DOCUiENT RESUME

ED 1647 180 . RC 010 991

AUTHOR Friedman, Myron; And Others'TITLE_ Evaluation Design 19714=1979: ESAA Title I Migrant'

Program. Publicaltioi Number 78.11.INSTITUTION Austin Indeeende* School District; Tex. Office of

.

Research amd .valuation.SPONS'AGENCY Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,

Washington, D. C.PUB DATE 1. Oct 78 .

NOTE 60p.; Appendix marginally legible due to light type;BePt cogy available

,N

-

EDRS.PRICE MF-$0.8,3 HC-$3.50 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Bilingual Education; Componential Analysis;.Decision-p

Making; Educational Accountability; *EducationalAssessment; Elementary Secondary Education ;.*EvalUation Methods; Federal Programs; InformationNeeds; *Information SourCes; Medical Care, Evaluation;*Migrant Eddcation; Parent Participation; PreschoolEducation; Program Development:, *Program Evaluation;Student Recruitment

IDENTIFIERS ElergenCy School kid Act; *Migrant Programs; *Texas(Austin) .

ABSTRACT. 4

To collect and disseminate Information relevant to'the accountability and program components of the Title I MigrailtProgram in. the Austin school district and to report to the. TexasEducation Agency through interim and final'reports on how well the

rant program is meeting its stated objectives for 1978-79 are theunctions of file evaluation 'for which this "design is prepared. Theevaluation design focuses on the program's major-activities: studentrecruitment, parental involvement, instructional program frompre-kindergarten-through high school, and 'health and clothing supportservices. .For components of six major questions pertaining-to thecurrent.contract procedures used withfexternallyfunded 'personnel andthe program's instrctional, health services, parental involvement'components, the,evaluation design lists dates decisions are to bemade, dates information is needed, relevant evaluation questions andobjectives, and-information sources..The eyaluation design describeshow the following.data will be collected: (1) needs assessmentdata number of-migrant students enrolled in the district and where,their achievement*levels, ind degiee to-which migrant students areserved by other compensatory programs; (2),prOcgss data - -how wellproposed activities are implemented; and (3)' omtcome;data,7-programimpact on achievement of migrant students,. An,s. line-of theevaluation time resources allocation for persorilel ip included:.(RS) ; -44

, r

*********************************#,i******####***###*****************##* Reproductiong supplied by EDAS are the best .thatscan'be iade

from the original document.**************i*******************************44*********************

"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

;" a 114. I IQ

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERICI ANDUSERS OF THE ERIC SYSTEM."

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.EDUCATION I. WELEARE

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OFEDUCATION

t " THIS -DOCumENT HAS BEEN REPRO-'T DUCE°, EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM

THE OR OR.GANIZAT iON.OR 'GIN.ATM,* IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONSSTATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRE-SENT4oFFICIAt. NATIONAL iNsTiT.UTE OFEDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY

-

BOARIYCiF TRUSTEE

-Gustavo L Garcia; ,President

teverend C. Griffin, Vice President

Jerry Nugent, Secretary

EVALUATION DESIGN,-. .1978-1979

.4 /

ESAA Title I Migrant. Program' October 1, 1978

t

Myron Friedman i Ezra Gottheil. Data Ahalyst

Myna L4gan Kelly Jordan

Senior Eva3iiiator' Secretary

Approved:

\ , I

Frdda M. Holleyi Ph.D.Director, OfficeVf.Research-and Evaluation

'Publication Number: 78.11

ACK&OWLEDPiMENT AND DISCLOSE

. .

11

e

. The project presented or reported'hereinperformecipursuant to a Grant

.from the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. However, the opinions

expregted heiein do not necessarily reflect the posiqpn or. policy of-the'

:Department and -no loffici4,endorSement by 'the Department should be inferred.

;,

41.

0

r

A

7811

PROGRAM STAFF.

The, following Austin 'Independent School District staff members- re

responsible.for-the implementation of the Title I Migrant Pro am.

. -

Oscar CantuTitle I/Title I Migrant:Administrator

-Jose MataMigrant Coort4nator

Kathleen Aryan R.N.Migrant Pediatric Nurse PractitLoner

Alicia TalamantezMigrant .Parent Involvement Specialist 4,

JA

78.11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

.

I. Evaluation Design-Review Form 1

,.;.

II. Narrative SummaryA. PrOgram Summary ..,)- . 2

Bi-., Evaluation Summary . 3

...

III. G Decision Questions -

; A. Questions Addressed 6

B. Overview . . . . . .

-..

7a.

IV. 'Information NeedsA. Needs. . . . .

13,

Br.. Overview 15.

23V. Dissemination

Via Information Sour as Summary 24.

VII. Data'To Be Collected In The. SChools 28'5 .1

vo

VII. Evaluation Time Resources Allocation Summary

a

.7

- I

4 r

iii r;

.

/ V

EVALUATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM -

The followlypersons have been provided with an opportunity to reviewand to mak...e comments on pertinent sections of this-design.

Mauro Reyna, Assistant SuperintendentDivision of Educatio2a1 Development

Lavrence Buford,.Director of Secondary Educatio

M. G. Bowden,Director-of Elementary Education

Lee Laws,Diredtor of Developmental Programs

Oscar Cantu,Title .I/Title I Migrant Administrator

Jose Mata,Migrant Program Coordinator

Kathleen Bryan;Migrant Nurse

Alicia TalamantezParental InvolvementSpecialist

/John Belle,/JohnDirector

Ed Leo,-ADea;Director

Roberta Hartung,Area Director

40.

