovative, integrative approaches, a bottom-up involvement and financial resources. OBJECTIVES: Long term goal: Silver City contributes to developing sustainable communities and growth areas characterized by strong public leadership and human capital, social inclusion and sound urban planning for the benefit of all & in particular senior citizens. Silver City supports priorities in EU Sustainable Development Strategy and EU2020 Strategy linked to balanced local development, social innovation, improved social cohesion through significant increase in senior employment resulting in improved economic performance and more solidarity between generations at local community level. Main objective: Contribute to socio-economic development of partner cities by creating better conditions for seniors to remain active in the society focusing on financial & institutional aspects, social services and quality of the urban living and working environment. Specific objectives: 1.Revisiting the competences, functions and potentials for municipalities to become main drivers of involving seniors in local socio-economic activities thus contributing to inclusive growth areas 2.Tackle the socio-economic and urban development aspects and other framework conditions 3. Change the mindset of local employers, policy makers and seniors regarding the potential role and value of seniors in contributing to sustainable communities and growth. This involves specific supply/demand matching initiatives and cooperation platforms. MAIN ACTIVITIES:



2/138

1. Establish innovative local/transnat. stakeholder platforms with municipalities, employment services, senior representation groups, training providers and local employers, strengthening local/transnational networks, leading to sustainable cooperation models/agreements. 2. Map out legislative/policy framework, strategies, financial incentives, employability and training programmes leading to identification of practices/models to be transferred/tested (City Surveys, Solution Engineering Sessions) 3. Address gaps/needs at transnational/local level and define action/models/approaches maximising synergies to and capitalisation of existing initiatives/projects (Transnational Silver City Action Plan, Local Implementation Plans, EU Policy Recommendations) 4. Test innovative approaches/tools in wide cooperation between through local pilot actions 5. Ensure long-term implementation though exchange, endorsement and follow-up actions (e.g. Local Implementation Plans, Transfer Sessions, guide on cooperation agreements) OUTPUTS: - City Surveys, transfer sessions and Synthesis Report - Local Implementation Plans with endorsement and guide for cooperation agreements - Transnational Silver City Action Plan - EU Policy Recommendations - Local pilot actions - Thematic workshops/reports - Local Quadruple Helix Forums EXPECTED RESULTS: - Highlighted importance of local/regional authorities as facilitators promoting seniors? integration in local communities and in socio-economic activities - Sustainable cooperation forums/models/agreements on senior employment and innovative community based schemes - Positive change in attitude of seniors, local employers & the society towards seniors? potential socio-economic contribution - Strengthened networks & synergies/capitalisation with other projects/initiatives - Better knowledge on the necessary senior related measures/policies for enhanced integration of seniors in metropolitan areas addressing urban planning,social & financial aspects

Project Lead Partner (official name in English)

Municipality of the Capital City of Budapest District XIV. Zugló

Lead Partner’s country

Hungary

1.3. Financial summary

Total budget 1,661,306.40 EUR

Requested ERDF contribution

1,229,951.36 EUR ERDF contribution rate 85.00 %

Requested IPA contribution

182,159.08 EUR IPA contribution rate 85.00 %

Requested ENPI contribution

0.00 EUR ENPI contribution rate 0.00 %

10% flexibility rule (amount)

3,250.00 EUR 10% flexibility rule (rate) 0.22 %

20% flexibility rule (amount)

0.00 EUR 20% flexibility rule (rate) 0.00 %



3/138

The project generates revenue No

1.4. Project duration

From month/year 10 / 2012 To month/year 9 / 2014

Duration in months 24 months



4/138

2. Partnership

2.1. Project partners (calculation: Partners + ASP – Observers)

Number of partners from EU

Austria 3

Bulgaria 2

Hungary 3

Italy 1

Romania 2

Slovenia 2

Number of partners from Non EU

Croatia 3

Total number of Project Partners 16

2.2. List of Project Partners

Partner role Official name in English Abbreviation Country

LP Municipality of the Capital City of Budapest District XIV. Zugló

Municipality of Zuglo Hungary

ERDF PP1 Province of Treviso Treviso Italy

ERDF PP2 Economic Institute Maribor, Human Resource Development Centre

EI Maribor Slovenia

ERDF PP3 Burgas Municipality BM Bulgaria

ERDF PP4 Municipality of Galati Galati Romania

ERDF PP5 City of Graz Graz Austria

IPA-I PP1 Croatian Employment Service HZZ/CES Croatia

IPA-I PP2 University of Zagreb Zagreb University Croatia

EU ASP1 Municipality of Maribor Maribor Slovenia

EU ASP2 Bourgas chamber of commerce and industry

BsCCI Bulgaria

EU ASP3 COUNTY AGENCY FOR AJOFM GALATI Romania



5/138

EMPLOYMENT GALATI

EU ASP4 ErfA ErfA Austria

EU ASP5 Nowa-training-counselling-projectmanagement

NOWA Austria

10% PP1 City of Zagreb Zagreb City Croatia

OP1 Local Government & Municipality of District 11 of Budapest, Újbuda

Ujbuda Hungary

OP2 Ministry of State for Social, Famliy and Youth Affairs

NRM Hungary

2.3. Description of the Partnership

Silver City cities are fully committed to answer the needs of their senior citizens in a way that will bring both economic and social benefits to their ageing population. Local challenges in this regard show strong similarities from region to region just as the approaches and methods by which PPs can handle them. PPs will address Silver City challenges jointly and offer their competences to work together on finding new & better solutions to be adapted later at local/regional level. COMPOSITION OF PARTNERSHIP: The partnership includes 8 PPs, 5 Associated and 1 10% Partner as well as 2 Observers from 7 SEE countries, representing 7 PP regions in a geographically balanced way and ensuring the presence of key players to put into place community building structures/mechanisms, implement innovative senior-specific education and employment programmes. The core partnership builds on local authorities with competence to implement local actions plans (Zugló, Terviso, Burgas, Galati) whereas knowledge providers to bring state of art expertise (EI Maribor, CES). In the two cases where local authorities are not among financing partners for administrative reasons, i.e. Maribor & Zagreb the relevant city administrations are associated / 10% partners who will be intensively involved in the implementation, especially developing the LIPs. As for the also relevant national level decision making, this is represented by CES Zagreb and Observer2, NRM. WHY THIS PARTNERSHIP: The Quadruple Helix constellation of the partnership (including ASPs and observers) with municipalities, employment services, universities, civil society groups at local and transnational level provide a holistic perspective on integration of seniors in our society. These cities and organisations bring the necessary competences, capacity, and financial framework to carry out this type of project in a truly transnational fashion. Several of the partners such as Maribor and Zagreb share similar structures and problems and the involvement of City of Graz also provides thematic leadership and access to more models, policy approaches etc. The Partnership has been composed to maximize cross-exchange of know-how and to strengthen the local and transnational networks on seniors and employment issues. CAPACITY to implement joint cooperation: All of the Partners have extensive previous experience in implementing EU projects of this magnitude and intensity. Detailed consultations and questionnaires during preparation revealed strengths, deficiencies and specific expertise of partners that will form the basis for the split of roles and tasks among them within Silver City allowing for an effective cooperation which fully exploits the added value of each partner. Since the majority of the Partners are public bodies and the issue tackled is a key priority at local but also national level, it is certain that the capacity will increase and partners will engage additional human



6/138

resources as well as infrastructural investments to support project implementation. REAL PARTICIPATION AND COMMITMENT (balanced division of tasks and budget): All Partners are keen on exchanging know-how with other municipalities, training institutes to optimise structures and/or renew the provided learning possibilities for seniors. Several of the partners have participated in the successfully implemented transnational projects with similar focus (Q-Ageing, CE-Ageing). Hence the majority of the partners have already built long-lasting ties and the level of commitment is high. The specific knowledge / experience of PPs on the specific aspects of the project?s objectives will be capitalised on and made available for all other PPs as a common knowledge base. Finally PPs involve a wide scale of local/regional/national stakeholders as ASPs or through Quadruple Helix Forums to rely on the much needed bottom-up process when defining integrated solutions for communities.



7/138

2.4. Project parners data

2.4.1 LP

2.4.1.1. Legal Identification Data

Official name in English Municipality of the Capital City of Budapest District XIV. Zugló

Full name in original language

Budapest Főváros XIV. Kerület Zugló Önkormányzata

Abbreviation Municipality of Zuglo Country Hungary

NUTS II Region Közép-Magyarország NUTS III Region Budapest

Type of institution Local public autority

Legal status Public

National tax number 15514004-2-42

Official address Pétervárad utca 2., Budapest, 1145 Hungary

Phone (36)-1- 8729100 Mobile

Fax 1-2521669 e-mail [email protected]

Homepage www.zuglo.hu

Legal representative

Name of the legal representative

Dr. Ferenc Papcsák

Position of legal representative

Mayor

Phone (36)-1-8729168 Mobile (36)-20-5660803


Contact Person

Name of contact person in project

Ms Melinda Balog

Position of contact person in project

Head of Department for Strategic and Project Management

Phone (36)-1- 8729100 Mobile 30-8729278


2.4.1.2. Geographic scope of the LP activities

Local

2.4.1.3. Relevance of the proposed LP in this project (thematic competence)



80/138

Description of the activity The joint Communication Strategy will be prepared by the Lead Partner at the project outset as an essential tool in ensuring a coherent communication platform across the Partnership. The C.S. provides the overarching frame for local communication actions and methodology, supports the partners in their internal (partnership level) and external communication for smooth dissemination in direction of the identified target groups. The C.S. also gives guidance on EU publicity rules and defines expected results and methodology for the assessment of the results. A project identity will be created with an identifiable logo/slogan along with further jointly defined communication tools, messages and materials. A set of publications highlighting the project?s aims, financing and final achievements will be produced along the implementation, namely a launch brochure, periodical leaflets linked to the thematic workshops and a final brochure. The project website will contribute to brand Silver City and connect it to both professional and social networks as well as partner organisations? websites expanding the audience and regional coverage. A bi-annual eNewsletters will inform key stakeholders about project progress and outputs comprising reports & interviews. Two large scale dissemination events targeting partners, ASPs, stakeholders and the general public will be organised during implementation. The Launching conference organised in month 5 will inform about the main project objectives and the first results of the City Surveys. The Final conference on the other hand, organised in month 22 will disseminate the final results of the project, i.e. the Silver City Action Plan and the outcomes of successful models tested in the pilot phase. The communication actions? efficiency & results will be monitored and evaluated and partners will implement the necessary changes. The assessment will take stock of number of website visits, number of participants to key events. For other communication platforms, notably sites with user-generated content (i.e. community sites), the impact will be estimated in function of the quantity & quality of subscriptions based on various methods of evaluation (e.g. accessibility). At PP level effectiveness will be assessed through quality/quantity of press appearances and level of enquiries or events? attendance. Methods of evaluation will target content, graphical layout, quantitative/qualitative monitoring of articles/news in the press and media. Evaluation of publications will relate to clarity of visual identity, quality of texts etc. Dissemination events will be evaluated through questionnaires on logistics, content and presentations.

Role of each partner LP? CM is taking the leading role in planning & implementing communication actions at transnational level, making sure that the CS is implemented adequately and that local communication actions are coherent to the overall framework. As part of the project?s body TAP (Transnational Advisory Forum) the LP and the WP/Theme Leaders (Zugló, Treviso, Graz, Maribor) will participate in defining the approach for the transnational communication strategy under a thematic focus.



81/138

CM will monitor partner?s activities and outcomes of dissemination activities. He/she will be in charge of the Mid-Term review of WP2 and present it to the Steering Group. CM will define key messages to support transnational communication and dissemination activities of partners. The image & logo will be suggested by the LP/CM and decided by the whole partnership. CM will also issue the eNewsletters and main project level publications such as project brochures and leaflets. eNewsletters and publications will be translated by partners into local languages and serve as local editions of the project?s visuals. Partners will be actively using and sharing information on website & web tools. The LP/CM is responsible for organisation of the launch and final conferences hosted by the LP in Budapest (Hungary) and will have an overview of the organisation of the thematic workshops organised by responsible partners. The three WP/Thematic Leaders (i.e. Maribor, Graz and Treviso) are responsible under the overall coordination of the LP/CM to ensure that thematic & transnational findings are well presented in the project information material (brochures, leaflets) for which their active participation regarding content development is requested . Some Partners and ASPs such as the Zagreb Employment Service or ERFA having a direct access to the target groups will drive the communications with this group.

