special education (pk-8) early childhood ed...

64
SPECIAL EDUCATION (PK-8) / EARLY CHILDHOOD ED (PK-4) Student Teaching Handbook Revised August 2020 Department of Exceptionality Programs College of Education Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania 1

Upload: others

Post on 23-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • SPECIAL EDUCATION (PK-8) / EARLY CHILDHOOD ED (PK-4)Student Teaching Handbook

    Revised August 2020Department of Exceptionality Programs

    College of Education Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania

    Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania

    1

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS

    THE STUDENT TEACHER CONTRACT ASSIGNMENTS ............................................................... 3-6

    FAMILY INTRODUCTION LETTER/VIDEO ................................................................................................................................. 3 CLASS SCHEDULE .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 INDUCTION INFORMATION CHECKLIST ................................................................................................................................... 3 PLACEMENT OVERVIEW AND TAKEOVER SCHEDULE ......................................................................................................... 3 PROFESSIONAL OBSERVATION .................................................................................................................................................. 3 SUPPLEMENTARY TEACHING TOOL .......................................................................................................................................... 4 VIDEO LESSON AND REFLECTION ............................................................................................................................................. 4 LEARNING CENTER ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 LESSON PLANNING ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4

    Daily Accountability ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Formal Lesson Plans (coinciding with formal observations) ................................................................................... 4 Formal Lesson Plan Self-Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 5

    UNIT PLANS ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Unit Plan Assignment and Self-Assessment .............................................................................................................. 5 Family Communication: Unit Plan Preview or Summary ........................................................................................ 5

    LESSON PLAN & UNIT PLAN COLLABORATION FORMS ....................................................................................................... 5 INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION PLAN ...................................................................................................................... 6 IEP ASSIGNMENT AND REFLECTION PAPER ON IEP PROCESS EXPERIENCE.................................................................... 6 STUDENT TEACHING BINDER/PORTFOLIO .............................................................................................................................. 6

    GUIDELINES FOR STUDENT TEACHING EVALUATION ............................................................... 7

    STUDENT TEACHER CONTRACT ASSIGNMENT GUIDE ............................................................... 8

    STUDENT TEACHING GRADING & SELF-REFLECTION RUBRIC .......................................... 9-12

    ABSENCES/TARDINESS ..........................................................................................................................13

    VIRTUAL/REMOTE INSTRUCTION RESPONSIBLITIES ................................................................13

    SUBSTITUTE TEACHING POLICY .......................................................................................................14

    APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................................15

    A. PENNSYLVANIA’S CODE OF CONDUCT AND PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE FOR EDUCATORS .................... 16-17 B. COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN (CEC)’S INITIAL PREPARATION STANDARDS .......................... 18-21 C. DAILY SCHEDULE MODEL .............................................................................................................................................. 22 D. INDUCTION INFORMATION CHECKLIST................................................................................................................ 23-25 E. PLACEMENT OVERVIEW AND TAKEOVER SCHEDULE ............................................................................................ 26 F. SUPPLEMENTARY TEACHING TOOL ............................................................................................................................ 27 G. LEARNING CENTER .......................................................................................................................................................... 28 H. LESSON PLAN ASSIGNMENT RESOURCES ............................................................................................................ 29-38

    Assignment Overview .................................................................................................................................... 29 Lesson Plan Template-Blank ......................................................................................................................... 30 Lesson Plan Template- Annotated ............................................................................................................ 31-32 Verification of Collaboration Form- Lesson Plan ......................................................................................... 33 Scoring Rubric for Special Education Lesson Plans ................................................................................ 34-38

    I. DIRECTIONS FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT OF COE AND UNIT PLANS .......................................................................... 39 J. ELEMENTS OF A PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE ............................................................................................................ 40 K. REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY ACTION VERBS RESOURCE ............................................................................... 41 L. WEBB’S DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE LEVELS ................................................................................................................. 42 M. UNIT PLAN ASSIGNMENT RESOURCES .................................................................................................................. 43-51

    Unit Plan Format ..................................................................................................................................... 43-44 Assignment Overview and Directions ....................................................................................................... 45-46 Verification of Collaboration Form- Unit Plan ............................................................................................. 47 Scoring Rubric for Special Education Unit Plan ...................................................................................... 48-51

    N. INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION PLAN ................................................................................................... 52-54 O. IEP ASSIGNMENT ........................................................................................................................................................ 55-61

    Assignment Overview and Directions ....................................................................................................... 55-56 IEP Assignment Rubric............................................................................................................................. 57-61

    P. FORMAL CLASSROOM OBSERVATION FORM ...................................................................................................... 62-63 Q. HELPFUL WEB RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................................ 64

    2

  • The Student Teacher Contract

    The Student Teacher Contract is divided into the early childhood placement and the special education placement assignments. See syllabus and contract rubric for point values related to each assignment, as well as due dates. The university supervisor will discuss this contract with the cooperating teacher and the student teacher, so a mutual understanding is reached. Assignments may be modified depending on the nature of the classroom, student needs, and cooperating teacher recommendations.

    Required Assignments for BOTH Placements

    #1 #2

    Introduction Letter or Video to FamiliesA letter of introduction, or an introduction video, will be provided to families during the first week of the placement. This letter or video must be pre-approved by the cooperating teacher prior to being sent out (or posted online) and should be professional in appearance, error free in spelling/grammar, and written/narrated in a family-friendly tone.

    Class Schedule The daily classroom schedule should include the following: the detailed schedule for the teacher/students for the day (all periods/subjects) and arrival/dismissal times. Additionally, the student teacher needs to provide any in-service days scheduled during their placement or days school will be closed (e.g., holidays); check the district calendar and/or website for these. Appendix C is an example of a daily schedule for a learning support classroom, and a template will also be provided on BOLT.

    Induction Information Checklist Included in Appendix D is an Induction Information Checklist. The student teacher is to inventory all the applicable components and record each component as being completed or NA for their setting. In addition to checking off completed items, "evidence" via informal comments or notes on the checklist should be documented. This form is to assist the student teacher in becoming aware of the school’s environment, policies and procedures as well as facilitate communication between the cooperating teacher and the student teacher. See BOLT for an electronic template, if needed.

    Placement Overview and Takeover Schedule In the placement overview assignment, the student teacher will detail district-level, building-level, and classroom-level characteristics. Research on the district website or PDE's Future Ready PA Index (https://futurereadypa.org/) and discussions with district personnel may assist the student teacher in locating the proper information. Lastly, the final part of this assignment involves providing a detailed outline of the Takeover Schedule by including the increasing teaching responsibilities assigned each week. See Appendix E for more details about assignment requirements and sample schedule.

    Professional Observation Student teachers are required to observe at least one professional staff member other than the cooperating teacher. This may include but is not limited to: other classroom teachers, related service providers, guidance counselors, behavior intervention specialists, parent meetings. A typed summary should include: date, title of professional, location, time period observed, detailed description of observed activities, student responses and the student teacher’s reactions to the observation.

    __ __

    __ __

    __ __

    __ __

    __ __

    3

    https://futurereadypa.org/

  • Supplementary Teaching ToolUsually several interactive teaching tools/resources are created and implemented during each student teaching placement to supplement instruction either face-to-face or virtually. The objective is for the student teacher to make something to support a concept being taught. The student teacher should also evaluate the impact on student learning. See Appendix F for assignment components..

    Video Lesson & Reflection The student teacher will record a lesson of their choice, and must first secure advance permission from the cooperating teacher of which lesson may be filmed in accordance with parent permissions. Then the student teacher will complete the Classroom Practices Video Analysis Guided Reflection Tool activity located on BOLT, where they will select a minimum of a 15 minute segment of the lesson where active engagement with students is evident to aid in the analysis of effective, evidence-based teaching practices. The video will not be submitted electronically, but should be kept until the assignment is graded in case the supervisor would like to conference with the student teacher while viewing the video together. The video should be deleted at the end of the placement.

    Learning CenterThe student teacher will design and implement a learning center. Learning centers provide students with exciting and interesting experiences to practice, enrich, reteach or enhance their learning. See Appendix G for more details about this assignment.

    Lesson Plans Daily Accountability: The student teacher will develop and submit regular written lesson plans in the required format and following the agreed upon the timeline set by the cooperating teacher and the university supervisor. Daily written lesson plans are required for both student teaching placements, and the format and submission process will be agreed upon by the cooperating teacher and supervisor. Lesson plans are developed for all subject areas the student teacher gains responsibility for as directed by the Takeover Schedule developed. Lesson plans/sub plans are required when the student teacher is absent, as well. Typically, the student teacher adopts the same method of lesson planning that their cooperating teacher uses. In the event that a cooperating teacher does not have a specific format for planning, the student teacher will utilize one of the templates provided on BOLT.

