similarity renormalization group to the nuclear shell model
DESCRIPTION
Similarity Renormalization Group to the nuclear shell model. Koshiroh Tsukiyama. University of Tokyo. ENNEN09 on Feb. 9th 2009 at GSI. Introduction. One of the major goals of nuclear physics. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 1
Similarity Renormalization Group
to the nuclear shell model
Koshiroh Tsukiyama
University of Tokyo
ENNEN09 on Feb. 9th 2009 at GSI
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 2
Introduction
One of the major goals of nuclear physics
To calculate many-body observables quantitatively starting from microscopic NN or NNN interactions.
=>To understand nucleonic interactions from more fundamental degrees of freedom.
We don’t know exactly the nuclear forces.
If nucleonic interactions would be given, it is still NOT easy to calculate many-body observable.
Short-distance repulsion in nuclear forces as well as a strong tensor force.
Highly non-perturbative few- and many-body system
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 3
Effective interactions for Nuclear Many-body System
UCOM
Usually one overcomes this problem by
Introducing the Brueckner G-matrix
=> Re-summation of in-medium pp scattering.
Using RG approach, Vlowk
Using unitary transformations
Unitary transformation
RG equations
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 4
Two Types of RG transformations AV18 3S1
Vlow-k lowers a cutoff in (k, k’)
SRG drives Hamiltonian towards the band-diagonal
Both decouple the high momentum modes, leaving low energy NN
observables unchanged.
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 5
UCOM and SRG and Vlowk
SRG vs. Vlowk
UCOM vs. SRG
S. K. Bogner, R. J. Furnstahl and R .J. PerryPRC75, 061001(R), 2007
H. Hergert and R. RothPRC75, 051001(R), 2007
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 6
Similarity Renormalization Group
Consider a Hamiltonian that we split into diagonal and off-diagonal parts
The SRG provides a prescription to construct the appropriate unitary transformation.
Taking d/ds on both sides then gives
generator of the transformation
We can formally write the unitary transformation as an s-ordered exponential,
Instead of giving one unitary transformation, infinitesimal representations are given in SRG.
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 7
Wegner’s Choice
The idea is to drive a Hamiltonian towards the energy diagonal
Design ηfor different things as s
H(s) driven towards diagonal in k-space
H(s) driven towards block diagonal
is positive semi-definite
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 8
Free Space SRGIn each partial waves with and
Taken from http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~ntg/srg/
For AV18, 3S1
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 9
Free Space SRG
Taken by arXiv:0708.3754v2
Full configuration interaction (FCI) calculation results
As λreduced (s increased) => low-k and high-k decoupled
Convergence is accelerated
But λ-dependent results.
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 10
SRG and Many-body forces
SRG generates A unitary transformed Hamiltonian
Exactly the same value for observable
Only if the entire Hamiltonian is kept.
But many-body interactions are induced in the flow.
In principle up to A-body term is generated.
Bare H also have this structure, for instance, HEFT=H1b+H2b+H3b+H4b+…
NN flow is only approximately unitary
For SRG to be useful for nuclear structure, the point is
Maintaining the hierarchy of many-body forces
OK if the induced terms are of natural size.
Normal-ordering and truncation may be sufficient.
Calculate 3-body sector in the flow . (an advantage of SRG)
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 11
Error estimation in CCSD
3N Interaction and Normal-Ordering
from AV18
Fitted to the data of 3H and 4He
Very small residual 3NF
Normal-ordering can preserve the hierarchy of Many-body forces.
In NCSM, density-dependent two-body terms are the most significant contributions of effective 3NF
Navrátil and Ormand in PRL88, 152502(2002)
Hagen, Papenbrock, Dean, Schwenk.. PRC76, 034302 (2007)
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 12
In-medium SRG
3N, 4N.. forces appear as density dependence in expectation value of a core, s.p.e’s and TBME’s
Choose generator, following Wegner’s idea
Truncate flow equation up to Two-body normal-ordered operators
Rewrite a Hamiltonian taking normal-ordering
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 13
Flow equations of In-medium SRG
Generator is written as
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 14
Flow equations of In-medium SRG
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 15
Flow equations of In-medium SRG
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 16
Flow equations of In-medium SRG
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 17
Perturbative content of SRG
In momentum basis, g is diagonal Flow eqs. can be simplified
Example: homogeneous system like NM
The flow equations at leading order are
Solution for E0 up to 2nd order in the bare coupling.
As s increases, correlation energy is shuffled into non-interacting VEV (HF).
Correlation energy
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 18
Preliminary calculations
Wegner’s choice for the generator
s=0 s
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 19
E0 (4He) flow (solved in small spaces) [N3LO(500MeV)]
0 0.1−30
−20
−10
0SRG, spsdpf−space
s [MeV]2
E0
[MeV
]
=1.5 fm−1
=1.0 fm−1
=2.0 fm−1
We need lager space to make the flow more reliable.
0 0.1
−20
−10
0G−matrix
spsd−shell
spsdpf−shell
s [MeV]2
E0
(4H
e) f
low
ω =-5MeV
VNNG-matrix
Free space SRG= as an input of In-medium SRG
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 20
Observation
0 0.2 0.4−15
−10
−5
0
Off diagonal TBMEs
spsdpfg−shell
Diagonal TBME
s [MeV]2
ab
cd
G−matrix from N3LO(500 MeV)
Flow eqs are solved in
2<0s2|V|0s2>Tz=0,J=0
0 0.2 0.4−15
−10
−5
0
Off diagonal TBMEs
spsdpf−shell
Diagonal TBME
s [MeV]2
ab
cd
G−matrix from N3LO(500 MeV)
Flow eqs are solved in
2<0s2|V|0s2>Tz=0,J=0
0 0.2 0.4−15
−10
−5
0
Off diagonal TBMEs
spsd−shell
Diagonal TBME
s [MeV]2
ab
cd
G−matrix from N3LO(500 MeV)
Flow eqs are solved in
2<0s2|V|0s2>Tz=0,J=0
Energy off-diagonal matrix elements vanish after the flow.
if
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 21
Observations
Energy off-diagonal matrix elements vanish after the flow.
if
There are some cross-shell TBME’s after the flow
Initial value-dependent (due to the small space flow?)
We don’t have to solve cluster problems.
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 22
Summary
We have derived the flow equations for In-medium SRG in M- and J-scheme basis.
Current choice of the generator can get stable flow.
Enegy off-diagonal M.E’s are well suppressed after the flow.
HF covers the dominant part of the correlation energy Shell Model
There are some cross-shell TBME’s after the flow physical meaning
We need large space flow to see the convergence.
direct connection between bare nuclear forces and the nuclear shell model.
3NF in the initial Hamiltonian
Non-perturbative path to the nuclear shell model.
3NF in the normal-ordered Hamiltonian the magnitude of the induced 3NF
In-medium SRG for effective operator Oeff as well as Heff.
09/02/2009 SRG to the shell model, K. Tsukiyama 23
Collaborators
Achim Schwenk (TRIUMF)
Scott Bogner (MSU)
Takaharu Otsuka (Tokyo)