Geographical location On a project level, the first geographical reach is the SEE region, where coverage of the project will be ensured and its findings will be showcased. For some Partners the geographic scope is limited to the region in which they are based, e.g. Maribor Economic Institute (Slovenia): Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III), Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III), Graz Municipality (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III), Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III), Province Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III); Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati. For others, like Zagreb Employment Services, which is a part of the Croatian Employment Service, it is a national level public body with activities covering the whole territory of the Republic of Croatia with a population of approx. 4 500 000 inhabitants. Dissemination activities also have an outreach beyond the SEE Programming area attained through networking with European initiatives and interested parties.

act 2.2

Title Media dissemination

Timeframe 01/10/2012 - 30/09/2014

Amount 79,951.20 EUR

Description of the activity Project publicity and thematic events will be supported by mass media dissemination including press releases and articles coordinated by the LP?s Communication Manager. Silver City identifies two types of media work:



82/138

1) Media coverage that supports transnational dissemination linked to arch-events introducing the project?s ambitions and final results to a wider audience and to the stakeholders (launch/final conferences, transnat. workshops). 2) Local information campaigns, informing the local communities and stakeholders on project milestones and interim project achievements (e.g. pilot actions, good practices, transfer sessions). Media communication, e.g. press & radio/TV broadcast to reach the widest audience, will be prepared at an initial phase. LP will establish media lists and coordinate the local media coverage implemented by the relevant partners. Press conferences and press interviews will be arranged in conjunction with project events, supplemented with news releases at both partners? and project level. The project will also benefit from EU media coverage especially in relation to EU Policy Recommendations and the ?briefing component? ? allowing visibility beyond the SEE region. Local media campaigns will follow a joint methodology and will be concentrated towards the end of the project to underpin the local value of the transnational work and the manner local results will be utilised at the transnational level. Local media campaigns consist of focused 3-days local ATL (Above the Line) media campaigns focusing on projects main three themes and the benefits of involvement of 50+ seniors in local communities. The communication campaigns will be assessed and discussed in the final dissemination event. A joint campaign scenario will be outlined and organized alongside ateliers/showcases, exhibitions, TV/radio spots, media interviews and studio discussions with thematic experts, web blogs & professional articles published in specialized media.

Role of each partner The LP/CM has the overall responsibility of Action 2 for which it ensures a harmonized implementation. The LP communicates project outcomes via press releases towards the European media during the project lifetime including key milestones such as project launch, development of pilot actions, outcomes of Quadruple Stakeholder Forums. Press releases will be translated and published by partners into local languages. Since A2 plans local dissemination campaigns, project partners will be actively solicited to set up their local action plans to implement campaigns based on a common media strategy. Partner municipalities release with the press & broadcasted media by inviting journalists to local events/pilot actions, covering campaign days in the press/TV/radio, and organise press conferences at thematic workshops or at the conferences to communicate on the results.

Geographical location On a project level, the first geographical reach is the SEE region, where coverage of the project will be ensured and its findings will be showcased. For some Partners the geographic scope is limited to the region in which they are based, e.g. Economic Institute of Maribor (Slovenia): ,Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III), Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III), City of Graz (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III), Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III), Province of Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III); Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati. For others, like Croatian Employment Service, which is a national level public



83/138

body with activities covering the whole territory of the Republic of Croatia with a population of approx. 4 500 000 inhabitants. Dissemination activities also have an outreach beyond the SEE Programming area attained through networking with European initiatives and interested parties.

act 2.3

Title Knowledge transfer and cross-fertilisation -

Timeframe 01/10/2012 - 30/09/2014


Description of the activity Silver City's Communication Strategy reflects the project aims and ensures continuous dissemination of findings towards external target towards local levels aiming for local/regional uptake groups as well as internal communication between the partners. The Communication Strategy will be complemented by a Knowledge Sharing Strategy (KSS) prepared jointly by the LP and Maribor EI to maximise knowledge transfer and to support local networks in a bottom-up approach. Knowledge sharing will therefore significantly involve external local and transnational experts through designated coordinating groups to build up high-quality know-how throughout the project. KSS will define the methodology and the activities aiming at exchanging Silver City?s knowledge within the partnership and beyond including defining the involvement of observers, networks (Age Platform Europe, Age Resource Center) and links with other relevant European projects. The KSS will be the motor of the expected change the project seeks regarding the mindset of local employers, policy makers and seniors on the potential role and value of the latter in contributing to sustainable communities and growth. According to the methodology set out by the KSS, knowledge partners will act as ?the ambassadors? of the project, representing the project through networking and participation in project-related European events for cross fertilisation. Other partners in the meantime will participate in national or regional thematic events to advocate the project findings. Professional articles will also be published linked to project benchmarks in thematic or professional magazines, newspapers, blogs. They will also be shared on the project?s website and social networks to maximise stakeholders' involvement & information. A final EU Briefing will be held in Budapest where local/national decision makers together with EU-level policy makers (MEPs, EU Commission representatives) and key European networks, transnational organisations and interest groups are invited for a briefing on the main project outputs and the endorsement needed at EU level.

Role of each partner Knowledge partners (Maribor, Zagreb University and CES) will be jointly in charge of the overall coordination of Action 3. They together with relevant knowledge ASP such as ERFA, NOWA, will be responsible for producing high quality publications/articles in professional magazines & on forums. As part of the project's body TAP (Transnational Advisory Forum), the LP and the



84/138

WP/Theme Leaders (Treviso, Graz, Maribor) will all actively participate in knowledge sharing process via local/European publications and networking. Partners will all be liaising with local and transnational networks (ARC, Age Platform) and knowledge partners (i.e. Economic Institute Maribor, Zagreb University and Employment Service) will also attend EU level events, forums with the aim of cross-fertilisation and sharing/disseminating Silver City results. Participating partners will report their attendance of project events (reports, briefings) actively and share their experiences within European networks within the whole partnership. The LP will be responsible for organising the Thematic Briefing, organised as an extension of the fourth Thematic Workshop in Budapest.

Geographical location On a project level, the first geographical reach is the SEE region, where coverage of the project will be ensured and its findings will be showcased. For some Partners the geographic scope is limited to the region in which they are based, e.g. Economic Institute of Maribor (Slovenia): ,Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III), Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III), City of Graz (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III), Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III), Province of Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III); Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati. For others, like Croatian Employment Service, which is a national level public body with activities covering the whole territory of the Republic of Croatia with a population of approx. 4 500 000 inhabitants. Dissemination activities also have an outreach beyond the SEE Programming area attained through networking with European initiatives and interested parties.

4.2.4. Additional information

Will the activities related to project's transnational communication and dissemmination be sub-contracted?

Yes

4.2.5. Qualitative and quantitative description of the outputs and results

Type Description Partner Contributing

Partner Measure-ment unit

Base value

Target value

Period of delivery

output

Project identity: visuals (image, logo) + information material (brochure, leaflets) Web based image (website + social

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All piece

0.00

52.00 period05



85/138

networks)

output Communication & dissemination strategy

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All document

0.00

1.00 period01

output

Mid-Term Communication assessment report

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All document

0.00

1.00 period03

output eNewsletters (4) - incl. local translations

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All publication

0.00

32.00 period05

output Dissemination events: LC, FC

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

Zugló and Graz

conference

0.00

2.00 period05

output

Press events (press conference + release) & media appearance

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All PPs appearanc

e

0.00

20.00 period05

output

Local information days/regional campaigns incl. Local press events & media diss. activities

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All PPs event

0.00

7.00 period05

output

Participation in other related EU events & networking

ERDF PP2 - EI Maribor

UniZagreb and other

PPs

participation

0.00

20.00

period04

output

Knowledge Sharing Strategy & disseminate Thematic Briefing Event documents

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

MariborEI document

0.00

2.00 period04

output

Thematic/professional publications on EU platforms & networks


UniZagreb publication

0.00

3.00 period04

result

permanent information sources / channels in project (websites,

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All other

0.00

4.00 period05



86/138

regular publications)

result

individuals reached directly through dissemination outputs in the cooperation area

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

individuals

0.00

49,805.0

0 period05

result

administrative / public actors reached directly through dissemination outputs in the cooperation area

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All public actors

0.00

175.00

period05

result

private sector actors reached directly through dissemination outputs in the cooperation area

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All Private actors

0.00

175.00

period05

result

advanced tools and methodologies adopted to increase the projects visibility among experts, the wider communities and the public

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All tool

0.00

3.00 period05

result

advanced tools and methodologies adopted to improved knowledge management within the partnership


All tool

0.00

1.00 period05

result regions proactively promoted

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

Regions

0.00

10.00 period05

4.3. wp3 – Content



87/138

4.3.1.Work Package Main Data

Title Institutional and Financial Framework Conditions

Responsible Partner ERDF PP2 - EI Maribor

WP Total including ENPI partners

261,468.80 EUR WP Total ERDF partners 229,622.40 EUR

WP Total IPA-I partners 31,846.40 EUR

4.3.2. Description

WP3 focuses on the first project theme: Regulatory, institutional and financial framework (e.g. legislation, strategies, financial mechanisms, institutional and urban aspects), which also contributes to addressing the first sub-objective: Revisiting the competences, functions and potentials for municipalities as main drivers of promoting and ensuring involvement of seniors in local socio-economic activities contributing to inclusive growth areas. WP3 is lead by the Economic Institute of Maribor who also implement Activity 1(City Surveys) in close cooperation with the Activity Leaders (LP for Activity 1 &2 on City Surveys / Sessions, Burgas for Activity 3 on Local Implementation Plans). WP3 is divided into 3 connected activities involving transnational expertise and leading to highly relevant local outputs. 1.City Surveys to map out good and bad practices of partners and provide a detailed description of policy/legal/financial/spatial barriers and limitations to tackle the problem. This City Survey is also supplemented by a Synthesis Report comparing findings and both outputs will be discussed wide by stakeholder forum(see WP5). 2.Two type of transfer sessions to enhance the exchange of knowledge and implementation of innovative practices and models: - 1 Solution Engineering Session linked to City Surveys in every PP location proposing solutions to challenges and opportunities and practices/models to be tested - 1 Transfer Visit closely linked to the Local Implementation Plans for integration and implementation of knowledge, good practices and tested models. 3. Local Implementation Plans (LIPs) with full bottom-up and cross-sectoral engagement. The LIPs incorporate findings of City Surveys, the transfer sessions and results of the pilot actions. LIPs define follow-up actions,extend the cooperation platforms, set milestones and provide recommendations for necessary measures to ensure framework conditions supporting increased active ageing and social inclusion

4.3.3. Activities of ERDF & IPA-I partners

act 3.1

Title City Surveys

Timeframe 01/10/2012 - 28/02/2013


Description of the activity Next after defining the Survey methodology, launching coordination mechanisms and the establishment of the Quadruple Helix Forums to be continuously consulted throughout the project, the next phase starts with the 7 City Surveys that will be carried out at local by Partners? internal and external experts under coordination of WP/Thematic Leaders. The City Surveys will focus on the three project themes: institutional and financial frameworks, innovative models and approaches and cooperation frameworks. They aim at mapping out the existing institutional, financial and policy/legislative framework as well as the framework conditions facilitating or rendering more difficult a greater socio-economic uptake of seniors in metropolitan areas and it will also identify existing good and bad practices.



