stack emission test results from existing and new …
TRANSCRIPT
STACK EMISSION TEST RESULTS FROM EXISTING AND NEW HIGH TEMPERATURE FLUID BED MUNICIPAL SLUDGE INCINERATORS OPERATING IN US AND ONTARIO (CA)
K. Dangtran, Ph.D., DFBC Consulting, LLC L. Takmaz, Ph.D., SUEZ
NJWEA 103rd ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION
BALLY’S ATLANTIC CITY
ATLANTIC CITY, NJ
May 8th, 2018
High Temperature Fluid Bed Municipal Sludge Incinerators
(Thermylis®, SSI, HTFB, Thermal Oxidizer)
MACT Background Information & MACT Limits
MACT Compliance Equipment
Stack Emission Test Results
Conclusions
TOPICS OF DISCUSSION
High Temperature Municipal Sludge Incinerators
NEW INCINERATOR TO MEET US EPA MACT
High Pressure Water Pump
Fluidizing
Air Blower
Preheat Burner
Combustion Air
Venturi
Scrubber
Primary Secondary
Heat Exchangers
Stack
Tray
Scrubber Wet
ESP
Service Water
Compressed Air
Sand
Storage
Exhaust
Gas Duct
Feed Pump
Sludge Dewatering
Sludge
Sand
Purge Air Blower
Gas
Feed
Purge
Blower
CEMS
Ash Treatment
Settling Lagoon
Caustic
Service Water
Carbon Bed Adsorber
Demister
Urea (or Ammonia) Injection
Hg
Dioxin
Furan
Cd
Pb
PM
NOx
SO2
HCl
PM
PROCESS BLOCK DIAGRAM
FLUID BED REACTOR
Preheat Burner
Sand Port
Sand Bed
Tuyere
Windbox
Fluidized Bed
Hot Air Inlet
(1200F)
Sand
Removal Nozzle
Sludge
Feed Nozzle
Freeboard
Tear Drop
Reactor Design
Self Supporting
Refractory Roof Freeboard
Auxiliary Fuel
Injectors
FLUID BED REACTOR
TYPICAL HEAT INPUT / OUTPUT
MUNICIPAL SLUDGE
27-28%TS
AUX FUEL
PREHEAT AIR
EXHAUST GAS & HEAT LOSS
AUXILIARY FUEL REQUIREMENT
Basis: Excess Air 40%, Feed Rate 454 kgDS/hr (1,000 lbs /hr), 75% VS,
5,556 kcal/kg (10,000 btu/lb) VS, 1550 F Freeboard, Auxiliary Fuel HHV
10,500 kcal/kg (18,900 btu/lb)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
18% 20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 32% 34% 36% 38% 40%
Sludge DS%
Auxil
iary F
uel L
b/hr
1200 F 1000 F 800 F 600 F 120 F
PRIMARY HEAT RECOVERY
Primary Heat Exchanger
(Tube & Shell)
• Preheat Combustion Air
• Eliminate Auxiliary Fuel Usage
SECONDARY HEAT RECOVERY
Secondary Heat Exchanger (Tube & Shell), Waste Heat Boiler, Thermal Oil Economizer, Hot Water Economizer
• Plume Suppression
• Process Steam Generation
• Seasonal Building Heating
• Thermal Fluid Heating
• Electricity Production (Turbine Generator )
WET ASH SYSTEM (WET APCS)
High Pressure Water Pump
Fluidizing
Air Blower
Preheat Burner
Combustion Air
Venturi
Scrubber
Primary Secondary
Heat Exchangers
Stack
Tray
Scrubber Wet
ESP
Service Water
Compressed Air
Sand
Storage
Exhaust
Gas Duct
Feed Pump
Sludge Dewatering
Sludge
Sand
Purge Air Blower
Gas
Feed
Purge Blower
Circulating
Pump
CEMS
Ash Treatment
Settling Lagoon
Caustic
Service Water
Carbon Bed Adsorber
Demister
Urea (or Ammonia) Injection
DRY ASH SYSTEM (DRY APCS)
Inlet Sludge
Sand Silo
Incinerator
Flue Gas
Natural Gas
Air for
Fluidization
Heat
Exchanger Economizer
Expansion
Tank
Hot
Water
Circuit
Building Usage
Fin Fan
Cooler
Stack
Bag Filter
Ash
Silo
ID Fan
k
Sodium Bicarbonate
and Activated Carbon
SEMI-DRY ASH SYSTEM (SEMI-DRY APCS)
Inlet Sludge
Sand
Silo THERMYLIS
Incinerator
Flue Gas
Natural Gas
Air for
Fluidization
Heat
Exchanger Economizer
Expansion Tank
Hot Water
Circuit
Building
Heat Exchanger
Fin Fan Cooler
Scrubber
Drain
Caustic Soda
Circuit
Water
Stack
Bag Filter
Ash
Silo
ID Fan
FLUID BED INCINERATION ADVANGATES
Continuous Autothermic Process
Flexible Process for Variations in Total Solids
Turbulence Without Moving Parts
Nearly Isothermal Conditions
Quick Response to Variations in Feed Rate
Minimum Heat Loss During Shutdowns
High Combustion Efficiency at Low Excess Air
Power Generation
HOT WINDBOX
REACTOR
PRIMARY
HEAT EXCHANGER
DUFFIN CREEK, ON
2 Trains – 115 DTP each with Steam Generation
MILL CREEK, OH
3 Trains – 96 DTP each
GREEN BAY, WI
1 Train – 51 dry TPD
LITTLE BLUE VALLEY, MO
1 Train – 60 dry DTP
SLUDGE PORT AND AUXILIARY FUEL GUNS
Sludge Lines Fuel Injectors
SNCR FOR NOx REMOVAL
