site visit report · 2018-06-30 · site visit report the site visit process is a sample on a...
TRANSCRIPT
Site Visit Report
The site visit process is a sample on a particular day of an installation's compliance with some of its licence conditions. Where non-compliance against a particular condition has not been reported, this should not be construed to mean that there is full compliance with that condition of the licence.
Instructions and actions arising from the visit shall be addressed, or where applicable noted, by the licensee in order to ensure compliance, to improve the environmental performance of the installation and to provide clarification on certain issues.
The licensee shall take the actions specified to close out the non-compliances and observations raised in this Site Visit Report.
Licensee
Name of Installation Xerox (Europe) Limited
Licensee Xerox (Europe) Limited
Licence Register No. P0508-02
CRO Number 282298
Site Address Dublin Road, Dundalk, Louth
Site Visit Reference No. SV14362
Report Detail
Issue Date 30/04/2018
Prepared By Victor Olmos
Site Visit Detail
Date Of Inspection 29/03/2018 Announced No
Time In 09:00 Time Out 17:00
Visited by on behalf of the EPA Fitz Scientific
Licensee Personnel and Role See report.
Photo Taken No Samples Taken No Video Taken No
Odour Assessment No
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 1 of 40
Scope
This is a technical report on the monitoring of emissions to atmosphere.
Media
Air.
Site Areas Inspected
See report.
Documents Inspected
See report.
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 2 of 40
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 3 of 40
Xerox (Europe) LimitedXerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
P0508-02CAR18-01
Emissions to AtmosphereReport No:
Report Date:
Fitz Scientific
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co Louth
Phone: +353 41 98 45440
27/04/2018
Environmental Protection Agency
IPPC Licence: P0508-02
Page 1 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 4 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
Report for the Periodic Monitoring of Emissions to Air
Executive Summary
Licence / Permit Number:
Job Quote Number:
P0508-02
EPA18015
Operator Name:
Installation:
Phone:
Contact Name:
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
0429387184
Kevin Marley
Monitoring Dates:
Monitoring Organisation: Fitz Scientific
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Phone: +353 41 98 45440 / Fax: +353 41 98 46171
email: [email protected]
UKAS Registration number 2802
Report Date: 27/04/2018
Signed: ____________________________ Signed: ____________________________
-1
P0508-02IPPC Licence
Report created using QRSys version
P0508-02CAR18-01
29/03/2018
Jason McGuirk
MM14 1320
Level 2
Technician
TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Written By:
MCERTS Reg:
Competency:
Function:
Endorsements:
Aadil Khan
MM11 1120
Level 2
Field Services Manager
TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Approved By:
MCERTS Reg:
Competency:
Function:
Endorsements:
3.9 January 2018
Page 2 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 5 of 40
Contents
1.- Part 1
1.1.- Monitoring Objectives
1.2.- Special Monitoring Requirements
1.3.- Monitoring Results
1.4.- Operational Information
1.5.- Monitoring Deviations
1.6.- Monitoring Procedures and Deviations
2.- Part 2
Appendix 1: General Information
Appendix 2: Monitoring Information
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
Page 3 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 6 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
1.- Part 1
1.1.- Monitoring Objectives
1.2.- Special Monitoring Remarks
All the sampling points were obtainable Yes
All parameters were sampled Yes
The monitoring was carried out at this installation as part of compliance monitoring of an Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Licence requirement. This Air Emissions Monitoring has been carried out by Fitz Scientific on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency. The substances monitored at the emission points are listed below.
Opinions and interpretations expressed in this report are outside the scope of any claimed UKAS accreditation.EPA requirements AG1 (Safety) and AG2 (Monitoring Guidance Note) were applied during the monitoring.
Additional information
A3-18 & A3-19 were both not in operation on the day of sampling. A3-17 was in operation and was sampled instead. A3-21 was monitored as per SSP.
A3-17
Parameter Result
Particulates <0.00018 Kg/h
Volumetric flow 1130.7 m3/h
A3-21
Parameter Result
Particulates <0.005 Kg/h
Volumetric flow 28196.6 m3/h
Page 4 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 7 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
1.3.- Monitoring Results
Analysis information
Emission Point
ReferenceSubstance to be Monitored ELV Result
Uncert (+/-) Units
Date of sampling
Start - End
Times Reference Method Accr.velocity
(m/s)LOD
A3-17 Particulates <0.00018
0.00004 29/03/2018 13:33-14:03
BS EN 13284-1:2002 Yes22.710.00018 Kg/h0.01434 kg/hr
A3-17 Volumetric flow 1130.7 32.4 29/03/2018 13:33-14:03
BS EN 16911-1:2013 Yes22.71n/a m3/h2000 m3/h
A3-21 Particulates <0.005 0.001 29/03/2018 11:28-11:58
BS EN 13284-1:2002 Yes20.950.005 Kg/h0.2151 kg/hr
A3-21 Volumetric flow 28196.6 806.8 29/03/2018 11:28-11:58
BS EN 16911-1:2013 Yes20.95n/a m3/h40000 m3/h
Particulates Fitz Scientific
Volumetric flow Fitz Scientific
Particulates-blank <0.00018
0.00004 29/03/2018 14:10-14:12
BS EN 13284-1:2002 Yes22.710.00018 Kg/hA3-17
Particulates-blank <0.005 0.001 29/03/2018 11:15-11:17
BS EN 13284-1:2002 Yes20.950.005 mg/m3A3-21
Sampling stage carried out as per MCERTS requirementsNo*:
Page 5 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 8 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
Additional information
* The reported uncertainty is based on a standard uncertainty multiplied by a coverage factor k=2, providing a level of confidence of approximately 95%
** Results reported at following Reference Conditions
Reference Conditions
Abatement system and process load
Emission Point Reference Temperature (K) Pressure (KPa) Moisture (%) Oxygen (%)
Monitoring Result Reference Conditions
A3-17 273 101.3 No correctionNo correction
A3-21 273 101.3 No correctionNo correction
Abatement system In Operation Fuel type and LoadLocation
Filters Yes As per system process
A3-21 Nuisance Dust Collection System
Filter Yes As per BatchA3-17 Fuhjin blended toner
Page 6 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 9 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
1.4.- Operating Information
Emission Point Reference Date Process Type
ProcessDuration Substance CEMS PR Units
A3-17 29/03/2018 n/a <0.00018
ParticulatesAir Extraction Batches Kg/h
A3-17 29/03/2018 n/a 1130.7Volumetric flowAir Extraction Batches m3/h
A3-21 29/03/2018 n/a <0.005ParticulatesAir Extraction Continuous Kg/h
A3-21 29/03/2018 n/a 28196.6Volumetric flowAir Extraction Continuous m3/h
* CEMS: Continuous Emission Monitoring System Results
* PR: Periodic Monitoring Results
Page 7 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 10 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
1.5.- Monitoring Deviations
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
A3-17Emission Point ParticulatesParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 8 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 11 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
A3-17Emission Point Volumetric flowParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 9 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 12 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
A3-21Emission Point ParticulatesParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 10 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 13 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
Monitoring carried out as per Standard Methods. No deviations were recorded
Isokinetic conditions were outside the requirements of BS EN 13282-1 section 10.4.
Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.
Emission monitoring point does not have required number of ports as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Figure A2.5).
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >10% ELV to be achieved (for ELV >5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
The ELV is such that the LOD for the analysis does not allow for the requirement of >20% ELV to be achieved (for ELV <5 mg/m3) (MID 13248-1 section 10.6)
Negative flow was found (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 b).
The stack flow direction doesn’t meet the minimum requirement of 15 degrees with regard the axis of the stack. (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 a).
The ratio of highest to lowest local gas velocity is outside (higher than 3:1) of BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 d) requirements.
Emission point does not meet the requirements of BS EN 15259:2007 Section 6.2.1 NOTE 4 and AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (per M1 Annex 1) - The measurement plane is not in a section of duct that is at least 5 hydraulic diameters of straight duct upstream of the sampling plane and 2 hydraulic diameters downtream (5 hydraulic diameters from the top of the stack)
Sampling port size is too small for velocity, temperature and pressure measurements to be carried out as per AG1 section 2.1/2.2 (M1 Annex 1).
Differential pressure lower than 5Pa measured with pitot tube (BS EN 13284-1 section 5.2 c).
SO2 Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 14791:2017 section 6.6.1)
NOx calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 14792:2017 Section 9.4.3)
The blank reading does not meet the required target of <10% of the daily limit value (for ELV >10 mg/m3) (BS EN 12384-1 section 10.6)
A3-21Emission Point Volumetric flowParameter
NOx overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <10% at the daily ELV, or the lowest limit value assigned by the local authorities, expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% at the daily ELV expressed on dry basis before correction to O2 reference concentration as per 7.3 BS EN 15058:2017.
O2 overall uncertainty calculated is outside requirement of <6% of the value expressed on dry basis, or 0.3% expressed as a volume concentration as per Section 8 BS EN 14789:2017
CO calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 15058:2017 Section 9.4.3)
O2 calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (EN 14789:2017 Section 9.4.3)
TVOC calibration drift is higher than 2% of the span value. Results are corrected to drift. (BS EN 12619:2013 Section 6.2.3)
HCl Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS EN 1911:2010 section 5.2.1.2.2)
HF Impinger efficiency is lower than the requirements of 95% total of concentration in the first impinger (BS ISO 15713:2006 section 6.4).
Homogeneity test is required for this stack as per BS EN 15259:2007 but customer did not require it in the Confirmation Form
The measurement values are invalid as the corresponding blank result is greater than the requirement identified in CEN/TS 13649:2014 section 10 (c) (must be <10% of the limit values)
Page 11 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 14 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
Licence / Permit Number:
Job Quote Number:
P0508-02
EPA18015
Operator Name:
Installation:
Phone:
Contact Name:
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Kevin Marley
0429387184
Monitoring Dates:
Monitoring Organisation: Fitz Scientific
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Phone: +353 41 98 45440 / Fax: +353 41 98 46171
email: [email protected]
2.- Part 2
Supporting information
29/03/2018
Laboratory details
Particulates
Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Geoff Fitzpatrick
[email protected] +353 41 98 45440 - ext 2
UKAS 2802Fitz Scientific
Volumetric flow
Address Contact email Phone Acc. Number
Unit 35, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland
Geoff Fitzpatrick
[email protected] +353 41 98 45440 - ext 2
UKAS 2802Fitz Scientific
Page 12 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 15 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
Appendix 1:
Sampling personnel used
Substances Monitored
Equipment Checklist References
As an accredited organisation Fitz scientific have implemented procedures to ensure that the requirements of TPS 63 (UKAS Policy on Deviating Samples) are met with regard to samples taken and tested for chemical analysis. As such all samples, when applicable, have been transported in containers, and in an environment, that meet the relevant standard requirements where applicable
Substance Fitz SOPMethod used for Monitoring
Particulates BS EN 13284-1:2002 101
Volumetric flow BS EN 16911-1:2013 122
Stack: A3-17
EM402
n/a
n/a
Probe1
EM097
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
Volumetric flowParameter:
EM402
Set1
Set A
Probe1
EM097
n/a
EM417 EM3353/EM3388
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
ParticulatesParameter:
Stack: A3-21
EM402
n/a
n/a
Probe1
EM097
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
Volumetric flowParameter:
29/03/2018 Technician Name Position Qualification TEs MCERTS no
Jason McGuirk Team Leader Level 2 TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Adrian Gaughan Team Leader Level 2 TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
MM14 1320
MM14 1287
Page 13 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 16 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
EM402
Set1
Set A
Probe1
EM097
n/a
EM417 EM3345/EM3354
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
TCR
Nozzles
Impingers
Probe
Pitot tube
Weights
Caliper Filters
Horiba
FID
FTIR
Testo Gases
Handheld pumps
Tubes
ParticulatesParameter:
