structural evolution and petroleum systems of the murchison basin

14
Structural Evolution and Petroleum Systems of the Murchison Basin J. Mac Beggs GeoSphere Ltd, Lower Hutt Francesca C. Ghisetti TerraGeologica, Christchurch GSNZ Annual Meeting Wellington, Nov. 23-26, 2008

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Structural Evolution and Petroleum Systems of the Murchison Basin

J. Mac BeggsGeoSphere Ltd, Lower Hutt

Francesca C. GhisettiTerraGeologica, Christchurch

GSNZ Annual Meeting

Wellington, Nov. 23-26, 2008

• Inner margin ofCompressionalInversion Orogen

• Footwall of the Alpine Fault in the bend region

• Overlies major basementdiscontinuities (TerraneBoundaries)

• Bounded by sets of largecrustal faults

• Heat flow anomaly (up to 108 mW/m2

(Townend, 1999)

Upwelling of slab-derived fluids inferred from MT (Wannamaker et al., 2007)

BULLERTAKAKA

M. BATHOLITH

MURCHISON BASIN

• Flexural foredeep during L. Oligocene through M. Miocene (30-10 Ma)

• Persistent subsidence from the

extensional through the early

compressional stages

Extensional basin (hosting terrestrialcoal measures) during mid-late Eocenerifting (45-35 Ma) (tip of N-migratingEmerald Basin)

*

*

~ 20 Ma

MB

Large sediment accommodation space with > 7.5 km of infilling Tertiary sediments

Beggs, Ghisetti

and Tulloch, 2008

Emerald B.

E. Miocene Ranges

• Strong vertical mobility

• Rapid uplift (post 10 Ma) with removal of > 3.5 km of Eocene and younger section (Gibson et al., 1996)

Ghisetti and Sibson (2006)

BASE TO THE OLIGOCENE SEQUENCE

> 40% post L. Miocene shortening

• Crustal seismicity

• Large historical earthquakes

• Reverse NNE-SSW faults

HYDROCARBON SYSTEM

Evidence for generation andmovement of hydrocarbon fluids

• Problem of location and quality of seismic lines

• Unsuitable location of wells

SEEPS

Murchison-1 1927

Blackwater-1 1968

Bounty-1 1970

Matiri-1 1985

Location, extent, and maturation of source rocks

Location, geometry, size and depth of stratigraphic/structural traps

Survival of hydrocarbon fluids in the trap-seal assemblage

CONTRIBUTION OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR DEFINITION OF SUBSURFACE STRUCTURE

KEY ISSUES FOR EXPLORATION

ManglesGeological Sheet1984

Lihou 1993

East

East

West

West Longford Syn.

Longford Syn.

SEISMIC LINE MB87-01 (REPROCESSED)

Longitudinal Transverse

LONGFORD SYNCLINE

• Inclined non-cylindrical folds with opposite vergence

• Open synclinestight, disrupted anticlines 37-34.3 Ma

34.3-21.7 Ma

21.7-15.9 Ma

15.9-15 Ma

• Disharmonic style controlled by competence contrasts in the sedimentary sequence and byinherited structures

• Forced folds

• High-angle inherited and reactivated normal faults

• Low-angle cross-cutting thrust faults accomodatingsignificant amounts of shortening

1. Buckling and detachment (latest Oligocene-Early Miocene)

2. Fold growth and amplification associated with compressionalinversion (Middle Miocene)

3. Crosscutting by low-angle thrusts (footwall shortcuts of AF) since 10 Ma

Modified from Ghisetti and Sibson (2006)

• Difficult downdip projection of surface and near-surface data

• Correct definition of structural style is a key for exploration and well location

• Low-angle crosscutting thrust faults seal stratigraphic traps and early structural traps in the footwall

• 3D migration pathways of fluids are likely to be structurally controlled

IMPLICATIONS FOR HYDROCARBON EXPLORATION