O

4 I 6

Maud Sims; Assistant-Director of Secondary Education

Bertha Means,Secondary Reading Coordinator

-Itirgaret.Ruska, SecondaryLanguage Arts Coordinator

Yolanda Leo,Instructional Coordinator

LudySahraie,InstrUctiOnal.Coordinator

Timy Baranoff,Instructional Coordinator

Ida Hunt,Instructional Coordinator

La Vonne Rogers,Instructional Coordinator-

Paola Zinnecker,,Instructional Coordinator

Elementary. Principals.'With a Migrant Teacher.-

Secondary PrincipalsWith a Migrant Teacher

s

I1A

PROGRAM SUMMARY

%

The Title I Migrant, Program is a rapidly growing, federally funded_zrogramwithin the Austin Independent SchoOl District which is designed to meet theunique needs of the District's migrant students. Funds to aid in-the; educa-tion of migrant students are made available to'the states base4 on the Number -

of students who are home-based within each state. The Texas Education Agencythen allocates the Texas funds to local districts bated on:district need andprogram quality.. Both Currently migratory and formerly migratory childrenmay be served by'the Migrant Program. A currently migratory child is one' -*

(a) whose parent or guardian isa migratory agricultural worker or migratoryfisherman; and (b) who has within the, past twelve months moved from one'scHooldistrict into another in order 'to enable the child, the child'siguardian, ora. member. of the:child's-intediate fatily to obtain temporary or seasonalemployment in an agricultural or fishing activity. The term "agriculturalactivity" mean& "anyactivity. related to crop. production (including preparingsoil and, storing, curing, canning, or freezing of crops); any activity'related to the productionand processing of milk, poultry, and livestock (forHuman consumption); and any operation involved in forest nurseries and fishfarms." ,A.formerly migratory 'child is one who has migrated within the last.five years.,

The level ol ainding.forthe Migrant, Program in 1977-78 was about $500,000.For the 1978-79 school year, the funding level hasrisen to'slightly morethan $800,000.

, The activities-of the Migrant Program are centered, around

a) recruitment of:students and parental involvement,.b) an instructional) program from pre-kindergarten through

high school, andc). health and clothing support servic es.

Recruitment and Pa rental. Involvementa

It is the responsibility of.the Migrant Parent Involvement Specialist, fivecommunity representatives, and two Migrant Student ReCord Transfer.System(HSIkTS) 'clerks, to see .-iiiat-a-migrarit .students in the'.District-are regi8-

tered the program each year. In odder to-be eligible for the servicesrOvide by the Program, the parents of the studenti must complete a Cer-

-.4tif'ta e of Eligibilitir/Identification. Ins signing this fcTm. the parents

'"ter-t that\their. children have met thedefinition of a migrant student.Using t1 previous-year's list Of`migrant students and other sources, theParent Involvement Specialist any community represent:: ''es begin raringhome vistas to'regitter students prior tp the beginni:- the school'year.When the Eligibility/IdenWication forms have been -red,' they are

seAt-by the MSRTS clerks'tp the Region XIII Education Se_ :Low: Center forentry into the MBIFS data bank in Little Rock, Arkansas. In addition, theMSRTS. clerks see tht educational and health information in the data bank

,'

.78.11,

is updated on a periodic basis and maintain lists of registered migrant-- students by family and by school.

The-Migrant Program is also required by federal guidelinesto establishParent' Advisory Councils at each local campus with a Migrant teacher andfor the District as a whole. The PACs provide the parents of migrant stu-dents and other community members with an opportunity to learn more about

- the Migrant-Program (its purpose and what it offers) and a mechanism foradvising the Diitrict in-its operation of the-program and its planning forthe future. It'is the-responsibility of the Parent Involvement Specialistand the community representatives to see that the PACs are established andoperate in accordance with federal regulations.

Instructional Program

Rte-kindergarten: The Migrant Program currently has eight pre-kindergartenclasses,1 two more, then last year. The pile-kindergarten program is for stu-dents four years old. The current campuses with pre-k classes are Oak Springs,Allison, Dawson, Mathews, Metz; Brooke, Brentwood, and St. Elmo. Each pre -kclassroom is staffed with a teacher, and an instructional aide. The pre-kindergarten program uses a bilingual curriculum developed by the SouthwestEducational Development Laboratory.

Grades K-5: The Migrant Program will have a Migrant teacher idach-of thefollowing schools: Allison, Becker,'Brooke, Dawson, Ortega. The instruc-tidttl emphasis will be Oral /Written Communication through the Title Iinstructional model adopted byfeach school.

Grades 6: 'The Migrant'ProgrA will have one Migrant teacher at the TravisHeights SI.xth Grade-School this year. There the .instructional emphasis will!'also on Oral/Written Communication. Mig,ant sixth graders at. Allan, and

Martin w so be served by the Migrant teachers at thiir campuses. Therethe TNtructional emphasis will be on Oral Language Development.

Grades 7-12: The instructional emphasis at grades 7-12 will be Oral Lan- -

guage Development. The teachers at thiS level will be using A Guide toOral Language in the Migrant Program developed bythe Migrant Program.Secondary Migrant teachers for 1978-79,wil1 be found at Allan, Fulmore\,and Martin Junior Highs and at Travis and Johnston (two teachers) HighSchools. Migrant students at other schools-are expected to be served by ,-other compensatory programs.

Health and Clothing Servicesr,i

, ,

i

,

e

The Migrant Program also provides_healtikand clothing benefits to Migrant' students whO.are in need of theM. To receive the benefits, however, thestudents must be served by a compgnsatory education program such as theMigrant Program, Title I Regular, or the Title VII Bilingual Program. The

Pediatric Nurse Practitioner employed by the. Migrant Program screens andexamines migrant studehts and makes referrals to physicians and dentistsas needed. 'Funds from the Migrant Program are used to pay physician anddentist fees, lab fees,,and to purchase glasseS.fr--\

O

78.11

\ f'Clothing can also be provided to migrant students as the need arises. This

is usually handled through the community representatives upon the recommendation of the Migrant teachers. -

.'

A

s.

I

4

r

'sr

z.

78.11tVALUA-TION SUMMARY

. ..y.

The evaluation of the Migrant Program for 1978-79 has two main functions:__---

.

a) to collect and disseminate information relevant to thedecision questions outlined in this document,

b) to report to the Texas Education Agency eseS interimand final evaluation reports on how well th MigrantProgram is meeting its stated objectives.

In carying out these functicr Migrant Evaluation will collect threebasic types of data; needs G,,,-...,ssment data, proce.ss data, and-outcome

data. The needs assessment data will include such thingsias-how many,migrant students are enrolled in the District and where, What theirachievement levels are this year,-and the degree to which-migrant studentsare being'served by other compensatory prOgrams.

Process data provides inf4imation about how well the activities proposed---/or the Program are being implemented. Data in this category includeuvarent

and teacher questionnaires, classroom ob-serVationemia PAC meeting records.. '.

.

)The outcome'data will indicate the extent to whidh the agrant Programhas hadAn impact on the achievement of migrant students. The CaliforniaAchieveqent Tests and the mastery tests,of the Bilingual Early Childhood

i Program will be the measures used.

4

-44

5

78.11

I '4

(

DECISION. QUESTIONS ADDRESSED

A. Accountability Questions

Dl. Should the current contract porcedures used withexternally funded personnel be modified?

