september 5 , 2013 tyler jones research assistant dept. of geology & geography
DESCRIPTION
Identification and Classification of North Alabama’s Isolated Wetlands Using Geographic Object Based Image Analysis. September 5 , 2013 Tyler Jones Research Assistant Dept. of Geology & Geography Auburn University. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Identification and Classification of North Alabama’s Isolated Wetlands Using Geographic Object Based
Image AnalysisSeptember 5, 2013
Tyler JonesResearch Assistant
Dept. of Geology & GeographyAuburn University
Isolated Wetlands by Ralph TinerU.S. Fish & Wildlife National Wetland Coordinator
Increased interest in recent years due to Supreme Court rulings
There is no uniformly accepted definition of isolated wetlands
With current data and technology the best approach uses geographic isolation for classification (Tiner, 2003)
This project uses Tiner’s narrow interpretation of >40 meters from traditional non-isolated waterbodies
Geographic Object Based Image Analysis (GeOBIA)
Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GeOBIA) is a sub-discipline of GIScience devoted to partitioning remote sensing (RS) imagery into meaningful image-objects, and assessing their characteristics through spatial, spectral and temporal scale. Fundamentally consisting of image segmentation, attribution, and classification (Hay and Castilla, 2006).
Segmentation
Image Segmentation- process of partitioning a digital image into multiple segments (sets of pixels, also known as image primitives). The goal of segmentation is to simplify and/or change the representation of an image into meaningful image objects that are easier to analyze (Shapiro and Stockman, 2004).
Classification
Once created each image object can be identified and classified based on its attributes which the user can define.
For Example: Spatial Extent Linearity Spectral Reflectance Relationship with Image Object Primitives
Classification
Example of classification using shape, size, texture, andheight to classify buildings, trees, impervious surface and grass on the Auburn University campus.
Differences from Traditional Raster Analysis
Pixel based classification methods rely solely on the reflectance values of a given pixel
Without creating meaningful image objects each with its own associated attributes these types of analysis are error prone
GeOBIA allows for hierarchical relationship framework development that give successive levels of image objects an association
MethodologyAnalysis Data:
National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP)1-meter spatial resolution (i.e. 1 pixel =
1meter2)4-band spectral resolution (red, green, blue,
near infrared)Imagery is flown during the 2011 growing
season so vegetation will appear “leaf on”.Repeated every 3 years
MethodologyAnalysis Data:
Soil Survey Geographic Dataset (SSURGO)vector dataset with attributed soil
characteristicsamong other types of soil this dataset contains
location of all known hydric soilscreated by NRCS soil scientists conducting soil surveys
MethodologyIsolation Data:
The National Hydrography Dataset (NHD)vector dataset delineating traditional waters
such as lakes, rivers, and streamsbuilt and maintained by the U.S. Geological
Survey
MethodologyIsolation Data:
Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Digital Flood Rate Insurance Map (DFIRM)vector dataset depicting various hydrological
modelsspecifically the Special Flood Hazard Areas
(commonly known as the “100 year floodplain”)
Methods
Executed using custom algorithms in eCognition Server with parallel processing
Developing decision-tree rulesets Tiling and stitching 714 NAIP DOQQs into
5,712 individual projectsIterative segmentations creating and shaping
meaningful objects Classification based on user defined
thresholds.Measured for geographic isolation to
traditional watersVerification (remote and field) to determine
accuracy
Study AreaArea of Alabama falling north of the 34th
parallelIncludes all or a portion of 17 Alabama
counties
Geographic Isolation
Geographic Isolation
Geographic Isolation
Remote Verification
191 areas identified as geographically isolated were randomly selected and manually inspected using aerial imageryResults showed an overall accuracy of 83.7
percentErrors included rooftops, shadows, and
pavement
Field VerificationField verification was also used to assess
accuracy of classification57 sites were inspected and marked using
TopCon GRS-1 DGPSOverall accuracy of 87.7%
Overall Results
A total of 26,461 areas were identified as geographically isolated wetlands with an overall extent of 49,139.5 acres
Average wetland size: 1.859 acresCounty with highest number of wetlands: Cullman
(4,400)County with lowest number of wetlands: Cherokee
(355)County with most acreage of wetlands: Lawrence
12,668 acresCounty with least acreage of wetlands: Cherokee
346 acres
Future Work
This project’s methodology are being extended to the rest of the state of AlabamaThis should mean a reduction in pre-processing and
methodology construction and increase overall efficiencyAs physiography changes does this effect the accuracy of
these algorithmsFuture wetland mapping projects using GeOBIA should
investigate incorporating airborne LiDAR to increase accuracy
Questions?
Contact Information:
Tyler W. Jones2194A Haley Center
Auburn University, AL [email protected].