sepsis as a medical emergency global sepsis alliance jim o’brien, md, msc professor assistant...
TRANSCRIPT
Sepsis as a Medical Emergency
Global Sepsis AllianceJim O’Brien, MD, MScProfessor Assistant Director, Medical Intensive Care Unit The Ohio State University Medical Center Sepsis Alliance, Board of Directors
Disclosures, 2004-present
•University grant monies: • Davis/Bremer Medical Research Award ($50K, 3/05 – 2/07)
•Non-industry grant monies: • NHLBI K23 HL075076 ($520,992, 4/05 – 3/09); • NIH Clinical Research Loan Repayment Program ($152,781, 10/03-6/05, 7/06-6/10 )
•Industry grant monies: • PI for aerosolized amikacin (Aerogen, $0, 8/05 – 6/06)• PI for calfactant (Pneuma, $0, 9/08 – current)
•Consultant/Speakers’ Bureau: • Gave lecture on future perspectives on sepsis definitions. Honorarium from Brahms
donated to Sepsis Alliance. I received airfare and two night’s hotel accommodations totaling approximately $1500 in value (2009).
• Unrestricted educational grant from Lilly to present talk at SCCM (2005)• Consultant to Medical Simulation Corporation ($4000, 2005-2006)• Co-author on manuscript with Lilly employees• Consultant to Keimar, Inc ($0)• Board of Directors, Sepsis Alliance
I think sepsis is under-appreciated.
I think sepsis is under-funded.
I think we over-complicate sepsis care (MD effect)
I think that I have less to offer septic patients once they are in the ICU.
I think that it is inevitable that we will get our act together. Only question is how many of us will die first.
•What is sepsis?
•How common is sepsis?
•What causes sepsis?
•How do you treat sepsis?
•84yo Caucasian male with h/o Parkinson’s and remote history of gun shot wound
•Presents to the ED from his residence with altered mental status, fever and smelly urine
•Temp 102.3 P 118 R 32 BP 78/34 •84% SPO2
Karol Wojtyla (1920-2005)
Pre and post-discharge
Hospitalization
24 hours
6 hours
Recognition
Resuscitation
Initial Management
Maintenance
Recovery
Sepsis Recognition in OSUMC ED
Patients admitted through ED Main Jan-March 2009
(n = 4951)
Patients with sepsis upon ED presentation
(n = 137, 27.4%)
Recognized as septic inED notes and/or H&P
(n = 35, 25.5%)
Not recognized as septic in ED notes and/or H&P
(n = 102, 74.4%)
Randomly selected charts reviewed
(n = 500, 53.1%)
Received ATBs within 24 hrs of admission
(n = 941, 19.0%)
Dreher et al Manuscript in preparation
That extrapolates to 768 unrecognized septic patients/year at
OSU Main ED alone!
That extrapolates to 768 unrecognized septic patients/year at
OSU Main ED alone!
So what is sepsis anyway?
According to the Consensus definition, what is sepsis?
1. Blood poisoning
2. Bacteremia
3. Shock due to infection
4. Fever due to infection
5. None of the above
Sepsis: Defining a Disease Continuum
SIRS = Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
SepsisSepsisSIRSSIRSInfection/Infection/TraumaTrauma
Severe SepsisSevere Sepsis
, et al. Chest 1992;101:1644, Opal SM, et al. Crit Care Med 2000;28:S81
SIRS with a presumed orconfirmed infectious
process
According to the Consensus Conference definition, which of the following is NOT a SIRS criterion?
1. SBP<90 and/or MAP <70
2. Heart rate >90
3. Respiratory rate >20 or PaCO2<32
4. Temperature >38⁰C or <36⁰C
5. WBC >12K or <4K or >10% bands
Sepsis: Defining a Disease Continuum
A clinical response arising from a nonspecific insult, including 2 of the following:
•Temperature 38oC or 36oC•HR 90 beats/min•Respirations 20/min•WBC count 12,000/mm3 or 4,000/mm3 or >10% immature
neutrophils
SIRS = Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
SepsisSepsisSIRSSIRSInfection/Infection/TraumaTrauma
Severe SepsisSevere Sepsis
Adapted from: Bone RC, et al. Chest 1992;101:1644 Opal SM, et al. Crit Care Med 2000;28:S81
•84yo Caucasian male with h/o Parkinson’s and remote history of gun shot wound
•Presents to the ED from his residence with altered mental status, fever and smelly urine
•Temp 102.3 P 118 R 32 BP 78/34 •84% SPO2
Does he have sepsis?
