social safeguards and involuntary resettlement monitoring ... · rukun tetangga, neighbourhood vthe...

i

Social Safeguards and Involuntary Resettlement Monitoring Report

Second Semi-Annual ReportJanuary 2019

Project Number: 43251-025Loan Number: 3123/8280-INOJuly-December 2018

INDONESIA: Metropolitan Sanitation Management Investment Project (MSMIP)

Prepared by the Central Project Management Unit of the Directorate General of Human Settlements, Ministry of Public Works and Housing for the Government of Indonesia and the Asian Development Bank.

fernando - Part 3

LARP Implementation Report

Indonesia Australia Partnership for Infrastructure (KIAT) 11

Annex 2



Annex 3



Public Consultation Meeting start of implementation of LARP



Interview of AHs for update of the SES



Annex 4

Provision of transport for moving

Moving of the AHs

Wancik House Moved in 2012



Tobing House moved in 2012 (note the electricity and water connection)

Abdul Karim House moving on 9 October, 2017

Post-Relocation

Socio-Economic

Survey Results

March 2018

Prepared for KIAT

July 2018

Appendix 18. Post-Relocation SES Results March 2018

Post-Relocation Socio-Economic Survey Results

March 2018

Indonesia Australia Partnership for Infrastructure (KIAT)

Contact Information

Robert Anscombe

Contractor Representative

Cardno

International Financial Centre (IFC)

Tower 2, Level 18

Jl. Jendral Sudirman Kav. 22-23

Jakarta 12920 Indonesia

Phone: +62 21 8086 9800

Email: [email protected]

Document History

Version Effective Date Description of Revision Prepared by Reviewed by

0 11/05/2018 Draft Dwi Setianingsih / Wolfgang

Clauss

Ron van de Kuilen

1 27/05/2018 Draft Final Wolfgang Clauss / Ati Hartati Ron van de Kuilen

2 17/07/2018 Draft Final Herry Widjanarko Ruth Waluyan / Ron van de

Kuilen

© Cardno. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be

used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on

any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno.

This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with

the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability

whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of

this document.

Post-Relocation Socio-Economic Update Survey Results

March 2018

Indonesia Australia Partnership for Infrastructure (KIAT) ii

Contents

Acronyms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................... iv

Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 1

1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 3

1.1 The Project ............................................................................................................................. 3

1.2 Background of the Post-Relocation Socio-Economic Survey .................................................. 3

1.3 Methodology and the Implementation of Data Collection .................................................... 3

1.4 Report Structure .................................................................................................................... 4

2 Socio-Economic Profile of the AHs ..................................................................... 4

2.1 Background Context the Resettlement ............................................................................... 4

2.2 Demographic Profile .............................................................................................................. 7

2.3 Education ............................................................................................................................... 8

2.4 Occupations ........................................................................................................................... 9

2.5 Monthly Incomes ................................................................................................................. 10

2.6 Vulnerable Households ........................................................................................................ 12

2.7 Sanitation Conditions ........................................................................................................... 12

2.8 Access to Social Services ...................................................................................................... 13

2.9 Access to Places of Work ...................................................................................................... 14

2.10 Compensation Money Usage ............................................................................................... 14

2.11 Current Condition of Impacted HHs ..................................................................................... 16

2.12 Opinion/Suggestions about Project Implementation ........................................................... 18

3 Conclusions........................................................................................................ 19

4 Follow-up Action and Recommendation .......................................................... 20

5 Post-Relocation SES - Photo documentation ................................................... 21


March 2018

Indonesia Australia Partnership for Infrastructure (KIAT) iii

List of Tables

Table 1: present Residence Status March 2018 ........................................................................... 5

Table 2: Age and Gender Distribution of APs (updated status May 2018) ........................................... 8

Table 3: Current Occupations of Household Members (updated status May 2018) ............................ 9

Table 4: Monthly Family and Per-Capita Income (updated status March 2018) ................................ 11

Table 5: Usage of Compensation Money ........................................................................................... 14

Table 6: Current Condition of AHs .................................................................................................... 16

Table 7: Opinion/Suggestions about the Implementation .................................................. 18

List of Figures

Figure 1 Number of Family Member Living in the Same House within AHs .............................. 7

Figure 2 Affected Person Composition based on Age Distribution ............................................ 7

Figure 3 Monthly Family Income, Expenditures and Per Capita .............................................. 10

Figure 4 Source of Drinking Water ........................................................................................... 13

Figure 5 Source of Domestic Water Supply .............................................................................. 13

Figure 6 Post-Relocation Sanitation Facility ............................................................................. 13

Figure 7 Working Distance ....................................................................................................... 14

Figure 8 Usage of Resettlement Compensation Money by Affected Households ................... 16

Figure 9 Opinion and Suggestions Regarding Implementation of Land Acquisition and

Resettlement .............................................................................................................. 18

Annexes

I. Annex 1: English translation of the SES questionnaire ......................................................................... I-1

II. Annex 2: Updated Profiles of Individual AHs (March 2018) ................................................................. II-1


March 2018

Indonesia Australia Partnership for Infrastructure (KIAT) iv

ADB Asian Development Bank

AF Affected Family

AH Affected Household

AP Affected Person

BAPPEDA Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah

Local Government Development Planning Boar

BOS Bantuan Operasional Sekolah, school operational assistance program

CMC Construction Management Consultant

HH Household

LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan

LPMU Local Project Management Unit

PCSP Palembang City Sewerage Project

PDAM Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (the municipal water supply company)

PKH Program Keluarga Harapan, Family Hope Program

PLN Perusahaan Listrik Negara, state-owned electricity utility

POSYANDU Pusat Pelayanan Terpadu, integrated service post

PUSKESMAS Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat, community health centre

PWD People with disability

RT Rukun Tetangga, neighbourhood the lowest administrative division

RW Rukun Warga, community association the division of regions under the kelurahan

SES Socio-Economic Survey

TV Television

WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant


March 2018


Executive Summary

The Post-Relocation Socio-Economic Survey in March 2018 was conducted to obtain the actual socio-

economic conditions of households affected by the Wastewater Treatment Plant construction of

Palembang City Sewerage Project. The census collected was inclusive information of family members

living within the main affected households to be compared with the previous latest SES data in

September 2017 (semi-annual updating). The data collected comprises: (i) basic information of the

heads of AHs, (ii) socio-economic profile of AHs, (iii) access to public/social facilities, (iv) access to

the working places, (v) current conditions of impacted HH, and opinions/suggestions for project

implementation.

Data collection was carried out by members of the CMC team in March 2018 by face-to-face

interviews with heads of all affected households, or by using a reliable representative in cases where

the household head could not be reached. The SES covered 17 house owners or the main head of

household (HH) family members representing his/her deceased father/mother affected by the

WWTP construction.

According to the September SES results, the total number of affected families was 28 within 17 main

HHs. During the March 2018 SES, the total number of interviewed families was 26 families within 17

affected main HHs two families were no longer covered by the SES survey since they were living in

a separate house and formed separate households. Four AHs are female head of households. The

total number of family members is 95 people. From the total of 95 household members, 58 people

(61.1%) are in the labour force (age above 15 years and below 60 years). Six people are categorized

as elderly (according to the Statistics Agency/BPS categorization), i.e. age over 60 years. There are

two people with disabilities (PWD) within AHs, one female is suffering from epilepsy and one female

has a speech impairment.

At the time of the September 2017 SES, eight of AHs were still staying at their own residences at the

WWTP location site. They moved to their new residences in October 2017. Only two of the AH

moved to their own land about 7-10 km from the WWTP location; 1 AH has arranged to rent a house

close to the WWTP. The results show that 9 AHs (out of 17) had moved to the same location close to

the WWTP site (public/rayon land). The results also show that families have a strong connection to

their previous residences where some lived for more than 30 years. Two families are residing at

places near the WWTP site. The land bought by 9 AHs close to WWTP location is owned by the

Provincial Government (public land that is ), but the majority of families has used

the land as vegetable gardens for over 30 years and a proportion has used the land for residential

purposes for several years. Presently, the residents have legal PDAM and PLN connections, official

administrative RT/RW numbers, and also pay for waste collection to the kelurahan/kecamatan. At a

minimum, the use of the land for housing is therefore condoned by the local government.

concluded that 6 family incomes have decreased, 7 family incomes have increased, and 3 family

incomes are about the same as before. The decreasing family monthly income was mainly due to job

losses of family members, change of occupations, or new, or from additional members of the family.

