targeting epigenetic dysregulation in bladder cancer through … · ezh2 eed suz12 enhancer tss...
TRANSCRIPT
CDKN1C
ZNF467
FXYD6
NES
B
C
Targeting epigenetic dysregulation in bladder cancer through inhibition of EZH2Patricia J. Keller, Rosana Meyer, Feng Zhao, Linlin Ma, Emily Greenwald, Xinwei Han, Andrew Conery, Jennifer A. Mertz, and Patrick Trojer
Constellation Pharmaceuticals, 215 First Street, Cambridge, MA, USA 02142
EZH2EED
SUZ12
Enhancer TSS
H3K27me3
Abstract #A18
Conclusions
0.001 0.01 0.1 10
50
100
150
CPI-0209, µM
Rela
tive
Cell
Viab
ility
(%)
0.01 0.1 1 100
50
100
150
CPI-0209, µM
Rela
tive
Cell
Viab
ility
(%)
Day 6Day 12Day 18
0.001 0.01 0.1 10
50
100
150
CPI-0209, µM
Rela
tive
Cell
Viab
ility
(%)
0.0001 0.01 1 100 100000
50
100
150
HT1376
CPI-0209, nM
Ratio
H3K
27m
e3/H
3(%
)
0.0001 0.01 1 100 100000
50
100
150
HT1197
CPI-0209, nM
Ratio
H3K
27m
e3/H
3(%
)
0.0001 0.01 1 100 100000
50
100
150
T24
CPI-0209, nM
Ratio
H3K
27m
e3/H
3(%
)
0 10 20 300
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
HT1376 xenograft:tumor growth curve
days post grouping
Tum
or v
olum
e (m
m3 )
30%TGI
47%TGI
98%TGI82%TGI
0 10 20 30-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
HT1376 xenograft:body weight
days post grouping
Bod
y w
eigh
t (%
cha
nge)
Day 12 Day 310
10
20
30
40
50
HT1376 xenograft:tumor pharmacodynamic marker
Ratio
of H
3K27
me3
/H3(
%)
Vehicle10 mg/kg25 mg/kg75 mg/kg150 mg/kg
A
A
B
A B A
B
A. Biochemical selectivity panel with CPI-0209. B. H3K27me3 mark reduction. C. Maintenance of H3K27me3 mark reduction after washout. D. Efficacy, PK and PD in Karpas-422 xenograft.
References1. Kleer CG, et al. Proc Nat Acad Sci (2003) 100:116060-11611 3. Weikert S, et al. Int J Mol Med (2005) 16: 349-353 5. Robertson AG, et al. Cell (2017) 171: 540-556 2. Varambally S, et al. Nature (2002) 419:624-629 4. TCGA, Nature (2014) 507: 315-322 6. Bitler B, et al. Nature Med (2015) 21: 231-238
EZH2 is the catalytic subunit of the PRC2 complex, which methylates histone H3 to generate the transcriptionally repressive trimethylated modification state H3K27me3.
In cancers, EZH2 is mutated in hematologic malignancies and is frequently overexpressed in solid tumors, where its expression often correlates with poor prognosis due to repression of key tumor suppressors, and genes controlling cell fate and apoptosis (1-3).
Bladder cancers have frequent mutations in chromatin modifiers indicating that dysregulation of chromatin regulatory cues promotes tumor progression. Up to 89% of tumors have alterations in at least one histone modifier encoding gene, and 64% have alterations in components of the SWI/SNF (also known as BAF) chromatin remodeling complex (4,5).
Loss of function mutations in ARID1A (a SWI/SNF component) have been shown to create a dependence on EZH2 in ovarian clear cell carcinomas. ARID1A is mutated in 25% of muscle-invasive bladder cancers but it is unclear ARID1A mutations result in EZH2-dependence in bladder cancer (BLCA) (4-6).
Several first generation EZH2 inhibitors (CPI-1205, GSK126, Tazemetostat) are currently in clinical development. We have developed CPI-0209 as our second generation EZH2 inhibitor with enhanced potency in vitro and in vivo in models of both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors.
●
●
●
●
●
0 100 200 300
TSC1TSC1
ASXL2ERCC2ERBB3
ELF3MLL
CREBBPSPTAN1
FAT1FGFR3ERBB2
ATMEP300
STAG2RB1
PIK3CA
KDM6AMLL2TP53
TCGA Bladder Cancer Data
number of mutations
Synin frame INDEL
Splice SiteFrameshiftNonsense
Missense
ARID1AARID1A mutations:25% of 412 cases47% are Nonsense
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10ASH1LDNMT1
DNMT3aDNMT3b
DNMT3b/3LDOT1L
G9aGLP
MLL1 ComplexMLL2 ComplexMLL3 ComplexMLL4 Complex
NSD1NSD2
NSD2 (E1099K)NSD2 (T1150A)
NSD3PRDM9PRMT1PRMT3PRMT4
PRMT5(C449S)/MEP50 ComplexPRMT5/MEP50 Complex
PRMT6PRMT7PRMT8
SET1b ComplexSET7/9
SET8SETD2SMYD2SMYD3
SUV39H1SUV39H2
SUV420H1TV2
CPI-0209 IC50, [µM]
EZH2 (Y641F) ComplexEZH2 ComplexEZH1 Complex
DM
SO
CP
I-020
9Ta
zem
etos
tat
DM
SO
CP
I-020
9Ta
zem
etos
tat
DM
SO
CP
I-020
9Ta
zem
etos
tat
H3K27me3 EZH2 Total H3
Treated 96 hr
+ Washout 24 hr
+ Washout 48 hr
+ Washout 72 hr
C
D
0
10
20
30
40
Rat
io o
f H3K
27m
e3/H
3 (%
)
VehicleCPI-0209 25mg/kg, PO, QDTazemetostat 25 mg/kg, PO, QDTazemetostat 160 mg/kg, PO, BID
MSD ELISA
0.0001 0.01 10
50
100
150
HeLa cells:Cellular target engagement assay
Dose (µM)
Rat
io o
f H3K
27m
e3/H
3 (%
)
CPI-0209Tazemetostat
EC50:0.68 nM23.4 nM
Ovarian Cancer cell line panel
A. 18-day phenotypic assay GI50 values with an earlier 2nd Gen compound in OVCA lines (left) and CPI-0209 in BLCA lines (right). B. Representative data from 3 BLCA lines (2 ARID1Amut).