88/138

A stepped methodology and process to the City Survey include: 1) PPs, together with their internal or external experts and ASPs with the leadership of LP and the WP/Theme Leaders, define already in month 2 of the project (Transnational Working Group meeting 0) the precise methodology for the City Surveys and indicators and criteria to ensure easy comparability for later compilation in the Synthesis Report. This step will result in template form for the City Surveys at least comprising of chapters on: - identification and description of the target group (seniors 50+ and 60+) - policy/legislative framework also describing the general economic, social, urban planning and accessibility frameworks - senior focused strategies facilitating active ageing (including employment) and social inclusion - the institutional structures and financial incentives - training and educational opportunities for seniors - demand/supply situation regarding local employment also addressing the interest and prevailing attitudes among seniors and local employers - existing cooperation frameworks 2) PPs start implementing the City Surveys from month 2-3. The City Survey will be lead by an external or internal expert delegated by the Partner, also allowing for involvement of ASPs. The City Surveys will be based on both desk study, interviews / survey of target group, employment agencies, training centers, municipalities, local business etc. The local experts will screen existing employment policies/strategies/models, legislative framework, incentive schemes, infrastructural context to identify obstacles, opportunities and possibly good practices on enabling and attractive, senior-specific employment conditions. The experts will be in continuous contact with the PM from the relevant Partner to allow monitoring of progress. The experts should also have access to advise from LP and the WP/Theme Leaders on methodological issues etc. 3) First information and consultation of the preliminary findings of the City Surveys take place in the Quadruple Helix Forums in month 3 with key stakeholders including the target groups. 4) City Survey reports will be finalised (in local language with English version). The drafting is mainly carried out by the local experts but with quality review of the LP and WP/Theme Leaders. The report should be ready by month 5 of the project. 5) The City Survey process, relevant findings and reports will be disseminated and discussed in the Quadruple Helix Forums in month 6. This second consultation aims at wide dissemination and validating the findings. The City Surveys will in the next phase be analysed, compared and summarised in the Synthesis Report (WP4) to pave the way for the Transnational Silver City Action Plan (WP4) ? later to be reflected and adapted to the local conditions in the Local Implementation Plans. In addition, the good practices identified and transferred through the Synthesis Report, Solution Engineering Sessions and the Transnational Silver City Action Plan will also be reflected and tested in the local pilot actions.



89/138

Role of each partner Action 1 on City Surveys is lead by the Economic Institute of Maribor who has ample experience in analysing policy and institutional contexts, especially from a financial point of view. Maribor will utilise its qualities as knowledge provider but also as a strategic partner in the local governance context in Slovenia in guiding the Partners in carrying out the City Surveys. The overall responsibility for the City Survey activity will be assured by the Project Manager and the local internal expert(s) designated. EI Maribor will develop the City Survey methodology and report template jointly with the LP, Zugló. This will also be discussed in general by all PPs, ASPs in the initial Thematic Coordinating Meeting carried out in month 1 of the project. These are in short the role of the partners: 1) All PPs carry out the City Surveys where their PMs and local external/internal experts take central role in the desk research and interviews, with a highlighted role of ASP1 and ASP6 (Municipality of Maribor and City of Zagreb, as the subjects of the survey) 2) All PPs, ASPs and local internal or external experts have the possibility to follow and react to the findings of the City Surveys in the Quadruple Helix Forums in month 3 and 6. 3) PP?s local experts take the lead in drafting the City Survey Reports 4) LP and WP/Theme Leaders (i.e. Economic Institute of Maribor, City of Graz and Province of Treviso) together with University of Zagreb representing academic qualities review the reports and suggest changes to ensure high quality, objectivity, consistency and adherence to template.

Geographical location The City Surveys will apply to the whole partnership region, which includes the core territorial areas covered by the mandate and activities of the Partner Organisations but also to a large extent a much larger territorial space since the City Surveys will map out national and regional policies/strategies etc. Hence the geographic scope where the City Surveys will take place will be more confined then the covered geographic scope of these studies. The geographic scope as defined by the Partners is: ? Economic Institute of Maribor (Slovenia): Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III). ? Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III) ? City of Graz (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III) ? Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III) ? Province of Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III) ? Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati ? Croatian Employment Service and University of Zagreb: City of Zagreb

act 3.2

Title Engineering and Transfer Sessions

Timeframe 01/03/2013 - 31/03/2014




90/138

Description of the activity Two type of transfer sessions are planned to enhance the exchange of knowledge and implementation of innovative practices and models. First Partners organize 1 Solution Engineering Session around month 6 in direct relation to the City Surveys. The Solution Engineering Sessions (like targeted study visits) take place in every City following the City Surveys and the Quadruple Helix Forums to search for concrete actions and solutions tackling the identified challenges and opportunities. These aim at providing proposals for solutions and specific follow-up actions addressing the challenges and opportunities identified. Second, the Partners organise 1 Transfer Visit in connection to the launch of the Local Implementation Plans. These aim at ensuring that the knowledge that was acquired in the project is reflected in the LIPs and that good practices and models are implemented. The sessions will be of length of max 2 days and involve bilateral and multilateral meetings, field visits to organisations or bodies where the good practices or models can be absorbed. The main steps of these sessions are described below: A) Solution Engineering Sessions 1) Initial planning and putting together the Solution Engineering Session methodology, scope and objective during the first Thematic Coordination Meeting in month 1 2) Deciding on the methodology, and composition of Solution Engineering Session teams: one transnational TAP expert, PPs? local expert, one WP/Theme Leader, local ASPs and possibly additional interested partners with similar challenges during the internal kick-off meeting in month 2. 3) The designated team will implement the Solution Engineering Sessions between months 6-8 involving meetings, field visits and expert consultations with a view to maximise transfer of good practices and models also to be implemented in the local pilot actions. 4) The designated TAPs draft short reports of the Solution Engineering Sessions defining to what extent the good practices, models and approaches could and will be taken up at local level and recommendations for further steps. 5) EI Maribor drafts a summarising report on all 7 sessions feeding the Transnational Silver City Action Plan B) Transfer Sessions 1) Initial planning and putting together the Transfer Session teams composed of one transnational TAP expert, PPs? local expert, one WP/Theme Leader and local ASPs. This will be decided around month 9 of the project, based on the results of the Solution Engineering Session and the targeted needs at local level for further transfer of good practices, models etc. 2) Decide on methodology, scope and objective decided in the third Transnational Thematic Workshop (month 9) 3) The designated team will implement the Transfer Sessions between months 18-20 involving meetings, field visits and expert consultations with a view to maximise transfer of good practices and models also implemented / tested in the local pilot actions. 4) Drafting of final report on the Transfer Sessions, integrating the results from pilot actions, with recommendations for further steps to finalize objectives and activities set out by the Local Implementation Plans.



91/138

5) EI Maribor drafts a summarising report on all 7 sessions feeding the Transnational Silver City Action Plan

Role of each partner EI Maribor is overall leader of these two types of sessions. EI Maribor will thus take an overall coordinating role to ensure compliance with the agreed methodology, approach and objectives. Strong support will be provided from WP Leaders that will participate in all of the sessions in all the Partner organisations and will provide advice for possible modifications and follow-up measures. TAP experts coordinated by WP Leaders will draft reports following the sessions, while EI Maribor will also draft the summarising reports upon finalising the Solution Engineering Sessions and Transfer Sessions. WP/Theme Leaders, together with the local PP and its designated local experts and 1 TAP transnational expert will carry out the two types of sessions. Whereas, WP/Theme Leaders have a more coordinating role to ensure sufficient focus on the project three themes and to carry out overall quality control, each PP is responsible for the actual implementation of the sessions in its city/region. This PP will together with its designated internal or external local expert make all the necessary arrangements in terms of organising meetings, field visits. The role of the TAP expert is mainly to assist in the actual sessions to transfer transnational best practices, models, to emphasise the thematic focus and ensure through the reports drafted following the sessions that the results of the sessions are being channelled back to the transnational level and being reflected in the main transnational outputs such as the Transnational Silver City Action Plan and the EU Policy Recommendations.

Geographical location The Solution Engineering Sessions and Transfer Session will be carried out in the following locations: ? Economic Institute of Maribor (Slovenia): Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III). ? Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III) ? City of Graz (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III) ? Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III) ? Province of Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III) ? Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati ? Croatian Employment Service and University of Zagreb: City of Zagreb However, the impact of these sessions will extend beyond these defined territories since the good practices, models and other recommendations will be taken up in other regions and possibly also at national level.

act 3.3

Title Local Implementation Plans

Timeframe 01/02/2013 - 30/09/2014


Description of the activity The City Surveys and Transfer Sessions along with key outputs from WP4 and WP5 (Transnational Silver City Action Plan and Local Pilot Actions) will lead into



92/138

the Local Implementation Plans which constitute the main framework for actions and milestones after project expiry. The LIPs will: 1) set out measures to be taken to ensure a strong coordinating and supervising role of municipalities in integrating seniors at local level, which addresses financial, capacity and resource issues, 2) address urban spatial elements, accessibility and social conditions facilitating seniors involvement in the labour market also contributing to sustainable development (e.g. use of underused buildings, convenient public transport services), 3) develop niche markets for seniors, e.g. (public) social and care services and set out specific measures to engage seniors in these fields 4) provide tools and frameworks for enabling senior employment, 5) put into place tools and frameworks for enabling employment, which includes cooperation agreements between municipalities and local employers The main steps of the LIPs include: 1) Initial planning of LIPs, their objectives, methodology and content already from month 2 in relation to the kick-off Transnational Working Group Meeting. 2) Initial discussions at transnational level about the LIPs, their function and on how to ensure that transnational best practices, approaches and EU policy objectives are properly reflected in them 3) Activity Leader Burgas Municipality together with PPs and their local experts decide on methodology and content and develop the LIP template in month 6 4) Partners consult the Quadruple Helix Forums on LIPs template also making links to the Transnational Silver City Action Plan and the results of the local pilot actions. This dialogue will ensure full bottom up and cross sectoral engagement so that the views of the key target group and the stakeholders can be reflected in the LIPs. 5) Drafting of the LIPs will start around month 18 where transnational inputs will be gained through the Transfer Sessions (Activity 2). The finalisation of these plans is expected by month 22. 6) Start the implementation of the LIPs according to the set timeline with milestones and methodology for monitoring and evaluation 7) Partners, and ASPs where relevant, will start the endorsement process including concluding cooperation agreements (WP5/3) still in the project lifetime

Role of each partner Burgas Municipality leads this action assisted by its local internal and external experts with the overall coordination and supervision of WP3 Leader, Burgas Municipality will commence the initial planning of LIPs, their objective, methodology and content in month 5 together with the WP/Theme Leaders and PPs, ASPs participating in the Transnational Thematic Workshop. Burgas Municipality will finalise the LIP template around month 6 together with the input of local experts and the views of PPs. All PPs, their local external or internal experts will be actively be involved in defining the template for the Local Implementation Plans and will draft their own LIPs based on the joint methodology and template. In case of Maribor and



93/138

Zagreb, the respective Municipalities will be intensively involved in the drafting process to facilitate later endorsement. The ASPs and the stakeholders will provide their views, inputs to the draft LIP (from months 18-21) Burgas Municipality will have a final quality review of LIPs together with the other WP Leaders All PPs and the relevant ASPs (Zagreb and Maribor Municipality) will plan and put into place the endorsement process supporting the LIPs, which includes entering into cooperation agreements on job creation, social inclusion schemes, incentive programmes etc. All PPs will monitor the endorsement / implementation process and report back to Burgas in month 24 to be included in the Final Report submitted by the LP.

Geographical location The Implementation Plans will extend beyond the direct territorial scope of the partner regions as defined below: ? Economic Institute of Maribor (Slovenia): Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III). ? Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III) ? City of Graz (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III) ? Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III) ? Province of Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III) ? Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati ? Croatian Employment Service and University of Zagreb: City of Zagreb Since the LIPs will contain measures applicable on a larger regional area even in certain cases at national level, the geographic scope will be at least double this size.