Meanwhile, increasing income was mainly due to family members starting a new small business.

Co 480,375 per

capita per month in 2017, the SES data show that four AHs were below, or only slightly above, the

poverty threshold. The SES survey identified four AHs as vulnerable according to the ADB Safeguards

Policy Statement.

Sanitation conditions can be categorized as improved compared to the previous settlement. Twelve

main AHs are customers of the municipal water supply company (PDAM), one AH receives piped

water supply from the nearby PUSRI fertilizer factory, and no AH were using river as their source of


March 2018


water supply. All AHs have a toilet or shared toilet with their house, two of the AHs were

without a septic tank.

Most AHs used a major part or all of their compensation money for housing purposes, i.e., to build a

new house, buy materials for renovating or extending an existing house or pay rent for a temporary

residence. Paying school fees ranks second. Five AHs also invested part of their money for business

purposes, i.e., buying a motorcycle to be used for on-call transportation (ojek) or capital for starting

a small business. Some AHs also gave part of their compensation money to relatives and/or made

donations for religious purposes.

The majority (eleven) of the main impacted AHs rated their current condition as better off compared

to their previous conditions; four of the impacted HHs rated their current conditions as almost the

same as before, and three rated their conditions to be worse off. AHs, that stated to be better off

explained that they now feel more secure and have a better house. AHs, that rated their present

conditions as same as before explained that they had limited choices to move to a better place with

limited money. It was noted that in the case of the AHs that feel worse off, their condition is not

caused by the need to relocate but due to loss of employment, which is not related to the project.

Nevertheless, all AHs hope to be given the opportunity for family members to be employed during

the construction activities of the project. Six AHs also hope to be given access to a soft loan for

expanding their business.

A considerable number of AHs stated that the time given from the disbursement of compensation

money to actual relocation was too short. With more time, they would have been able to salvage

more materials from their houses that were demolished. Suggestions mainly relate to the hope for

employment opportunities during the project construction activities.

The results of the post-relocation survey indicate that the compensation and relocation process has

been carried out in line with the stipulations of and safeguard policies.

Currently, four AHs are still categorized as vulnerable, which still require special attention to secure a

stable income for several years. In addition to the four vulnerable AHs, most AHs still require further

assistance as follows:

- Job opportunities for the head of the family, adult son/son-in-law during the construction of the

WWTP and pipe network through contractors.

- Soft loan/capital assistance to run small business/warung/daily goods.

The Palembang City Government is implementing a program for small and medium businesses

consisting of interest-free micro-credits, amortized through monthly instalments. The LPMU will

facilitate access to the program by the AHs in need. It should be noted that most of those who run a

business are women (wife or children or daughter-in-law), so it is possible to work together with the

Office of Women Empowerment, Child Protection and Community Empowerment of the City, where

one of the tasks is the economic empowerment of women.

For AHs hoping for employment opportunities with the project, it is recommended to provide

information to the affected families on job opportunities during construction of the project and

provide the contractors with a list of affected people looking for job opportunities, and encourage

the contractor to hire project affected persons, provided they have the required skills.


March 2018


1 Introduction

1.1 The Project

The Palembang City Off-site Wastewater Collection and Treatment System (the Project) is in

Palembang City, South Sumatra Province, and is one of five subprojects which have been assisted by

the Asian Development Bank under TA 7993 INO: Metropolitan Sanitation Management

Investment Project (MSMIP). The Project, is financed through an Australian grant, national and

municipal budget allocations which has two components: (i) the Wastewater Treatment Plant

(WWTP) Component, and (ii) the Wastewater Collection System (WCS) Component. The WCS will be

constructed along roads and alleys in the centre of the City, to collect wastewater and bio-solids

from business establishments, public markets, and households. The wastewater will be treated at

the WWTP which is located at Kelurahan Sei Selayur in Kecamatan Kalidoni, and the effluent will be

discharged to the Musi River.

For the construction of the WWTP, the city of Palembang has acquired 5.82 ha of land in 2012-2013.

The land acquisition affected a total of 24 households, including three landowners who did not

reside on the location, 16 houses and a part of a drier barrack of a timber factory.

1.2 Background of the Post-Relocation Socio-Economic Survey

The Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) document for the Project was originally prepared

in 2013 and was updated by the CMC Team in line with Safeguard Policy Statement and was

approved in May 2017. The LARP was publicly disclosed on the ADB website in June 2017.

It had been anticipated that the existing data concerning the Affected Persons (APs) and Affected

Households (AHs) would be utilized for an update of the LARP document as per cut-off date for the

LARP. The demographic data were updated in February 2017, while the economic data were

updated in September 2017, as part as a Socio-Economic Survey (SES) activity. The September 2017

survey was commissioned to collect baseline data on the socio-economic conditions of the affected

households.

The purpose of conducting the Post-Relocation SES is to obtain the actual socio-economic data of

individual impacted households, inclusive of members of families that live with the main affected

households, to be compared with the baseline data from previous SES in September 2017 (semi-

annual updating).

1.3 Methodology and the Implementation of Data Collection

The data collected in Post-Relocation SES comprises of:

1) Basic information of the heads of AHs,

2) Socio-economic profile of AHs,

3) Access to public/social facilities,

4) Access to the working places,

5) Current condition of impacted HH, and

6) Opinion/suggestions for project implementation.

Data collection was carried out by members of the CMC team using a structured questionnaire that

reflected the data collected during the baseline study with emphasis on the post-relocation


March 2018


conditions. See Annex 1 for a translation of the survey questionnaire. The survey was conducted on

March 8th and 11th and May 13th, 2018, through face-to-face interviews with the heads of all

affected households or a reliable representative in the case where the household head could not be

reached. Most of the affected households were visited and interviewed in their new residences,

except a family that has moved since 2016 to Pulau Rimau, Kabupaten Banyuasin (around 100 km

north-west of Palembang). Due to the distance to Pulau Rimau, the interview with this family was

conducted in May 2018, during their visit to Sei Selayur.

The SES covered 17 house owners or the main HH family members representing his/her deceased

parents affected by the WWTP construction, also including Ibu Eli Romlah the owner of a house just

outside the WWTP site boundary. She (Ibu Eli) was included in the original SES (2013) and LARP, but

subsequently excluded as her house fell just outside the border of the land purchased. Her house

was acquired by the contractor at terms equal to the other affected households for the project, as a

guard house. In addition, the representative/owner of PT. Zeinit Djaya (wood industry), of which the

dryer kiln rooms were impacted, was not included in the post-relocation survey.

During the implementation of the post-relocation SES, a strong sense of community and

togetherness was observed even though they moved and are not part of the same neighbourhood.

In accordance to ADB Safeguards Policy Statement, a further post-relocation SES shall be repeated in

six to twelve months from the March 2018 survey in order to compare the situation from the

previous survey to assess their socio-economic conditions and to determine if any additional

measures are required.

1.4 Report Structure

The report comprises five chapters that are structured in presenting survey findings and analysis.

Chapter one briefly describes the project, background of the socio-economic survey, and survey

methodology.

Chapter two contains findings and analysis of data collected compared to the baseline data. The

analysis highlights several aspects of the socio-economic condition of affected families, as well as

their perceptions regarding post-relocation conditions.

Chapter three presents the survey findings and what has changed after the relocation.

Chapter four presents the follow-up action and recommendation.

Chapter five provides photo documentation of AHs in their new residences.

There are two annexes that contains translated questionnaires and data sheets of each interview

results with affected households.

2 Socio-Economic Profile of the AHs

This section presents a summary of the March 2018 socio-economic profile of the AHs and their

family members, and the September 2017 education level data. This summary is based on the SES

interview results as summarized in Annex 2.