Is he sick or not sick?
• Sepsis with 1 sign of organ failure• Cardiovascular (refractory
hypotension)• Renal• Respiratory• Hepatic• Hematologic• CNS• Metabolic acidosis
Sepsis: Defining a Disease Continuum
SepsisSepsisSIRSSIRSInfection/Infection/TraumaTrauma
Severe SepsisSevere Sepsis
Bone et al. Chest 1992;101:1644; Wheeler and Bernard. N Engl J Med 1999;340:207
TachycardiaHypotensionAltered CVP
Altered PAOP
OliguriaAnuria
Creatinine
Platelets PT/APTT Protein C D-dimer
Jaundice Enzymes Albumin
PT
Altered Consciousness
ConfusionPsychosis
TachypneaPaO2 <70 mm Hg
SaO2 <90%
PaO2/FiO2 300
Neurologic
Respiratory
Hepatic
Renal
Coagulation
Cardiovascular
Mortality increases with increasing organ failure
Hebert et al. Chest 1993;104:230-5
How sick is he?
•WBC 30K with 20% bands
•Shock
•ABG 7.20/28/42/15 on 100% FiO2
•Platelets normal, INR 1.7
•LFTs normal
•BUN 32, Creatinine 1.9
•Delirious
This seems kind of bad.Glad it doesn’t happen much
RECOGNITION
Sepsis incidence, 1999-2003
Sepsis Severe Sepsis Septic shock Death in sepsis
Inci
dence
X10
3
22%22%
44%44%
73%73%
O’Brien et al. Under review
Sepsis incidence, 1999-2003
Sepsis Severe Sepsis Septic shock Death in sepsis
Inci
dence
X10
3
O’Brien et al. Under review
In 2003,
1 in 35 of ALL hospital admissions involved sepsis
1 in 66 involved severe sepsis
1 in 233 involved septic shock
Sepsis incidence, 1999-2003
Sepsis Severe Sepsis Septic shock Death in sepsis
Inci
dence
X10
3
O’Brien et al. Under review
20.7%21.7% 16%
16%
Sepsis incidence, 1999-2003
Sepsis Severe Sepsis Septic shock Death in sepsis
Inci
dence
X10
3
O’Brien et al. Under review
20.7%21.7% 16%
16%
In 2003,
1 in 35 of ALL hospital admissions involved sepsis
1 in 66 involved severe sepsis
1 in 233 involved septic shock
22%22%
44%44%
73%73%
16%16%
In 2003, 23.2% of all deaths during hospitalization involved sepsis
(up from 19.4% in 1999)
In other words…. 1 in 4.3 deaths of hospitalized patients
involves sepsis
215,000 deaths a year in US
228 Deathsevery ~9 h
2974 Deaths Every ~5 days
Deaths fromBreast cancerLung Cancer
+ Prostate CancerTOTAL < Deaths from Sepsis
Deaths fromBreast cancerLung Cancer
+ Prostate CancerTOTAL < Deaths from Sepsis
Severe Sepsis Costs a Lot
Angus et al, Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1303-10
•Average LOS 19.6 days•Average cost $22,100/case•Total national hospital cost was $16.7 BILLION•52.3% of costs in those >64 years•30.8% total costs in those >74 years
Age
Average per-patient cost
Total national cost
This doesn’t sound that greatMaybe we should figure out what causes this
Risk factors and Pathogenesis
The Pathogenesis of Sepsis
Response to Stimulus
•Inflammation•Immunosuppression
•Coagulopathy•Mitochondrial dysfunction
Infectious Agents
•Endotoxin/LPS•Lipopeptides•Lipoteichoic acid•DNA•Flagellin
Susceptible Host
•Co-morbidities•Age•Genetic polymorphisms
SEPSIS
Organisms Found in Sepsis
Only about 30% have a positive blood culture
Martin et al, NEJM 2003:348;1546-54.
Sites of Infection in Severe Sepsis
Angus et al, Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 1303-10
Association of Clinical Risk Factors with Sepsis and Severe Sepsis
Adapted from O’Brien et al. Am J Med 2007.
TREATMENT
All right, all right, I get it.
But isn’t that guy dying on us?
Shouldn’t we do something about that?
Pre and post-discharge
Hospitalization
24 hours
6 hours
Suspicion
Resuscitation
Initial Management
Maintenance
Recovery
Which of these is sepsis?
