spencer-van etten central school district 2017-18 budget ... · 2070 inservice training-instruction...

Spencer-Van Etten Central School District

2017-18 Budget Statement

Includes:

Proposed Budget in Three Components

Proposed Revenues

Property Tax Report Card

School Academic Report Card

District’s Fiscal Accountability Summary

Administrative Compensation Information

Exemption Impact Reports

3-Part Budget Report

Spencer VanEtten Central School

Fiscal Year: 2018

10:42:19 am

April 26, 2017

2017-2018

Proposed

BudgetDescriptionState Function

Administration

1010 Board Of Education 13,213.00

1040 District Clerk 4,172.00

1060 District Meeting 1,476.00

1240 Chief School Administrator 214,894.00

1310 Business Administration 446,098.00

1320 Auditing 20,300.00

1325 Treasurer -

1330 Tax Collector 8,155.00

1380 Fiscal Agent Fee 3,500.00

1420 Legal 5,000.00

1430 Personnel 61,053.00

1480 Public Information and Services 56,495.00

1670 Central Printing & Mailing 6,000.00

1910 Unallocated Insurance 84,000.00

1920 School Association Dues 9,861.00

1981 BOCES Administrative Costs 242,726.00

1983 BOCES Capital Expenses 90,608.00

2010 Curriculum Devel and Suprvsn 51,007.00

2020 Supervision-Regular School 507,474.00

2060 Research, Planning & Evaluation 10,075.00

2070 Inservice Training-Instruction -

2110 Teaching-Regular School -

9000 Employee Benefits -

9010 State Retirement 63,792.00

9020 Teachers' Retirement 53,977.00

9030 Social Security 73,356.00

9040 Workers' Compensation 17,308.00

9050 Unemployment Insurance 1,617.00

9055 Disability Insurance 980.00

9060 Hospital, Medical, Dental Insurance 253,425.00

9089 Other (specify) 9,480.00

2,310,042.00Total Administration

Capital

1620 Operation of Plant 949,564.00

1621 Maintenance of Plant 326,438.00

1930 Judgments and Claims -

1964 Refund on Real Property Taxes -





9055 Disability Insurance 2,300.00

9060 Hospital, Medical, Dental Insurance 230,209.00

9089 Other (specify) 720.00

9710 Serial Bonds-Other (specify) -

9711 Serial Bonds-School Construction 3,232,484.00

9712 Serial Bonds-Bus Purchases 56,238.00

9720 Statutory Bonds-Other (specify) -

9730 Bond Antic Notes-Other (specify) -

9731 Bond Antic Notes-School Construction -

9770 Revenue Anticipation Notes -

9785 Install Purch Debt-State Aided Hardware -

9789 Other Debt (specify) 153,278.00

9950 Transfer to Capital Fund -

5,114,141.00Total Capital

Program

1420 Legal 25,000.00

2010 Curriculum Devel and Suprvsn 80,102.00

2070 Inservice Training-Instruction 88,320.00

2110 Teaching-Regular School 4,698,335.00

2250 Prg For Sdnts w/Disabil-Med Elgble 2,314,477.00

2280 Occupational Education(Grades 9-12) 452,500.00

WinCap Ver. 17.04.25.2093

3-Part Budget Report


Fiscal Year: 2018

10:42:19 am

April 26, 2017

2017-2018

Proposed

BudgetDescriptionState Function

2330 Teaching-Special Schools 300.00

2610 School Library & AV 143,222.00

2630 Computer Assisted Instruction 726,535.00

2810 Guidance-Regular School 228,862.00

2815 Health Srvcs-Regular School 119,562.00

2820 Psychological Srvcs-Reg Schl 76,919.00

2825 Social Work Srvcs-Regular School 108,574.00

2850 Co-Curricular Activ-Reg Schl 100,877.00

2855 Interscholastic Athletics-Reg Schl 260,354.00

5510 District Transport Srvcs-Med Elgble 794,322.00

5530 Garage Building 24,749.00

5540 Contract Transportation-Med Elgble -

7140 Recreation -

8070 Census -

9000 Employee Benefits -


9020 Teachers' Retirement 620,039.00




9055 Disability Insurance 2,620.00

9060 Hospital, Medical, Dental Insurance 3,318,408.00

9089 Other (specify) 720.00

9901 Transfer to Other Funds -

9901 Transfer to School Food Service Fund 60,000.00

9901 Transfer to Special Aid Fund 35,000.00

15,128,241.00Total Program

22,552,424.00Report Totals

Selection Criteria

Report Title: 3-Part Budget Report

Column 1 Value: Proposed Amount

Column 2 Value: None





From Column Value: Current Year Initial

To Column Value: Proposed Amount

Sort by: Budget Category / State Function Code

Printed by Jane St. Amour-Bradley

WinCap Ver. 17.04.25.2093

Fund: A GENERAL FUND

2017-18 BOE Approved Revenue


Fiscal Year: 2018

April 26, 2017

10:45:54 am

2017-2018

Proposed

RevenueRevenue Account Description

1001.000 Real Property Taxes 5,644,446.00

1081.000 Other Pmts in Lieu of Taxes 96,000.00

1085.000 STAR Reimbursement 1,000,000.00

1090.000 Int. & Penal. on Real Prop.Tax 25,000.00

1410.000 Admissions (from Individuals) 3,500.00

2401.000 Interest and Earnings 2,000.00

2410.000 Rental of Real Property,Indiv. 3,500.00

2413.000 Rental of Real Property, BOCES 3,000.00

2701.000 Refund PY Exp-BOCES Aided Srvc 150,000.00

2703.000 Refund PY Exp-Other-Not Trans 30,000.00

2770.000 Other Unclassified Rev.(Spec) 80,000.00

3101.000 Basic Formula Aid-Gen Aids (Ex 11,974,967.00

3101.001 Basic Formula- Comm Schools 76,108.00

3101.100 Basic Formula Aid-Excess Cost 71,229.00

3102.000 Lottery Aid 1,000,000.00

3102.100 Lottery Aid - VLT Grant 600,000.00

3103.000 BOCES Aid (Sect 3609a Ed Law) 1,132,612.00

3260.000 Textbook Aid (Incl Txtbk/Lott) 51,785.00

3262.000 Computer Sftwre, Hrdwre Aid 32,065.00

3263.000 Library A/V Loan Program Aid 5,575.00

5997.000 Appropriated Reserves 327,197.00

5999.000 Appropriated Fund Balance 243,440.00

Total GENERAL FUND 22,552,424.00

Selection Criteria

Criteria Name: Last Run

Fund: A

Report Title: 2017-18 BOE Approved Revenue

Suppress revenue accounts with zero amount

Column 1 Value: Proposed Revenue









From Column Value: Current Year Initial Estimate

To Column Value: Proposed Revenue

Sort by: Fund

Printed by Jane St. Amour-Bradley

WinCap Ver. 17.04.25.2093

SPENCER-VAN ETTEN CSD - SCHOOL REPORT CARD DATA [2015 - 16]

