status of the sm18 equipment
DESCRIPTION
Status of the SM18 Equipment. A. Siemko On behalf of the MTM-TF Team. Outline. SM18 Equipment 2004 Summary and issues S4 Equipment Software/Hardware Consolidation Foresight 2005 : Risks of Mishaps Conclusions. Allocation of the 12 Test Benches. MB (SSS). F. E. MB. D. MB (SSS). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
COLD TEST REVIEW
AT/MTM
Status of the SM18 Equipment Status of the SM18 Equipment
A. Siemko
On behalf of the MTM-TF Team
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
OutlineOutline
SM18 Equipment 2004 Summary and issues
S4 Equipment Software/Hardware Consolidation Foresight 2005 : Risks of Mishaps
Conclusions
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Allocation of the 12 Test Benches
MB
SSS (MB)TBD2-S4
SSS (MB)TBB1-S4
MB
MB (SSS)
A
B
C
D
E
FMB (SSS)
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Design Test Rate and ThroughputDesign Test Rate and Throughput
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Mar-02
Jun-02
Sep-02
Dec-02
Mar-03
Jun-03
Sep-03
Dec-03
Mar-04
Jun-04
Sep-04
Dec-04
Mar-05
Jun-05
Sep-05
Dec-05
Mar-06
Jun-06
Sep-06
Dec-06
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Average Test Capacity (magnets/month)
Accumulated Test Output
Simulation of 02/ 2003, see Chamonix 2003
Nominal Rate
Max Rate
Over last quarter of 2004: Nominal design test rate has been established Max. design test rate has been confirmed
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Status of anticryostatsStatus of anticryostats
Type
Length
Nr. of units
Status
Dipole
16728
24
Nr.: ACD 01; 02; 03; 04; 05; 06; 09;10; 11; 12; 14; 15; 16; 17; 18; 20; 21; 22; 25; 26; 27; 28; 29; 30
Damaged 06; 18
SSS
7828
12
Nr.: ACS 01; 02; 03; 04; 05; 06; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 18
Damaged 01; 05
CFB
2809
28
Nr.: ACC 01; 02; 03; 04; 05; 07; 08; 09; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16; 17; 18; 19; 20; 22; 23; 24; 25; 26; 29; 30; 31; 32
SSS F2
11476
2
Nr.: AC.F2 01; 02
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Status of ceramic shafts and TRU’sStatus of ceramic shafts and TRU’s
Type
Nr. of units
Status
Dipole shafts
9
Nr.: 22; 23; 24; 25; 26; 27; 28, 29; 30
OK; Not calibrated
SSS shafts
4
Nr.: 35; 36; 37; 38
OK; Not calibrated
TRU’s
7
Nr.: 01; 02; 03; 04; 05; 07
OK;
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
S4 Equipment S4 Equipment Three Magnet Families for Testing Three Magnet Families for Testing
Taking into account magnet lengths, cold feet positions , jack positions, powering and availability of magnetic measurement systems, Special SSS units were grouped in 3 main families.
Families:
Family 1: 11670 mm, 10715 mm
Family 2: 9310 mm, 8335 mm
Family 3: 6935 mm, 5660 mm
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Schematic view of the test bench with the extension module used for the 3rd family (6935 mm, 5660 mm)
Baseline layout on the SM 18 test Baseline layout on the SM 18 test benchesbenches
1275 mm
C
F
B
8293 mm
6935 mm
Extension
MRB
Module
5660 mm
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
The test benches TBB1 and TBD2 are design and procured to accept magnets in 11 mechanical configurations
Dipole configuration Arc SSS configuration 9 S4 configurations
First four configurations were tested on TBB1 and relevant equipment commissioned
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Chaconsa + SSW Chaconsa + SSW Layout for family 1Layout for family 1
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Chaconsa or TRUChaconsa or TRULayout for family 3Layout for family 3
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Equipment Dedicated to S4 TestingEquipment Dedicated to S4 Testing
The anticryostats
For the magnetic measurements on the test benches magnets must be equipped with the anticryostats
Anticryostats of three new lengths are required
The extension modules
For adapting one type of the anti-cryostat to several magnet lengths of one family, extension modules are required. They will be located between the magnet and the MRB
Three types of rigid extension are required
Wide aperture magnets (ø=70mm)
For Q4 in IR1,2,5,6,8; Q5 in IR2,4,6,8; Q6 in IR4, the adaptation pieces have to be developed in order to fix actual anti-cryostats in wider apertures.
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
S4 and Arc SSS Anticryostat S4 and Arc SSS Anticryostat ProductionProduction
All components ready, except heating elements for S4 families
Missing heaters are due to be delivered these days (today!?)
Production of additional Arc SSS type anticryostats put on stand-by (waiting for the conclusions of this review)
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
““Mobile” ChaconsaMobile” Chaconsa
All components procured and ready
First system assembled on TBB1 and pre-commissioned (Q9 – family 2)
Support structures of second system are under final assembly stage on the TBD2
Second Chaconsa put on stand-by.
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Software and controls Software and controls consolidationconsolidation
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Software and controls Software and controls consolidationconsolidation
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Powering AspectsPowering Aspects
All essential equipment is operational All 13kA commuting switches were upgraded (motorized)
3 major incidents concerning 13 kA cables encountered over 2004 Repair has cost substantial effort and resources Preventive pressure test to be carried out
Two 60/120A commuting switches delivered this week for clusters TBB and TBD
Two 120A Power Converters are still missing
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Worries and MishapsWorries and Mishaps
Although over 2004 all essential equipment was operational and obeying well the design-allocated downtime, the first examples of important equipment wear out and/or mishaps were experienced: Damage to the anticryostats Several brakes in case of measuring shafts Loss of several voltage taps integrated with the
current leads Severe wear out (damage) of the 13kA current
lead’s extremities
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Worries and MishapsWorries and Mishaps Silver shoe – TBC2 Silver shoe – TBC2
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Worries and MishapsWorries and MishapsSilver shoe – TBB1Silver shoe – TBB1
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Worries and MishapsWorries and Mishaps Silver shoe – TBD2 Silver shoe – TBD2
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Silver shoe crisisSilver shoe crisis
Series of actions launched, in particular:
Study of two repair scenarios Procurement of tooling for maintenance and repair Production of additional spare parts
Due to start soon:
Training of ICS operators Change of the installation procedures Procurement of the final tolling for changed
procedures (TS resources required!)
Regular preventive inspection and maintenance of the test benches after at most 10 magnet tests
A. Siemko AT-MTM Cold Test Review - 14 January 2005
Conclusions Conclusions Over 2004 all essential equipment was available and operational,
obeying well the design-allocated downtime, in particular this applies to:
Electronics and measuring systems for which the preventive maintenance is in place Powering – even though several significant mishaps Controls and software - even though several developments are not completed
Over the last quarter of 2004 the nominal design test rate for the 12 benches has been established and the max. design test rate has been confirmed
Dedicated S4 equipment (already procured and undergoing procurement) will allow to test in SM18 all types of the Special SSS’s
An economic solution was worked out Major R&D was not needed Most of the technologies and measuring systems were adapted (redeployed)
The silver shoe crisis receives at present particular consideration!
It has drawn attention to the importance of the preventive inspections and maintenance, even if not anticipated by the design