B. PrIIgram Questions

D2. Should the Pre-K instructional component be continuedas it is, modified, expanded, or deleted?

4 ID3.. Should the K-5.ins_tructional component be continued

as it is, modified,'expanded, or deleted?

D4. Should the Secondary instrUctionalcomponent,becontinued as it'is,'modified, expanded, or dOleted?

D5.. Should the Health Se vices compatientlbepcontinued asit "is, modified, expanded, or deleted?

Db. Should the Parental Involvement component be continuedas it is, modified, expanded; c .r. deleted?. .

'.,

12

1 '

:m113 -

DECISION QUEOIONS OVER,YIEW:7

1

a

,

.i , .

-

'9ECISION;QUESTIONS :t

DATE p

BE '

DECIDED

DATE

INARMATION

IS NEEDED.

,,10,

...

RELEVANT EVALUATION, .

' QUESTIONS AND OBJECTIVES..

.

.

INFORMATIO SOURCES:,

Accountability Questions

.

DI. Should the current contract proce-

iluresuted with externally funded

personnel be modified?

.

.

'.0

i:,..

,

ro

.

.

System' uestions

..

..

D2I Should the Pr - instructional

,component be continued as it is;

. modified, expanded, or deleted?

4

. ,

August

'1979-

,

f

Jebruary

and

August

1979

.

. June

: 1979'

#

f

,

.

4,

.,

January

and ,

June

1979

t.,:.

c''

.. *, 0, afi

) f

'

D1-1: What contract.proceudures are'currently,. .

used With exrernalVfunded personnel?

,.

.

.....

D1-2. Are the personnel' evaluation ratings'.4

received by externally funded teachers

, in Title I, Title 1 rant,' and SCE

schools different th those received.4

by locally funded personnel in compar-

able positions?1

$.

D13. Do externally funded teachers in Title I

.'Title' I Migrant, and SCE schools differ

from loclly.funded teachers on such

demographic,variableS as years of teach-

ill experience, degrees, ethnicity,' etc.?

.

D1-4. Wiat is the effect of the current con-

tract policy upon externally funded

professional personnel? ,

.

.

.

.

D2-I. Were the achievemeniobjectiVes met?

, i

, a. Upon completion of the required

units, the participants.in the pre=

dendergarten program will Master an,

average of 10 of the'12 items on

thstery Pests Cand It and 8 of the

10 items on Mastery Test III of the '

".

SEDL Bilingual Early Childhood Pro-

gram Curriculum. .

.

D2-2. 'Were the decisions made in the 1978

DecisOns Process implemented?

..

a) Jnter4few with the Assistant.f

Director of Special Area ,

Personnel -.

a} Personnel Evaluation Tiles

,

, ,

,

a) DistriePersOnnel Files

f

,

4 Eiternally Funded Professional

PersonnelInterview/Questionnaire,

.0

.

.

.,

,

a) BECP Mastery Tests

,

.

w,

%

;,..

,

,

a) To be determined

IIIB

DECISION QUESTIOtiSIOVERVIEW

DECISION QUESTIONS

DATE TO

BEdDECIDED

DATE

1NFORMATI

IS NEEDED

Yi RELEVANT EVAL1ATION

i QUESTIONS AND OBJECTIVES

INFORMATION' SOURCES'

`.1.

3. ,Shonlithe K-5 instructional cam-

potent be-continued as it is,

modified, expanded, or deleted?

FebruaY.

and

August .

1919'

January

and

June

1979

, (

.

02 -3. What been the long term effect of

participation in the Pre4.programl,'

D2-4. Were any problems encountered by,the

K teachers in thd implementation* the

Pre-K Program?

a. llow helpful were the parent helpers?

b. Was staff Aelopment timely and

helpful?

c.' What instructional supervision was

provided.to,Migrant teachers?

d. What are `t! perceived needs of

the MIgraniteachers,auper-

vision?

e. What Supervisan shoUld be provided to

$ the Migrant teachers, ho should

provide the sUpervision?"

A

D3-1, Mere the achievement' objectivemet?

S. 4 .

a.Kindergarten:. By February of the

1978-79 schbokyear, those migrant

kindergarten students served by the

Migrant Program All demoastrite an

underitanding of basic concepts by

scoringanihveragee0in o(6.5 points

Iitween-Pre and post. dainistratrOps'

'of the Boehm Test of Besikodapts.

b. 'Firit Grade: By Apr 1 of flee 1978-79

..school year, those first-grade stu-

dents :served by the Migrant Program'

Will.demonstrate a basic'knowledge of

readinOtscoring an average grade

equivalent within one month of that

,expected fokstudents in the eighth

month of thg,first as measured by ,a

single administration of the Califor-

nia AchievementIest (Reading.Sectioi

'n A ril 1979. .

b)

c)

d)

Pre -K Longitudinal Files.

,c

Migrant Student Atteidance Form.

Migrant Teacher .Questionnaire!

NiOnt Parent Questionnaire

Migrant Principal ,Questionnaire

Migrant Conrdinatq Questionnaire

), Boehm Test of Bake Concepts

a) California Achievement Testsf

OP.

4

15tr

ro

c DECISION QUESTIONS ovEnVIEW'

'V 4

ti

r

DECISION QUESTIONS

4

I

DATE TO

. BE

DECIDED

DATE

INFORMATION

IS NEEDED

RELEVANT EVALUATION

QUESTIONS AND OBJECTIVES

4a.1 INFORMATION SOURCES

A 6

c. Grades 2 through 5: By April of'the

1918-79 school year, those migrant

students in grades 2 through 5-who

are served by the Migrant. Program

will dembnstraie'a gain .of 0.8 months

of reading achievement per month of

instruction as measures by the Read

ing.Section of the California

AchieVement Test (combined vocabulary

and comprehension iubtestS)..

Were the d'ecisions made in the J978

Decision Ilocess Implemented?

D3-3. Were any problems.encountered in the

implementation of the I(-5 program?

'

a. How often do students receive instruc

tion from the Migrant teacher and how

much instructional time do they

receive? How much time is'spent on

Oral languege Development and other '

activities?

. b. How does the instruttionProvided by

-. 'the YUgrant teacher supplement the

student's regular instructional

program?

c How successfully was .the program

implemented'at each.campus for each

'grade?. . 1

d. Was staff :development timely and

helpful? ,

s.

What instructional supervision waa

provided. to Migrant tea-tilers?