2.1 Background Context the Resettlement

The land acquisition and resettlement processes for WWTP location was initiated in 2011. Starting

from 2012 (when the land was acquired) until 2017, six AHs have moved to a location 500 meters

from the WWTP site, one AH has moved to land owned in Rawa Bebek, one AH has moved back to


March 2018


land owned in Pulau Rimau (Kabupaten Banyu Asin, about 60 km from the present location) and one

AP has moved to a rented house with her new husband (Eli Romlah, but present status still

divorced).

During the September 2017 SES, eight of the AHs were still living in their original locations and they

were all displaced in October 2017. Two of the AHs moved to their own land in Sematang Borang

and Mata Merah (KPR credited housing complex and owned bought land) about 7-10 km from the

WWTP location. One AH owns land in Rawa Bebek (about 3 km distance from the WWTP). A further

AH has arranged for a rented house in the vicinity.

During the post-relocation SES update in March 2018, all the AHs were settled in their new locations.

Nine AHs (out of 17) moved to a public/rayon land, close to the WWTP site and two AHs moved to a

site very close the WWTP site (Abdul Karim and Talleng/Junaria). From the total of 17 AHs, 14 of

them live in locations in the same Kelurahan Sei Selayur (100 m to 3 km distance), while 2 AHs live in

Kecamatan Sematang Borang (7-7.5 km distance) and 1 AH lives in a different kabupaten.

All affected households acquired the current places individually based on their preferences, financial

capacity, modality and access to information regarding new places. The proximity to their original

residences shows that they have a strong connection with their original location in term of

community and social aspects.

The rayon land is owned by the Provincial Government (= public land) and has been occupied as

vegetable gardens for more than 30 years. Some of the rayon resided families have lived there for

several years. They have legal PDAM, and PLN connections, official RT/RW numbers, and subject to

waste collection fee (iuran sampah) to the kelurahan/kecamatan.

Table 1:

No. Name of Main HH Head Name of HH

Head Current

Residence

Distance to WWTP site (previous residence)

Remarks

1 Khusnun Khusnun Kecamatan Sematang Borang

± 8-10 km Gria Putri Gading Cempaka housing complex (the house is owned by his second daughter who works in Tangerang).

2 Iwan Adrianto Iwan Adrianto

Jl. M. Zen, Sei Selayur

± 2-3 km He lives temporarily in a rented house because his new house on public/rayon land is still under construction.

3 Romi Romi Rawa Bebek ± 3 km Presently Pak family is living in their own house. He bought the land from his brother in law in 2013 (300 m2). The status of land is recognized under the s letter. The family has moved to the new house 3 months ago, while previously they stayed with his brother in family.

4 Abdul Karim Abdul Karim Jl. Ir. Sutami RT 13/ RW04

± 100-200 m nted house near

brother (± 200 m from WWTP site).

5 Talleng/Junaria (daughter)

Talleng Jl. Ir. Sutami RT 13/ RW04

± 100-200 m Back to his (previously eatery warung) built over the drainage canal.

Wikram (Ju husband)

(joined to take care of her father)

Near WWTP site Jaya, has been rented out (monthly).

6 Sulaiman Sulaiman New house, Jl. M. Zen, Lorong Amelia no. 59, RT 24 RW 07

± 1.5 km living in their own house from January 2018, while previously they stayed in rented house for 4 months (from Oct. 2017).


March 2018



Head Current

Residence

Distance to WWTP site (previous residence)

Remarks

7 Sophia (Alm)/Acek Ramah

Dirmansyah (Acek husband)

New house/hut ± 0.5 km Public/rayon land.

8 Yakub/Wiwik R.

Yakub

husband)

Mata Merah), still under construction

± 10 km She moved her warung temporarily about 20 m from the current place (at Pusri land); For the time being family is staying at a rented house in Mata Merah, near her new house under construction.

Fajar Ramlan

Not living in the same house.

9 Tobing Tobing Public/rayon land Muara Kelingi no. 090, RT. 41/ RW. 04

± 0.5 km Moved in 2012.

shared the land for each of their houses.

Waluyo Kms. Muchsin Andi Mandela

New place (parents in law)

10 km Mata Merah, Credited house (not included in this updated SES).

10 Wancik Teguh Wancik Teguh

Public/rayon land Muara Kelingi no. 113, RT. 41/ RW. 04

± 0.5 km Own house (newly bought); moved in 2013.

11 Abbas (Alm)/Misran

Misran Separated house

Not included in the SES, previously only represented by his deceased father Abbas for the LARP processes.

Astutik/Isnen Lampung Moved to Lampung to join her husband. Suwarti Rawa Bebek ± 3 km Rented house. Daryuni Jl. M. Zen, Sei

Selayur ± 3 km Rented house.

12 M. Isa (Alm)/Nisa

Nisa Public/rayon land - Muara Kelingi no. 108, RT. 41/ RW. 04

± 0.5 km Moved in 2012. Shared house (Nisa and Supriyatna) built on land.

Supriyatna

13 Sumanto Sumanto Public/rayon land - Muara Kelingi, RT. 41/ RW. 04

± 0.5 km Moved in 2013. Shared land with her daughter (Nora).

14 Nora Yayat Public/rayon land - Muara Kelingi no. 158, RT. 41/ RW. 04

± 0.5 km Moved in 2013. Shared land with her parents (Sumanto).

15 Samsuri (Alm)/ Turinik

Turinik

wife)

Public/rayon land - Muara Kelingi no. 112, RT. 41/ RW. 04

± 0.5 km Moved in 2015. family shares the space inside the

house for all family members. Syarudi Apriyandi Robi

16 Hafizah Jumain Pulau Rimau 90-100 km Kabupaten Banyuasin; moved in 2016. 17 Eli Romlah Eli R.

(divorced) Jl. Mayor Zen, Sei Selayur

Rented house; moved in 2017 (divorced from her husband because she does not want to move to Makassar).


March 2018


2.2 Demographic Profile

According to the September 2017 SES, the total number of affected families was 28 within 17 main

HHs. During the March 2018 SES, the total number of interviewed families was 26 within 17 affected

main HHs. Two families that are no longer included in the affected families list are, i) Mr.

youngest son, Andi, who moved to his parents - in-law house with his wife, and ii) Mrs. Astutik

(Isnen), who was previously living with the Abbas family, moved with her children to Lampung to join

her husband.

Family members of affected households range from 2 to 13 members, with an average of 5.3

members. Figure 1 shows that 12 AHs (67%) have 2-5 family members, 5 AHs (28%) with 6-9 family

members, and 1 AH (5%) with 13 family members. Affected households with more than five family

members usually consist of 2-4 households that living in the same house; there are 3 AHs with 2

households in the same house, 1 AH with 3 households and 1 AH with 4 households.

Figure 1 Number of Family Member Living in the Same House within AHs

There are 95 APs, including Ibu Eli Romlah and her son who lived just outside the site boundary. Of

the total 95 APs, 48 are female and 47 are male. Based on age group distribution, 60 persons (29

female and 31 male) or 63.2% are in the labour force, with ages between 15-64 years old. Four

people are categorized as elderly (over 65 years), comprises of 2 female and 2 male.

67%(12 AHs)

28%(5 AHs)

5% (1 AH)

2 - 5 family members



12%(11 persons)

21%(20 persons)63%

(60 persons)

4%(4 persons)

0-4 years age

5-14 years age

15-64 years age

Figure 2 Affected Person Composition based on Age Distribution


March 2018


Table 2 shows the household composition data, based on age and gender distribution according to

the post-relocation SES March 2018.

