steering committee #1 april 25, 2017 - dejong-richter · 2017. 4. 26. · paradigms sir ken...

GREENE COUNTY SCHOOLS

FACILITY MASTER PLAN

STEERING COMMITTEE #1


APRIL 25, 2017

GREENE COUNTY SCHOOLS 1

A G E N D A

• Introductions• Timeline• Steering Committee Roles• Futures Presentation• Background Data – GIS, Enrollment, Capacity, Condition• Community Dialogue #1 Preparation• Next Steps & Adjourn


I N T R O D U C T I O N S

Mr. Tracy Richter, REFP/President, Cooperative Strategies Ohio Office

Mr. Ken Upchurch, Managing Principal, TCU

Mr. Matt Sachs, GIS Analyst, Cooperative Strategies

Mr. Raynor Boles, Project Manager, TCU


P R O C E S S

Community Engagement▪ Steering Committee – 4 meetings▪ 2 Community Meetings – 4 nights, 1 at each high school

Data Collection▪ School Condition/Capacity▪ Enrollment & Demographics▪ Curriculum & Academics

Scenario Development▪ Combine:

▪ Facility Data, Demographics, Educational Framework & Community Input

▪ Create Scenarios for:▪ Condition Improvement, Enrollment Balance, etc…

Recommendations Development

School Board Presentation


T I M E L I N E

Meeting Date Time Location

Steering Committee #1 Tuesday, April 25th 6 pm - 8:30 pmSouth Greene High

School

Community Dialogue #1 Monday, May 15th 6 pm - 8 pmSouth Greene High

School

Community Dialogue #1 Tuesday, May 16th 6 pm - 8 pmNorth Greene High

School

Steering Committee #2 Tuesday, June 6th 6 pm - 8:30 pmChuckey Doak High

School

Options Worksession TBD

Steering Committee #3 TBD

Community Dialogue #2 Monday, August 21st 6 pm - 8 pmChuckey Doak High

School

Community Dialogue #2 Tuesday, August 22nd 6 pm - 8 pmWest Greene High

School

Recommendations Worksession TBD

Steering Committee #4 TBD

Present Master Plan to Board Board Meeting RoomOctober 2017

Summer 2017

TBD, August 2017

TBD, September 2017

TBD, September 2017


S T E E R I N G C O M M I T T E EROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES

1. Serve in an advisory capacity to theSchool Board, the Consultant and to

the District

2. Attend ALL Committee Meetings

3. Review data and be prepared foreach meeting

4. Be objective and maintain a Districtlevel perspective

5. Be open to all possibilities

6. Committee members do not use themedia as a platform for personal

agendas

7. Communicate work and outcomes tothe Community

8. Gather feedback from the Community

9. Actively recruit participants forcommunity meetings

10. Facilitate small group discussions atcommunity meetings


S T E E R I N G C O M M I T T E EROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES

Rules of Engagement

1. Speak from the Data

2. Provide constructive criticism

3. Engage in productive dialogue

Committee Co-Chairs

• Nominate Committee Members to serve as Co-Chairs

• Attend Options Worksession and Recommendations Worksession


FUTURES CONFERENCE


E N V I S I O N I N G C H A N G E

Creating a Facilities PlanBUT LET’S NOT TALK ABOUT FACILITIES!!!

“…; a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defense of custom. But the tumult soon subsides. Time makes more converts than reason.”