Page 14 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 17 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
Appendix 2:
Monitoring Information
1
4
22.71
90.47
38.48
0.15
1444.5
1130.7
1130.7
273
101.3
0
n/a
n/a
Number of Ports
Number of Points
Average Velocity v'a (m/s)
Average Pressure (KPa)
Average Temperature (ºC)
Stack Diameter (m)
Actual Moisture Flow rate (m3/h)
Moisture Flow rate at STP (m3/h)
Dry Flow rate at STP, Ref O2 (m3/h)
T reference (Deg K)
P reference (KPa)
Isokinetic condition (%)
Oxygen measured (%)
Water vapor (%)
Wet Stack (yes/no) No
Probe Temperature (°C) n/a
Impinger efficiency (%) n/a
Size of Nozzle 5
A3-17Stack Parameter: Volumetric flow, Particulates
Max Flow Rate in Licence (m3/h): 2000
2
4
20.95
91.32
25.61
0.76
34212.3
28196.6
28196.6
273
101.3
-0.3
n/a
n/a
Number of Ports
Number of Points
Average Velocity v'a (m/s)
Average Pressure (KPa)
Average Temperature (ºC)
Stack Diameter (m)
Actual Moisture Flow rate (m3/h)
Moisture Flow rate at STP (m3/h)
Dry Flow rate at STP, Ref O2 (m3/h)
T reference (Deg K)
P reference (KPa)
Isokinetic condition (%)
Oxygen measured (%)
Water vapor (%)
Wet Stack (yes/no) No
Probe Temperature (°C) n/a
Impinger efficiency (%) n/a
Size of Nozzle 5
A3-21Stack Parameter: Volumetric flow, Particulates
Max Flow Rate in Licence (m3/h): 40000
Page 15 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 18 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
Diagram of Sampling Location (not to scale)
X
X X X
A
A3-17
Circular
1
4
ports
points
Point % of Diameter Location (cm) Velocity (m/s) Temperature (ºC)
Traverse Length 0.15 m
Line
1 7.30 1.1 18.36 28.651
2 25.30 3.8 18.12 29.551
3 75.30 11.3 17.79 28.461
4 93.30 14 17.74 31.151
Page 16 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 19 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
X
X
X
X X X
X
X
A
B
A3-21Circular
2
4
ports
points
Point % of Diameter Location (cm) Velocity (m/s) Temperature (ºC)
Traverse Length 0.76 m
Line
1 6.70 5.1 19.33 25.51
2 25.00 19 19.34 25.51
3 75.00 57 19.25 25.451
4 93.40 71 19.34 25.431
1 6.70 5.1 19.25 25.432
2 25.00 19 19.5 25.432
3 75.00 57 19.24 25.412
4 93.40 71 19.29 25.432
Page 17 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 20 of 40
Fitz Scientific
Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth
Xerox (Europe) Limited
Visit No: 1Year: 2018
P0508-02IPPC LicenceP0508-02CAR18-01
Monitoring result calculations and uncertainty calculations
Page 18 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 21 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Volumetric Flowrate Correction Template BS EN 16911-1:2013Company Xerox (Europe) Limited Date of Test 29/03/2018Site Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth Reference No P0508-02Plant Identification A3-21 Operator Id MM07 801Test carried out by Jason McGuirk TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
P0508-02CAR18-01
Stack information:
Stack dimensions
m Stack Area m2 No ports / No pointsSuitable ports
(Y/N)?
Comply with 5 Up / 2 Down?
(Y/N) Pressure kPa Temperature K Moisture % Oxygen %
Circular Stack 0.76 0.453645979 2 Yes YesReference Condition 101.3 273 0 20.9
Rectangular stack 0.00 0.00 0.00 4Stack Conditions 91.3 298.6 0.0 20.90
Actual Value: 0.453645979
PointVelocity m/s (v'a)
Temp degC (ta) Temp K Presssure kPa (Pa)
Flow Rate m3/sec:
Actual Flow rate m3/hr
Moisture Flow rate at STP m3/hr Moisture
Flow rate at STP, Dry m3/hr O2 %
Flow Rate at STP, Dry, Ref O2 m3/hr
1 20.95 25.61 298.61 91 9.5 34212.3 28196.6 0.0 28196.6 20.90 28196.6Volumetric flow 20.95 25.61 298.61 91.320 9.5 34212.3 28196.6 0.0 28196.6 20.90 28196.6Uncertainty 25.61 298.61 91.320 978.9 806.8 0.0 806.8 20.90 806.8
Maximum volumetric flow as per Licence 40000.0 m3/h
Report Number :
Calculation spreadsheet v.52Page 19 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 22 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
v1.4 Oct-16Enter data in orange cells onlyConstantsGas constant 8.314 J/(K.mol)
1990 Pa0.01 Pa
2 % of value0.2 % of range between calibrations
PITOT 0.04 % of rangeSampling probe: Probe1 3.48 Pa
Pitot EM097 Water vapour me 0.00 % relativePitot coefficient, K 0.843 0.61 °C CO content meas 0.00 % relativeExpanded uncertainty (95%, k=2) 0.02 997.12 Pa CO2 content mea 0.00 % relative
0.50 % O2 content measu 0.00 % relative
Duct dimensions Circular RectangularDiameter 0.76 m a mArea 0.5 m2 b m
Area 0.00 m2Uncertainty (%) 0.501315789 Uncertainty (%) 0.00116889
All Pressures should be entered in Pascals, Pa
Measurement Point Atmospheric Pressure, PaStack Pressure, Pa Static Pressure, Pa meas1, Pa meas2, Pa meas3, Pa meas4, Pa meas5, Pa Delta P, Pa Stack Temperature, C
Water Vapour Content, % CO, ppm CO2, % N2, % O2, % dry molecular wt, g/mol stack molecular wt, g/mol
1 99412 91376 327.843 327.84 25.56 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.842 99412 91264 327.18 327.18 25.66 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.843 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.844 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.845 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.846 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.847 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.848 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.849 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.84
10 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8411 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8412 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8413 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8414 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8415 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8416 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8417 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8418 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8419 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8420 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.84
