strategic plan report 2015 16...strategic plan report 2015‐16 mrs. rita everett goss associate...

Strategic Plan Report2015‐16

Mrs. Rita Everett GossAssociate Superintendent, Student Learning and Accountability

Dr. Jennifer Coyne CassataDirector, Office of Accountability

November 2, 2016

1

Presented to the Prince William County School Board - November 2, 2016

Overview

• 2015‐16 was the first year of the new 2016‐20 Strategic Plan• Presentation of data from 2015‐16 school year• Opportunity to reflect on current reality and set improvement priorities and targets

2


20/20 Vision for a World‐Class EducationGOAL 1: All students meet high standards of performance.

GOAL 2: The teaching, learning, and working environment is safe, caring, healthy, and values human diversity.

GOAL 3: Family, community and employee engagement create an environment focused upon improved student learning and work readiness.

GOAL 4: Employees are highly qualified, high performing, and diverse.

GOAL 5: The organizational system is aligned and equitable.

3


Goal 1:Student Achievement

4


Strategic Measure 1.1.1All schools will be fully accredited.

Year of Award

# of Schools

ES MS HS Total % ES MS HS

2007‐08 79 53 13 10 76 96% 0 3 02008‐09 80 53 15 10 78 98% 0 2 02009‐10 82 55 16 10 81 99% 0 1 02010‐11 82 55 17 10 82 100% 0 0 02011‐12 82 55 17 10 82 100% 0 0 02012‐13 85 57 16 11 84 99% 0 1 02013‐14 86 57 17 9 83 97% 0 1 22014‐15 86 51 15 8 74 86% 6 3 32015‐16 87 54 15 11 80 92% 4 3 02016‐17 88 56 13 10 79 90% 3 5 1

Fully Accredited* Not Fully Accredited

5


Strategic Measure 1.1.2Federal Accountability ‐ Pass Rate Comparison

Division Reading Pass Rate 14‐15

Reading Pass Rate 15‐16

Math Pass Rate 14‐15

Math Pass Rate 15‐16

STATE 79 80 79 80Prince William 81 80 80 79Alexandria 71 73 69 68Arlington 86 87 87 87Fairfax 85 85 83 83Fauquier 80 80 80 80Loudoun 87 88 85 86Manassas City 72 73 78 77Manassas Park 71 71 76 79Stafford 83 82 84 83

6


Strategic Measure 1.1.2Division Pass Rates ‐ Reading

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16PW Reading 77% 81% 80%

VA Reading 74% 79% 80%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% of ALL Students Passing Reading SOL Tests

PW Reading VA Reading

7


Strategic Measure 1.1.2Division Pass Rates ‐Mathematics

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16PW Math 77% 80% 79%

VA Math 74% 79% 80%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% of ALL Students Passing Math SOL Tests

PW Math VA Math

8


Strategic Measure 1.1.2Reading Pass Rates by Ethnic Group – PWCS and VA

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading VA Reading PW Reading VA Reading PW Reading VA Reading PW Reading VA Reading

Total Black Total Hispanic Total White Total Asian

% of each Ethnic Group Passing Reading SOL Tests

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

9


Strategic Measure 1.1.2Reading Achievement Gaps by Ethnic Group

Total Black Total Hispanic Total White Total Asian2013‐14 71% 66% 87% 86%

2014‐15 75% 73% 90% 89%

2015‐16 74% 71% 89% 89%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% of each Ethnic Group Passing Reading SOL Tests

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

10


Strategic Measure 1.1.2Mathematics Pass Rates by Ethnic Group – PWCS and VA

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Math VA Math PW Math VA Math PW Math VA Math PW Math VA Math

Total Black Total Hispanic Total White Total Asian

% of each Ethnic Group Passing Math SOL Tests

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

11


Strategic Measure 1.1.2Mathematics Achievement Gaps by Ethnic Group

Total Black Total Hispanic Total White Total Asian2013‐14 69% 69% 85% 89%

2014‐15 73% 74% 87% 91%

2015‐16 71% 71% 88% 91%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% of each Ethnic Group Passing Math SOL Tests

