ship energy

Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) SEEMP checklist for owners and operators

Document Version 2.0

Lloyd’s Register, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as the ‘Lloyd’s Register Group’. The Lloyd’s Register Group assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd’s Register Group entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.

Lloyd’s Register SEEMP Checklist – version 2.0

© Lloyd’s Register November 2011 i

SEEMP checklist for owners and operators

1. Introduction to this document 1

1.1 Checklist scope and purpose 1

1.2 Checklist structure 1

1.3 How to use this checklist 1

1.4 Completing the checklist 2

2. SEEMP Checklist 3

2.1 Planning, implementation and monitoring 4

2.2 Energy efficiency measures and practices 6


© Lloyd’s Register November 2011 1

SEEMP checklist for owners and operators

1. Introduction to this document

1.1 Checklist scope and purpose

Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) is mandatory for ships over 400 GT from the 1st of January 2013. To assist clients with developing a SEEMP which reflects IMO Guidelines (MEPC.1/Circ. 683) (hereinafter referred to as the Guidelines), Lloyd’s Register has prepared this SEEMP Development Checklist.

In all cases, reference should be made to the Guidelines for specific advice on the technical aspects of the SEEMP.

1.2 Checklist structure

This checklist is structured as follows:

− Planning, implementation and monitoring This section contains non-technical questions in order to ensure that the SEEMP reflects recommendations contained within the Guidelines.

− Energy efficiency measures and practices This section contains a list of typical energy efficiency measures and good practices. It must be noted that the list is not exhaustive nor is it required that the SEEMP includes all of the suggested measures. In many cases, the most effective SEEMPs may contain a small number measures that have the greatest impact on increasing energy efficiency. There is also a risk that too many measures may become unmanageable and difficult to implement.

Energy efficiency measures and practices are separated into the following categories:

− Fuel efficient operations − Optimised ship handling − Hull and propulsion − Machinery and equipment − Cargo handling optimisation − Energy conservation and awareness

1.3 How to use this checklist

This checklist is designed to facilitate the collection of information necessary for preparing a SEEMP. It is based on the requirements found on the Guidelines and uses the same structure and logical order. As some aspects of the SEEMP are directly related to ship personnel while others are more relevant to shore personnel, completing this checklist should be a joint effort. Ultimately, this checklist can be used as an input during the development of the SEEMP.

Please note that this checklist is designed so that it can be filled electronically, and it only allows entering information in specific fields.

The following checklist and notes are intended as a guide to clients, to facilitate the collection of information about the energy efficiency practices and measures onboard the vessel which the SEEMP is developed for.


© Lloyd’s Register November 2011

2

1.4 Completing the checklist

A number of measures and actions are listed under each category. For each of the measures, the following 3 options are available:

− Yes: this means the measure is already implemented on the ship − No: this means the measure is not implemented, but it is applicable on this ship − N/A: this means the measure is not implemented and it is not applicable on this ship

For the measures that the answer was “Yes”, supporting evidence and documentation may be required in line with the Guidelines. Recommendations as to the evidence or documentation that can be suitable to each measure are made, but these recommendations are not prescriptive. For the measures that the answer was “No” or “N/A”, no further evidence is necessary. However, some energy efficiency opportunities may exist and those can be further explored during the development phase for potential inclusion within the SEEMP.

Two additional columns are available for entering the responsible person(s) and additional comments for each measure. Also, at the end of each category there is space to add measures which have not been included. The process of completing this checklist is presented in the following flowchart:

Complete planning, implementation and monitoring section (shore personnel)

Measure implemented onboard this ship?