'T. What are'the Perceived needs of the

Migrant' teaehers for supervision?

d. WhiniuperVisionshould be provided

to. die Miibant teachers,' who should'

rovide the su ervision?

a) California Achievement Tests

a) -To 6' ,determined:

a) Migrant Student Attendance form'

b) Migrant :Teacher Questionnaire

c) .ClassrOom Observations

a) All of, the.above

b) Teacher Questionnaire ,

.11) All ortheabor

.

.

1.

a) Migrant Teacher Questionnaire

b) .Principal Questionnaire

c) Migrant Coordinator Questionnaire

a) All of thAbove

a) All of t6 above

a) All .of the 'aboVe

.11113

:11)CISION.OliESTIONS,oytnyiEw

O.

pEculut QUESTIONS 1

DATE TO

BE '

DECIDED

101E

INFORMATION

IS NEEDED

RELEVANT EVALU4T1ON

,QUESTIONS AND OBJECTIVES c

D4. Should the Sicondary instructional February

component be continued as it is, and

codified, expantl, or deleted? ', August

.,"%. 1979,

4

January

Pld

June :

1979

D4-1. Were the achieveient objectives met?

.4 .

a. Oral Language Development/Reading:

As of April of tilt 1918 -19 school 'c

year., those secondary migrant stu- .

dents who are served by ,the Migrant

Program will deionstrate a gain of

0.8 months 'per month of instruction

as measured by the vocabulary subtest

Of the Cal rnia Achievementqest.

D4-2 Were t decisions made in the 078

Decision Process implemented?

04-3. Were any problems encountered in the

implementation of the Secondary.program?

a. .

How often do students, receive instruc

tion from the Migrant teacheyne

how/where'is that instruction

received?,/

b. How does the instruction .provided by

the Migrant teacher supplement'the-.

studenei regular instructional pro-

gram?

c. To what extent are informal assess-

ment instruments being used by the

Migrant teacher to place students.at

ah instructional level?

d. How effectively was the program imple

merited at each .campus for each grade?

e. Was staff development timely and

helpful?1

f. What instructional supervision was

.

provided to the Migrant teachers?

g. What are the perceived needs of the

Migrant teachers ler supervision?

1 ,.,INFO T1ON 011E(CES"

California Achievement Test

'1

To be determin&I,

a) -Migrant Student Attendanfe Form

4:1.eacher:Questionnaire

b) Migrant Teacher Questionnaire

a) MigrantStudent Folders

b) .Migrantf

Teacher Questionnaire

a) Allotthe above ,

. ,

a)

b)

c)

a)

Migrant Teacher Questionnaire

PtinCipal 'Questionnaire

Migrant Coordinator Questionnaire

All of the above

) All of the above

20

I

14

1 4

1 15) IIIB

DECISIpN QUESTIONS OVERJEWCO

1c, .>

. - ..

. DECISION QUESTIONS.D

. , °

DATE TO

BE

DECIDED

DATE

INFORMATION

IS NEEDED

RELEVANT EVALUATION

' QUESTIONS AND OBJECTIVESi .- .

.

INFORMATI6N SOURCES ,

.

;

./. , .

4. .

D5. Should the Health Services component,

Prbe continued as it is, modified

expanded; or deleted? ,...).

4l'.

,

... ,.

,

' '

,

.

C,.

,.

.

,

1' ...v. ,

; ,w

.A.

- 1 ,

'"'4'

, , ,

D6. Skouldthe Patentalnvolvement cur

ponent be icons d as it'im, 1

Mcrdified,'expand , or deleted? ,

75-

4

.

1

.

February

and

.August

1979

I:

.

,,

February

and

August

1979

.

1. ..

i

,

V

Japary

and:.

June

1979

January'

and

June

1979

.

'o h.\ What supervision should be. provided

j

j

to the Migrant teachers, who should

d, provide the supervision? .t.,

,

.

I

D474. What alternatives are available forproviding supplementary, instruction on

the Secondary level? 4

D5-1. Were the component's objectives met?

*

ae During the 1978-79 school year, the

Migrant nurse will pr vide health

.

services to 75% of the students on a

campus with ,migrant instructional

staff (R:12)..

b. Thm,,Migrant3urse will provide health

roservices to,o9Di of the Pre -K students

in 'the Migrant Program

p5 -2. Were the decisions made in he 1978.

Decision Process implemented?.

't )

D5 -3.';, Were any problems encountered in the

implementation of the Health services'

cOmp8aent? ..

D6 -1. Were the component's objective met?

,

a. Parental Involvement Component: By'

.

,,

a) Migrant Teacher Questionpaire

b) Principal Questionnaire

c) Migrant Coordinator Questionnaire

1.,

a) Survey of Mi t Progran%n .

Other School D tricts1

L.-

,

1

,

,

a) Health Services, Form

b) Medical Expenses Form. ..

c) Migrant Student Master File

.4,

,,

.

'1 .

a) To be determined

. , 4

a) Migrant Teacher Questionnaire

b) Migrant Nurse Questionnaire

c) Migrant Parent Questionnaire

0...

,

) PAC Data: Agendas, Minutes,,

Roster, .

t

.

a) Migrant Student:Att4dance Form

b) Migrant Tgicher Questionnaire

cc Migrant Parent Questionnatre

,

October of the. 1978-79 school year,

the Parental Involvement personnel

lo. will establish local Title I Migrant

PAC oplocal Title I/Title I Migrant

ACIeLrbordination with Title I

.,peinhk..i.in-accordance with TEA.

b. 'ilre-K teallers.willta' 'wit the

"Hari AttpAties for'Par ts" Ithe

.parents of, at least,50% bf the

) children in theirl,classes

sworams6megorwromonvinunimilownwhawanprolawil

61

*.

ri

"

DECISION QUESTIONS OVERVIEW

.DECIP. QUESTION.4. 4 '

.

,

DATE TO

BE

DECIDED

DATE

INFORMATION

1SNEEDED

. RELEVANT EVALUATION

'quEsTioNs AND oupives 4

.

. g

.

.

INFORMATION SOURCES

.-

'4'r,

.

.

(

'

.

g

;

1?,

,

.

*a,

.

\..1

4

1 I

1

s

i

.

..

t

.

'

.

.

.

.

o

.

,

'....

.

.

.

.

I

.

a

.

.

e

i .)

,...,..

.

.

. .., . ,

.