    At minimum, according to the COE Student Teaching Handbook, “All daily plans must be given to the cooperating teacher three days prior to instruction or at the designation of the host district. The student teacher will have lesson plans available for the university supervisor at all times (via the Portfolio/Notebook). The plans must be signed and dated by the cooperating teacher verifying approval.” Evidence of daily planning will be evaluated by the supervisor during each visit through a binder check.

    Formal Lesson Plans: Formal plans following the Formal Lesson Plan Template are required at a minimum for formal observations (submitted at least 24 hr prior to an observation via BOLT) and the Unit Plans. This formality is subject to change dependent upon additional support needed for a given student teacher. Formal lesson plans include a pre-post assessment as well as a written post-lesson reflection on student performance/data and overall lesson reflections. The university supervisor will provide feedback on formal plans submitted and feedback is expected to be implemented into future lesson planning.

    Appendix H includes the lesson plan format. Be sure to CAREFULLY read through all required components.

    __ __

    __ __

    __ __

    __ __

    __ __

    4

  • Formal Lesson Plan Self-AssessmentDuring each placement, the student teacher will select one"best showcase" lesson plan from either of the formal observations to submit for a grade. This lesson plan should be modified from its original submission to integrate feedback received. See Appendix I for Directions for Self-Assessment of the COE Lesson Plans and Unit Plans.

    Unit Plan Assignments & Self-AssessmentsAn instructional unit will be developed, taught and evaluated by the student teacher in each placement following the COE Unit Plan Template (see also Appendix M in this handbook). The student teacher in collaboration with the cooperating teacher will choose a unit topic based on the academic and/or social needs of the students in their classroom. The unit should be comprised of 3-5 lessons, each following the BU COE Lesson Plan Template (e.g., each lesson including a pre-post assessment as well as post-reflection components) and will include an overall unit pre-post assessment as well as unit post-reflection components.

    Directions for planning your lesson and unit plans are in your COE Student Teaching Handbook, Appendix D and Appendix E, respectively. Included are the “Scoring Rubric for Lesson Plans” and the “Scoring Rubric for Unit Plans” which contain the elements and rubrics for each one. Use the rubrics to guide you when planning your lesson or unit and in analyzing student learning (after implementation). Review the rubrics thoroughly and identify what expectation you plan to achieve: “Meets Expectations” or “Exceeds Expectations” for each element. It is crucial that you “Meet Expectations” on all elements but we anticipate that you will strive to “Exceed Expectations.” See Appendix I for Directions for Self-Assessment of the COE Lesson Plans and Unit Plans.

    Unit Plan Family Communication: Preview or SummaryFamilies will be provided communication in written form (letter or web-based posting) with either a detailed preview of the unit the student teacher will be engaging their learners in or a summary of the unit upon its conclusion. The letter or posting should be pre-approved by the cooperating teacher before being sent to families, in addition to professional in appearance (attractive/creative, error free in spelling/grammar, and written in a family-friendly language and tone).

    Lesson Plan and Unit Plan Collaboration FormsCollaboration with professionals will be documented via regular signatures on the Lesson Plan (See Appendix H) and Unit Plan (See Appendix M) "Verification of Collaboration" Forms. For daily lesson planning and weekly planning meetings, weekly signatures should be documented (at a minimum, 6 cooperating teacher signatures) and for unit planning, a minimum of 3-4 meetings/signatures should be collected to document initial planning discussions, assessment development, and lesson plan approval/review.

    __ __

    __ __

    __ __

    __ __

    5

  • IEP Assignment & Reflection Paper on IEP Process ExperienceDevelopment of an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is a requirement for all student teachers. A student should be chosen in collaboration with the cooperating teacher by the end of the second week of the placement. If possible, a student should be selected on the basis of an IEP due date or the arrival of a new student. The student teacher is responsible, when warranted, for assessing the student with formal or informal measures used by the cooperating teacher or selected by the student teacher. The IEP format utilized by the cooperating teacher is acceptable. (See current blank format and annotated IEP documents available on the PATTAN website for reference: https://www.pattan.net/forms/ as required by IDEIA-P.L. 108-466) All components of the IEP need to be completed as per regulations. See specific directions/rubric for IEP assignment following IEP document in Appendix O. Ideally, the student teacher should also participate in the IEP meeting upon parent consent.

    In addition to submitting the actual IEP document (with student name redacted throughout entire document), the student teacher will reflect upon their participation in the IEP process in a detailed written paper. Discussion points should include the student teacher's involvement/insight in: IEP process-related paperwork, administration of assessments to guide IEP development, collaboration with other professionals, special factors that influence IEP development, writing of the IEP, and participation in the IEP meeting.

    Student Teaching Binder/Portfolio

    Each student teacher should purchase a large, three-ring binder for the purpose of organizing the materials necessary for student teaching. The binder should be professional-looking in nature, well-organized and include all documents provided, the lesson plans developed (daily planning as well as formal plans/unit plans created), assignments completed, seminar information, hard copies of BOTH student teaching handbooks, etc. The university supervisor and cooperating teacher will find it beneficial to see how the student teacher organizes and retrieves materials, develops concepts, teaches and reflects upon their instruction. The items in the binder will serve as evidence of final evaluation assessment components being met for each placement. This should be readily available for review at any time during your student teaching experience, including each time the university supervisor visits.

    Updated August 2020

    Additional Required Assignment for ONLY Special Education Placement

    __ __

    Additional Required Assignment for ONLY Early Childhood Education Placement

    Individual Behavior Intervention Plan After consultation with their cooperating teacher, the student teacher will choose a student whose behavior is presenting challenges within the classroom (as determined by assessment data collected) and develop an individualized behavior intervention plan for the student. The selected student should not yet be identified as a student who has an IEP for behavior challenges. District protocol should be followed for obtaining parental permission for this assignment, as needed. This assignment should be started during the 2nd week of the placement. See Appendix N for more details.

    __ __

    6

  • Guidelines for Student Teacher Evaluation

    Evaluator Evaluation Completed as Part of Additional Details Student Teacher COE Formal Lesson Observation

    Form Scheduled formal observations (a minimum of 2 per placement)

    1. No grade is assigned for a formal observation.The university supervisor will complete theform and share it with both the studentteacher and cooperating teacher. Feedbackprovided is expected to be implemented at the next visit. Feedback and ability to adjust future practice will be integrated into scores on the Student Teaching Grading & Self-Evaluation Rubric and PDE 430.

    Student Teacher Contract Assignments

    Ongoing Formative Assessments University Supervisor scores assignments and provides feedback

    Student Teaching Grading & Self-Reflection Rubric

    1. Mid-Placement Self-Reflection Activity

    2. Final Placement Conference

    1. Discussed with supervisor during a formalobservation

    2. University Supervisor uses to help inform finalStudent Teaching Grading Rubric score

    CPAST Rubric Final Placement Conference Completed by student teacher and brought to final placement conference to lead discussion

    Pennsylvania Department of Education Form 430 (PDE 430)

    End of Placement Certification Recommendation for the COE Dean’s Office (done by University Supervisor)

    Completed by University Supervisor, signed by student teacher, & submitted to Dean’s Office for certification

    Cooperating Teacher

    Student Teaching Grading & Self-Reflection Rubric

    Final Placement Conference Provided to University Supervisor to help inform final placement grade

    CPAST Rubric Final Placement Conference Completed by cooperating teacher and brought to final placement conference to share

    (Special Education Placement only) Bloomsburg University Department of Exceptionality Programs Special Education Scoring Rubric

    Final Placement Conference Completed by cooperating teacher and brought to final placement conference

    Note: Assessment documents can be accessed on BOLT and through the links above. The CPAST document can only be accessed through BOLT or provided directly from the university supervisor and is only approved for internal use by student teachers, university supervisors, and cooperating teachers. The University Supervisor grades all student teaching assignments and provides assignment and ongoing performance feedback to the student teacher. Additionally, they utilize the formative and summative assessments completed by the student teacher and cooperating teacher when assigning each final student teaching placement grade, as well as to inform the recommendation for teacher certification through the PDE 430.