Table 2: Age and Gender Distribution of APs (updated status May 2018)

Household Composition Family Members Female (age group) Male (age group)

No Name of Main HH Head Name of HH Head Female Male 0-4 5 - 14 15-64 6 0-4 5 - 14 15-64 6

1 Khusnun Khusnun 4 2 4 1 1

2 Iwan Adrianto Iwan Adrianto 2 2 1 1 1 1

3 Romi Romi 2 3 1 1 3

4 Abdul Karim Abdul Karim 1 2 1 2

5 Talleng (Junaria) Talleng

1 5 1 2 2 1 Wikram

6 Sulaiman Sulaiman 3 2 2 1 1 1

7 Sophia Alm (Acek Ramah) Dirmansyah 1 2 1 1 1

8 Wiwik R/ (Yakub) Yakub

4 3 2 1 1 1 2 Fajar

9 Tobing

Tobing

6 3 2 2 2 2 1 Waluyo

Kms Muchsin

10 Wancik Teguh Wancik Teguh 1 1 1 1

11 Abbas Alm [Misran*)] Daryuni 2 2 1 1 1 1

Suwarti 2 3 2 3

12 M. Isa Alm (Nisa) Nisa

5 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 Supriyatna

13 Sumanto Sumanto 2 3 2 3

14 Nora (Acok) Yayat 2 2 1 1 1 1

15 Samsuri Alm (Turinik)

Turinik

7 6 2 1 4 1 1 4 Syarudi

Apriyandi

Robi

16 Hafizah Jumain 2 2 2 1 1

17 Eli Romlah Eli Romlah 1 1 1 1

Totals 26 HHs 48 47 7 10 29 2 4 10 31 2 Note: *) Misran represented Abbas (his father) for house acquisition and compensation/payment process, but since long ago was not

living in the same house with his sisters/brother in law. For this post-relocation SES, family is presented by Daryuni and Suwarti

daughters), while Isnen and kids had been moved to Lampung followed her husband.

2.3 Education

Based on SES September 2017, from 69 APs who are in the productive age group between 15-59

years old, 9 persons (13%) are illiterate (not having attended an elementary school or not finished

elementary school). All other household members (87%) within those age groups are literate with

elementary school as the lowest level of education. Out of those who are literate, 5 APs (7.25%)

have higher education up to a Diploma or a University degree and 7 APs (10.15%) are still students.


March 2018


The findings from the SES March 2018 show that 28 family members are in an education age

category (6-18 years old) age, comprising 12 girls and 16 boys. There are 11 girls out of 12 who are in

school, and one girl age 18 who is a housewife. Meanwhile, two boys of ages between 15 and 18 are

not in school and work as construction labours and an ojek driver.

The primary school is within walkable distance from most of the new AHs residences, ranging from

400 meters to 1 km. Only two AHs have a distance greater than 1km from a primary school, one AH

in Sematang Borang (5 km to primary school) and one AH in Pulau Rimau (30 km to reach a school

and other basic services).

2.4 Occupations

As summarized in Table 3, in March 2018, 11 people work as construction workers, 8 as factory

workers, 1 as shop/cafÈ worker, 7 are running small businesses such as eatery/food sellers, sewer or

clothing creditor, 1 as security guard, 4 as drivers (car/ojek) and 3 as salespersons. One AHs member

(of deceased Abbas) work outside the area as a household helper (housemaid, Ibu Suwarti), and one

person works outside of the country (Singapore) as a migrant worker (housemaid, Hermawati of

. One AHs member works as a trainee teacher and one AH

member is a farme , in Pulau Rimau, around 60 km from Sei Selayur, on their

own land (coconut and corn).

Of the 13 types of occupations, 7 occupations are considered formal jobs which have regular

payment and working schedule.

Table 3: Current Occupations of Household Members (updated status May 2018)

Occupation SES March 2018 SES September 2017

Remarks Number % of Total Number % of Total

Factory worker 8 14% 8 13.1 Formal

Shop/cafÈ worker 1 2% 4 6.5 Formal

Security 1 2% 2 3.3 Formal

Sales clerk 3 5% 3 4.9 Formal

Teacher/trained teacher 1 2% 1 1.6 Formal

Migrant worker 1 2% 1 1.6 Formal BUMN/Gov.staff/teacher - - 2 3.3 Formal

Farmer 1 2% 1 1.6 Informal

Construction worker 11 19% 10 16.4 Informal

Small business (sewer, creditor, eatery cum) 7 12% 6 9.9 Informal

Driver (car/ojek) 3 5% 2 3.3 Informal Becak (pedicab driver) 1 2% - - Informal

Housemaid 1 2% - - Informal

Housewife 9 16% 12 19.7 -

1 2% - - -

Student [active, (+ 1 disabled)] 8 14% 7 11.5 - Unemployed (looking for job) - - 2 3.3 -

Total 57 100% 61 100.0


March 2018


2.5 Monthly Incomes

The AHs have an average household income of Rp3,824,556 per month, with the lowest being

Rp1,500,000 (Iwan Adrianto, he resigned from his previous job in PT. Zeinit due to a labour dispute).

The highest is Rp9,800,000 (Ibu Wiwik/Yakub, although decreased from the previous status). To

calculate the monthly per-capita income, the monthly household income was divided by the number

of persons still living in the same place/house. The average of monthly per-capita income is

Rp777,297, with the lowest at Rp300.000 (M. Isa/Nisa family), while the highest is Rp1,780,000

(Suwarti/daughter of deceased Abbas, since all her family members already have their own

respective income).

The average household monthly income in SES March 2018 is lower than SES September 2017,

Rp3,824,556 and Rp4,301,134 respectively. However, the average income per capita is increasing,

Rp777,297 in March 2018 as compared to Rp729,464 in the September 2017 survey.

Comparing the incomes from September 2017 SES to March 2018, the incomes of 6 families

have decreased (Khusnun, Iwan, Abdul Karim, Talleng/Junaria, Wiwik/Yakub, Ibu Hafizah); 7 family

incomes have increased (Sulaiman, Tobing, Wancik, M. Isa/Nisa, Sumanto, Samsuri/Syarudi, Eli

Romlah); and 3 famil incomes are the same as before (Romi, Acek Ramah, Acok/Nora). For Ibu

Daryuni and Ibu Suwarti, acting as the representative of the Abbas family, their family income is

better (higher) compared to the previous data of September 2017 (from Abbas family figure).

Figure 3 Monthly Family Income, Expenditures and Per Capita

Compared to the Palembang poverty threshold of Rp480,375 per person/month in a

household for 20171, the March 2018 SES data shows that two AHs are below the threshold and two

AHs are only slightly above the threshold. The lowest per-capita family income is M. Isa/Nisa family,

where 8 family members have a per-capita income of only Rp300.000 per month. Another critical

1 Palembang City in Figures, BPS Palembang City 2018

- 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 2,000,000

-

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

AH01

AH02

AH03

AH04

AH05

AH06

AH07

AH08

AH09

AH10

AH11a

AH11b

AH12

AH13

AH14

AH15

AH16

AH17 P

er c

apita

Inco

me/

Exp

endi

ture

s (ID

R)

Fam

ily In

com

e/E

xpen

ditu

res

(IDR

)

Affected Households (AH)

Family Income Family Expenditures

Per capita Income Per capita expenditures


March 2018


case is the Samsuri/Syarudi family with a monthly per capita income of Rp484,615 with the highest

number of family members (13) living together in a small house.

Compared to September 2017, with Palembang poverty threshold of Rp456,225 per

person/month in a household for 20162, the 2017 SES data show that four AHs were below the

threshold. Despite the small increase in per capita income, one AH (M. Isa/Nisa) is constantly below

the poverty line both in September 2017 and March 2018.