Base value

Target value

Period of delivery

output 1 Joint methodology for City Surveys

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

WP leaders other

0.00

1.00 period01

output City Surveys Reports


All document

0.00

7.00 period01

output Solution Engineering

ERDF PP2 - EI

All visit

0.00

7.00 period02



94/138

Sessions at PP locations

Maribor

output

Solution Engineering reports by TAP experts


WP leaders document

0.00

7.00 period02

output Transfer Session at PP locations


All meeting

0.00

7.00 period04

output Transfer Session reports by TAP experts


WP leaders document

0.00

7.00 period04

output Summaries on Session reports


WP leaders document

0.00

2.00 period04

output

Local Implementation Plan Template/methodology (based on transn action plan)

ERDF PP3 - BM

WP leaders document

0.00

1.00 period01

output Local Implementation Plans


All document

0.00

7.00 period05

output Report on endorsement process of LIPs

ERDF PP3 - BM

All document

0.00

7.00 period05

result common methodologies adopted


All methodolo

gy

0.00

2.00 period05

result

strategies adopted at governmental level


All strategy

0.00

3.00 period05

result

regional / local policies and instruments improved or developed

ERDF PP3 - BM

All policy

0.00

7.00 period05

result

permanent exchange programmes established


All other

0.00

2.00 period05

result advanced tools & methodologies

ERDF PP2 - EI

All tool

0.00

1.00 period05



95/138

adopted to improved knowledge management within the partnership

Maribor

result

individuals benefitting directly from new / improved services

ERDF PP3 - BM

All individuals

0.00

14,000.0

0 period05

result investment proposals developed

ERDF PP3 - BM

proposal

0.00

2.00 period05



Title Innovative Incentive Tools and Models for Engaging Seniors in Local Communities

Responsible Partner ERDF PP5 - Graz




4.4.2. Description

WP4 focuses on project THEME 2 - Innovative incentive tools to engage and invest in 50+ seniors in local communities with strong links to SUB-OBJECTIVE 2 : Tackle socio-economic and urban development aspects and other framework conditions (paid or voluntary involvement). WP4 identifies and tests innovative incentive tools at transnational and local level: 1) SYNTHESIS REPORT Based on City Surveys and the Solution Engineering Session LP with TAP Experts & WP/Thematic Leaders prepares a comparative Synthesis Report, collating identified best practices and models and suggestions for concrete actions / solutions to the identified challenges & opportunities. Synthesis Report along with TWG activities sets the stage for SCAP and the LIPs. 2) TRANSNATIONAL SILVER CITY ACTION PLAN (SCAP) Based on Action 1 outcomes and conclusions of local stakeholder consultations (Quadruple Helix) Treviso (with TAP experts & WP/Theme Leaders) drafts the SCAP setting out objectives, actions, milestones focusing on the 3 project themes. It will both ensure transnational synergies and consider EU priorities and initiatives on active ageing, social inclusion and urban development as well as local conditions & priorities in PP regions. Drafting starts early (m6) and will be finalised by m22 after final quality review and consultation with relevant stakeholders, incl. EU institutions. SCAP leads to JOINT POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS on issues that need to be dealt with at EU level to facilitate local action on involving seniors in the economy. 3) LOCAL PILOT ACTIONS Partners start implementing local pilot actions based on key recommendations of SCAP and joint pilot methodology, in 2 main fields: 1) 50+ seniors in paid or semi-paid employment by local employers, 2) 60+ seniors in innovative voluntary cooperation frameworks. Pilots are discussed in Quadruple Helix Forums and evaluated. TAP will bring the transn. dimension in pilots and their evaluation and make sure that SCAP is revised if need be.



96/138


act 4.1

Title Synthesis Report

Timeframe 01/01/2013 - 31/03/2013


Description of the activity The LP will lead the action on Synthesis Report. This report aims at providing the bridge between WP3 on institutional and financial framework and WP4 focusing on innovative incentive models. The Synthesis Report analyzes the local mapping processes (i.e. the City Surveys) to compare and condense the findings with a view to provide an overview of common problems but also opportunities, best practices and innovative models that can be exploited and transferred across the region. The Synthesis Report is drafted in month 6 mainly by the LP with the input of all PPs. The WP / Thematic Leaders and the international experts in TAP will carry out a quality review. These are the main steps of the Synthesis Report: 1) LP together with WP/Theme Leaders decide on the methodology and template for the synthesis report in connection with Thematic Working Group meeting 2 (month 5). The methodology will be strongly building on the City Survey methodology where the LP also takes a major role. 2) LP collects and analyses all the materials from the initial mapping exercise (City Surveys and the reports of the first Quadruple Helix Forum meetings) assisted by the WP/Theme Leaders (this is carried out between months 4-5) 3) LP together with WP/Theme Leaders start draft the Synthesis Report in month 5 to be finalised by month 6. 4) Final quality review is done by the WP/Thematic Leaders and partly TAP experts with the view to ensure sufficient uptake of thematic expertise and consistency with EU policies. 5) Finalisation of the Synthesis Report is due in month 6 6) The dissemination of the Synthesis Report findings will take place at local level in the Quadruple Helix Forums (month 6) and on transnational level during the Transnational Thematic Workshop in month 9. It will be on the basis of the Synthesis Report that the team of experts will carry out the Solution Engineering Sessions in the partner locations (WP3/Action 2) which aim at providing targeted recommendations, models and practices which address some of the key points of the City Survey. The Synthesis Report along with the Transnational Thematic Working Group activities will set the stage for the Transnational Silver City Action Plan and the Local Implementation Plans. The Transnational Silver City Action Plan will be drafted by WP/Thematic Leaders in close cooperation with all other Partners, ASPs and the TAP experts. The Action Plan will reflect the EU priorities on the topic and capitalise on relevant policies/action/initiatives but also be such as to be able to correspond to the local conditions and priorities in the Partner regions.

Role of each partner The LP will: - lead the action on Synthesis Report, assisted by the Ujbuda Municipality ? both municipalities having ample experience with strategies focusing on senior



97/138

integration in local communities. - liaise with the WP/Theme Leaders for thematic precision - consult the TAP experts for final quality review. All PPs will: - provide the final City Surveys and report of the first Quadruple Helix Forum meeting to the LP along with other supplementary materials or reflections relevant to the Synthesis Report - review and provide comments to the draft Synthesis Report - help disseminate the Synthesis Report, e.g. through the second Quadruple Helix Forum meeting in month 6 and in local press, making it available on websites WP/Theme Leaders: - assist in developing a report template where the themes are well connected and key messages are highlighted - review the draft Synthesis Report - help disseminate the Synthesis Report on transnational level (e.g. in the Transnat. Thematic Workshops) - integrate the findings of the Synthesis Report (together with the Solution Engineering Sessions? outputs) into the main transnational outputs such as the Silver City Action Plan and EU Policy Recommendations. TAP Experts: - will provide a final quality review of the Synthesis Report and will channel the findings back to partners through the Solution Engineering Sessions to follow

Geographical location The Synthesis Report will mainly relate to the direct territorial scope of the partner regions as defined below: ? Economic Institute of Maribor (Slovenia): Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III). ? Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III) ? City of Graz (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III) ? Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III) ? Province of Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III) ? Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati ? Croatian Employment Service and University of Zagreb: City of Zagreb

act 4.2

Title Silver City Action Plan

Timeframe 01/02/2013 - 31/08/2014


Description of the activity The Province of Treviso will take the lead in developing a Transnational Silver City Action Plan (SCAP). This Action Plan will build on the initial survey and thematic expertise ensured by stakeholders, local and international experts in employability, social inclusion and urban development issues. It will again focus on the main 3 themes, considered crucial for successful engagement of seniors in socio-economic activities. The template for the local implementation plans will be developed as part of the SCAP and will serve to translate some of the



98/138

goals and elements of the Action Plan into actions at local level. The Development of the SCAP will start relatively early in the project ? right after the finalization of the Synthesis Report in month 6 ? and will undergo a final revision at the end of the project taking up key points and learnings of the pilot actions and the several stakeholder consultations in the Transnational Thematic Workshops and during the Quadruple Helix Forum meetings. The Action Plan will also link with the Transnational Policy Recommendations regarding issues that need to be dealt with at EU level to facilitate local action on involving seniors in the economy. These recommendations should focus on ancillary issues such as integrated urban planning, social inclusion, equality aspects and accessibility. The main steps in the process of developing the Silver City Action Plan comprise: 1) The Province of Treviso develops the template for the SCAP. This template is discussed first with WP Leaders at first Thematic Coordination Meeting (month 1) and with all partners during the first Transnational Thematic Workshop (TWG and TAP Seminar) in month 2 where transnational experts in TAP, stakeholders and WP/Theme leaders are expected to provide valuable input. 2) The first draft of the Silver City Action Plan is developed comprising also a portfolio of innovative models to boost investment in seniors identified during the city surveys and benchmarking ? expected for month 10 3) The template for LIPs is adjusted and pilot plans refined based on Silver City Action Plan methodology and structure 4) Consultations of the draft action plan at local and transnational level take place, i.e. in the Quadruple Stakeholder Forum meetings (month 6) and in the Transnational Thematic Workshop No 3 in month 15 with particular focus on best practices, models already in the testing phase that can be taken up at local level 5) The first outline of EU Policy Recommendations expected by around month 15 6) Quality review by the WP Leaders and TAP experts of the draft SCAP and EU Policy Recommendations will be done by month 19 7) Commence work in integrating the results of the pilot actions into the SCAP especially focusing on best practices and models that can be included in the LIPs. 8) Finalising the action plan in month 21 and provide further inputs for the LIPs through the Transfer Sessions ((WP3/2) 9) Dissemination of final Silver City Action Plan and EU Policy Recommendations at transnational and local level, i.e. at the EU Briefing and the Final Conference held in Budapest

Role of each partner Transnational Silver City Action Plan will be drafted by the Province of Treviso with the input of the WP/Thematic Leaders in close cooperation with all other Partners, ASPs and with the overall thematic mainstreaming and quality review of the International TAP experts. Treviso will: - draft the methodology and template for the Silver City Action Plan and its integrated portfolio of models with the input of the PPs, which should also be in synchrony with the template for the LIPs



99/138

- overall coordinate the work on the Transnational Silver City Action Plan and ensure continuous liaising with WP/Theme Leaders, LP and the TAP as well as with all PPs to ensure uptake of views and knowledge acquired at local level - ensure that the transnational knowledge gathered through the drafting of the action plan is implemented in the pilot actions and vice versa, the results of the pilots are fed back into the final SCAP - consult the TAP experts for final quality review Municipality of Galati: - lead the work on drafting the EU Policy recommendations All PPs and ASPs will: - be involved in deciding on the methodology and content of the Silver City Action Plan - review and provide comments to the draft Silver City Action Plan and its portfolio of models - review and provide comments to the EU Policy Recommendations - make sure that the Silver City Action Plan is properly reflected in the local pilot actions and in the LIPs - help disseminate and highlight the importance of the Silver City Action Plan at local/regional level through the Quadruple Helix Forum and through media/press.

Geographical location The Silver City Action Plan and the EU Policy Recommendations will have a larger geographic scope going far beyond the geographic areas of the Partner organisations. Due to the outreach of the Communication Strategy and the dissemination events it is expected that the geographic scope will extend to other regions of the EU and in particular Brussels (Belgium) as a central place for transnational networks and organisations focusing on active ageing and social inclusion. Given that the Silver City Action Plan can also comprise elements relevant for national action its impact will extend beyond the following limited geographic scope: ? Economic Institute of Maribor (Slovenia): Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III). ? Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III) ? City of Graz (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III) ? Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III) ? Province of Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III) ? Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati ? Croatian Employment Service and University of Zagreb: City of Zagreb

act 4.3

Title Pilot Actions

Timeframe 01/12/2012 - 31/05/2014


Description of the activity City of Graz leads this component of pilot actions, which will test the models and best practices identified in the City Surveys, Transnational Thematic Workshops and Transnational Silver City Action Plan thorough local actions involving senior citizens and local partners, i.e. local employers, employment



100/138

services, training institutes, local decision-makers and. The pilot actions will be implemented following joint methodology to ensure comparability of the outcomes. They will be centered around two schemes (A) active ageing with paid/semi-paid employment or B) the social inclusion schemes focusing on voluntary contribution). Pilots will not have a major focus on longer spells of training/requalification since they will mainly apply to relatively jobs requiring limited training (community, health and care services). The main aim behind the pilot actions is both to test the models, approaches and best practices identified in earlier phases of the project but also to build the first foundation for more long-term cooperation frameworks and innovative incentive schemes to realise an increase in seniors? socio-economic involvement. These are the main steps of the pilot actions: 1) Graz will develop the joint methodology of the pilot actions together with the WP/Theme Leaders (i.e. LP, Economic Institute of Maribor and Province of Treviso) 2) Graz will together with WP/Theme Leaders and all the PPs decide on the content, timeline, monitoring mechanisms for the pilot actions 3) Every PP will decide on which of the two focuses they take as well as on the parties they cooperate with 4) All PPs have to ensure introductory awareness raising and information sessions involving the addressed key stakeholders at local level 5) All PPs set up the pilot action platform including the relevant, necessary ICT structures, the monitoring mechanisms and reporting structures 6) PPs implement pilot actions from month 8-9 until month 20. Each City is required to choose one of these two: A) Paid or semi-paid engagement at local employers, especially community based soft services such as in public bodies or in NGOs. This pilot action focus on those between 50 and 60 who have are relatively easily requalified and due to the age group and softer type of social services, it is expected the proportionally more women will be targeted. B) Volunteerism projects aiming at social inclusion and improved solidarity for sustainable communities. The type of pilots foreseen includes those where there is an exchange of unpaid services between seniors. This pilot action focus on seniors 60+ who have little incentives to step back to the labour market but who still are physically and mentally active and what to life an active life with social network and sense of value and community belonging. All pilots will be implemented following joint process composed of 4 steps: 1) engagement of target group, 2) cooperation with business and service providers which involve developing the necessary legal and infrastructural structures, cooperation framework, support structures, incentive schemes also taking into account supplementary framework conditions such as supporting structures, social services and urban development aspects, 3) demonstration phase where different forms of employment / entrepreneurship / voluntary services established through local cooperations are tested . This phase will comprise financial arrangements 4) evaluation phase with key learnings 5) Mid-term review of the pilot actions around month 14 where the results are being discussed among partners, ASPs and stakeholder promoting mutual