    Student Teacher Contract Assignments

    Formal Lesson Observations (min of 2 per placement)

    Ongoing Formative

    Assessments

    Student Teaching Grading & Self-Reflection Rubric

    Mid-Point Assessment

    • Student Teaching Grading & Self-Reflection Rubric

    • Candidate Preservice Assessment of Student Teaching (CPAST) Rubric

    • Pennsylvania Department of Education Form 430

    • Bloomsburg University Department of Exceptionality ProgramsSpecial Education Scoring Rubric

    End of Placement

    Assessments

    7

  • Fall

    20

    20

    Stu

    de

    nt

    Teac

    her

    Co

    ntr

    act

    Ass

    ign

    me

    nt

    Gu

    ide

    Nam

    e:

    Sem

    est

    er:

    Su

    pe

    rvis

    or:

    SPEC

    ED 4

    88/5

    88

    P

    lace

    me

    nt

    1

    Dat

    es:

    8/1

    8/2

    02

    0 -

    10

    /6/2

    02

    0

    Sem

    inar

    D

    ue

    Dat

    e:

    Po

    int

    Val

    ue

    : Ea

    rne

    d

    Sco

    re:

    SPEC

    ED 4

    89/5

    89

    P

    lace

    me

    nt

    2

    Dat

    es:

    10

    /7/2

    02

    0 -

    11

    /24

    /20

    20

    Sem

    inar

    D

    ue

    Dat

    e:

    Po

    int

    Val

    ue

    : Ea

    rne

    d

    Sco

    re:

    Intr

    od

    uct

    ion

    Let

    ter/

    Vid

    eo (t

    o f

    amili

    es)

    Sem

    inar

    1

    2

    Intr

    od

    uct

    ion

    Let

    ter/

    Vid

    eo (t

    o f

    amili

    es)

    YMH

    FA

    Sess

    ion

    #1

    2

    Cla

    ssro

    om

    Sch

    edu

    le

    Sem

    inar

    1

    1

    Cla

    ssro

    om

    Sch

    edu

    le

    YMH

    FA

    Sess

    ion

    #1

    1

    Ind

    uct

    ion

    Info

    rmat

    ion

    Ch

    eckl

    ist

    Sem

    inar

    1

    1

    Ind

    uct

    ion

    Info

    rmat

    ion

    Ch

    eckl

    ist

    YMH

    FA

    Sess

    ion

    #1

    1

    Pla

    cem

    ent

    Ove

    rvie

    w &

    Tak

    eove

    r Sc

    hed

    ule

    Se

    min

    ar 2

    4

    P

    lace

    men

    t O

    verv

    iew

    & T

    akeo

    ver

    Sch

    edu

    le

    YMH

    FA

    Sess

    ion

    #1

    4

    Pro

    fess

    ion

    al O

    bse

    rvat

    ion

    Se

    min

    ar 2

    2

    P

    rofe

    ssio

    nal

    Ob

    serv

    atio

    n

    Sem

    inar

    6

    2

    Sup

    ple

    men

    tal T

    each

    ing

    Too

    l Se

    min

    ar 3

    4

    Su

    pp

    lem

    enta

    l Tea

    chin

    g To

    ol

    Sem

    inar

    6

    4

    Vid

    eo-r

    eco

    rded

    Le

    sso

    n &

    Re

    flec

    tio

    n

    Sem

    inar

    3

    5

    Vid

    eo-r

    eco

    rded

    Le

    sso

    n &

    Re

    flec

    tio

    n

    Sem

    inar

    7

    5

    Lear

    nin

    g C

    ente

    r Se

    min

    ar 3

    4

    Le

    arn

    ing

    Cen

    ter

    Sem

    inar

    7

    4

    Un

    it P

    lan

    & S

    elf-

    Ass

    ess

    men

    t (f

    ollo

    w C

    OE

    rub

    ric)

    Sem

    inar

    4

    22

    U

    nit

    Pla

    n &

    Sel

    f-A

    sse

    ssm

    ent

    (fo

    llow

    CO

    E ru

    bri

    c)Se

    min

    ar 8

    2

    2

    Fam

    ily C

    om

    mu

    nic

    atio

    n-

    Un

    it P

    revi

    ew o

    r Su

    mm

    ary

    Sem

    inar

    4

    2

    Fam

    ily C

    om

    mu

    nic

    atio

    n-

    Un

    it P

    revi

    ew o

    r Su

    mm

    ary

    Sem

    inar

    8

    2

    Less

    on

    Pla

    nn

    ing-

    dai

    ly a

    cco

    un

    tab

    ility

    Se

    min

    ar 4

    5

    Le

    sso

    n P

    lan

    nin

    g- d

    aily

    acc

    ou

    nta

    bili

    ty

    Sem

    inar

    8

    5

    Less

    on

    Pla

    n &

    Un

    it P

    lan

    Co

    llab

    ora

    tio

    n F

    orm

    s Se

    min

    ar 4

    4

    (2

    pts

    / fo

    rm)

    Less

    on

    Pla

    n &

    Un

    it P

    lan

    Co

    llab

    ora

    tio

    n F

    orm

    s Se

    min

    ar 8

    4

    (2

    pts

    / fo

    rm)

    Form

    al L

    ess

    on

    Pla

    n &

    Sel

    f-A

    sses

    smen

    t (f

    ollo

    wC

    OE

    Ru

    bri

    c)

    Sem

    inar

    4

    13

    Fo

    rmal

    Le

    sso

    n P

    lan

    & S

    elf-

    Ass

    essm

    ent

    (fo

    llow

    CO

    ER

    ub

    ric)

    Se

    min

    ar 8

    1

    3

    Earl

    y C

    hild

    ho

    od

    Ed

    Pla

    cem

    en

    t:

    Earl

    y C

    hild

    ho

    od

    Ed

    Pla

    cem

    en

    t:

    Ind

    ivid

    ual

    Beh

    avio

    r In

    terv

    enti

    on

    Pla

    n

    Sem

    inar

    4

    12

    In

    div

    idu

    al B

    ehav

    ior

    Inte

    rven

    tio

    n P

    lan

    Se

    min

    ar 8

    1

    2

    Spe

    cial

    Ed

    uca

    tio

    n P

    lace

    me

    nt:

    Sp

    eci

    al E

    du

    cati

    on

    Pla

    cem

    en

    t:

    IEP

    & R

    efle

    ctio

    n N

    arra

    tive

    on

    IEP

    Pro

    cess

    Se

    min

    ar 4

    1

    2

    IEP

    & R

    efle

    ctio

    n N

    arra

    tive

    on

    IEP

    Pro

    cess

    Se

    min

    ar 8

    1

    2

    Stu

    de

    nt

    Teac

    hin

    g G

    rad

    ing/

    Self

    -Re

    fle

    ctio

    n R

    ub

    ric

    60

    S

    tud

    en

    t Te

    ach

    ing

    Gra

    din

    g/Se

    lf-R

    efl

    ecti

    on

    Ru

    bri

    c 6

    0

    TO

    TAL

    _

    ___

    ___

    /__

    ___

    __

    TOTA

    L

    __

    ___

    __/_

    ___

    ___

    Stu

    den

    t Te

    ach

    ing

    Ass

    ign

    men

    ts G

    rad

    ing

    Scal

    e b

    y P

    erc

    enta

    ge

    A: 9

    4-1

    00

    B

    +: 8

    7-8

    9 C

    +: 7

    7-7

    9 D

    +: 6

    7-6

    9

    Tota

    l Po

    ints

    Ear

    ned

    (P

    lace

    me

    nt

    1 +

    Pla

    cem

    en

    t 2

    )-

    / A

    -: 9

    0-9

    3 B

    : 84

    -86

    C: 7

    4-7

    6 D

    : 60

    -66

    B

    -: 8

    0-8

    3 C

    -: 7

    0-7

    3 E

    (fai

    ling)

    : bel

    ow

    60

    8

  • Bloo

    msb

    urg

    Uni

    vers

    ity D

    epar

    tmen

    t of E

    xcep

    tiona

    lity

    Prog

    ram

    s

    Stud

    ent T

    each

    ing

    Gra

    ding

    & S

    elf-R

    efle

    ctio

    n Ru

    bric

    Stud

    ent:

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    _ Co

    oper

    atin

    g Te

    ache

    r: __

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    __

    Uni

    vers

    ity S

    uper

    viso

    r: __

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    Da

    te: _

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    ____

    _

    PLAN

    NIN

    G A

    ND

    PREP

    ARAT

    ION

    Di

    stin

    guis

    hed

    (3)

    Prof

    icie

    nt (2

    ) Ba

    sic

    (1)

    Uns

    atis

    fact

    ory

    (0)

    Less

    on p

    lans

    are

    subm

    itted

    in

    a tim

    ely

    man

    ner u

    sing

    agr

    eed

    upon

    form

    at.

    All p

    lans

    are

    subm

    itted

    in

    the

    agre

    ed u

    pon

    form

    at

    and

    timel

    ines

    .

    Mos

    t pla

    ns (8

    5% o

    r mor

    e)

    are

    subm

    itted

    in th

    e ag

    reed

    up

    on fo

    rmat

    and

    tim

    elin

    es.

    Plan

    s are

    inco

    nsist

    ently

    su

    bmitt

    ed u

    sing

    the

    agre

    ed

    upon

    form

    at a

    nd ti

    mel

    ines

    .

    Plan

    s are

    not

    subm

    itted

    in

    the

    agre

    ed u

    pon

    form

    at a

    nd

    timel

    ine.

    Le

    sson

    s are

    diff

    eren

    tiate

    d to

    m

    eet n

    eeds

    of l

    earn

    ers.

    Al

    l pla

    ns a

    re d

    iffer

    entia

    ted

    to m

    eet n

    eeds

    of l

    earn

    ers.

    Mos

    t pla

    ns (8

    5% o

    r mor

    e)

    are

    diffe

    rent

    iate

    d to

    mee

    t ne

    eds o

    f lea

    rner

    s.

