SPECIAL PROCEEDINGSFEU-Lasalle JD-MBA Program

Course OutlineThird Termn SY 2012-2013

Atty, Ronald C' Chua

PRELIMINARIEq

Define ActionDefine Special Proceeding

Action v. Special Proceeding

capps:1) Hagans v. Wislezenus, 42Pnil 880 (1920)2) Natcher v. Court of Appeals, 366 SCRA 386 (2001)3) Vda. De Manalo v. Court of Appeals, 349 SCRA 135 QAAI) 366 SCRA

752 (2001)

JURISDICTION

Extent of Jurisdiction * BP 129, as amended

Cages:1) Mangaliman v, Gonzales, 36 SCRA 462 (1970)2) Baybayan v. Aquino, 149 SCRA 185 (1987)3) Fernandez v. Maravilla, 10 SCRA 589 (1964)4) Manalo v. Paredes,4T Pnil 938 (1925)

RULE ?2 - SUB,JECJ MATTFR AIIID APPLIQABILLTY oF QENFBAL BULE$

Relate to other provisions of the ROC

Casq:1) Fernandezv. Maravilla, supra

RULE 7? - YENUEJTIID Bp,cEss

Steps to determine which court has jurisdictionWhen doee the court acquire jurisdiction?Settlement of estate upon dissolution of maniagePresumption of Death - Article 390 to 392 of the CC

Cases:1) Salazarv. CFlof Laguna, &1 Phil78 (1937)2) Cayetano v. Leonidas, 129 SCRA 522 (1984\3) In re l(aw Singco, 74Pnil 239 (1943)4) Garcia Fule v. Court of Appeals, 74 SCRA 189 (1976)5) Cuenoo v. Court of Appeals, 53 SCRA 360 (1973)6) Ongsingco v, Tan, 97 Phil 330 (1955)7) Eusebio v. Eusebio, 100 Phil593 (1956)8) Sandovalv. Santiago, 83 Pnil78r (1949)9) Vda. De Manzanero v. CFI of Batangas, 61 Phil 850 (1935)1O)Benedicto v. Javellana, 10 Phil 197 (1908)11)Casiano v. Maloto, 70 SCRA 232 (1977)12)Cuizon v. Ramolete,129 SCRA 495 (1984)13)Bemardo v. Court of Appeals, 7 SCRA 367 (1963)14)Uriarte v. CFI of Negros Occidental, 33 SCRA 252 (1970)l5)PCIB v. Esalin,56 SCRA 266 (1974)16)Del Rosario v. Del Rosario, 67 Phil652 (1939)17)Dolar v. Roman Catholic, 68 Phil727 (1939)18)Alfonso v. Natividad, 6 Phil240 (1906)19)Cruz v. De Jesus, 52 Phil 870 (1929)20)De la Rama v. De la Rama, 7 Phil 745 (9A7)21)Villacorte v. Mariano, 89 Phil342 (1951)22)Calma v. Tanedo,66 Phil 594 (1938)23)Ocampo v. Potenciano 89 Phil 160 (1951)24)Prado v. Natividad,4T Phil776 (1925)25)De la Rama v. De la Rama, 25 Phil 437 (1913126)Fulgencio v. Gatchalian,2l Pnil252 (1912)27)Lukban v. Republic, 98 Phil 574 (1956)

RULE 74 - SUL4MARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATES

Different modes of intestate settlementRequisites of a valid extrajudicial settlementNature of summary settlementRequisites for a valid summary settlement of an estate of small value

Extrajudicial Settlement v. Summary Settlement

Cases:1) Utulo v. Vda. De Garcia, 66 Phil302 (1938)2) Hernandez v. Andal, 78 Phil 196 (194713) Tonesv. Tones, 10 SCRA 185 (1964)4) Areillas v. Montejo,26 SCRA 197 (1968)5) Ermac v. Medelo, 64 SCRA 359 (1975)

6) Caneon v. Agcaoili, 1 SCRA 521 (1961)7) McMicking v. $y Conbieng, 21 Phil 211 (1912)8) Pereira v. Court of Appeals, 174 SCRA 154 (1939)9) Jerez v. Nietes, 30 SCRA 905 (1969)

RULE 7fi - PBgPgg,r|pN qF WLI-. ALLOWAFIGE 9F wlft NEpFS$ARYnulE.,,g - *uLsmilsr Qn pmeulgwange pr wlur#

Nature of probate of a willEffect of allowanee or disallowance of a willJurisdictional requirements for probate of a willScope of inquiry on proceeding to probate willProof required on probate hearingBinding force of trial court order allowing or disallowing a willWhen jurisdiction vest

Cases:1) Femandez v. Dimagiba, 21 SCRA 428 (1967)2) Mercado v. Santos, 66 SCRA215 (1938)3) Sumilang v. Ramagosa,2l SCRA 1369 (1967)4) Balanay v. Martinez, 64 SCRA 452 (19751