101/138

learning and giving chance for adaptations 6) Evaluation of pilot actions with the view to determine the results and overall learnings to be reflected in the final project outputs, i.e. the LIPs and the Transnational Silver City Action Plan and the EU Policy Recommendations. 7) Wide dissemination of the results in the Final Conference

Role of each partner The City of Graz will lead the action on pilot actions. The tasks of Graz include:Coordinate the work and quality overview of the local pilot actions, provide advice to the PPs and provide specific target input to the LP - Develop the joint methodology of the pilot actions together with the WP/Theme Leaders (i.e. LP, Economic Institute of Maribor and Province of Treviso) - Together with the WP/Theme Leaders and all the PPs decide on the content, timeline, monitoring mechanisms for the pilot actions - Make a mid-term evaluation of the pilot actions based on provided input of the PPs (e.g. reports, reactions to the pilot actions in Quadruple Helix Forum meetings) - Together with the WP/Theme Leaders and PPs carry out the final evaluation of pilot actions with the view to determine the results and overall learnings to be reflected in the final project outputs, i.e. the LIPs and the Transnational Silver City Action Plan and the EU Policy Recommendations. All PPs in consultation with the ASPs and the local internal/external experts will: - Decide on whether to implement the pilot stream focusing on active ageing with paid/semi-paid employment or the social inclusion schemes focusing on voluntary contribution as well as to decide on the parties - Ensure introductory awareness raising and information sessions involving the addressed key stakeholders at local level - Set up the pilot action platform including the relevant, necessary ICT structures, the monitoring mechanisms and reporting structures - Mid-term review of the pilot actions around month 14 where the results are being discussed among partners, ASPs and stakeholder giving chance for adaptations - Provide input (e.g. reports, results) to Graz and LP to form the basis for the final evaluation. - Ensure that the results and outputs of the pilot actions are reflected in the LIPs and the endorsement actions to ensure sustainability and transferability beyond the limited geographic area - Ensure wide dissem

Geographical location Economic Institute of Maribor (Slovenia): Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III). Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III) City of Graz (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III) Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III) Province of Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III) Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati



102/138

Croatian Employment Service and University of Zagreb: City of Zagreb





Base value

Target value

Period of delivery

output

Synthesis report - comparative analysis of City surveys

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All document

0.00

1.00 period01

output Methodology for Silver City Action Plan (SCAP)

ERDF PP1 -

Treviso WP Leaders document

0.00

1.00

period01

output

Draft Transnational Silver City Action Plan

ERDF PP1 -

Treviso WP leaders document

0.00

1.00

period03

output

Final Transnational Silver City Action Plan

ERDF PP1 -

Treviso WP leaders document

0.00

1.00

period05

output EU Policy Recommendations

ERDF PP4 - Galati

All document

0.00

1.00 period05

output Joint pilot methodology

ERDF PP5 - Graz

WP Leader document

0.00

1.00 period01

output Partner level pilot plans

ERDF PP5 - Graz

All document

0.00

7.00 period01

output Implementation of pilots (A and B options)

ERDF PP5 - Graz

All other

0.00

7.00 period04

output Evaluation reports on pilots actions

ERDF PP5 - Graz

All report

0.00

7.00 period04

result common methodologies adopted

ERDF PP5 - Graz

All Methodolo

gy

0.00

2.00 period05

result innovative products / services

ERDF PP5 - Graz

All services

0.00

4.00 period05



103/138

developed

result new tools / instruments developed (SCAP)

ERDF PP1 -

Treviso All tool

0.00

1.00

period05

result pilot actions prepared (first application)

ERDF PP5 - Graz

All action

0.00

7.00 period05

result pilot actions implemented (first application)

ERDF PP5 - Graz

All action

0.00

7.00 period05



Title Innovative Cooperation Frameworks

Responsible Partner ERDF PP1 - Treviso




4.5.2. Description

WP5 is the last content related work package centered around the 3rd PROJECT THEME: ?Cooperation framework with institutionalised quadruple stakeholder involvement also involving local employers. This theme strongly relates to the THIRD PROJECT SUB-OBJECTIVE : 'Change the mindset of local employers, policy makers and seniors regarding the potential role and value of seniors in contributing to sustainable communities and growth, which will involve cooperation platforms to create job opportunities for seniors' WP5 complements WP3 & WP4 with a strong thematic and stakeholder involvement component. Given the strong thematic and bottom-up approach of Silver City with wide consultation, validation and knowledge transfer WP5 will start in the first months of implementation. WP5 consists of 3 main activities: 1/a) Thematic Coordination Meetings to ensure smooth implementation: prepare thematic workshops, define joint methodologies, schedule of implementation and discuss quality review of outputs, responsibilities 1/b) Transnational Thematic Workshops: TAP Seminars and field visits for intensive knowledge transfer, TWG Meetings to agree on joint methodologies, outputs and implementation. 2) Establish a Transnational Advisory Panel (TAP) aiming at ensuring high quality and thematic input from internal/external transnat. experts. The TAP composed of international external / internal experts takes a significant role in the quality review. It carries out: 1) thematic seminar component in the Transnat. Thematic Workshops, 2) Solution Engineering / Transfer Sessions and 3) external quality review of core documents. 3) Set up Quadruple Helix Forums with governance bodies, local business, universities, employment services and senior citizens. These local forums will tackle 3 thematic issues in an integrated way, in bi-annual meetings. The Forums will be coordinated by thematic experts of PPs - who are also part of the Transnat. TWG, ensuring links between local & transnat. l



104/138


act 5.1

Title Thematic Workshops and Coordination

Timeframe 01/10/2012 - 30/09/2014


Description of the activity As a horizontal stream (WP5), there will be high concentration of thematic expertise, coordination and quality review. The thematic expertise stream is guaranteed through Thematic Working Group and their thematic coordination meetings as well as Transnational Thematic Workshops in which both internal and external experts, interest groups will be participating to gather and convey expertise including models and approaches from transnational to national level. The thematic coordination will be carried out throughout the project by the Thematic/WP Leaders and the Thematic Working Group as the main vehicle. In addition, a Transnational Advisory Panel with international external experts and internal project experts will be established with a dual function to provide thematic coordination and to provide a continuous quality overview. 1. Thematic/WP Leaders will hold 4 THEMATIC COORDINATION MEETINGS (in Budapest and in Maribor and in virtual form for the other two meetings), where also key Activity Leaders might be invited with the task of preparing all thematic workshops, discuss the joint methodologies, discuss quality review of PP outputs by theme leaders, timing / responsibilities, etc 2. The THEMATIC WORKING GROUPS are composed of LP, Thematic/WP Leaders (i.e. Economic Institute of Maribor, City of Graz and Province of Treviso) and the thematic experts designated by each Partner. They meet at the kick-off to launch thematic activities (City Survey, Solution Engineering Sessions) and then 4 times during Transnational Workshops with the aim to jointly agree on the methodologies, schedule and division of tasks proposed by activity leaders and enhance knowledge exchange between partner experts. 3. 4 TRANSNATIONAL THEMATIC WORKSHOPS will be carried out four times during the project duration. These workshops will be composed of 3 parts with the participation of Partner-level Thematic Experts, relevant ASPs and observers and TAP experts: A) Transnational Thematic Working Group meetings (1/2 day); B) TAP Seminar: held by the international external TAP experts especially focusing on innovative approaches and good practices linked to 3 themes (1/2 day), C) Field visits lead by hosting PP (1/2 day). The field visits can either focus on innovative services, approaches and should in particular allow for direct contacts with seniors and the various stakeholders in the employment sector. 4. A final EU BRIEFING targeting the EU institutions, civil society organisations and transnational networks will be organised together with the last Thematic Workshop in Budapest. The aim of this EU Briefing is to find an efficient forum and method to summarise the project outputs for those organisations or governance bodies (such as representatives from EU institutions) which have not been actively involved throughout the project. This Briefing is lead by the LP and held in Budapest. Expected results after this briefing is constructive



105/138

dialogue at transnational level defining possible follow-up actions at the level of EU institutions to take up the project outputs/results in policies and initiatives with particular attention to the next programming period. The main outputs of action 1 are: - Quality review of WP3-WP5 outputs - 4 Thematic Coordination Meetings - 4 Transnational Thematic Workshops including 4 Thematic Working Group meetings / 4 TAP Seminars and / 4 Field visits and the related reports - Thematic EU briefing in connection with last Transnational Thematic Workshop

Role of each partner A central role in action 1 is taken by LP, Economic Institute of Maribor, City of Graz and Province of Treviso as WP/Theme Leaders coordinating the thematic working groups. They will, together with key activity Leaders participate in the Thematic Coordinating Meetings to discuss methodologies, milestones, actions and discuss content and quality related issues. In the Thematic Working Group all the Partners, the ASPs and the local internal or external experts of all PPs will discuss the thematic priority issues and plan the Transnational Thematic workshops together. The Transnational Thematic Workshops composed of three main parts, i.e. Transnational Thematic Working Group meetings, the Transnational Advisory Panel Seminar and the Field Visit will be organised by the hosting partners (m5: Budapest, m9 Burgas,m15: Galati and m20: Budapest) supported by the WP/Theme Leaders / TAP expert for the content. The Transnational Thematic Workshops? reports and written preparatory or concluding material should be mainly drafted by the knowledge partners (e.g. University of Zagreb, Economic Institute of Maribor, Croatian Employment Service), consulting the rest of the partnership and PP experts. Field visits will be organised by the hosting parties in close cooperation with the relevant ASPs and local experts. The final EU briefing in month 20 of the project will be held in Budapest and lead by the LP assisted by the local thematic experts and possibly also a TAP member.

Geographical location The thematic coordinating activities will cover the whole partnership area in terms of effects. The Coordinating meetings will be carried out in Budapest and Maribor or virtually. The Transnational Thematic Workshops will take place in Budapest, Burgas and Galati. These cities will also host the field visit component of the workshops. However, participation by international experts of TAP and representatives of transnational organisations will ensure a larger geographic coverage since the knowledge acquired will be shared and disseminated over a larger geographic area. The thematic knowledge will be reflected and discussed in the 7 Quadruple Helix Forums with the following geographic scope: ? Economic Institute of Maribor (Slovenia): Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III). ? Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and



106/138

Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III) ? City of Graz (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III) ? Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III) ? Province of Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III) ? Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati ? Croatian Employment Service and University of Zagreb: Zagreb The final EU briefing in month 20 of the project will be held in Budapest but will have a greater geographic coverage since the objective of the briefing is to widen the dissemination of the outputs.

act 5.2

Title TAP and Quality Review

Timeframe 01/11/2012 - 31/07/2014


Description of the activity This activity aims at ensuring high quality and thematic input from internal and external transnational and local experts. This activity consists of two main elements: 1) Overall continuous quality review for which mainly the LP and the WP/Theme Leaders are responsible. The Thematic Coordinating Meetings will in particular be a suitable forum for discussions on output methodology, quality targets etc. Activity Leaders have to consult the WP/Theme Leaders on outputs they are responsible for to ensure relevance, comparative approach and high uptake of thematic expertise gathered in the project. 2) The setting up of a Transnational Advisory Panel to provide an additional transnational and thematic dimension to project activities and outputs. In addition, the TAP is performing a very important role as external quality controller. In the first Thematic Coordination Meeting in month 1, LP, WP/Theme Leaders in consultation with all PPs and ASPs will propose precise constellations and experts for the TAP. The TAP will be set up in month two of the project and be composed of 1-2 international internal or external experts per theme. The TAP experts are nominated by the WP/Theme Leaders, e.g. City of Graz, Province of Treviso and the Economic Institute of Maribor. They will both deploy internal international experts available within the partnership e.g. from the University of Zagreb as well as reputable EU/international experts which may come from either academia, international organisations, transnational networks or even industry associations where relevant. The TAP expertise should be balanced between the 3 themes of the project; 1) institutional and financial frameworks, 2) innovative models and approaches, 3) integrative cooperation frameworks. TAP?s main functions comprise: 1) participate and provide thematic seminars in 4 thematic workshops: TAP will first of all provide some advice to the Thematic Working Group, especially in terms of methodology, thematic priorities selected for the Transnational Thematic Workshops. Secondly, they will organise the second component of the Transnational Thematic Workshops consisting of the TAP Seminar where



