station hill, bury st edmunds masterplan consultation

1 Station Hill, Exhibition Report engageplanningC O M M U N I T Y C O N S U L T A N T S

Station Hill, Bury St Edmunds

Masterplan Consultation Report

August 2013

APPENDIX B

2

Station Hill, Exhibition Report

1.0 Introduction: Hopkins Homes is working closely with St Edmundsbury Borough Council to develop a vision for the regeneration and redevelopment of the Station Hill site, which will provide a vibrant and sustainable new 'Station Quarter' for Bury St Edmunds.

The finalisation of a masterplan for the site will enable planning applications to be submitted to the Council, so that the long-awaited regeneration of the area can begin. The site is allocated in the Adopted St. Edmundsbury Council Local Plan (Policy BSE6) as one that should come forward for redevelopment.

Consultation

The public exhibition presented two elements, the overall masterplan and detailed Phase 1 proposals. The latter is subject to change as the design evolves. In hindsight the matters should have been dealt with separately, so to avoid confusion, this report focuses solely on the comments in relation to the masterplan. The main issues raised in respect of Phase 1 have been briefly summarised and included in Appendix 1 of this document and will be used to inform the design review and preparation of subsequent planning applications. The Phase 1 images and explanatory text have now been removed from the development brief, as has reference to the height of the landmark building. Additional changes to the brief include detail added in respect of the recently listed (Grade II) railway signal box to the Heritage section and a date has been amended in reference to the ecology survey. 1.1 Location:

The event was held at the Quaker Meeting Place, St John’s Road, Bury St Edmunds between 3pm and 7.30pm, with an earlier session from 2pm to 3pm for local representatives and stakeholders. 1.2 Publicity:

Invitation letters were sent to 2,493 households and businesses in Bury St Edmunds. Invitations were also sent to members of St Edmundsbury Borough Council, Bury-St-Edmunds Town Council, The Bury Society, Suffolk County Council and further statutory consultees. Both residents and stakeholders were able to phone Engage Planning Ltd with any questions they had. An advertisement was also placed in the editorial section of the Bury Free Press. 1.3 Attendance:

The event was attended by approximately 100 people.

3


1.4 Feedback Form and Leaflet:

All those who attended the exhibition were given a feedback form which invited comments on both the masterplan and the proposals for Phase 1. A copy of the exhibition boards was available to take away. 1.5 Project Website:

A dedicated project website www.stationhill.co.uk enabled residents to view the proposals and comment online. The full masterplan brief is also available to download on this site. This has enabled residents who were unable to attend the exhibition to view the proposals. It has also enabled residents to review the information they had seen at the exhibition, before submitting their comments. The website will be updated throughout the planning application process. 2.0 Feedback

All those who attended were given a feedback form to record their comments. Feedback was also encouraged through the website www.stationhill.co.uk. To date, fifty-four people have returned these forms to Engage Planning or commented via the website. On the feedback form attendees were asked to comment on the masterplan, and overleaf on the Phase 1 Application. Please see below for the main issues raised together with Hopkins Homes’ response. 2.1 Feedback on the Masterplan

2.1 Question 1:

Attendees were asked: Do you generally support the proposals for the regeneration of the Station

Hill site?

The results were as follows: Response

Number of Responses

Yes 23 To an extent 26 No 4 No response 1

4


2.2 Question 2: Are there any changes to the masterplan that you would like to see?

House types. Attendees said they would like to see houses with gardens in further phases, not

just flats.

The masterplan indicates the provision of low density houses with gardens to the west of the site.

Station drop off. Attendees were keen to ensure an appropriate drop-off point at the station

and adequate parking for rail users.

The masterplan does not alter access arrangements at the station and the number of car parking spaces provided would remain unchanged. The existing private car park located to the south of the station which would be lost is underused and there is considered to be adequate parking provision within existing nearby public car parks to accommodate any demand as well as a wide range of bus services connecting to the rail station. In addition, there is scope for further parking to the north of the station building

Height of the ‘landmark’ building. Some respondents said they wished the scheme to be lower – suggesting four storeys

A landmark building at the crest of the hill was considered by the local authority as a preferred option in order to provide a strong focal point in the streetscene and a positive visual link between the station and the town. The scale and detailing of the landmark building is a matter for consideration in the later detailed Phase 1 proposals. One of the changes to the masterplan has been the removal of reference to a specific storey height for the landmark building.

Density. Some said they felt the site would be over-developed.

