t how to ask for that next gift? - blackbaud · how to ask for that next gift? page bullington, ......
TRANSCRIPT
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 1
T
HOW TO ASK FOR THAT NEXT GIFT?
Page Bullington, M.P.A
andKristin Ludwig, PhD
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 2
• Common Terms
• Annual Fund Best Practices
• Major and Planned Giving Tips and Tricks
• Prospect Research 101
• Toolbox Review
AGENDA
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 5
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS:
• Contact – a face to face visit (also known as a “Primary Move”);
significant phone call conversation with forward movement in the
relationship (also a Primary Move); one-to-one email exchange that
leads to forward movement .
• Actions – are recorded in the “Action Tab” in RE and are considered
“Secondary Moves” which may include a phone call to set up or
confirm an appointment, or a chance meeting where you had a
conversation.
• Visit – a face to face visit
• Suspects – constituents who have been identified by Research as
possible major gift prospects for assignment to gift officer prospect
pools. Once assigned to a portfolio these are called “Prospects”.
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 6
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS:
• Prospects – individuals who have been assigned to a gift officer to
be qualified and moved into cultivation and then forward.
• Qualification – occurs during the “Assessment” stage. Includes
review of data and visiting with individual to determine if he/she is a
valid candidate for solicitation at the major gift level. In this stage an
individual is either “qualified” and moved into “cultivation” or
removed from the portfolio. An “action” should be filed in either
case. A “Solicitation Plan” should be filed within 60 days of having
qualified the prospect. (see below)
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 7
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS:
• Move – a strategic and substantial personalized interaction with a
prospect which directly and tangibly advances that prospect
towards an ask or a close. It can be a personal meeting or visit
(preferred), telephone conversation, email or letter. It is not casual
interaction at an event or a casual update meeting, phone call or
email.
• Solicitation Plan – filed in proposal notes in RE, this should
include a description of the purpose of the gift, the dollar amount
(“Expected Ask”) and an approximate deadline for making the ask
(“Ask Date”). The solicitation plan may be modified or edited as
needed going forward with explanatory information entered in
“Notes” on the Solicitation Plan.
• Pipeline – the concept of moving a constituent through various
stages to an ultimate closing of a gift and post-gift stewardship.
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 8
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS:
“Pipeline Movement” includes:
• ID Suspect
• ID Prospect
• Assessment
• Cultivation
• Solicitation
• Gift closure
• Post-gift stewardship
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 9
PROCESS FLOWIdentification
Prospect is identified for further research
ASSESSEMENT
The prospect is being qualified as a major gift prospect.
This results in the prospect being QUALIFIED (an action is filed to
reflect this) and moved into CULTIVATION or REMOVED
from the portfolio.
CULTIVATION
During this stage, a solicitation plan is
created and entered into RE7.
REMOVED
Prospect indicates no interest or financial capacity
to make a major gift. Removed from portfolio.
SOLICITATION
The ask is made.
The ask is rejected, the
proposal will be
re-evaluated and the
prospect is put back into
CULITVATION
SUCCESS
The prospect agrees to the
proposal and
makes a gift or pledge.
STEWARDSHIP
The prospect is moved into stewardship. After a time, it
may be determined that the prospect is ready to move
back into CULTIVATION to start the process over with a
new proposal.
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 11
ANNUAL FUND
• RFM is a method used for analyzing behavior and defining market.
It is commonly used in database marketing and direct marketing.
RFM analysis can work in tandem with reporting you already do.
• RFM stands for
• Recency - When was the donation?
• Frequency - How many donations have been made?
• Monetary Value - What is the value of donations?
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 12
ANNUAL FUND
• To create an RFM analysis, create categories for each attribute.
• Example:
• Recency attribute might be broken into three categories:
• Donors with donations within the last fiscal year
• Donors with donations last two fiscal years
• Donors with donations last three fiscal years
• Frequency might be broken into two categories:
• Donors with monthly gifts
• Donors with yearly gifts
• Value can be segmented at many levels:
• $1-$50
• $51-$100
• $101-$250, etc.
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 13
ANNUAL FUND
• Once each of the attributes has appropriate categories defined,
segments are created from the intersection of the values.
• If there were three categories for each attribute, then the resulting
matrix would have twenty-seven possible combinations
• We may also decide to collapse certain sub-segments. If the
gradations appear too small to be useful.