Table 4: Monthly Family and Per-Capita Income (updated status March 2018)

No. Name of Main HH Head Total HH members

Family income

(Rp/month)

Per-Capita income

(Rp/month) Remarks: Increased, Decreased, or the same,

compare to Sep 2017

1 Khusnun 6 4,600,000 766,667 Decreased; no extra works since PT. Zenith operation is decreasing due to factory relocation

2 Iwan Adrianto 4 1,500,000 375,000 Decreased, fell below the poverty line; resigned from PT. Zenith 3 Romi 5 4,900,000 980,000 Same as before

4 Abdul Karim 3 2,000,000 666,667 Decreased; took early retirement package from PT. Lestari Magis (shrimp processing), now working at PT. Lestari ice factory

5 Talleng/Junaria (daughter) 6 2,900,000 483,333

Decreased, near the poverty line; family income is increasing but per capita income is decreasing due to additional family member Pak Taleng moved back from Sulawesi

6 Sulaiman 5 2,717,000 543,400 Increased, previously below the poverty line; income increase due to safety net assistances (BOS & PKH)

7 Sophia (Alm)/Acek Ramah 3 1,600,000 533,333 Same as before

8 Yakub/Wiwik R. (including Fajar,

7 9,800,000 1,400,000 Decreased, but still far above the poverty line; must resettled warung (eatery seller)

9 Tobing 9 6,300,000 700,000 Increased; new small eatery business

10 Wancik Teguh 2 2,100,000 1,050,000 Increased; sales increase, minimize the expenditures, and good saving

11 daughter) 4 3,000,000 750,000 New data, previously living in the same house;

income situation the same for Daryuni and slightly better off for Suwarti

daughter) 5 8,900,000 1,780,000

12 M. Isa/Nisa 8 2,400,000 300,000 Very small increase, though still far below the poverty line; less 1 family member

13 Sumanto 5 2,600,000 520,000 Increased; less 1 family member and the wife started working as a food seller

14 only) 4 2,400,000 600,000 Same as before

15 Samsuri/Syarudi (Turinik) 13 6,300,000 484,615 Increased, but still near the poverty line

16 Hafizah 3 2,125,000 708,333 Decreased, but still above poverty level; depend on farm harvest

2 Palembang City in Figures, BPS Palembang City 2017


March 2018


17 Eli Romlah (without her new husband)

2 2,700,000 1,350,000 Increase in sales/revenues

Average 4,049,529 823,021

2.6 Vulnerable Households

The ADB Safeguards Policy Statement defines Vulnerable Groups as follows: are distinct

groups of people who might suffer disproportionately, or face the risk of being further marginalized

due to the project and specifically include: (i) households that are headed by women with

dependents, (ii) household heads with disabilities, (iii) households falling under the generally

accepted indicator for poverty, (iv) elderly households who are landless and with no other means of

support, and (v) landless

Based on the above criteria, the SES March 2018 data identified the following vulnerable AHs:

Mrs. Nisa and Sarwinah, her daughter family: widow of the late Mr. Isa, 82 years old. The

household comprises eight persons, with only her son-in-law working as a construction labourer.

The monthly per capita income is Rp300.000 which is considerably below the poverty line.

Mr. Iwan Adrianto: The household comprises of four persons. Mr. Iwan lost his previous job,

while his wife is still looking for a new opportunity since she cannot continue her sewing

business. The monthly per capita income is Rp375.000 (below the poverty line).

Mr. Talleng (widower)/Junaria, 71 years old. The household comprises six persons, one son-in-

law who works as a construction labourer. The monthly per capita income is Rp483.333 (close

the poverty line).

Mrs. Turinik, widow of the late Mr. Samsuri, 60 years old. The household consists of 13 persons.

Two of her sons and two of her sons-in-laws work as construction laborers. The monthly per

capita income is Rp484,615 (close to the poverty line).

Beside those four AHs, there are AHs which are just above the poverty line:

Mr. Sumanto; living in an unfinished house, depends on informal jobs, and has a family member

with a disability (one of daughter is having speech impairment). The monthly per

capita income is above the poverty line at Rp520,000.

Mrs. Acek Ramah; suffers from epilepsy and has an infant child, the husband working as a

factory labour at PT. Zeinit Wood Mill, but with a small income, living in an unfinished house.

The monthly per capita income is above the poverty line at Rp533,333.

Mr. Sulaiman; living in an unfinished house reside in parents in land, depends on informal

jobs. The monthly per capita income is above the poverty line at Rp543,400, which includes

subsidy from the government social protection net assistance (PKH and school subsidy).

2.7 Sanitation Conditions

The sanitation conditions for the post-relocation is categorized are improved. Twelve main AHs are

customers of the municipal water supply company (PDAM) and one AH receives piped water from

the nearby PUSRI fertilizer factory. Seven main AHs buy refilled/bottled water for drinking, while

others are using PDAM water also for drinking and cooking. Two families obtain water for bathing

and washing from shallow dug wells, one AH combined with stored rainwater and another AH

combined with shared PDAM water from her parents. Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) is used for


March 2018


drinking water and river is used for washing and bathing by an AH living at the farm hut in Pulau

Rimau.

Before the relocation, two AHs obtained their domestic water supply from the Musi River. For

sanitation, previously 8 AHs were using a toilet without a septic tank and 1 AH was using a pit latrine.

Figure 5 Source of Domestic Water Supply

At present all AHs have a toilet or shared toilet, two of the facilities are without a septic tank. In

addition, all AHs have a bathroom inside or attached to their houses, and/or shared with their

parents. Fourteen AHs deposit their solid waste in a collection place (TPS) and only three AHs still

burn their solid waste.

Figure 6 Post-Relocation Sanitation Facility

2.8 Access to Social Services

Access to basic services, such as primary and high schools, mosques, markets, and health facilities,

are still within easy reach by most of AHs, with distance varying from 0.1 km to 5 km. An exception is

for the AH that has moved to a farm hut in Pulau Rimau, which must travel around 30 km to access

most of the basic public services due to the location remoteness.

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

WC with septic tank

share toilet

WC without septic tank

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

PDAM refilled water Rain WaterHarvesting 0 5 10 15

dug well

dug well & shared pdam

dug well with pump

PDAM

piped from pusri

river

Figure 4 Source of Drinking Water


March 2018


2.9 Access to Places of Work

Of the affected households, 8 AHs have family members that work within a 5 km radius, 5 AHs have

family members that work within a 6 km to 10 km radius, and 3 AHs have family members that work

within a 10 km to 25 km radius. Most of the AHs use motorcycles to travel to their workplaces, while

only 2 AHs have no motorcycles to reach their working places (1km-1.5km).

The working distance is approximately the same as compared to their original houses before

displacement. Besides this, approximately 20% of the affected people work as construction

labourers at varying locations within Kota Palembang.

Figure 7 Working Distance

2.10 Compensation Money Usage

Table 5 below shows that most impacted AHs have used a major part or all of their compensation money for housing purposes, i.e., building a new house, buy materials for renovating or extending

their existing house, or to pay rent for a temporary residence. Paying school fees ranks second. Five

AHs have invested part of the money for business purposes, i.e., buying motorcycles for on-call

transportation (ojek) or capital for small businesses. Some AHs utilised part of their compensation for helping relatives and/or donations for religious purposes.

Table 5: Usage of Compensation Money


Head Compensation Used Remarks 1 Khusnun Khusnun Built additional rooms, including land filling; paying

school fees; some saving House is owned by his daughter

2 Iwan Adrianto Iwan Adrianto Bought land (150 m2) and built the foundation for a house; paying school fees; paying rent for house; daily needs

Bought land and built house on public/rayon land

3 Romi Romi All money used to build his house Owned land in Rawa Bebek

4 Abdul Karim Abdul Karim All money used to build his house in Bangka (on his land); paying school fees

Temporarily

house for rent

50%(8 AHs)

31%(5 AHs)

19%(3 AHs)

6 km - 10 km

>10 km


March 2018



Head Compensation Used Remarks

5 Talleng/Junaria Talleng/Junaria The money was divided among his 7 children of Talleng siblings); Junaria to renovate his house and paying school fees

Temporary stayed at their hut near WWTP site

6 Sulaiman Sulaiman To build their house (unfinished); paying rent (4 months)

On his wife land

7 Sophia (Alm)/Acek Ramah

Dirmansyah (Acek husband)

Divided among her 6 siblings; to buy a hut; and buying some additional materials for their house

On public/rayon land

8 Wiwik R./Yakub Yakub husband)

Additional money to build their house (still unfinished); paying school fees; paying rented house

At Mata Merah

9 Tobing (with all his daughters/son)

Tobing Divided among his children; to buy additional materials for his house; as capital for small eatery business (Ambar)


10 Wancik Teguh Wancik Teguh To pay the house (30 million IDR, half paid only to his nephew); to buy new motorcycle in cash; additional capital for goods to be credited to others (Muliati).


