stability analyses and face support design for cross ... · pdf filestability analyses and...
TRANSCRIPT
Stability Analyses and Face Support Design for Cross Passage of
Waterview Project, Auckland (NZ)
M. Wansbone, R. Bhargava
Parsons Brinckerhoff, Australia
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
Content Cross Passage: Size, Function, Geometry Cross Passage XP17 Geotechnical Conditions Constraints: Surface and Subsurface Construction Method & Sequence
Stability Analyses Analytical Method/Calculations 3D Numerical Analyses
Results Summary
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
Cross Passage Overview
Cross Passages 16 mined (total 18) ~ 150m spaced Internal Space: Electrical & Comm. Room (2m x ~) Emergency Egress (1.2 x 2.1m) Mech. Pump and Deluge(1.5m x ~) Cables & Conduit Trench
XP17
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
XP17: Size & Geometry
• Size Internal: 5.2m x 5.6m
Excavation:6.4m x 6.8m
• Support / Lining Temporary: SFRS 100-300mm
Permanent: RC 300mm
Tanked Structure
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
XP17 Geology South Portal
North Portal
XP17
XP17: Geology Cross Section
ER & EW critical to: - Face Stability - Face Deformations
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
Constraints & Impacts
• XP17 beneath GTNR Road, HP Gas & Sewer
Ground Treatment: Road Closure & Utility Damages
Intentional Dewatering: Settlement & Damages
• Proposed Solution
Reinforcing ground from within the tunnel
Pipe Canopy for Roof, and GRP Dowels for Face
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
Sequence & Method Sequence - Top Heading w/Footing
- Bench
Main Considerations - Enhance Face Stability
- Address Settlement Impacts on:
- GTNR, HP Gas and Sewer mains
Analyses Required - Validate Stability of Sequence
- Face Bolt Requirement
- Temp Support Design
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
Stability Analyses First Principle Calculations - Wedge silo limit equilibrium
- Drained condition (EW sandy, 1 round/12hrs)
- Full face unstable, TH (stable but FOS<1.4)
- Top heading with face bolts (FOS>1.4)
Limitations - Excavation sequence unaccounted
- Stress & deformation unknown (extent of yield)
- Stratigraphy & tunnel influence (indirectly)
3D FE Analyses to address the limitations
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
3D Analyses FLAC-3D model - Tunnel and XP opening support (props) & sequence included
- Cross passage sequence included
- GRP face bolts included
Face Bolts
Props
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
3D Analyses Analyses Type - Both Undrained & drained ground behaviour modelled
- Drained case adopted for design
Stability in 3D Analyses - Strength Reduction Factor
- Shear Failure Mechanism (soil and highly weathered rock)
- Failure Condition defined by increase in face displacements for
applied strength reduction factor analyses run
- Factor of safety = inverse of strength reduction factor (ratio of
available to mobilized strength)
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
Results
Outputs
- For each cross passage advance SRF runs carried out
- Ground contours plots obtained
- Face displacement at selected points on the face vs SRF of
heading and bench plotted
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
Implementation of Design Permit to Tunnel Process
- 3 mandatory probe holes
- Ground Class Assessment
- Install Canopy Tube
- Install Face Bolt
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
Summary • Stability of proposed sequence of excavation validated
• Face reinforcement pattern validated
• Installing face bolts much cheaper and less disruptive
than ground treatment
• Ground deformations, particularly longitudinal settlement
profile
• Impacts on overlying services and pipe assessed
separately using ground settlement profile from 3D
analyses
• It is useful to include factor of safety check as a part of
numerical analyses for temporary support design
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
Acknowledgments • Well Connected Alliance
• Matt Wansbone (Co Author)
Thanks!
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
Thank You
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
Project Overview
• Location - Auckland (NZ)
• Project Cost - NZ$1.4b
• Project Objective - Complete western ring route
• Project Model - Alliance (NZTA client)
• Delivery by - Well-Connected Alliance
• Tunnel Construction - Commenced 2013
• Commissioning - April, 2017
Tunnel (key elements)
• TBM - 10th largest EPBM machine
• Diameter - 14m (largest tunnel in Australia-Pacific)
• Reinforcement - World’s largest SFRC lining
Well-Connected Alliance – Waterview Connection
3D Analyses