1. Confusion, cough, nausea
2. Fever, shortness of breath, chest pain
3. Abdominal pain, lightheadedness, diarrhea
4. Rash, leg swelling, anorexia
5. Tachycardia, chills, sweating
We have to ACT when we are uncertain.
We have to ACT when we are uncertain.
Pre and post-discharge
Hospitalization
24 hours
6 hours
Recognition
Resuscitation
Initial Management
Maintenance
Recovery
Suspicion
Antibiotic Therapy & Blood Cultures
All subjects Recognized
Not recognized
P value
Hours to Order 1.9 (1.1 – 3.0)
1.3 (1.0 – 2.0)
2.1 (1.3 – 3.5)
0.012
Hours to Administration
2.6 (1.9 – 3.9)
2.1 (1.7 – 3.7)
2.8 (2.0 – 4.5)
0.043
p = 0.004 p = 0.165 p = 0.001
All Subjects: 56.2% 30.7% 77.4%
Dre
her
et
al M
an
usc
rip
t in
pre
para
tion
…
RESUSCITATION PHASEGOAL: Keep him alive for 24 hours
•A – Airway• Intubation
•B – Breathing• Mechanical ventilation
•C – Circulation• IV access• IV volume• Vasopressors• Goal directed therapy
Treat theInfection
Antibiotics – Go BIG early
• Every hour in delay of appropriate atbx = 7.6% lower survival
• Median time to appropriate atbx = 6h
Get cxs before atbx if WON’T DELAY ATBXBegin IV atbx ASAP and ALWAYS within 1h
Use broad-spectrum atbx with activity against bugs and sites
Kumar et al. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1589-96.
The first 12 hours matters even more
Funk and Kumar, Crit Care Clinics 2011; 53-76.
For first 12 hours, 1% mortality per 5 minute delay
For first 12 hours, 1% mortality per 5 minute delay
Shock to effective antibiotic time and mortality in septic shock*
Adapted from Kumar et al. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1589-96.
*Assuming 130,000 septic shock cases per year
By getting shock-to-antibiotic times of <2h for ALL septic shock
patients,we would save
32,360 lives per year.(89 people a day)
Septic Shock in OSUMC MICUs
Pre-intervention During Intervention Post Intervention
8/24/08 – 12/31/08 1/1/09 – 3/31/09 4/1/09 – 6/7/10
N 121 82 281
Time to atbx in hrs, median (IQR)
5.4 (1.7 – 11.5)
1.7 (0.2 – 3.8)
2.0 (1.0 – 5.2)
Atbx within 2 hours 29.8% 56.1% 50.5%
Patients with sepsis onset within 24h of ICU admissionSOFA shock score of >0
Septic Shock in OSUMC MICUsPre-
interventionDuring
InterventionPost
Intervention
8/24/08 – 12/31/08
1/1/09 – 3/31/09
4/1/09 – 6/7/10
Hospital mortality 36 (26.4%) 21 (25.6%) 56 (19.9%)
Observed/Expected Mortality Ratio (SAPS II)
0.41 0.35 0.30
Expected deaths if O/E as in Pre-intervention period
24.8 77.0
Lives saved 3.8 (in 3 months)
21.0(in 14 months)
Patients with sepsis onset within 24h of ICU admissionSOFA shock score of >0
Addressing circulation in sepsis
•Why is circulation affected in sepsis?• Dehydration
• Loss of vascular tone
• Loss of endothelial integrity
• Shunting
• Occlusion
• Decreased cardiac output
•How is circulation addressed in sepsis?• Replete intravascular
volume
• Vasopressors
• Interventions directed at oxygen delivery:extraction balance
HEART
ARTERIESVEINS
ORGANS
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
HEART
ARTERIESVEINS
ORGANS
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
STEP 1: Make sure the pump is full
(volume depletion)
The C in the ABCs:Volume Resuscitation
Assess for Volume Depletion•History
•Exam - Organ perfusion – skin, brain, kidneys•Measure intravascular pressures – arterial, central venous
Assess for Volume Depletion•History