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

12


Strategic Measure 1.1.2Reading Pass Rates by Student Group – PWCS and VA

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading VA Reading PW Reading VA Reading PW Reading VA Reading

Total EconDis Total LEP Total SWD

% of each Student Group Passing Reading SOL Tests

2013‐14

2014‐15

2015‐16

Key: SWD = Students with Disabilities, LEP = Limted English Proficient, EconDis = Economonically Disadvantaged

13


Strategic Measure 1.1.2Reading Achievement Gaps by Student Group

64% 85% 21% 54% 83% 29% 49% 81% 32%70% 88% 18% 62% 86% 24% 51% 85% 34%69% 88% 19% 61% 85% 24% 49% 84% 35%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

EconDis Not EconDis Gap LEP Non LEP Gap SWD Non SWD Gap

% Passing Reading SOL Tests

by each Student Group

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

14


Strategic Measure 1.1.2Mathematics Pass Rates by Student Group – PWCS and VA

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Math VA Math PW Math VA Math PW Math VA Math

Total EconDis Total LEP Total SWD

% of each Student Group Passing Math SOL Tests

2013‐14

2014‐15

2015‐16

Key: SWD = Students with Disabilities, LEP = Limted English Proficient, EconDis = Economonically Disadvantaged

15


Strategic Measure 1.1.2Mathematics Achievement Gaps by Student Group

66% 84% 18% 63% 80% 17% 47% 80% 33%71% 86% 15% 67% 83% 16% 49% 84% 35%69% 86% 17% 65% 83% 18% 48% 83% 35%0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

EconDis Not EconDis Gap LEP Non LEP Gap SWD Non SWD Gap

% Passing Math SOL Tests

by each Student Group

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

16


Strategic Measure 1.1.3Pass Advanced Rates – PWCS and VA

17

Subject Area 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

PWCS VA PWCS VA PWCS VA

Reading 16 16 17 18 18 18

Mathematics 18 16 19 18 17 18

Science 15 15 15 14 15 16

Social Studies 31 29 27 25 26 26


Strategic Measure 1.1.4Graduates Receiving Qualifying Scores on AP/IB/Cambridge

33% 33% 35%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

Percent of Graduates Earning Qualifying Score

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

18


Strategic Measure 1.1.5SAT and ACT Results

2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16National 1498 1498 1497 1490 1484

Virginia 1517 1528 1530 1533 1535

PWCS 1490 1498 1511 1507 1507

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

SAT Results ‐Mean Scores

National Virginia PWCS

2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16National 21 21 21 21 21

Virginia 22 23 23 23 23

PWCS 22 22 22 23 23

048

12162024283236

ACT Results ‐Mean Scores

National Virginia PWCS

19


Strategic Measure 1.1.6Average Daily Attendance

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

Average Daily Attendance Rates

% of Attendance Target

20


Strategic Measure 1.1.7On‐Time Graduation Rate

21

2016 On‐Time Graduation Rate (Four Year)

All Black Hispanic White Asian Econ. Disadv.

English Learners

Students with

DisabilitiesSTATE 91.3% 88.3% 82.8% 93.9% 96.6% 87.5% 67.5% 87.8%

Prince William 91.8% 91.8% 86.2% 95.0% 97.1% 88.2% 77.3% 90.7%

Alexandria 82.1% 84.6% 70.5% 92.8% 100.0% 77.5% 67.7% 85.9%

Arlington 91.1% 94.4% 77.1% 99.1% 96.2% 94.2% 56.1% 93.6%

Fairfax 92.3% 93.2% 77.1% 97.3% 96.9% 87.0% 62.2% 89.2%

Fauquier 95.1% 86.9% 89.2% 96.6% TS 87.8% 70.0% 95.6%

Loudoun 95.9% 96.4% 86.1% 98.0% 98.4% 89.3% 69.4% 94.7%

Manassas 79.8% 80.9% 71.4% 92.7% 91.7% 81.5% 51.9% 85.5%

Manassas Park 86.3% 85.7% 80.5% 91.7% 100.0% 81.7% 54.1% 95.8%

Stafford 92.9% 91.9% 87.2% 94.4% 95.5% 85.6% 74.6% 86.5%

Note: TS = Too Small


Strategic Measure 1.1.8Dual Enrollment

22

32.09% 31.83% 33.69%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Division

