seminar on smart cities roskilde university 2015
TRANSCRIPT
Claude Rochet
Urban lifecycle management :
A research program for smart
government of smart cities
Prof. Claude Rochet
http://claude-rochet.fr
1
Roskilde Universitet21/12/2015
What means “Smart”= presence of a learning feedback loop
2
Action Effect
feedbackfrom 0,0001sec. to a génération
Sensors
Data
TreatmentInterpretation
Usage
Decision
Technologies
Social sciences
Iconomy
When speaking of smart cities, what does it means?
Efficient urbanization
Inclusive urbanization
Sustainable urbanization
3
Complex System Architecture: What are the key functions and their (un) desirable interactions?
System Integration: Granting people the same capacity to interact and have control over the urban system
Ecosystem modeling: Autopoiesis, resilience, scalability, innovation coordination
The smart city and the temptation of the totalitarian utopia
• Utopia= A perfect city
in a perfect world
1896
1517
1623
1898
Are IT the new totalitarian utopia?
What a smart city can’t be
• A collection of « smarties »
• A techno centric city
• A city without past
• A deterministic system
Smart city => Smart territory
Modeling a smart city: an imperfect city in an imperfect world
• A dead end: The temptation of
the ideal city : XX century
garden cities, techno-centric
approaches Masdar, Songdo…
• A city is a living system
6
What modelling means?
The Lego game:
• The construction is based on
standardized building blocks
• No two figures are alike
• These blocks are structured in
patterns: recurrent problems +
improved solutions + rules of
integration using semantic + syntax
• The final result in an integration
which is specific to needs and
specifications
7
Definition: A pattern is a stable and reusable configuration, including physical elements in relation with their environment,…. Which solves a problem integrating on a non conflicting way all the constraints... Is a system of forces
Exemple: Multi functions mail box
Recevoir son courrier Poster tout type
de courrier sans se déplacer
Trajet < 10’ AR sans véhicule à moteur
Recevoir un recommandé en son absence
Améliorer la rapidité des tournées et l’exactitude de la distribution
BAL multifonctions
Tournée
21/12/2015
Claude Rochet
A rationale for a smart city a system architect:
A three steps approach
• Strategic analysis
• Inventorying the functions
• Integrating the ecosystem
• Strategic alignment
9
Must do
May do
How to do it?
Vision
A rationale for a smart city a system architect:1- Strategic analysis
10
Why building a city & what are the strategic goals? Who
are the stakeholders?
What are the generic functions to be performed by
a smart city?
With which organs? Technical devices, software…
With which smart people?
Conception, metamodel framework, steering
Subsystems and processes
People and tools
Why designing this ecosystem?Who will live in the city?What are its activities?
How the city will be fed?Where the city is located ? (context)
What are the functions to be performed to reach the goals and how do they interact?
With which organs and ressources?
How people will interact with the artifacts?
How civic life will organize?
Claude Rochet
A rationale for a smart city a system architect:2- Inventorying the “building blocks”
11/09/201412
Issues
• Defining “smartness”and “sustainability”
• Wealth creation• Finance and taxes• Controlling pollution• Equilibrium center –
periphery• Migrations• Poverty• Education• Health• Crime• Segregation (social
and spatial)• Leisure• Quality of life• How people interact
with people and artifacts?
• The New Business Models:
• Public
• Private
• Project management
• Institutional arrangements
• The day to day decision making process in an evolutionary perspective
• Empowerment
• Direct democracy
• Government
• Governance
• Project management
• Social innovation
• The state as a system engineer
• Mastering ULM
Functions
• Work• Budgeting• Transportation• Feeding• Caring• Protecting• Securing• Housing policy• Education• Leisure• Social benefits• Health care
system• Migrations
control
Resources
• Energy• Water• Data• Digital Systems• Traditions• Sociology• Technologies as
enablers and enacters
• Culture and traditions
• Institutions and public organizations
• Process modeling• Software• Tech providers• Open innovation
Capabilities
Claude Rochet
11/09/201413
A rationale for a smart city a system architect:3- Integration of the building blocks
Soft domains Hard domains
SMART city
TransportationIndustry
WorkHousing
Sanitation
EnergyWater
Waste recycling
Public services Health care
Civic life Leisure
Education Social integration
Go
ver
nm
ent
Eco
no
my
Institutional scaffolding
Social life
Periphery
City
Territory
Commercial exchanges
Food
Problems in smart cities ecosystem modeling
Hard systems may
be models thanks
to the laws of
physics
(conservative
systems)
Soft systems can’t
be modeled with
the laws of physics
(dissaptive
systems)
- Social siences
- Big data- Multi-agents
modeling
The key of the
success is here…
… while
business is there
System integration, a key
competency to be developed
How does integration works?Conceiving organic autopoeitic systems
NO! An evolutionary process
Integration process is bottom-up…… based on ordinary interactions
We must understand how ordinary people behave
Q: Is there an architect with a master plan?
