special considerations for clinical trials in the

73
Special Considerations for Clinical Trials in the Paediatric Population Psychosocial, Medicinal, Scientific, and Organizational Challenges Reinhard Feneberg Paediatric Unit KKS Heidelberg

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jan-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Special Considerations for Clinical Trialsin the Paediatric Population

Psychosocial, Medicinal, Scientific,and Organizational Challenges

Reinhard FenebergPaediatric Unit

KKS Heidelberg

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 2

• PsychosocialObtaining informed consent and educating motivated patients

• MedicinalDevelopment and growth

• ScientificSmall and diverse populations

• OrganizationalLarge, multinational, long running studies

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 3

• PsychosocialObtaining informed consent and educating motivated patients

• MedicinalDevelopment and growth

• ScientificSmall and diverse populations

• OrganizationalLarge, multinational, long running studies

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 4

The best wayto give advice to your children isto find out what they want andthen advise them to do it

(H. S. Truman)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 5

• Psychological• Legal• Ethical

• ... Child‘s perspective

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 6

Development of Children

• School age: Ability to understandexplanations regarding own body, medication, studies (immense increaseof understanding in the first years in school)

• Different theoretical approaches:– Theory of cognitive development (Piaget)– Information psychology

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 7

Cognitive development (Piaget)

sensorimotor

preoperational

concrete operations

formal operations

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 8

Aspects of information psychology

• Piaget:rough classification, but:

• Children developknowledge in conjunctionwith their experiences

• Example: Chronically illchildren

• Development depends as well on availableinformation!

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 9

Influences on Development

• Social rank• Intelligence• Previous experience (e.g., history of illness)• Relationship with parents• Information• Diseases• Peer group• etc.

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 10

Aspects of Capability for Consent

• Criteria according to Coester– Maturity– Power of judgement– Critical faculties– Freedom of choice

• Situational aspects (Fegert 2000)– Psychopathology– Experience of chronically ill children

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 11

Aspects of Capability for Consent

• Effects on capability for consent– Adapted approach for checking capability for

consent– Information adapted to stage of disease

• Effects on compliance– Without informed consent:

– little compliance, cooperation, and collaboration– little chances for reliable and valid data

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 12

The Need to Participate

• Need to participate increases with age• < 14 yrs: others should decide most frequent• > 14 yrs: desire to participate most frequent• Participation is important – not the actual decision• Consideration of participation needs has positive long

term effects on therapy motivation• (Wiethoff et al. 2002)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 13

Voice effect

• Opportunity to participate in decisionmaking process raises the perceivedfairness, even if there is no control of the final decision

• The right to a say leads to higheracceptance and commitment to consequences of the decision

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 14

Asymmetries

• Gradient of knowledge: physician, parents, child• Considerable responsibility of parents

– Attention after separation and joint custody: (Informedconsent MUST be signed by both legal custodians)

• Role conflict of physician: „objective researcher“ vs. „considerate caretaker“

• And: Dependencies in hospital hierarchy

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 15

Conflicts of interest

• Parents are interested in the very best treatment of their child and do not want to endanger a trustful relationship with theirphysician

• Children are often anxious and need specificinformation about the course of the study and age adapted information concerningfundamental questions

• Conflict of interest between parents and children possible (e.g., maladjustment)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 16

A little bit exaggerated ...

• Parents seem to be becomingincreasingly reluctang to enrolltheir children in basic researchwith no perceivable immediate benefit (Appelbaum et al. ACT 2003)

• Informed Consent, ein kinderfeindliches Konzept? (Rothärmel et al. Medizinrecht 2000)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 17

Consent and Assent

• Consent of parents always along with assentof child

• Specific information for children:– development– requirements of study– specific for disease („expert“ knowledge of

chronically ill children)– Legal and ethical aspects, in particular veto

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 18

Mac CAT Interview

• Grisso and Applebaum 1998

• Qualitative interview to assess ability forconsent and assent

• Ethical: helpful for the decision aboutinclusion of patient

• Legal: documentation of capability fordecision of patient

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 19

General Problems

• General ethical obligation to protect minors

• Fundamental problem:

In contrast to adults, minors may not providelegally binding consent

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 20

Right to a say of the child?

• Therefore:Consent of parents or legal guardians necessary

• Consent (or non-consent) has to consider the child‘spresumed will

• The minor has to receive information according to his/her developmental status by persons withpedagogical experience

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 21

„Legal“ Age Groups

• Consent– > 18 yrs. (full legal age)– > 12 - 15 yrs. ability to decide independently

• Assent– EU: defined by EC– AAP: > 7 yrs.

• Dissent– 5 - 7 yrs.

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 22

Documentation Problems ...

• Documentation of assent?

• Participants of appropriate intellectualmaturity should personally sign and date either a separately designed written assentform or the written informed consent ...

• (ICH Topic E11: Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products in the PaediatricPopulation)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 23

How to to interprete and document?

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 24

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 25

ICH E 11, 2.6.3.

• Although a participant‘s wish to withdraw froma study must be respected, there may becircumstances in therapeutic studies forserious or life-threatening diseases in which, in the opinion of the investigator and parents(s)/legal guardian, the welfare of a pediatric patient would be jeopardized by his or her failing to participate in the study.