Mean 99412 91320 #DIV/0! 327.51 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 327.51 25.61 0.00 0.0 0.0 79.1 20.9 28.84 28.84
Circular duct Rectangular ductMean velocity 20.95 m/sec Flow rate (stack conditions) 34212 m3/hour 0 m3/hour
Standard uncerta 0.27 m/sec 1.3 % of value Vol. flow rate expanded uncertain 979 m3/hour #DIV/0! m3/hour
Mean density 1.061 kg/m3 Expanded uncert 0.55 m/sec 2.6 % of value Vol. flow rate expanded uncertain 2.9 % of value #DIV/0! % of value
Developed for the STA by David Butterfield & Chris Dimopoulos, NPL
Repeatability of Delta P transducerDrift of Delta P transducerLack of fit of measurement system
Uncertainty calculation for Velocity and Volume Flow Rate Measurement by Pitot tube EN ISO 16911‐1
Characteristics of pressure sensor used for Delta PEnter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Range of Delta P transducerResolution of Delta P transducer
Uncertainty in duct area measurement
Dry gas basis
Uncertainty in stack gas compositionUncertainty in Delta P transducer Enter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Uncertainty in temperature readout systemUncertainty in atmospheric pressure transducer
Enter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Calculation spreadsheet v.52Page 20 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 23 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Velocity associated uncertainties
Pitot Tube CoefficientExpanded uncertainty (95%, k=2) 0.02Standard uncertainty (Dimensionless) 0.01
Table 1
Delta P Standard uncertanites^2 Measurement Point SD of the mean of the DP measurements (Standard uncertainty Delta P)^2 u2(Dpi)Velocity (m/s) Standard uncertainty velocity m/s
Sigma DP See Table 1 1 6.6 7.2 1E‐04 21.0 0.36Resolution uncertainty 0.00 2 6.5 7.2 1E‐04 20.9 0.36Calibration uncertainty 3.02 3Lack of fit 0.21 4Drift 5.28 5
67
Molar Mass 8u(H2O) 0 9(O2)wet 20.9 10u(O2)wet 0.00 11(CO2)wet 0.0 12u(CO2)wet 0.00 13(CO)wet 0.0 14u(CO)wet 0.00 15Oxygen sensitivity 4.00E‐05 16Water sensitivity 1.00E‐04 17CO2 sensitivity 1.60E‐04 18CO sensitivity 4.00E‐08 19
20standard uncertainty 0.000000 kg/mol 0.00 % of value Average 6.55 7.17051272 1E‐04 20.95 0.357128752
Temperaturestandard uncertainty 0.31 K 0.10 % of value
Stack static pressurestandard uncertainty 0.0 Pa #DIV/0! % of value
Stack pressurestandard uncertainty 997.1 Pa 1.09 % of value
Stack gas densitystandard uncertainty 0.0116 kg/m3 1.10 % of value
Standard uncertainty of velocity 0.27 m/sec 1.3 % of value
Expanded uncertainty in velocity 0.55 m/sec 2.6 % of value
Calculation spreadsheet v.52Page 21 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 24 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Volume flow rate associated uncertainties
Circular duct Rectangular ductArea uncertainty 0.01 m2 #DIV/0! m2
Flow rate standard uncertainty 489 m3/h #DIV/0! m3/h
Volume flow rate expanded uncertainty 979 m3/h #DIV/0! m3/h
Volume flow rate expanded uncertainty 2.9 % of value #DIV/0! % of value
Calculation spreadsheet v.52 Page 22 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 25 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Lookup tables
Factor Loading Function
Number of measurments dn2 0.8853 0.5914 0.4865 0.436 0.3957 0.378 0.3519 0.337
10 0.32511 0.31512 0.30715 0.28820 0.26825 0.25430 0.24540 0.22750 0.22260 0.21680 0.206
100 0.199
Calculation spreadsheet v.52 Page 23 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 26 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Swirl Test Record BS EN 16911-1:2013Company Xerox (Europe) Limited Date of Test 29/03/2018Site Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth Reference No P0508-02Plant Identification A3-21 Operator Id MM07 801Test carried out by Jason McGuirk TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Sampling Line APoint Distance to duct (cm) Diff. Pressure (Pa) Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Angle of Swirl
1 5.1 304.545 25.5 19.33 <152 19 304.807 25.5 19.34 <153 57 302.037 25.45 19.25 <154 71 305.005 25.43 19.34 <1556789
101112
Average 304.0985 25.47 19.315 #DIV/0!Min 302.037 25.43 19.25 0Max 305.005 25.5 19.34 0
Sampling Line BPoint Distance to duct (cm) Diff. Pressure (Pa) Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Angle of Swirl
1 5.1 302.181 25.43 19.25 <152 19 309.862 25.43 19.5 <153 57 301.899 25.41 19.24 <154 71 303.439 25.43 19.29 <1556789
101112
Average 304.34525 25.425 19.32 #DIV/0!Min 301.899 25.41 19.24 0Max 309.862 25.43 19.5 0
Calculation spreadsheet v.52 Page 24 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 27 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Particulates BS EN 13284-1:2002Company Xerox (Europe) Limited Date of Test 29/03/2018Site Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth Reference No P0508-02Plant Identification A3-21 Operator Id MM07 801Test carried out by Jason McGuirk TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Report Number: P0508-02CAR18-01
Particulate ConcentrationsLab Results g Certificate Number: Laboratory: Accreditation status: Analytical Method Date of AnalysisFilter #1 0.00006 5790/638/05 Fitz Scientific MCERTS Gravimetry 24/04/2018Rinse 0.00005 5790/638/07 Fitz Scientific MCERTSFilter Blank 0.00006 5790/638/06 Fitz Scientific MCERTSRinse Blank 0.00005 5790/638/08 Fitz Scientific MCERTSLOD Filter 0.00006 n/aLOD Nozzle Wash 0.00005 n/aTotal Particulate g mg Deviation?LOD 0.00011 0.11 Nozzle 5 TRUERun 0.00011 0.11 Isokinetic Ratio -0.3 FALSEBlank 0.00011 0.11 5 up / 2 down (Y/N?) Yes FALSE
No of ports 2 FALSERequirements:
Dry at Gas Meter: (Vg) 0.69870 m3 Blank < 10% ELV TRUEGas Meter Temperature: (tg) 9.72300 282.723 K ELV>5mg/m3 --> LOD<10%ELV FALSEAmbient Pressure Measured:(Pa) 99.41200 KPa ELV<=5mg/m3 --> LOD<20%ELV TRUEGas Volume STP (Vgn) 0.662096993 m3Gas Volume Factor Correction: 0.98220Corrected Volume STP 0.650311667 m3
Resultsmg/Nm3 @ STP Dry Gas
mg/Nm3 @ STP Dry Gas Ref Oxygen Uncertainty mg/m3 kg/h Uncertainty Kg/h
LOD 0.2 0.2 n/a 0.005 n/aRun 0.2 0.2 0.03 0.005 0.001Blank 0.2 0.2 0.03 0.005 0.001
O2 meas = 20.9 %O2 Reference = 20.9 %
Flow Rate as reference conditions 28196.65 m3/hr
Before Blank : After Blank: Before Sample After SampleLeak Test Results: 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.05 cc/min
Calculation spreadsheet v.52
Page 25 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 28 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Run CalculationsUncertainty calculation for EN 13284 Determination of low range mass concentration of dust, Manual Gravimetric Methodv14 Measurement EquationLimit value (ELV) mg.m-3 Reference oxygen 20.9 % by volumeMeasured concentration 0.2 mg.m-3 (at reference conditions)
Measured Quantities Symbol Value Standard uncertainty Units Uncertainty as percentage Uncertainty aRequirement of stdSampled Volume Vm 0.650311667 uVm 0.001 m3 0.15 <=2%Sampled gas Temperature Tm 298.61 uTm 2 k 0.67 <=1%Sampled gas Pressure ρm 91.32 uρm 1 kPa 1.10 <=1%Sampled gas Humidity Hm 0 uHm 1 % by volume 1.00 <=1%Oxygen content O2,m 20.9 uO2,m 0.1 % by volume 0.48 <=5%Mass particulate m 0.11 um 0.00 mg 0.00 #DIV/0! <5% of limit valueNote - Sampled gas humidity, temperature and pressure are values at the gas meterLeak L 0.000922635 % 0.00 <=2%Uncollected Mass UCM 0 mg 0 <=10%(Instack filter - no rinse)Intermediate calculationsFactor for std conds fs 0.82uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u (in units of fs)
ρm 0.009 0.009Hm 0.008 0.008Tm 0.003 0.006ufs 0.013 1.63
Corrected volume V 0.54 uV 0.009 m3 1.64
Factor for O2 correction fc 1.00uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u
O2,m 1.00 0.100Factor for O2 Correction ufc 1.00 0.100 10.00
Parameter Value Units Sensitivity coeff Uncertainty contribution Uncertainty as %Corrected Volume (standard V 0.54 m3 0.32 0.00 mg.m-3 1.64 %Mass m 0.11 mg 1.54 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Factor for O2 Correction fc 1.00 0.17 0.02 mg.m-3 10.00 %Leak L 0.00 mg.m-3 1.00 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Uncollected mass UCM 0.00 mg 1.54 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Combined measurement uncertainty 0.02 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of measured value 20.27 % measured of value expressed with a level of confidence of 95%(Using a coverage factor k=2)
Expanded uncertainty in units of measurement 0.03 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of limit value #DIV/0! % ELV
Requirement in standard is for uncertainty to be < 30% at ELV at standard conditions
sm fVV
m
refc O
Of
,2
,2
2121
cfVmc
3.101273
100)100( m
m
ms T
Hf
Calculation spreadsheet v.52
Page 26 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 29 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Blank CalculationsUncertainty calculation for EN 13284 Determination of low range mass concentration of dust, Manual Gravimetric Methodv14
Measurement EquationLimit value (ELV) 0 mg.m-3 Reference oxygen 20.9 % by volumeMeasured concentration 0.2 mg.m-3 (at reference conditions)
Measured Quantities Symbol Value Standard uncertainty Units Uncertainty as percentage Uncertainty aRequirement of stdSampled Volume Vm 0.650311667 uVm 0.001 m3 0.15 <=2%Sampled gas Temperature Tm 298.61 uTm 2 k 0.67 <=1%Sampled gas Pressure ρm 91.32 uρm 1 kPa 1.10 <=1%Sampled gas Humidity Hm 0 uHm 1 % by volume 1.00 <=1%Oxygen content O2,m 20.9 uO2,m 0.1 % by volume 0.48 <=5%Mass particulate m 0.11 um 0.00 mg 0.00 #DIV/0! <5% of limit valueNote - Sampled gas humidity, temperature and pressure are values at the gas meterLeak L 0.000691976 % 0.00 <=2%Uncollected Mass UCM 0 mg 0 <=10%(Instack filter - no rinse)Intermediate calculationsFactor for std conds fs 0.82uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u (in units of fs)
ρm 0.009 0.009Hm 0.008 0.008Tm 0.003 0.006ufs 0.013 1.63
Corrected volume V 0.54 uV 0.009 m3 1.64
Factor for O2 correction fc 1.00uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u
O2,m 1.00 0.100Factor for O2 Correction ufc 1.00 0.100 10.00
Parameter Value Units Sensitivity coeff Uncertainty contribution Uncertainty as %Corrected Volume (standard V 0.54 m3 0.32 0.00 mg.m-3 1.64 %Mass m 0.11 mg 1.54 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Factor for O2 Correction fc 1.00 0.17 0.02 mg.m-3 10.00 %Leak L 0.00 mg.m-3 1.00 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Uncollected mass UCM 0.00 mg 1.54 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Combined measurement uncertainty 0.02 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of measured value 20.27 % measured of value expressed with a level of confidence of 95%(Using a coverage factor k=2)
Expanded uncertainty in units of measurement 0.03 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of limit value #DIV/0! % ELVNote:
sm fVV
m
refc O
Of
,2
,2
2121
3.101273
100)100( m
m
ms T
Hf
cfVmc
Calculation spreadsheet v.52
Page 27 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 30 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Volumetric Flowrate Correction Template BS EN 16911-1:2013Company Xerox (Europe) Limited Date of Test 29/03/2018Site Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth Reference No P0508-02Plant Identification A3-17 Operator Id MM07 801Test carried out by Jason McGuirk TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
P0508-02CAR18-01
Stack information:
Stack dimensions
m Stack Area m2 No ports / No pointsSuitable ports
(Y/N)?
