srdesign

Upload: meluk-rhaina-de-silva

Post on 09-Apr-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    1/29

    Aerospace Engineering Sciences

    Capstone

    Senior Design ProjectsASEN 4018/4028

    How they prepare students for the workforce

    Jean N. KosterUniversity of Colorado

    December 15, 2008

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    2/29

    REAL WORLD STATUS 2008

    20% Of the Workforce Is Eligible To RetireToday

    One-third Of the Workforce Eligible ToRetire In 5 Years

    One-half Of the Workforce Eligible ToRetire In 10 Years

    Greg Enders, LMCO 2

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    3/29

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    4/29

    AES Senior Projects StructureCourse

    Coordinator

    2 PAB Advisors

    2 PAB

    Advisors

    2 PAB Advisors

    2 PAB Advisors

    ElectronicsTrudy Schwartz

    MachinistMatt Rhode

    2 PAB Advisors

    2 PAB

    Advisors

    2 PAB Advisors

    2 PAB Advisors

    TEAM 1

    Customer1

    7-10Students

    TEAM 2

    Customer2

    7-10Students

    TEAM 3

    Customer3

    7-10Students

    TEAM 4

    Customer4

    7-10Students

    TEAM 5

    Customer5

    7-10Students

    TEAM 6

    Customer6

    7-10Students

    TEAM 7

    Customer7

    7-10Students

    TEAM 8

    Customer8

    7-10Students

    Project Advisor Board (PAB) Total 9 faculty (1 course credit) and 2 staff 1 Course Coordinator (Jean Koster, 2008)8 Faculty Team Advisors; advising 2 different teams eachEach advisor team is differentStaff advisors: Matt Rhode and Trudy Schwartz

    Maximum 8 Teams

    4

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    5/29

    Senior Projects Team Structure

    ProjectManager

    Subsystem 1Lead Engineer

    CFO SafetyEngineer

    Customer 2 PAB Advisors

    ManufacturingEngineer

    SystemsEngineer

    Subsystem 2Lead Engineer Subsystem 3Lead Engineer Subsystem 4Lead Engineer

    Common Subsystems:Mechanical Electrical Software Aerodynamics Structures Thermal

    5

    Teams operate like small entrepreneurial businesses

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    6/29

    Course Milestones

    Progress Evaluation Process:1. Starting Point: Customer Project Proposal (Requirements)2. Project Definition Document (PDD)3. Conceptual Design Document (CDD)4. Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

    5. Critical Design Review (CDR)6. Fall Final Report7. Spring Manufacturing Interim Reviews (IR1, IR2)8. AIAA Student Regional Conference Paper

    9. Final Project Review (FPR)10. Spring Final Report (SFR)11. ITLL Public Expo

    6

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    7/29

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    8/29

    Deliverables 1 (PDD)

    Customer Requirements Project Definition (PDD) Background, Goal, Objectives, Functional Block Diagram,Concept of Operations

    Top level Project Requirements (0.PRJ.x)

    Top level System Requirements (0.SYS.x) Minimum Requirements for Success Deliverables Technical and Financial Risks Team formation and Team Expertise Resources

    8

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    9/29

    Deliverables 2 (CDD)

    Project Definition Conceptual Design (CDD) Team information System Architecture (3 design options)

    Requirements (3-5 most important reqs., rank) Feasibility (for top ranked architecture option) Testing and Verification requirements for key systems Assess key risks and mitigation options

    Assess team qualifications Respond to criticism received on PDD Resources update

    9

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    10/29

    ASEN 401810

    Choosing System Architecture

    Wheeled Spider

    UAV

    Snake Roller

    Tracked

    System concept baseline study selected wheeled architecture

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    11/29

    Deliverables 3 (PDR)

    Conceptual Design Preliminary Design (PDR) Development and assessment of system design options;arguments for chosen architecture

    Flow-down from functional needs to identified requirements

    System Design-To specifications. Development andassessment of subsystem design options and design-tospecifications

    Preliminary itemization of required performance parameters

    Project Feasibility Analysis and Risk Analysis Define high risk sub-system for prototyping Back-of-the-envelope, Matlab, preliminary analysis or test Define optional off -ramps

    Project Management Plan (preliminary) Myers-Briggs analysis 11

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    12/29

    Oral Presentations PDR, CDR

    Presentation to 11 PAB members and entire body of students Presentations: 50 minutes: 25 min presentation and 25 min Q&A Every student must present at least once at PDR and CDR

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    13/29

    System Breakdown StructureProject: MARVLIS - 2007

    6 Dimension, 10 min Endurance, Image Capture/Transmission with location,Launch Capability

    Propulsion

    Legend

    Sub-Subsystems

    Subsystems

    SystemRequirements

    Aerodynamics Electronics LauncherStructures

    Propeller

    Motor/Gearbox

    BatteriesTail/Stabilizers

    ControlSurfaces

    Camera

    Receiver

    GPS

    SpeedController

    Servos

    Spring

    TelescopingLeg

    Airframe

    Planform

    Aerodynamics

    Airfoil

    Materials

    LaunchElectronics

    MAV Interface

    December 16, 2008 MARVLIS 13

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    14/29

    Design-To Specifications

    Preliminary Design Review 14

    Mother Rover Design-To Specifications1. Baseline weight of 100 lbf.

