session 2.1

12
2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning Session 2.1. Initial EFSA Primary Data: Key Informants & Sites Selection 1

Upload: bond

Post on 06-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Initial EFSA Primary Data: Key Informants & Sites Selection. Session 2.1. Session Objectives. After this session, participants should be able to: Describe how a list of appropriate key informants is compiled Explain procedures for deciding whether to interview households in an initial EFSA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

Session 2.1.

Initial EFSA Primary Data:

Key Informants & Sites Selection

1

Page 2: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

Session Objectives

After this session, participants should be able to:

• Describe how a list of appropriate key informants is compiled

• Explain procedures for deciding whether to interview households in an initial EFSA

• Explain procedures for selecting primary data collection sites in an initial EFSA

2

Page 3: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

Identify KIs & sites; adapt checklist; visit sites for interviews & observations

The Process

Collect and Compile Secondary Data

Collect and Compile Primary Data using checklist

Conduct Situation Analysis

Conduct Forecast Analysis

Produce Recommendations

Write Initial EFSA report

Develop Work Plan and TORs

3

Page 4: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

How is primary data gathered (in the context of an Initial EFSA)?

• Enumerate primary data collection methods that you know?

• Select methods which can be applied to the context of an initial EFSA.

4

Page 5: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

Key informants (KIs)What do we look for in a good KI?

• Formal role at central or local level

• Knowledgeable about and currently or recently involved in topics of interest to the assessment

• Cultural liaison – can introduce us to others

• Other?

5

Page 6: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

What do we expect to learn from them?

• pre-crisis conditions / how services were normally organized

• degree to which services have been impacted

• most affected locations

• any relief activities already underway or planned

• Who else we should interview, particularly among the affected

Interviewing key informants

6

Page 7: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

Interviewing Households?

no time to conduct formal household surveys

key informants in the field can indicate to us:

– specific families whose situation echoes that of the majority of the population (e.g. farmers)

– families or individuals who present particular needs (e.g. women-headed households, isolated individuals, elderly, children, etc.).

7

Page 8: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

Key InformantWhat type of info do we expect?

What bias should we watch for?

1. Community health worker ? ?

2. Wat/san engineer ? ?3. Local district official ? ?4. Red Crescent

volunteer ? ?

5. Elder from group of disaster displaced ? ?

Exercise in plenary: Info, Bias & Key Informants

8

Page 9: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

Site Selection

From WFP TGS # 6:

“Even if time is limited and even if an Initial EFSA benefits from the results of previous assessments and visits carried out by others, at least a one-day field visit in the affected area(s) is advised, if only to make visual observations.”

9

Page 10: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

Selection Tools

• Secondary data review

• Discussions with KIs in capital city

• Phone calls with KIs in field

• Maps

10

Page 11: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

Factors influencing site selection?

11

Page 12: Session 2.1

2010-05 WFP Initial EFSA Learning

Site Selection Based on secondary data from key informants try to determine if impact is same throughout area and for all population groups. If so, randomly select a small number of sites/villages to visit.

1 23

4 5

67

8 910

11

12

= Highland farmers

= Low land farmers

= Pastoralists

Case 1

10

11

1298

67

4 5

1 23

If impact is not same, map localities where impacts are believed to be different - i.e. include a majority of worst-affected sites and a few (two or three) less-affected areas/groups for verification purposes

Case 2

12