Comply with 5 Up / 2 Down?
(Y/N) Pressure kPa Temperature K Moisture % Oxygen %
Circular Stack 0.15 0.017671459 1 Yes YesReference Condition 101.3 273 0 20.9
Rectangular stack 0.00 0.00 0.00 4Stack Conditions 90.5 311.5 0.0 20.90
Actual Value: 0.017671459
PointVelocity m/s (v'a)
Temp degC (ta) Temp K Presssure kPa (Pa)
Flow Rate m3/sec:
Actual Flow rate m3/hr
Moisture Flow rate at STP m3/hr Moisture
Flow rate at STP, Dry m3/hr O2 %
Flow Rate at STP, Dry, Ref O2 m3/hr
1 22.71 38.481 311.481 90 0.4 1444.5 1130.7 0.0 1130.7 20.90 1130.7Volumetric flow 22.71 38.48 311.48 90.472 0.4 1444.5 1130.7 0.0 1130.7 20.90 1130.7Uncertainty 38.48 311.48 90.472 41.5 32.4 0.0 32.4 20.90 32.4
Maximum volumetric flow as per Licence 2000.0 m3/h
Report Number :
Calculation spreadsheet v.52Page 28 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 31 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
v1.4 Oct-16Enter data in orange cells onlyConstantsGas constant 8.314 J/(K.mol)
1990 Pa0.01 Pa
2 % of value0.2 % of range between calibrations
PITOT 0.04 % of rangeSampling probe: Probe1 3.85 Pa
Pitot EM097 Water vapour me 0.00 % relativePitot coefficient, K 0.843 0.61 °C CO content meas 0.00 % relativeExpanded uncertainty (95%, k=2) 0.02 996.96 Pa CO2 content mea 0.00 % relative
0.51 % O2 content measu 0.00 % relative
Duct dimensions Circular RectangularDiameter 0.15 m a mArea 0.0 m2 b m
Area 0.00 m2Uncertainty (%) 0.506666667 Uncertainty (%) 0.00116889
All Pressures should be entered in Pascals, Pa
Measurement Point Atmospheric Pressure, PaStack Pressure, Pa Static Pressure, Pa meas1, Pa meas2, Pa meas3, Pa meas4, Pa meas5, Pa Delta P, Pa Stack Temperature, C
Water Vapour Content, % CO, ppm CO2, % N2, % O2, % dry molecular wt, g/mol stack molecular wt, g/mol
1 99396 90472 365.417 365.42 38.48 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.842 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.843 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.844 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.845 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.846 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.847 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.848 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.849 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.84
10 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8411 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8412 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8413 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8414 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8415 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8416 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8417 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8418 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8419 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.8420 0.00 0.00 0 79.1 20.90 28.84 28.84
Mean 99396 90472 #DIV/0! 365.42 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 365.42 38.48 0.00 0.0 0.0 79.1 20.9 28.84 28.84
Circular duct Rectangular ductMean velocity 22.71 m/sec Flow rate (stack conditions) 1444 m3/hour 0 m3/hour
Standard uncerta 0.30 m/sec 1.3 % of value Vol. flow rate expanded uncertain 41 m3/hour #DIV/0! m3/hour
Mean density 1.007 kg/m3 Expanded uncert 0.59 m/sec 2.6 % of value Vol. flow rate expanded uncertain 2.9 % of value #DIV/0! % of value
Developed for the STA by David Butterfield & Chris Dimopoulos, NPL
Repeatability of Delta P transducerDrift of Delta P transducerLack of fit of measurement system
Uncertainty calculation for Velocity and Volume Flow Rate Measurement by Pitot tube EN ISO 16911‐1
Characteristics of pressure sensor used for Delta PEnter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Range of Delta P transducerResolution of Delta P transducer
Uncertainty in duct area measurement
Dry gas basis
Uncertainty in stack gas compositionUncertainty in Delta P transducer Enter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Uncertainty in temperature readout systemUncertainty in atmospheric pressure transducer
Enter uncertainties as (95%,k=2) where relevant
Calculation spreadsheet v.52Page 29 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 32 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Velocity associated uncertainties
Pitot Tube CoefficientExpanded uncertainty (95%, k=2) 0.02Standard uncertainty (Dimensionless) 0.01
Table 1
Delta P Standard uncertanites^2 Measurement Point SD of the mean of the DP measurements (Standard uncertainty Delta P)^2 u2(Dpi)Velocity (m/s) Standard uncertainty velocity m/s
Sigma DP See Table 1 1 7.3 7.9 1E‐04 22.7 0.39Resolution uncertainty 0.00 2Calibration uncertainty 3.71 3Lack of fit 0.21 4Drift 5.28 5
67
Molar Mass 8u(H2O) 0 9(O2)wet 20.9 10u(O2)wet 0.00 11(CO2)wet 0.0 12u(CO2)wet 0.00 13(CO)wet 0.0 14u(CO)wet 0.00 15Oxygen sensitivity 4.00E‐05 16Water sensitivity 1.00E‐04 17CO2 sensitivity 1.60E‐04 18CO sensitivity 4.00E‐08 19
20standard uncertainty 0.000000 kg/mol 0.00 % of value Average 7.31 7.91308013 1E‐04 22.71 0.38569319
Temperaturestandard uncertainty 0.31 K 0.10 % of value
Stack static pressurestandard uncertainty 0.0 Pa #DIV/0! % of value
Stack pressurestandard uncertainty 997.0 Pa 1.10 % of value
Stack gas densitystandard uncertainty 0.0111 kg/m3 1.11 % of value
Standard uncertainty of velocity 0.30 m/sec 1.3 % of value
Expanded uncertainty in velocity 0.59 m/sec 2.6 % of value
