study of fpccd vertex detector 12 jul. 2005 @8 th acfa ws y. sugimoto kek

15
Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Upload: ashlie-berry

Post on 28-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector

12 Jul. 2005

@8th ACFA WS

Y. Sugimoto

KEK

Page 2: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

FPCCD Vertex Detector Accumulate hit signals for one train and read out between trains

  (Other options read out 20 times per train) Fine pixel of ~5m (x20 more pixels than “standard” pixels) to ke

ep low pixel occupancy Fully depleted epitaxial layer to minimize the number of hit pixels

due to charge spread by diffusion Two layers in proximity make a doublet (super layer) to minimize

the wrong-tracking probability due to multiple scattering Tracking capability with single layer using cluster shape can help

background rejection Three doublets (6 CCD layers) make the detector Operation at low temperature to keep dark current negligible (r.o.

cycle=200ms)

Page 3: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Tracking efficiency

Large number of background hits may cause tracking inefficiency: mis-identification of signal hit with background hit

002

0 ,2 dRRpmis : Background hit density0 : Multiple scattering angle

For a normal incident track, the probabilityof mis-identification of hit is given by;

Angular and momentum dependence; 42 sin ppmis

Page 4: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Tracking efficiency

cos

p mis d=10mm, =40/mm2

d=2mm, =40/mm2

d=10mm, =2/mm2

Mis-identification Probability (p=1 GeV/c,tSi=50m)

Expected hit density 40/mm2/train (TESLA) 20/mm2/train (Nominal) 15/mm2/train (LowQ)

at R=20 mm, B=3 T

Page 5: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Cluster shape

Effective background rejection will be possible by requiring angles of hit clusters in two layers of a doublet and the angle of the line connecting the two hits to be consistent with the extrapolated track.

(tracking capability with single layer!)

Standard pixel FPCCD

Page 6: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Baseline design

Page 7: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Advantages of FPCCD Free from beam-induced RF noise x~1.4m even with digital readout Simple structure : advantageous for large size Active circuit on one edge : easy to control

temperature Readout speed: 15MHz is enough

(128(V)x20000(H)/200ms=12.8MHz) (CPCCD:>50MHz)

CCD

MAPS/FAPS/ISIS

Page 8: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Impact parameter resolution Full simulation study by Jupiter Parameters:

Old standard option: R=24, 36, 48, 60 mm t = 330 m/layer = 4 m

FPCCD option: R=20, 22, 39, 41, 58, 60 mm t = 80 m/layer = 2 m

Be beam pipe (common): R=18 mm t = 500 m

Page 9: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Impact parameter resolution

p=1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 GeV/c

T. Nagamine

Page 10: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Lorentz angle

Lorentz angle in depleted-layer tan=nB

n: electron mobility Carrier velocity saturates at hig

h E field: n =0.07 m2/Vs @T=300

K, E=1x104V/cm n =0.045 m2/Vs @T=300

K, E=2x104V/cm Small angle can be cancelled b

y tilting the wafer May not be a serious problem

Number of hit pixels does not increase so much

B=3T B=5T

E=1x104V/cm =12deg =19deg

E=2x104V/cm =7.7deg =13deg

Page 11: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Lorentz angle

Calculation of E-field in epi-layer Tools

FEMLAB (COMSOL in Japan) 3.1 Solve Poisson equation by finite element analysis (FEA)

Parameters Material is assumed fully depleted (No free charge) n-layer: ND=1x1016/cm3=1.6x103 C/m3

Epi-layer: NA=1x1013/cm3=-1.6 C/m3

VG=4 V tSiO2=100 nm tn=1 m tepi=15 m

Page 12: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Lorentz angle

Result of E-field calculation

Page 13: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Lorentz angle Result of E-field calculation – Potential

Page 14: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Lorentz angle

Result of E-field calculation – Summary Almost constant E-field of ~104V/cm in epi-layer can be ac

hieved E-field in epi-layer depends on gate voltage

Higher (positive) gate voltage gives higher E-field Positive gate voltage should be applied during train crossin

g in order to get saturated carrier velocity and less Lorentz angle (Inverted (MPP) mode can be maintained for ~1ms)

The Lorentz angle of 12 degrees is expected at B=3T

Page 15: Study of FPCCD Vertex Detector 12 Jul. 2005 @8 th ACFA WS Y. Sugimoto KEK

Summary and outlook We propose FPCCD option for the ILC Vertex Detector

Fully depleted CCD with 5m-square fine pixel size Accumulate 2820 BX and readout between trains Two layers make a doublet (super layer) to pick up signal h

its out of background hits If the thickness of the wafers is less than 80 m, the impact para

meter resolution better than b = 5 10/(psin3/2) m can be achieved with Rin=20 mm and B=3T

Electric field in the epitaxial layer has been calculated. From the results, the Lorentz angle of ~12 degrees at B=3T is expected

Tracking efficiency under beam background is the most critical issue for FPCCD. Simulation study is urgent.