5) PastorJr. v. Court of Appeals, 122 SCRA 885 (1983)6) US v. Chiu Guimco,30 Phil 917 (1917)7) Rodriguez v. Borja, 17 SCRA 418 (1966)8) Teotico v. DelVal, 13 SCRA 406 (1965)9) Femando v. Crisostomo, 90 SCRA 585 (1951)10)Araujo v. Celis, 6 Phil459 (1906)11)Lim Billian v. Suntay, 63 Phil 793 (1936)12)Basa v. Mercado, 61 Phil632 (1935)13)DeAranzv. Galing, 161 $CRA628 (1988)14)ln rra EEtate of Johnson, 39 Phil 156 (1918)15)Abut v. Abut, 45 SCRA 326 (1972t16)Rodelas v. Aranza, 119 SCRA 16 (1982)17)Gan v. YaP, 104 PhilsOg (1958)18)Gago v. fMamuyac, 49 Phil 902 (1927)19)Aldanase v. $alutillo,47 Phil 548 (1925)20)Cabang v. Delfinado, 34 Phil 291 (1916)21)Avara v. Garcia, 42Phil 145 (1921)22)$olivio v. Court of Appeals, 182 SCRA 1 1 I (1990)23)Manalo v. Paredes, suPra24)Riera v. Palmaroli, 40 Phil 105 (1919)25)Manahan v. Manahan, 58 Phil448 (1933)

Article 815 to 817 of the CCRequisites of probate of a will allowed in a foreign state

Caqeq;1) $untay v. Suntay, 95 Phil 500 (1954)2) Fluemer v. Hix, 54 Phil 610 (1930)3) Miciano v. Brimo, 50 Phil 867 (1924)+i teon & Ghezzi v" Manufacturers Life lnsurance Co.,90 Phil459 (1951)

BU!-E 7s - RUIF $5 Ar{p RU!"EJ}?

Who may serye ae executors and administratorsExecutor v. AdministratorOther ground for disqualification or incompetencyWhen are letters of administration grantedKinds of administratorslnterest required to oppose issuance of letters testamentarySpecial AdminishatorBond of executor and administratorlnventory and APPraisalPowers and duties of executor and administratorAccountabitity and compensation of executor and administratorAction by and against executor and administrator

CaFeq:1) Guenero v. Teran, 13 Phil 212 (1909)2) Navasv. Garcia,44Pnt711 (1923)3) Mereado v. Vda. De Jaen, 64 Phil 75 (1937)4) Qzaetav. Pecson and BPl, 93 Phit416 (1953)5) De Guzman v. Limeolioc, 68 Phil673 (1939)6) Gonzales v. Aguinaldo, 190 SCRA 112 (1990)

7) Johannes v. Haryey,43 Phil 175 (1922)8) Gutierrez de Ocampo v. Valera Calderon, 59 Phil6319) Trillana v. Crisostomo, 89 Phil71010)Gutierrez v. Villegas, 5 SCRA 313 (1962)11)Duran v. Duran, 20 SCRA 37912)De Guzman v. Angeles, 162 SCRA347 (1988)13)Garcia Fule v. Court of Appeals, supra14)Roxasv. Pecson, 82 Phil 407 (1948)1S)Pijuan v. Vda. De Gunea, 18 SCRA 898 (1966)16)Tan v. Go Chiong Lee, 46 Phil200 (1924)17)Ltzzarga Hermanos v. Abada, 4A Pnil 12418)Wamer Bames v. Luzon Surety, 95 Phil 924 (1954)

19)Wlson v. Rear, 55 Phil4420)Luzon $urety v. Quebral,127 SCRA 295 (1984)21)Cosme de Mendoza v. Pacheco,64 Phil 134 (1937)22)Gustilo v. $ian, 53 Phil 155 (1929)Z3)Degala v, Oeniza and Umipig, 78 Phil 79124)Chua Tan v Del Rosario, 57 Phil 411 (1932125)Adapon v. Maralit, 69 Phil 383 (1940)26)Moore & Sons Mercantile Co. v. Wagner, 50 Phil 128 {1927),27)$antero v. CFI of Cavite, 153 SCRA 72828)Concepcion Jocson de Hilado v. Nava, 69 Phil 1 (1939)29)$an Diego v. Nombre, 11 SCRA 165 (1964)30)Jaroda v. Cusi Jr", 28 SCRA 1008 (1969)31)Garcia v. Escudero, 43 Phil 43732)Nicolas v Nicolas,6S Phil 332 (1936)33)Uy Tioco v. lmperial, 53 Phil 802 t1928)34)Dacanay v. gemandez, 53 Phil 824 (1928)35)Lacsonv. Reyes, 182 SCRA 729 (1990)36)Rosenstock v. Elser, 48 Phil 708 (1925)37)Joson v. Joson, 2 SCRA 8338)Philippine Trust Co. v. Luzon Surety, 2 SCRA 122 (1951)39)Dela Cruz v. Camon, 16 SCRA 886 (1966)40)Quirino v, Gorospe, 169 SCRATOZ (1989)41)Aguas v. Lllemos, 5 SCRA 959 (1962)42)Melgar v Buenviaje,179 SCRA 196 (1989)43)Pajarillo v. lAC, 176 SCRA 34044)Bernado v. CA,7 SCRA 367 (1963)45)Guanco v. National Bank, 54 Phil 244 $WA)46)Alafriz v Mina, 28 Phil 137 (1914)47)Heirs of Gregoire v. Baker, 51 Phil 75 {1927\48)Velasquez v. George, 125 SCRA 456 (1983)