Urea, when combined with NOX of the flue gas at high temperatures,
transforms the noxious substances into N2, CO2 and H2O
SNCR = Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction
VENTURI SCRUBBER FOR PM, HCl and SO2
Caustic
Injection
REACTOR REHAB
MACT Background Information
MACT Limits
MACT (Maximum Achievable Control Technology)
Issued by US EPA on March 21st, 2011
Applies to new and existing municipal sludge fluid bed incineration
plants in US
Compliance by March 21st, 2016 for all plants in operation
Plants not in compliance with MACT should be retrofitted to meet the
new emission limits
Retrofit Equipment: Wet ESP, Mercury Removal System, Scrubber
Caustic Addition, NOx Removal System
MACT BACKGROUND INFORMATION
US EPA MACT LIMITS
EPA Guideline for NEW and EXISTING FB Incinerators
Pollutant Units Existing FB
(@ 7% O2)
New FB
(@ 7% O2) Cd mg/dscm 0.0016 0.0011
CO ppmvd 64 27
HCl ppmvd 0.51 0.24
Hg mg/dscm 0.037 0.0010
NOx ppmvd 150 30
Pb mg/dscm 0.0074 0.00062
PCDD/PCDF,TEQ ng/dscm 0.1 0.0044
PCDD/PCDF,TMB ng/dscm 1.2 0.013
PM mg/dscm 18 9.6
SO2 ppmvd 15 5.3
EMISSIONS CONTROL FOR NEW FACILITY
Pollutant based equipment selection
Pollutant Equipment
CO High Efficiency Combustion
NOx Ammonia/Urea Injection at Freeboard (SNCR)
SO2
Caustic injection at Wet Scrubber
HCl
PM
Cd Venturi Scrubber + Wet ESP
Pb
Hg
Fixed Carbon Bed Adsorber PCDD/PCDF,TEQ
PCDD/PCDF,TMB
MACT Compliance Equipment
TYPICAL PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM (RETROFIT EQUIPMENT)
SPC: Sorbent Polymer Composite
To Ash Treatment
Sludge
Fluidizing Air Blower
Primary Heat
Exchanger
Compressed Air
Sand Storage
Silo
Exhaust Gas Duct
Centrifuge
Decanter
High Pressure
Water Pump
Sand
Purge Air Blower
Fuel Oil
Natural Gas
Feed Pump
Fuel Oil Pump
Fuel Oil Pump
Urea or Ammonia
Quench Scrubber
Stack
Plant Water
Continuous Emissions
Monitoring System
Tray Cooler
Venturi Section
Fixed Carbon Bed Adsorber
or SPC Modules
Wet ESP
Caustic
Injection
TYPICAL PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM (RETROFIT EQUIPMENT)
Quench Scrubber
Stack
Plant Water
Continuous Emissions
Monitoring System
Tray Cooler
To Ash Treatment
Fluidizing Air Blower
Primary Heat
Exchanger
Compressed Air
Sand Storage
Silo
Exhaust Gas Duct
Centrifuge
Decanter
Sludge
High Pressure
Water Pump
Sand
Purge Air Blower
Fuel Oil
Natural Gas
Feed Pump
Venturi Section
Deaerator
Softener
Waste Heat Boiler & Economizer
Steam Turbine
Fuel Oil Pump
Fuel Oil Pump
ID Fan
Fixed Carbon
Bed Adsorber
or SPC Modules
Steam Recovery & Condensate
System
Secondary Heat Exchanger
Electricity Generator
Wet ESP
Caustic
Injection
Urea or Ammonia
SPC: Sorbent Polymer Composite
Stack Emission Test Results
RETROFIT PLANT INFORMATION (SPC MODULES)
From
Waste Heat
Recovery
To Stack
Scrubber SPC Modules
Flue Gas Flow
MERCURY REMOVAL
Stand alone installation
Guaranteed to achieve up to 70% removal of Hg*
Proprietary expanded PTFE material
MERCURY REMOVAL
THERMYLIS PLANT EMISSIONS (EXISTING INCINERATORS)
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
Cd
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.4
CDD/CDF, TMB
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
CDD/CDF, TEQ
010203040506070
CO
THERMYLIS PLANT EMISSIONS (EXISTING INCINERATORS)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
PM
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
SO2
THERMYLIS PLANT EMISSIONS (EXISTING INCINERATORS)
00.10.20.30.40.50.6
HCl
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
Hg
0
50
100
150
200
NOx
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
Pb
Average mercury removal efficiency for Incinerator 4, 5, 6 and 7 = 87%
NEW PLANT INFORMATION (FIXED CARBON BED)
From
Waste Heat
Recovery To Stack
Scrubber
Conditioner
Adsorber
Start Up Heater Skid Flue Gas Flow
INCINERATOR NO. 1
Incinerator No. 1 is equipped with fixed carbon bed installed after scrubber (Canadian Installation)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Em
issio
n
0.15
ppm
0.5
microgram/m3
2
pg/m3
