system level accountability measures october 18, 2004
DESCRIPTION
System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004. ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATOR: ACCESS TO PROGRAMS & COURSES. Measure 1D: Student Retention Rates Core Measures Measure 1D1 – Percent Graduated Measure 1D2 – Percent Retained Measure 1D3 – Percent Transferred Measure 1D4 – Success Rate - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator.
System Level Accountability Measures
October 18, 2004
![Page 2: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Slide 2
ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATOR:ACCESS TO PROGRAMS & COURSES
• Measure 1D: Student Retention Rates
– Core Measures
• Measure 1D1 – Percent Graduated
• Measure 1D2 – Percent Retained
• Measure 1D3 – Percent Transferred
• Measure 1D4 – Success Rate
– Contextual Measures
• Graduation and Transfer-Out Rates for similar institutions
• Retention rates will be available in the future
![Page 3: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Slide 3
MEASURE 1D: DATA SOURCES & REPORTING LEVELS
• Three data sources– ISRS Student Subsystem
– National Student Clearinghouse
– Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
• Reporting Levels– System level
– Institution Type
– Admission status
– Full-Time & Part-Time
– Race-Ethnicity
– Low Income
![Page 4: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Slide 4
MEASURE 1D: DEFINITIONS
• Cohort: Entering students in a specified term.
• Graduated: The cumulative percentage of students in the cohort that have graduated by the end of the specified term.
• Retained: The percentage of students in the cohort that have not graduated and are enrolled during the specified term.
![Page 5: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Slide 5
MEASURE 1D: DEFINITIONS
• Transferred: The cumulative percentage of students in the cohort that have not graduated and are not enrolled but have enrolled at another U.S. institution.
• Success: The cumulative percentage of students in the cohort that have graduated or transferred plus the percent enrolled during a specific term.
![Page 6: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Slide 6
FALL ENTERING STUDENT COHORTS
57,55763,841 64,716 67,549 68,202 69,451
57,413
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Measure 1D Cohort
![Page 7: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Slide 7
COHORTS INCLUDE FOUR SUB-COHORTS
College-FT 26,543 38%
College-PT 22,556 32%
University-FT 13,741
20%
University-PT 6,611
10%
Total Entering Students = 69,451 in Fall 2003
![Page 8: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Slide 8
SUCCESS RATES DIFFER BY SUBCOHORT
48.4%
57.2%
28.9%
73.6%
33.6%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Su
cc
es
s R
ate
(%
)
System College Full-Time College Part-TimeUniversity Full-Time University Part-Time
Fall 2001 Success Rates in Second Spring
![Page 9: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Slide 9
SUCCESS RATE OF FALL 1997 COHORT DURING 6 YEARS FOLLOWING ENTRY:
COLLEGES FULL-TIME
6%
24%
34% 37% 38% 39%
80%
27% 8% 4% 2% 2%
2%
2%1% 1% 1%
2%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1st Spring 2nd Spring 3rd Spring 4th Spring 5th Spring 6th Spring
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredFall 1997 UG Regular
41.9%41.4%41.7%44.2%
53.7%
87.5%
![Page 10: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Slide 10
SUCCESS RATE OF FALL 1997 COHORT DURING 6 YEARS FOLLOWING ENTRY:
UNIVERSITIES FULL-TIME
0% 2% 5%13%
37%
47%
93%
67%55%
43%
18%
6%
3%
2%2%
1% 2%
3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1st Spring 2nd Spring 3rd Spring 4th Spring 5th Spring 6th Spring
Su
cc
es
s R
ate
(%
)
Graduated Retained Transferred
Fall 1997 UG Regular
62.1% 57.7% 55.5% 54.6%
71.6%
95.8%
![Page 11: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Slide 11
INCREASING RETENTION & SUCCESS RATES AFTER TWO YEARS:
COLLEGES FULL-TIME
24.2% 25.1% 23.1% 23.2% 23.0%
27.2% 27.8% 29.1% 30.4% 31.7%
2.3% 2.5% 2.7% 2.9%2.4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Fall 1997 Fall 1998 Fall 1999 Fall 2000 Fall 2001
