sociolinguistics seminar series english section anne fabricius
TRANSCRIPT
Structure of today’s seminarDiscussion of the readingsA sociolinguistic understanding of language
in society: some principles to be aware ofWhat does the field encompass?Who are the major authorsStudying Varieties of English for the
Language Project: how to do it at RUC?
Wolfram and Schilling-Estes paperA discussion of popular or folk notions of
language, dialect, accent and deconstruction of them
Presenting also how sociolinguists understand these terms
Role of Language variation in identity construction: what we as members of a speech community understand on the basis of the sounds around us.
In-group and out-group realisations
Some examplesEnglish ’no’Danish ’meget’This knowledge of our local speech variety
and others we come into contact with is the result of membership of a community
(Quantitative) sociolinguistic methodThe structured sociolinguistic interviewNew York City 1961-2, publ Labov 1966
*sample on CD
Set new standards for ’Urban dialectology’ following the dialectology tradition ultimately going back to the Grimm Brothers and German Romanticism
The standard/non-standard continuumStandard/ non-standard a very salient folk
category many English speaking countriesIs in fact a continuum that is somewhat
subjective in placing a dividing line between the two
Certain grammar and pronunciation features can be particularly salient and therefore stand as sharp demarcators of language varieties
Can think of langauges in the individual as statistical composites of features and aggregated styles
The distinctionsFormal standard: written-language based
and extensively codified and often conservative
Informal standard: applied to spoken language and with multiple acceptable norms, avoids socially stigmatised structures
Vernacular: spoken language, investigated by access to speakers usage patterns, non-codifed
Why study dialects/language variation?Language variation as an academic curiosity!Language is inherently variable according to
context (use) and speaker (users), so it permeates language use constantly
Language is an everyday social miracle that is worth understanding and respecting
Social justice issues /education /discriminationUltimately it can tell us things about how
languages change around us; variation becomes change in progress as the social profile of its users change, community norms change
Eg RP spoken in the 1930s....
Coupland’s PaperArgues that the performance of Welshness
here is an example that takes us beyond Labov’s claim that style (language according to use) was related to ’how much attention was paid to speech’ in his original interviews, and that style could be one dimensional…
Coupland emphasises style as performance, as a process of ’doing’
What do you think of this way of understanding how speakers make use of their linguistic repertiore (constantly in development up to age of adulthood..perhaps even longer)
Instead…Dialect can be used consciously in
performance genres like light radio entertainment, to ’play around’ with what it means to be Welsh
We can’t just assume that people performing different voices are being ’authentic’ spekaers, which is what classic sociolinguistics has done (set up interviews with subjects chosen to fit social characteristics and taken the speech at ’face value’)
Two sides of the coin ....
So…Coupland sees dialect as a semiotic
ressource, for making meaning of linguistic and sociolinguistic types
Stylisation is therefore a social practice that seen from the view of the actors themselves is done to say things about the speaker.
Ultimately social-constructivist
As essential to late modernity…A practice becoming more and more
widespread along with reflexivity in post modern culture
Encompasses fundamental shifts in how we orient to social group identities and memberships
Partly a result of globalisation and mobility on a hitherto unexperienced scale
A late modern symbolic practiceSee GOAT and FACE examples
Some principles of empirical sociolinguisticsAdopts social science methods of
accountability to dataIs empirical and deductive(is reliant on real data in the same way as
CDA, and all the disciplines we talk about in this seminar series)
Uses both qualitative and quantitative methodsUses ethnographic information and
sociological paradigms (thus socio-)Employs (largely) structuralist tools of
linguistics analysis
Some principles of empirical sociolinguisticsFocusses on diversity and variation in
language use for different social groups (subcultures, ethnicities, societies, nations, genders, ages, occupational groups, city locations)
Since every speaker has a complex history and identity, the person’s history and social context must be taken into account
Overall, sociolinguistics aims to explain and situate language variation through the linguistic and social context
Who are the major authors in quantitative sociolinguistics?US: William Labov, Gillian Sankoff, Shana
Poplack, Peter Trudgill, Walt Wolfram, Jack Chambers, Barbara Horvath, Ron Macauley, Penny Eckert…
UK: Paul Kerswill, Jenny Cheshire, Jane Stuart-Smith, Sali Tagliamonte, Dominic Watt, Paul Foulkes, Gerry Docherty, Miriam Meyerhoff…
LANCHART centre, Cop. Uni
Who are the major authors in qualitative sociolinguistics?US and UK Ben Rampton, Celia Roberts,
Nikolas Coupland, Adam Jaworski, Barbara Johnstone, Allan Bell, Bent Preisler
Also milieus at Copenhagen University (J Normann Jørgensen)
CALPIU
Major JournalsLanguage and SocietyJournal of SociolinguisticsEnglish World wideLanguage Variation and ChangeLanguage AwarenessJournal of Pragmatics
Some books from AF’s collectionHandbook of Language Variation and ChangeSociolinguisticsUrban VoicesWells’ Accents of English…
Challenges for doing projects in this areaA knowledge of phonetics/morphology and
interest in itinterest in variation and variabilityFinding suitable data (tv, internet, film
dvds)Finding sociolinguistically-informed
descriptions of the relevant varietiesFinding the meanings and attitudes
determining variationFinding the mechanisms governing
variation in performance