single line tethered glider
DESCRIPTION
Single Line Tethered Glider. Sub-System Level Design Review. Team P14462. Kyle Ball Matthew Douglas William Charlock. Jon Erbelding Paul Grossi Sajid Subhani. Team Introduction. Agenda. Project Description Review Engineering Requirements Review Functional Decomposition Review - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Single Line Tethered Glider
Team P14462Sub-System Level Design Review
Jon ErbeldingPaul Grossi
Sajid Subhani
Kyle BallMatthew DouglasWilliam Charlock
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Team Introduction
Team Member Major
Sajid Subhani Industrial Engineer - Team Lead
Paul Grossi Mechanical Engineer
Matt Douglas Mechanical Engineer
Jon Erbelding Mechanical Engineer
Kyle Ball Mechanical Engineer
Bill Charlock Mechanical Engineer
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Agendaβ Project Description Reviewβ Engineering Requirements Reviewβ Functional Decomposition Reviewβ Top 3 Concepts from Last Reviewβ Concept Feasibility
β Glider Analysis and Feasibilityβ Base Station Analysis and Feasibility
β Project Planningβ Work Breakdown Structure
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Project Description Reviewβ Goal: Design, build, and test a tethered,
small-scale, human-controlled glider.
β Critical Project Objectives:β Maintain maximum tension on the tetherβ Sustaining horizontal and vertical flight
pathsβ Measure and record tether tension and
positionβ Understand the influential parameters for
sustained, tethered, unpowered flight
Glider
Tether
Base Station
Operator w/controller
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Engineering Requirements
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Functional Decomposition
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Review of Top 3 System Concepts
3 Single Axis Load Cell IMU with Single Axis Load Cell 2 Potentiometers with Single Axis Load Cell
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Glider Analysis
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Choosing the Glider
Bixler v1.1 EPO Foam Wing span: 1.4 [m] Chord length: 0.2 [m] Mass: 0.65 [kg] Middle mounted propeller Only EPO Foam
Phoenix 2000 EPO Foam Wing span: 2 [m] Chord length: 0.3 [m] Mass: 0.98 [kg] Front mounted propeller Reinforced
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Choosing the Glider The smaller Bixler glider creates less
tension for a larger operating range Able to operate with an affordable load cell
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Flight Orientation
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Flight Orientation
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Flight Analysis
Wind Speed: ~ 11 mph
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Flight Analysis
Wind Speed: ~ 22 mph
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Flight Analysis
Wind Speed: ~ 44 mph
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Qualitative DOE
Slower wind speed: lower tension
Larger flight path radius: lower tension
Beta angle peaks: ~ 94-95Β°
Tension peaks: ~ 20 [m] tether length
Tension must be less than 5000 [N] (1100 lbs)
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Quantitative DOE Choosing flight configuration
Inputs Maximum allowable tension Observed wind speed
Outputs Beta angle Tether length Flight path radius
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Bridle and Tether Setup Use a tension of 3000 lbs as an overestimate.
Maximum allowable stress for Bixler glider: 30 MPa
Bridle attached at two points on the fuselage causes structural failure at the wing root with 180 MPa
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Proposed Tether and Bridle Design
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Ideal Bridle Location Analysis
Optimum tether location: 0.51 m from root. Optimum tether angle: 54 deg from airplane
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Wing Stress Analysis
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Wing Stress Analysis
Maximum stress: 15 MPa
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Fuselage Stress Analysis
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Tether and Bridle Configuration
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Base Station Analysis and Feasibility
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
2 Potentiometers and Single-Axis Load Cell
Concept 1
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Vertical Rotation
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Static Analysis
β ππ=πππ ππ (πΏπ )βπ πΏπΆππππ (π )βππππ‘βπππππ=0β΄π=
ππππ‘+πππππ+π πΏπΆππππ (π)ππ ππ(πΏπ)
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Dynamic Analysis
β ππ=πππ ππ (πΏπ )βπ πΏπΆππππ (π )βππππ‘βπππππ=πΌπΏπΆπΌβ΄π=
πΌπΏπΆπΌ+ππππ‘+πππππ+π πΏπΆ ππππ (π)ππ ππ(πΏπ)
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Dynamic Analysis Continued
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
3 Single-Axis Load Cellsβ Created 3-D model of the system in SolidWorksβ Works well when the ball joints are kept in
tension as seen in Fig 1.β Ball joints fail when they are put into
compression as seen in Fig 2.
Fig. 1 Fig. 2
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Base Station EquipmentPhidgets 3140_0 β S Type Load
CellBourns 3540S-1-103L Potentiometer
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Initial Base Station Budget ComparisonP14462 Purchase List for 3 Load Cell Base Station
Part Description Unit Price Qty Individual TotalPhidgets 3140_0 - S Type Load Cell 50 3 150.00Ball End Joint Rod 3.78 6 22.68Shipping 0.00
Total Order Price 172.68
P14462 Purchase List for Potentiometer Base Station
Part Description Unit Price Qty Individual TotalPhidgets 3140_0 - S Type Load Cell 50 1 50.00Bourns 3540S-1-103L Potentiometer 20 2 40.00Miniature Aluminum Base-Mounted Stainless Steel Ball BearingsβABEC-3 14.92 2 29.84Flanged Open 1/2 Inch Ball and Roller Bearing 7.61 1 7.61Shipping 0.00
Total Order Price 127.45
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Project Planning
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Project Planning
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Work Breakdown Structure (10-12)β Paul: β Jon: β Kyle: β Matt: β Saj: β Bill:
9/30/2013 Systems Level Design Review P14462
Questions?