% of Graduates Receiving Dual Enrollment Credit OR

Qualifying Score on Advanced Exams Recognized by NVCC

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

4.69% 5.14%6.68%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Division

% of Graduates Receiving Dual Enrollment Credit

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16


Strategic Measure 1.1.9College Readiness

• PWCS is identifying ways to measure college readiness as measured by the assessments used as placement tests by the Virginia Community College System

• Due to changes in the PSAT and SAT assessments, these calculations will be put in place beginning in 2016‐17

• The College Board also publishes a college readiness rate, based on a benchmark score of 1550 on the SAT

• 42.9% of graduating seniors in PWCS met this benchmark in 2016

23


Strategic Measure 1.1.10Advanced Studies Diplomas

52%

5%

22%

36%

41% 39%

61%

52%

7%

13%

36%40% 39%

65%

52%

7%

12%

35%

43%

38%

63%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

All SWD LEP EconDis Black Hispanic White

Percent of Graduates Earning Advanced Diplomas

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

24


Strategic Measure 1.2.1Program Participation

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

EconDis Minority SpEd LEP EconDis Minority SpEd LEP

ES Gifted MS Gifted

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

25


Strategic Measure 1.2.1Program Participation

EconDis Minority SpEd LEP EconDis Minority SpEd LEP EconDis Minority SpEd LEPHS Gifted: HS AP, IB, AICE Course: HS CTE Course:

2013‐14 7% 12% 3% 1% 16% 24% 3% 7% 63% 59% 63% 60%

2014‐15 8% 12% 3% 1% 17% 24% 3% 5% 63% 60% 63% 61%

2015‐16 8% 13% 3% 1% 17% 24% 3% 5% 64% 62% 65% 65%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

26


Strategic Measure 1.2.2Representation in Special Education

27

Table shows % of each student group identified for special education

Total EconDis LEP Asian Black Hispanic White2013‐14 9% 11% 9% 4% 12% 9% 9%

2014‐15 9% 11% 10% 4% 12% 9% 9%

2015‐16 10% 11% 11% 5% 13% 9% 10%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

% of Students Identified for Special Education

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16


Strategic Measures 1.2.3 and 1.2.4Equitable Access to Fine and Performing Arts/Application of Technology

• 96 percent of parents indicated satisfaction with the elementary strings program in spring 2016

• PWCS continues to focus on the scheduling of arts classes at all levels• Students are provided with opportunities to apply technology effectively to gain knowledge, develop skills, and create and disseminate products that reflect their understanding

28


Goal 2:Climate

29


Strategic Measures 2.1.1 and 2.1.2Cultural Responsiveness and Collaboration

• Employees complete professional development in culturally competent and non‐discriminatory practices within two years of employment

• All staff members actively participate in collaborative teamwork designed to improve professional practice and student learning and promote the culture of a professional learning community

30


Strategic Measure 2.2.1Discipline Referrals

31

Discipline Referrals: % of each student group with discipline referrals

Total EconDis LEP SpEd Asian Black Hispanic White2013‐14 13% 17% 11% 21% 7% 21% 14% 10%

2014‐15 13% 16% 11% 22% 6% 20% 14% 9%

2015‐16 13% 16% 11% 22% 6% 21% 13% 9%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

% of Students with Discipline Referrals

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16


Strategic Measure 2.2.2Chronic Absenteeism

25%28%

26%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

Percent of Students Who Were Chronically Absent

32

Chronically Absent = Students absent 10 or more days in a given school year


Strategic Measure 2.2.3Student Wellness

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Abdominals Aerobic Upper Body Flexibility