The masterplan envisages a higher density development to the site frontage in order to reflect the existing built environment but with lower density houses with gardens to the west. The detailed density is a matter for consideration in the subsequent Phase 1 proposals.

Pie Chart

43%

48%

7%2%

Yes To an extent No No response

5


Community facilities. A couple of residents said they would like to see a small shop or

community facility included in the masterplan The site is already well located in relation to existing shops and community facilities which are within easy walking and cycling distance of the site. However, the development brief does not preclude such uses coming forward in the future.

Significant views. One respondent said he wished to see sketches of ‘significant’ views through the masterplan

Subsequent phase proposals will provide detailed visuals.

Lighting. One attendee said he hoped the scheme would be subject to a carefully thought

through lighting strategy Lighting will be carefully considered in detail in the later phase proposals to avoid adverse impact on existing buildings.

One said he would have liked officers from SEBC to have been present at the exhibition to talk

through the wider masterplan

Officers have been active participants in the development of the masterplan.

Care Home: One resident suggested a care home form part of the wider masterplan to cater

for older residents in Bury

The development brief does not prevent such use coming forward on the site in the future.

Burlingham Mill – one resident said she would like to see the building used to support growing

companies such as Work House

As above, the masterplan does not preclude such use being proposed at a future stage.

Affordable Housing – some residents said they would like to see affordable housing in order to

create a mixed community inform the development of the wider area which is not specific on

many detailed matters, such as the provision of affordable housing

The development brief is not specific on detailed matters such as affordable housing. The document makes reference to viability issues on the site which will be dealt with in detail subsequently following the outcome of viability assessments. The final decision on viability matters including the provision of affordable housing is one for the Council to determine.

2.3 Question 3: Attendees were asked: Do you have any comments on the following areas?

a) Road, pedestrian and cycle accessibility

Link to the A14. A couple of respondents said they wished to see a direct link to the A14. One

person suggested a one-way system around the entire site. The surrounding highways strategy is outside of the remit of the development brief however, it is considered that future development will have a negligible impact on the A14 and would not generate sufficient travel demand to justify the need for a new strategic road junction.

6


Cycle and pedestrian routes. A number of residents said they wished to see safer routes for

people to walk and cycle in to the town centre, Tesco and to the new cycle bridge. Crossing the

road at the Tayfen Road roundabout was specifically mentioned as being dangerous for

pedestrians. The masterplan recognises the opportunity to create pedestrian and cycle linkages through the site to existing Public Rights of Way to enhance access to recreational facilities and provide safer routes to schools. Cycle and pedestrian routes will be given a high priority in the subsequent detailed design stages.

Underground parking. A couple of respondents also said they wished to see underground

parking utilised in order to allow for more green areas An additional basement car park was not found to be financially viable. Parking areas will be visually screened from view by buildings and extensive landscaping.

Parking. A number of residents said they wished to see the number of parking spaces

increased. The site is located in a highly accessible area, within easy walking distance from local shops, schools and community facilities. The rail station is immediately adjacent to the site with a wide range of bus travel options. There is also a range of employment opportunities within easy reach of the site on foot or by bike. Census data shows that car ownership in this town centre location is low and as such a reduced car parking provision is considered acceptable.

Northgate roundabout. Another said she wished to see improvements to Northgate

roundabout It is not anticipated that the masterplan development would have a noticeable impact on the operation of the Northgate Roundabout.

Access to Station Hill. One said he didn’t want to see access to Station Hill restricted

The development brief does not propose any access restrictions on Station Hill which, overall will be much improved. The masterplan seeks to transform Station Hill from an unsightly back route into a pleasant link between the station and the town, with visitors able to wander through a landscaped walkway. The landmark building will provide a focal point for this walkway with areas of hard and soft landscaping forming a small plaza between it and Station Hill itself to provide a haven for pedestrians.

Emergency Access. One person said she was keen to ensure traffic flowed in order to ensure

emergency vehicular access

The existing vehicular access to the Mill off Station Hill would be closed to all but emergency vehicles. This would ensure that if the main access to the site becomes blocked for any reason another means of access can be obtained. The detailed scheme would ensure that appropriate widths, turning heads, vision splays and access for all vehicles, including emergency vehicles is provided. The wider highway and the traffic flow in general in the area around the site is out of the scope of the masterplan.

7


Footway improvements. One respondent said he wished to see the path alongside the car

dealership improved and link to Tayfen meadow

Walking and cycling improvements would be provided along Station Hill and the masterplan envisages a link to Tayfen Meadow via a green walkway alongside the present car dealership.