SPENCER-VAN ETTEN CSD ENROLLMENT (2015 - 16)K-12 ENROLLMENT 856

ENROLLMENT BY GENDERMALE

453 53%

FEMALE

403 47%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITYGROUP

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

HISPANIC OR LATINO

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

TOTAL

4

17

14

9

808

4

PERCENT

0%

2%

2%

1%

94%

0%

OTHER GROUPSENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

— —

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

124 14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

487 57%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADEGROUP

PRE-K (FULL DAY)

K (FULL DAY)

1ST GRADE

2ND GRADE

3RD GRADE

4TH GRADE

5TH GRADE

6TH GRADE

UNGRADED ELEMENTARY

7TH GRADE

8TH GRADE

9TH GRADE

10TH GRADE

11TH GRADE

12TH GRADE

UNGRADED SECONDARY

TOTAL

36

63

55

71

53

75

63

72

5

71

65

71

74

61

50

7

PERCENT

4%

7%

6%

8%

6%

9%

7%

8%

1%

8%

8%

8%

9%

7%

6%

1%

1 of 45

AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (2015 - 16)

ATTENDANCE (2014 - 15)

STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2014 - 15)

TEACHER TURNOVER RATE (2014-15 TO 2015-16)

GROUP

COMMON BRANCH

GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS

GRADE 8 SCIENCE

GRADE 10 ENGLISH

GRADE 10 MATHEMATICS

CLASS SIZE

22

20

22

15

17

FREE AND REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH (2015 - 16)ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH

356 42%

ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH

104 12%

ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE94%

23 3%

2 of 45

STAFF COUNTS (2015 - 16)

TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS (2015 - 16)

GROUP

PRINCIPALS

ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS

OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF

PARAPROFESSIONALS

STAFF

3

0

7

33

TOTAL TEACHERS 85

PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE 4%

PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE 5%

PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 11%

PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE 8%

TOTAL NUMBER OF CORE CLASSES 220

PERCENT NOT TAUGHT BY HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS IN THIS DISTRICT 220

TOTAL NUMBER OF CLASSES 334

PERCENT TAUGHT BY TEACHERS WITHOUT APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATION 8%

3 of 45

HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETERS (2015 - 16)GROUP

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

48

41

7

GRADUATES (REGENTS + LOCAL DIPLOMAS)