Common Sense, Thomas Paine 1776


E N V I S I O N I N G C H A N G E

Important! To make the most of these exercises you must consider how some current norms are likely to change in the upcoming 5-10-15 years

• Standardized test requirements• Job descriptions• Cost of technology tools & infrastructure• Budgets in general• Norms for instructional practices


V I D E O

https://www.thersa.org/discover/videos/rsa-animate/2010/10/rsa-animate---changing-paradigms

Sir Ken Robinson – Changing Paradigms

https://www.thersa.org/discover/videos/rsa-animate/2010/10/rsa-animate---changing-paradigms


G L O B A L V I L L A G E

Region 2008 2050

Asia 60.4 59.1

Africa 14.5 19.8

Europe 10.9 7

Latin America/Caribbean 8.6 9.1

North America 5 4.4

Oceania 0.5 0.5

Current World Population: 7,500,277,225


K E Y L E A R N I N G I N G R E D I E N T S

HobbesThesis-Antithesis-

Synthesis

Observing

Imagining

Testing

RefiningAristotle v. Plato

Observation is the start of learning


K E Y L E A R N I N G I N G R E D I E N T S

Observing

Imagining

Testing

Refining

Balancing Skill & Scale, Time & Mastery

When we observe without imagining…….. TTWWADI

When we imagine without observing……...fantasy

When we test without refining…………...…..judging

When refine without testing……………...…..busywork


O R G A N I Z AT I O N A L C U LT U R E

for

Culture

Values

Habits

History

Rewards

Punishments

Systems


S T U D E N T G O A L S

What do we want our students to be able to do when they leave Greene County Schools to be able to succeed and thrive in the world?

….and how do we create learning environments that support this?


K E Y L E A R N I N G VA R I A B L E S

Balancing Skill & Scale, Time & Mastery

Time & Mastery

If the time students have to learn a concept is fixed, learning will be the variable.

If mastery is fixed, time will be the variable


S C H O O L FA C I L I T I E S I N S TA G E S

Stage 1: One Room School House



Stage 2 : Industrial Schools



Stage 3: Baby Boom Schools



Stage 4: Open Concept



Stage 5: Learning Communities



Stage 6: What do we name this???


I M A G I N I N G A N E W P K - 1 2 S Y S T E M

Deconstructing “yesterday’s” school model

Exercise •What are you doing right?

What is the Vision of Education for Greene County Schools…?

• Elementary Schools• Middle Schools• High Schools

What are the obstacles in the way?

If we don’t define how we would operate in an ideal

world

we cannot expect to lead meaningful

change in the real one

Source: Ken Robinson’s “Changing Educational Paradigms”


S M A L L G R O U P W O R K

Small Group Exercise Please Answer 2 Questions1. Challenges of the Facilities Plan2. Expectations of the Facilities Plan


