srdesign
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
1/29
Aerospace Engineering Sciences
Capstone
Senior Design ProjectsASEN 4018/4028
How they prepare students for the workforce
Jean N. KosterUniversity of Colorado
December 15, 2008
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
2/29
REAL WORLD STATUS 2008
20% Of the Workforce Is Eligible To RetireToday
One-third Of the Workforce Eligible ToRetire In 5 Years
One-half Of the Workforce Eligible ToRetire In 10 Years
Greg Enders, LMCO 2
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
3/29
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
4/29
AES Senior Projects StructureCourse
Coordinator
2 PAB Advisors
2 PAB
Advisors
2 PAB Advisors
2 PAB Advisors
ElectronicsTrudy Schwartz
MachinistMatt Rhode
2 PAB Advisors
2 PAB
Advisors
2 PAB Advisors
2 PAB Advisors
TEAM 1
Customer1
7-10Students
TEAM 2
Customer2
7-10Students
TEAM 3
Customer3
7-10Students
TEAM 4
Customer4
7-10Students
TEAM 5
Customer5
7-10Students
TEAM 6
Customer6
7-10Students
TEAM 7
Customer7
7-10Students
TEAM 8
Customer8
7-10Students
Project Advisor Board (PAB) Total 9 faculty (1 course credit) and 2 staff 1 Course Coordinator (Jean Koster, 2008)8 Faculty Team Advisors; advising 2 different teams eachEach advisor team is differentStaff advisors: Matt Rhode and Trudy Schwartz
Maximum 8 Teams
4
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
5/29
Senior Projects Team Structure
ProjectManager
Subsystem 1Lead Engineer
CFO SafetyEngineer
Customer 2 PAB Advisors
ManufacturingEngineer
SystemsEngineer
Subsystem 2Lead Engineer Subsystem 3Lead Engineer Subsystem 4Lead Engineer
Common Subsystems:Mechanical Electrical Software Aerodynamics Structures Thermal
5
Teams operate like small entrepreneurial businesses
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
6/29
Course Milestones
Progress Evaluation Process:1. Starting Point: Customer Project Proposal (Requirements)2. Project Definition Document (PDD)3. Conceptual Design Document (CDD)4. Preliminary Design Review (PDR)
5. Critical Design Review (CDR)6. Fall Final Report7. Spring Manufacturing Interim Reviews (IR1, IR2)8. AIAA Student Regional Conference Paper
9. Final Project Review (FPR)10. Spring Final Report (SFR)11. ITLL Public Expo
6
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
7/29
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
8/29
Deliverables 1 (PDD)
Customer Requirements Project Definition (PDD) Background, Goal, Objectives, Functional Block Diagram,Concept of Operations
Top level Project Requirements (0.PRJ.x)
Top level System Requirements (0.SYS.x) Minimum Requirements for Success Deliverables Technical and Financial Risks Team formation and Team Expertise Resources
8
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
9/29
Deliverables 2 (CDD)
Project Definition Conceptual Design (CDD) Team information System Architecture (3 design options)
Requirements (3-5 most important reqs., rank) Feasibility (for top ranked architecture option) Testing and Verification requirements for key systems Assess key risks and mitigation options
Assess team qualifications Respond to criticism received on PDD Resources update
9
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
10/29
ASEN 401810
Choosing System Architecture
Wheeled Spider
UAV
Snake Roller
Tracked
System concept baseline study selected wheeled architecture
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
11/29
Deliverables 3 (PDR)
Conceptual Design Preliminary Design (PDR) Development and assessment of system design options;arguments for chosen architecture
Flow-down from functional needs to identified requirements
System Design-To specifications. Development andassessment of subsystem design options and design-tospecifications
Preliminary itemization of required performance parameters
Project Feasibility Analysis and Risk Analysis Define high risk sub-system for prototyping Back-of-the-envelope, Matlab, preliminary analysis or test Define optional off -ramps
Project Management Plan (preliminary) Myers-Briggs analysis 11
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
12/29
Oral Presentations PDR, CDR
Presentation to 11 PAB members and entire body of students Presentations: 50 minutes: 25 min presentation and 25 min Q&A Every student must present at least once at PDR and CDR
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
13/29
System Breakdown StructureProject: MARVLIS - 2007
6 Dimension, 10 min Endurance, Image Capture/Transmission with location,Launch Capability
Propulsion
Legend
Sub-Subsystems
Subsystems
SystemRequirements
Aerodynamics Electronics LauncherStructures
Propeller
Motor/Gearbox
BatteriesTail/Stabilizers
ControlSurfaces
Camera
Receiver
GPS
SpeedController
Servos
Spring
TelescopingLeg
Airframe
Planform
Aerodynamics
Airfoil
Materials
LaunchElectronics
MAV Interface
December 16, 2008 MARVLIS 13
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
14/29
Design-To Specifications
Preliminary Design Review 14
Mother Rover Design-To Specifications1. Baseline weight of 100 lbf.