Calculation spreadsheet v.52Page 30 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 33 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Volume flow rate associated uncertainties
Circular duct Rectangular ductArea uncertainty 0.01 m2 #DIV/0! m2
Flow rate standard uncertainty 21 m3/h #DIV/0! m3/h
Volume flow rate expanded uncertainty 41 m3/h #DIV/0! m3/h
Volume flow rate expanded uncertainty 2.9 % of value #DIV/0! % of value
Calculation spreadsheet v.52 Page 31 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 34 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Lookup tables
Factor Loading Function
Number of measurments dn2 0.8853 0.5914 0.4865 0.436 0.3957 0.378 0.3519 0.337
10 0.32511 0.31512 0.30715 0.28820 0.26825 0.25430 0.24540 0.22750 0.22260 0.21680 0.206
100 0.199
Calculation spreadsheet v.52 Page 32 of 36Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 35 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Swirl Test Record BS EN 16911-1:2013Company Xerox (Europe) Limited Date of Test 29/03/2018Site Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth Reference No P0508-02Plant Identification A3-17 Operator Id MM07 801Test carried out by Jason McGuirk TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Sampling Line APoint Distance to duct (cm) Diff. Pressure (Pa) Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Angle of Swirl
1 1.1 272.07 28.65 18.36 <152 3.8 264.36 29.55 18.12 <153 11.3 255.72 28.46 17.79 <154 14 251.92 31.15 17.74 <1556789
101112
Average 261.01 29.45 18.00 #DIV/0!Min 251.92 28.46 17.74 0Max 272.07 31.15 18.36 0
Sampling Line BPoint Distance to duct (m) Diff. Pressure (Pa) Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Angle of Swirl
123456789
101112
Average #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!Min 0 0 0 0Max 0 0 0 0
Calculation spreadsheet v.52 Page 33 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 36 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Particulates BS EN 13284-1:2002Company Xerox (Europe) Limited Date of Test 29/03/2018Site Xerox Technology Park, Dublin Road, Dundalk, Co Louth Reference No P0508-02Plant Identification A3-17 Operator Id MM07 801Test carried out by Jason McGuirk TE's TE1, TE2, TE3, TE4
Report Number: P0508-02CAR18-01
Particulate ConcentrationsLab Results g Certificate Number: Laboratory: Accreditation status: Analytical Method Date of AnalysisFilter #1 0.00006 5790/638/01 Fitz Scientific MCERTS Gravimetry 24/04/2018Rinse 0.00005 5790/638/03 Fitz Scientific MCERTSFilter Blank 0.00006 5790/638/02 Fitz Scientific MCERTSRinse Blank 0.00005 5790/638/04 Fitz Scientific MCERTSLOD Filter 0.00006 n/aLOD Nozzle Wash 0.00005 n/aTotal Particulate g mg Deviation?LOD 0.00011 0.11 Nozzle 5 TRUERun 0.00011 0.11 Isokinetic Ratio 0 FALSEBlank 0.00011 0.11 5 up / 2 down (Y/N?) Yes FALSE
No of ports 1 TRUERequirements:
Dry at Gas Meter: (Vg) 0.74010 m3 Blank < 10% ELV TRUEGas Meter Temperature: (tg) 11.85500 284.855 K ELV>5mg/m3 --> LOD<10%ELV FALSEAmbient Pressure Measured:(Pa) 99.39600 KPa ELV<=5mg/m3 --> LOD<20%ELV TRUEGas Volume STP (Vgn) 0.69596703 m3Gas Volume Factor Correction: 0.98110Corrected Volume STP 0.682813253 m3
Resultsmg/Nm3 @ STP Dry Gas
mg/Nm3 @ STP Dry Gas Ref Oxygen Uncertainty mg/m3 kg/h Uncertainty Kg/h
LOD 0.2 0.2 n/a 0.00018 n/aRun 0.2 0.2 0.03 0.00018 0.00004Blank 0.2 0.2 0.03 0.00018 0.00004
O2 meas = 20.9 %O2 Reference = 20.9 %
Flow Rate as reference conditions 1130.69 m3/hr
Before Blank : After Blank: Before Sample After SampleLeak Test Results: 0.1 0 0 0.05 cc/min
Calculation spreadsheet v.52
Page 34 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 37 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Run CalculationsUncertainty calculation for EN 13284 Determination of low range mass concentration of dust, Manual Gravimetric Methodv14 Measurement EquationLimit value (ELV) mg.m-3 Reference oxygen 20.9 % by volumeMeasured concentration 0.2 mg.m-3 (at reference conditions)
Measured Quantities Symbol Value Standard uncertainty Units Uncertainty as percentage Uncertainty aRequirement of stdSampled Volume Vm 0.682813253 uVm 0.001 m3 0.15 <=2%Sampled gas Temperature Tm 311.481 uTm 2 k 0.64 <=1%Sampled gas Pressure ρm 90.472 uρm 1 kPa 1.11 <=1%Sampled gas Humidity Hm 0 uHm 1 % by volume 1.00 <=1%Oxygen content O2,m 20.9 uO2,m 0.1 % by volume 0.48 <=5%Mass particulate m 0.11 um 0.00 mg 0.00 #DIV/0! <5% of limit valueNote - Sampled gas humidity, temperature and pressure are values at the gas meterLeak L 0.000219679 % 0.00 <=2%Uncollected Mass UCM 0 mg 0 <=10%(Instack filter - no rinse)Intermediate calculationsFactor for std conds fs 0.78uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u (in units of fs)
ρm 0.009 0.009Hm 0.008 0.008Tm 0.003 0.005ufs 0.013 1.62
Corrected volume V 0.53 uV 0.009 m3 1.63
Factor for O2 correction fc 1.00uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u
O2,m 1.00 0.100Factor for O2 Correction ufc 1.00 0.100 10.00
Parameter Value Units Sensitivity coeff Uncertainty contribution Uncertainty as %Corrected Volume (standard V 0.53 m3 0.30 0.00 mg.m-3 1.63 %Mass m 0.11 mg 1.46 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Factor for O2 Correction fc 1.00 0.16 0.02 mg.m-3 10.00 %Leak L 0.00 mg.m-3 1.00 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Uncollected mass UCM 0.00 mg 1.46 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Combined measurement uncertainty 0.02 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of measured value 20.27 % measured of value expressed with a level of confidence of 95%(Using a coverage factor k=2)