46

41

5

REGENTS DIPLOMA

44 96%

41 100%

3 60%

GROUP

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION

17 37%

17 41%

0 0%

REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT

4 9%

3 7%

1 20%

LOCAL DIPLOMAS

2 4%

0 0%

2 40%

COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS

2 4%

0 0%

2 29%

4 of 45

HIGH SCHOOL NON-COMPLETERS (2015 - 16)GROUP

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


DROPPED OUT

_ _

_ _

_ _

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION

PROGRAM

_ _

_ _

_ _

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_ _

_ _

_ _

5 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

24%

34%40%

2%

42%

27%31%

35%

7%

42%

GRADE 3 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 306

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS


NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

50

42

8

2

1

47

50

19

31

50

34

16

50

TOTAL TESTED

42%

48%

13%

_%

_%

_%

42%

47%

39%

42%

35%

56%

42%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

12 24%

6 14%

6 75%

_ _

_ _

_ _

12 24%

3 16%

9 29%

12 24%

10 29%

2 13%

12 24%

LEVEL 2

17 34%

16 38%

1 13%

_ _

_ _

_ _

17 34%

7 37%

10 32%

17 34%

12 35%

5 31%

17 34%

LEVEL 3

20 40%

19 45%

1 13%

_ _

_ _

_ _

20 40%

9 47%

11 35%

20 40%

11 32%

9 56%

20 40%

LEVEL 4

1 2%

1 2%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

1 2%

0 0%

1 3%

1 2%

1 3%

0 0%

1 2%

7 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

26%

38%

25%

11%

35%

24%

35%

26%

15%

41%


MEAN SCORE: 302

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC…


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

65

54

11

2

2

1

60

5

30

35

65

40

25

65

TOTAL TESTED

35%

41%

9%

_%

_%

_%

33%

60%

53%

20%

35%

28%

48%

35%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

17 26%

8 15%

9 82%

_ _

_ _

_ _

17 28%

0 0%

4 13%

13 37%

17 26%

11 28%

6 24%

17 26%

LEVEL 2

25 38%

24 44%

1 9%

_ _

_ _

_ _

23 38%

2 40%

10 33%

15 43%

25 38%

18 45%

7 28%

25 38%

LEVEL 3

16 25%

15 28%

1 9%

_ _

_ _

_ _

14 23%

2 40%

10 33%

6 17%

16 25%

8 20%

8 32%

16 25%

LEVEL 4

7 11%

7 13%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

6 10%

1 20%

6 20%

1 3%

7 11%

3 8%

4 16%

7 11%

8 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.043%

34%

14%9%

22%

36%30%

23%

10%

33%


MEAN SCORE: 286

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

58

53

5

1

2

54

1

58

27

31

58

33

25

58

TOTAL TESTED

22%

25%

0%

_%

_%

_%

_%

22%

22%

23%

22%

12%

36%

22%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

25 43%

20 38%

5 100%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

25 43%

12 44%

13 42%

25 43%

19 58%

6 24%

25 43%

LEVEL 2

20 34%

20 38%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

20 34%

9 33%

11 35%

20 34%

10 30%

10 40%

20 34%

LEVEL 3

8 14%

8 15%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

8 14%

3 11%

5 16%

8 14%

3 9%

5 20%

8 14%

LEVEL 4

5 9%

5 9%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

5 9%

3 11%

2 6%

5 9%

1 3%

4 16%

5 9%

9 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

27%

42%

18%12%

30%27%

38%

20%14%

34%


MEAN SCORE: 298

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

66

58

8

1

2

1

61

1

5

27

39

66

38

28

66

TOTAL TESTED

30%

34%

0%

_%

_%

_%

31%

_%

20%

37%

26%

30%

18%

46%

30%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

18 27%

11 19%

7 88%

_ _

_ _

_ _

17 28%

_ _

1 20%

4 15%

14 36%

18 27%

16 42%

2 7%

18 27%

LEVEL 2

28 42%

27 47%

1 13%

_ _

_ _

_ _

25 41%

_ _

3 60%

13 48%

15 38%

28 42%

15 39%

13 46%

28 42%

LEVEL 3

12 18%

12 21%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

12 20%

_ _

0 0%

7 26%

5 13%

12 18%

6 16%

6 21%

12 18%

LEVEL 4

8 12%

8 14%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

7 11%

_ _

1 20%

3 11%

5 13%

8 12%

1 3%

7 25%

8 12%

10 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

31%

46%

18% 5%23%

28%36%

24%

11%

35%


MEAN SCORE: 297

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

65

57

8

1

1

63

65

30

35

65

38

27

65

TOTAL TESTED

23%

26%

0%

_%

_%

_%

23%

30%

17%

23%

16%

33%

23%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

20 31%

14 25%

6 75%

_ _

_ _

_ _

20 31%

5 17%

15 43%

20 31%

15 39%

5 19%

20 31%

LEVEL 2

30 46%

28 49%

2 25%

_ _

_ _

_ _

30 46%

16 53%

14 40%

30 46%

17 45%

13 48%

30 46%

LEVEL 3

12 18%

12 21%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

12 18%

7 23%

5 14%

12 18%

6 16%

6 22%

12 18%

LEVEL 4

3 5%

3 5%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

3 5%

2 7%

1 3%

3 5%

0 0%

3 11%

3 5%

11 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

21%

49%

22%

9%

31%24%

35%27%

14%

41%


MEAN SCORE: 300

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

68

58

10

1

1

66

68

39

29

68

39

29

68

TOTAL TESTED

31%

34%

10%

_%

_%

_%

31%

41%

17%

31%

21%

45%

31%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

14 21%

7 12%

7 70%

_ _

_ _

_ _

14 21%

5 13%

9 31%

14 21%

6 15%

8 28%

14 21%

LEVEL 2

33 49%

31 53%

2 20%

_ _

_ _

_ _

33 49%

18 46%

15 52%

33 49%

25 64%

8 28%

33 49%

LEVEL 3

15 22%

14 24%

1 10%

_ _

_ _

_ _

15 22%

10 26%

5 17%

15 22%

6 15%

9 31%

15 22%

LEVEL 4

6 9%

6 10%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

6 9%

6 15%

0 0%

6 9%

2 5%

4 14%

6 9%

12 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

8%

41% 39%

12%

51%

25%31%

22% 22%

44%

GRADE 3 MATHEMATICSDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 314

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

51

43

8

2

1

48

51

20

31

51

35

16

51

TOTAL TESTED

51%

56%

25%

_%

_%

_%

51%

60%

45%

51%

43%

69%

51%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

4 8%

3 7%

1 13%

_ _

_ _

_ _

4 8%

1 5%

3 10%

4 8%

4 11%

0 0%

4 8%

LEVEL 2

21 41%

16 37%

5 63%

_ _

_ _

_ _

21 41%

7 35%

14 45%

21 41%

16 46%

5 31%

21 41%

LEVEL 3

20 39%

18 42%

2 25%

_ _

_ _

_ _

20 39%

10 50%

10 32%

20 39%

12 34%

8 50%

20 39%

LEVEL 4

6 12%

6 14%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

6 12%

2 10%

4 13%

6 12%

3 9%

3 19%

6 12%

13 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

26%

41%

20%14%

33%28% 28%

23% 21%

45%


MEAN SCORE: 300

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

66

54

12

1

2

2

1

60

6

29

37

66

40

26

66

TOTAL TESTED

33%

39%

8%

_%

_%

_%

_%

33%

33%

45%

24%

33%

25%

46%

33%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

17 26%

10 19%

7 58%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

16 27%

1 17%

5 17%

12 32%

17 26%

12 30%

5 19%

17 26%

LEVEL 2

27 41%

23 43%

4 33%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

24 40%

3 50%

11 38%

16 43%

27 41%

18 45%

9 35%

27 41%

LEVEL 3

13 20%

13 24%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

11 18%

2 33%

8 28%

5 14%

13 20%

5 13%

8 31%

13 20%

LEVEL 4

9 14%

8 15%

1 8%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

9 15%

0 0%

5 17%

4 11%

9 14%

5 13%

4 15%

9 14%

14 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

10

20

30

40

29%33%

24%

15%

38%

32%28%

24%

16%

40%


MEAN SCORE: 307

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

55

51

4

1

2

51

1

55

24

31

55

30

25

55

TOTAL TESTED

38%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

38%

33%

42%

38%

20%

60%

38%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

16 29%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

16 29%

7 29%

9 29%

16 29%

14 47%

2 8%

16 29%

LEVEL 2

18 33%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

18 33%

9 38%

9 29%

18 33%

10 33%

8 32%

18 33%

LEVEL 3

13 24%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

13 24%

6 25%

7 23%

13 24%

4 13%

9 36%

13 24%

LEVEL 4

8 15%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

8 15%

2 8%

6 19%

8 15%

2 7%

6 24%

8 15%

15 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

15

30

45

60

10%

34%

22%

33%

55%

26%34%

18%22%

40%


MEAN SCORE: 320

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

67

59

8

1

2

1

1

61

1

6

29

38

67

37

30

67

TOTAL TESTED

55%

63%

0%

_%

_%

_%

_%

57%

_%

33%

59%

53%

55%

41%

73%

55%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

7 10%

1 2%

6 75%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

6 10%

_ _

1 17%

2 7%

5 13%

7 10%

7 19%

0 0%

7 10%

LEVEL 2

23 34%

21 36%

2 25%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

20 33%

_ _

3 50%

10 34%

13 34%

23 34%

15 41%

8 27%

23 34%

LEVEL 3

15 22%

15 25%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

14 23%

_ _

1 17%

9 31%

6 16%

15 22%

8 22%

7 23%

15 22%

LEVEL 4

22 33%

22 37%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

21 34%

_ _

1 17%

8 28%

14 37%

22 33%

7 19%

15 50%

22 33%

16 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0

15

30

45

60

19%

30% 28%23%

52%

34%30%

22%14%

36%


Mean scores and data in the table for grade 7 math include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.

For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 7 students who took a Regents math test in lieu

of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 7 students who took the Grade 7 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 320

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

64

56

8

1

1

62

64

30

34

64

37

27

64

TOTAL TESTED

52%

59%

0%

_%

_%

_%

52%

53%

50%

52%

41%

67%

52%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

12 19%

4 7%

8 100%

_ _

_ _

_ _

12 19%

2 7%

10 29%

12 19%

10 27%

2 7%

12 19%

LEVEL 2

19 30%

19 34%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

19 30%

12 40%

7 21%

19 30%

12 32%

7 26%

19 30%

LEVEL 3

18 28%

18 32%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

18 28%

7 23%

11 32%

18 28%

9 24%

9 33%

18 28%

LEVEL 4

15 23%

15 27%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

15 23%

9 30%

6 18%

15 23%

6 16%

9 33%

15 23%

17 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 & above 3 & above0.0

12.5

25.0

37.5

50.0

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

29% 27%

17%

27%

44%


Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 math include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 New York State Testing Program Assessment (NYSTP) in Mathematics.