2. Baseline dimensions of 3.5 ft. wide x 3.5 ft. long x 2.0 ft. high3. Base of Mother = 4.25 in. from ground level
4. Mounted camera must see Children at all times
(representative model only)
Ramp Design-To Specifications1.Length of ramp is greater than length of
Child rover2.Ramp is 3x wider than Child rover
3.Ramp is placed on front or back of Motherrover only
4.Ramp will have -in. ground clearance
Child Rover Design-To Specifications1. Baseline weight of 15 lbf.
2. Baseline dimensions of 10 in. wide x 10 in. long x 8 in. high
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
15/29
Aerodynamics Risk
Justifications: Wings too small
Cannot take off in 75 ft, use batteriestoo fast
Mitigation: Prototyping Improperly sized tail
Plane is unstable & uncontrollable Mitigation: Margin & prototyping
Improperly sized control surfaces Aircraft is uncontrollable Mitigation: Extra analysis & margin
Insufficient directional stability
Aircraft stability is unknown and notconsidered
Mitigation: Adding a vertical fin &deflecting single rudder in turn, use dragto turn
15
Improperlysized tail
Insufficientdirectional
stability
Wings toosmall
Improperlysized control
surfaces
Possibility
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
16/29
Deliverable 4 (CDR)
System Architecture is fully documented at CDR All subsystems are checked for feasibility and are given a go Sub-system decomposition and integration is understood
Mechanical, electrical, and software elements are analyzed All blue-prints are ready to enter the fabrication process
Interfaces between sub-systems are working well Integration of sub-systems into units is understood
Manufacturing and System Integration Plan The Testing and Verification Plan is finalized
Test concepts of operation are documented Project Management Plan (PMP) is finalized The System Engineer signed off on the proposed design Manufacturing of components starts after successful completion of
CDR.
B. S. Blanchard, W.J. Fabrycky, Systems Engineering and Analysis, Prentice Hall,2006.16
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
17/29
System Design
Critical Design Review
1. Primary Vehicle (PV) On-board PIC controls the DeploymentMechanism (DM) through Command andData Handling (CDH) Pilot controls the control surfaces
2. Deployment Mechanism (DM)
Consists of mounting point for the SV andlinear actuator for pin-movement Attached to the PV with bracketing system
3. Sub-Vehicle (SV) CUPIC autopilot controls the controlsurfaces and motor settings through CDH Payload is supplied with its own power
SystemArchitecture
17
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
18/29
Design
Critical Design Review
Deployment Mechanism Design Actuator pulls a pin
Pin removes attachment to SV
DM weighs 9g
DM mounted to an aluminum beam
DeploymentMechanismMDE
The SVs shall be deployed on demand. The DM shall weigh no more than 13 g The DM shall be mounted on a rod (the bracket) capable of
withstanding the expected loads.
Deployment Mechanism Design-To Specs
Prototype & Testing Results Under vibrations from 0 Hz to 150 Hz, successful
deployment 121/124 trials
Confidence of 95 % in vibrations During simulated aerodynamic loading, successfuldeployment 20/20 trials
Confidence of 99 % in aerodynamic loading
18
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
19/29
ASEN 4018 19
Matlab Model
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
20/29
ASEN 4018 20
Need thicker boom due to deflection at max load.
Based on experimental data: OD = .312 for 1.5 deflection (+1.3oz)
0 5 10 15 20 25
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0 Tail Boom Test Load versus Displacement
Load (lbs)
D i s p
l a c e m e n
t ( i n
)
Experimental
Theoretical
3.65" At EstimatedMax Load
Failure at23lbs8.75"
Experimental Verification & Prototyping
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
21/29
Educational Support
Lectures: Project Selection Conceptual design Defining Requirements Systems Engineering Mission Failures Project Management
Running Meetings Patent Law, IP Ethical Decision-Making Entrepreneurship
Workshops: System Engineers Program Managers Team working Fabrication (9) Measurements Electronics
Power Systems Composite Fabrication Safety Fire
21
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
22/29
http://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjects
Example of ITLL Poster Presentation
22
http://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjectshttp://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjects -
8/7/2019 SrDesign
23/29
Senior Design Student Paper AwardsAIAA Reg. V Student Paper Conferences
2008 First Place, Team Division (KRAKEN senior project team) Second Place, Team Division (MARVLIS senior project team) Second Place, Graduate Division (Laurren Kanner)
2007 First Place , Graduate Division (Laurren Kanner) First Place , Team Division (SOARS senior project team) Best Student Paper , JANNAF Conference, Team MaCH-SR1
2002 First Place , Undergraduate Division (Otto Krauss MaCH-SR1)
23
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
24/29
CU-AES Senior Design Webpage:http://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjects
AES Senior Design Network http://aesseniordesign.ning.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=159152
Contact:[email protected]
+(303)492-694524
http://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjectsmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/SrProjects -
8/7/2019 SrDesign
25/29
History of Recent Projects - 1
BIRDIE Biologically-Inspired lowReynolds number DynamicImagery Experiment
To create an experimental apparatus that cantrace out a given wing motion similar to ahummingbird in hovering flight
DIABLO De-rotated Imager of theAurora Borealis in Low-Earth Orbit
Provide a spinning satellite with a de-rotatedimaging system
D-SUAVE Deployable Small UAVExplorer To design, fabricate, integrate and verify a RCcontrolled UAV capable of being remotelydeployed from the ARES aircraft and flying aspecific flight pattern
PRV Peregrine Return Vehicle To provide the Colorado Space GrantConsortium with a reusable vehicle that canreturn student built science payloads to aselected target
SOARS Self Organizing AerialReconnaissance System
Design, build and test an autonomous aerialsystem (UAS) capable of imaging multipletargets within a 1 km circle as quickly aspossible with 99% probability of object detection(according to Johnson criteria)
SWIFT Supersonic Wind andImaging Flow Tunnel
Supersonic wind tunnel (Mach number 1.5 2.5)and flow visualization system operable by
undergraduate students
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
26/29
History of Recent Projects - 2
VITL Vehicle for Icy TerrainLocomotion
Design and build a prototype for locomotionsystem of a vehicle exploring a Europa-like surfacecapable of traversing 1 km of icy terrain in 7 dayswith characteristic obstacles
BREW Bolt-on RacecarEnhancing Wing
Conceive, design, fabricate, integrate, test, andverify a device that allows the measurement of thedownforce and drag of any rear wing for present
and future CU FSAE carsCALAMAR-E Cavity Actuated Low-speed ActivelyManeuverable AquaticRover Experiment
Conceptualize, design, fabricate, test, and verifysynthetic jet actuators for a highly maneuverable,low speed under water vehicle
Flap and AileronReplacement System
Produce a wing that demonstrates roll controlwithout mechanical linkages by integration of
smart materials as actuatorsMaCH-SR1 Multi-disciplinary Conceive, design, fabricate, integrate, and verify aself-sufficient hybrid rocket engine
MARS Meteorological AerialResearch Sonde
Conceive, design, fabricate, and test a deployabledual-mode sonde system that will provide multi-unit communications ability capable of sustainedflight times and controlled flight
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
27/29
History of Recent Projects -3
HARRV High Altitude ResearchReturn Vehicle
Design, build, test a return vehicle for scientificpayloads released from high altitude balloonsto proximity of balloon launch site
SPEC Space Elevator Climber Design a model space elevator system to competein the Spaceward Foundation Elevator 2010competition.
Short TakeOff Wing Design, fabricate , and characterize a FanWing
deviceHAVUC Heavy-lift Aerial Vehicle for the Conceive, design, fabricate, integrate, test, andverify an un-inhabitated aerial vehicle (UAV) with aheavy-lift capability that has an empty weight nogreater than 10 lb; heavy-lift being defined as thepayload contributing a minimum of 60% to the totaltakeoff weight
SHARC Stable Handling Aerial Radio-controlled Cargo-testbed
Develop a low-cost, easy to operate, and reliableaerial vehicle for testing of sensor payloads
CUBDF Design-Build-Fly Design, build, fly a high-volume payloadcompetitive aircraft after AIAA competitionguidelines.
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
28/29
History of Recent Projects -4
APTERAAero-Braking Project ToEffectively Reduce Altitude Design, build, and test a deployable devicewhich will increase aerodynamic drag with the
intent of changing the orbit of the DANDEsatellite from 600km to 350km within 300 days.
Mach-SR1 Multi-disciplinary Hybrid StudentRocket Project
design, build, test, integrate feed, injection andignition subsystems into a flight configuration for ahybrid rocket to deliver a 0.5 kg payload to analtitude of 4,500 m.
KRAKEN Kinematically RovingAutonomously controlled Electro-Nautic
Design, build, competitively test an unmannedunderwater vehicle equipped with vortex ringthrusters
MARVLIS Micro Air Reconnaissance VehicleLaunch and Imaging System
Design, fabricate, and test a micro air vehiclecapable of capturing an image and transmitting itwith a time and position stamp
ADAMSS Aerially Deployed AutonomouslyMonitored Surface Sensors
Design and build a system that can remotely placelow-cost disposable sensors, collect science data,and then retrieve this data all without on-site humaninteraction
ARCTIC Arctic Region Climate Trackingand Instrumentation Cargo
The goal is to develop a payload that provides arcticclimate data measurements at otherwiseinaccessible earth-fixed locations. The payload willbe constructed for an InSitu Insight A-20 UAV.
-
8/7/2019 SrDesign
29/29