Bottom up patterns integration: social intelligence
A smart city as an autopoetic
ecosystem must be designed as
an imperfect city in an
imperfect world able to reframe
itself according to the evolution of
its environment.
Integration is not made once and
for all but is a permanent
process all along the urban
lifecycle. A smart integration is
made according the ends of the
city and must be citizen
centered and not techno
centered.
smartphoneWiredphone
Wifi Lifi
A human connectedeverywhere
Integrating patterns bottom-up frombasic to complex functions
Démultiplier les fonctions d’un objet urbain par les usages
Optimiser la polyvalence des ressources énergie et données
Rendre le déplacement sûr, ludique et pertinent
Fortifier le lien social par les nouvelles connexions
Tout bâti et tout service doit être conçu de manière modulaire et évolutive pour gérer les cycles d’innovation
Mobilier urbain multifonction
Consommer juste
BAL multifonction
Contrôle commande de l’énergie électrique
Traitement de la donnée
Recréer de la proximité grâce à l’Internet
Intégrer les cycles d’innovation
The case of
Functionnalpatterns
Techno organicpatterns
In / out
Urban ecosystem : three perimeters:
first the city itself where the synergies and interactions are the
stronger and have the most “eco” properties.
Second the periphery: one may refer here to the model defined by
Thünen representing the city with a succession of concentric
rings going from the highest increasing return activities at the
center city to decreasing return activities at the periphery.
third is the external environment with witch the city exchanges
Ville: synergies les plus fortesVille: synergies les plus
fortesVille: synergies les
plus fortes
Ville: synergies les plus fortes
Ville: synergies les plus fortes
Services à forte V.A
Activités primaires
à faible V.A
Rendements
croissants
décroissants
Defining metrics to measure the global balance of the ecosystem
• Integrating imported
pollution, energy waste….
produced by a
dysfunctional
ecosystem
• Is the city really green?
The research program
Claude Rochet
A tool to design and monitor the ecosystem: ULM (Urban Lifecycle Management©)
21
Ma
turi
ty o
f ec
osy
ste
mic
pro
pe
rtie
s
Development
From history, social intelligence, idea, to framework Integrating off-the-
shelves innovation
Functional integration
Technical integration
Designing the engineering ecosystem
Project management
City 1.0
Gathering data and understanding ecosystem evolution
Evaluating, correcting and upgrading
Sustainable City 1.0
Integrating innovation
City 2.0
Risk of collapse
Losing ecosystemic properties
Permanent improvement
Financial governance
Socio political cycle
Innovation cycle
New City
The integration of disciplines
Social intelligence & social capital
Complex systems architecture
Complex projects management
Analytics, big data & software code
Direct democracy
PLM integration
Managing resilience
Datafication
23
Legacy: How the city has evolved in the past
•Hard data: statistics•Soft data: human memory=> understanding the technological trajectory and social capital
Present and future: Understanding how the city is evolving
•Observatory for hard and soft data•Big dataUnderstanding the present behavior=> Evaluating the scalability and resilience, improving social capital
Requisites for a successful integration
• Common standards
for data => Chief Data
Officers
• Common standards
for building: BIM
• Vivere politico as
permanent integrative
process
Integrating PLM
25
Innovation within building blocks has different speeds
With smart networks innovation cycles are connected:(before, no): a permanent challenge
The city dweller is the decider in last resort of the impact of any innovation on the city life: Good/Bad, useful/unusual, improve/kill
Power to technology or to citizens?
Correlations => Induction
Deduction =>Hypotheses
Where is the brain?
Existing knowledge
Resilience: avoiding the trap of the self contained city and preventing collapse
Thresholds
System out of orderNormal
Specific and foreseen
Unforeseen catastrophes
Source : Christian Morel
The city as an HRO
Improving social capital, bottom-up vs. top-down: The case of Christchurch (NZ)
28
Citizen produce ideas
Producing and structuring ideas
Integration of disciplines
31
Lev
els
of
com
ple
xit
y
City
Functions
Citizens
Complex systems engineering
Extended P.A Political philosophy
Complex system
modeling
Interaction and synergies
Social networks and interactions
Overlaps and interactions
Common good as an emergence and
structuring finality
Ends and means of wealth creation
Civic implication
PolycentricGovce
The research and training program
• Integrating and upgrading into smart
cities issues the basics of complex
systems architecture as a basic
baggage for SC stake holders
• Learning by doing: Applied research
to the building of pilot projects
• Convergence of disciplines:
engineering, social sciences, urban
sociology, system architecture, political
philosophy, complex decision making
32
Merci!
33
Thank you!