Add other measures which are not already listed. Provide supporting

evidence where applicable

Use checklist and supporting documentation for the development

of the SEEMP

Provide supporting evidence for each measure (recommendations are made

as to the type of evidence/documentation)

No other action required

N/A

Yes

Potential energy efficiency opportunity, can be further explored for inclusion within the

No



2. SEEMP Checklist

Ship main particulars SEEMP details

Ship Name Date of development

IMO Number From

Hull Number

Implementation period Until

Port of Registry

Ship Type

Planned date of next evaluation

Deadweight Developed by

Gross Tonnage Implemented by



2.1 Planning, implementation and monitoring

1. Planning Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

1.1 Goal setting 1.1.1 Are goals set for increasing the energy

efficiency? Yes,No,N/A* State the goal set (such as the annual fuel consumption or

a specific target of EEOI)

1.1.2 Are you planning on making the goals public?

Yes,No,N/A* Please state how are you planning on publishing your goals

2. Implementation and monitoring Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

2.1 Establishment of implementation system 2.1.1 Is there a responsible person(s) allocated for

each measure? Yes,No,N/A* Fill “responsible person(s)” column for the measures you

answered yes

2.2 Implementation and record keeping 2.2.1 Are you keeping records of the

implementation of each measure where applicable?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide supporting evidence for each measure where records are kept

2.3 Monitoring tools 2.3.1 Are you planning to use the EEOI for

monitoring the energy efficiency of the ship? Yes,No,N/A* State what information you are using for calculating the

EEOI (such as noon reports etc.)

2.3.2 Are you planning to use any other tools instead of / in addition to the EEOI?

Yes,No,N/A* State which tools and information you are using

2.3.3 Are you using an automated vessel performance monitoring system?

Yes,No,N/A* State system type, manufacturer and briefly summarise list of data collected, key performance indicators calculated and main reporting features

2.4 Establishment of a monitoring system 2.4.1 Have you established a monitoring system

including the procedures for collecting data and the assignment of responsible personnel?

Yes,No,N/A* Describe briefly the system established (data collection procedures, performance reporting, responsible personnel etc.)

2.4.2 Is the monitoring carried out by shore staff to the extent that is possible in order to avoid unnecessary burden on ships’ crew?

Yes,No,N/A* Briefly describe the actions taken to minimise burden to ship’s crew (e.g. automated data collection, data processed by shore staff etc.)

2.5 Self evaluation and improvement



2. Implementation and monitoring Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

2.5.1 Are you planning to develop procedures for self evaluation of ship energy management?

Yes,No,N/A* Briefly describe procedures for self evaluation of energy management

2.6 Voluntary reporting / review 2.6.1 Are you planning on publishing the results of

the actions taken in your SEEMP and how they impact the efficiency of your ships in the future?

Yes,No,N/A* Briefly describe plan for voluntary reporting



2.2 Energy efficiency measures and practices

1. Fuel efficient operations Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

1.1 Improved voyage planning 1.1.1 Are you implementing voyage planning? Yes,No,N/A* Provide specific examples and / or extracts of your

operating procedures and manuals that support this statement

1.1.2 Are you using any specialised software for voyage planning purposes?

Yes,No,N/A* State system type, manufacturer, main system characteristics and benefits

1.1.3 Are you using the guidance on IMO resolution A.893(21) for voyage planning?

Yes,No,N/A* State specific elements of the guidance which you apply for optimising energy efficiency

1.2 Weather routeing 1.2.1 Are you implementing weather routeing? Yes,No,N/A* Briefly describe how weather routeing is implemented

1.2.2 Are you using specialised software for weather routeing?


1.3 Just in time 1.3.1 Do your operational procedures and charter

party terms support just in time approaches? Yes,No,N/A* Briefly describe how just in time is supported

1.3.2 Are you implementing just in time arrival where applicable?

Yes,No,N/A* Briefly describe who you are engaging (ports, charterer, agent etc.) and how. Also, any quantifiable benefits using specific examples (e.g. tonnes of fuel saved during last year).

1.4 Speed optimisation 1.4.1 Do the charter party terms allow / encourage

sailing at the optimum speed? Yes,No,N/A* State clauses that allow / encourage speed optimisation

1.4.2 Are you optimising your speed using engine manufacturer’s speed/power consumption curves and propeller curves?

Yes,No,N/A* Give specific examples of speed optimisation. Submit speed/power, consumption, propeller curves marking the optimum point of operation

1.4.3 Are you implementing virtual arrival? Yes,No,N/A* Briefly describe how virtual arrival is implemented and who is involved (charterer, agent, ports etc.) and how. Also, any quantifiable benefits using specific examples (e.g. tonnes of fuel saved during last year) and how the savings were