Concern the development would attract younger single people who would use the pubs and

clubs in the town centre which would lead to noise problems The masterplan foresees the provision of homes for families and professionals and as such it is considered that this will not be a matter of concern. However, as with anywhere, any anti-social behaviour can be dealt with by statutory measures outside of the planning system.

New bus routes The provision of new bus routes will be the responsibility of local operators to respond to any

increase in demand.

(b) Landscaping

One resident said they would like to see more green areas in the masterplan linking to the Fen

Way nature reserve

The masterplan incorporates a network of green corridors, which in conjunction with the enhancement of the adjoining Park to the south (Tayfen Road development) and public spaces, will provide links through the site connecting Station Hill to the Fen Way nature reserve as part of the wider ‘Green Infrastructure’ for the town. The masterplan details the variety of different green spaces which will vary in their character to create a transition from the urban areas of the site to the Fen Way nature reserve. All of the green corridors and spaces will be publicly accessible via a network of pedestrian and cycle routes.

One respondent was concerned about the tree that would be removed near the station

Various options have been considered but if the retention of the tree proves unfeasible (after consultation with professional arboricultural consultants) it will be removed. Many more trees are to be planted as part of the scheme and overall the amount of green space provided will far outweigh that currently existing. Detailed arboricultural and landscaping proposals are a matter for consideration in the later detailed Phase 1 proposals.

Another said he hoped significant efforts would be made to improve biodiversity in the area

The masterplan places a strong emphasis on enhancing biodiversity. Ecological surveys for the site have been completed and further assessments will be undertaken prior to any development taking place with any recommended protection or mitigation measures incorporated.

Planting to screen the railway line to the north was requested

The masterplan shows tree and buffer planting along the railway line to the north of the site and this will be a necessary part of the development.

A couple of residents said they hoped waste bins would be provided within the areas of green

space to prevent littering. Some were concerned that the bike stores would become ‘dumping grounds’

8


All of the open spaces will be comprehensively designed as part of each phase of the development. This will include detailed aspects such as paths, planting and street furniture, including litter bins. A residents association would be established to ensure that communal private areas including bike stores are maintained and that litter is removed regularly and the proposed cycle parking would be contained within a lockable secure compound for residents use only.

The landscaping scheme as part of the new development at Tayfen Road was cited as a good

example to follow

It is envisaged that the landscaping to the proposed development will be of an even higher standard, particularly as it will include wooded areas, green pathways, a refurbishment of the Stationmaster's garden and a particular emphasis on biodiversity and sustainability. The concepts already prepared will be further developed and the detailed design will use high quality materials and planting in order to create a new sense of place and identity for this area of Bury St. Edmunds.

One resident said they hoped to see more green space on arrival at the station

The Station Square is not within the remit of the masterplan however, it is envisaged that this space will be enhanced as part of the wider public realm improvements associated with the masterplan.

Other residents said they wished to see more landscaping in order to help counter air

pollution Full and specific landscaping details will be provided as part of the different detailed phases which will be designed to assist in countering air pollution.

One resident suggested getting local groups to help with the landscaping.

This would be a matter for subsequent local organisation.

(c) Relationship to existing buildings

Residents said they did not want to see a repetition of the ‘Redrow’ flats opposite. One said he hoped the new buildings would reflect the best of the area, not the worst

The masterplan envisages high quality, higher density frontages onto Station Hill responding to the location near the station and connection to the nearby town centre with a landmark building at the crest at the hill to provide an improved link between the railway station and the town itself. The detailing of the buildings is a matter for consideration in the later detailed Phase 1 proposals.

There was some concern over the scale of development in relation to the station building

The scale and design of the buildings is a matter for consideration in the later detailed Phase 1 proposals.

One respondent asked if the disused station buildings could be refurbished as residential units

9


Unfortunately, the buildings are not of sufficient quality for conversion from a practical and financial viewpoint. The Mill Building, however, is of such high quality that its retention and conversion is considered a priority and the masterplan has been largely designed around it. English Heritage has submitted comments which are attached as part of Appendix 2. In

response to these comments Hopkins Homes has said:

“It is pleasing to note the acknowledgement that the redevelopment of the site has the potential to enhance this part of the town and, in particular, the setting of the Grade II railway station and that English Heritage welcomes the opportunity to create a high quality Station Square. In respect of the concerns relating to scale, form and massing, these issues will be carefully considered in the Phase 1 scheme and in subsequent phases. The landmark building will ensure that a strong focal point in the streetscene and a positive visual link between the station and the town is provided whilst not obscuring the existing tower to the station. Phase 1 proposals will also ensure that the streetscape is not dominated by parked cars and that the scale of buildings does not dwarf the listed station and other domestic scale buildings in the vicinity. The relationship between buildings and open spaces in the western portion of the site will be carefully considered at later phases.”

