session 1 from pilot model to integration in government housing program dwf viet nam
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Disaster Risk Reduction Practitionners Workshop
Bangkok 13-14 November 2013
“More to lose……lessons from Vietnam”
Development Workshop France
2
Vietnam
Disasters in VN
HUE Cecil 1985
HUE Flood 1999
Xangsane 2006
Natural disastersAnnual losses 1% GDP
4
Wutip & Nari 2013
National Strategy for DRR National Target Programme
for Climate Change National Programme on
CBDRM Law on DRR have been prepared, voted, and are implemented.
But more poor,
more vulnerable people,
more affected by natural
disasters!
7
Who can reduce vulnerability ?
Family, local
authorities, &
government
Policy, law, codes, regulations
Land
Funding, savings & loans
Building materials & techniques
Intellectual and physical labour
Hazards & risks
Infrastructure & services Family
needs, wishes, capacity, vision of future
HOUSE
Household level
Housing stock (Data 2009)
Vietnam
Urban
Rural
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
< 19751975-19992000-2009
Vietnam
< 1975
1975-1999
2000-2009
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
PermanentSemi-permanentLess-permanentSimple
People struggle for « better » homes
Despite poverty, over the past 30 years families have incrementally replaced bamboo and thatch houses with more durable structures, building what they believe is a stronger house.
Sadly, few houses have been either well built or completely finished and they cannot resist a strong storm.
Stronger materials, but badly used
Vulnerability is increasing: there is more to lose !
Precious family investment in the home is at serious risk from annual typhoons and floods.
Unneccesary damage could be avoided.
12
Families have had to cope on their own for reconstruction.
• There has been little support and no recognition of the important contribution families can make to damage prevention.
• Rebuilding costs many times more than any support they get from the state.
When disaster strikes…
14
For families, damage prevention is the best option
Preventive strengthening at domestic level needs to made a priority.
It is cheaper, it is easy, and it is socially appropriate
15
BUILDING SAFER & BETTER !
The DWF project objective is to reduce vulnerability
and damage in houses and small infrastructure.
The DWF project helps protect family investment
in shelter and enables investment in
improvements, not repairs.
Making new and existing houses strong and safe
SubsidyLoans
Temporary house
Vulnerable house
Technical support
Stronger houses
19
One message, many media:“prevent flood & storm
damage”
20
10 generic principles of safer construction
Hou
sing
pre
venti
ve re
info
rcem
ent
2000 – 2009Canada, DIPECHO
22
Hue 2008
2011
20106 Provinces
2012, 2013Mekong Delta
Impact & diffusion
Recognition of interest at local level for housing preventive reinforcement Built on practices, training, demonstration, public campaign more than on building codes Working with main actors of house construction: builders / families Pilot demonstration leads to acceptance by local authorities & families Models diffused also through reconstruction programmes
Recognition of interest at national level, through conferences, awards, visits and collaboration for Atlas on Vulnerability.
Su
pp
ort to
the N
ation
al Pro
gram
me
of S
afe Ho
usin
g in
Flo
od
Pro
ne A
reas o
f the M
inistry o
f Co
nstru
ction
DIPECHO 2012-2013
Ministry of Construction - Programme 716
Support to families to build safe house part in high flood areas (>1,5 m)- Subsidy (500$) & preferential loan (500$) & family contribution- Technical advices & supervision- 700 families in pilot phase / 60 000 in extension phase
DWF Technical assistance – with Ministry & Departments of Construction In each province (13) of central Vietnam
- Survey of vulnerability of housing- Atlas of vulnerability and solutions for safe housing in different contexts- Model houses built- Public buildings / evacuation centre built at village level- Provincial workshops with District & Commune technicans- Public campaign / Films (Provincial & National TV)
28
Safe during Wutip typhoon !
Lessons learned (1)
DWF• Duration : DWF 25 years in Vietnam, permanently since 13 years in Thua Thien
Hue (central Vietnam).• From demonstration at Community level, to cooperation at Provincial level, and
advice at National level.• Long process of knowledge, trust and interest.• Method transferred to other countries (Myanmar, Haiti, Indonesia)
Safe housing• Housing is one of sector most affected by natural disasters, but often considered
only for reconstruction after disaster, not in disaster risk reduction.• Safer house = safe (location) + reinforced (structure + walls + roof).• Local architectural traditions / materials and techniques – with key resistant
principles or standards.• Prevention measures (not only just before disaster) have to be supported.• Reinforcing a “common” house costs about 10 - 25% of initial cost.
For families, builders, technicians, decision makers and INGO’s
• Families : Great demand / housing reinforcement stabilises families; but incentive are needed.
• Builders : Difficult to change ways of building (usually saving materials and money) but demonstration and training is a good way to
change their methods.
• Technicians : Construction technicians have some knowledge about impact of
disasters on housing, but often forget it during design and construction supervision process.
• Decision makers: Immediate preparedness is more considered than long term prevention. Face to huge damage to housing and public buildings, policy is changing; the Ministry of Construction is
now considering not only housing but housing in disaster areas.
• INGO’s : Housing is not a priority sector / complicated and costly. Providing only roofing materials for example is not a solution,
without technical advices, and reinforcement of roof structure.
Lessons learned (2)
DW France John NortonB.P. 13 82110 Lauzerte France
DW Viet Nam Guillaume Chantry 21 Ngoc AnhPhu Thuong – Phu Vang Thua Thien Hué Province, Viet [email protected]
Financed by: IFRC (2010, 2013),
European Commission Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department
(ECHO/DIPECHO) (2003 – 2013), Ford Foundation (2008 – 2013)
CIDA IHA (2000 – 2002)
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Wo
rksh
op
Fra
nce