•Exam - Organ perfusion – skin, brain, kidneys•Measure intravascular pressures – arterial, central venous
Administer a “Fluid Challenge”•1000mL crystalloid OR 500mL colloid
•Intravenous over 30 minutes
See what happens•Blood pressure (mean arterial pressure
>65)•Central venous pressure 8-12•Urine output 0.5 ml/kg/h
•Heart rate
See what happens•Blood pressure (mean arterial pressure
>65)•Central venous pressure 8-12•Urine output 0.5 ml/kg/h
•Heart rate
A Comparison of Albumin and Saline for FluidResuscitation in the Intensive Care Unit
NEJM 2004; 350: 2247-56
•N=6997
•Randomized to NS or 4% albumin for any resuscitation
•In patients with severe sepsis:
• 30.7% mortality with albumin
• 35.3% mortality with NS
HEART
ARTERIESVEINS
ORGANS
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
STEP 2: Make the train is on a fast track (vascular
tone)
STEP 1: Make sure the pump is full
(volume depletion)
The C in the ABCs:Vasopressors In Septic Shock
Heart Rate Contractility Vasoconstriction
Dopamine
Low dose 0 0 1-
Medium dose 2+ 2+ 0
High dose 2+ 2+ 3+
Dobutamine 1+ 4+ 1-
Norepinephrine 2+ 2+ 4+
Phenylephrine 2- 0 4+
Epinephrine 4+ 4+ 4+
Vasopressin* 0 1- 3+
HEART
ARTERIESVEINS
ORGANS
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
STEP 2: Make the train is on a fast track (vascular
tone)
STEP 1: Make sure the pump is full
(volume depletion)
STEP 3: See if supply is keeping up with demand
Step 3: Is oxygen supply keeping up with demand?
Central venous O2 saturation
Reflects oxygen extractionby tissue, relative to
oxygen delivery
Lactate clearanceReflects transitionfrom anaerobic to
aerobic metabolism
Oxygen delivery is determined by:Hemoglobin
Cardiac output Arterial oxygen saturation
Interventions to address oxygen delivery/consumption balance
Optimize venous filling pressures, arterial blood pressure
Optimize venous filling pressures, arterial blood pressure
Imbalance between O2 delivery: extraction-CVO2<70%
-Lactate clearance <10%
Imbalance between O2 delivery: extraction-CVO2<70%
-Lactate clearance <10%
Hgb <10?Hgb <10?
DobutamineDobutamine
TransfuseTransfuse
Increase COIncrease CO
YES
YESNO
EGDT – “Rivers” resulted in different care
Control EGDT p
Crystalloid, mean, L
0-<6h 3.5 5.0 <0.0001
6-72h 10.6 8.6 0.01
Vasopressors
0-<6h 30.3% 27.4% 0.62
6-72h 42.9% 29.1% 0.03
Dobutamine
0-<6h 0.8% 13.7% <0.0001
6-72h 8.4% 14.5% 0.14
PRCs
0-<6h 18.5% 64.1% <0.0001
6-72h 32.8% 11.1% <0.0001
N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368
Control EGDT P
Hospital mortality
46.5% 30.5% 0.009
28d mortality 49.2% 33.3% 0.01
60d mortality 56.9% 44.3% 0.03
EGDT – “Rivers” resulted in different care
Control EGDT p
Crystalloid, mean, L
0-<6h 3.5 5.0 <0.0001
6-72h 10.6 8.6 0.01
Vasopressors
0-<6h 30.3% 27.4% 0.62
6-72h 42.9% 29.1% 0.03
Dobutamine
0-<6h 0.8% 13.7% <0.0001
6-72h 8.4% 14.5% 0.14
PRCs
0-<6h 18.5% 64.1% <0.0001
6-72h 32.8% 11.1% <0.0001
N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368
Control EGDT P
Hospital mortality
46.5% 30.5% 0.009
28d mortality 49.2% 33.3% 0.01
60d mortality 56.9% 44.3% 0.03
An approach using lactate clearance (vs EGDT/CVO2) resulted in nearly identical care and
similar outcomes.
Hospital mortalityLactate clearance = 17%
EGDT/CVO2 = 23%
JAMA 2010;303:739-46
An approach using lactate clearance (vs EGDT/CVO2) resulted in nearly identical care and
similar outcomes.