For 2015 and forward, data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics and grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu

of the NYSTP. For 2014 and earlier, data in the bar charts include only those for grade 8 students who took the Grade 8 NYSTP.

MEAN SCORE: 307

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

58

51

7

1

1

56

58

34

24

58

35

23

58

TOTAL TESTED

31%

35%

0%

_%

_%

_%

31%

26%

38%

31%

20%

48%

31%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

9 16%

5 10%

4 57%

_ _

_ _

_ _

9 16%

3 9%

6 25%

9 16%

6 17%

3 13%

9 16%

LEVEL 2

31 53%

28 55%

3 43%

_ _

_ _

_ _

31 53%

22 65%

9 38%

31 53%

22 63%

9 39%

31 53%

LEVEL 3

13 22%

13 25%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

13 22%

6 18%

7 29%

13 22%

7 20%

6 26%

13 22%

LEVEL 4

5 9%

5 10%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

5 9%

3 9%

2 8%

5 9%

0 0%

5 22%

5 9%

GRADE 8 STUDENTS TAKING A REGENTS MATH TEST

Accelerated grade 8 students who took a Regents math test in lieu of the Grade 8 NYSTP in Mathematics.

ALL STUDENTS

GROUP

2

TOTAL TESTED LEVEL 1

_ _

LEVEL 2

_ _

LEVEL 3

_ _

4 & ABOVE

_ _

3 & ABOVE

_ _

18 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

4%10%

40% 46%

86%

3% 8% 36%

52%

89%

GRADE 4 SCIENCEDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.

MEAN SCORE: 79

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION





HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

70

57

13

1

2

2

1

64

6

32

38

70

43

27

70

TOTAL TESTED

86%

93%

54%

_%

_%

_%

_%

84%

100%

97%

76%

86%

84%

89%

86%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

3 4%

1 2%

2 15%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

3 5%

0 0%

0 0%

3 8%

3 4%

2 5%

1 4%

3 4%

LEVEL 2

7 10%

3 5%

4 31%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

7 11%

0 0%

1 3%

6 16%

7 10%

5 12%

2 7%

7 10%

LEVEL 3

28 40%

23 40%

5 38%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

25 39%

3 50%

16 50%

12 32%

28 40%

21 49%

7 26%

28 40%

LEVEL 4

32 46%

30 53%

2 15%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

29 45%

3 50%

15 47%

17 45%

32 46%

15 35%

17 63%

32 46%

19 of 45

District:2016

Statewide:2016

1 2 3 4 3-40

20

40

60

80

10%19%

58%

13%

71%

10%21%

40%29%

69%

GRADE 8 SCIENCEDue to changes in the 2015-16 grades 3-8 ELA and math exams, the pro ciency rates from exams prior to 2015-16 are not directly comparable to the 2015-16 pro ciency rates.

Data in the bar charts include those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test and grade 8 students who took a Regents science test in lieu of this test.

Mean scores and data in the table for grade 8 science include only those for grade 8 students who took the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.

MEAN SCORE: 69

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

56

49

7

1

1

54

56

31

25

56

35

21

56

TOTAL TESTED

73%

78%

43%

_%

_%

_%

73%

68%

80%

73%

66%

86%

73%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

4 7%

2 4%

2 29%

_ _

_ _

_ _

4 7%

3 10%

1 4%

4 7%

4 11%

0 0%

4 7%

LEVEL 2

11 20%

9 18%

2 29%

_ _

_ _

_ _

11 20%

7 23%

4 16%

11 20%

8 23%

3 14%

11 20%

LEVEL 3

35 63%

32 65%

3 43%

_ _

_ _

_ _

35 63%

17 55%

18 72%

35 63%

21 60%

14 67%

35 63%

LEVEL 4

6 11%

6 12%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

6 11%

4 13%

2 8%

6 11%

2 6%

4 19%

6 11%

GRADE 8 STUDENTS TAKING A REGENTS SCIENCE TEST

Accelerated grade 8 students who take a Regents science test in lieu of the New York State Grade 8 Science Test.

ALL STUDENTS

GROUP

6

TOTAL TESTED

50%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

2 33%

LEVEL 2

1 17%

LEVEL 3

1 17%

LEVEL 4

2 33%

20 of 45

READING

MATHEMATICS

READING

MATHEMATICS

STATEWIDE RESULTS ON THE NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS: NAEP (2014 - 15)

GRADE: 4

ALL STUDENTS

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASK…

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN…

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICA…

HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL


ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER…

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANT…

GROUP

32%

*%

20%

48%

44%

20%

*%

70%

74%

43%

BELOW BASIC

32%

*%

30%

34%

37%

31%

*%

22%

21%

36%

BASIC

27%

*%

33%

15%

17%

37%

*%

7%

4%

18%

PROFICIENT

9%

*%

17%

3%

2%

12%

*%

1%

1%

3%

ADVANCED

98

88

PARTICIPATION RATE

ALL STUDENTS




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

21%

*%

12%

40%

28%

12%

*%

49%

56%

29%

BELOW BASIC

44%

*%

31%

46%

51%

41%

*%

39%

35%

48%

BASIC

30%

*%

42%

13%

20%

40%

*%

10%

9%

21%

PROFICIENT

5%

*%

15%

1%

1%

7%

*%

2%

*%

2%

ADVANCED

98

91

PARTICIPATION RATE

GRADE: 8

ALL STUDENTS




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

27%

*%

19%

42%

35%

18%

*%

59%

78%

36%

BELOW BASIC

40%

*%

39%

41%

43%

39%

*%

33%

19%

42%

BASIC

29%

*%

34%

16%

20%

38%

*%

8%

3%

21%

PROFICIENT

4%

*%

8%

1%

2%

5%

*%

*%

*%

1%

ADVANCED

98

89

PARTICIPATION RATE

ALL STUDENTS


GROUP

31%

*%

BELOW BASIC

38%

*%

BASIC

24%

*%

PROFICIENT

7%

*%

ADVANCED PARTICIPATION RATE

21 of 45



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




18%

48%

41%

20%

*%

64%

72%

40%

30%

37%

40%

40%

*%

27%

21%

39%

33%

13%

16%

31%

*%

8%

6%

17%

19%

2%

3%

9%

*%

1%

1%

4%

99

94

22 of 45

District:2012Cohort

Statewide:2012Cohort

1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

2% 0%

42% 47%

89%

3% 3%37%

47%

85%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGEARTS AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