11 Abbas (Alm)/Misran, with all his siblings

Daryuni Divided to Daryuni 3-daughters (and some of for Pak Misran as his representing his deceased father); for donation to the mosque and orphans; to rehabilitate (together with her siblings) Pak

grave.

Compensation money of deceased Abbas is divided among his 3-daughters (Daryuni, Astutik, Suwarti). Astutik have moved to Lampung

Suwarti Paying for house rental; donation to the mosque and (Eidul Adha); etc.; sharing costs with her siblings for house rehabilitate), Pak grave, and daily needs.

12 M. Isa (Alm)/Nisa/ Supriyatna

Nisa/Supriyatna (Sarwinah)

Cost for Daud grandson) marriage; to buy some additional building materials; to buy a lamb for on behalf of M. Isa; saving for student fees (of grandchildren, children).


13 Sumanto Sumanto To buy a new motorcycle in cash for transportation; to pay their credit of building materials to the material shop.


14 Nora/and Acok Yayat Divided with Acok brother); to pay their credit of building materials to the material shop and install the electricity; cost for giving birth and others daily needs.


15 Samsuri (Alm)/ Turinik, with all her daughters/sons

Turinik/Syarudi To build additional room/s (buy building materials); paying school fees (grandchildren); to buy a lamb as for deceased Samsuri.


16 Hafizah Jumain To buy corn seeds and fertilizer; pay school fees; daily needs.

Moved to farm in Pulau Rimah

17 Eli Romlah Eli R. (divorced) Divided for 4 siblings; paying for house rental -

Home-related expenses had the greatest usage of compensation money, including building or

renovating a house, buying material for building a house, or paying debt on housing materials. Figure

9 shows the various usage by affected households. The pattern of usage also describes the priority

that reflects household vulnerability aspects or ability to fulfil basic needs.


March 2018


Figure 8 Usage of Resettlement Compensation Money by Affected Households

Figure 8 shows that most of the AHs utilized the compensation money for build their new home,

followed by paying study fees and shared with children/relatives. One AH was able to save some of

the compensation money.

2.11 Current Condition of Impacted HHs

As detailed in Table 6 below, the majority (eleven) of the main impacted AHs rated their current

conditions as better off compared to their previous conditions; four of the impacted HHs rated their

current conditions as almost the same as before, and three rated their conditions as worse than

before. AHs, that stated to be better off explained that they now feel more secure and have a better

house. AHs, that rated their present conditions as the same as before and their explanation was that

they had no better choice of place to move to due to their limited funds. Notably, in the case of the

AHs that feel worse off, their conditions is are caused by the need to relocate, but due to loss of a

job, which is not related to the project.

Nevertheless, all AHs hope to be given the opportunity for family members to be employed by the

project during constructions. Six AHs hope to be given access for a soft loan for expanding their

business.

Table 6: Current Condition of AHs

No. Name of Main HH Head/HH Head Overall Current

Condition Explanation Further Assistance Needed 1 Khusnun Better off More peaceful Yes: soft loan for small business

(small shop, livestock); to be involved as the worker

2 Iwan Adrianto Worse off Lost job, changing neighbourhood, difficulties to get a proper house

Yes: to be involved as the worker (as a driver or security); soft loan assistance for small business (his wife)

3 Romi Better off More peaceful and bigger house.

Yes: Job opportunity for his son; and job opportunity for his wife (if possible)

4 Abdul Karim Better off Could build his house in Bangka

Yes: Job opportunity for his son; additional job opportunity for him (as a security officer perhaps)

3

13

7

1

5

5

6

3

2

2

2

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Buying land

Build home

Paying study fees

Saving

Rented house

Daily needs

Shared with children/relatives

Capital for small business

Buy motorcycle

Donations

Other

Number of AHs


March 2018


No. Name of Main HH Head/HH Head Overall Current

Condition Explanation Further Assistance Needed

5 Talleng/Wikram husband)

Almost the same (Junaria)

Pak Talleng worse-off since he is elderly and has no work

Yes: Living support (Pak Talleng); job opportunity for husband; soft loan for starting small business (Junaria)

6 Sulaiman Worse off Having no certain job (labourer)

Yes: Job opportunity (Sulaiman); soft loan or free subsidy for small business support/allowance (wife)

7 Sophia (Alm)/Dirmansyah (Aceh husband)

Almost the same as before

But afford better house Yes: Living support/subsidy; job opportunity for Dirmansyah (as PT. Zeinit planned to be relocate)

8 Wiwik R./Yakub Better off Additional money for their new house.

Yes: Soft loan/credit for her warung to be moved to another more convenient place/land; job opportunity for her brother (Fajar)

9 Tobing Worse off Noisy and smelly area (very near to NPK fertilizer factory), unsecure area (criminals), only could move to the same unsecured land status.

Yes: Equal access for men and women to the Project job opportunity; assistance for house renovation/improvement

10 Wancik Teguh Better off More convenient and no flooding.

Yes: soft loan or capital assistance for her wife) business (goods creditor)

11 Abbas (Alm)/Misran Daryuni case

Better off Close to brother/sister, more convenient and no flooding.

Yes: Job opportunities for young people.

case Better off More convenience and tidy, but still rented house.

Yes: Job opportunity for young people (youth), especially youth


Better off If flooded not too long, house built on land with clearer status

Yes: Job opportunity for Sarwinah husband and/or her son in the Project if he has suitable for capacities for the job openings.

13 Sumanto Almost the same But lack of security (some criminals), and less desirable neighbourhood.

Yes: Soft loan/capital assistance to run small business/warung; job opportunities in the Project for husband (Sumanto), if he has suitable capacities for the available job openings.

14 Nora (and Acok)/ Yayat husband)

Almost the same Access road not muddy/ slippery, however less convenient, hot/miserable

Yes: Job opportunities for local people in the Project with better fee/salary if they have suitable capacities for the available job openings.

15 Samsuri (Alm)/ Turinik/Syarudi

Better off Land status of their house is clearer.

Yes: Job opportunities for local people in the Project if they have suitable capacities for the available job openings.

16 Hafizah Better off - Job opportunity for her nephew in the Project; soft loan for opening a warung.

17 Eli Romlah Better off Living place is better/healthy, and good for business

Yes: Job opportunity for her son (and other youth) in the Project; soft loan for starting a new small business.


March 2018


2.12 Opinion/Suggestions about Project Implementation

As detailed in Table 7 below, a considerable number of AHs stated that the time given from the

disbursement of compensation to actual relocation was too short. With more time, they would have

been able to salvage materials from their houses that were demolished. Suggestions mainly relate to

the hope for employment opportunities during the project construction activities.

Figure 9 Opinion and Suggestions Regarding Implementation of Land Acquisition and Resettlement

Table 7: Opinion/Suggestions about

No. Name of Main HH Head Opinion/Suggestions

1 Khusnun No problems related to the project. 2 Iwan Adrianto Should have been given more time to relocate. 3 Romi Further other projects in the future, measurements of impacted assets and calculations of

compensation values should be implemented more precisely; the owner of the impacted assets should be informed first before taking measurements (in his opinion, his impacted house size was the same size as Pak Khusnun and Pak Iwan houses).

4 Abdul Karim He is satisfied with all the acquisition and compensation process. He hopes for further job opportunities suitable for his son in the Project.

5 Talleng/Wikram husband)

The Project if possible should improve the access road; WWTP operation should not disturb surrounding environment (bad smell); Resettlement should not be carried out too quickly so that people can re-use the salvaged materials.

6 Sulaiman The acquisition process should not be carried too quickly so that people can prepare themselves well and can keep/maintain the salvage materials.

7 Sophia (Alm)/Dirmansyah (Aceh husband)

Resettlement process should not have been carried out too quickly so that people could prepare themselves well and keep salvaged materials.

