sheet metal part quality improvement through die optimization using autoform
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE
OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM
AIRIC2015
![Page 2: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
OBJECTIVES:
Improvement of simulation accuracy and standardizing of sheet metal forming simulation
Phase transition of die quality improvement from final design to simulation and early CAD surface design
Decreasing of part development time Decreasing of part total cost
![Page 3: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3Causes of project
Need in improvement of AUTOFORM predictions and results
Time and cost waste during manufacturing and sheet metal part development
Poor dimensional accuracy in past projects
![Page 4: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
1. Past method of simulation in AIRIC2. Important effective parameters3. Numerical and simulation investigations4. Experimental and real results 5. Results verifications
1. Optimization methodology2. Optimization of die surface based on successful try-out3. Optimization of die surface based on successful high production
rate
First part
Second part
![Page 5: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Current method of simulation in AIRIC
There is no difference in simulation setup considering type of operation and die size
First part
![Page 6: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Effective ParametersParameter G1 G2 G3 G4 G5
Error tolerance 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.05Max side length 30 30 20 10 10
Global sharp & fillet edge 1 1 1 1 1Global radius 3 3 3 3 3Max radius D D D D D
Max element angle 20 20 20 20 20Max radius penetration 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
Initial element size 2*R min 2*R min 2*R min 2*R min 2*R minInitial number of element
Max refinement level 7 7 6 5 5Max displacement 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.16 0.16
Refinement extension D D D 2.5 2.5Tangential refinement ON ON ON ON ONBoundary penetration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
Stiffness value <10 30 50 100 >100Transient softening D D D D D
Stagnation ratio D D D D DYoung reduction factor D D D D DYoung reduction rate D D D D D
Number of end time step s 6 4 4 4 4End time step 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Drawbead plastification ON ON ON ON ONBinder wrap steps
Crack limit D D D D DTool opening ON ON ON ON ON
Tool penetration to post D D D D D
D: dependent
![Page 7: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Criteria of parameters categorizing
Type of operation Thickness of sheet metal Part complexity
HOLDER BRKT – G5REINF-ANCHORAGE LWR– G3
WHEEL HOUSE-G3
Standard simulation is the current method of simulationModified simulation is simulation based on parameters and values were listed in page 6
![Page 8: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
REINF-ANCHORAGE LWR
![Page 9: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Verification of simulation results
![Page 10: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
FEM correlation OF wheel house
Experimental data:
Standard setting( 3.848mm)
Fine Setting(3.475mm)
User defined setting(2.734 mm)
×
![Page 11: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11STROCKE AT ONCET OF FAILURE (SOF)
SOF: 53 mmMesh size: 4mm
SOF: 54.8 mmStandard setting of Autoform
MAT: SAPH 440Thickness: 2mmTonnage: 65 TN
SOF: 52 mmMesh size: 3mm
SOF:55.764 mmMesh size: 6mm
SIMPLE CUP DRAWING COMPARISON IN ONCET OF FAILURE USING AUTOFORM AND ABAQUS PREDICTIONS
SOF: 40 mmMesh size : 3 mm
![Page 12: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Load - displacement
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
AUTOFORM-ROUGH.AUTOFORM-FINEABAQUS-MESH3AUTOFORM-MESH4AUTOFORM-MESH3
![Page 13: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
COMPARISON OF THICKNESS DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN ABAQUS AND AUTOFORM MODIFIED
![Page 14: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Sample done projects
1. Feasibility phase
2. Die surface design
3. Manufactured die
![Page 15: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
REINF RR HANGER BRKT, LH
DRAWBEADUNKNOWN
Drawbead design and optimization
Effect of drawbead design on failure prevention
Existence of failure on part
Feasibility phase
![Page 16: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
FR DOOR OTR RR VIEW MIRROR MTG PLATE UPR, LH
Existence of failure on part
Subjected fillet design and optimization
Feasibility phase
![Page 17: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
C-PILLAR UPRDie surface design
![Page 18: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Extreme failure all around drawn part
Die surface design
![Page 19: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Defect source
Absence of material flow
Lowest price solution
Drawbead design and optimization
Presence of flow and successful drawing
Die surface design
![Page 20: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
COMPARISON OF FLOW BEFORE AND AFTER OPTIMIZATION
Die surface design
![Page 21: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Die surface design
Improvement part quality
Three different area optimization
Reaching minimum springback amount of 0.75 mm
![Page 22: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
BUMPER CENTERDie surface design
![Page 23: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
SPRING BACKDie surface design
![Page 24: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Problem on part: severe failure & wrinkle on part
Solution: drawbead optimization based on lowest cost in order To eliminate failure and minimized springback
WHEEL HOUSE,RR Manufactured die
![Page 25: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
unknown38%
B12%B2
4%
B39%
B47%B5
4%
B67%
B73%
B82%
B92%
B103%
D14%
D23% D3
7%
D52%
D63%
D72%
formability objecftive function
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 B10 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D70
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Manufactured die
Here there are parameters which affect formability of part
Above parameters are sections of drawbead
![Page 26: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
B-PILLAR-INR-EXTENSION Manufactured die
![Page 27: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Manufactured die
Existence of severe failure on part
![Page 28: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Manufactured die
Optimized areas Successful product
![Page 29: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Distance blocks thicknessCushion pin variable Blank locators (Blank position deviation)
Optimization of die surface based on successful high production rate
![Page 30: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
SPRING BACK DURING TRY-OUT
Cpk = 1Cpk = 1.33Cpk = 0.66
SPRING BACK DURING PRODUCTION
UNKNOWN21%
X-B72%
Y-B5%
X-D1%
Y-D2%
![Page 31: SHEET METAL PART QUALITY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH DIE OPTIMIZATION USING AUTOFORM](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081420/587d2a921a28ab1c2f8b75dd/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Thank you for your attention