57

48

9

1

56

57

29

28

57

21

36

57

TOTAL TESTED

89%

96%

56%

_%

_%

89%

93%

86%

89%

95%

86%

89%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

1 2%

0 0%

1 11%

_ _

_ _

1 2%

0 0%

1 4%

1 2%

0 0%

1 3%

1 2%

LEVEL 2

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

LEVEL 3

24 42%

19 40%

5 56%

_ _

_ _

24 42%

11 38%

13 46%

24 42%

9 43%

15 42%

24 42%

LEVEL 4

27 47%

27 56%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

27 47%

16 55%

11 39%

27 47%

11 52%

16 44%

27 47%

23 of 45

District:2012Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

4% 9%

67%

19%

86%

3% 5%

59%

27%

86%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS AFTERFOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

57

48

9

1

56

57

29

28

57

21

36

57

TOTAL TESTED

86%

98%

22%

_%

_%

86%

90%

82%

86%

90%

83%

86%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

2 4%

0 0%

2 22%

_ _

_ _

2 4%

0 0%

2 7%

2 4%

0 0%

2 6%

2 4%

LEVEL 2

5 9%

1 2%

4 44%

_ _

_ _

5 9%

2 7%

3 11%

5 9%

2 10%

3 8%

5 9%

LEVEL 3

38 67%

36 75%

2 22%

_ _

_ _

38 67%

20 69%

18 64%

38 67%

15 71%

23 64%

38 67%

LEVEL 4

11 19%

11 23%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

11 19%

6 21%

5 18%

11 19%

4 19%

7 19%

11 19%

24 of 45

District:2012Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

7% 2%

60%

26%

86%

6% 6%

44%34%

78%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL GLOBAL HISTORY ANDGEOGRAPHY AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

57

48

9

1

56

57

29

28

57

21

36

57

TOTAL TESTED

86%

96%

33%

_%

_%

86%

90%

82%

86%

90%

83%

86%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

4 7%

1 2%

3 33%

_ _

_ _

4 7%

1 3%

3 11%

4 7%

1 5%

3 8%

4 7%

LEVEL 2

1 2%

0 0%

1 11%

_ _

_ _

1 2%

1 3%

0 0%

1 2%

1 5%

0 0%

1 2%

LEVEL 3

34 60%

31 65%

3 33%

_ _

_ _

34 60%

18 62%

16 57%

34 60%

14 67%

20 56%

34 60%

LEVEL 4

15 26%

15 31%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

15 26%

8 28%

7 25%

15 26%

5 24%

10 28%

15 26%

25 of 45

District:2012Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

2% 0%

40%49%

89%

3% 4%33%

48%

81%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL U.S. HISTORY ANDGOVERNMENT AFTER FOUR YEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

57

48

9

1

56

57

29

28

57

21

36

57

TOTAL TESTED

89%

96%

56%

_%

_%

89%

93%

86%

89%

95%

86%

89%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

1 2%

0 0%

1 11%

_ _

_ _

1 2%

0 0%

1 4%

1 2%

0 0%

1 3%

1 2%

LEVEL 2

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

LEVEL 3

23 40%

18 38%

5 56%

_ _

_ _

23 40%

12 41%

11 39%

23 40%

12 57%

11 31%

23 40%

LEVEL 4

28 49%

28 58%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

28 49%

15 52%

13 46%

28 49%

8 38%

20 56%

28 49%

26 of 45

District:2012Cohort


1 2 3 4 3-40

25

50

75

100

4% 0%

51%39%

89%

3% 5%

45%38%

84%

TOTAL COHORT RESULTS IN SECONDARY-LEVEL SCIENCE AFTER FOURYEARS OF INSTRUCTION

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

57

48

9

1

56

57

29

28

57

21

36

57

TOTAL TESTED

89%

96%

56%

_%

_%

89%

93%

86%

89%

95%

86%

89%

PROFICIENT LEVEL 1

2 4%

0 0%

2 22%

_ _

_ _

2 4%

1 3%

1 4%

2 4%

0 0%

2 6%

2 4%

LEVEL 2

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

LEVEL 3

29 51%

25 52%

4 44%

_ _

_ _

29 51%

17 59%

12 43%

29 51%

14 67%

15 42%

29 51%

LEVEL 4

22 39%

21 44%

1 11%

_ _

_ _

22 39%

10 34%

12 43%

22 39%

6 29%

16 44%

22 39%

27 of 45

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)

REGENTS GEOMETRY

Regents Examination Results (2015 - 16)

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (COMMON CORE)

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

69

57

12

1

2

66

69

29

40

69

29

40

69


5 7%

1 2%

4 33%

_ _

_ _

_ _

5 7%

0 0%

5 13%

5 7%

2 7%

3 8%

5 7%

LEVEL 2

3 4%

2 4%

1 8%

_ _

_ _

_ _

3 4%

1 3%

2 5%

3 4%

3 10%

0 0%

3 4%

LEVEL 3

22 32%

15 26%

7 58%

_ _

_ _

_ _

22 32%

9 31%

13 33%

22 32%

16 55%

6 15%

22 32%

LEVEL 4

11 16%

11 19%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

11 16%

5 17%

6 15%

11 16%

2 7%

9 23%

11 16%

LEVEL 5

28 41%

28 49%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

28 41%

14 48%

14 35%

28 41%

6 21%

22 55%

28 41%

GEOMETRY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

15

14

1

1

14

15

5

10

15

7

8

15

TOTAL TESTED 55

12 80%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

12 80%

5 100%

7 70%

12 80%

5 71%

7 88%

12 80%

65

10 67%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

10 67%

5 100%

5 50%

10 67%

4 57%

6 75%

10 67%

85

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

0 0%

28 of 45

REGENTS ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY

ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE)

ALGEBRA 2/TRIGONOMETRY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

55

55

1

2

1

51

55

30

25

55

17

38

55

TOTAL TESTED 55

38 69%

38 69%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

38 69%

20 67%

18 72%

38 69%

12 71%

26 68%

38 69%

65

25 45%

25 45%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

25 45%

13 43%

12 48%

25 45%

8 47%

17 45%

25 45%

85

5 9%

5 9%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

5 9%

2 7%

3 12%

5 9%

0 0%

5 13%

5 9%

ALGEBRA I (COMMON CORE)

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE


ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS



NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

87

76

11

3

1

83

87

46

41

86

1

31

56

87


3 3%

0 0%

3 27%

_ _

_ _

_ _

3 3%

1 2%

2 5%

_ _

_ _

2 6%

1 2%

3 3%

LEVEL 2

8 9%

3 4%

5 45%

_ _

_ _

_ _

8 9%

2 4%

6 15%

_ _

_ _

4 13%

4 7%

8 9%

LEVEL 3

49 56%

46 61%

3 27%

_ _

_ _

_ _

49 56%

25 54%

24 59%

_ _

_ _

21 68%

28 50%

49 56%

LEVEL 4

15 17%

15 20%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

15 17%

9 20%

6 15%

_ _

_ _

3 10%

12 21%

15 17%

LEVEL 5

12 14%

12 16%

0 0%

_ _

_ _

_ _

12 14%

9 20%

3 7%

_ _

_ _

1 3%

11 20%

12 14%

29 of 45

GEOMETRY (COMMON CORE)

ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)

GEOMETRY (COMMON CORE)

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

61

59

2

3

58

61

35

26

61

28

33

61


8 13%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

8 13%

2 6%

6 23%

8 13%

4 14%

4 12%

8 13%

LEVEL 2

14 23%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

14 23%

7 20%

7 27%

14 23%

6 21%

8 24%

14 23%

LEVEL 3

34 56%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

34 56%

24 69%

10 38%

34 56%

18 64%

16 48%

34 56%

LEVEL 4

2 3%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

2 3%

1 3%

1 4%

2 3%

0 0%

2 6%

2 3%

LEVEL 5

3 5%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

3 5%

1 3%

2 8%

3 5%

0 0%

3 9%

3 5%

ALGEBRA II (COMMON CORE)

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

40

40

2

38

40

21

19

40

13

27

40


8 20%

8 20%

_ _

_ _

8 20%

5 24%

3 16%

8 20%

5 38%

3 11%

8 20%

LEVEL 2

5 13%

5 13%

_ _

_ _

5 13%

4 19%

1 5%

5 13%

1 8%

4 15%

5 13%

LEVEL 3

19 48%

19 48%

_ _

_ _

19 48%

9 43%

10 53%

19 48%

5 38%

14 52%

19 48%

LEVEL 4

7 18%

7 18%

_ _

_ _

7 18%

3 14%

4 21%

7 18%

2 15%

5 19%

7 18%

LEVEL 5

1 3%

1 3%

_ _

_ _

1 3%

0 0%

1 5%

1 3%

0 0%

1 4%

1 3%

30 of 45

REGENTS GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY

REGENTS U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT

GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION




HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

103

88

15

2

2

1

98

5

51

52

103

46

57

103

TOTAL TESTED 55

88 85%

82 93%

6 40%

_ _

_ _

_ _

84 86%

4 80%

47 92%

41 79%

88 85%

37 80%

51 89%

88 85%

65

72 70%

70 80%

2 13%

_ _

_ _

_ _

68 69%

4 80%

35 69%

37 71%

72 70%

30 65%

42 74%

72 70%

85

23 22%

22 25%

1 7%

_ _

_ _

_ _

21 21%

2 40%

11 22%

12 23%

23 22%

7 15%

16 28%

23 22%

U.S. HISTORY & GOVERNMENT

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

68

57

11

1

2

65

68

29

39

68

27

41

68

TOTAL TESTED 55

65 96%

56 98%

9 82%

_ _

_ _

_ _

65 96%

29 100%

36 92%

65 96%

26 96%

39 95%

65 96%

65

61 90%

54 95%

7 64%

_ _

_ _

_ _

61 90%

27 93%

34 87%

61 90%

22 81%

39 95%

61 90%

85

35 51%

34 60%

1 9%

_ _

_ _

_ _

35 51%

18 62%

17 44%

35 51%

8 30%

27 66%

35 51%

31 of 45

REGENTS LIVING ENVIRONMENT

REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE

LIVING ENVIRONMENT

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION



HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE


ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS



NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

82

63

19

3

2

77

5

38

44

81

1

39

43

82

TOTAL TESTED 55

75 91%

63 100%

12 63%

_ _

_ _

71 92%

4 80%

36 95%

39 89%

_ _

_ _

33 85%

42 98%

75 91%

65

68 83%

60 95%

8 42%

_ _

_ _

65 84%

3 60%

33 87%

35 80%

_ _

_ _

28 72%

40 93%

68 83%

85

27 33%

26 41%

1 5%

_ _

_ _

25 32%

2 40%

15 39%

12 27%

_ _

_ _

9 23%

18 42%

27 33%

PHYSICAL SETTING/EARTH SCIENCE

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

33

32

1

1

32

33

21

12

33

10

23

33

TOTAL TESTED 55

29 88%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

29 88%

17 81%

12 100%

29 88%

8 80%

21 91%

29 88%

65

22 67%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

22 67%

12 57%

10 83%

22 67%

3 30%

19 83%

22 67%

85

5 15%

_ _

_ _

_ _

_ _

5 15%

2 10%

3 25%

5 15%

0 0%

5 22%

5 15%

32 of 45

REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY

REGENTS PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS

PHYSICAL SETTING/CHEMISTRY

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

49

49

2

1

46

49

29

20

49

15

34

49

TOTAL TESTED 55

48 98%

48 98%

_ _

_ _

_ _

48 98%

29 100%

19 95%

48 98%

14 93%

34 100%

48 98%

65

43 88%

43 88%

_ _

_ _

_ _

43 88%

24 83%

19 95%

43 88%

12 80%

31 91%

43 88%

85

19 39%

19 39%

_ _

_ _

_ _

19 39%

9 31%

10 50%

19 39%

3 20%

16 47%

19 39%

PHYSICAL SETTING/PHYSICS

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION

HISPANIC OR LATINO

WHITE

SMALL GROUP TOTAL

FEMALE

MALE




NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

15

15

1

14

15

8

7

15

5

10

15

TOTAL TESTED 55

15 100%

15 100%

_ _

_ _

15 100%

8 100%

7 100%

15 100%

5 100%

10 100%

15 100%

65

12 80%

12 80%

_ _

_ _

12 80%

5 63%

7 100%

12 80%

4 80%

8 80%

12 80%

85

2 13%

2 13%

_ _

_ _

2 13%

1 13%

1 14%

2 13%

0 0%

2 20%

2 13%

33 of 45

NEW YORK STATE ALTERNATE ASSESSMENT (NYSAA) RESULTS (2015 - 16)

GRADE 3 ELA

GRADE 3 MATH

GRADE 4 ELA

GRADE 4 MATH

GRADE 4 SCIENCE

GRADE 5 ELA

GRADE 5 MATH

GRADE 6 ELA

GRADE 6 MATH

GRADE 7 ELA

GRADE 7 MATH

GROUP

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

TOTAL TESTED

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

_%

PROFICIENT

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

LEVEL 1

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

LEVEL 4

34 of 45

NEW YORK STATE ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE ACHIEVEMENT TEST (NYSESLAT) RESULTS (2015 - 16)

GRADE 9

ALL STUDENTS

GENERAL EDUCATION

GROUP

1

1

TOTAL TESTED

_

_

ENTERING

_

_

EMERGING

_

_

TRANSITIONING

_

_

EXPANDING

_

_

COMMANDING

35 of 45

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: NO

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL


LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT


GROUP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

NO

―

NO

MADE AYP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

NO

―

NO

TESTED 95%

824*

3

10

6

5

775*

3

130*

0

477*

STUDENTS

ENROLLED DURING

THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION

PERIOD

92%*

―

―

―

―

92%*

―

85%*

―

92%*

PERCENT OF

ENROLLED

STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

NO

―

YES

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

366

2

8

5

5

344

2

56✝

0

218

TESTED STUDENTS

ENROLLED ON BEDS

DAY

102

―

―

―

―

100

―

38✝

―

86

PI

98

―

―

―

―

113

―

60

―

85

EAMO

92

―

―

―

―

92

―

47

―

79

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET

RESULTS FOR THE FOLLOWING GROUPS ARE NOT USED TODETERMINE AYP.