BACKGROUND DATA


G E N E R A L D E M O G R A P H I C S

Year Single-family Multi-Family

2000 269 13

2001 259 20

2002 281 16

2003 319 29

2004 371 22

2005 381 108

2006 357 21

2007 280 12

2008 175 10

2009 116 6

2010 130 6

2011 105 2

2012 88 40

2013 93 50

2014 87 7

2015 105 0

2016* 12 0

Source: SOCDS Building Permits Database

# OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED

*preliminary

GREENE COUNTY, TN

Age 2016 Estimate 2021 Estimate

Ages 0-2 2,040 1,891

Ages 3-4 1,390 1,300

Ages 5-10 4,535 4,332

Ages 11-13 2,415 2,453

Ages 14-18 3,948 4,096

Ages 5-18 10,898 10,881

Total Population 69,139 69,212

Source: ESRI BIS

GREENE COUNTY POPULATION ESTIMATES

-

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

Ages 0-2 Ages 3-4 Ages 5-10 Ages 11-13 Ages 14-18

GREENE COUNTY

POPULATION ESTIMATES

2016 Estimate 2021 Estimate

Background Report Page 6 & 7


G I SGEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Data Collection

• Student databases• Attendance

boundaries• School points• Other geographic

features

Background Report Page 14


G I SSTUDENT DENSITY MAPBackground Report Page 15


L I V E / AT T E N D A N A LY S I S

Bai

ley

ton

ES

Cam

p C

reek

ES

Ch

uck

ey E

S

DeB

usk

ES

Do

ak E

S

Gle

nw

oo

d E

S

McD

oan

ld E

S

Mo

shei

m E

S

No

lach

uck

ey E

S

Ott

way

ES

Wes

t P

ines

ES

Ch

uck

ey D

oak

MS

Ch

uck

ey D

oak

HS

No

rth

Gre

ene

HS

So

uth

Gre

ene

HS

Wes

t G

reen

e H

S

Liv

e-In

Tra

nsf

er O

ut

% T

ran

sfer

Ou

t

Baileyton ES 220 - 2 2 - - - 5 2 3 5 1 - - - - 240 20 8.3%

Camp Creek ES - 257 2 17 22 3 - 3 12 - 3 14 - - - - 333 76 22.8%

Chuckey ES 2 3 311 - 30 - - 2 - 2 - - - - - - 350 39 11.1%

DeBusk ES - 4 1 211 6 6 - 5 9 - 1 5 - - - - 248 37 14.9%

Doak ES 3 9 14 6 404 1 - 2 2 2 3 - - - - - 446 42 9.4%

Glenwood ES 2 2 - 20 2 169 - 13 6 2 - 2 - - - - 218 49 22.5%

McDonald ES - - - 3 1 - 302 47 2 - - - - - - - 355 53 14.9%

Mosheim ES 9 1 1 4 6 14 14 792 4 3 3 7 - - - - 858 66 7.7%

Nolachuckey ES - 6 1 25 1 5 - 5 262 - 1 1 - - - - 307 45 14.7%

Ottway ES 46 - 2 4 9 1 - 22 - 209 - 11 - - - - 304 95 31.3%

West Pines ES 12 - 8 - 5 - - - - 4 174 9 - - - - 212 38 17.9%

Chuckey Doak MS 4 9 - 3 - - - 4 2 5 3 386 - - - - 416 30 7.2%

Chuckey Doak HS - - - - - - - - - - - - 509 13 15 6 543 34 6.3%

North Greene HS - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 359 4 15 409 50 12.2%

South Greene HS - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 3 416 8 444 28 6.3%

West Greene HS - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 5 57 575 648 73 11.3%

City 2 1 1 10 19 4 - 24 3 2 - 6 14 4 7 11 108 - -

Out of District/Unmatched 7 3 11 5 10 3 5 9 14 3 5 10 28 6 11 6 136 - -

Attend 307 295 354 310 515 206 321 933 318 235 198 452 610 390 510 621

Live & Attend 220 257 311 211 404 169 302 792 262 209 174 386 509 359 416 575

Transfer In 87 38 43 99 111 37 19 141 56 26 24 66 101 31 94 46

% Transfer In 28.3% 12.9% 12.1% 31.9% 21.6% 18.0% 5.9% 15.1% 17.6% 11.1% 12.1% 14.6% 16.6% 7.9% 18.4% 7.4%

*All student transfer numbers are based on attendance boundary data provided by Greene County GIS Department and Greene County Schools

Greene County Schools

2016-17 K-12 Live/Attend

Attend

Liv

e-In

Total K-12

Students: 6,575



G E N E R A L D E M O G R A P H I C S

Year Greene County

2000 781

2001 702

2002 730

2003 739

2004 714

2005 741

2006 711

2007 753

2008 713

2009 724

2010 616

2011 605

2012 601

2013 643

2014 651

RESIDENT LIVE BIRTH COUNTS

Source: Tennessee Department of Health, Tennessee Birth

Statistical System

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

GREENE COUNTY, TN

RESIDENT LIVE BIRTH COUNTS



• Uses historic live birth data and historic student enrollment to “age” (or progress) a known population (cohort) throughout the school grades

• Survival ratios analyzed

• Projection ratios developed

C O H O RT S U RV I VA L M E T H O D


S U RV I VA L R AT I O S

Survival Ratios - District-wide

from to Birth to K K to 1 Birth to 1 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 4 to 5 5 to 6 6 to 7 7 to 8 8 to 9 9 to 10 10 to 11 11 to 12