PWCS Wellness Scores by Category

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

PWCS and VA Wellness Scores by Gender and Grade

33

VA PW VA PW VA PW VA PW2014‐15 2014‐15 2014‐15 2014‐15 2015‐16 2015‐16 2015‐16 2015‐16

Grade 5 81% 93% 81% 92% 82% 93% 82% 92%

Grade 8 87% 96% 86% 95% 87% 95% 87% 93%

Grade 10 89% 97% 88% 98% 89% 97% 89% 97%

Grade 5 71% 81% 84% 95% 72% 81% 84% 95%

Grade 8 67% 78% 70% 86% 67% 75% 71% 84%

Grade 10 58% 72% 60% 78% 59% 72% 61% 76%

Girls

Abdominal

Aerobic

Grade

Boys Girls Boys


Strategic Measure 2.2.4 and 2.2.5Community Service and Wellness Committees

• All schools provide multiple opportunities for students to participate in school or community service

• All schools maintain Wellness Committees that are responsible for implementing the Wellness regulation

34


Strategic Objective 2.3Enhancing Facilities and Equipment

• Compliance Audits• Energy Management• Instructional Equipment Refresh Cycles• Information Technology Refresh Cycles

35


Goal 3:Family, Community, and Employee

Engagement

36


Strategic Measures 3.1.1 and 3.1.2Community Partnerships and School Advisory Councils

• All schools maintain school‐home and school‐community partnerships

• Over the past 11 years, all new principals have been trained in how to run School Advisory Councils

• Beginning in January 2017, all schools will receive School Advisory Council training

37


Strategic Measure 3.2.1Stakeholder Survey Data – Overall Satisfaction

38


Goal 4:Qualified Work Force

39


Strategic Measure 4.1.1Highly Qualified Teachers

98% 97% 96%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

Percent of Teachers Certified/Endorsed

40


Strategic Measure 4.1.2National Board Certified Teachers

0

200

400

600

800

1000

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

Ratio of Students Per NBCT (Target of 500:1)

NBCT Target

41


Strategic Objective 4.2Professional Growth

• All employees complete and implement individualized professional development plans

• All first‐year teachers are supported by a mentoring program for their first three years

• All employees are evaluated through a standards‐based performance evaluation system

• All teachers participate as part of their school’s professional learning communities and collaborative learning teams

42


Strategic Measures 4.3.1 and 4.4.1Equal Opportunity and Competitive Salaries

• PWCS uses non‐preferential programs and strategies to provide equal opportunity and promote workforce diversity

• PWCS strives to have competitive salary and benefits packages• The School Board approved step increase for all employees for FY2017

43


Strategic Measure 4.4.2Teacher Turnover

8% 9% 10%

92% 91% 90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16

Teacher Turnover and Retention Percentages

% Turnover % Retention Will Not Exceed

44


Goal 5:Organizational Alignment

45


Strategic Objective 5.1Aligned Planning

• School and department plans are aligned with the goals and objectives of the Strategic Plan and with school needs

• The School Division strives to be responsive in addressing stakeholder questions and concerns

• Internal and external performance reviews are conducted on a regular schedule

46


Strategic Objective 5.2Equitable Use of Funds

• Class size reduction (5.2.1)• FY2017 budget includes new teachers and support staff to reduce class sizes

• Funding ratios are reviewed to ensure current needs are met within budgetary constraints (5.2.3)

• Internal Audits are conducted on a regular basis (5.2.4)

Funding for Renovations/Renewals will Average 3% of Replacement Value (5.2.2)

Year % ValueFY 2014 3.1%FY 2015 3.4%FY 2016 2.2%FY 2017 3.4%FY 2018 2.2%FY 2019 3.4%FY 2020 2.2%FY 2021 3.4%FY 2022 2.2%FY 2023 3.4%

47


Strategic Objective 5.3Fiscal Integrity

• The School Division received an unqualified opinion on the Appropriated Fund Audit for FY2015

• The School Division maintained a positive end‐of‐year fund balance for FY2016

48


Strategic Plan Report2015‐16

Mrs. Rita Everett GossAssociate Superintendent, Student Learning and Accountability

Dr. Jennifer Coyne CassataDirector, Office of Accountability

November 2, 2016

49


strategic plan report 2015 16...strategic plan report 2015‐16 mrs. rita everett goss associate...

Documents