,

c. The Title I Migrant

Representatives

training for parents

grades K-12 at

-. least twice during,the

D6-2. ,Were the decisions made

recision Process implemented?

,

D6-3. Were any problems encountered

implementation'of the

ment component?

.

a. Were clothing purchases

efficiently?

L. What was the

requests made?.

2., For what percentage

requests were

b, Was the. recruitment

handled efficiently?

, 1. By what date1students identified?

2. What percentage

. students were

this year?

.

.

t

Community

will conduct parent

.of students ,

each local PAC at

school year.

in the. 1978

in the

Parental Involve-

handled

°

total number of

of the

purchases made?

procedure.

were 90Z of the

of last year's.

registered again

.

'.), Parent Training Evaluation Forms

b) Migrant Parent Questionnaire '

.:,,

.

a) To be determined

,

a) -PAC Data

b) PAC Officer Questionnaire

c) Migrant Teacher Questionnalie

d) Migrant Parent Questionnaire

,

a) Migrant Student Master File

W. Clothing Form

.f

%

.

Migrant Student Master File

.

.,

dI

l

I

23

78.1k IVA (

INFORMATION' NEEDS

Annual Evaluation Re olrt for the Texas Education Agency,Term, 1978:

7

.11.- Haw many migrant students were served by instructional and/or support-components of the Migrant Program by grade and

r^". ethnicity during the summer term?

1.

ti

.12. To what extent have the objectives been attained?

Needs Assessment Document

113. How many migrant studentewill be enrolled in each school bygrade in the 1979-80 academic year?

14. .What is the achiement level of the migrant saidents byschool and grade? How do they-cappare-Wiih the distriptaverage?

What compensatory programs serve migrant students'at eachgrade for each schoolg how Many migrant students are serve4by each?

e

What'health and clothing needs have been identified for themigrant students?

Addendum t4o Annual Evaluation Report for the. Texa,,Education tgency

17. Delineate factors which enhanced the effectiveness of ea h ofthe .compOnents in the 1977-79 program.

Delineate. factors which reduced the effectiveness of eachcomponent in the 1977-78 program.

I *1979-80 Title I Migrant Application to the Texas'Education.ArJey

I9. Are the objectives in each of'the proposed-components written1P in a clear and precise manner? Are the intended activities'c . measurable?

'

.31

110. -Haw will the objectives in'each of the components be evaluated?

III. What are the proposed objectives for the 1979 -80 evaluationcomponent?

What.iSe proposed budget for the 1979-80 evaluation'component?

78.11

4

Annual Evaluation Report for the Texas Education Agency

113. How many migrant students were'served by instructional and/orsupport components of the Migrant Piogram by grade and !-

ethnicity during 1978 -79 ?.

114- How many par=dnts Mere involyed in each component ?

115. Hoar many students have received medical andfor_dentaltreatment provided through Migrant funds?

116. How many migrant students participate in instructional com-

(/ponents funded by other compensatory programs?

117. How many migrant students participate Plan A or'Planspecial education programs'

,118. What was the average gain, in Bade equivalents, of migrantstudents at each grade level?"

119.. To what extent have the objectives for each component beenattained?

4

a

)

14

I V U

INFORMATION NEEDS. OVERVIEW

INFORMATION NEED

DATE

INFORMATION

NEEDED

I4. What is the achievement level of

the migrant" students by school and

grade ?. How do they compare with

the district average?

15. What capensatory programs serve

migrant students. at each grade for

each school; how many migrant

sttdeuts are served bY'each? /

16. What health and clothing needs

have been identified for the

migrant students?

Addendum to Annual Evaluation Report

for the Texas Education Agency

17. Delineate factors which enhanced

the, effectiveness of,eacil of the

components'in the 1977-78 program.

18. Delineate factort which reduced

the effectiveness of each compo-

nent in the 1977-78 program.

D.: 1979-80 Title I Migrant Application

19. Are the objectives in each of the

proposed components written in a.

clear and precise manner? Are

the intended activities meastir-

able?,

2-1 79A

2-1-79

2-1-79

2-1-79

2-1-79

INFORMATION SOURCE

a) Migrant Student Master. File.

b) Boehm Test of -BaSic Concepts

) Metropolitan Readiness Test

d)., California Achievement Tests

e) Sequential Tests of Educational Progress

a) Migrant Student ,Master File

b) Compensatory Programs Master List

a) Health Services Form

b) Medical Expenses Form

Title I Migrant Final Evaluation Report tor,

TEA, June, 1978

.

) I Migrant' Final Report and Final ,Technical

Report, June, 1978

) Title I MigranUinal Evaluation, Report for

: ,

) Title ,1 Migrant Final Report and Final Technical

Report, June; 1976

1979-80 Title. I Migrant Application

INFORMATION NEEDS OVERVIEW 4,

INFORMATION NEED

DATE

INFORMATION

NEEDED,

INFORMATION SOURCE

A. Annual Evaluation Report for the Texas

Education' Agency, Summer Term, 1978 ;,

How many migrant studenti. were

Served by instructional and/or

support Components of the Migrant.

Program by .grade and ethnicity

during the summer'term,?!

1,0'

12. To what extent have'the objectives

been attained?,

,

,

. By the end,of.the summer pro-

I?

zram, the migrant chi dr6n at

the rprerkindergarte level '

will Wthe,average demonstrat(

a statiklcally significant

gain in language skills'' as

measure `by administrations

of,lhe Test ofjtasic Experi

'ences .(T0.13E) La*age Test at

the beginning and end of. the

*summer school term.

agrant secondary students

will be registered .and attend,

classes offered through AISD

regular'summer prograi classes

and credit will be received in

80% of the total. course begun.

B. Needs Assessment Document

13. How many migrant students will be

enrolled in each school by grade

(1 in the: 1979-80 academic year?

8-31-78

8-31-78

8-31-78

2-1-79

Summer School Rosters

,4(

) TOBE - Language Test

Summe, .School.Rosters

Migrant Student Master File-.

I

INFORMATION NEEDS OVERVIEW

INFORMATION NEED '

1 /

DAZE

INFORMATION

NEEDED.

INFORMATION SOURCE

I10:' How will the objectives yin each of

the componenes be evaluated?

Ill. What are the objectives for the

1979-80 evaluation component?

I12, What is the proposed budget for,

the 1979-80 evaluation component?'

E. Tau .EducatiOn Agency, Annual Report.

-;,

I13. How many 'Agent students were

serve. instructional'and/or

support ;components the Migrant

Program bY4rade and ethnicity

during 1978-79?

