suspension optimization ppt

24
OPTIMIZATION OF MACPHERSON SUSPENSION SYSTEM Under the guidance of Prof. K. Muruganandham, Kumaraguru college of technology Submitted by, Gautam Makeshbabu(0810103012) Kumar.P (0810103023)

Upload: gautam-makeshbabu

Post on 13-Jul-2015

290 views

Category:

Automotive


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Suspension optimization ppt

OPTIMIZATION OF MACPHERSON SUSPENSION

SYSTEM

Under the guidance of

Prof. K. Muruganandham,

Kumaraguru college of technology

Submitted by,

Gautam Makeshbabu(0810103012)

Kumar.P (0810103023)

Page 2: Suspension optimization ppt

Objective

• Analyze the reasons for frequent failures in the TATA INDICA’s front wheel suspension system.

• To optimize the existing spring. To increase the stiffness and load carrying capacity of the spring.

• To decrease the shear stress acting on the spring.

Page 3: Suspension optimization ppt

Problem Analysis

Design Method

Usage Environment

Failure

Shape of spring

Coil diameter

Number of turns

Faulty manufacture

Unreasonable load

Poor maintenance

Rugged road conditions

Page 4: Suspension optimization ppt

Analysis of Existing spring

• The old spring is tested in Si’Tarc testing center and the stiffness value is found to be

• K=19.19 N/mm• Then the CATIA model is made, which is

imported in ANSYS and its analyzed for value of deflection and Stress.

• Using the formulae the value of deflection and stress values are found out.

Page 5: Suspension optimization ppt

CalculationStiffness calculation

K= 19.11 N/mm

Shear stress calculation:

Page 6: Suspension optimization ppt

C=10.08

k = 1.14

Shear stress T= 1103.84 N/mm2

Page 7: Suspension optimization ppt

Design of Experiments

• The parameter that can be changed are • Coil diameter• Shape of spring• Mean diameter and number of turns.

Factors High Low

Shape of Spring Helical Conical

Number of turns 7 6

Coil Diameter(mm) 12.7 12

Page 8: Suspension optimization ppt

• We have increased the coil diameter from 12 mm to 12.7 mm which is SWG 7/0.

• We also decreased the number of turns from 7 to 6.

• The spring is made conical and its maximum diameter of 160 mm and minimum diameter of 130 mm.

• The shear stress for the model is calculated and is checked with the maximum value.

Page 9: Suspension optimization ppt

Calculation

Page 10: Suspension optimization ppt
Page 11: Suspension optimization ppt

Comparison of resultsData Existing spring New spring

Spring type Helical Conical

Coil diamter 12 mm 12.7 mm

Mean diameter 131 mm -

Maximum dia and Minimum diameter 160 &130 mm

Number of turns 7 6

Stiffness 19.19 N/mm* 21.1 N/mm*

Maximum load carrying capacity 500 kgs* 584 kgs*

Maximum shear Stress 1103 N/mm2 1040 N/mm2

* - Data’s from Si’Tarc testing center.

Page 12: Suspension optimization ppt

Data

Page 13: Suspension optimization ppt

Results of existing spring

Page 14: Suspension optimization ppt
Page 15: Suspension optimization ppt

Deformation in ansys

Page 16: Suspension optimization ppt

Shear stress

Page 17: Suspension optimization ppt

Equivalent stress

Page 18: Suspension optimization ppt

Results for new spring

Page 19: Suspension optimization ppt
Page 20: Suspension optimization ppt

Deflection

Page 21: Suspension optimization ppt

Equivalent stress

Page 22: Suspension optimization ppt

Shear stress

Page 23: Suspension optimization ppt

Conclusion

• The optimized design is made by changing major parameters of existing spring.

• The new spring is manufactured and is tested in Si’Tarc lab.

• The stiffness is increased by 9.99% thereby the load carrying capacity is increased by 16%.

• The shear stress is decreased by 5.71%

Page 24: Suspension optimization ppt

Thank you