suspicious infant death

25
Suspicious Infant Death A Proposed

Upload: misty

Post on 09-Feb-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Suspicious Infant Death. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Suspicious Infant Death

Suspicious Infant Death

A Proposed

National Data Set

Michael Durfee MD

APHA 2004

Page 2: Suspicious Infant Death

Based on Data Match X3+and… “LA Model”

• Data Match X3+– 1 FBI UCR SHR (Cop Homicide)– 2 Vital Statistics (Coroner Homicide)– 3 Child Abuse Central Index (CPS)– + Child Death Review Team

• LA Model – infants only (from above)

Page 3: Suspicious Infant Death

State C hi l d D e athR e po r ts C as e s to

l o c al t e am s

FB I - UC R -S HRV I TA L

S TA TI S TI C S

C HILD A B US EC EN TR A L IN D EX

LO C A L A G E N C IE S

L O C AL TE AM SR E C O N C IL E /C O R R E C T

C ASE D ATA

Page 4: Suspicious Infant Death

Matching Data Sets Connect…`

• Professions – – Justice– Health– CPS

• More powerful data• State/local agencies

Page 5: Suspicious Infant Death

Case Example of Data MatchResolves the “Puzzle”

Ten week old falls from couch to floor Taken to closest hospital in coma

(in a neighboring state)And… dies

Page 6: Suspicious Infant Death

FBI UCR SHR - Dad suspect(Local Police)

Coroner- Undetermined(neighboring state)

Child Abuse Central Index, No Report (Local CPS)

Suspicious Death(local Child Death Review Team)

Page 7: Suspicious Infant Death

Team finds CoronerIn neighboring stateTell law enforcement

`

Page 8: Suspicious Infant Death

Dad convicted but no one reports to social servicesThree siblings left in home

Page 9: Suspicious Infant Death

Matching data sets identifies missing recordsSiblings found and served

Page 10: Suspicious Infant Death

State C hi l d D e athR e po r ts C ase s to

l o c al t e am s

FB I - UC R -S H RV I TA L

S TA TI S TI C S

C HILD A B US EC EN TR A L IN D EX

LO C A L A G E N C IE S

L O C AL TE AM SR E C O N C IL E /C O R R E C T

C ASE D ATA

C as e e nte r e d i nto C AC I

Si bl i ng s Se r ve d

Page 11: Suspicious Infant Death

Why Only Infant Cases

• Manageable with present resources– <12 cases/year for most states – existing data (X3)– Avoid Extra Codes

• Infant homicides are significant – 95%+ by caretaker – 40% of all caretaker homicide– Problem cases for adult oriented systems

Page 12: Suspicious Infant Death

Studies - Single Data Sets

Page 13: Suspicious Infant Death

Infant Homicide Rate / 100,000 births 1999-2001 (States over 50,000 births)

0.05.0

10.015.020.0

MIS

SO

UR

I

IND

IAN

A

ILLI

NO

IS

VIR

GIN

IA

MIC

HIG

AN

WIS

CO

NS

I

KE

NTU

CK

NO

RTH

TEX

AS

NE

W Y

OR

K

NE

W

MIN

NE

SO

T

WA

SH

ING

T

States

State Infant Homicide Rates Vary up to 400%

Page 14: Suspicious Infant Death

State Infant Homicide RatesCorrelate with…

• Infant mortality rates– Pearson r = 0.79 with p <0.0001

• Quality of investigation– Missouri has systematic investigation– LA County changed cases to homicide

Page 15: Suspicious Infant Death

Infant Rates Constant/Time(Differ from older homicide)

Child Homicide Crude Rate by Age by YearUS Vital Stats WISQARS 1990 - 2001

Michael Durfee MD [email protected] 11/1/03

0

5

10

15

20

25

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

YEAR

<1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Age in Years

17 y/o

16 y/o

15 y/o

<1 y/o

14 y/o

1 y/oo

3 y/o4-12 y/o

AB C

A <1 surpass 15 y/o 1996

B <1 surpass 16 y/o 1998

C <1 "Match/Parallel" 17 y/o 2000-2001

Rate/100,000 births

DF

E

D 1 y/o surpass 14 y/o 1996

E 1 y/o surpass 15 y/o 2001

F 2 y/o surpass 14 y/o 2000

G*

G 3 y/o match 14 y/o 2001

ICD9 1990-1998 ICD10 1999-2001

`

H*

H 4 y/o surpass 13 y/o 2001

13 y/o

Page 16: Suspicious Infant Death

Homicide by Age/Gender(Younger victim about equal)

CHILD HOMICIDE RATE, GENDER/ AGEUNITED STATES 2000Michael Durfee MD, 11/ 25/ 02

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17AGE (YEARS)

RA

TE

Males females

Page 17: Suspicious Infant Death

Homicide /Rate /Age /Race(Rates for all ages, not equal)

CHILD HOMICIDE RATE/ RACE/ AGE US 2000

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17AGE

RA

TE

WHITE BLACK

Page 18: Suspicious Infant Death

Match Infant Data X3(ican-ncfr.org)

Page 19: Suspicious Infant Death

Texas - Suspicious Infant Death Rate/Year (X3)

(CPS cases higher – expected)Texas Suspicious Infant Death

0

20

40

60

80

Year

Dea

ths

UCR 21 24 18 22 13 17 24 7 24 17 21

VS 20 40 25 26 15 22 20 22 36 26 25 34

CACI 42 35 47 41 59 60 61 75

199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 200 200

Page 20: Suspicious Infant Death

California Infant Homicide Rate/Year

(CPS low - missed data entries)California Suspicious Infant Death

0

20

40

60

80

Year

Dea

ths

SHR 46 56 58 33 49 53 46 39 37 29 30

VS 40 50 41 37 52 41 35 36 36 30 26 24

CACI 15 15

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Page 21: Suspicious Infant Death

DOJ HomicideN=243

VS Injury DeathsN=1165

VS HomicideN=214

VS CANN=90

DOJ CANN=196

DOJ CACIN=128

N=56

Child Abuse and Neglect Fatalities: Children < 6 Years, California 1992-3

Page 22: Suspicious Infant Death

LA MODELCASE DATA MATCH

Page 23: Suspicious Infant Death

LA Model Sample Case

• 3 month male father threw against wall• “Manner” of death X3

– Homicide (UCR and VS) no record CPS• Action

– Father convicted– Case reported to CACI – CPS records found in two counties

• Counties meet to share data• Siblings located, with mom, voluntary services

Page 24: Suspicious Infant Death

National Infant Data X3+

• National data with common language– Teams could compare data and cases

(e.g., State infant homicide rates)– Connect cases across state/county lines

• Support more complex data systems– CDC National Violent Death

Child death indices

Page 25: Suspicious Infant Death

Resources

• Web Site - ican-ncfr.org– Team Reports– “51 State” Comparison– Infant Data x3 / State– LA Model – 2005

• APHA Caucus on Family Violence– [email protected]