STRATEGIC PLAN 2016 - 2025Towards enabling systemic change

to give India’s street girls a life and future that counts

January  2016

The  Rainbow  Homes  program

The Rainbow Home Formula

• Target group: street girls 4-18 years old

• Accommodation in existing school buildings• Open, non-custodial homes

• Provision of basic needs (food, clothing, health care)• Education in regular school: integration with peers/regular students• Strong focus on the individual child

• Re-integration into mainstream Indian society• Freedom and respect for diversity

• Guidance to become responsible citizens

Strategy of the Rainbow Homes Program• Scalable and replicable: Development and roll out of a franchise model results in an

extensive network of Rainbow Homes• Creating social value: Education and trainings enable the Rainbow girls to participate in

and contribute to the Indian society• Management on quality laid down in manuals• Low costs and cost efficiency in India

• Transparency: Professional financial audits by Deloitte, KPI-reporting, program audit by Tata Institute of Social Sciences (2011) and Unicef (2015)

• Indian ownership: Partnership with Indian government, advocacy to influence the government for replication of the model with emphasis on greater government accountability, civil society engagement

• A sound financial basis and low costs in the NLs (5% overhead 2015)

Rainbow Home Child Care Plan

Rainbow  Home  age  btw  4-­‐14  yrsEducation  till  10th  class

• Bridge  course,  regular  school  education  etc.

PreparatoryReintegration  age  btw  15-­‐18/20  yrs

• Vocational  training,  degree,  life  skills,  professional  course

Reintegrationage  above  18/20

• Job  settlement,  marriage,  family,  social  network

7

Kolkata  – 6

Delhi  – 2  

Hyderabad-­ 9

Bangalore  -­ 4

Patna  -­ 4

Chennai  -­ 2

Present  Girls

Rainbow  Homes

Cities

Partners

82329

2628

Current  network

Anantapur -­ 1

Pune  -­ 1

As  per  Annual  Report  PF  2015

Results  2002  -­‐ 2015

Results so far: Within Rainbow structure• 2.628 girls are currently living in the

Rainbow Homes • 3.334 Rainbow alumni have lived in a

Rainbow Home since 2002 *)

3.334  Alumni

Impacting  a  total  of  5.962  girls

2.628  Rainbows

Results so far: Outside Rainbow structure through advocacy

Boys  Homes  (Sneh Ghars) Government  Homes  

City #  Homes

#  Children

Kolkata 15* 1.550

Hyderabad 4 200

Total (est.) 19 1.750

*  10  additional  homes  under  development  and  expected  to  be  opened  in  spring  2016

Impacting  a  total  of  3.025children  (2.655 excl.  

outflow)

The  boys  homes  are  being  run  by  Rainbow  partners  and  sponsored  by  Indian  corporates  and  the  Government

City #  Homes #  Boys

Delhi 1 140

Hyderabad 11 579

Bangalore 1 41

Patna 2 145

Total  actual 15 905

Total  incl. outflow 1.275

Results so far: Additional impact1. Government adopted the RH model as best practice for comprehensive care for street children in its SSA

(Education for all policy, 2011), herewith creating guidelines and budget for state authorities to open government sponsored homes

2. RFI increasingly participates in policy influencing and development: F.e. new orphan policy Telangana and policy for the care for street children above 14 yrs in Tamil Nadu

3. RH’s strongly embedded in Indian society: Increasing government funding (€ 550K budget 2015/16), first multi annual commitments by Indian corporate sponsors and growing number of individual sponsors in cash and kind (€ 750K 2015/16), 245 volunteers -mainly young professionals from Indian corporates- engaging with the Rainbows

4. Increased visibility for homeless children and the RH’s through events with large media coverage: Walkathons in Hyderabad and Bangalore, Under the Stars event, Round tables with corporates and civil society

Results so far: Acknowledged support by

Mayor  Eberhard van  der  Laan visits  RH  in  Delhi  in  March  2015

Azim Premji(India’s  #1  Philanthropist)  launching  RH  Walkathon  in  November  2015

Dalai  Lama  visits  RH  in  December  2013

Sania Mirza(India’s  #1  tennis  player)  visits  RH  in  December  2014

Future  Plans  2016  and  beyond

Long term strategy of scaling the Rainbow Home model in a nutshell

Long term strategy of scaling the Rainbow Home model explained

Now

• As a consequence the development of the long term strategy of RFI has been initiated and the first directions are identified. These are:

• Our common goal remains to impact as many girls as possible

• Growth will be realized by adopting a scaling out model instead of scaling up (replication by third parties).

• The RFI long term strategy will be further elaborated this year

2016

The future vision consists of 3 main elements:1. RFI will run a progressive chain of “Centers of

Excellence”/RH’s in major Indian cities to demonstrate the model: Caterpillar model for scale:

• Embrace, educate and enable partners to become (financially) independent after reaching maturity

• Herewith creating resources to expand the RH network in new cities with new partners

2. Advocacy towards local and state-level authorities and other organizations for replication of the model, aimed at getting more children off the street and greater social impact, becomes core business of RFI

3. RFI to become a resource & knowledge center for the protection of rights of children on the streets in India, providing advice, training, monitoring and quality management

• PF and RFI run a network of 29 Rainbow Homes in 8 Indian cities accommodating 2.628 girls

• Growth was realized through new Homes under own Rainbow management, which raised numerous financial and operational challenges

• Until now advocacy activities were mostly undertaken to support setting up the RH’s, resulting also in replication of the model by government and others

• In the light of the above PF undertook a revision of its long term strategy

Impacting  more  children

Long  term  vision  (under  development)

Support  RFI  to  get  the“Rainbow  Home”-­‐model  

to    a  mature  stage

Key priorities:

• Strengthening the “Older girls” strategy and approach

• Start an impact assessment, to further prove societal value of the model

• Drive (cost) efficiency of the organization, while ...

