static-content.springer.com10.1007... · web viewit is well-known that the sensitivity of the mip...
TRANSCRIPT
A New Core@Shell Silica-Coated Magnetic Molecular
Imprinted Nanoparticles for Selective Detection of Sunset
Yellow in Food Samples
Majid Arvand*. Zahra Erfanifar . Masoomeh Sayyar Ardaki
Electroanalytical Chemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Science, University of Guilan, Namjoo
Street, P.O. Box: 1914–41335, Rasht, Iran
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +98131 33233262, fax: +98 131 33233262
E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Arvand)
The Effect of Gr and MIP Quantity
In our investigations, we intended to study the amount of Gr powder and MIP nanoparticles
on the sensor efficiency. Results showed that the peak current of SY increased with increasing
the concentration of Gr suspension up to 10 mg/mL; then it decreased gradually. This might be
attributed to the low mechanical stability of the composite film when it contained proportionally
more Gr compared to the Nafion. Therefore, 10 mg/mL Gr suspension was used for casting onto
the GCE surface.
It is well-known that the sensitivity of the MIP sensor is controlled by the amount of effective
imprinted sites on its surface. The amount of the imprinted sites increases with the increase in the
thickness of MIP layer. The thickness of MIP layer can easily be controlled by adjustment of
concentration of MIP nanoparticles suspension. The CV response to SY obviously rose and
reached a maximum when the MIP nanoparticles amount was less than 6.0 mg/mL and then
decreases with a further increase in its concentration. This result indicated that by increasing of
the MIP nanoparticles content in the sensing film up to 6 mg/mL, the amount of imprinted
sites increased. When the amount of MIP nanoparticles was too much (higher than 6
mg/mL), the thick film of MIP nanoparticles hindered the mass transport and the electron
transfer. In fact, thick MIP nanoparticles layer would lead to low binding capacity, poor site
accessibility and slow binding kinetics.
Effect of Incubation Time and Potential
In order to explore the influence of incubation time to the response of the sensor and find the
optimal incubation time, the electrode was incubated in a stirring 0.1 mol/L ABS (pH 4.4)
containing 100 μmol/L SY for different incubation time (from 5 to 50 min). The plot of anodic
peak current as a function of incubation time indicated that the current response of SY
significantly increased with an increase of incubation time from 5 to 30 min. This remarkable
signal enhancement indicated that incubation was feasible to improve the detection sensitivity.
Longer incubation time than 30 min did not enhanced the oxidation peak current of SY,
indicating the saturated rebinding of SY took place onto the MIP sensor surface. Thus, the
optimum incubation time should be 30 min for the electrochemical determination of SY.
The effect of incubation potential on the peak intensity was also investigated over the range of
-0.1 – 0.5 V. With the change of incubation potential, the peak current varied slightly. Therefore,
the incubation potential had no such effect on the peak intensity and the incubation was carried
out at open-circuit conditions.
Fig. S1 (A) Cyclic voltammograms of (a) bare GCE, (b) Fe3O4@SiO2-NPs@NIP/Gr/GCE, (c)
Fe3O4-NPs/Gr/GCE, (d) Fe3O4@SiO2-NPs/Gr/GCE and (e)
Fe3O4@SiO2-NPs@MIP/Gr/GCE in 5 mmol/L K3[Fe(CN)6] containing 0.1 mol/L KCl
(scan rate: 0.1 V/s). (B) Nyquist plots of EIS in the solution containing 5 mmol/L
[Fe(CN)6]3−/4− solution as probe and 0.1 mol/L KCl as supporting electrolyte
Fig. S2 (A) Cyclic voltammograms of SY (100 µmol/L) in 0.1 MPBS (pH 8) at different scan
rates (V/s) with Fe3O4@SiO2-NPs@MIP/Gr/GCE. (B) Linear relationship of anodic and
cathodic peak currents (Ip) vs. scan rate (ν). (C) Relationship between the logarithmic
peak current and the logarithmic scan rate for the anodic peak
Fig. S3 (A) Variations of redox peak current (Ip) with respect to pH of the electrolyte. (B) Linear
relationship of the anodic peak potential (Epa) vs. pH
Fig. S4 DPVs obtained for orange flavored jelly powder sample in PBS (0.1 mol/L, pH 8.0) before
(dashed line) and after spiking with different SY concentrations