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 26

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 27

ICH E 11, 2.6.3.• In this situation, continued parental

(legal guardian) consent should besufficient to allow participation in thestudy.

Adults and minors- double standards???

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 28

Verständnis und Consent

• Does informedconsent to research requirecomprehension?(Sreenivasan G, Lancet 2003, 362:2016-2018)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 29

The View of the PersonsConcerned

• Why do children participate in clinicalstudies?

• Hope to receive improved treatment (52%)• Altruism (38%)• Financial incentives (51%)• Recommendation of others (44%)

• (Niles, ACT 2003)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 30

The View of the PersonsConcerned

Satisfaction Again?

„much betterthan expected“

63% „definitelyconsider“

49%

„somewhatbetter than exp.“

6% „maybeconsider“

25%

„as good asexpected“

20% „definitely notconsider“

19%

„somewhatworse as exp.“

0% „don’t know“ 7%

„don’t know“ 11%

Niles, ACT 2003

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 31

• PsychosocialObtaining informed consent and educating motivated patients

• MedicinalDevelopment and growth

• ScientificSmall and diverse populations

• OrganizationalLarge, multinational, long running studies

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 32

If you bungle raising your children,I don‘t thinkwhatever else you do wellmatters very much

(Anonymous)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 33

Efficacy of drugs is influenced by different developmental stages:

•anatomical•physiological•biochemical•behavioural

charakteristics

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 34

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 35

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 36

Physiology (I)

• Maturation of brain, persistent fetal circulation

• (Relatively) large body surface area• High percentage of body water• Immature blood brain barrier• Narrow respiratory tract• Immune system

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 37

Physiology (II)

GI tractLower motilityProlonged gastric passagehigher gastric pH

Plasma proteinsfetal albumin

higher percentage of body water(> 75% in children, 50-55% in adults)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 38

Maturation of CYP in Liver

< 30 weeks

> 30 weeks< 24 hours

1-7 days8-28 days

1-3 months3-12 months

> 1 yearadults

3A7 2D6 2E1 3A4

2C8 / 9 / 18 / 19 1A2

(Cresteil T.; Food Addit Contam 1998)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 39

Maturation of Renal Function

Max. tubuläre PAH- Sekretionskapazität(mg/min/1.73 m²)

(modifiziert nach Boreus LO; 1982)

Nierengewicht

GFR (mL/min/1.73 m²)

12 y

ears

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

neon

ate

2 m

o

6 m

o8

mo

9 ye

ars

3 ye

ars

adul

ts

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 40

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 41

PharmacokineticsLiberation (L ADME)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 42

PharmacokineticsAbsorption ( LADME)

(Gladtke E; Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 1979)

Sulfisomidin - concentration vs time

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 43

Basal and stimulated secretion of gastric acid

(Stewart CF and Hampton EM; Clin Pharm 1987)

basal secretion

stimulated secretion(pentagastrin)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 44

PharmacokineticsDistribution ( LADME)

(Friis-Hansen B; Pediatrics 1961)

Extracellular fluid compartments

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 45

PharmacokineticsMetabolismus ( LADME)

reduced hepatic metabolic capacity

•Enzymes of oxidative metabolism:t1/2 of diazepampreterm: 80-400 h, children: ˜ 12 h

•Glucuronisation

alternative metabolic pathways

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 46

PharmacokineticsExkretion ( LADME)

Reduced renal elimination

– lower GFR in newborns– e.g., t1/2 of penicillin prolonged

– development of tubular secretion

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 47

Endpoints

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 48

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 49

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 50

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 51

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 52

• PsychosocialObtaining informed consent and educating motivated patients

• MedicinalDevelopment and growth

• ScientificSmall and diverse populations

• OrganizationalLarge, multinational, long running studies

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 53

Never have ideas about children –and never have ideas for them

(D. H. Lawrence)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 54

Death Rates by Age

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 55

Cancer:Age distribution

of deaths

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 56

Onset of Diabetes

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 57

Hypertension by AgeWhat is Missing?

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 58

But:

• 1% – 10% of all pediatric patients suffer fromhigh blood pressure

• only 10% of these correctly diagnosed

• Consequences (??)Up to now, no approval for anyantihypertensive agent for children in Germany

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 59

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 60

Variation of Half Life

0

2

4

6

Tolbut

amid

Carba

maz

epin

Pheny

toin

Theop

hyllin

Diazep

amPhe

nylbu

tazo

n

Adults Children Newborn

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 61

Dilemma

• Many pediatric participants for clinicalstudies required– 5 different age groups (ICH E 11)

– Higher variability

• Fewer patients available

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 62

www.paed-net.org

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 63

• PsychosocialObtaining informed consent and educating motivated patients

• MedicinalDevelopment and growth

• ScientificSmall and diverse populations

• OrganizationalLarge, multinational, long running studies

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 64

Large organizationis loose organization.Nay, it would be almost as true to saythat organization isalways disorganization.

(G. K. Chesterton)

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 65

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 66

Epidemiology:Overweight

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 67

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 68

% lactose intolerant

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 69

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 70

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 71

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 72

Reinhard Feneberg – DGRA 2007 Bonn 73

Thank you!