2.4 Question 4: Residents were asked if they had any further comments:

Affordable housing. A couple of residents said they felt the site would suit those living in

affordable accommodation, as it is near local facilities and public transport and does not

require a car

Viability matters including affordable housing will be considered at later detailed stages of the proposals.

School places. One resident said she hoped there was capacity within local schools to

accommodate future demand

Contributions towards school places may form part of the Section 106 agreement that will accompany subsequent planning applications.

One resident said she would like to see a new welcome/information board for people arriving

at the railway station

Although the station entrance is outside of the masterplan area, it is anticipated that the railway authorities will enhance the experience of arrivals at the station to complement the development.

Another that there should be a water fountain near the Yew Tree

This area is outside of the masterplan area however, it is hoped that it will be enhanced as part of the wider public realm improvements associated with the masterplan.

One respondent was concerned that Kids Play will need to relocate The building forms part of the collection of disjointed buildings which detract from the quality of the urban fabric of the historic town and so its relocation will be necessary in order to deliver

10


the site improvements. It is a private commercial facility and there is similar provision within the locality.

One resident sought assurance that archaeological investigations had been carried out

Such investigations will be undertaken if required by the local authority.

11


3.0 Conclusion and Next Steps

Those attending the exhibition are overwhelmingly supportive of the redevelopment of the site. The key issues raised in relation to the masterplan were a need to ensure traffic is managed appropriately, and that the opportunity is taken to improve access to the town centre by making safer routes for pedestrians and cyclists. Parking, both for residents and rail users is considered an important issue. A high-quality landscaping scheme would be welcomed, as would links to existing green spaces. The project team will consider all the comments received and will seek to address these through the further refinement of the masterplan, which is due for adoption by the council in September 2013. Following the adoption of the masterplan, Hopkins Homes will submit a detailed application for Phase 1. Following the submission of the application, there will be a further period of statutory consultation on Phase 1. Hopkins Homes would like to thank all local residents and stakeholders who have contributed to the consultation process and will continue to work with local stakeholders, residents and the local council to ensure the delivery of this important scheme.

12


engageplanningC O M M U N I T Y C O N S U L T A N T S

Engage Planning LimitedUniversity of Warwick Science Park Warwick Innovation Centre Warwick Technology Park Warwick CV34 6UW

Tel: 01926 623095 www.engageplanning.co.uk

APPENDIX 1

Appendix 1 – Summary of Phase 1 comments Scale and Density The density of Phase 1 is too high and the massing is too bulky The blocks are totally out of scale with the station building and surroundings The site will not benefit from proposed new buildings of between 4 and 6 storeys in height No more than 3 storeys should be provided 6 storey flats are overwhelming and risk overshadowing the development Would like to see homes and gardens not flats Appearance The buildings are not in keeping with the Victorian listed station and surrounding area Red brick should be used Victorian terraces/town houses should be proposed The station and mills design should be mimicked Buildings should be traditionally fronted The character of buildings of needs to reflect existing architecture - don't want any more faceless

tower blocks There are several examples in the town where architectural reference to the local vernacular has

been used without being pastiche Buildings need more sympathetic treatment The proposed designs are bland The flats are rather ugly and featureless No features of aesthetic interest are proposed There should be a more modern and radical design of the flats The opportunity exists to create a modern architectural masterpiece that promotes the town and

increases the usage of the station whilst bringing a lost area of the town to life The site would benefit from innovative, modern design, making this a desirable development for

families Hopkins has quite a good reputation for design, so go ahead with this one Streamlined buildings with lots of glass and specialist wood coverings should be proposed Support the look of the new buildings from the mock-up plan Landscaping More green space is needed to soften the effect of so many apartments in such a small space There should be a green buffer zone all along Station Hill road Other comments The area desperately needs redevelopment Sufficient parking, including for rail users should be provided There is currently difficulty for pedestrians crossing the Tayfen Road roundabout There should be less cycle storage and more underground car parking The buildings should be designed to Code Level 6 Security for night time pedestrian access should be ensured Bins should be provided Facilities should be provided for the whole community Construction should not have an adverse impact on traffic in the area and lead to congestion There should be more 1 bedroom homes and affordable units

