smart specialisation the government perspective - cardiff university - 28 june 2012
TRANSCRIPT
SMART SPECIALISATION THE GOVERNMENT
PERSPECTIVE
- Cardiff University - 28 June 2012
BACKDROP - CHALLENGING TIMES Economic landscape : recession &
Eurozone crisis EU budget focus on driving high end
growth & maximising impact Concentration of investment on top
drivers of growth UK National Reform Plan targets Stronger performance management &
accountability More flexibility to align EU funds
(regional, social, rural and fisheries)
EU ‘COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK’ INVESTMENT THEMES
1. Innovation and R&D2. ICT: Improving access; quality and usage3. SMEs: Improving competitiveness, incl. in the
agricultural and aquaculture sectors 4. Shift to low carbon economy5. Climate change adaptation and risk management6. Environmental protection & resource efficiency7. Sustainable transport and unblocking key networks8. Employment and labour mobility9. Social inclusion and fighting poverty10. Education, skills and lifelong learning11. Improving institutional capacity for efficient
public administration
UK CHALLENGES FOR STRUCTURAL FUNDS
Increasing R&D spend & ‘localising’ national investment plans (TSB)
Improving access to finance for SMEs More renewable energy use NEETS / youth unemployment Higher level skills Financing through ‘financial
instruments’ (more loans / fewer grants)
‘LESS DEVELOPED’ REGIONS 2014-2020
GDP/head below 75% EU27 average
75%-85% EU co-financing available for wider range of activities
Safety net” of 2/3 of previous allocation for regions moving ‘up’ and out of this category
At least 25% spend must be from European Social Fund
Likely to be West Wales and the Valleys + Cornwall and Scilly Isles
‘TRANSITION’ REGIONS 2014-2020GDP/head between 75% and 90% of EU27
average60% EU co-financingSafety net” of 2/3 of previous allocation for
regions moving ‘upwards’ into this category
At least 40% spend must be from European Social Fund, of which 70% of each programme must focus on only 4 priorities, with 20% earmarked for tackling social exclusion at national level
80% ERDF to focus on only 3 priorities Likely to include :
– Devon– Lincolnshire– East Yorkshire & N. Lincolnshire– Shropshire & Staffordshire– South Yorkshire – Merseyside – Lancashire– Tees Valley & Durham– Highlands & Islands – Cumbria – Northern Ireland
MORE DEVELOPED’ REGIONS 2014-2020
GDP/head more than 90% EU27 average
50% EU co-financing
At least 52% spend must be from European Social Fund, of which 80% of each programme must focus on only 4 priorities
At least 20% ESF to focus on social exclusion at national level
80% ERDF to focus on only 3 priorities:InnovationSME competitivenessLow carbon and energy efficiency (at least 20%)
SMART SPECIALISATION: WHAT WE NEED VS WHAT WE WANT
UK strategy for stimulating R&D excellence Proven track record of world beating
innovation Smart specialisation as a ‘precondition’ for
receiving UK ERDF....does not apply...but We want....Locally transparent and locally
engaged innovation / R&D investment decisions.
We want....National innovation investment woven into local investment plans
NATIONAL LEVERS: TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY
Technology Strategy Board (UK national innovation agency) works with top companies in R&D to:Accelerate ‘the journey between concept and commercialisation’Connect the innovation landscapeTurn Government procurement into innovation driver & business opportunity Invest in priority areas based on potential to generate sustainable UK economic growth
TSB DELIVERS THROUGH....
Technology & Innovation (Catapult) Centres
Demonstrator Projects : Innovation Platforms (eg. Low Carbon Vehicles)
Support for networking & collaboration (incl. Knowledge Transfer Networks)
Support for SMEs (Grant for R&D, Knowledge Transfer Partnerships, Eurostars)
Procurement : driving innovation through government procurement
LOCAL LEVERS?
Universities Private sector R&D Social / business innovation?
? SMART SPECIALISATION: How do we deliver local impact from a partnership between national & local investment in innovation ?
Need to avoid cathedrals in the desert + sub-optimal fragmentation
KEY QUESTIONS What will shift the economic game?
How will the difference be measured?
How much & when?
Fuzzy boundaries?: o Different partnerships for different
issues? o Different geographies for different
issues?
Leadership? Governance?