    2. Baseline dimensions of 3.5 ft. wide x 3.5 ft. long x 2.0 ft. high3. Base of Mother = 4.25 in. from ground level

    4. Mounted camera must see Children at all times

    (representative model only)

    Ramp Design-To Specifications1.Length of ramp is greater than length of

    Child rover2.Ramp is 3x wider than Child rover

    3.Ramp is placed on front or back of Motherrover only

    4.Ramp will have -in. ground clearance

    Child Rover Design-To Specifications1. Baseline weight of 15 lbf.

    2. Baseline dimensions of 10 in. wide x 10 in. long x 8 in. high

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    15/29

    Aerodynamics Risk

    Justifications: Wings too small

    Cannot take off in 75 ft, use batteriestoo fast

    Mitigation: Prototyping Improperly sized tail

    Plane is unstable & uncontrollable Mitigation: Margin & prototyping

    Improperly sized control surfaces Aircraft is uncontrollable Mitigation: Extra analysis & margin

    Insufficient directional stability

    Aircraft stability is unknown and notconsidered

    Mitigation: Adding a vertical fin &deflecting single rudder in turn, use dragto turn

    15

    Improperlysized tail

    Insufficientdirectional

    stability

    Wings toosmall

    Improperlysized control

    surfaces

    Possibility

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    16/29

    Deliverable 4 (CDR)

    System Architecture is fully documented at CDR All subsystems are checked for feasibility and are given a go Sub-system decomposition and integration is understood

    Mechanical, electrical, and software elements are analyzed All blue-prints are ready to enter the fabrication process

    Interfaces between sub-systems are working well Integration of sub-systems into units is understood

    Manufacturing and System Integration Plan The Testing and Verification Plan is finalized

    Test concepts of operation are documented Project Management Plan (PMP) is finalized The System Engineer signed off on the proposed design Manufacturing of components starts after successful completion of

    CDR.

    B. S. Blanchard, W.J. Fabrycky, Systems Engineering and Analysis, Prentice Hall,2006.16

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    17/29

    System Design

    Critical Design Review

    1. Primary Vehicle (PV) On-board PIC controls the DeploymentMechanism (DM) through Command andData Handling (CDH) Pilot controls the control surfaces

    2. Deployment Mechanism (DM)

    Consists of mounting point for the SV andlinear actuator for pin-movement Attached to the PV with bracketing system

    3. Sub-Vehicle (SV) CUPIC autopilot controls the controlsurfaces and motor settings through CDH Payload is supplied with its own power

    SystemArchitecture

    17

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    18/29

    Design

    Critical Design Review

    Deployment Mechanism Design Actuator pulls a pin

    Pin removes attachment to SV

    DM weighs 9g

    DM mounted to an aluminum beam

    DeploymentMechanismMDE

    The SVs shall be deployed on demand. The DM shall weigh no more than 13 g The DM shall be mounted on a rod (the bracket) capable of

    withstanding the expected loads.

    Deployment Mechanism Design-To Specs

    Prototype & Testing Results Under vibrations from 0 Hz to 150 Hz, successful

    deployment 121/124 trials

    Confidence of 95 % in vibrations During simulated aerodynamic loading, successfuldeployment 20/20 trials

    Confidence of 99 % in aerodynamic loading

    18

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    19/29

    ASEN 4018 19

    Matlab Model

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    20/29

    ASEN 4018 20

    Need thicker boom due to deflection at max load.

    Based on experimental data: OD = .312 for 1.5 deflection (+1.3oz)

    0 5 10 15 20 25

    -10

    -9

    -8

    -7

    -6

    -5

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0 Tail Boom Test Load versus Displacement

    Load (lbs)

    D i s p

    l a c e m e n

    t ( i n

    )

    Experimental

    Theoretical

    3.65" At EstimatedMax Load

    Failure at23lbs8.75"

    Experimental Verification & Prototyping

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    21/29

    Educational Support

    Lectures: Project Selection Conceptual design Defining Requirements Systems Engineering Mission Failures Project Management

    Running Meetings Patent Law, IP Ethical Decision-Making Entrepreneurship

    Workshops: System Engineers Program Managers Team working Fabrication (9) Measurements Electronics

    Power Systems Composite Fabrication Safety Fire

    21

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    22/29

    http://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjects

    Example of ITLL Poster Presentation

    22

    http://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjectshttp://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjects
  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    23/29

    Senior Design Student Paper AwardsAIAA Reg. V Student Paper Conferences

    2008 First Place, Team Division (KRAKEN senior project team) Second Place, Team Division (MARVLIS senior project team) Second Place, Graduate Division (Laurren Kanner)

    2007 First Place , Graduate Division (Laurren Kanner) First Place , Team Division (SOARS senior project team) Best Student Paper , JANNAF Conference, Team MaCH-SR1