114. How any parents were involved in

each component?

many'studeniihave,received,

medical and/or dental.treatment,6'

provided through migrant fundi?

How many migrant -student's partici-

pate 4,initructional components,

funded by other compensatory

programs?

. .

I17. How many migrant students partici-

pate in Plan A or Plan B special

education progtams?

.Wh4 .was the averagejain'in grade

equivalents, of migrant.studentS at1 :each grade:level?.,:'

2-1-79

24.79'

5+79

5-1-79

5-1-79

5-1-79

a) 1.979 -80 Title Iligraat Application',

i) 1979-80 TitleI Migrant Application

°.!.)

,a). 1979780 Title I Migrant Application'

a) Migraat Student Attendance Form

b) Health Services Form ,

c) Medical Expenses Form

d) Clothing Purchases Forms

a) (Migrant Student Attendance. Form

a) Medical Expenses Form

0'

10110101.11M

a) Migrant Student Master File'

b) compensatory,Programs Mastei,List

a) Special Educition File

5-1-79 a) Boehm Test of Basic'Concepts

bl California Achievement Tests,

32

IVb

INFORMATION. NEEDS OVERVIEW

INFORMATION NEED,

.u.mrrrrrrmmwrrrm..iwmuxpmnwmp;

119. To what extent have the objectives

foY each,component been attained?

. Pre-Kindergarten Component.

Upgn completion of the '

required units, the partici-

pants in. the pre-kindergarten

progI;Im will master; an average

of 10, of: the 12 items on

Mastery Tests I and II and 8

of the 10 items on Mastery

Test III of the. SEDL,Bilingual

Early Childhood Program"

.Curriculum.

b. Oral/Written Communications

I. Kindergarten: By, February

of the 1978-79 school year,.

those migrant kindergarten

students served by the Migrafit

Program will demonstrate an

understanding of basic con-

cepts by scoring an average

gain ,of 6.5 points between pre

and Pos7%dminietrations of

.the Boehm Test 'of Basid' Gon-

cepts.

2. First Grade: "By April of

the 1978-79 sdhool year, those

first grade students served by

the Migrant ,Program will dem!-

oastrate a basic:knowledge.a.

reading by scoring an average

grade equivalentwithin

month'cif that"expecfed,fk,,

DATE

INFORMATION

NEEDEDi

INFORMATION SOURCE

5-1-79

5-1-79

5-1-79

5-1-79

a) BECP Mastery Tests

TestBOehm Test of Basic Concepts

California Achievement Tests

,

INFOR

INFORMATION NEED .

students in the eightb Month.

of the first as measured by a

single administration of the

California Achievement,Test,

(Reading Section) in April,

1979,

3. Grades 2 through 5: By

April of the 1978-79 school

year, those migrant students

in grades two through,five--

who are served by the Migrant'

Program will demonstrate a

gain of 0:'8 months orreading

achievement per month of

instruction: as measured by the

California Achievement Test

(combined vocabulary and

comprehension subtvs).

c. Oral Language Development',

Reading. A'

As of April of the 1978-79

school year,-those secondary

migrant students who are

'serf by' the Migrant Program

wili onstrate a gaipif'0.8

Oaths er. month:of instruc-

tion as easured by the

vdcabulaty subtest of the Cali

fornia Achievement Test.

. Health' Services Component%

r

During the 1978-79 school year

the Migrant nurse will provide.

N NEEDS OVERVIEW

'PA15.

INFO TION

NEEDEP

INFORMATION SOURCE

(

5-1-79

5-,1-79

5 -1 -79

1.

a) ',California Achievement Tests

a) California Achievement Tests

a

a) Iiealth Services Form

b) Medical Expenses Form JU

c) Migralit Student Master File .

!'41

INFORMATION. NEEDS OVERVIEW

INFORMATION NEED )

At

DATE

INF,0RMATION

NEEDED,

INFORMATION SOURCEco

( , ,

health services to 75% of the

students on a campus with

migrant instructional taff

(K-12).

The Migrant Nurse will provide

health services to 90% of the

Pre -K students in the Migrant

Program.

e. Parental Involveme Component

1

By 'October of the 1978 -79

school yeat,4the Parental

AnVolvement'personnel will

establish local Title I

Migrant PAC or local Title fi

Title I Migrant PAC" in coordi-

riationWith Title I personnel'

accordance with TEA'regu-

lations.,

Thqr0-1(teachets,Will.imple7,

sent 'the "Home ActiVities for.

Parents" with parents of at

least 50% of the children in

theit claSses.

The Title I Migrant Community

Representatives will conduct

patent training for parents .

of students grades K-12 at

each local PAC at least twice

during the school year.

5-1-79

5-1=79

5-1-79

1

a) PAC. Data: Agendas, Minutes, Rosters

A

a), Migrant Student Attendance Totm

b) Migrant Teacher Questionnaire

c) Migraat Parent Questionnaire

..a)' Parent Trdining EValuatiOn.Forms

b) Migrant'Parent,Questionnaire

INFORMATIOli NEEDS OVERVIEW

INFORMATION NEED

+.00

r. ,

4 ,

4. I

f. MSRTS Component

W in ,two weeks after migrant

students arrive inn .the school

district, eligibility forms

for these,, students will be .

transmitted io the ESC termi-

nal site. Identification and

recruitment of migrant stu-

dents will continue through7

out the'year, to include

transmitting the eligibility

forms to the terminal on a

continuous? year-round basis.

By Februaiy 1, 1979, all

initial update (medical and

instructional). informatiol,

will hive been transmitted to

the ESC terminal site. Up-

*ting'informatiOn will be

transmitted to the terminal

site in a tiWy fashion,,.

continuously/during the .year.

DATE

INFORMATION,

NEEDED

r.

INFORMATION SOURCE

,571779 a) ,Migrant Student Master File .

b) ESC Terminal Repords.

5-1-79

//--

ESC TOminal Records

Within a week after migrant

students withdraw, from school,

-final update and Odrawl

information will have been

transmitted to the terminal

site.

Evaluation Component

.5-1-79 ) ESC Terminal Records

39

By July'1,1979, the Title I

Migrant 'evaluation staff will

.Ove,sent to the Texas Educa-

6-30-79. TEA Annual Evaluation Report for Title I

Migrant

INFORMATION NEEDS OVERVIEW

.;

INFORMATION lEED

tion Agency the Annual Evalua-

,tion Repott.