2007 2008 73.88% 101.12% 74.52% 98.01% 98.17% 102.36% 98.69% 102.09% 99.81% 106.26% 107.78% 97.04% 86.69% 107.29%

2008 2009 70.45% 102.38% 75.64% 99.08% 96.67% 100.37% 98.05% 98.48% 100.00% 99.02% 109.43% 98.49% 83.95% 108.05%

2009 2010 75.84% 107.95% 76.05% 97.32% 99.44% 100.57% 99.44% 100.72% 101.16% 102.05% 108.48% 89.38% 91.14% 104.21%

2010 2011 71.87% 103.20% 78.27% 96.13% 94.85% 101.31% 98.86% 100.19% 100.36% 100.95% 102.37% 97.45% 96.04% 100.00%

2011 2012 71.71% 102.54% 73.70% 91.55% 99.04% 97.29% 96.50% 99.42% 101.31% 100.18% 103.59% 99.29% 95.52% 98.75%

2012 2013 74.75% 101.67% 72.91% 94.27% 99.06% 100.77% 102.19% 101.15% 101.55% 99.08% 104.29% 97.63% 92.28% 100.00%

2013 2014 65.19% 98.69% 73.77% 91.26% 101.42% 94.11% 102.50% 100.78% 98.68% 102.10% 104.46% 97.77% 99.81% 99.22%

2014 2015 71.92% 102.75% 66.99% 93.35% 91.82% 97.01% 98.79% 97.57% 98.65% 100.57% 100.37% 99.47% 96.32% 97.38%

2015 2016 69.92% 102.93% 74.03% 94.43% 101.43% 103.48% 101.03% 102.45% 102.11% 104.12% 96.77% 96.10% 97.14% 94.91%

mean simple all years 71.73% 102.58% 73.99% 95.04% 97.99% 99.70% 99.56% 100.32% 100.40% 101.59% 104.17% 96.96% 93.21% 101.09%

std. dev. simple all years 3.13% 2.44% 3.08% 2.78% 3.12% 2.97% 1.97% 1.60% 1.23% 2.37% 4.06% 3.03% 5.19% 4.47%

mean simple 5 years 70.70% 101.72% 72.28% 92.97% 98.55% 98.53% 100.20% 100.27% 100.46% 101.21% 101.90% 98.05% 96.22% 98.05%

std. dev. simple 5 years 3.53% 1.76% 2.99% 1.49% 3.95% 3.64% 2.53% 1.86% 1.66% 1.95% 3.31% 1.38% 2.73% 2.00%





mean weighted all years 70.65% 102.23% 72.61% 93.83% 98.31% 99.57% 100.28% 100.48% 100.49% 101.89% 101.19% 97.40% 96.00% 98.01%

std. dev. weighted all years 3.02% 1.95% 3.40% 1.89% 4.08% 3.65% 1.88% 1.97% 1.61% 2.01% 3.93% 2.12% 3.31% 3.21%

mean weighted 5 years 70.18% 102.29% 72.13% 93.69% 98.77% 100.37% 100.58% 100.85% 100.76% 102.57% 99.23% 97.33% 96.93% 96.45%

std. dev. weighted 5 years 2.52% 1.53% 3.38% 1.22% 4.61% 4.05% 1.57% 2.29% 1.83% 2.00% 3.33% 1.63% 1.74% 2.03%





• Average 71.3% of all births in the county show up at kindergarten 5 years later