8 Wiwik R./Yakub (i) Notification for acquisition implementation process should not have been carried out in a hurry (with very short time notice); (ii) Giving priority for local workers suitable for their capabilities/qualifications; (iii) Do not pollute the surrounding environment; (iv) Provide priority for her to open/run a small canteen after the Project is completed if possible.

9 Tobing Further other projects in the future, measurements of impacted assets and calculations of compensation values should be implemented more precisely because in his experience there is a discrepancy of the actual size of his assets with Government measurement; Give priority of job opportunity to the people in the vicinity of the project first, particularly for AHs members. Equal opportunities should be given to men and women.

10 Wancik Teguh/Muliati

Give priority of job opportunities to the people in the vicinity of the project first, such as for his/her nephew, if possible, for a position that suits his skills.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

No more problem

More time to relocate

More price measurement of impacted assetsand calculation of compensation

Jobs vacancy/job opportunity

Improving access road

WWTP operation should not disturb surrondingenvironment


March 2018


No. Name of Main HH Head Opinion/Suggestions

11 Abbas (Alm)/Misran Daryuni/Suwarti

Notification for moving to the AHs from their previous site (WWTP) should be conducted more carefully, through with time for consideration of situation and sufficient time to make removal arrangements.


Giving job opportunity priority to the AHs members, husband and son. They need positions suitable for their skills.

13 Sumanto Satisfied enough with the process of Project implementation, even though their house already during measurement and compensation calculation.

14 Nora/Yayat husband)

Not satisfied enough with the latest result of measurements and compensation calculation (why is there a difference between the initial measurement and calculations).

15 Samsuri (Alm)/ Turinik/Syarudi

Giving priority of possible job opportunities in the Project to the local people first, especially to the AHs directly impacted by relocation. Equal opportunities should be given to men and women and opportunities should be given to locals with adequate skills for the available positions.

16 Hafizah Give priority of job opportunities to the people in the vicinity of the project first, such as for her nephew (if possible), for a position that suits his capability.

17 Eli Romlah There is no more problem with the Project, however she hopes for a job opportunity for her son (if possible) for a position that suits his capability.

3 Conclusions

The results of the post-relocation survey indicate that the compensation and relocation process has been carried out in line with the stipulations of and safeguard policies.

Access to workplaces does not appear to have been a dominant factor in the decision about where

to move for the majority of the AHs. Financial aspects and access to affordable land or housing are

more important factors in choosing a new residence. Nine AHs have moved to public/rayon land

near the WWTP site which they considered more affordable than a location in residential or housing

complex. In addition to affordability a strong community sense has also influenced the choice of the

new place of residence. Meanwhile, eight AHs have moved to their own land further away from the

WWPT site.

Sanitation conditions at the current living places can be categorized as fairly-healthy. Twelve main

AHs have connections to the municipal water supply company (PDAM) and one AH receives piped

water from the nearby PUSRI fertilizer factory. All AHs have toilet and bathroom facilities inside or

attached to their house, and/or shared with their house.

At the site where most AHs had have relocated, they have access to electricity, piped water from the

municipal water company (PDAM) and access to garbage collection facilities.

All AHs have access to basic social services such as a market, religious facilities, schools and health

services not very far from where they reside (0.5 km to 5 km).

Nevertheless, the present socio-economic conditions of the AHs still vary considerably. The number

of persons in each household all members residing under one roof and operating as a single

economic unit according to the ADB definition, varies from two to 13 persons. Monthly per capita

incomes range from Rp 300.000 to Rp 1,780,000. Four AHs are below, or close to the poverty line of

Rp 480.735.

Four AHs are still classified as vulnerable according to ADB criteria, and three other AHs are

categorized as vulnerable to fall into poverty. Remarkably, the main source of income for the

majority of the APs is from wage labour, which carries the risk of seasonal fluctuations (seasonal

unemployment). These AHs will require specific attention. As a minimal measure, construction


March 2018


contractors should be urged to employ these workers during the construction of the WWTP and pipe

network thereby securing a stable income over several years.

4 Follow-up Action and Recommendation

As described in the above SES results, currently four AHs are categorized as vulnerable based on the

ADB criteria which still require special attention to secure stable income for several years. In

addition to the seven vulnerable AHs, most AHs still require further assistance:

- Job opportunities for the head of the family, adult son/son-in-law during the construction of

the WWTP and pipe network through contractors.

- Soft loan/capital assistance to run small businesses/warung/goods creditor.

One of the Palembang City Government programs for small and medium businesses called

Program Peningkatan Ekonomi Kerakyatan Kepada Usaha Mikro Kecil melalui Pemberian Kredit Tanpa Bunga dan Tanpa Agunan 3. The program has been implemented since 2017 and consists of interest-free micro-credits, amortised through monthly instalments.

In a meeting / socialization of safeguards at the offices of Bappeda Litbang of Palembang City on

May 15, 2018, the chairman of the meeting (Head of Bappeda and Litbang / LPMU Chair) stated he

would facilitate the assistance. It should be noted that most of those who run a business are women

(wife or children or daughter-in-law), so it is possible to work together with the Office of Women

Empowerment, Child Protection and Community Empowerment Palembang (Dinas Pemberdayaan

Perempuan, Perlindungan Anak dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Palembang), where one of the tasks

is the economic empowerment of women.

The mechanism and implementation of such assistance still need to be discussed further with the

agencies and related parties.

The following actions are recommended:

Provide the AHs with information on the program of Dinas UKM;

LPMU to arrange for a recommendation to Dinas UKM to include the concerned families in the

micro-credit program;

Provide information to the affected families on job opportunities during construction of the

project and provide the contractors with a list of affected people looking for job opportunities;

Oblige the contractor to hire project affected persons, provided they have the required skills;

To ensure an appropriate treatment of individuals affected by the displacement and involuntary

resettlement, CMC will conduct follow-up surveys amongst the AHs within a period of 6 to 12

months as specified in the LARP.

3 The loan amount is Rp3 million with fixed monthly installment of Rp250,000. The mechanism of a loan request is processed through the kelurahan office. (Berita Pemerintah Kota Palembang, Beranda /v2).


March 2018


5 Post-Relocation SES - Photo documentation

lingi Public Land

Ibu Turinik is one of the vulnerable AHs (moved in 2015)

Public land

Ibu Nisa is one of the vulnerable AHs (moved in 2012)

elingi RT. 013/RW. 04 Public land

(moved in 2013)

Fishpond beside the house


March 2018


Pemda land

(200 m from WWTP location moved in October 2017)

(own house moved in Januari 2018, from Oct. 2017 they lived with his sister)

Zen, Lorong Amelia no. 59, RT.

24/RW. 07

(own house moved in January 2018, from Oct. 2017 he stayed at rented house)


March 2018


construction),

Jl. Taqwa Mata Merah, Kelurahan

Sematang Borang

months (moved in October 2017)


March 2018

Indonesia Australia Partnership for Infrastructure (KIAT) I-1

I. Annex 1: English translation of the SES questionnaire

A. BASIC INFORMATION ON THE HEAD OF THE AFFECTED HOUSEHOLD (AH)

1. Name 2. Gender [ ] Male [ ] Female

3. Address 4. Code of AH

5. Civil Status [ ] Single [ ] Widow/Widower [ ] Common law / Live-in

[ ] Married [ ] Separated/Divorced

6. Physical condition [ ] Normal [ ] Handicapped Specify: ________________________

7. Status of presently used land and house [ ] owned with certificate [ ] owned without certficate [ ] rented

[ ] occupied with owner consent [ ] other

8. What has the compensation money been used for [ ] [ ] [ ]

B. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF THE AFFECTED HOUSEHOLD (AH)

1. Size of AH (number of persons presently living with the household)

[ ] 1 [ ] 3 [ ] 5 [ ] 7

[ ] 2 [ ] 4 [ ] 6 [ ] Other: ____ (Specify number)

2. Number of families in the household

[ ] 1 [ .. ] Other: ____ (Specify how many families make up the AH)