By June 30,1979!, the Title I

Migrant Evalliation staff will

have pub4Shed a Final Evalua

!..tion Report and' Technical

Report addresSing' the decision

questions developed by the

AISD. decision makers with

authority over thei1lgrant

Program.

By January-31,1974, the Title'

I Migrant evaluation staff, in

cooperation'with the" Title

regulat,evaluatiOn staff, 'Will

provide' the program staff with

a comprehensive needs assess-

ment fdr the planning of the

1979 -89'igrant Program.

DATE'.

INFORMATION

NEEDED

INFORMATI N.SOURCE

6-30-79

1-31-79;

) Title. I Migrant Final Report and Final

Technical Report.

Needs Assessment Document

78.1 L

DISSEMINATION

INFORMATION. DISSEMINATION DATE: OF

' :DISTRIOTION

1. Evaluation Findings for.1977 -78 d)Fil-m, Technical 7 -1 -78

':Report

b)Finil Report 7-1-78

Summary. _

c)TEA Final 7-1-78

Riport

d)Decisioi PLket 8-15-78

e)Descript±ve.

.13rOchure..:

.

f)Oral p esenta*

,

Summer School Evaluation 1978 aNSummer School.Report

Evaluation Design, 1978-79 a)Outline of datato be collected

tF,.. Interim Findings ;'. a)Needs Assess-..,

meat Document/Progra*Appli-cation

)Informativememos

"7..914778_

11-9-78-

9 -1 -78

,9

.2-1-79,

..-.1hroughOut

the:year.

PERSONS

RECEIVING..

CpoolBoard,.'.DDP

Program Staff,TEA:

Cabinet, Asst.'

Superintendent,Decision7making.CoMmittee'.

Progiam.

Staff ;.' principalsof ..,sohato.-1s,1.7ith.:

Migrant7teachers".

PAC

TEA

DDP, Depts. ofEducatibtalIastruCtio.-Coordinators';;school principals

DDP, Program.Staff.

k .

',INFORMATION SOURCE ..

A.

... POPULATION

... .

EVALUATICN .

QUESTIONS

'REFERENCED

D'ATE

COLLECTEDANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

.

REMARKS.

TEST. DATA.

'Migrant pre-kindergarten

Students.

D2b1, 119.: SepteMber

'through

.

April

.. .

. .

.

,

'Frequency distribution, of number of .,

,

items correct for tach.Mastery Test

completed.

.i

Will be given by teachers at

the close of each groupof,

units.,

,

1., BECP Mastery Testi

.,

.

2. loehM.Test of.

Concepts..

, .

,. . .

rant kindergarten

students.: ':.

D3-1", r14,

.118, 1,19

September

:,ind,

,February'

. ... .

Frequency distribution of raw scores and.

computation of a mean and median. :.ton7,.

version to percentile ranking.

.

District Wide Testing... c '.....

4

.1., California:Achievement

.Tests

4s

. . ,

All migrant students serve

by a Migrant

grades 2712. (Preteet).: All

migrant student grides:.

1 -12 (posttest).. '

. '. .

r

D3H1, I144

118,:119.....

.". '',

October

February.' .

April. .,

jrequenci,distributIon of4Ins'in.trade

equiialenti bYfirade and com,utations of

:a mean and median gain by grade.' 6e0n-,

tation,of.mean'and.medianotiisCOres by,,,

grade and conversion tO:pereenrile '';

"ranking,, Computation digrade:ofSveragt

gala in grade eqn14aientsPer.menth:of ,

inertructioR., -',.........,,,.

...Ai .,

Cdserictlide,Testing:

Grades 1-4 (Pretest' Spring,

.19/13):, Special Teating-Pre.

Grades (all students not

tested. in spring), Post'

Grades4-12. .:.'

". ',.'''., '.

, . . '''4. Metropolitan ReadinisS, .

Test' 2.

I.' .r, e - 2 ''..

yirst-gradnialgrant, '.:

students.. ,

,114 '.

.

.

,

, .

Septembei

6 .

Frequency. distribution' of raw scores and

computation by"grade.Of mean'and:mediani'

,Conversion.to percentile ranking..

.

District "Wide Testing

.'

5.',-Sequential Tests.of

.Educational Progress

:

All migrant.studentiin

grades 9-12.

.....

14. ,April

... .

Frequency-distribution,and computatiod. '

by grade .of mean and median.. raw scores.

;Conversion to.percentile ranking,

District.iidelesting,

1NTERVIENIQUESTIONNAIRE DATA

All Migrant teachers.

1

: ,.

12-4, D3-3,

D4-3, D5 -3,

D6-1, D6-3

119

January.

1979'

. ,.

Frequencysdistributions,

,,'

6. Migrant Teacher Question-

.naire. ,

.. .

D5-3, 14,

9. Higrantlarent,Random sample of migrant D54, D6-1,

Questionnaire . patents. D6=3, 119

.10. PAC Officer Quetitionna re District PAC Officers.. D6.3

11, Intervie,;.with the

AssiAtant %rector of

Special Area Personnel'

ASsistant Director of

Speeilal'Area Personnel. ".

January Content coding.

'All principals of schools 1124; D3-3,

frith Migrant aesthete. ' D44.

13....Migrant Coordinator coordinators., D2'74; D3-3

QuestionnaireD4-3

Frequency distribution. otar by month.

Oases!'

April

15. Health' Services Form All stUdents served by the

iftirint Program Nurse.:.

..ju.br Frequency distribution. Total by month..

through

0'

VI

INFORMATION SOURCES

INFORMATION SOURCE

..

FORILATION....,..

EVALUATION

QUESTIONS

REFERENCED

-

DATE

COLLECTED

.

......

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

,

REMARKS

,....

10. Medical Expemses Form , All students. forwhom

, medical' expenses were paid.

D5-1, 16,

113, II5,

119 .

. July..

through

April

.Frequency distribution. Total by month..

Q

.....

17. Migrant Student

Attendance Form

i .

All migrant students

served by a Migrant

teacher. ..

.

D2 -4, D3-3,

.D4-3, D6-1,

113, 114,

119

.,

August

through

April

. ,

,

Frequency distribution. Total by six- .

'week periods. Comparisons acroSs, school

;by grade. Comparisons by type of ,....

instruction (pull-out vs. teaming. vs.

regularly scheduled. classes). Correia-.

tion and crosstabs of gain id,aibievement

X type, df instruction and ,pekteat anal.

ance (number of days receiving instruc:

tion divided by of days scheduled

to receive instructions., .,

' .