H I S T O R I C A L E N R O L L M E N T

Historical Enrollment - District-wide

Grade 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

PK NA 259 299 289 296 300 286 270 283 267

K 538 546 503 562 511 540 533 472 443 423

1 552 544 559 543 580 524 549 526 485 456

2 546 541 539 544 522 531 494 501 491 458

3 551 536 523 536 516 517 526 501 460 498

4 533 564 538 526 543 502 521 495 486 476

5 526 526 553 535 520 524 513 534 489 491

6 513 537 518 557 536 517 530 517 521 501

7 559 512 537 524 559 543 525 523 510 532

8 553 594 507 548 529 560 538 536 526 531

9 642 596 650 550 561 548 584 562 538 509

10 616 623 587 581 536 557 535 571 559 517

11 535 534 523 535 558 512 514 534 550 543

12 553 574 577 545 535 551 512 510 520 522

Grand Total 7,217 7,486 7,413 7,375 7,302 7,226 7,160 7,052 6,861 6,724

Source: Greene County Schools


Grade 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

PK NA 259 299 289 296 300 286 270 283 267

K - 5 3,246 3,257 3,215 3,246 3,192 3,138 3,136 3,029 2,854 2,802

6 - 8 1,625 1,643 1,562 1,629 1,624 1,620 1,593 1,576 1,557 1,564

9 - 12 2,346 2,327 2,337 2,211 2,190 2,168 2,145 2,177 2,167 2,091

Grand Total 7,217 7,486 7,413 7,375 7,302 7,226 7,160 7,052 6,861 6,724

Source: Greene County Schools

Bac

kg

rou

nd

Rep

ort

P

age

9


H I S T O R I C A L E N R O L L M E N T

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000


• Decreased by 493 students over the past ten years (7,217 in 2007-08 to 6,724 in 2016-17)

• Kindergarten enrollment dropped from 540 in 2012-13 to 423 in 2016-17



P R O J E C T E D E N R O L L M E N T

Projected Enrollment - Recommended - District-wide

Grade 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27

PK 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267

K 429 457 464 453 455 457 457 456 457 457

1 435 438 468 476 463 467 467 467 467 467

2 434 413 418 449 453 439 443 445 444 444

3 452 428 407 414 440 445 434 438 439 439

4 500 450 428 408 413 443 446 434 437 441

5 483 507 458 436 413 419 447 452 442 443

6 494 484 508 458 438 415 421 449 454 445

7 504 496 485 513 459 438 419 421 452 459

8 548 516 508 500 525 472 451 430 436 465

9 533 553 526 511 505 534 480 456 436 441

10 497 520 540 513 498 493 522 467 446 426

11 500 480 502 522 496 478 475 503 454 431

12 536 493 475 495 515 490 475 470 497 447

Grand Total 6,612 6,502 6,454 6,415 6,340 6,257 6,204 6,155 6,128 6,072

Source: Cooperative Strategies



P R O J E C T E D E N R O L L M E N T

• Projected decrease of 384 students in the next five years

Projected Enrollment - Recommended - District-wide

Grade 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27

PK 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267

K - 5 2,733 2,693 2,643 2,636 2,637 2,670 2,694 2,692 2,686 2,691

6 - 8 1,546 1,496 1,501 1,471 1,422 1,325 1,291 1,300 1,342 1,369

9 - 12 2,066 2,046 2,043 2,041 2,014 1,995 1,952 1,896 1,833 1,745

Grand Total 6,612 6,502 6,454 6,415 6,340 6,257 6,204 6,155 6,128 6,072

Source: Cooperative Strategies

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Projected Enrollment - Recommended -

District-wide



CAPACITY ANALYSIS


C A PA C I T Y M E T H O D O L O G Y

“As Programmed” Capacity

• Counted use of all teaching stations and multiplied by class size for each specific room type

• Specialty spaces (art, music, gym, etc.) given capacity at middle and high school, but not at elementary/K-8 buildings

• Middle and high schools multiplied by 85% load factor

Grade Class Size

PK 20

K 20

1 20

2 20

3 20

4 25

5 25

6 25

7 25

8 25

9 25

10 25

11 25

12 25

Career Tech 20

SPED (Self-

Contained)10


“A S P R O G R A M M E D ” C A PA C I T YELEMENTARY/K-8

Total

Teaching

Stations

Specialty

Spaces

SPED (Self -

Contained)