107/138

TAP experts aim at bringing in good practices, innovative models and innovative approaches to active ageing and social inclusion promoted by EU policies, transnational networks etc. 2) be involved in the 7 Solution Engineering Sessions and Transfer Sessions: one of the TAP members together with the WP/Thematic Leaders will carry out these sessions. Regarding, the Solution Engineering Sessions (month 6-8) an expert team composed of 1 TAP member, the relevant PP and local experts will meet for a two day meeting to discuss the findings of the City Survey and to agree on solutions and further measures that will be tested in pilots and later reflected in the Local Implementation Plans. Regarding the Transfer Session at the end of the project, TAP experts mainly ensure that the transnational models, best practices and thematic expertise have sufficiently been transferred and taken up at local level. 3) carry out external quality review of core project outputs: TAP experts will provide an external quality review of the Synthesis Report, Transnational Action Plan and EU Policy Recommendations together with WP/Theme Leaders to ensure high thematic relevance, coherence with EU objectives, capitalisation of current initiatives, projects, knowledge. The TAP will largely be consulted towards the finalisation of the outputs to ensure appropriate thematic approach and the possible uptake of essential information from EU or transnational projects/initiatives/strategies. This quality review is very valuable not only to ensure high overall quality and consistency but also to ensure topical relevance, accuracy and relevance for the target audience. Outputs: - TAP - 4 Seminars - Quality review reports on WP3-WP5 outputs

Role of each partner A central role in Action 2 on TAP and quality review is taken by Province of Treviso as Activity Leader. LP and the WP/Theme Leaders (i.e. Economic Institute of Maribor, City of Graz and Province of Treviso) will carry out the quality review of the main activities and outputs with the respective WP/Theme Leaders ultimately responsible for the quality in their particular WPs. The Activity Leaders (i.e. EI Maribor, Graz, Treviso, LP, Burgas) will also be partly involved in the quality review as these will be participating Thematic Coordinating Meetings where quality issues will be discussed. LP, WP/Theme Leaders (EI Maribor, Graz and Treviso) will coordinate the activities of the TAP and be responsible for smooth communication and quality input towards the PPs. University of Zagreb will delegate 1-2 experts for the TAP All Partners will be consulted and will host a Solution Engineering and a Transfer Session Knowledge providers, i.e. CES, Zagreb Uni, EI Maribor along with relevant ASPs



108/138

such as ErfA or NOWA will be able to propose internal/external international experts, 2) will be consulted on quality aspects throughout the project (especially in the Transnational Thematic Working Groups, Thematic Coordinating Meetings.

Geographical location The Thematic Workshops and the integrated TAP seminars will be carried out in Budapest, Galati and Burgas but for the benefit of the whole Partnership region and beyond since transnational stakeholders / networks also will be invited. The Coordinating meetings will be carried out in Budapest and Maribor. The second component of WP3 / Action 2 on Solutions Engineering Sessions and the Transfer Sessions will be carried out in all the Partner regions meaning: ? Economic Institute of Maribor (Slovenia): Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III). ? Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III) ? City of Graz (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III) ? Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III) ? Province of Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III) ? Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati ? Croatian Employment Service and University of Zagreb: Zagreb In regard to the third component on quality review, activities will not be confined to a specific region as the quality review is mainly focusing on core project outputs. The quality review will have positive impact on the outputs to be disseminated in the Partner region and beyond.

act 5.3

Title Quadruple Helix Forums

Timeframe 01/12/2012 - 30/04/2014


Description of the activity This action is central to the whole project and although it is presented as action 3 of WP5, it will be one of the first activities of the project. The Quadruple Helix Forums unite all the main stakeholders, meaning municipalities, relevant public bodies (e.g. employment services, bodies providing services for senior citizens), business, universities, civil society groups as well as organisations, networks representing the direct target group - senior citizens. These local forums will meet in bi-annual meetings tackling the 3 themes in a holistic, integrated manner. These forums will be coordinated by thematic experts of partner organisations - who are also part of the Thematic Working Group, thus ensuring links between local and transnational level. The local ASPs and observers will also take active part of the forums. These local forums will build up knowledge on good practices in employment models, favourable policy and institutional structures. This cooperation is expected to maximize the sharing of experiences, solutions between Partner regions especially focusing on 1) developing long-term cooperation platforms promoting job opportunities and re-adaptation schemes, 2) creating / providing (financial) incentive schemes for social inclusion. The main steps of setting up and operating the Quadruple Helix Forums:



109/138

1) Initial Thematic Coordinating Meeting and Kick-off meeting discussing the methodology of these forums, their composition, their focus, components and time-table. 2) WP/Theme Leader as general forum coordinators together with LP, PPs and ASPs set up the 7 forums in the partner regions in month 3 of the project. These coordinators will ensure a steady transfer of thematic knowledge and expertise from transnational level to local and that the dialogue and results of the forums are channelled up to the transnational level to validate the EU Policy Recommendations, the Transnational Silver City Action Plan etc. 3) Carrying out forum meetings twice a year (4 in total, commencing in month 6 of the project). These forum meetings will be organised in close connection with the main project outputs with the view to ensure timely consultation and validation. For instance, the first meeting will be carried out closely after the City Surveys, Synthesis Report and Solution Engineering Sessions. The second meeting is close in time to drafting of the Transnational Silver City Action Plan and the local pilot actions. 4) Final phase of the forums with discussions on how to ensure long-term sustainability of the forums. The local stakeholders will contribute to defining actions to contribute to realising the project objectives while also matching their needs. Some of the results in this stage of the forum include integrating achievements in the forums into the LIPs, such as endorsement action, cooperation agreements, new senior services planned. A guide is finally drafted by the University of Zagreb based on the partner reports (conclusion papers) summarizing conclusions and learnings gathered during the stakeholder engagement and cooperation building by partners. This Guide will be part of the Silver City Action Plan.

Role of each partner The overall coordination of WP5, Action 3, is ensured by the LP. LP proposes the initial methodology, concept of the forums which will be discussed and decided jointly on together with the WP/Theme Leaders (i.e. City of Graz, Province of Treviso and Economic Institute of Maribor) and the local experts. The WP/Theme Leaders mainly ensure a consistent approach of the forums across the partnerships and the cross-fertilisation of knowledge/outputs/capacities between WP3-WP5. All the Partners will nominate at least one local expert to take part in the forums. Their tasks include assisting in preparing for the forum meetings and drafting the meeting reports. Since these experts also participate in the Transnational Thematic Workshops and in the TAP Seminars, they will guarantee a steady transfer of thematic knowledge from the transnational level ensuring feedback into transnational level and outputs such as EU Policy Recommendations. University of Zagreb will elaborate the cooperation agreements to be included as a Chapter of the Silver City Action Plan.



110/138

Geographical location The Quadruple Helix Forums will be carried out in all the partner regions ? Economic Institute of Maribor (Slovenia): Vzhodna Slovenia (Nuts II) and Podravska region (Nuts III). ? Burgas Municipality (Bulgaria): Yugoiztochen region, BG 34 (Nuts II) and Oblast Burgas, BG 341 (Nuts III) ? City of Graz (Austria); Styria, AT22 (Nuts II) and Graz, AT221 (Nuts III) ? Zuglo Municipality (Hungary): Central Hungary (Nuts II) and Budapest (Nuts III) ? Province of Treviso (Italy): Province of Treviso (Nuts III) ? Municipality of Galati (Romania): Galati ? Croatian Employment Service and University of Zagreb: Zagreb Due to the wide character of the forums and the anticipated involvement of regional organisations / networks etc. its geographic scope will be larger than the area of the Partner organisations.





Base value

Target value

Period of delivery

output Thematic coordination by WP Leaders

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

WP leaders other

0.00

1.00 period05

output 4 Thematic Coordnation meetings )

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

WP Leaders meeting

0.00

4.00 period04

output

Transnational Thematic Workshop: a) TWG meeting; b) TAP Seminar; c) field visit

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All meeting

0.00

4.00 period04

output EU Briefing

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All meeting

0.00

1.00 period04

output Transnational Advisory Panel

ERDF PP1 -

Treviso

LP, Graz, Maribor

other

0.00

1.00 period01

output Quality review reports (WP3,4,5 outputs)

ERDF PP1 -

Treviso

LP, Graz, Maribor

other

0.00

3.00 period05



111/138

output Local Quadruple Helix Forum

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All forum

0.00

7.00 period01

output

Local Quadruple Helix Forums meetings (incl. Reflection and conclusion papers)

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All meeting

0.00

28.00 period04

output Cooperation agreements w/ stakeholders

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All other

0.00

7.00 period03

output

Guide on cooperation agreements focusing on senior employability

IPA-I PP2 - Zagreb Universit

y

All guide

0.00

1.00 period04

result

common positions / agreements formulated

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All agreement

0.00

7.00 period05

result

common standards established through new guidelines

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All guideline

0.00

1.00 period05

result

permanent exchange programmes established

ERDF PP1 -

Treviso All other

0.00

2.00

period05

result

staff members with increased capacity (awareness / knowledge / skills)

LP - Municipa

lity of Zuglo

All other

0.00

20.00 period05

result

advanced tools and methodologies adopted to improved knowledge management within the partnership

ERDF PP1 -

Treviso All other

0.00

1.00

period05



112/138


This document has been generated automatically based on the data recorded until 11/09/2012 3:47 PM 113/138

5. Project Budget

5.1. Source of co-financing per partners

Partner role and abbreviation

ERDF Contribution

IPA

Contribution

ENPI Contribution

State Contribution

Other Public Contribution

Own Public

Contribution

Total PP Budget

EUR % EUR % EUR % EUR % EUR % EUR % EUR

LP - Municipality of Zuglo 369,575.58 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,456.98 9.99 0.00 0.00 21,762.24 5.01 434,794.80

ERDF PP1 - Treviso 217,713.90 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,420.10 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 256,134.00

ERDF PP2 - EI Maribor 174,005.03 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,706.77 15.00 0.00 0.00 204,711.80

ERDF PP3 - BM 116,040.30 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,477.70 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136,518.00

ERDF PP4 - Galati 119,341.02 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,223.76 12.98 0.00 0.00 2,836.42 2.02 140,401.20

ERDF PP5 - Graz 233,275.53 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,166.27 15.00 274,441.80

IPA-I PP1 - HZZ/CES 0.00 0.00 98,684.49 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,414.90 15.00 116,099.40

IPA-I PP2 - Zagreb University

0.00 0.00 83,474.59 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,730.81 15.00 98,205.40

Total 1,229,951.36 74.04 182,159.08 10.96 0.00 0.00 120,578.55 7.26 30,706.77 0.00 97,910.64 5.89 1,661,306.40

5.2. Total project budget per Project Partners and Work Packages

Partner role and abbreviation

WP0 WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 TOTAL

LP - Municipality of Zuglo 25,820.00 159,008.80 71,970.40 51,873.20 62,676.80 63,445.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 434,794.80 30.05

ERDF PP1 - Treviso 0.00 30,300.00 41,720.00 36,300.00 82,864.00 64,950.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 256,134.00 17.70

ERDF PP2 - EI Maribor 680.00 16,191.40 35,107.60 48,418.40 48,666.40 55,648.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 204,711.80 14.15

ERDF PP3 - BM 400.00 13,914.00 22,430.00 19,857.60 46,883.20 33,033.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 136,518.00 9.43

ERDF PP4 - Galati 320.00 11,363.60 21,934.00 15,448.00 52,857.60 38,478.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,401.20 9.70

ERDF PP5 - Graz 1,320.00 26,768.60 44,778.00 57,725.20 67,404.80 76,445.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 274,441.80 18.97

WP Totals of ERDF partners 28,540.00 257,546.40 237,940.00 229,622.40 361,352.80 332,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,447,001.60 100.00