NOT AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

NOT BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

NOT HISPANIC OR LATINO

NOT ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PAC…

NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

818*

809*

812*

814*

27

818*

694*

824*

347*

438*

386*

0

824*

STUDENTS ENROLLED DURING THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION PERIOD

92%*

92%*

92%*

92%*

―

92%*

93%*

92%*

92%*

93%*

91%*

―

92%*

PERCENT OF ENROLLED STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

364

358

361

361

22

364

312

366

148

198

168

0

366

TESTED STUDENTS ENROLLED ON BEDS DAY

101

101

101

101

―

102

113

102

124

87

118

―

102

PI

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district withanother opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

36 of 45

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

NO

―

NO

MADE AYP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

NO

―

NO

TESTED 95%

823*

3

10

6

5

774*

3

130*

0

476*

STUDENTS

ENROLLED DURING

THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION

PERIOD

90%*

―

―

―

―

90%*

―

83%*

―

89%*

PERCENT OF

ENROLLED

STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

YES

―

YES

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

358

3

9

5

5

334

2

52✝

0

211

TESTED STUDENTS

ENROLLED ON BEDS

DAY

127

―

―

―

―

127

―

56✝

―

108

PI

95

―

―

―

―

109

―

61

―

83

EAMO

95

―

―

―

―

109

―

49

―

83

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET






NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

817*

808*

811*

813*

27

817*

693*

823*

347*

438*

385*

0

823*



90%*

90%*

90%*

90%*

―

90%*

91%*

90%*

91%*

90%*

89%*

―

90%*


VALID TEST SCORES

355

349

353

353

24

356

308

358

147

194

164

0

358


126

128

126

126

―

127

138

127

154

120

135

―

127

PI

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.*The percentage of students tested in the current year fell below 95 percent, so the numbers of enrolled and tested students in the current year and previous year were combined to provide the school/district withanother opportunity to meet the participation rate criterion.✝ Includes former students with disabilities because the number of students with disabilities in the current year is equal to or greater than 30.

37 of 45

ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE-LEVEL SCIENCE RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

YES

MADE AYP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

TESTED 80%

148

1

3

2

2

140

0

25

0

87

STUDENTS

ENROLLED DURING

THE TEST

ADMINISTRATION

PERIOD

90%

―

―

―

―

89%

―

―

―

93%

PERCENT OF

ENROLLED

STUDENTS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

NO

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

YES

PI >= EAMO OR

PROGRESS TARGET

128

1

3

2

2

120

0

21

0

78

TESTED STUDENTS

ENROLLED ON BEDS

DAY

166

―

―

―

―

166

―

―

―

160

PI

178

―

―

―

―

185

―

―

―

169

EAMO

170

―

―

―

―

170

―

―

―

153

PROGRESS TARGET






NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

147

145

146

146

8

148

123

148

61

73

75

0

148



90%

90%

90%

90%

―

90%

91%

90%

85%

88%

92%

―

90%


VALID TEST SCORES

127

125

126

126

8

128

107

128

50

64

64

0

128


166

166

167

166

―

166

173

166

176

170

163

―

166

PI

― There were fewer than 40 students enrolled during the test administration period, so the Percent of Enrolled Students with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 tested students enrolledon BEDS day and during the test administration period, so the PI, EAMO, and Progress Target data are suppressed.

38 of 45

SECONDARY-LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL ACCOUNTABILITY GROUPS MADE AYP: YES

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

MADE AYP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

TESTED 95%

46

0

0

1

0

45

0

5

0

21

12TH GRADERS

100%

―

―

―

―

100%

―

―

―

―

PERCENT OF 12TH

GRADERS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

47

0

0

1

0

46

0

7

0

20

2012

ACCOUNTABILITY

COHORT MEMBERS

155

―

―

―

―

154

―

―

―

―

PI

160

―

―

―

―

169

―

―

―

―

EAMO

155

―

―

―

―

154

―

―

―

―

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET






NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

46

46

45

46

1

46

41

46

25

23

23

0

46

12TH GRADERS

100%

100%

100%

100%

―

100%

100%

100%

―

―

―

―

100%

PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID

TEST SCORES

47

47

46

47

1

47

40

47

27

25

22

0

47

2012 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS

155

155

154

155

―

155

165

155

―

―

―

―

155

PI

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.

39 of 45

SECONDARY-LEVEL MATHEMATICS RESULTS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

MADE AYP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

TESTED 95%

46

0

0

1

0

45

0

5

0

21

12TH GRADERS

100%

―

―

―

―

100%

―

―

―

―

PERCENT OF 12TH

GRADERS WITH

VALID TEST SCORES

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

PI >= EAMO OR SAFE

HARBOR TARGET

47

0

0

1

0

46

0

7

0

20

2012

ACCOUNTABILITY

COHORT MEMBERS

140

―

―

―

―

139

―

―

―

―

PI

145

―

―

―

―

156

―

―

―

―

EAMO

135

―

―

―

―

135

―

―

―

―

SAFE HARBOR

TARGET






NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP

46

46

45

46

1

46

41

46

25

23

23

0

46

12TH GRADERS

100%

100%

100%

100%

―

100%

100%

100%

―

―

―

―

100%

PERCENT OF 12TH GRADERS WITH VALID

TEST SCORES

47

47

46

47

1

47

40

47

27

25

22

0

47

2012 ACCOUNTABILITY COHORT MEMBERS

140

140

139

140

―

140

153

140

―

―

―

―

140

PI

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2012 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and SafeHarbor Target data are suppressed.

40 of 45

― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.