• The resulting segments can be ordered from most valuable (highest
recency, frequency, and value) to least valuable (lowest recency,
frequency, and marketing).
• It is highly recommended that secondary data be applied when
looking at RFM analysis.
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 14
ANNUAL FUND TO MAJOR
• One of the best tools will be trend analysis
• Review trends that occur in several ways
• Pull data on $25 donors –
• Look for common constituency codes
• Look for events occurring before gifts
• Monitor successful solicitation
• Pull data on specific constituency codes
• Do all alumni typically give a $25 gift first or is it $50
• Reviewing data in this manner can help with both major and annual
gifts
• Establish “trigger” amounts or events that can help move individuals
into major gift cultivation and / or research
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 16
METRICS FOR EVALUATION
• The level of activity and success are the best indicators of the
value of major gift officers.
• Activity may be assessed in terms of visits, solicitations,
qualifications, active movement of all portfolio prospects.
• Success is assessed in terms of movement within a portfolio. As
suspects are qualified and moved down the pipeline to closing of a
major gift. All prospects should be moved forward within 90-120
days (3-6 months) of receipt into the portfolio
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 17
METRICS FOR EVALUATION
• Initial qualification of suspect pool may take about 90-120 days and
a clear move forward should occur every 3 months for each
prospect. Once the qualified prospect pool is determined, active
cultivation and solicitation are the next steps.
• Number of qualified prospects in a portfolio may range from 30-50;
the entire portfolio (including those being qualified) may range from
100-125
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 18
METRICS FOR EVALUATION
• Reasonable Goals include:
• A minimum of 12 visits per month for assessment and/or
cultivation (130 annually) (This factors in vacation, holidays,
etc.)
• Add five new prospects to the portfolio through officer
discovery and identification
• Remove unqualified prospects each month through
assessment.
• Contact reports should be filed within 5 business days of the
contact. The 15th of the month is the deadline for the previous
month’s contact reports
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 19
RESOURCES TO SUPPORT THE MGO
• Prospect Research Team – brief, profiles, wealth analysis, gift
capacity ratings, prospect screenings, prospect identification,
prospect management reports and moves management training
CRM
• Database Team – query support and training; biographical data
updating; targeted mailing lists
• Director of Development – strategic portfolio planning; trouble
shooting and coordination of multiple contact situations; monthly
review of portfolio activity
• Executive Director – strategic planning and solutions with
operational perspective to ensure adequate infrastructure support
and compliance with policies and procedures.
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 20
PROSPECT MANAGEMENT MEETINGS
• Meeting length
• Optimum is 60 minutes
• No good work happens after 90 minutes
• Frequency
• Depends on need for new prospects
• When demand is high, meet weekly
• As prospect portfolios fill out, reduce frequency
• No less than monthly
• Roles
• Moderator keeps the meeting moving
• Note taker records minutes and distributes them by the
beginning of the next business day
• Roles can rotate
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 21
PRINCIPLES OF PROSPECT MANAGEMENT
• Clearance system managed by director of prospect management
• Clear and specific procedures and criteria for establishing an
assignment
• Assignment to a development area is driven by donor interest
• One prospect manager per prospect
• Prospect research establishes potential and inclination
• Prospect manager qualifies the prospect
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 22
PRINCIPLES OF PROSPECT MANAGEMENT
• Prospect managers can nominate prospects on their own, but
assignment must be validated by director of prospect management
• Prospect manager controls and monitors contact with the prospect
• Solicitors may be other than prospect manager
• Meaningful reports
• Assigned prospects
• System for succession of assignments
• Contact reports are mandatory
• Clear definitions of “moves”
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 23
RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT BENCHMARKS
• To assist in prospect management, below are some national relationship
management benchmarks:
• 20-30 moves per month
• 10 – 18 face-to-face visits per month
• Portfolio size: 150 – 200 prospects
• Identification – 25%
• Cultivation – 50%
• Solicitation – 25%
• Portfolio size influenced by
• Ask amount
• Geography
• Job responsibilities
• Annual or semi-annual review with supervisor
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 25
PASSING IT ALONG – SAMPLE PROFILE
06/09/2011 Bullington & Ludwig 26
PASSING IT ALONG
• Other information to include…
• Charitable giving
• Frequency of giving – to your organization and other non-profits
• Average gift size
• Current relationships
• Alumni, Membership Status
• Peer relationships
• Think about what is important for your team