• ... maintaining the quality of the Rainbow Homes as flagship examples

• Enhance activities for dissemination of knowledge & experience

Priorities for the next 10 years for PF, to facilitate transfer of ownership to RFI and enable “systemic change”

Support  RFI  to  becomea  mature  organization

1 2 Support  RFI  to  build  its  financial  independence  and

fundraising  capability

3

Key priorities:

• Support and enable RFI to enhance its strategic management capability

• Support and enable RFI to enhance its organizational strength and financial and operational sustainability

• Support RFI to run key processes and systems independently (including reporting, quality management, evaluations and stakeholder management)

Key priorities:

• Support RFI to become self-supportive on financial management & planning

• Support RFI to reach state of sustainable local fundraising

• Strengthen ability to build and maintain lasting sponsor relations, incl. with international sponsors

• Strengthen local branding & communication to allow for further dissemination and driving of systemic change

Phase  1:  ± till  2017:Maturing

Phase  2:  ± till  2020:Self-­‐propelling

Phase  3:  ± till  2025:Scaling-­‐ready

PF  provides  continued  capacity  building  support  +  fundraising  and  sponsor  relations  in  the  Netherlands  with  gradual  reduction  2015-­2025

Organization  India  &  the  NLs

Role Rainbow Foundation India

• Policy & program development, coordination, monitoring and reporting

• Training, knowledge sharing, and capacity building amongst local partners that run a RH

• Advocacy & knowledge sharing on comprehensive residential care for street children to promote replication of the Rainbow Homes model by central and local governments in India

• Resource mobilization in India amongst government, corporates, civil society• Sponsor relations in India

Rainbow Foundation India (based in Hyderabad)Executive Leadership Team

• Anuradha Konkepudi, Executive Director and Director Resources Mobilization• V Ch S Bahadur, Director Program & Operations• Satya Pillay, Director Knowledge & Policy• Meher Leela, Director Finance

Board• Shanta Sinha, 1st (former) Chair of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights of

India, founder MV Foundation• Wilson Bezweda, renowned social activist (caste system, manual scavenging)• Krishnamurthy Vijayan, finance professional (former Managing Director IDBI, former

Executive Chairman JP Morgan Asset Management)• Anka Babu, human rights expert/social activist

Role Partnership Foundation

• Fundraising in the NLs

• Sponsor relations in the NLs• Capacity building and strengthening of Rainbow Foundation India, a.o. on:

• Finance• Branding and communication• Local fundraising• Leadership skills development

• Sparring partner for RFI: Strategy, finance, fundraising, networking

Partnership FoundationPF Board

• Loes Klappe-Linsen – Chair, former diplomat and General Manager Trade Affairs ING • Jheroen Muste – Treasurer, Partner Consulting PwC• Veronika Uhl – Secretary, owner Himmelblau• Guus Lamers – Member, Associate Structured Metals & Energy Finance ING, former NL

Embassy Delhi/India• Davinia Lamme – Member, Partner Larive International

Advisory Committee• Paul Rosenmöller• Mayor Eberhard van der Laan• Gerlach Cerfontaine• Sacha de Boer

Supervisory Board chaired by Marten van den Berg - Director General Foreign Economic Relations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs the NLS

Financials

The new strategy aims at a gradual reduction of PF’s direct contributions. At the same time, the focus is on strengthening of sustainable local fundraising

• C. 3.000 girls in c. 30 RHs

• Steady cost inflation 10%

• Increased costs for capacity building and advocacy not yet included

• Increasing funds from government and civil society (state and local level)

• Increasing funds from RFI (national level)

• Allowing for gradually reduced dependency on PF-funding

Key  assumptions

• By shifting from expansion of the network of directly RFI-run RH’s to a caterpillar model with a more or less stable number of “Centers of Excellence”, the cost-base to run the network can be better controlled

• Within RFI, spending on capacity building and advocacy/dissemination will further increase

Development  of  key  cost  drivers

• According to this plan, the ramp up of local fundraising in India results in a gradually decreasing demand for PF’s funds

• PF will continue to actively support capacity building in India as well as fundraising, sponsor relations, communications and admin support in NL on paid basis

• The regular board activities/governance affairs of PF will remain on a voluntary, non-paid basis, herewith keeping the overhead costs low

Financial  implications  for  PF

2015 2025

PF RFI  fund  raising Gov't  &  civil  society

RFI  -­ sources  &  uses  of  funds  (indicative  long  term  evolution)

2015 2025

Rainbow Homes program:Financial basis

• Partnership Foundation in NL is supported by companies and family foundations with a business background , each of them with a multi-year (rolling) commitment

• Rainbow Foundation India mobilizes resources amongst Indian corporates, HNI’s and civil society. Main Indian partners are the Bajaj Group, Wipro and Azim Premji Philanthropic Initiatives (APPI)

• The Indian government increasingly contributes to the educational costs for the girls (6-14 years old). The government makes the school buildings available to the RHs free of charge

Management and Control of Resources

• A structural planning & control process is in place both for Partnership Foundation and our partner in India (RFI).• Partnership Foundation has a clear segregation of duties

at the payment process.• The accounts of Partnership Foundation, RFI and all the

Rainbow Homes in India are yearly audited by an external accountant.

Management and Control of Resources (2)

• Partnership Foundation strives for a liquidity reserve equals the total spending of one year (both in the Netherlands and India)

• Partnership Foundation strives for a total contract value of her long-term sponsor contracts equals three times the total spending of one year (both in the Netherlands and India)