STAGE 0 PROJECT: ACCESSIBILITY FOR AUDIO, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENTPresentation: IEC TC100 Advisory Group on Strategy (AGS), Tel Aviv100/Paccessibility and usability (001) 015

Jean Baronas and Kate GrantOctober 18, 2009

Stage 0 Project Team Update The Project Team held 3 teleconferences

since the Sao Paulo meetings: 10 February 2009 1 April 2009 31 August 2009

The ballot on the draft Technical Report closed October 10, 2009 Comment resolution October 19, 2009 in Tel Aviv

Great Project Team spirit throughout the year

Proposed checklist (extracted) 4.a. Has the intent and meaning of

terminology been considered? 4.b. Has interchangeable terminology

and the use of graphics, drawings, and / or images been considered?

5.a. Has the extent to which the equipment and services will be used been considered?

5.b. Has the scope of disability been defined?

Proposed checklist

5.c. Has Universal Design been considered?

5.d. Has “good usability” been considered?

7.a. Have the completed standards and ongoing projects been considered?

8.a. Has the perception of visual information been considered?

8.b. Has the perception of auditory information been considered?

Proposed cheklist

8.c. Has the perception of the existence and location of actionable components been considered?

8.d. Has the perception of the status of controls and indicators been considered?

Proposed checklist

8.e. Has the perception of feedback from an operation been considered?

8.f. Has the ability to invoke and carry out all actions including maintenance and setup been considered?

8.g. Has the ability to complete actions and tasks within the time allowed been considered?

Proposed checklist

8.h. Has the concept of protection from accidental activation been considered?

8.i. Has the ability to recover from errors been considered?

8.j. Have security and privacy based on listening and automatic protection of information been considered?

8.k. Has the protection from personal risk been considered?

Proposed checklist

8.l. Has the efficient operation of a product been considered?

8.m. Has the product use been considered?

8.n. Has the output / displayed material been considered?

8.o. Has the ability to use assistive technology been considered?

Proposed checklist

8.p. Consideration of cross cutting issues? new accessible technologies adjustments for built-in accessibility

features access to customer service and training ways to provide feedback about

improvements to accessibility accessibility functions available at all times,

without disruption

Summary

Project Team (PT) teleconferences yielded results Still can benefit from increased Technical Area

Manager (TAM) participation for “top down” standards analysis

Still can benefit from liaisons Good sponsor for the teleconference logistics

is important Thank you to our sponsor!

On-line collaboration tools help: www.iec.ch Timeline / goals met