IPA-I PP1 - HZZ/CES 520.00 14,994.60 18,053.20 15,591.20 39,696.40 27,244.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 116,099.40 54.17

IPA-I PP2 - Zagreb University 520.00 14,994.60 22,276.80 16,255.20 16,283.60 27,875.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 98,205.40 45.83

WP Totals of IPA partners 1,040.00 29,989.20 40,330.00 31,846.40 55,980.00 55,119.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 214,304.80 100.00

WP Totals of ENPI partners 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

TOTAL 29,580.00 287,535.60 278,270.00 261,468.80 417,332.80 387,119.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,661,306.40

1.78 17.31 16.75 15.74 25.12 23.30 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.3. Total budget overview per budget lines and per WP

5.3.a Total budget overview for ERDF and IPA-I partners per budget lines and WP


1. Staff 5,580.00 114,470.00 97,310.00 112,360.00 112,060.00 168,190.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 609,970.00 36.72

2. Overheads 0.00 7,365.60 6,500.00 7,508.80 6,508.80 10,479.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,362.40 2.31

3. Travel and accommodation costs

0.00 26,500.00 20,410.00 20,800.00 23,000.00 73,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 163,710.00 9.85

4. External expertise and services

24,000.00 126,200.00 151,000.00 120,800.00 273,264.00 135,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 830,714.00 50.00

5. Equipment 0.00 3,600.00 3,050.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,150.00 0.55

6. Small scale investment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

7. Financial charges and guarantee costs

0.00 9,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,400.00 0.57

TOTAL 29,580.00 287,535.60 278,270.00 261,468.80 417,332.80 387,119.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,661,306.40

1.78 17.31 16.75 15.74 25.12 23.30 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.3.b Total budget overview for ERDF partners per budget lines and WP




1. Staff 4,540.00 99,480.00 78,810.00 92,780.00 93,560.00 135,950.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 505,120.00 34.91

2. Overheads 0.00 6,166.40 5,020.00 5,942.40 5,028.80 7,900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,057.60 2.08


0.00 19,100.00 14,560.00 15,600.00 17,000.00 58,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 124,860.00 8.63


24,000.00 122,200.00 136,500.00 115,300.00 243,264.00 129,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 770,814.00 53.27

5. Equipment 0.00 3,600.00 3,050.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,150.00 0.63


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


0.00 7,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.48

TOTAL 28,540.00 257,546.40 237,940.00 229,622.40 361,352.80 332,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,447,001.60

1.97 17.80 16.44 15.87 24.97 22.94 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.3.c Total budget overview for IPA-I partners per budget lines and WP


1. Staff 1,040.00 14,990.00 18,500.00 19,580.00 18,500.00 32,240.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 104,850.00 48.93

2. Overheads 0.00 1,199.20 1,480.00 1,566.40 1,480.00 2,579.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,304.80 3.88


0.00 7,400.00 5,850.00 5,200.00 6,000.00 14,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,850.00 18.13


0.00 4,000.00 14,500.00 5,500.00 30,000.00 5,900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59,900.00 27.95

5. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00




0.00 2,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,400.00 1.12

TOTAL 1,040.00 29,989.20 40,330.00 31,846.40 55,980.00 55,119.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 214,304.80

0.49 13.99 18.82 14.86 26.12 25.72 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.4. Total spending forecast PER WP and period

5.4.a Total spending forecast for ERDF partners per WP and period


period01 28,540.00 58,629.40 46,793.54 8,104.64 23,511.12 51,739.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 217,318.18 15.02 %

period02 0.00 30,525.06 35,910.76 132,079.40 55,920.00 80,747.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 335,183.12 23.16 %

period03 0.00 60,258.96 59,842.82 16,828.14 180,713.08 71,729.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 389,372.02 26.91 %

period04 0.00 76,304.00 46,573.40 60,515.18 96,874.08 103,323.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 383,589.68 26.51 %

period05 0.00 31,828.98 48,819.48 12,095.04 4,334.52 24,460.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 121,538.60 8.40 %

TOTAL 28,540.00 257,546.40 237,940.00 229,622.40 361,352.80 332,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,447,001.60

1.97 17.80 16.44 15.87 24.97 22.94 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.4.b Total spending forecast for IPA-I partners per WP and period


period01 1,040.00 5,985.28 4,858.16 492.48 2,748.60 7,768.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,892.92 10.68 %

period02 0.00 3,764.76 5,599.26 17,094.12 8,233.92 15,095.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,787.82 23.23 %

period03 0.00 6,878.08 11,941.56 2,526.30 28,572.48 11,317.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 61,235.78 28.57 %

period04 0.00 9,257.68 9,628.62 9,823.34 15,919.56 18,530.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 63,160.08 29.47 %

period05 0.00 4,103.40 8,302.40 1,910.16 505.44 2,406.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,228.20 8.04 %

TOTAL 1,040.00 29,989.20 40,330.00 31,846.40 55,980.00 55,119.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 214,304.80



0.49 13.99 18.82 14.86 26.12 25.72 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.5. ERDF and IPA-I partners’ budgets per budget lines and per WP

LP - Municipality of Zuglo


1. Staff 1,820.00 39,360.00 22,380.00 9,790.00 8,960.00 17,820.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,130.00 23.03 %

2. Overheads 0.00 3,148.80 1,790.40 783.20 716.80 1,425.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,864.80 1.81 %


0.00 1,300.00 1,950.00 1,300.00 2,000.00 7,900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,450.00 3.32 %


24,000.00 111,000.00 42,800.00 40,000.00 48,500.00 36,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 302,600.00 69.60 %

5. Equipment 0.00 2,000.00 3,050.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,550.00 1.74 %


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %


0.00 2,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,200.00 0.51 %

TOTAL 25,820.00 159,008.80 71,970.40 51,873.20 62,676.80 63,445.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 434,794.80

5.94 36.57 16.55 11.93 14.42 14.59 0.00 0.00 0.00

ERDF PP1 - Treviso WP0 WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 TOTAL

1. Staff 0.00 22,400.00 16,060.00 11,400.00 22,700.00 37,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 109,760.00 42.85 %

2. Overheads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %


0.00 3,900.00 4,160.00 3,900.00 3,000.00 8,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,460.00 9.16 %


0.00 4,000.00 21,500.00 21,000.00 57,164.00 19,250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122,914.00 47.99 %

5. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %

6. Small scale 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %



investment


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %

TOTAL 0.00 30,300.00 41,720.00 36,300.00 82,864.00 64,950.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 256,134.00

0.00 11.83 16.29 14.17 32.35 25.36 0.00 0.00 0.00



1. Staff 680.00 10,455.00 15,470.00 37,980.00 38,580.00 30,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 133,765.00 65.34 %

2. Overheads 0.00 836.40 1,237.60 3,038.40 3,086.40 2,448.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,646.80 5.20 %


0.00 3,700.00 3,900.00 3,900.00 3,000.00 11,100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,600.00 12.51 %


0.00 0.00 14,500.00 3,500.00 4,000.00 11,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,500.00 16.36 %

5. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %


0.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.59 %

TOTAL 680.00 16,191.40 35,107.60 48,418.40 48,666.40 55,648.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 204,711.80

0.33 7.91 17.15 23.65 23.77 27.18 0.00 0.00 0.00

ERDF PP3 - BM WP0 WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 TOTAL

1. Staff 400.00 5,800.00 6,000.00 6,720.00 3,040.00 8,040.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,000.00 21.98 %

2. Overheads 0.00 464.00 480.00 537.60 243.20 643.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,368.00 1.73 %


0.00 3,250.00 1,950.00 1,300.00 3,000.00 8,850.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,350.00 13.44 %


0.00 3,200.00 14,000.00 11,300.00 40,600.00 15,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 84,600.00 61.97 %

5. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %




0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %


0.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.88 %

TOTAL 400.00 13,914.00 22,430.00 19,857.60 46,883.20 33,033.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 136,518.00

0.29 10.19 16.43 14.55 34.34 24.20 0.00 0.00 0.00

ERDF PP4 - Galati WP0 WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 TOTAL

1. Staff 320.00 4,920.00 4,800.00 12,700.00 9,720.00 11,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,060.00 31.38 %

2. Overheads 0.00 393.60 384.00 448.00 137.60 928.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,291.20 1.63 %


0.00 3,250.00 1,950.00 1,300.00 3,000.00 10,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,950.00 14.21 %


0.00 0.00 14,800.00 1,000.00 40,000.00 15,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71,300.00 50.78 %

5. Equipment 0.00 1,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,600.00 1.14 %


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %


0.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.85 %

TOTAL 320.00 11,363.60 21,934.00 15,448.00 52,857.60 38,478.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,401.20

0.23 8.09 15.62 11.00 37.65 27.41 0.00 0.00 0.00

ERDF PP5 - Graz WP0 WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 TOTAL

1. Staff 1,320.00 16,545.00 14,100.00 14,190.00 10,560.00 30,690.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 87,405.00 31.85 %

2. Overheads 0.00 1,323.60 1,128.00 1,135.20 844.80 2,455.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,886.80 2.51 %


0.00 3,700.00 650.00 3,900.00 3,000.00 11,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,050.00 8.40 %


0.00 4,000.00 28,900.00 38,500.00 53,000.00 31,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 155,900.00 56.81 %

5. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %




0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %


0.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.44 %

TOTAL 1,320.00 26,768.60 44,778.00 57,725.20 67,404.80 76,445.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 274,441.80

0.48 9.75 16.32 21.03 24.56 27.85 0.00 0.00 0.00

IPA-I PP1 - HZZ/CES WP0 WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 TOTAL

1. Staff 520.00 7,495.00 7,040.00 8,140.00 10,830.00 14,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,325.00 41.62 %

2. Overheads 0.00 599.60 563.20 651.20 866.40 1,144.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,824.40 3.29 %


0.00 3,700.00 3,900.00 1,300.00 3,000.00 7,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,100.00 16.45 %


0.00 2,000.00 6,550.00 5,500.00 25,000.00 4,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,650.00 37.60 %

5. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %


0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %


0.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 1.03 %

TOTAL 520.00 14,994.60 18,053.20 15,591.20 39,696.40 27,244.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 116,099.40

0.45 12.92 15.55 13.43 34.19 23.47 0.00 0.00 0.00



1. Staff 520.00 7,495.00 11,460.00 11,440.00 7,670.00 17,940.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56,525.00 57.56 %

2. Overheads 0.00 599.60 916.80 915.20 613.60 1,435.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,480.40 4.56 %


0.00 3,700.00 1,950.00 3,900.00 3,000.00 7,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,750.00 20.11 %


0.00 2,000.00 7,950.00 0.00 5,000.00 1,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,250.00 16.55 %

5. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %




0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %


0.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 1.22 %

TOTAL 520.00 14,994.60 22,276.80 16,255.20 16,283.60 27,875.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 98,205.40

0.53 15.27 22.68 16.55 16.58 28.38 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.6. ERDF and IPA-I Partners’ spending forecast per WP and per period



period01 25,820.00 36,114.32 23,859.28 2,819.72 8,821.28 7,650.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 105,084.76 24.17 %

period02 0.00 18,838.62 13,458.40 32,513.88 10,217.48 11,189.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 86,217.78 19.83 %

period03 0.00 38,086.70 14,444.86 4,156.60 29,135.44 10,859.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 96,682.64 22.24 %

period04 0.00 47,143.10 11,222.02 9,793.96 14,249.88 29,129.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 111,538.20 25.65 %

period05 0.00 18,826.06 8,985.84 2,589.04 252.72 4,617.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,271.42 8.11 %

TOTAL 25,820.00 159,008.80 71,970.40 51,873.20 62,676.80 63,445.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 434,794.80

5.94 36.57 16.55 11.93 14.42 14.59 0.00 0.00 0.00

ERDF PP1 - Treviso WP0 WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 TOTAL

period01 0.00 7,320.00 6,415.50 380.00 2,845.00 11,160.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,120.50 10.98 %

period02 0.00 3,217.50 6,083.00 21,950.00 14,304.60 15,480.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61,035.10 23.83 %

period03 0.00 7,172.50 12,223.00 1,680.00 41,273.40 14,170.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76,518.90 29.87 %

period04 0.00 8,887.50 9,653.50 10,970.00 22,446.00 19,530.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 71,487.00 27.91 %

period05 0.00 3,702.50 7,345.00 1,320.00 1,995.00 4,610.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,972.50 7.41 %