1. Fuel efficient operations Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

verified)

1.5 Optimised shaft power 1.5.1 Are you aiming at operating at constant

shaft RPM where applicable? Yes,No,N/A* Provide specific examples and / or extracts of your


1.5.2 Are you using automated engine management system to control speed?


Space for additional measures

Provide supporting evidence if applicable

2. Optimised ship handling Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

2.1 Optimum trim 2.1.1 Are the optimum trim conditions for certain

speeds / draughts available onboard? Yes,No,N/A* State in which form are optimum trims available (trim

tables, software etc.) and provide extracts of the trim tables if available

2.1.2 Are you optimising the trim prior to each voyage?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide specific examples and / or extracts of your operating procedures and manuals that support this statement

2.1.3 Are you adjusting to the optimum trim en route whenever applicable?


2.1.4 Are you using any specialised tools / software for trim optimisation?

Yes,No,N/A* State system type, manufacturer, main system characteristics and benefits.

2.2 Optimum ballast 2.2.1 Are you adjusting your ballast to achieve

optimum trim as per 2.1 above? Yes,No,N/A* Provide specific examples and / or extracts of your


2.2.2 Does the Ballast Water Management Plan include the optimum ballast conditions to increase energy efficiency?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide relevant extracts from the BWMP



2. Optimised ship handling Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

2.3 Optimum propeller and propeller inflow considerations

2.3.1 Have you considered improvements to propeller design through retrofit to increase efficiency?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide specific examples of measures considered and their potential benefit. Also, plans for implementation, if known

2.3.2 Have you considered improvements to water inflow such as (but not limited to) fins, nozzles etc.?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide specific examples of measures considered and their potential benefit. Also, plans for implementation, if known

2.4 Optimum use of rudder and autopilot 2.4.1 Does the autopilot system offer optimised

course control (less frequent and smaller corrections)?

Yes,No,N/A* Briefly list autopilot features for optimised course control

2.4.2 Are you implementing optimised course control where applicable during the voyage?


2.4.3 Have you considered retrofitting a more efficient autopilot system (if this is applicable)?

Yes,No,N/A* State system(s) under consideration and their potential benefit. Also, plans for implementation, if known

2.4.4 Have you considered retrofitting an improved rudder blade design optimised for efficiency (e.g. twist-flow rudder)?

Yes,No,N/A* State design(s) and manufacturer(s) considered and their potential benefit. Also, plans for implementation, if known



3. Hull and propeller optimisation Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

3.1 Hull resistance optimisation 3.1.1 Have you assessed the potential benefits of

using advanced anti-fouling coating systems in optimising hull resistance?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide specific examples of coatings considered and their potential benefit. Also, plans for implementation, if known

3.1.2 Are you using advanced hull coating systems?

Yes,No,N/A* State coating manufacturer, type, and any documented savings during the period of application

3.1.3 Do you apply in-water hull cleaning at regular intervals?

Yes,No,N/A* State in-water hull cleaning schedule and provide inspection records if available

3.1.4 Have you assessed the impact of timely full Yes,No,N/A* Briefly state outcome and actions resulting from your



3. Hull and propeller optimisation Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

coating removal and replacement instead of repeated spot blasting and repairs over multiple dry-dockings?

assessment

3.1.5 Are you assessing the hull condition regularly through in-water inspections?

Yes,No,N/A* State in-water hull inspection schedule and provide inspection records if applicable

3.1.6 Are you using a performance monitoring system to evaluate hull condition?


3.2 Propeller management 3.2.1 Do you apply in-water propeller polishing at

regular intervals? Yes,No,N/A* State in-water propeller polishing intervals and provide

inspection records if applicable

3.2.2 Have you assessed the potential benefits of using advanced propeller coating systems as an alternative to regular propeller polishing?