Hospital mortalityLactate clearance = 17%
EGDT/CVO2 = 23%
JAMA 2010;303:739-46
•Patient is given piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin and vancomycin
•Central venous catheter placed, CVP=3•Given fluid challenge and requires norepinephrine•Ultimately receives 8L of normal saline in first 4h of presentation, CVP 12
•Intubated for respiratory failure
•CXR shows bilateralinfiltrates
Pre and post-discharge
Hospitalization
24 hours
6 hours
Recognition
Resuscitation
Initial Management
Maintenance
Recovery
INITIAL MANAGEMENT PHASEGOAL: Let’s get him better
•Supportive care
• Identify organ failures
• Customize antibiotics based on cultures/sensitivities
• Additional diagnostic testing
• Goals of care discussions
•Specific care
• Drotrecogin alfa (activated) [Xigris®]
• Lung protective ventilation
• Conservative fluid management
APC Links Coagulation & Inflammation
N Engl J Med 2001;344:699-709.
Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) Significantly Reduced Mortality in PROWESS
Bernard GR, et al. N Engl J Med 2001;344:699-709.
00 77 1414 2121 2828
7070
8080
9090
100100
Days from Start of Infusion to DeathDays from Start of Infusion to Death
Perc
ent S
urvi
vors
Perc
ent S
urvi
vors
P=.006 (stratified log-rank test)00
Placebo(n=840)
Drotrecogin alfa (activated) (n=850)
6% Absolute 6% Absolute mortality mortality differencedifference
NNT = 17NNT = 17
Patient selection is important
•“High risk” of dying
•APACHE II score >24 NNT = 8
•Multi-organ failure NNT=14
•Respiratory failure NNT=17
•Shock NNT=15
•40% probability of dying?
•“Low risk” of bleeding
•serious bleeding: 2 to 5%
•ICH: 0.2 to 0.5%
•Bleeding associated with: Instrumentation Trauma Thrombocytopenia (<30) Meningitis INR >3
Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome … see prior talk
•Started on drotrecogin alfa (activated) for septic shock with high risk of death
•Tidal volumes reduced to 6 ml/kg PBW•Placed on continuous renal replacement therapy for
sepsis-associated renal failure•Blood and urine cultures grow E. coli – antibiotics changed
to imipenem based on antibiotic sensitivities•Shock resolves over 4d•10kg heavier than admit weight
Pre and post-discharge
Hospitalization
24 hours
6 hours
Recognition
Resuscitation
Initial Management
Maintenance
Recovery
MAINTENANCE PHASEGOAL: Don’t kill him
•Avoid nosocomial complications
• Ventilator-induced lung injury
• Get tubes and lines out of him
• Clots and bleeding
•Avoid new infection
• Hand washing
• Semi-recumbent position
• Get tubes and lines out of him
•Minimize transfusions
•Maintained on continuous infusions of benzodiazepines and opioids for “papal comfort”
•Oxygenation improves but doesn’t wake up after sedative stopped
•CT head negative•Gets 2u packed red cells for Hgb 8.0•Develops hospital-associated pneumonia and catheter-related
blood stream infection•Discharged to long-term acute care hospital with tracheostomy
tube and percutaneous feeding tube after 28 days in ICU
Pre and post-discharge
Hospitalization
24 hours
6 hours
Recognition
Resuscitation
Initial Management
Maintenance
Recovery
Long-term Cognitive Impairment and Functional Disability Among Survivors of Severe Sepsis
•Compared 516 severe sepsis survivors with 4517 survivors of non-sepsis hospitalization
•Prevalence of mod/severe cognitive impairment increased by 10.6% after sepsis AdjOR 3.34 (95% CI 1.53 – 7.25)
•Severe sepsis associated with development of 1.5 new limitations in ADLs More rapid rate of developing further limitations
•59% of sepsis survivors had worsened cognitive and/or physical function
•Significantly worse than for non-sepsis hospitalizations
Iwashyna et al. JAMA 2010;304(16):1787-94
What is it?
•SIRS + Infection = Sepsis
•Sepsis + Organ Failure = Severe Sepsis
•Sepsis + Shock = Septic Shock
•Mortality increases with more organ failure
How common is it?
•Significant mortality – Top 10 cause of death
•Significant morbidity
•Significant cost
•Is getting more common
What causes it?
•Inflammation
•Coagulopathy
•Blood flow
•Cell failure
•Organ failure
•Death
•Host factors
•Infection factors
•Nosocomial complications VAP/BSI Ventilators
How do you treat it?•Recognition
•Resuscitation = ABCs + Atbx Goal-directed therapy
•Initial Management Customize care Drotrecogin alfa (activated)
•Maintenance Avoid complications• Transfusion• Sedation• Ventilation
You can save lives
•Say Sepsis
•Suspect Sepsis
•Simplify Sepsis Treat it like a medical emergency
Antibiotics Fluids
www.sepsisalliance.org