UNWEIGHTED COMBINED ELA AND MATH PIS

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

102

―

―

―

―

100

―

38

―

86

ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL ELA PI

127

―

―

―

―

127

―

56

―

108

ELEMENTARY/ MIDDLE-LEVEL MATH PI

155

―

―

―

―

154

―

―

―

―

SECONDARY-LEVEL ELA PI

140

―

―

―

―

139

―

―

―

―

SECONDARY-LEVEL MATH PI

131

0

0

0

0

130

0

47

0

97

UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI

OVERALL GRADUATION RATE FOR ACCOUNTABILITY


ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

MADE AYP

― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.

41 of 45

FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:

72

0

1

2

0

69

0

9

0

23

2011 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL

COHORT

90%

―

―

―

―

90%

―

―

―

―

GRADUATION RATE

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

―

STATE STANDARD

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

―

PROGRESS TARGET

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

42 of 45

FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

ALL STUDENTS



HISPANIC OR LATINO


WHITE

MULTIRACIAL




GROUP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

MET GRADUATION-RATE CRITERION:

88

0

1

1

0

86

0

19

0

36

2010 FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL

COHORT

91%

―

―

―

―

91%

―

―

―

92%

GRADUATION RATE

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

80%

STATE STANDARD

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

80%

PROGRESS TARGET

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target. NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target. ― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

43 of 45

GRADUATION RATES FOR NON-AYP GROUPS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY





NOT WHITE

NOT MULTIRACIAL

GENERAL EDUCATION

ENGLISH PROFICIENT


MALE

FEMALE

MIGRANT

NOT MIGRANT

GROUP FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT

72

71

70

72

3

72

63

72

49

39

33

0

72

2011 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT

90%

90%

90%

90%

―

90%

94%

90%

92%

92%

88%

―

90%

GRADUATION RATE

FIVE-YEAR GRADUATION-RATE TOTAL COHORT

88

87

87

88

2

88

69

88

52

48

40

0

88

2010 FOUR-YEAR GRADUATION-RATETOTAL COHORT

91%

91%

91%

91%

―

91%

96%

91%

90%

88%

95%

―

91%

GRADUATION RATE

― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

44 of 45

© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: APRIL 26, 2017, 10:58 AM EST

Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability

Percentage of 2011 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2015 with:

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (THIS DISTRICT) 39%

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH AN ADVANCED DESIGNATION (STATEWIDE) 32%

PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE YES

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (THIS DISTRICT) 17%

REGENTS DIPLOMA WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT (STATEWIDE) 5%

PERCENTAGE IN THIS DISTRICT EXCEEDED STATEWIDE YES

45 of 45

FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY SUMMARY (2015 - 16)

INFORMATION ABOUT EXPENDITURE RATIOS (2014 - 15)(Data are lagged a year.)

Commissioner's Regulations require that certain expenditure ratios for general-education and special-education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districts

and all public schools. The required ratios for this district are reported below.

The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the State Aid Form F, the School District Annual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the

Student Information Repository System (SIRS).

THIS SCHOOL DISTRICT

GENERAL EDUCATION

INSTRUCTIONAL EXPENDITURES

$8,818,402

PUPILS

861

EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL

$10,242

SPECIAL EDUCATION


$3,475,152

PUPILS

135


$25,742

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPHIGH NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY RURAL

GENERAL EDUCATION


$1,561,573,974

PUPILS

149,618


$10,437

SPECIAL EDUCATION


$641,246,480

PUPILS

23,680


$27,080

1 of 3

ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS

GENERAL EDUCATION


$31,780,970,752

PUPILS

2,659,777


$11,949

SPECIAL EDUCATION


$13,848,179,596

PUPILS

451,571


$30,667

Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding Special Education) plus a proration of building level administrative and

instructional support expenditures. These expenditures include amounts for instruction of students with disabilities in a general-education setting. District expenditures, such as

transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.

The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the district pays tuition to another school district. This number represents all

pupils, including those classi ed as having disabilities and those not classi ed, excluding only students with disabilities placed out of district. Pupils resident in the district but

attending a charter school are included. For districts in which a county jail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth to whom the district must provide an education

program.

Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities (including summer special education expenditures) plus a proration of building-

level administrative and instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.

The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the school year plus students for whom the district receives tuition from another district plus

students for whom the district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the State schools at Rome and Batavia, private placements and out-of-state placements are included.

Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The total cost of instruction for students with disabilities may include both

general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in the general-education classroom may bene t students not classi ed as having disabilities.

TOTAL EXPENDITURES PER PUPIL


$22,811

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP

$22,078

NY STATE

$22,556

Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total Expenditures include district expenditures for classroom instruction, as well as

expenditures for transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration that are not included in the Instructional Expenditure values for General Education

and Special Education. As such, the sum of General Education and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures.

2 of 3

© COPYRIGHT NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

THIS DOCUMENT WAS CREATED ON: APRIL 26, 2017, 10:51 AM EST

INFORMATION ABOUT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES (2015 - 16)Commissioner's Regulations require reporting students with disabilities by the percent of time they are in general education classrooms and the classi cation rate of students with

disabilities. These data are to be compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The required percentages for this district are reported below.

STUDENT PLACEMENT (PERCENT OF TIME INSIDE REGULARCLASSROOM)

THIS SCHOOLDISTRICT

80% OR MORE

84 67.7%

40% - 79%

19 15.3%

LESS THAN 40%

20 16.1%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

0 0.0%

OTHER SETTINGS

1 0.8%

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUPHIGH NEED/RESOURCE CAPACITY RURAL

80% OR MORE

57.1%

40% - 79%

19.6%

LESS THAN 40%

20.6%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

2.1%

OTHER SETTINGS

0.6%

NY STATE

80% OR MORE

58.2%

40% - 79%

11.7%

LESS THAN 40%

19.9%

SEPARATE SETTINGS

5.3%

OTHER SETTINGS

5.1%

The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and veri ed in Veri cation Report 5. The counts are numbers of

students reported in the least restrictive environment categories for school-age programs (ages 6-21) on BEDS Day, which is the rst Wednesday of the reporting year. The percentages

represent the amount of time students with disabilities are in general-education classrooms, regardless of the amount and cost of special-education services they receive. Rounding of

percentage values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.

SCHOOL-AGE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES CLASSIFICATION RATE


13.1%

SIMILAR DISTRICT GROUP

15.0%

NY STATE

14.7%

This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of all school-age students in the school district, including students who are

parentally placed in nonpublic schools located in the school district. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district has Committee on Special Education (CSE)

responsibility to ensure the provision of special-education services. The denominator includes all school-age students who reside in the district. In the case of parentally placed

students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who attend the nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the

Basic Education Data System (BEDS).

Similar District Groups are identi ed according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information is available on our NRC capacity categories page.

3 of 3

http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/2011-12/NeedResourceCapacityIndex.pdf

spencer-van etten central school district 2017-18 budget ... · 2070 inservice training-instruction...

Documents