0.6
mg/m3
INCINERATOR NO. 2
Incinerator No. 2 is equipped with fixed carbon bed installed after scrubber (Canadian Installation)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Em
issio
n
0.517
ppm
0.35
mg/m3
0.91
microgram/m3
3.7
pg/m3
INCINERATOR NO. 3
Incinerator No. 3 is equipped with fixed carbon bed installed after wet ESP (US Installation)
020406080
100120140160
Em
issio
n
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
2
Em
issio
n
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Em
issio
n
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.0070.0080.009
0.01
Em
issio
n
A B
C D
INCINERATOR NO. 4 & 5
Incinerators No. 4 & 5 are equipped with fixed carbon bed installed after scrubber (Canadian Installation)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Em
issio
n
Incinerator No. 4
0102030405060708090
Em
issio
n
Incinerator No. 5
0.499
ppm
0.587
ppm
INCINERATOR NO. 6
Incinerators No. 6 is equipped with fixed carbon bed installed after scrubber (Canadian Installation)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Min. Oxygen (%) Total Hydrocarbons(ppm) 10 min Avg.
Total Hydrocarbons(ppm) 30 min Avg.
TSP (mg/m3) HCl (ppm) Mercury(microgram/m3)
Dioxin-Furan (TEQ)(pg/m3)
Em
issio
n
0.791
ppm
INCINERATOR NO. 7
Incinerators No. 7 is equipped with fixed carbon bed installed after scrubber (Canadian Installation)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
TSP (mg/DRm3) Hg (microgram/DRm3) HCl (mg/DRm3) Dioxin-Furan (TEQ) (pg/DRm3)
Em
issio
n
0.289
ppm
INCINERATOR NO. 8
Incinerator No. 8 is equipped with fixed carbon bed installed after wet ESP (US Installation)
0102030405060708090
100
Em
issio
n
0
2
4
6
8
10
Em
issio
n
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Em
issio
n
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
Em
issio
n
A B
C D
MERCURY EMISSIONS (SPC)
0.0000
0.0100
0.0200
0.0300
0.0400
0.0500
0.0600
0.0700
0.0800
Hg
Em
issio
n (
mg
/dscm
)
Existing Incinerators (US Installation) -vs- MACT
0.0000
0.0100
0.0200
0.0300
0.0400
0.0500
0.0600
0.0700
0.0800
Hg
Em
issio
n (
mg
/drc
m)
Existing Incinerators (US Installation) -vs- Ontario (CA)
MACT Limit For Existing Incinerator
Ontario Limit For New Incinerator
MERCURY EMISSIONS (FIXED CARBON BED)
0.00000
0.00050
0.00100
0.00150
0.00200
0.00250
0.00300
0.00350
0.00400
Incinerator 1 Incinerator 2 Incinerator 3 Incinerator 4 Incinerator 5 Incinerator 6 Incinerator 7 Incinerator 8
Hg
Em
issio
n (
mg
/dscm
)
New Incinerators (US Installation) -vs- MACT
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
Incinerator 1 Incinerator 2 Incinerator 3 Incinerator 4 Incinerator 5 Incinerator 6 Incinerator 7 Incinerator 8
Hg
Em
issio
n (
mg
/dscm
)
New Incinerators (Canadian Installation) -vs- Ontario (CA)
Designed and Built
Before MACT
Designed and Built
After MACT
0.037 mg/dscm (MACT Limit for Existing Installation)
0.001 mg/dscm
(MACT Limit for New Installation)
Ontario Limit For New Incinerator
FIXED CARBON BED MERCURY REMOVAL EFFICIENCY
60
70
80
90
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Hg
Rem
ov
al
Eff
icie
ncy (
%)
Test Points
Low Inlet Mercury Level in Sludge
High Inlet Mercury Level in Sludge
Conclusions
CONCLUSIONS
o 9 existing and 8 new incinerators have been considered for this
study. Incinerators are located in US and Ontario (CA).
o Retrofitted plants are meeting the MACT emission limits in US.
o For new incineration systems in US, we recommend fixed carbon
bed adsorber to be able to meet 1 micron/dscm mercury emission
requirement in stack. Extremely high efficiency (>95%).
o For existing incineration systems in US, we recommend SPC
modules to be able to meet 37 micron/dscm mercury emission
requirement. Low removal efficiency (>70%).
o Fixed carbon bed adsorber is difficult to operate compared to SPC
modules. However, it has significantly higher removal efficiency.
o For new incineration systems in Ontario (CA) (70 microgram/drm3),
we recommend SPC modules for mercury removal.
Thank you