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredUG Regular – Five Cohorts Rate at Second Spring
53.7% 55.1% 54.8% 56.3% 57.6%
![Page 12: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Slide 12
INCREASING RETENTION & SUCCESS RATES AFTER TWO YEARS:
UNIVERSITIES FULL-TIME
2.4% 1.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4%
66.7% 68.0% 69.6% 69.0% 69.1%
2.9% 2.6% 3.2% 3.7%2.5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Fall 1997 Fall 1998 Fall 1999 Fall 2000 Fall 2001
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredUG Regular – Five Cohorts Rate at Second Spring
71.6% 72.1% 72.4% 72.4% 73.2%
![Page 13: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Slide 13
SUBSTANTIAL UNKNOWN RACE-ETHNICITY
White 18,088 88%
Students of Color
2,104 10%
Non-Resident 362 2%
Total FT UG Regular = 28,427 in Fall 2001
Unknown 7,873 28%
Known Race-
Ethnicity 20,554 72%
![Page 14: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Slide 14
STUDENTS OF COLOR
American Indian 318
15%
Asian 611 29%
Black or African
American 864 41%
Hispanic 311 15%
Total FT UG Regular Students of Color = 2,104 in Fall 2001
![Page 15: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Slide 15
SUCCESS RATES VARY BY RACIAL-ETHNIC GROUP
COLLEGE FULL-TIME
23.0%12.3% 12.0% 7.1%
18.3%27.2%
16.6%
31.7%
27.5%
46.3%
36.4%
31.3%
31.6%
29.1%
3.0%
1.8%
5.1%4.4%
2.6%
3.5%
2.9%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Total Am.Indian
Asian Black Hispanic White Unknown
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredFall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring
57.6%
42.8%
60.1%
54.0%
61.3%
48.5% 49.2%
![Page 16: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Slide 16
SUCCESS RATES VARY BY RACIAL-ETHNIC GROUP
COLLEGE PART-TIME
5.0%0.6% 3.4% 2.7% 3.0%
6.7%3.0%
23.5%
18.8%
30.6% 30.1% 31.0%27.1%
14.5%
5.6%
2.2% 3.0% 1.5% 2.4%
3.5%
2.8%
0%
20%
40%
Total Am.Indian
Asian Black Hispanic White Unknown
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredFall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring
31.4%
25.0%
36.1% 35.5% 36.2%35.8%
21.1%
![Page 17: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Slide 17
SUCCESS RATES VARY BY RACIAL-ETHNIC GROUP UNIVERSITY FULL-TIME
0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.5%
69.1%57.1%
65.2% 60.3%66.1% 70.6% 67.0%
4.1%
3.6%2.7%
1.7%3.5% 4.1%3.7%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Total Am.Indian
Asian Black Hispanic White Unknown
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained TransferredFall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring
73.2%
61.2%
68.8% 67.8%74.5%
63.0%71.7%
![Page 18: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Slide 18
ONE-QUARTER OF FULL-TIME STUDENTS ARE LOW INCOME
LOW INCOME = PELL GRANT
College-Low Income 7,226 19%
College-Not Low Income 17,009 45%
University-Low Income
2,915 8%
University-Not Low Income
10,666 28%
Total FT Entering Students = 37,816 in Fall 2001
![Page 19: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Slide 19
SUCCESS RATES BY INCOME CATEGORY
COLLEGE FULL-TIME & PART-TIME
23.0% 21.9% 23.6%
5.0% 5.4% 5.0%
31.7% 32.5% 31.3%
23.5%
36.9%
21.2%
2.7% 3.0%
2.8%
2.8%
2.8%
2.9%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Total-FT LowIncome-FT
Not LowIncome-FT
Total-PT LowIncome-PT
Not LowIncome-PT
Su
cces
s R
ate
(%)
Graduated Retained Transferred
Fall 2001 Cohort: UG Regular - Second Spring
57.6% 57.1% 57.8%
45.1%
29.0%31.4%
![Page 20: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Slide 20
SYSTEM GRADUATION RATES ARE HIGHER THAN THOSE OF
SIMILAR INSTITUTIONS
32.1%
41.3%
24.4%
38.9%
0%
20%
40%
Public Two-Year Colleges Public Four-Year Universities
Gra
du
atio
n R
ate
(%)
Minnesota U.S.IPEDS 2001 Graduation rates
![Page 21: System Level Accountability Measures October 18, 2004](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56813095550346895d96719a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Slide 21
NEXT STEPS
• Develop contextual data for similar institutions on retention rates
• Measure 1C3: Cumulative Debt Burden of Graduates
• Measure 5B: Course Transfer