Net

ClassroomsPortables

Permanent

Capacity

Portable

CapacityTotal Permanent

Total w/

Portables

Elementary

Baileyton Elementary 19 1 0 18 1 410 20 430 335 81.7% 77.9%

Camp Creek Elementary 20 1 0 19 0 430 0 430 305 70.9% 70.9%

Chuckey Elementary 20 0 0 20 0 430 0 430 390 90.7% 90.7%

DeBusk Elementary 18 1 0 17 2 380 50 430 326 85.8% 75.8%

Doak Elementary 31 2 2 27 0 600 0 600 551 91.8% 91.8%

Glenwood Elementary 12 0 0 12 0 265 0 265 216 81.5% 81.5%

McDonald Elementary 21 2 0 19 0 430 0 430 335 77.9% 77.9%

Mosheim Elementary 52 3 3 46 0 1,060 0 1,060 968 91.3% 91.3%

Nolachuckey Elementary 22 3 0 19 0 430 0 430 331 77.0% 77.0%

Ottway Elementary 16 1 0 15 1 345 20 365 254 73.6% 69.6%

West Pines Elementary 10 0 0 10 0 230 0 230 191 83.0% 83.0%

Total 241 14 5 222 4 5,010 90 5,100 4,202 83.9% 82.4%

"As Programmed"

Utilization

School Name

"As Programmed"2016-17

Enrollment

(w/ PK)

• 83.9% District-wide permanent utilization (4,202 students / 5,010 total permanent capacity)



“A S P R O G R A M M E D ” C A PA C I T YMIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL

• 105.1% permanent utilization at Chuckey Doak MS (433 students / 412 permanent capacity)

• 85.2% District-wide permanent utilization at high school level (2,091 students / 2,453 total permanent capacity)

Total

Teaching

Stations

Specialty

Spaces

Career

Tech

SPED (Self -

Contained)Portables

Permanent

Capacity

Portable


Total w/

Portables

Middle

Chuckey Doak Middle 20 5 0 1 3 412 64 476 433 105.1% 91.0%

High

Chuckey Doak High 36 6 10 1 0 710 0 710 607 85.5% 85.5%

North Greene High 24 5 5 0 0 489 0 489 398 81.4% 81.4%

South Greene High 28 5 5 1 1 561 21 582 492 87.7% 84.5%

West Greene High 35 8 9 1 0 693 0 693 594 85.7% 85.7%

Total 123 24 29 3 1 2,453 21 2,474 2,091 85.2% 84.5%

"As Programmed"

Utilization

School Name

"As Programmed"2016-17

Enrollment

(w/ PK)



C A PA C I T Y M E T H O D O L O G Y

Recommended Capacity

• Based on the design/intended use of all teaching stations

• Counted all room types and multiplied by average class size for each grade configuration

• 10% of total teaching station count at elementary/K-8 level removed for specialty spaces (art, music, resource, etc.)

• Specialty spaces (art, music, gym, etc.) given capacity at middle and high school, but not at elementary/K-8 buildings

• Middle and high schools multiplied by 85% load factor

Grade Class Size

PK 20

K 20

1 20

2 20

3 20

4 25

5 25

6 25

7 25

8 25

9 25

10 25

11 25

12 25

Career Tech 20

SPED (Self-

Contained)10


R E C O M M E N D E D C A PA C I T YELEMENTARY/K-8

• 80.3% District-wide permanent utilization (4,202 students / 5,232 total permanent capacity)

Total

Teaching

Stations

Specialty

Spaces

SPED (Self -

Contained)