    Som

    e pl

    ans (

    abou

    t 50%

    ) ar

    e di

    ffere

    ntia

    ted

    to m

    eet

    the

    need

    s of l

    earn

    ers.

    Plan

    s do

    not r

    efle

    ct m

    uch,

    if

    any,

    diff

    eren

    tiatio

    n.

    Mat

    eria

    ls a

    re p

    repa

    red

    for

    inst

    ruct

    ion.

    Al

    l mat

    eria

    ls ar

    e pr

    epar

    ed

    for i

    nstr

    uctio

    n.

    Mos

    t of t

    he ti

    me

    (85%

    or

    mor

    e) m

    ater

    ials

    are

    prep

    ared

    for i

    nstr

    uctio

    n.

    Som

    e of

    the

    time

    mat

    eria

    ls ar

    e pr

    epar

    ed fo

    r in

    stru

    ctio

    n (in

    cons

    isten

    t pr

    epar

    atio

    n is

    evid

    ent)

    .

    Mat

    eria

    ls ar

    e ha

    rdly

    eve

    r pr

    epar

    ed fo

    r ins

    truc

    tion;

    fr

    eque

    nt d

    isorg

    aniza

    tion

    is ev

    iden

    t. De

    mon

    stra

    tes k

    now

    ledg

    e of

    co

    nten

    t and

    ped

    agog

    y.

    All l

    esso

    n pl

    ans r

    efle

    cted

    ac

    cura

    te c

    onte

    nt a

    nd

    effe

    ctiv

    e in

    stru

    ctio

    nal

    met

    hods

    .

    Mos

    t les

    son

    plan

    s (85

    % o

    r m

    ore)

    refle

    cted

    acc

    urat

    e co

    nten

    t and

    effe

    ctiv

    e in

    stru

    ctio

    nal m

    etho

    ds.

    Som

    e le

    sson

    pla

    ns (a

    bout

    50

    %) r

    efle

    cted

    acc

    urat

    e co

    nten

    t and

    effe

    ctiv

    e in

    stru

    ctio

    nal m

    etho

    ds.

    Less

    on p

    lans

    did

    not

    refle

    ct

    accu

    rate

    con

    tent

    and

    ef

    fect

    ive

    inst

    ruct

    iona

    l m

    etho

    ds.

    Util

    ized

    cla

    ssro

    om re

    sour

    ces.

    Cl

    assr

    oom

    reso

    urce

    s wer

    e co

    nsist

    ently

    util

    ized.

    Cl

    assr

    oom

    reso

    urce

    s wer

    e ut

    ilize

    d m

    ost o

    f the

    tim

    e (8

    5% o

    r mor

    e).

    Clas

    sroo

    m re

    sour

    ces w

    ere

    som

    etim

    es u

    tilize

    d (a

    bout

    50

    % o

    f the

    tim

    e).

    Clas

    sroo

    m re

    sour

    ces w

    ere

    bare

    ly, i

    f at a

    ll, u

    tilize

    d.

    9

  • CLAS

    SRO

    OM

    EN

    VIRO

    NM

    ENT

    Dist

    ingu

    ishe

    d (3

    ) Pr

    ofic

    ient

    (2)

    Basi

    c (1

    ) U

    nsat

    isfa

    ctor

    y (0

    )

    Inte

    ract

    ions

    are

    resp

    ectf

    ul

    and

    genu

    ine

    with

    stud

    ents

    . Al

    l int

    erac

    tions

    with

    st

    uden

    ts w

    ere

    resp

    ectf

    ul

    and

    genu

    ine.

    Mos

    t int

    erac

    tions

    (at l

    east

    85

    % o

    f the

    tim

    e) w

    ith

    stud

    ents

    wer

    e re

    spec

    tful

    an

    d ge

    nuin

    e.

    Som

    e in

    tera

    ctio

    ns (a

    bout

    50

    % o

    f the

    tim

    e) w

    ith

    stud

    ents

    wer

    e re

    spec

    tful

    an

    d ge

    nuin

    e.

    Inte

    ract

    ions

    with

    stud

    ents

    w

    ere

    not r

    espe

    ctfu

    l and

    ge

    nuin

    e.

    Dem

    onst

    rate

    s cla

    ssro

    om

    man

    agem

    ent s

    trat

    egie

    s.

    Cons

    isten

    tly u

    tilize

    d ef

    fect

    ive

    clas

    sroo

    m

    man

    agem

    ent s

    trat

    egie

    s.

    Mos

    t cla

    ssro

    om

    man

    agem

    ent s

    trat

    egie

    s w

    ere

    effe

    ctiv

    e (a

    t lea

    st 8

    0%

    of th

    e da

    y).

    Som

    e cl

    assr

    oom

    m

    anag

    emen

    t str

    ateg

    ies

    wer

    e ef

    fect

    ive

    (abo

    ut 5

    0%

    of th

    e da

    y).

    Clas

    sroo

    m m

    anag

    emen

    t st

    rate

    gies

    wer

    e no

    t ef

    fect

    ive.

    Mon

    itors

    and

    resp

    onds

    to

    stud

    ent b

    ehav

    ior.

    Activ

    ely

    man

    aged

    stud

    ent

    beha

    vior

    s con

    siste

    ntly

    . M

    ost o

    f the

    tim

    e st

    uden

    t be

    havi

    ors w

    ere

    man

    aged

    co

    nsist

    ently

    (at l

    east

    85%

    of

    the

    day)

    .

    Som

    e of

    the

    time

    stud

    ent

    beha

    vior

    s wer

    e m

    anag

    ed

    cons

    isten

    tly (a

    bout

    50%

    of

    the

    day)

    .

    Stud

    ent b

    ehav

    iors

    wer

    e no

    t m

    anag

    ed c

    onsis

    tent

    ly.

    Man

    ages

    tran

    sitio

    ns

    smoo

    thly

    with

    min

    imal

    loss

    of

    inst

    ruct

    iona

    l tim

    e.

    All t

    rans

    ition

    s wer

    e m

    anag

    ed e

    ffect

    ivel

    y.

    Mos

    t tra

    nsiti

    ons w

    ere

    man

    aged

    effe

    ctiv

    ely

    (abo

    ut

    85%

    of t

    rans

    ition

    s eac

    h da

    y).

    Som

    e tr

    ansit

    ions

    wer

    e m

    anag

    ed e

    ffect

    ivel

    y (a

    bout

    50

    % o

    f tra

    nsiti

    ons e

    ach

    day)

    .

    Tran

    sitio

    ns w

    ere

    not

    man

    aged

    effe

    ctiv

    ely.

    Crea

    tes a

    safe

    lear

    ning

    en

    viro

    nmen

    t. A

    safe

    lear

    ning

    en

    viro

    nmen

    t was

    m

    aint

    aine

    d at

    all

    times

    .

    A sa

    fe le

    arni

    ng e

    nviro

    nmen

    t w

    as m

    aint

    aine

    d at

    mos

    t of

    the

    time

    (at l

    east

    85%

    of t

    he

    day)

    .

    A sa

    fe le

    arni

    ng

    envi

    ronm

    ent w

    as

    mai

    ntai

    ned

    som

    e of

    the

    time

    (at l

    east

    50%

    of t

    he

    day)

    .

    A sa

    fe le

    arni

    ng e

    nviro

    nmen

    t w

    as n

    ot c

    onsis

    tent

    ly

    mai

    ntai

    ned.

    INST

    RUCT

    ION

    Di

    stin

    guis

    hed

    (3)

    Prof

    icie

    nt (2

    ) Ba

    sic

    (1)

    Uns

    atis

    fact

    ory

    (0)

    Inst

    ruct

    ion

    is d

    eliv

    ered

    sm

    ooth

    ly, a

    ccur

    atel

    y an

    d as

    pe

    r les

    son

    plan

    .

    Inst

    ruct

    ion

    was

    alw

    ays

    accu

    rate

    ly d

    eliv

    ered

    and

    al

    igne

    d to

    the

    less

    on p

    lan.

    Inst

    ruct

    ion

    was

    acc

    urat

    ely

    deliv

    ered

    and

    alig

    ned

    to th

    e le

    sson

    pla

    n m

    ost o

    f the

    tim

    e (a

    t lea

    st 8

    5%).

    Inst

    ruct

    ion

    was

    acc

    urat

    ely

    deliv

    ered

    and

    alig

    ned

    to

    the

    less

    on p

    lan

    som

    e of

    the

    time

    (abo

    ut 5

    0%).

    Inst

    ruct

    ion

    was

    not

    ac

    cura

    tely

    del

    iver

    ed a

    nd/o

    r al

    igne

    d to

    the

    less

    on p

    lan

    Use

    s a v

    arie

    ty o

    f mat

    eria

    ls,

    activ

    ities

    and

    met

    hods

    . In

    stru

    ctio

    n w

    as

    diffe

    rent

    iate

    d to

    kee

    p al

    l st

    uden

    ts e

    ngag

    ed.