[ ] 2

3. Information on persons living with the AH

Father Mother

Children/Members of AH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

a. Age

b. Gender M F

c. Primary source(s) of livelihood

None, still in school

None, retired/old/sick

Farming

Raising livestock

Selling goods

Restaurant/eatery

Farm laborer

Factory/shop worker

Government employee

Private employee

Transport operator

Driver

Remittances (in-country)

Remittances (abroad)

Other (Specify _______________________________)


March 2018


4. Monthly income of AH Rp [ ] none

5. Monthly household expenses Expense Items

Amount Rp Food Clothing Housing Education Health

6. Sanitation

a. Source(s) of potable water [ ] Own well [ ] Own faucet connected to provider

[ ] Public well [ ] Buy from retailers

[ ] Public faucet [ ] Other (Specify ________________)

b. Water for washing/bathing [ ] Own well [ ] Own faucet connected to provider

[ ] Public well [ ] Buy from retailers

[ ] Public faucet [ ] Other (Specify ________________)

c. Toilet facilities [ ] Water-sealed [ ] Open pit [ ] None

[ ] Flush [ ] Public toilet

[ ] Closed pit [ ] Other (Specify ________________)

d. Bathing facilities [ ] Own bathroom [ ] None

[ ] Public bath [ ] Other (Specify ________________)

e. Solid waste disposal [ ] Collected [ ] Dumped by AH on wasteland

[ ] Burned/buried by AH [ ] Other (Specify ________________)

7. Main source of power for lighting [ ] Electricity from provider [ ] Kerosene

[ ] Own electric generator [ ] Rechargeable battery

[ ] Other (Specify ___________________________________)

8. Main source of power for cooking [ ] Wood [ ] Electricity

[ ] Gas [ ] Other

9. Ownership of home appliances [ ] Television [ ] Refrigerator [ ] Air conditioner

[ ] Radio/cassette [ ] Microwave [ ] Washing machine

[ ] Telephone [ ] DVD/CD Player

[ ] Oven/stove

[ ] Electric fan [ ] Computer

10. Ownership of means of transportation [ ] Bicycle [ ] Motorbike [ ] Car

Owned [ ] [ ] [ ]

Credit not yet paid off [ ] [ ] [ ]

[ ] Truck [ ] Other (Specify _________________________)

Owned [ ] [ ]

Credit not yet paid off [ ] [ ]


March 2018


C. ACCESS TO COMMUNITY/SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Distance from home in kilometers

Primary School

Secondary School

Health Center/Clinic

Mosque/Church

Market

D. ACCESS TO WORKPLACE

Distance from home in kilometers

Workplace (mention____________________________________)



E. PRESENT CONDITION OF AFFECTED FAMILY

1. For what has the compensation money been used? [ ] [ ] [ ]

2. Overall, how is the situation of your family now, compared tobefore?

[ ] better [ ] same [ ] worse

3. In case worse, what is the problem you are facing? [ ] [ ] [ ]

4. Does your family still need assistance from the Project or theLocal Government?

[ ] No

Notes:

1. Code of AH should be the same as the code used in the October 2017 SES

2. Take photographs of the house, facilities (water, electricity, etc), and interview to visualize the report.

3. Objective apart from data collection: to be able to provide a sketch of the social life of the AHs.

Signature of interviewer Signature of respondent


March 2018

Indonesia Australia Partnership for Infrastructure (KIAT) XIII-1

II. Annex 2: Updated Profiles of Individual AHs (March 2018)

III. General notedown early April 2018. PT. Zeinit is in the process of establishing a new plant some 20 km from its present

location. The owner informed the project verbally in October 2017, after the compensation payments were

effectuated. This move of the factory may impact some of the Affected Households, but is not related to the

implementation of the Project

IV. PAF No : 01

V. Basic Information of HH Head Name: KHUSNUN Sex: Male

Present place of residence: Perumahan Gria Putri Gading Cempaka No. G-2, Jalan Irigasi, Kelurahan Sukamulya,

Kecamatan Sematang Borang (± 7-8 km from WWTP site).

Marital Status: Married Physical condition: Normal

scheme), Pak Khusnun built some additional rooms for his family.

Compensation money was used for: (i) Building additional rooms including land filling (about 40 million IDR); (ii) Paying

XIII. Socio-economic Profile of HH


March 2018

Indonesia Australia Partnership for Infrastructure (KIAT) C-2

Total no of people in house: 6 No of HHs in main HH: 1

Information of people who are living in the house:

HH member Age (years) Sex Occupation Remarks

Khusnun 60 Male Factory worker PT. Zeinit (wood)

50 Female Small shop owner Selling basic foods in Zienit area

Daughter*) 26 Female Factory worker In Tangerang

Daughter 21 Female Student Univ. (on going)

Daughter 19 Female Student Univ. (on going)

Grandson 2 Male -

Family income/month**): Rp. 4,600,000 Family expenses/month: Rp. 5,177,000

Per-capita income/month: Rp. 766,667 (above the Palembang City poverty line-2017, Rp. 480,735)

Sanitation

Drinking water source: Refilled water

(gallon) Clean (washing/bathing) water

source:

Dug well

(temporary)

Toilet facility: Latrine/WC with septic tank Bathing facility: Privately owned inside house

Garbage disposal management: Disposed of at TPS (temporary disposal site)

Lighting and Cooking fuel

Lighting: PLN Cooking fuel:

Home appliances and transportation means owned

Home appliances: TV; Fan; Refrigerator; Mobile phone; DVD/CD player; Laptop; Washing machine

Transportation means: Bicycle; Motorcycle (3)

LXXXI. Note:

LXXXII. *) family ID card.

LXXXIII. **) -pay again since Zenith factory is also decreasing their business to be removed to their new land, while his wife business is also decreased. - to be checked against 2017 data.

LXXXIV. Access to Public Facilities (distance to) Primary schools: 5 km High Schools: 3 km Health facility:

(Puskesmas/clinic)

5 km

Mosque: 1 km Market: 5 km

XCVI. Access to Working Place(s) Zeinit Djaya (wood mill): 7-8 km Other(s): None


March 2018

Indonesia Australia Partnership for Infrastructure (KIAT) CVII-3

CI. Current Condition of Impacted HH Overall current condition compared to before: Better off (more peaceful)

If getting worse off, what problems faced: -

Further assistances needed from LG and/or Project: Yes, needed in form of (i) soft loan to open new small shop and/or

livestock (if possible); (ii) to be involved in the Project as construction worker.

CV. No more problems related to the Project.

CVII.


March 2018

Indonesia Australia Partnership for Infrastructure (KIAT) CLXXIV-4

CVIII. PAF No : 02

CIX. Basic Information of HH Head Name: IWAN ADRIANTO Sex: Male

Present place of residence Lives in a rented house (for 1 year) in Jalan Harapan Jaya I, Lorong Sebelas Bersaudara, No. 44,

RT. 31/RW. 08, Kelurahan Sei Selayur (± 2 km from WWTP site).

Marital Status: Married Physical condition: Normal

Status

km away from WWTP location) and has started to build a new house for his family there (on 10 x 15 m2 land). The land

transaction is recognized under the Notary deed.

Compensation money used for: (i) Bought land (150 m2) and built foundation) only (58 million IDR); (ii) Paying rented

needs.

CXVII. Socio-economic Profile of HH Total no of people in house: 4 No of HHs in main HH: 1

Information of people who are living in house:

HH member Age (years) Sex Occupation Remarks

Iwan 42 Male No permanent work

(occasional labor)

Resigned from PT. Zeinit (wood

mill)

41 Female Housewife (None)

Son 11 Male Student Grade 5 SD

Daughter 8 Female Student Grade 3 SD

Family income/month: Rp. 1,500,000 Family expenses/month: Rp. 2,675,000

Per-capita income/month: Rp. 375.000 (below the Palembang City poverty line-2017, Rp. 480,735)

Sanitation

Drinking water source: Refilled water Clean (washing/bathing) water source: PDAM

Toilet facility: Latri

social safeguards and involuntary resettlement monitoring ... · rukun tetangga, neighbourhood vthe...

Documents