Yes,No,N/A* Briefly state outcome and actions resulting from your assessment

3.2.3 Are you using advanced propeller coating systems?

Yes,No,N/A* State propeller coating manufacturer, and any documented savings during the period of application

3.2.4 Have you considered retrofitting devices for improving propeller efficiency (such as boss fin caps / ducted propeller)?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide specific examples of devices considered and their potential benefit. Also, plans for implementation, if known

3.2.5 Are you using a performance monitoring system to evaluate propeller condition?




4. Machinery and equipment optimisation Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

4.1 Main and auxiliary engine optimisation 4.1.1 Are you measuring and assessing main Yes,No,N/A* Provide an extract of engine performance reports such as




Additional comments

engine performance parameters including (but not limited to) SFOC1, Pmax2, turbocharger parameters, O2 content etc.?

SFOC trends over time

4.1.2 Are you monitoring engine condition using a diesel analyser?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide an extract of diesel analyser outputs and briefly summarise how the outputs have been utilised for optimising the performance and efficiency of the engine

4.1.3 Are you optimising cylinder lubrication oil consumption in line with manufacturer’s recommendations?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide relevant records such as manufacturer recommendations and briefly summarise how the recommendations have been utilised for optimising the performance and efficiency of the engine

4.1.4 Have you considered the use of fuel oil additives that improve combustion and engine performance and efficiency (and in line with MARPOL regulations)?

Yes,No,N/A* State type and supplier of additive and provide any records that demonstrate engine performance and efficiency improvements

4.1.5 Are you consulting engine manufacturer as to optimising engine settings for part-loading?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide relevant records such as manufacturer recommendations and briefly summarise how the recommendations have been utilised for optimising the performance and efficiency of the engine

4.1.6 Are you using a shaft generator? Yes,No,N/A* State generator type, manufacturer, date of installation and typical efficiency gains under normal operation (e.g. x kW corresponding to y% of the auxiliary power demand under sea passage, or it allows to switch off z generators etc.)

4.1.7 Have you assessed the potential benefits of installing a shaft generator as a means of reducing auxiliary engine usage?

Yes,No,N/A* State type(s), and manufacturer(s) considered and their potential benefit (using the examples above). Also, plans for implementation, if known

4.1.8 Are you monitoring auxiliary engine load factors?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide relevant records such as load factors under different types of operation (sea passage, in port). Load factors can be expressed as (number of engine in use) / (total number

1 Specific Fuel Oil Consumption

2 Maximum cylinder pressure




Additional comments

of engines) or (kW in use) / (kW installed) or similar, as long as it is clearly defined

4.1.9 Are you switching off auxiliary engines when applicable instead of running multiple engines at low loads?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide examples and relevant records and list some quantifiable benefits of these actions

4.2 Equipment and systems 4.2.1 Are you monitoring fan/pumping systems

usage and reducing / switching off when applicable?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide examples and relevant records and list some quantifiable benefits of these actions (such as run hours reduction and / or energy efficiency gains, comparison with electric power tables etc.)

4.2.2 Are you using variable control units for engine room fan/pumping systems?

Yes,No,N/A* State date of installation and provide some quantifiable benefits (energy efficiency gains since installation, comparison with sister vessels without variable control units or electric power tables prior to installation if applicable)

4.2.3 Have you assessed the potential benefits of installing variable control units to conserve electrical energy demand?


4.2.4 Are you using frequency controlled equipment where applicable to reduce energy consumption (for example air conditioning compressors)?

Yes,No,N/A* State date of installation and provide some quantifiable benefits (energy efficiency gains since installation, comparison with sister vessels without frequency control units or electric power tables prior to installation if applicable)

4.2.5 Have you assessed the potential benefits of installing frequency converters to conserve electrical energy demand?


4.3 Heat recovery 4.3.1 Are you using a waste heat recovery system

on this ship? Yes,No,N/A* State type, manufacturer, date of installation and typical

efficiency gains under normal operation (e.g. x kW corresponding to y% of the auxiliary power demand under sea passage, or it allows to switch off z generators etc.)