    2002 First Place , Undergraduate Division (Otto Krauss MaCH-SR1)

    23

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    24/29

    CU-AES Senior Design Webpage:http://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjects

    AES Senior Design Network http://aesseniordesign.ning.com/

    http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=159152

    Contact:[email protected]

    +(303)492-694524

    http://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjectsmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjects
  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    25/29

    History of Recent Projects - 1

    BIRDIE Biologically-Inspired lowReynolds number DynamicImagery Experiment

    To create an experimental apparatus that cantrace out a given wing motion similar to ahummingbird in hovering flight

    DIABLO De-rotated Imager of theAurora Borealis in Low-Earth Orbit

    Provide a spinning satellite with a de-rotatedimaging system

    D-SUAVE Deployable Small UAVExplorer To design, fabricate, integrate and verify a RCcontrolled UAV capable of being remotelydeployed from the ARES aircraft and flying aspecific flight pattern

    PRV Peregrine Return Vehicle To provide the Colorado Space GrantConsortium with a reusable vehicle that canreturn student built science payloads to aselected target

    SOARS Self Organizing AerialReconnaissance System

    Design, build and test an autonomous aerialsystem (UAS) capable of imaging multipletargets within a 1 km circle as quickly aspossible with 99% probability of object detection(according to Johnson criteria)

    SWIFT Supersonic Wind andImaging Flow Tunnel

    Supersonic wind tunnel (Mach number 1.5 2.5)and flow visualization system operable by

    undergraduate students

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    26/29

    History of Recent Projects - 2

    VITL Vehicle for Icy TerrainLocomotion

    Design and build a prototype for locomotionsystem of a vehicle exploring a Europa-like surfacecapable of traversing 1 km of icy terrain in 7 dayswith characteristic obstacles

    BREW Bolt-on RacecarEnhancing Wing

    Conceive, design, fabricate, integrate, test, andverify a device that allows the measurement of thedownforce and drag of any rear wing for present

    and future CU FSAE carsCALAMAR-E Cavity Actuated Low-speed ActivelyManeuverable AquaticRover Experiment

    Conceptualize, design, fabricate, test, and verifysynthetic jet actuators for a highly maneuverable,low speed under water vehicle

    Flap and AileronReplacement System

    Produce a wing that demonstrates roll controlwithout mechanical linkages by integration of

    smart materials as actuatorsMaCH-SR1 Multi-disciplinary Conceive, design, fabricate, integrate, and verify aself-sufficient hybrid rocket engine

    MARS Meteorological AerialResearch Sonde

    Conceive, design, fabricate, and test a deployabledual-mode sonde system that will provide multi-unit communications ability capable of sustainedflight times and controlled flight

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    27/29

    History of Recent Projects -3

    HARRV High Altitude ResearchReturn Vehicle

    Design, build, test a return vehicle for scientificpayloads released from high altitude balloonsto proximity of balloon launch site

    SPEC Space Elevator Climber Design a model space elevator system to competein the Spaceward Foundation Elevator 2010competition.

    Short TakeOff Wing Design, fabricate , and characterize a FanWing

    deviceHAVUC Heavy-lift Aerial Vehicle for the Conceive, design, fabricate, integrate, test, andverify an un-inhabitated aerial vehicle (UAV) with aheavy-lift capability that has an empty weight nogreater than 10 lb; heavy-lift being defined as thepayload contributing a minimum of 60% to the totaltakeoff weight

    SHARC Stable Handling Aerial Radio-controlled Cargo-testbed

    Develop a low-cost, easy to operate, and reliableaerial vehicle for testing of sensor payloads

    CUBDF Design-Build-Fly Design, build, fly a high-volume payloadcompetitive aircraft after AIAA competitionguidelines.

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    28/29

    History of Recent Projects -4

    APTERAAero-Braking Project ToEffectively Reduce Altitude Design, build, and test a deployable devicewhich will increase aerodynamic drag with the

    intent of changing the orbit of the DANDEsatellite from 600km to 350km within 300 days.

    Mach-SR1 Multi-disciplinary Hybrid StudentRocket Project

    design, build, test, integrate feed, injection andignition subsystems into a flight configuration for ahybrid rocket to deliver a 0.5 kg payload to analtitude of 4,500 m.

    KRAKEN Kinematically RovingAutonomously controlled Electro-Nautic

    Design, build, competitively test an unmannedunderwater vehicle equipped with vortex ringthrusters

    MARVLIS Micro Air Reconnaissance VehicleLaunch and Imaging System

    Design, fabricate, and test a micro air vehiclecapable of capturing an image and transmitting itwith a time and position stamp

    ADAMSS Aerially Deployed AutonomouslyMonitored Surface Sensors

    Design and build a system that can remotely placelow-cost disposable sensors, collect science data,and then retrieve this data all without on-site humaninteraction

    ARCTIC Arctic Region Climate Trackingand Instrumentation Cargo

    The goal is to develop a payload that provides arcticclimate data measurements at otherwiseinaccessible earth-fixed locations. The payload willbe constructed for an InSitu Insight A-20 UAV.

  • 8/7/2019 SrDesign

    29/29