.

.

.

18. Parent Training ,

Evaluation Forms '

ligrant'parents receiving,

parent training from

community .representative.

D6-:1, 119 ' Noveiber

through .

April

.

..

Frequency distribution.

.

.

.LARGE DATA FILES

All students served by

AISD compensatory educe-,

tion programs, .

15, 116 --..

September

'through '

April

Frequency distribution of students

served by each program and combinations

of programs. .

..'ii1,9;'. -tompensatoryirograms.

MasterList .

20., Personnel EvalOation,

, Files ,.,

.

Sampil of Title I, Title I

Migrant, SCE and locally

funded teachers

..

D1-2

.

December :

7

Frequency. distributions, t-test between

fedefal and local funded personnel,'

21. District Personnel

Files

Sample of Title I, Title,1

Migrant, SCE and locally

funded teachers. '

.

,

pi-3 December

.

.

Frequency.distributions,. comparisons

between federaland locally funded .

personnel.

... .

0 / 4

Co

INFORMATION SOURCES

INFORMATION SOURCE

22. Migrant Student Master

File

23. Pre-K Longitudidal File,

' 24.' Migrant Longitudinal File

OTHER DATA S

25. Migrant Student Folders.

26. Survey of Migrant

. ,Programs

27. PAC Data'

28. Classroom Observations

POPULATION.

All ,registered migrant

'itudents.

.Migrant, students, through

fourth grade.

All migrant students.

Random sample'of.folders

kept.by Migrant teachers

JOT secondary students

for the diagnostic/pre-

icriptive approach.

Other school districts

with a Migrant Program

\

N/A.

K-5Agrant teacher's

,Elassrooms.

'EVALUATION &VIE .

QUESTWNS , COLLECTED

REFEEpiCED

15-.4 D673, July

4;15,116 through

119 ;April

D273 March

1979

ANALYSIS. TECRN1QUEi

Frequency'distributions by School and

girade. Ilerging'with District DIE file

to project ,student enrollment by school'

and grade for 1979-80. Merging with

'District Test files: to obtain student

achievement dati.

To he.determined.

-3

D4-41

D6-1, 06-3 \

119

03-3

May Create file for futu analyses.

979

Ndvember

through

April

October.

through

April

October

through.

April

November

through

April

.Inspection.

Inspection.

Inapeceion.

uency distributions. ..Further

yses to be determined.

DATA TO B COLLECTED IN THE SCHOOLS

a, ,

September-April I. Bilingual' Early Childhood Program (BECP) Mastery Tests:.Aeministered to-the participants in the pre-kindergartenprogram at the end of the units that they cover. A pre-test is also given-prior to the first eight,units.

Califorhia-Achlevement Tests : .Makeup tests will'Admiatisterlid in October to migrant students grades,2=-12`whci were not ,tested in the spring, 1478: Thistestingwill-serve as a pretest measure.. District-wide testing in Aprilw:L1.1 also-serve.as the post-testing for students ia grades 13, Students ingradOs 4-12 will bgivewa special a4miaistration-ofthe CAT (ih addition :to district-wide-testing) in /

. April 1,979.; Grades 4 and 5. are giventhe full readingseCtion;1-grades-6=12 are given the vocabulary _testonly. Testing will be done by the Migrant teacherwith, assistance provided by ORE. staff.

a

September-April 1. ..Migrant Teacher Questionnaire: To be sent to allMigrant teachers in January.

Teacher_ Questionnaire To be sent to a sample ofteachers in schools with a Migrant teacher inJanuary.

Migrant Student Attendance. Form : To'be completed-daily by the. Migrant teacher and returned to theMigrant evaluator at the end of each six weeks.

4, Migrant Student Folders: Teacher testing foracademic placement and usage of the diagnostic/prescriptive approach Will be monitored throughthe Migrant teachers' retordsoon individual stu-dents.

-5. Classroom Observations: Approximately 40 full-dayobservations in classes, grades I-5,-taught byMigrant teachers. Observations will be,by OREstaff during the months of January through April.

C. Principals .

September-April: 1.- PrinciRal-Questionnaire:- TO be sent to all princi-pals oV'schools with Migrant teachers during themonth-of January.

Aernirry

. ,

EVALUATION TIME RESOURCES ALLOCATION

SENIOR,.

DIRECTOR 'EVALUATOR EVALUATOR'No.N.IMNomummenerommmmillintwoeorm.prommim.

INFORMATION SOURCE`

f3ECP -'\

,

SECRETARY

10

4. ET

STEP

Migrant Teacher Questionnaire .25

Teicher. Questionnaire

Health Services Form

Medical'Exi)enie Forth

-It

'AtTIVITY

VIII

EVALUATION TIME RESOURCES ALLOCATION

SENIOR

DIRECTOR, 'EVALUATOR EVALUATOR

11. Student Attendance Fora

12. Student Foldeis:

DATA

ANALYST

8

iVALUATION'.

ASSISTANT

10

SECRETARY

4

13. Migrant, Nurse Interview

14. Parent Questionnaire

MD.

.25

15.. PAC Officer Questionnaire.

16. ,PAC Data'.

17. Classroom Observations

18. Compensatory Programs

19. Survey of.Migiant Programs

.25

a

ACTIVITY

I

VIII

EVALUATION TIME RESOURCES ALLOCATION

DIRECTOR

SENIOR

EVALUATOR EVALUATOR

21,. Pre-14 Longitudinal' File .25.

DATA EVALUATION

ANALYST ASSISTANT SECRETARY

22, Migrant Longitudinal File .25

SUBTOTAL OF INFORMATION SOURCES 4.5 74 58 '38

IDISSEMthilONS

1. Final *port 50

TEA Report

:,Oral Presentations

EvaluaironDesign1U-

Addendum to TEA Report 10 10

Needs Assessment

Program Application

EVALUATION TIME 13ESOURCS... ALLOCATION

ACTIVITY

1.111111111=1111111101ImmimelIMSIMIMMI1111MiliMiliMMIIIIINEMINIr

8, Informative Memos

SENIOR DATA EVALUATION

DIRECTOR EVALUATOR EVALUATOR $ ANALYST ASSISTANT

S20 dm

SECRETARY'r

30

,'SUBTOTAL OF DISSEMINATIONSro

4.5

ADMINISTRATIVE

I. Other Indirect Time Costs

. 121 118

35 35

191