Expanded uncertainty in units of measurement 0.03 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of limit value #DIV/0! % ELV
Requirement in standard is for uncertainty to be < 30% at ELV at standard conditions
sm fVV
m
refc O
Of
,2
,2
2121
cfVmc
3.101273
100)100( m
m
ms T
Hf
Calculation spreadsheet v.52
Page 35 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 38 of 40
Fitz ScientificP0508-02CAR18-01Yar: 2018 Visit no: 1_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Xerox (Europe) LimitedIPPC Licence P0508-02
Blank CalculationsUncertainty calculation for EN 13284 Determination of low range mass concentration of dust, Manual Gravimetric Methodv14
Measurement EquationLimit value (ELV) 0 mg.m-3 Reference oxygen 20.9 % by volumeMeasured concentration 0.2 mg.m-3 (at reference conditions)
Measured Quantities Symbol Value Standard uncertainty Units Uncertainty as percentage Uncertainty aRequirement of stdSampled Volume Vm 0.682813253 uVm 0.001 m3 0.15 <=2%Sampled gas Temperature Tm 311.481 uTm 2 k 0.64 <=1%Sampled gas Pressure ρm 90.472 uρm 1 kPa 1.11 <=1%Sampled gas Humidity Hm 0 uHm 1 % by volume 1.00 <=1%Oxygen content O2,m 20.9 uO2,m 0.1 % by volume 0.48 <=5%Mass particulate m 0.11 um 0.00 mg 0.00 #DIV/0! <5% of limit valueNote - Sampled gas humidity, temperature and pressure are values at the gas meterLeak L 0.000439359 % 0.00 <=2%Uncollected Mass UCM 0 mg 0 <=10%(Instack filter - no rinse)Intermediate calculationsFactor for std conds fs 0.78uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u (in units of fs)
ρm 0.009 0.009Hm 0.008 0.008Tm 0.003 0.005ufs 0.013 1.62
Corrected volume V 0.53 uV 0.009 m3 1.63
Factor for O2 correction fc 1.00uncertainty components symbol sensitivity coeff u
O2,m 1.00 0.100Factor for O2 Correction ufc 1.00 0.100 10.00
Parameter Value Units Sensitivity coeff Uncertainty contribution Uncertainty as %Corrected Volume (standard V 0.53 m3 0.30 0.00 mg.m-3 1.63 %Mass m 0.11 mg 1.46 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Factor for O2 Correction fc 1.00 0.16 0.02 mg.m-3 10.00 %Leak L 0.00 mg.m-3 1.00 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Uncollected mass UCM 0.00 mg 1.46 0.00 mg.m-3 0.00 %Combined measurement uncertainty 0.02 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of measured value 20.27 % measured of value expressed with a level of confidence of 95%(Using a coverage factor k=2)
Expanded uncertainty in units of measurement 0.03 mg.m-3
Expanded uncertainty as percentage of limit value #DIV/0! % ELVNote:
sm fVV
m
refc O
Of
,2
,2
2121
3.101273
100)100( m
m
ms T
Hf
cfVmc
Calculation spreadsheet v.52
Page 36 of 36
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 39 of 40
Summary
See report.
FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS
You are required to complete the instructions and actions, as outlined in this report, within the specified timeframe. Where required, you shall respond to actions specified in Compliance Investigations within the required timeframe.The licensee shall maintain documentary evidence, for review by the EPA, that the prescribed corrective actions were completed within the required timeframe.
(i) Compliance Investigations
You are not required to respond directly to items contained in this EPA site visit report; where an issue requires a direct response, the EPA will generate a Compliance Investigation through the EDEN system. You will receive notification when a Compliance Investigation instruction or action is generated.
(ii) Publication of reports and licensee response.
Please note that this Site Visit Report will be made available for public viewing via the EPA’s Licence Enforcement Access Portal within one day of the issue date and will be published on the Licence Details Page of the EPA’s website, www.epa.ie, that relates to your licence 60 calendar days after the issue date.
You may if you choose submit, within 45 calendar days of the issue date of this Site Visit Report, a Licensee Public Response that will be published alongside the Site Visit Report. This Response, should you wish to avail of it, provides you with an opportunity to inform the public about how you are implementing the actions set out in the report, activities underway, timescales and target completion dates. Please be aware that the content of your Licensee Public Response must be factual and should not breach the EPAs stated online publication standards.
If you wish to submit a Licensee Public Response to an EPA Site Visit Report, you should do this by clicking on the ‘Make a Response’ link on the Site Visits page in EDEN. A .pdf document containing your response can be attached and submitted from here.
(iii) Response to Site visit report
Where you do wish to respond directly to a site visit report, you should do this by generating a ‘Licensee Return’ of the type ‘Site Updates/Notifications’ and the sub-type ‘Response to EPA Report’ in EDEN.
Please note that you are required to comply with the conditions of your licence at all times, and where noncompliance occurs you must restore compliance within the shortest possible time. These actions will be verified during subsequent EPA visits.
Please quote the above Inspection Reference Number in any future correspondence in relation to this Report.
Site Visit Report - SV14362 - Xerox (Europe) Limited Page 40 of 40