senators regret environment/energy bill vote

3
Minnesota Senate April 30, 2015 Senator Tom Bakk Senator Richard Cohen Dear Senator Bakk and Senator Cohen: We are writing to express our dismay over the amendments that were adopted on the Senate Floor to S.F. 2101 on April 22, Earth Day, and ask for your leadership to address these concerns. Many of us regret voting for the senate bill with the adoption of the bad floor amendments. Many of the amendments adopted on the floor, and several of the policy provisions in the bill, were not heard or considered in any policy committee. These amendments represent major policy shifts for the state and were adopted without public participation or the opportunity for senate members to understand the sweeping impact of these measures. Some amendments, such as the Energy Intensive, Trade-Exposed (EITE) industry electric rates provision, do not represent the policy which actually passed the Environment and Energy Policy Committeerather it is language which has not been vetted but has statewide impact and significant consumer protection issues. In addition to our concerns about process, there are provisions in the bill that are simply bad for Minnesota. At a time when we are regularly seeing reports of community water supplies across the state not being safe to drink, the Senate joined the House in voting to undermine the authority of our state agencies to implement our existing clean water standards. These standards, to protect and restore the quality of our lakes, rivers and streams, were developed over ten years through a painstaking process of scientific research, peer review and public outreach. An attack on these standards and our agencies’ ability to implement them is an attack on the very mission of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and other agencies charged with protecting the environment and public health. Furthermore, it denigrates the hard work and professionalism of our public servants by politicizing what should remain a scientific process. The Senate has done an excellent job developing and passing budget bills that separate volatile policy provisions from the budget process, with this one glaring exception. This bill has become highly politicized in the process. It is out of sync with the voters of the state and is out of step with core Minnesota values to protect our great outdoors.

Upload: dunb0019

Post on 12-Nov-2015

2.311 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A group of 13 Minnesota senators signed a letter regretting their vote for an omnibus environment and energy bill that included both budget and policy provisions.

TRANSCRIPT

  • Minnesota Senate

    April 30, 2015

    Senator Tom Bakk

    Senator Richard Cohen

    Dear Senator Bakk and Senator Cohen:

    We are writing to express our dismay over the amendments that were adopted on the

    Senate Floor to S.F. 2101 on April 22, Earth Day, and ask for your leadership to address

    these concerns. Many of us regret voting for the senate bill with the adoption of the bad

    floor amendments.

    Many of the amendments adopted on the floor, and several of the policy provisions in the

    bill, were not heard or considered in any policy committee. These amendments represent

    major policy shifts for the state and were adopted without public participation or the

    opportunity for senate members to understand the sweeping impact of these measures.

    Some amendments, such as the Energy Intensive, Trade-Exposed (EITE) industry electric

    rates provision, do not represent the policy which actually passed the Environment and

    Energy Policy Committeerather it is language which has not been vetted but has statewide impact and significant consumer protection issues.

    In addition to our concerns about process, there are provisions in the bill that are simply

    bad for Minnesota. At a time when we are regularly seeing reports of community water

    supplies across the state not being safe to drink, the Senate joined the House in voting to

    undermine the authority of our state agencies to implement our existing clean water

    standards.

    These standards, to protect and restore the quality of our lakes, rivers and streams, were

    developed over ten years through a painstaking process of scientific research, peer review

    and public outreach. An attack on these standards and our agencies ability to implement them is an attack on the very mission of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and

    other agencies charged with protecting the environment and public health. Furthermore, it

    denigrates the hard work and professionalism of our public servants by politicizing what

    should remain a scientific process.

    The Senate has done an excellent job developing and passing budget bills that separate

    volatile policy provisions from the budget process, with this one glaring exception. This

    bill has become highly politicized in the process. It is out of sync with the voters of the

    state and is out of step with core Minnesota values to protect our great outdoors.

  • We ask that you use your power to remove these provisions from the Senate bill. Both the

    House environment and natural resources omnibus budget and House energy omnibus

    budget bills have been characterized as some of the worst policy propagated on these

    topics. One expert characterizing the House energy bill as eviscerating thirty years of progressive energy policy.

    While our concerns about SF2101 are strong, they pale in comparison to the deeply

    destructive environment and energy policy provisions contained in the House companion

    bills. For your convenience, we have enclosed lists of troubling environment and energy

    provisions contained within the House budget legislation.

    Many members of our caucus reluctantly supported the budget bill despite strong

    concerns about the harmful environment and energy policy contained in it. We ask you

    find a path forward that recognizes that this legislation puts many members of our caucus

    in an unfair position of either rejecting the budget, or voting for unreasonable policies.

    We ask you to follow through on your commitment to keep these controversial provisions

    out of the budget debate. Holding the state budget hostage to these harsh attacks on

    Minnesotas environment is not acceptable.

    Sincerely,

    _________________________________ __________________________________

    Senator Sandy Pappas Senator Katie Sieben

    _________________________________ __________________________________

    Senator Melisa Franzen Senator Jim Carlson

    _________________________________ __________________________________

    Senator Scott Dibble Senator Susan Kent

    _________________________________ __________________________________

    Senator Chris Eaton Senator Greg Clausen

  • _________________________________ __________________________________

    Senator Bev Scalze Senator Patricia Torres Ray

    _________________________________ __________________________________

    Senator Ron Latz Senator Kevin Dahle

    __________________________________

    Senator Barb Goodwin

    cc: Governor Mark Dayton

    Senator David Tomassoni

    Molly Pederson