Net

ClassroomsPortables

Permanent

Capacity

Portable


Total

w/Portables

Elementary

Baileyton Elementary 21 3 0 18 1 410 23 433 335 81.7% 77.4%

Camp Creek Elementary 20 2 0 18 0 410 0 410 305 74.4% 74.4%

Chuckey Elementary 22 3 0 19 2 412 43 455 390 94.7% 85.7%

DeBusk Elementary 18 2 0 16 2 364 46 410 326 89.6% 79.5%

Doak Elementary 39 4 2 33 0 735 0 735 551 75.0% 75.0%

Glenwood Elementary 12 2 0 10 3 228 68 296 216 94.7% 73.0%

McDonald Elementary 23 3 0 20 0 456 0 456 335 73.5% 73.5%

Mosheim Elementary 58 6 3 49 0 1,146 0 1,146 968 84.5% 84.5%

Nolachuckey Elementary 22 3 0 19 0 433 0 433 331 76.4% 76.4%

Ottway Elementary 17 2 0 15 1 342 23 365 254 74.3% 69.6%

West Pines Elementary 15 2 0 13 3 296 68 364 191 64.5% 52.5%

Total 267 32 5 230 12 5,232 271 5,503 4,202 80.3% 76.4%

Recommended/Maximum

School Name

2016-17

Enrollment

(w/ PK)

Utilization based on




R E C O M M E N D E D C A PA C I T YMIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL

• 99.8% permanent utilization at Chuckey Doak MS (433 students / 434 permanent capacity)

• 82.7% District-wide permanent utilization at high school level (2,091 students / 2,529 total permanent capacity)

Total

Teaching

Stations

Specialty

Spaces

Career

Tech

SPED (Self -

Contained)Portables

Permanent

Capacity

Portable


Total

w/Portables

Middle

Chuckey Doak Middle 21 6 0 1 4 434 85 519 433 99.8% 83.4%

High

Chuckey Doak High 37 6 11 1 0 727 0 727 607 83.5% 83.5%

North Greene High 24 5 5 0 0 489 0 489 398 81.4% 81.4%

South Greene High 30 5 6 1 1 599 21 620 492 82.1% 79.4%

West Greene High 36 8 9 1 0 714 0 714 594 83.2% 83.2%

Total 127 24 31 3 1 2,529 21 2,550 2,091 82.7% 82.0%

Recommended/Maximum

School Name

2016-17

Enrollment

(w/ PK)

Utilization based on




COMMUNITY DIALOGUE #1


C O M M U N I T Y D I A L O G U E # 1COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES

Project Website – Community Access

▪ On District Website

▪ Meeting Agendas & Presentations

▪ Background Reports

▪ Community Meeting Results

Community Meetings: On-Line Surveys

▪ Presentation/Background Information

▪ On-Line Surveys – Allow for Additional Participation


C O M M U N I T Y D I A L O G U E # 1EDUCATIONAL FRAMEWORK

Educational Framework Topics

▪ Preferred School Size

▪ Class Size

▪ Preferred Grade Configuration

▪ Programmatic Offerings

▪ Technology

▪ Accessibility to Facilities (Transportation Time, Proximity to Schools)


C O M M U N I T Y D I A L O G U E # 1EDUCATIONAL FRAMEWORK

Steering Committee Role

▪ Recruit Participants to Attend Community Meetings

▪ Facilitate Small Groups

• Half at each CD #1 meeting (5/15 & 5/16)


Choose Steering Committee Co-Chairs

Community Dialogue #1

▪ May 15th – South Greene High School, 6 p.m.

▪ May 16th – North Greene High School, 6 p.m.

Steering Committee #2

▪ June 6th – Chuckey Doak High School, 6 – 8:30 p.m.

Project Web Site: www.dejongrichter.com/greenek12

• Facility Master Plan Project link also on Greene County Schools website (www.greenek12.org)

N E X T S T E P S
http://www.dejongrichter.com/greenek12http://www.greenek12.org/

steering committee #1 april 25, 2017 - dejong-richter · 2017. 4. 26. · paradigms sir ken...

Documents