symptom clusters and well-being during the menopausal transition and early postmenopause
DESCRIPTION
Symptom Clusters and Well-being during the Menopausal Transition and Early Postmenopause. Lori Cray, PhD, RN Nancy Fugate Woods, PhD, RN, FAAN Ellen Sullivan Mitchell , PhD Jerald R. Herting , PhD. Funding Support. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Lori Cray, PhD, RNNancy Fugate Woods, PhD, RN, FAAN
Ellen Sullivan Mitchell, PhDJerald R. Herting, PhD
SYMPTOM CLUSTERS AND WELL-BEING DURING THE MENOPAUSAL
TRANSITION AND EARLY POSTMENOPAUSE
Funding SupportNINR 1R21NR012218-01 Menopause
Symptom Clusters: Refocusing Therapeutics
NINR R01-NR 04141 Menopausal Transition: Biobehavioral Dimensions
NINR P30 NR 04001, P50-NR02323 – Center for Women’s Health and Gender Research
BackgroundSeattle Midlife
Women’s Health Study (SMWHS) participants report multiple symptoms during the menopausal transition
hot flashessleep disturbancepainmood changescognitive difficulties
Previous analyses of SMWHS data revealed 4 clusters of symptoms women experienced during the late menopausal transition stage
Current analyses expand our research across the menopausal transition stages and early postmenopause
Hypothesized Model
PurposesDetermine effects
of socio-behavioral risk factors on latent class membershipSmokingStressAgeEducationBMI
Determine overall effect of latent class membership on positive well-being
Sample & DesignSample consisted of women from the
SMWHS who: provided diary data on at least one occasion
between 1990 and 2010 were in the late reproductive stage, the early
or late menopausal transition stages or early postmenopause
yielded 6857 observations
Measures - Symptoms3-day health diary
Measures – Socio-behavioral Risk FactorsStress
Education
Age
Smoking status
Body mass index (BMI)
“How stressful was your day?” Scale: 0 (not at all) to 6 (extremely) Continuous variable assessed as number of years of education Continuous variable entered in years Defined by a yes/no response on annual health questionnaireCalculated according to the formula kg/m2 based on self reported height and weight collected annually in the health questionnaire
Measures –Perceived Well-being
Healthy
Rested
Happy
Interest
“How healthy did you feel today?”
“How rested did you feel today?”
“How happy did you feel today?”
“How much interest did you have today in work, school, home, friends, hobbies?”
Constructed from 4 items from 3-day health diaryRated 0 (not at all) to 6(extremely)
Multilevel LatentClass Analysis(MLCA)
Data AnalysisC
Sleep PainHotFlash Mood Cog-
nitiveTensio
n
Latent class variable(i.e. symptom severity profile)
Latent class indicators (i.e. symptom clusters)
• Diff. getting to sleep• Night time awakening• Early AM awakening
• Backache• Joint ache• Headache
• Depressed• Mood changes• Crying• Irritable
• Problem concentrating• Forgetful• Irritable
• Panic• Nervous• Tension
Data Analysis
Model No of free parameters
BIC BLRT (p) Entropy
1 class 12 72669.4 NA NA 2 class 19 62670.9 .000 .924 3 class 32 57879.0 .000 .944 4 class 33 56368.3 .000 .936 5 class 40 54877.2 .000 .941 6 class 47 53360 .9 .000 .948
Selection of best fitting model (optimal # of latent classes)
Goodness-of-fit measures:• Bayesian information criterion (BIC)• Bootstrap likelihood ratio test (BLRT)
Logical interpretation of the resulting classes
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
HotflashSleepPainMoodCognitveTense
Results
12% 16% 72%
High HF Low HF/mod other sx’s All Low
ResultsEffects of Socio-behavioral Risk Factors on Latent Class Membership
Class 1 (n=839) Class 2 (n=1070)
High HF Low HF/mod
other sx’sb (SE) Wald(1) OR b (SE) Wald(1) OR
Model
Intercept 13.931 2.281 -6.108 NA -0.342 1.668 -0.205 NA
Stress 0.285 0.079 3.595* 1.33 0.287 0.072 3.966* 1.333
Smoking -1.060 0.697 -1.521 0.346 -0.673 0.387 -1.74 0.51
Age 0.247 0.031 7.906* 1.281 0.022 0.024 0.92 1.023
Education -0.637 0.756 -0.842 0.529 -1.805 0.695 -2.598† 0.164
BMI 0.142 0.277 0.512 1.152 -0.013 0.270 -0.047 0.987
Low symptomatic group (class 3) was used as the referent (n=4948)
*p < .001; †p<.01
Results
Effects of Latent Class Membership on Perceived Well-being
Class 1 High HF
(n=839)
Class 2 Low HF/mod
other sx’s(n=1070)
b (SE) Wald(1) p b (SE) Wald(1) p
Poswb -0.231 0.111 -2.081 .037 -0.366 0.113 -3.233 .001
Low symptomatic group (class 3) was used as the referent (n=4948)
ConclusionFirst effort to examine latent classes or clusters
of symptoms over the prolonged period from late reproductive stage through early postmenopause
Women experience multiple symptomsSymptoms tend to cluster togetherWe identified 3 classes of symptom episodes
Differed by symptom severity of individual symptom clusters
Age, education, stress play significant role in class membership
Perceived well-being likely to be significantly lower for women with higher symptomatology regardless of HF severity
Next Steps
SC1=high HF SC2=lowHF, mod.other sx’sSC3=low severity
Thank you