    Inst

    ruct

    ion

    was

    di

    ffere

    ntia

    ted

    mos

    t of t

    he

    time

    to k

    eep

    mos

    t stu

    dent

    s (a

    t lea

    st 8

    5%) e

    ngag

    ed.

    Inst

    ruct

    ion

    was

    di

    ffere

    ntia

    ted

    som

    e of

    the

    time

    to k

    eep

    som

    e of

    the

    stud

    ents

    (abo

    ut 5

    0%)

    enga

    ged.

    Inst

    ruct

    ion

    was

    not

    di

    ffere

    ntia

    ted

    and

    stud

    ent

    enga

    gem

    ent w

    as n

    ot

    cons

    isten

    t.

    10

  • Tech

    nolo

    gy is

    util

    ized

    . Te

    chno

    logy

    was

    effe

    ctiv

    ely

    utili

    zed

    whe

    n ap

    prop

    riate

    . Te

    chno

    logy

    was

    effe

    ctiv

    ely

    utili

    zed

    mos

    t of t

    he ti

    me

    whe

    n ap

    prop

    riate

    .

    Tech

    nolo

    gy w

    as e

    ffect

    ivel

    y ut

    ilize

    d so

    me

    of th

    e tim

    e w

    hen

    appr

    opria

    te (i

    .e.,

    not

    cons

    isten

    tly).

    Tech

    nolo

    gy w

    as n

    ot

    effe

    ctiv

    ely

    utili

    zed.

    Chec

    ks fo

    r und

    erst

    andi

    ng

    durin

    g le

    sson

    . Co

    nsist

    ently

    che

    cked

    for

    unde

    rsta

    ndin

    g du

    ring

    inst

    ruct

    ion

    and

    was

    co

    ntin

    uous

    ly a

    war

    e of

    st

    uden

    t pro

    gres

    s.

    Cons

    isten

    tly c

    heck

    ed fo

    r un

    ders

    tand

    ing

    to e

    nsur

    e st

    uden

    t lea

    rnin

    g, b

    ut a

    few

    m

    issed

    opp

    ortu

    nitie

    s wer

    e ev

    iden

    t.

    Chec

    ked

    for u

    nder

    stan

    ding

    so

    me

    of th

    e tim

    e du

    ring

    inst

    ruct

    ion

    and

    wer

    e in

    cons

    isten

    tly a

    war

    e of

    st

    uden

    t pro

    gres

    s.

    Oft

    en fa

    iled

    to c

    heck

    for

    unde

    rsta

    ndin

    g du

    ring

    inst

    ruct

    ion

    and

    wer

    e no

    t aw

    are

    of st

    uden

    t pro

    gres

    s th

    roug

    hout

    the

    less

    on.

    Form

    ativ

    e an

    d su

    mm

    ativ

    e as

    sess

    men

    t dat

    a gu

    ides

    in

    stru

    ctio

    n.

    Cons

    isten

    tly u

    tilize

    d da

    ta

    to g

    uide

    inst

    ruct

    ion.

    U

    tilize

    d da

    ta m

    ost o

    f the

    tim

    e to

    gui

    de in

    stru

    ctio

    n.

    Inco

    nsist

    ently

    util

    ized

    data

    to

    gui

    de in

    stru

    ctio

    n.

    Did

    not u

    se d

    ata

    to g

    uide

    in

    stru

    ctio

    n.

    PRO

    FESS

    ION

    AL

    RESP

    ON

    SIBI

    LITI

    ES

    Dist

    ingu

    ishe

    d (3

    ) Pr

    ofic

    ient

    (2)

    Basi

    c (1

    ) U

    nsat

    isfa

    ctor

    y (0

    )

    Prof

    essi

    onal

    in a

    ppea

    ranc

    e an

    d de

    mea

    nor.

    Alw

    ays p

    rofe

    ssio

    nal i

    n ap

    pear

    ance

    and

    dem

    eano

    r. M

    ost o

    f the

    tim

    e w

    as

    prof

    essio

    nal i

    n ap

    pear

    ance

    an

    d de

    mea

    nor (

    85%

    of t

    he

    time)

    .

    Som

    e of

    the

    time

    was

    pr

    ofes

    siona

    l in

    appe

    aran

    ce

    and

    dem

    eano

    r (ab

    out 5

    0%

    of th

    e tim

    e).

    Not

    con

    siste

    ntly

    pr

    ofes

    siona

    l in

    appe

    aran

    ce

    and

    dem

    eano

    r. Fr

    eque

    ntly

    sp

    oken

    to a

    bout

    this

    and

    faile

    d to

    mod

    ify.

    Atte

    nds d

    aily

    , arr

    ivin

    g an

    d de

    part

    ing

    as p

    er re

    quire

    d sc

    hedu

    le.

    Atte

    nded

    dai

    ly a

    nd a

    lway

    s ad

    here

    d to

    the

    requ

    ired

    sche

    dule

    .

    Was

    in a

    tten

    danc

    e m

    ost o

    f th

    e tim

    e an

    d ad

    here

    d to

    the

    requ

    ired

    sche

    dule

    (onl

    y ac

    crue

    d 1-

    2 ex

    cuse

    d ab

    senc

    es).

    Atte

    nded

    mos

    t of t

    he ti

    me

    and

    inco

    nsist

    ently

    adh

    ered

    to

    the

    requ

    ired

    sche

    dule

    (2

    -3 e

    xcus

    ed a

    bsen

    ces;

    in

    cons

    isten

    tly a

    dher

    ed to

    ar

    rival

    /dep

    artu

    re ti

    mes

    ).

    Atte

    ndan

    ce, a

    nd/o

    r arr

    ival

    an

    d de

    part

    ure

    time

    was

    not

    co

    nsist

    ent.

    Follo

    ws r

    ules

    and

    pol

    icie

    s of

    the

    loca

    l edu

    catio

    n ag

    ency

    . Co

    nsist

    ently

    follo

    wed

    the

    rule

    d an

    d po

    lices

    of t

    he

    LEA.

    Follo

    wed

    the

    rule

    s and

    po

    lices

    of t

    he L

    EA m

    ost o

    f th

    e tim

    e (a

    t lea

    st 8

    5%).

    Follo

    wed

    the

    rule

    s and

    po

    licie

    s of t

    he L

    EA so

    me

    of

    the

    time

    (abo

    ut 5

    0%).

    Did

    not c

    onsis

    tent

    ly fo

    llow

    th

    e ru

    les a

    nd p

    olic

    es o

    f the

    LE

    A.

    Wel

    com

    es a

    nd se

    eks o

    ut

    feed

    back

    . Al

    way

    s rec

    eptiv

    e to

    fe

    edba

    ck.

    Rece

    ptiv

    e to

    feed

    back

    mos

    t of

    the

    time

    (i.e.

    , act

    ivel

    y lis

    tene

    d, p

    rofe

    ssio

    nal i

    n di

    scus

    sions

    , eag

    er to

    im

    prov

    e be

    havi

    or).

    Rece

    ptiv

    e to

    feed

    back

    so

    me

    of th

    e tim

    e (i.

    e.,

    min

    imal

    ly

    inte

    rest

    ed/e

    ngag

    ed,

    sligh

    tly d

    efen

    sive,

    slig

    htly

    un

    prof

    essio

    nal)

    Not

    rece

    ptiv

    e to

    feed

    back

    (i.

    e., v

    ery

    defe

    nsiv

    e,

    argu

    men

    tativ

    e, o

    r un

    prof

    essio

    nal).

    11

  • Use

    s sel

    f-ref

    lect

    ion

    to

    impr

    ove

    skill

    s.

    Util

    ized

    feed

    back

    and

    self-

    refle

    ctio

    n to

    impr

    ove

    skill

    s.

    Util

    ized

    feed

    back

    and

    self-

    refle

    ctio

    n to

    impr

    ove

    skill

    s m

    ost o

    f the

    tim

    e (a

    t lea

    st

    85%

    ).

    Util

    ized

    feed

    back

    and

    self-

    refle

    ctio

    n to

    impr

    ove

    skill

    s so

    me

    of th

    e tim

    e (a

    bout

    50

    %).

    Did

    not u

    tilize

    feed

    back

    and

    se

    lf-re

    flect

    ion

    to im

    prov

    e sk

    ills.