4.3.2 Have you assessed the feasibility of retrofitting a waste heat recovery system to capture thermal energy from the main engine and use it to generate electricity or





Additional comments

drive a steam turbine? 4.3.3 Are you monitoring the exhaust gas

economiser cleanliness by recording the temperature difference and pressure drop?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide relevant records if available (such as inspection records and resulting actions)

4.3.4 Are you performing water washing on the exhaust gas economiser during major repair periods?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide relevant records if available



5. Cargo handling optimisation Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

5.1 Cargo heating and insulation 5.1.1 Do you apply a cargo heating programme to

avoid heating the cargo to discharge temperature throughout the entire voyage?


5.1.2 Do you monitor the condition of the heating insulation at regular intervals?


5.1.3 Are you monitoring the condition of steam traps?


5.2 Other measures for cargo handling optimisation

5.2.1 Have you explored possibilities for optimum cargo handling solutions with port operators?

Yes,No,N/A* Briefly summarise options considered and their potential benefit

5.2.1 Are you optimising the stowage plan of the heated cargo to further reduce heating requirements and therefore energy consumption?




6. Energy conservation and awareness Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible

person (s) Additional comments

6.1 Accommodation energy optimisation



6. Energy conservation and awareness Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

6.1.1 Are you using tube fluorescent lamps (TFLs)? Yes,No,N/A* Provide an estimate of the number of TFLs onboard the ship (or TFLs as a % of total lights) and the resulting energy savings by using these lamps instead of conventional (as an estimate)

6.1.2 Do you consider replacing incandescent bulbs for more energy efficient TFLs?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide an estimate of the potential energy savings by this replacement

6.1.3 Do you have a plan for switching off lights when not in use or using light detectors in areas where lighting is not required at all times?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide specific examples and quantifiable benefits (such as number of hours or kWh saved)

6.1.4 Are you using LCD screens instead of more energy demanding CRT?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide an estimate of the number of LCDs onboard the ship (or LCDs as a % of total screens) and the resulting energy savings by using these screens instead of CRTs (as an estimate)

6.1.5 Do you consider replacing CRT screens for more energy efficient LCDs?

Provide an estimate of the potential energy savings by this replacement

6.2 Use of renewable energy 6.2.1 Have you considered renewable energy

sources such as wind, solar (or photovoltaic) cell technology to the extent that this is possible in order to cover some of the auxiliary energy demand?

Yes,No,N/A* State renewable energy options considered and their potential benefit expressed in terms of % of auxiliary power demand or similar. Also, plans for implementation, if known

6.2.2 Have you evaluated the feasibility of wind assisted propulsion?

Yes,No,N/A* State type(s) and manufacturer(s) considered and their potential benefit (such as % of propulsion power or tonnes of fuel saved per year). Also, plans for implementation, if known

6.3 Use of shore-based power sources when at port (cold ironing)

6.3.1 Is the ship capable of connecting to a shore-based power source?

Yes,No,N/A* State date of installation, scope of compatibility (such as ports that the ship can connect to)

6.3.2 Are you connecting to shore-based power source when this is carbon efficient?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide specific examples and some quantifiable benefits (demonstrating not only financial benefits for the ship but also carbon efficiency). State shore-based electricity source if known



6. Energy conservation and awareness Supporting evidence / documentation Responsible person (s)

Additional comments

6.4 Energy conservation investigation projects 6.4.1 Have you investigated the feasibility of using

existing or new technologies with the objective of improving energy efficiency?

Yes,No,N/A* Briefly summarise technologies considered and their potential benefits. Also, plans for implementation, if known

6.5 Training and awareness 6.5.1 Have you undertaken any relevant energy

efficiency awareness training courses for officers and engineers?

Yes,No,N/A* Provide training records if available, dates and duration of training, who attended and briefly summarise course objectives and benefits from undertaking the course

6.5.2 Are you planning on undertaking such training in the near future?

Yes,No,N/A* Briefly summarise course objectives and intended benefits, who is planning to attend and dates, if known



For more information contact your Lloyd’s Register Group local office. www.lr.org

Lloyd's Register is a trading name of the Lloyd's Register Group of entities. Services are provided by members of the Lloyd's Register Group. For further details, please see our website www.lr.org/entities

ship energy

Documents

auxiliary power demand

main system characteristics

typical efficiency gains

main reporting features

energy efficiency gains

variable control units

provide supporting evidence

resulting energy savings