T-76.4115 Iteration Demo

Hermes Team[I1] Iteration

12.12.2006

2

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Agenda

Project status (15 min) achieving the goals of the iteration project metrics

Work results (15 min) demo

Used work practices (5 min)

3

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Background

High expectations Change in customer’s goals

Demo Development platform

Verification Criteria List view Help Option Star and Hash functions

4

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Status of the iteration’s goals

Goal 1: Develop Browser Demo OK

5

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Status of the iteration’s deliverables

QA Report OK

Requirements document OK

Test log OK

Progress report OK

6

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Realization of the tasks

Status Real Plan Diff

Project Management ok 45 hrs 40h +5 hrs

Design ok 76.5h 80h -3.5h

Programming almost 154h 210hrs -56h

Testing & QA ok 62.5 h 70h -7.5h

7

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Working hours by person

Major discrepancies: Effort estimation inaccuracies

Real Plan DiffJJRP 38 40 -2A. Salinas 80 80 0Kavuri 33 70 -39Abu 41 70 -29Zhao 71 70 1Lee 49.5 70 -20.5

Realized hours in this iteration

8

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Quality metrics I

I1 I2 TotalReported 8 - 8Closed 5 - 5Open 3 - 3

Bug metrics

High Low Medium TotalTotal open 0 1 2 3This iteration reported

1 2 5 8

High Low Medium TotalList View 0 0 2 2Conversational View

0 0 0 0

Alloy 1 3

9

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Quality metrics II

Other QA metrics unit tests Integration tests Use Case code reviews

10

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Quality assessment by components

Functional component

Coverage Quality Comments

Conversational View 3 Known bugs in text

List View 3

Data Access 2

Legend

Coverage: Quality:

0 = nothing = quality is good

1 = we looked at it = not sure

2 = we checked all functions = quality is bad

3 = it’s tested

11

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Risks IDDescription Impact Probability Risk Magnitude Actions Status

1

development policies and standards are in place, but sometimes not carefully followed 3 1 LOW

Arrange meeting with the developers SOLVED

2

Architecture design is sometimes difficult to understand to developers 3 3 MEDIUM

Architect and developers should meet face to face CONTINUOUS

3Project Roadmap has

changed 4 5 HIGH

Need to make some changes to the development SOLVED

4

Communication difficulty among team members due to language barrier, different routins of developers 4 5 HIGH

Frequest meetings, create differnt small groups SOLVED

5PM was not available for

certain periods 3 2 LOW Reasisgn tasks SOLVED

6

Testing approach is properly defined but sometimes difficult to implement 4 2 LOW

Developer and test team should work together CONTINUOUS

7Not so much experience in

similar projects 4 4 HIGH

dedicate more time to the project SOLVED

8Some delays to meet the

milestones 4 3 MEDIUM

Increase the development time SOLVED

9Team productivity is not so

high 3 3 MEDIUM

Rearrange the task of developers SOLVED

12

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Browser

Demo…

13

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Used work practices

Time reporting Time reporting according to task list

Risk management Risk log, and actions to control

Communication Weekly meetings with customer Individual meetings with developers and architect Bug Reports Weekly and individual meetings

14

T-76.4115 T-76.4115 IterationIteration demo demo

Thank you