    Colu

    mn

    Tota

    ls:

    Fina

    l Sco

    re-

    ___

    ____

    / 60

    Gra

    ding

    Sca

    le:

    50-6

    0=A

    30-3

    4=C+

    46-4

    9 =A

    -25

    -29=

    C

    43-4

    5=B+

    20-2

    4=C-

    39-4

    2=B

    15-1

    9=D

    35-3

    8=B-

    Belo

    w 1

    5=F

    12

  • Absences/Tardiness

    Attendance and participation in all activities at the school site are required, including faculty meetings, in-service days, and instructional planning time. Student teachers are expected to follow the schedules for the school district to which they are assigned. Student teachers have the same working hours as their cooperating teacher. Tardiness on the part of the student teacher is not acceptable, and responsibilities of student teachers to part-time work or university extracurricular activities should not interfere with the student teaching responsibilities. Student teachers should not leave the school building before the close of the scheduled day. In the event of an absence, student teachers must notify both their cooperating teacher and their supervisor prior to 6:30 a.m. Official documentation must be provided in the event of an absence due to an extreme circumstance (e.g., significant illness, military service, immediate family emergency). Absences may be required to be made up at the semester’s end as per the discretion of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor. As per the COE Student Teaching Handbook section Professional Responsibilities of the Student Teacher, “Excessive absences, depending on the reason, may be made up at a time specified by the university supervisor with the agreement of the cooperating teacher. Excessive absence is defined as more than three days in an assignment.” Sub plans must be left with the cooperating teacher in advance of an absence.

    Attendance and participation at regularly scheduled Student Teaching Seminar dates are also required. Active participation is expected at each seminar meeting, and student teachers should come prepared (and on time) to engage in thoughtful discussion/reflection with peers and supervisors. See syllabus and BOLT for seminar dates and formats/locations (e.g., face-to-face on campus or virtual via Zoom).

    Virtual/Remote Instruction Responsibilities

    Student teachers are expected to provide instruction to students through the same methods as is expected of their cooperating teacher by the school district. This may include face-to-face, hybrid, or virtual formats, and may shift throughout a placement given state or district mandates. It is highly recommended that student teachers take part in any training and/or professional development opportunities provided within the district or externally to prepare themselves to meet placement expectations and provide high-quality instruction to their students. Student teachers should also familiarize themselves with the learning management system (LMS) utilized by their school, as well as any other technologies or web-based platforms supported by the district.

    13

  • Substitute Teaching Policy August 6, 2019

    Dear Cooperating Teachers and School District Administrators:

    The College of Education (COE) at Bloomsburg University is grateful for our continued partnership and appreciate you accepting our students for a variety of experiences including but not limited to observations, practicums, internships, and student teaching. We also are cognizant of the difficulty our partnering school districts have in finding substitute teachers and at times want to use student teachers to ‘cover’ classes when substitutes are unavailable. In an effort to assist in building capacity for your district, the COE has adopted the following requirement for those districts who want to employ Bloomsburg University student teachers as substitutes:

    1. The school district administration will discuss the opportunity or possibility of the student teacherserving as a substitute teacher with the cooperating teacher and student teacher early during theplacement and start the necessary process for district substitute employment if all are in agreement.

    2. The student teacher must be approved by the local school district for substitute status.3. The student teacher must have gained a minimum of 12 weeks of classroom experience with his/her

    cooperating teacher.4. The student teacher, cooperating teacher, and university supervisor must be in agreement

    (documented by email correspondence) that the student is ready to handle the responsibility ofsubstituting.

    5. The student can only be employed as a substitute for the classes assigned during student teaching.6. The cooperating teacher will notify the university supervisor when the student teacher is being

    employed as a substitute in a timely fashion (i.e., prior to the day, if possible).7. The student teacher cannot be employed as a substitute for more than 3 consecutive days in the

    classroom without a cooperating teacher and without prior approval from the Dean of the COE.8. The student teacher will be employed and compensated substitute wages by the school district for

    his/her services for the day(s) the student teacher serves as a substitute teacher.

    In the event of extenuating circumstances communication with the university supervisor should occur immediately then follow-up through the Dean of the COE.

    These guidelines have been established not as a means to encourage employing student teachers as substitutes as they are still novice in their development as educators, but to assist school districts in providing the best possible education for their students when employees are absent.

    Any feedback on the guidelines and procedures outlined above should be sent directly to Dr. Darlene Perner, Interim Dean of the COE at [email protected] or 570-389-4075. We wish you the best for a smooth opening and a productive and successful 2019-20 school year.

    Sincerely,

    Darlene E. Perner Interim Dean, College of Education

    14

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Appendices

    15

  • PENNSYLVANIA'S CODE OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE

    AND CONDUCT FOR EDUCATORS

    Section 1. Mission The Professional Standards and Practices Commission is committed to providing leadership for improving the quality of education in this Commonwealth by establishing high standards for preparation, certification, practice and ethical conduct in the teaching profession.

    Section 2. Introduction (a) Professional conduct definesinteractions between the individualeducator and students, the employingagencies and other professionals.Generally, the responsibility forprofessional conduct rests with theindividual professional educator. However,in this Commonwealth, a Code ofProfessional Practice and Conduct (Code)for certificated educators is required bystatute and violation of specified sectionsof the Code may constitute a basis forpublic or private reprimand. Violations ofthe Code may also be used as supportingevidence, though may not constitute anindependent basis, for the suspension orrevocation of a certificate. TheProfessional Standards and PracticesCommission (PSPC) was charged by theact of December 12, 1973 (P. L. 397, No.

    141) (24 P. S. § § 12-1251—12-1268),known as the Teacher Certification Law,with adopting a Code by July 1, 1991. See24 P. S. § 12-1255(a)(10).(b) This chapter makes explicit the valuesof the education profession. Whenindividuals become educators in thisCommonwealth, they make a moralcommitment to uphold these values.

    Section 3. Purpose (a) Professional educators in thisCommonwealth believe that the quality of their services directly influences the Nation and its citizens. Professional educators recognize their obligation to provide services and to conduct themselves in a manner which places the highest esteem on human rights and dignity. Professional educators seek to ensure that every student receives the highest quality of service and that every professional maintains a high level of competence from entry through ongoing professional development. Professional educators are responsible for the development of sound educational policy and obligated to implement that policy and its programs to the public. (b) Professional educators recognize theirprimary responsibility to the student andthe development of the student’s potential.Central to that development is theprofessional educator’s valuing the worthand dignity of every person, student andcolleague alike; the pursuit of truth;devotion to excellence; acquisition ofknowledge; and democratic principles. To

    those ends, the educator engages in continuing professional development and keeps current with research and technology. Educators encourage and support the use of resources that best serve the interests and needs of students. Within the context of professional excellence, the educator and student together explore the challenge and the

    dignity of the human experience.

    Section 4. Practices (a) Professional practices are behaviorsand attitudes that are based on a set ofvalues that the professional educationcommunity believes and accepts. Thesevalues are evidenced by the professionaleducator’s conduct toward students andcolleagues, and the educator’s employerand community. When teacher candidatesbecome professional educators in thisCommonwealth, they are expected toabide by this section.(b) Professional educators are expectedto abide by the following:(1) Professional educators shall abide bythe Public School Code of 1949 (24 P. S.§ § 1-101—27-2702), other school laws ofthe Commonwealth, sections 1201(a)(1),(2) and (4) and (b)(1), (2) and (4) of thePublic Employe Relations Act (43 P. S. §§ 1101.1201(a)(1), (2) and (4) and (b)(1), (2) and (4)) and this chapter.(2) Professional educators shall beprepared, and legally certified, in theirareas of assignment. Educators may notbe assigned or willingly acceptassignments they are not certified to fulfill.

    Educators may be assigned to or accept assignments outside their certification area on a temporary, short-term, emergency basis. Examples: a teacher certified in English filling in a class period for a physical education teacher who has that day become ill; a substitute teacher certified in elementary education employed as a librarian for several days until the district can locate and employ a permanent substitute teacher certified in library science. (3) Professional educators shall maintainhigh levels of competence throughouttheir careers.(4) Professional educators shall exhibitconsistent and equitable treatment ofstudents, fellow educators and parents.They shall respect the civil rights of all andnot discriminate on the basis of race,national or ethnic origin, culture, religion,sex or sexual orientation, marital status,age, political beliefs, socioeconomicstatus, disabling condition or vocationalinterest. This list of bases ordiscrimination is not all-inclusive.(5) Professional educators shall acceptthe value of diversity in educationalpractice. Diversity requires educators tohave a range of methodologies and torequest the necessary tools for effectiveteaching and learning.(6) Professional educators shall impart totheir students principles of goodcitizenship and societal responsibility.(7) Professional educators shall exhibitacceptable and professional language andcommunication skills. Their verbal and

    Appendix A

    16

  • written communications with parents, students and staff shall reflect sensitivity to the fundamental human rights of dignity, privacy and respect. (8) Professional educators shall be open-minded, knowledgeable and useappropriate judgment and communicationskills when responding to an issue withinthe educational environment.(9) Professional educators shall keep inconfidence information obtained inconfidence in the course of professionalservice unless required to be disclosed bylaw or by clear and compellingprofessional necessity as determined bythe professional educator.(10) Professional educators shall exertreasonable effort to protect the studentfrom conditions which interfere withlearning or are harmful to the student’shealth and safety.

    Section 5. Conduct Individual professional conduct reflects upon the practices, values, integrity and reputation of the profession. Violation of § § 235.6—235.11 may constitute an independent basis for private or public reprimand, and may be used as supporting evidence in cases of certification suspension and revocation.