COMMENTS FROM ENGLISH HERITAGE

Redevelopment of this site has the potential to enhance this part of the town and, in particular, the setting of the Grade II railway station as the point of arrival in the town. Therefore, the proposal to create a high quality Station Square is to be welcomed, but I have some concerns over the scale, form and massing of the buildings suggested for Phase 1 of the development (especially the 6 storey element). While the masetrplanning suggests this will form a landmark at the crest of Station Hill, my concern is that it will obscure the existing tower to the station, which should be regarded as the pre-eminent landmark in this part of the town. The relationship of many of the proposed buildings to the road is also a concern, in that in many instances the streetscape will be dominated by parked cars. Buildings such as the Ipswich Arms suggest a different precedent, with two storey buildings placed tight to the back of the pavement, and curving round to define the corner. I am aware that the modern buildings on the east side of Station Hill are three storey, while Burlingham Mill is four storeys, but the current proposals are in danger of dwarfing the listed station and some of the other domestic scale buildings in the vicinity, and a more sophisticated modelling for the scale and massing of the new buildings could deliver a more successful transition in scale. The masterplan also suggests a landmark building on the southernmost corner of the site. Again it maybe appropriate to provide an architecturally distinctive building on this corner to help in navigation around the town, but that should not be interpreted as a requirement for a further over-tall structure that would be out of keeping with the scale of the historic core of the town. The western portion of the site (phase 4) appears un-resolved, with the houses having little relationship to each other and therefore generating rather ambiguous spaces between the buildings.

EXHIBITION BOARDS

Thank you for attending this public exhibition.

www.stationhill.co.uk

Welcome HOPKINSH O M E S

Hopkins Homes is working closely with St Edmundsbury Borough Council to develop a vision for the regeneration and redevelopment of the Station Hill site,which will provide a vibrant and sustainable new ‘Station Quarter’ for Bury St Edmunds.

The finalisation of the masterplan will enable planning applications to be submitted to the Councilso that the long-awaited regeneration of the area can start.The site is allocated in the Adopted St. Edmundsbury Council Local Plan (Policy BSE6) as one thatshould come forward for development.

ConsultationWe are seeking your feedback on both the wider masterplan and the detailed proposals for Phase 1of the site, prior to the final masterplan being agreed with the Council and the submission of aplanning application for Phase 1.

Hopkins Homes believes that community engagement is an important part of the design process.All the responses from this consultation will be reviewed by the project team and taken onboardwherever possible. A full Statement of Community Involvement will be produced following publicconsultation.

Any subsequent amendments will be discussed with the Council prior to the production of the finalmasterplan and the submission of the Phase 1 application.

The full Station Hill masterplan document is available to download at:


HOPKINSH O M E S

A Sustainable Location


The Station Hill site is located immediately adjacent to Bury St. Edmunds railway station which is on the Cambridge to Ipswichline and approximately 250m from the town centre. The site is in easy reach of community facilities including schools, shops,restaurants, local bus routes and key employment sites.

The northern boundary of the site is defined by the railway line and much of the site currently accommodates operational railway sidings. These sidings will be relocated to facilitate the proposed redevelopment as part of a separate planning application.

The eastern boundary is formed by Station Hill which connects Tayfen Road (A1302) to Out Northgate (A1101). These routes provide access to the wider local and strategic road network, including the A14 and A11.

To the south is a currently occupied car showroom which will be retained and a former cricket ground which has been out of use for several years next to Bull Rush Crescent.

The development is expected to be undertaken in four phases. Hopkins Homes control land in Phase 1 anddevelopment here can be brought forward immediately, subject to planning approval. Hopkins Homes is also working closely with other landowners to ensure that Phases 2, 3 and 4 can be brought forward in a comprehensive and co-ordinated way.

Suffolk County Council is currently seeking to implement a bus priority scheme along Station Hill as part of their “LTP3” Transport Strategy. This would have the effect of reducing through-traffic on Station Hill, and enabling more road space to beallocated to pedestrians, whilst retaining private vehicular accesses to properties along the route.

There will be dedicated cycleroutes north and south alongStation Hill and east and westalong the southern edge of thesite. This will enable all newresidents to be within easy reachof a cycle route.

Pedestrian routes connect therailway station along Station Hillto the town centre and viaBurlingham Mill to the centralopen space and beyond.

HOPKINSH O M E S

Masterplan


The proposals are for a high quality residentialscheme of approximately 300 units and the conversion of Burlingham Mill, together with new areas of public open space.New cycle and pedestrian routes will connect to surrounding neighbourhoods.Views from the station to St. John's churchwill be retained.