TOTAL 0.00 30,300.00 41,720.00 36,300.00 82,864.00 64,950.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 256,134.00

0.00 11.83 16.29 14.17 32.35 25.36 0.00 0.00 0.00





period01 680.00 3,355.52 5,372.18 3,090.96 1,955.88 8,687.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,142.46 11.30 %

period02 0.00 1,924.86 4,986.52 23,953.68 7,256.76 14,989.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 53,111.38 25.94 %

period03 0.00 3,777.44 10,317.46 4,335.24 24,948.96 11,912.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 55,291.34 27.01 %

period04 0.00 4,897.40 8,455.96 13,978.04 14,064.16 16,139.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 57,534.72 28.11 %

period05 0.00 2,236.18 5,975.48 3,060.48 440.64 3,919.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,631.90 7.64 %

TOTAL 680.00 16,191.40 35,107.60 48,418.40 48,666.40 55,648.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 204,711.80

0.33 7.91 17.15 23.65 23.77 27.18 0.00 0.00 0.00

ERDF PP3 - BM WP0 WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 TOTAL

period01 400.00 2,873.40 3,158.80 939.60 1,309.92 5,303.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,985.08 10.24 %

period02 0.00 1,951.50 3,284.40 14,627.20 6,666.48 11,040.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,569.78 27.52 %

period03 0.00 2,526.60 6,654.00 1,020.60 24,751.20 6,825.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,777.84 30.60 %

period04 0.00 4,604.00 4,873.20 2,492.60 13,721.20 7,156.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,847.84 24.06 %

period05 0.00 1,958.50 4,459.60 777.60 434.40 2,707.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,337.46 7.57 %

TOTAL 400.00 13,914.00 22,430.00 19,857.60 46,883.20 33,033.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 136,518.00

0.29 10.19 16.43 14.55 34.34 24.20 0.00 0.00 0.00

ERDF PP4 - Galati WP0 WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 TOTAL

period01 320.00 4,258.48 3,106.04 197.20 1,751.20 6,219.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,852.12 11.29 %

period02 0.00 1,064.64 3,270.52 8,242.80 7,635.76 9,835.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,049.52 21.40 %

period03 0.00 2,280.56 6,452.20 1,512.00 28,251.84 11,185.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,682.20 35.39 %

period04 0.00 2,157.60 4,727.56 4,146.00 14,648.56 8,478.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,157.92 24.33 %

period05 0.00 1,602.32 4,377.68 1,350.00 570.24 2,759.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,659.44 7.59 %

TOTAL 320.00 11,363.60 21,934.00 15,448.00 52,857.60 38,478.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140,401.20

0.23 8.09 15.62 11.00 37.65 27.41 0.00 0.00 0.00

ERDF PP5 - Graz WP0 WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 TOTAL

period01 1,320.00 4,707.68 4,881.74 677.16 6,827.84 12,718.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,133.26 11.34 %

period02 0.00 3,527.94 4,827.92 30,791.84 9,838.92 18,212.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 67,199.56 24.49 %



period03 0.00 6,415.16 9,751.30 4,123.70 32,352.24 16,776.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 69,419.10 25.29 %

period04 0.00 8,614.40 7,641.16 19,134.58 17,744.28 22,889.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 76,024.00 27.70 %

period05 0.00 3,503.42 17,675.88 2,997.92 641.52 5,847.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,665.88 11.17 %

TOTAL 1,320.00 26,768.60 44,778.00 57,725.20 67,404.80 76,445.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 274,441.80

0.48 9.75 16.32 21.03 24.56 27.85 0.00 0.00 0.00

IPA-I PP1 - HZZ/CES WP0 WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 TOTAL

period01 520.00 2,992.64 2,008.10 225.72 1,428.84 4,293.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,468.82 9.88 %

period02 0.00 1,882.38 2,463.24 7,969.68 5,840.52 8,013.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,169.26 22.54 %

period03 0.00 3,439.04 5,300.58 2,034.90 21,161.04 6,143.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,079.48 32.80 %

period04 0.00 4,628.84 4,326.24 3,984.26 11,013.28 7,938.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,890.62 27.47 %

period05 0.00 2,051.70 3,955.04 1,376.64 252.72 855.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,491.22 7.31 %

TOTAL 520.00 14,994.60 18,053.20 15,591.20 39,696.40 27,244.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 116,099.40

0.45 12.92 15.55 13.43 34.19 23.47 0.00 0.00 0.00



period01 520.00 2,992.64 2,850.06 266.76 1,319.76 3,474.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,424.10 11.63 %

period02 0.00 1,882.38 3,136.02 9,124.44 2,393.40 7,082.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,618.56 24.05 %

period03 0.00 3,439.04 6,640.98 491.40 7,411.44 5,173.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,156.30 23.58 %

period04 0.00 4,628.84 5,302.38 5,839.08 4,906.28 10,592.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,269.46 31.84 %

period05 0.00 2,051.70 4,347.36 533.52 252.72 1,551.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,736.98 8.90 %

TOTAL 520.00 14,994.60 22,276.80 16,255.20 16,283.60 27,875.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 98,205.40

0.53 15.27 22.68 16.55 16.58 28.38 0.00 0.00 0.00



5.7. Equipments

WP Description of the equipment Responsible partner Quantity Unit rate Amount

EUR

wp1 IT support for management: 1 laptop including software


1 1,200.00 1,200.00

wp1 professional scanner ERDF PP4 - Galati 1 600.00 600.00

wp1 IT support for management: 1 printer to be used by project managment team


1 800.00 800.00

wp1 A4 inkjet coloured printer ERDF PP4 - Galati 1 1,000.00 1,000.00

WP total 3,600.00


EUR

wp2 IT tools supporting Communication (1 laptop) LP - Municipality of Zuglo

1 1,550.00 1,550.00

wp2 Video conferencing tool LP - Municipality of Zuglo

1 500.00 500.00

wp2 IT tools supporting Communication (1 beemer) LP - Municipality of Zuglo

1 1,000.00 1,000.00

WP total 3,050.00


EUR

wp4 IT equipment for pilot on IT based services to seniors: desktop


1 500.00 500.00

wp4 IT equipment for pilot on IT based services to seniors: Microsoft Office programme and database management software


1 2,000.00 2,000.00



WP total 2,500.00

Total equipments 9,150.00



5.8. Small scale investments



128/138

6. Timeplan

Activites 2011 2012 2013

Jan

uar

y

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

tem

be

r

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

ber

De

cem

ber

Jan

uar

y

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

tem

be

r

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

ber

De

cem

ber

Jan

uar

y

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

tem

be

r

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

ber

De

cem

ber

act 0.1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X

act 1.1 X X X X X

act 1.2 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

act 1.3 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X





act 3.1 X X X X X X

act 3.2 X X X X X X X X X X X

act 3.3 X X X X X X X X X X X X

act 4.1 X X X

act 4.2 X X X X X X X X X X X X





129/138

act 5.2 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X


Activites 2014 2015 2016

Jan

uar

y

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

tem

be

r

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

ber

De

cem

ber

Jan

uar

y

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

tem

be

r

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

ber

De

cem

ber

Jan

uar

y

Feb

ruar

y

Mar

ch

Ap

ril

May

Jun

e

July

Au

gust

Sep

tem

be

r

Oct

ob

er

No

vem

ber

De

cem

ber

act 0.1

act 1.1

act 1.2 X X X X X X X X X






act 3.1

act 3.2 X X X


act 4.1

act 4.2 X X X X X X X X

act 4.3 X X X X X




130/138

act 5.2 X X X X X X X

act 5.3 X X X X



131/138

7. Indicators

7.1. Output

Description Type Mandatory Measurement

unit Base value Target value

Indicators

01. No of articles/appearances published in the press and in other media (including online media, TV, radio)

output No no. 0.00 6.00

02. No of press conferences output No no. 0.00 2.00

03. Average of hits per month on the project?s website


04. No of publications produced (editions, specify: e.g. folder, newsletter, brochure, report, guideline, handbook), No of copies disseminated

output No no. 0.00 9,100.00

05. No of transnational events implemented, no of participants involved


06. No of national events implemented, no of participants involved


07. No of regional events implemented, no of participants involved


08. No of study visits organised, no of participants involved


09. No of studies produced output No no. 0.00 8.00

10. No of guidelines produced


11. No of management plans developed


12. No of joint action plans produced


13. No of databases created or improved


14. No of training events, output No no. 0.00 4.00



132/138



seminars organised

15. No of participants involved in trainings and seminars


16. No of individuals that participated in exchange schemes


17. No of promotion concepts


18. No of promotion actions output No no. 0.00 7.00

19. No of services developed output No no. 0.00 4.00

20. No of small scale infrastructure projects


21. No of person in charge for administration of projects


22. No of project meetings held


Project specific indicators

Transnational Advisory Panel

output No number 0.00 1.00

Transnational Silver City Action Plan

output No number 0.00 1.00

7.2. Result



Indicators

01. No of permanent information sources / channels in project (e.g. websites, regular publications)

result No no. 0.00 3.00

02. No of individuals reached directly through dissemination outputs in the co-operation area

result No no. 0.00 49,805.00

03. No of administrative actors reached directly through dissemination




133/138



outputs in the co-operation area

04. No of private sector actors reached directly through dissemination outputs in the co-operation area


05. No of SME reached directly through dissemination outputs in the co-operation area


06. No of advanced tools and methodologies adopted to increase the projects visibility among experts and wider communities, the public (additionally description necessary)


07. No of common positions / agreements formulated


08. No of common methodologies adopted


09. No of strategies adopted at governmental level


10. No of innovative products developed


11. No of regional/local policies and instruments improved or developed


12. No of common standards established (e.g. through new guidelines)


13. No of new tools / instruments developed


14. No of impact studies on environmental issues carried out (e.g. in pre-investment projects)


15. No of pilot actions prepared (first application)


16. No of pilot actions implemented (first application)




134/138



17. No permanent exchange programmes established


18. No of staff members with increased capacity (awareness / knowledge / skills)


19. No of advanced tools and methodologies adopted to improve knowledge management within the partnership (additionally description necessary)


20. No of regions proactively promoted


21. No of common management structures / systems established


22. No of individuals benefiting directly from new / improved services

result No no. 0.00 14,000.00

23. No of investment proposals developed (if possible specify volume of investment)


24. No of private market reactions achieved (e.g. private activities mobilized)


25. No of investment projects implemented (specify volume of investment)


26. No of infrastructures of common interest improved


Project specific indicators

8. Other Data

8.1. Codes for the Priority Theme Dimension

71 - Pathways to integration and re-entry into employment for disadvantaged people; combating discrimination in accessing and progressing in the labour market and promoting acceptance of diversity at



135/138

the workplace

8.2. Keywords

Demographic change / migration

Entrepreneur(ship), start-ups, businesses

Governance

ICT

Knowledge transfer

Labour market

Policentric development

Urban / peri-urban development



136/138

9. Checklist

Check Fulfilled (YES/NO)

The application form and all its annexes are in the working language of the Programme (English) and all required parts are duly filled in.

YES

All annexes of the application form are submitted by all relevant partners. They are printed on headed paper, signed, dated and stamped and included in the application pack in original version.

YES

No "ERROR" messages are displayed. YES

The applicant has verified the compliance of the application with the eligibility criteria of the SEE Transnational Programme described in the programme documents.

YES

The application form is dated, stamped and signed by a duly authorised representative of the Lead partner and submitted within the fixed deadline.

YES



137/138

10. Annexes

Code Name Mandatory Channel Attached/Sent Piece

1 Annex 1: Partnership agreement

YES Paper and electronic

YES 1

2 Annex 2: Declaration of pre-financing and co-financing statement


YES 1

3 Annex 3: State Aid declaration


YES 1

4 Annex 4: Data sheet on the Member state responsible body

NO Paper and electronic

NO 0

5 Annex 5: ASP and Observer Declaration


YES 1

6 Annex 6: ENPI Application Form (including annex B budget and annex C logical framework)


NO 0

7 Annex 6: ENPI Legal entity sheet (and its supporting documents)


NO 0

8 Annex 6: ENPI Financial identification form


NO 0

9 Annex 6: ENPI supporting documents (Statutes

NO Paper and electroni

NO 0



138/138

or articles of association and latest accounts)

c

see programme document reg. no.: intra-5185124 application form · 2013-02-18 · see programme...

Documents