    Section 6. Legal obligations (a) The professional educator may not

    engage in conduct prohibited by theact of December 12, 1973 (P. L. 397,No. 141) (24 P. S. § § 12-1251—12-

    1268), known as the Teacher Certification Law.

    (b) The professional educator may notengage in conduct prohibited by:

    (1) The Public School Code of 1949 (24 P.S. § § 1-101—27-2702) and other lawsrelating to the schools or the education ofchildren.(2) The applicable laws of theCommonwealth establishing ethics ofpublic officials and public employes,including the act of October 4, 1978 (P. L.883, No. 170) (65 P. S. § § 401—413),known as the Public Official andEmployee Ethics Law.(c) Violation of subsection (b) shall havebeen found to exist by an agency ofproper jurisdiction to be considered anindependent basis for discipline.

    Section 7. Certification The professional educator may not: (1) Accept employment, when not properlycertificated, in a position for whichcertification is required.(2) Assist entry into or continuance in theeducation profession of an unqualifiedperson.(3) Employ, or recommend foremployment, a person who is notcertificated appropriately for the position.

    Section 8. Civil Rights The professional educator may not: (1) Discriminate on the basis of race,National or ethnic origin, culture, religion,sex or sexual orientation, marital status,age, political beliefs, socioeconomic

    status; disabling condition or vocational interest against a student or fellow professional. This list of bases of discrimination is not all-inclusive. This discrimination shall be found to exist by an agency of proper jurisdiction to be considered an independent basis for discipline. (2) Interfere with a student’s orcolleague’s exercise of political and civilrights and responsibilities.

    Section 9. Improper personal or financial gain The professional educator may not: (1) Accept gratuities, gifts or favors thatmight impair or appear to impairprofessional judgment.(2) Exploit a professional relationship forpersonal gain or advantage.

    Section 10. Relationships with students The professional educator may not: (1) Knowingly and intentionally distort ormisrepresent evaluations of students.(2) Knowingly and intentionallymisrepresent subject matter or curriculum.(3) Sexually harass or engage in sexualrelationships with students.(4) Knowingly and intentionally withholdevidence from the proper authorities aboutviolations of the legal obligations asdefined within this section.

    Section 11. Professional relationships The professional educator may not: (1) Knowingly and intentionally deny orimpede a colleague in the exercise orenjoyment of a professional right orprivilege in being an educator.(2) Knowingly and intentionally distortevaluations of colleagues.(3) Sexually harass a fellow employe.(4) Use coercive means or promisespecial treatment to influence professionaldecisions of colleagues.(5) Threaten, coerce or discriminateagainst a colleague who in good faithreports or discloses to a governing agencyactual or suspected violations of law,agency regulations or standards.

    The Code of Professional Practice and

    Conduct for Educators can be found at 22

    Pa. Code §§235.1 - 235.11.

    All questions should be directed to the Professional Standards and Practices

    Commission at (717) 787-6576.

    17

    http:235.6�235.11

  • Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What Every Special Educator Must Know: Professional Ethics and Standards. Arlington, VA: CEC 1

    Initial Preparation Standard 2: Learning Environments2.0 Beginning special education professionals create safe, inclusive, culturally

    responsive learning environments so that individuals with exceptionalities become active and effective learners and develop emotional well being, positive social interactions, and self-determination.

    Key Elements2.1 Beginning special education professionals, through collaboration with general

    educators and other colleagues, create safe, inclusive, culturally responsive learning environments to engage individuals with exceptionalities in meaningful learning activities and social interactions.

    2.2 Beginning special education professionals use motivational and instructional interventions to teach individuals with exceptionalities how to adapt to different environments.

    2.3 Beginning special education professionals know how to intervene safely and appropriately with individuals with exceptionalities in crisis.

    Initial Preparation Standard 1: Learner Development and Individual Learning Differences1.0 Beginning special education professionals understand how exceptionalities may

    interact with development and learning and use this knowledge to provide meaningful and challenging learning experiences for individuals with exceptionalities.

    Key Elements1.1 Beginning special education professionals understand how language, culture, and

    family background influence the learning of individuals with exceptionalities.1.2 Beginning special education professionals use understanding of development and

    individual differences to respond to the needs of individuals with exceptionalities.

    Initial Preparation Standards

    Appendix B

    18

  • Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What Every Special Educator Must Know: Professional Ethics and Standards. Arlington, VA: CEC 2

    Initial Preparation Standard 3: Curricular Content Knowledge3.0 Beginning special education professionals use knowledge of general and specialized

    curricula to individualize learning for individuals with exceptionalities.Key Elements3.1 Beginning special education professionals understand the central concepts,

    structures of the discipline, and tools of inquiry of the content areas they teach, and can organize this knowledge, integrate cross-disciplinary skills, and develop meaningful learning progressions for individuals with exceptionalities.

    3.2 Beginning special education professionals understand and use general and specialized content knowledge for teaching across curricular content areas to individualize learning for individuals with exceptionalities.

    3.3 Beginning special education professionals modify general and specialized curricula to make them accessible to individuals with exceptionalities.

    Initial Preparation Standard 4: Assessment4.0 Beginning special education professionals use multiple methods of assessment

    and data sources in making educational decisions.Key Elements4.1 Beginning special education professionals select and use technically sound formal

    and informal assessments that minimize bias.4.2 Beginning special education professionals use knowledge of measurement

    principles and practices to interpret assessment results and guide educational decisions for individuals with exceptionalities.

    4.3 Beginning special education professionals, in collaboration with colleagues and families, use multiple types of assessment information in making decisions about individuals with exceptionalities.

    4.4 Beginning special education professionals engage individuals with exceptionalities to work toward quality learning and performance and provide feedback to guide them.

    19

  • Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What Every Special Educator Must Know: Professional Ethics and Standards. Arlington, VA: CEC 3

    Initial Preparation Standard 5: Instructional Planning and Strategies5.0 Beginning special education professionals select, adapt, and use a repertoire of

    evidence-based instructional strategies to advance learning of individuals with exceptionalities.

    Key Elements5.1 Beginning special education professionals consider individual abilities, interests,

    learning environments, and cultural and linguistic factors in the selection, develop-ment, and adaptation of learning experiences for individuals with exceptionalities.

    5.2 Beginning special education professionals use technologies to support instructional assessment, planning, and delivery for individuals with exceptionalities.

    5.3 Beginning special education professionals are familiar with augmentative and alternative communication systems and a variety of assistive technologies to support the communication and learning of individuals with exceptionalities.

    5.4 Beginning special education professionals use strategies to enhance language development and communication skills of individuals with exceptionalities.

    5.5 Beginning special education professionals develop and implement a variety of education and transition plans for individuals with exceptionalities across a wide range of settings and different learning experiences in collaboration with individuals, families, and teams.

    5.6 Beginning special education professionals teach to mastery and promote generalization of learning.

    5.7 Beginning special education professionals teach cross-disciplinary knowledge and skills such as critical thinking and problem solving to individuals with exceptionalities.

    20

  • Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What Every Special Educator Must Know: Professional Ethics and Standards. Arlington, VA: CEC 4

    Initial Preparation Standard 6: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice6.0 Beginning special education professionals use foundational knowledge of the field

    and their professional ethical principles and practice standards to inform special education practice, to engage in lifelong learning, and to advance the profession.

    Key Elements6.1 Beginning special education professionals use professional ethical principles and

    professional practice standards to guide their practice.6.2 Beginning special education professionals understand how foundational knowledge

    and current issues influence professional practice.6.3 Beginning special education professionals understand that diversity is a part of

    families, cultures, and schools, and that complex human issues can interact with the delivery of special education services.

    6.4 Beginning special education professionals understand the significance of lifelong learning and participate in professional activities and learning communities.

    6.5 Beginning special education professionals advance the profession by engaging in activities such as advocacy and mentoring.

    6.6 Beginning special education professionals provide guidance and direction to paraeducators, tutors, and volunteers.

    Initial Preparation Standard 7: Collaboration7.0 Beginning special education professionals collaborate with families, other

    educators, related service providers, individuals with exceptionalities, and personnel from community agencies in culturally responsive ways to address the needs of individuals with exceptionalities across a range of learning experiences.

    Key Elements7.1 Beginning special education professionals use the theory and elements of effective

    collaboration.7.2 Beginning special education professionals serve as a collaborative resource to

    colleagues.7.3 Beginning special education professionals use collaboration to promote the well

    being of individuals with exceptionalities across a wide range of settings and collaborators.