Key features include:

A high quality Station Square to create a new gateway into Bury-St-Edmunds.

Renovation of the Station Master’s garden.

Main access from Station Hill linking to Burlingham Mill and Mill Square.

A new landmark building on the roundabout junction of StationHill & Tayfen Road.

A landscaped buffer to the car showroom south of the site.

A residential crescent adjacent to the recreation space, with aview to this being developed as a park.

A “woodland” character area to link to the open space beyond.

The net area of the development (excluding open space) is 3.6 ha whichresults in a density of 83 dwellings per hectare. The gross site area is6.64 ha (including all open space) which results in an overall density of 45 dwellings per hectare. This reflects the site’s proximity to the station and town centre. Higher densities will be on the eastern side of the site near the station with lower densities to the west.

HOPKINSH O M E S

Phase 1


Phase 1 will consist of 135 one-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments, with 107 two-bedroomapartments and 28 one-bedroom apartments. There will be 125 car parking spaces (includingwheel-chair accessible parking spaces close to the entrances); the ten smallest, single-bedroomunits will have cycle storage only.

There will be at least one secure, internal cycle rack space per apartment, located within the relevant apartment blocks and close to the lifts and stairs, plus some facility for external racks for visitor cycles.

ElevationsThe current scheme is divided by what will become the main access / spine road for future phases and as such,Block D (to the south of that road) will be a soft red brick to match that of Burlingham Mill, which will beimmediately adjacent to the Block D site along the spine road and seen as a piece with it from the south.

The blocks to the north toward the station will be in a buff brick, with vertical features picked out in a mix of render, light and dark boarding.

Block B features a tower at the focalpoint, forming a landmark at the crestof Station Hill and the entrance to thefuture phases.

There will be a mix of Juliet balconies and projecting or inset open balconies,depending upon aspect and situation.

Windows and doors will be in a dark grey finish.

The amenity space around the site willconsist of a variety of hard and softlandscaped areas and planting

Phase 1 overview looking towards railway station Site plan of Phase 1

HOPKINSH O M E S

Phase 1


Storey heightsThe ground floor level of Block A will be 37.550m with storey heights of nominally 3 metres, so thebasement storey will be at a floor level of 34.550m. The height of the block from the ground will vary from 12 metres at the southern end and, within the courtyard to 15 metres at the extreme north-eastern corner where the ground dips away sharply and the three basement flats are located.

The ground floor level of Block B will be 38.200m. The bulk of Block B will be around 12 metres high (4 storeys) with a feature tower rising a further two storeys to approximately 18 metres (6 storeys).

The ground floor level of Block C will be 37.750m and the whole block will be four storeys tall(approximately 12 metres), though there will be a link to Block B that is one storey lower – this willcontain a duplex apartment on the first and second storeys.

The ground floor level of Block D will be 38.200m and the bulk of the building will be four storeys(approximately 12 metres) high, with the rear wing being one storey lower at approximately 9metres.

View from station car park

Internal courtyard

Landmark feature at the crest of Station Hill

HOPKINSH O M E S

For further information please contact:

Engage Planning LtdUniversity of Warwick Science ParkWarwick Innovation CentreWarwick Technology ParkWarwickCV34 6UW

Tel: 01926 623095

Or visit the website:www.stationhill.co.uk

Thank you for attending this public exhibition.

Next Steps


Please take your timeto fill in one of thefeedback forms provided. Your viewsare important and willbe considered as partof the consultationprocess.

engageplanningC O M M U N I T Y C O N S U L T A N T S

About Hopkins Homes

Hopkins Homes has established an enviable reputation for developing well designed, high quality,award-winning, residential developments that harmonise and add interest to its local context.

It is a company local to East Anglia and has considerable experience of development in the region, where it has succeeded in delivering developments which respect and improve neighbourhoods and add to local distinctiveness.

Within Bury St Edmunds, Hopkins Homes has already brought forward high quality residential schemes at Cotton Lane, Risbygate Street, Drovers Lane and, most recently, at Eastgate Street.

The Council is expected to adopt the masterplan brief in September2013 after reviewing the comments received through consultation. Following the adoption of the masterplan, Hopkins Homes will submit afull planning application for Phase 1. The Council will then undertake aperiod of statutory consultation on the Phase 1 application. Subject toplanning approval and vacant possession, development will thencommence.

station hill, bury st edmunds masterplan consultation

Documents