    21

  • Appendix C

    Daily Schedule Model

    (Name, Address, and Phone # of School)

    20__ __ - 20__ __ School Term

    Type/Level of Class: Learning Support Room #: 000 Teacher: Ms. Pick

    REGULAR DAILY SCHEDULE

    EXAMPLE A Content Area Resource Room Model

    EXAMPLE B Co-teaching Inclusionary Model

    Period & Time Subject/Activity Period & Time Subject/Activity Period 1

    8:38-9:23 Academic Support Period 1

    8:13-8:55 Study Skills

    Period 2 9:26-10:08

    Learning Support Math

    Period 2 8:58-9:40

    Co-taught Math

    Period 3 10:11-10:53

    Learning Support Language Arts

    Period 3 9:43-10:25

    Co-taught Language Arts

    LUNCH 10:56-11:23

    Period 4 10:28-11:10

    Co-taught Language Arts

    Period 4 11:26-12:08

    Learning Support Math

    Period 5 11:13-12:40 LUNCH/PREP

    Period 5 12:11-12:53 PLANNING

    Period 6 12:43-1:25 Study Skills

    Period 6 12:56-1:38

    Learning Support Math

    Period 7 1:28-2:10

    Co-taught Math

    Period 7 1:41-2:23

    Learning Support Language Arts

    Period 8 2:13-2:55 RTII

    Period 8 2:26-3:11 Progress Monitoring

    Notes:

    22

  • Appendix D

    Induction Information Checklist

    (This should be completed no later than the 2nd week of each assignment.)

    One of the first problems encountered by the student teacher or a teacher who is new to a particular school is that of becoming acquainted with school policy. Once situations involving policy and procedures are mastered and become automatic, the teacher can put efforts where they belong - their students and teaching.

    For each item, mark off if completed, or if it is not applicable to your setting, mark N/A. Provide evidence of knowledge of items with informal comments/notes for applicable items in the space on the right of the page or on a separate sheet.

    Are you familiar with/responsible for:

    First Second Assign Assign

    morning arrival time?

    departure time?

    assistance on the playground?

    assistance with hall duty?

    assistance with bus duty?

    assistance with lunch duty?

    lunch schedule and orders?

    method of checking daily attendance?

    excusing children to leave the classroom procedure?

    fire drill procedure?

    lock down procedure?

    accident reporting procedure?

    field trip procedure?

    general care of the classroom procedure?

    school-wide and class discipline procedure?

    schedule of subjects and activities?

    schedules of specialists?

    faculty meeting schedules?

    district calendar?

    district learning management system?

    Comments/Notes for Applicable Items

    ___ ___

    ___ ___

    23

  • Can you locate:

    First Second

    Assign Assign

    the main office?

    the supply room?

    the library?

    the cafeteria?

    the playground areas?

    the duplicating facilities?

    the faculty room?

    the nurse's office?

    all the school's restrooms?

    Have you met or conferred with:

    First Second

    Assign Assign

    Comments/Notes for Applicable Items

    20

    ___ ___

    Do you have:

    First Second Assign Assign

    a space of your own?

    a regular conference time with your cooperating teacher?

    an access to teachers' manuals?

    a copy of the faculty handbook?

    access to district's materials and technology software?

    access to the district's text notification system?

    the nurse?

    the guidance counselor?

    the related service providers (e.g., speech therapist, occupational therapist, physical therapist, psychologist, social worker)?

    24

  • First Second Assign Assign

    Have you met or conferred with:

    the reading specialist?

    the principal/local education authority?

    the other classroom teachers?

    the paraprofessionals?

    the custodians?

    the secretaries?

    First Placement Signature of Completion

    ___________ _

    Student Teacher

    Second Placement Signature of Completion

    ___________ _

    Student Teacher

    Comments/Notes for Applicable Items

    25

  • Appendix E

    Placement Overview and Takeover Schedule

    Describe the district-level characteristics. Possible information included should involve: population served (# of

    students, SES data/# students on free or reduced lunch, racial/ethnicitydata), number of schools in district, number of teachers employed, etc.

    Describe the building-level characteristics. Possible information included should involve: population data, grade levels

    present in the school, number of students served, number of teachers(general education teachers/special education teachers), and specialpersonnel working in the building (e.g., paraprofessionals, guidancecounselor, speech therapist).

    Describe the classroom-level characteristics. Include the student demographic information (gender breakdown,

    race/ethnicity/ ELL data, number of students receiving special educationservices), grade level, class size, type of special education support (ifapplicable), & the number of adults in the classroom and their roles. Also,include the subject areas taught: both academic and non-academic.

    Outline the Takeover Schedule. Include each week and subject area(s) in which full responsibility for

    teaching will occur (i.e., lesson planning, having plans pre-approved bycooperating teacher, delivering instruction, reflecting upon teaching andadjusting future instruction), detailing the progression of subjects taken on,what the “full load” will look like, and then how subjects will be given back tothe teacher gradually before the placement ends. The student teachershould be taking over FULL responsibility for teaching for at 2-3 weeks of theplacement.

    Simplified example: Week 1

    i. Observe and assist teacher in all subjects Week 2

    i. morning meeting/circle time/calendarii. Spelling

    Week 3i. morning meeting/circle time/calendar

    ii. Spellingiii. Math (large group direct instruction & learning centers)

    26

  • Appendix F

    Supplemental Teaching Tool

    I. Title of tool createdII. Photograph(s) or electronic copy of teaching tool

    III. Explanation/Rationalea. Target group developed forb. Applicable subject areac. Connection to specific student needs

    IV. Evaluation of toola. Description of implementationb. Effectiveness of tool

    i. Student reactions or data collected on tool usec. Future applications or changes to make on tool

    27

  • Appendix G

    Learning Center

    One Learning Center must be developed and implemented in each placement. The following information must be detailed for this assignment:

    I. Title of Learning CenterII. Learning Objective(s) & Standard(s) the center will address

    III. Photograph(s) or electronic copies of materials utilizedIV. Detailed description of the center

    a. Activities (how to implement the center) and integrated assessmentV. Evaluation of the center

    a. Effectiveness based upon observations and datai. Student reactions

    b. Future changes to make

    28

  • Lesson Plan Assignment

    GENERAL OVERVIEW

    This special education lesson plan is used to plan and implement lessons in the special education student teaching placement. The special education lesson plan and special education rubric were used as assignments in other classes to prepare for this student teaching assignment. For this assignment, you will design and implement one special education lesson plan following the directions provided. To facilitate candidates’ demonstration of the understanding of the link between teacher directives, expected student responses, material usage, data collection, and analysis, the directions have been adapted to guide you in writing the assigned lesson plan.

    The lesson plan format and directions support key components for developing, implementing, and reflecting upon the lesson. The components are: content and skill selection, standards, instructional objective, formative and summative assessment, introduction, instructional methods, guided practice, independent practice, closure, differentiated activities, instructional resources, materials, and technology, analysis of student learning, and analysis of teaching.

    Using the lesson plan components, the special education lesson plan rubric (teacher candidate performance expectations), and in collaboration with your co-operating teacher and other professionals, develop one special education lesson that will be implemented and then submitted as a required assignment for this course. In planning, implementing, and reflecting on your lesson plan, you are required to meet with your cooperating teacher and other relevant professionals* (e.g., university supervisor, paraeducators, general education teachers, related service providers, and families). The input from this collaboration must be considered throughout the lesson plan process. To demonstrate your collaboration, the attached form must be completed with verification (e.g., signature, e-mail). The completed lesson plan will be assessed using the Special Education Lesson Plan Rubric.

    Candidates must meet CEC Initial Preparation Standards on this assessment to pass SPECED 488/588 & SPECED 489/589. If on the initial submission of the plan, the candidate does not meet standards, the plan must be revised and submitted until standards are met. The meeting of standards is defined as having an average rating of “meets expectations” across the assessment.

    SPECIAL EDUCATION LESSON PLAN DIRECTIONS FOR EACH COMPONENT Describe what you will say or do for each component in the lesson as indicated in the Annotated Lesson Plan Format for Special Education Student Teaching.

    Appendix H

    29

  • Lesson Plan Format-Blank Modified for Special Education Student Teaching

    Name: Date:

    Lesson Title: Time Allotted:

    Unit Title (if applicable): Lesson Number w/in Unit:

    Grade Level(s):

    Subject Area(s)/Subject Content Explanation/Rationale:

    I. LESSON FOUNDATION

    Standard(s)/Anchors:

    Essential Question(s):

    Instructional Objective(s):

    Formative Assessment:

    Lesson Pre-Assessment:

    During-instruction formative assessments:

    Summative Assessment: Lesson Post-Assessment:

    Unit Summative Assessment (if applicable):

    II. LESSON BODY

    TEACHING PROCEDURES

    1. Introduction:

    2. Description of Method(s) Used to Present Subject Matter/Modeling:

    3. Guided Practice:

    4. Independent Practice:

    5. Closure:

    III. LESSON ESSENTIALS

    Differentiated Learning Activities:

    Accommodations/Modifications:

    Instructional Resources, Materials, and Technology:

    IV. POST-LESSON REFLECTION

    Analysis of Student Learning:

    Analysis of Teaching: 30

  • Lesson Plan Format-Annotated Version Modified for Special Education Student Teaching

    Name: Date:

    Lesson Title: Time Allotted:

    Unit Title (if applicable): Lesson Number w/in Unit:

    Grade