MSD ELISA
18-dayViability
CellCycle
EC50:0.147 nM
EC50:0.111 nM
EC50:0.392 nM
GI50:0.012 µM
GI50:0.003 µM
GI50:5.9 µM
Bladder Cancer cell line panel
Log2FC
HT1
376
SW78
0VM
CU
B1KU
1919
TCC
SUP
639V
T24
0 1 3.5
A. Heatmap of 90 genes upregulated in at least 4/7 BLCA cell lines after 4 days treatment with 250 nM CPI-0209. B. Time and dose-dependent upregulation of EZH2 target genes.
CPI-0209 is a potent and selective EZH2 inhibitor
Background EZH2 inhibition preferentially affects ARID1Amut bladder cancer cell models
B
A
Day 14 Day 640
5
10
15
20
25
HT1197 xenograft:tumor pharmacodynamic marker
atio
of H
3K27
me3
/H3
(%)
Vehicle75 mg/kg
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
500
1000
1500
HT1197 xenograft:tumor growth curve
days post grouping
Tum
or V
olum
e (m
m3)
82%TGI
0 10 20 30 40 50 60-20
-10
0
10
20
HT1197 xenograft:body weight
days post grouping
Body
wei
ght (
% c
hang
e)
Veh 10 25 75 1500
2
4
6
8 CDKN1C
fold
exp
ress
ion
mg/kg, PO, QD
Veh 10 25 75 1500
2
4
6
8 NES
fold
exp
ress
ion
mg/kg, PO, QD
Veh 10 25 75 1500
5
10
15 ZNF467
fold
exp
ress
ion
mg/kg, PO, QD
Veh 10 25 75 1500
20
40
60
80 FXYD6
fold
exp
ress
ion
mg/kg, PO, QD
C
CPI-0209 causes tumor regression in ARID1A mutant bladder cancer xenografts and is more efficacious than cisplatin single agent treatment
Conclusions
A. Viability and B. SubG1 effects after 7-days pre-treatment with CPI-0209 and 5-days combination treatment with cisplatin in vitro. C. Relative tumor growth for combination.
CPI-0209 is a highly potent inhibitor of EZH2, with 3-day EC50 values for cellular reduction of global H3K27me3 levels of 0.1-0.5 nM across a range of bladder cancer cell lines.
Bladder cancer cell lines harboring ARID1A mutations are preferentially sensitive to EZH2 inhibition, resulting in time- and dose-dependent cell growth inhibition that correlates with an increase in cell death.
Gene expression analysis after CPI-0209 treatment shows predominant upregulation of gene expression after 4 days of high-dose treatment. Selected genes show dose- and time-dependent upregulation in response to CPI-0209.
CPI-0209 is effective in causing tumor regression in two ARID1A mutant bladder cancer xenograft models and outperforms the standard of care chemotherapeutic cisplatin as a single agent.
Combination treatment of CPI-0209 with cisplatin enhances cell death in vitro and leads to enhanced tumor regression in vivo at well-tolerated doses.
This data supports the rationale for the development of CPI-0209 in patients with bladder cancer as a monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents. The presence of ARID1A mutations may correlate with increased responsiveness to CPI-0209 treatment.
●
●
●
●
●
●
CPI-0209 combines with cisplatin to enhance inhibition of BLCA cell growthCPI-0209 treatment leads to upregulation of EZH2 target genes
ARID1Amut ARID1Amut ARID1AWT
Gene induction at day 12
CPI-0209PO, QD
CPI-0209PO, QD
0 10 20 30-20
-10
0
10
HT1376 xenograft:body weight
days post grouping
body
wei
ght (
% c
hang
e)
0 10 20 300
500
1000
1500
HT1376 xenograft:tumor growth curve
days post grouping
rela
tive
tum
or v
olum
e(%
cha
nge)
82%TGI
54%TGI52%TGI
Vehicle75 mg/kg CPI-02092 mg/kg cisplatin4 mg/kg cisplatin
CPI-0209PO, QD
CisplatinIV, QW
CPI-0209sensitive
non-sensitive
0 10 20 30 40 500
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Karpas-422 Lymphoma xenograft:tumor growth curve
days post grouping
Tum
or V
olum
e (m
m3)
VehicleCPI-0209 25 mg/kg, PO, QDTazemetostat 25 mg/kg PO, QDTazemetostat 160 mg/kg, PO, BID
Karpas-422 Lymphoma xenograft:plasma and tumor PK
Karpas-422 Lymphoma xenograft:tumor pharmacodynamic marker
HT11
97SW
780
HT13
76TC
CSU
PVM
CUB
1K
U191
964
7V T24
SW17
10JM
SU1
639V RT4
RT11
2SC
aBER J8
2Ca
l29
BFTC
905
639V
UMUC
356
37BC
3CKM
BC20.000
0.025
0.050
5
10
CPI-0
209
GI 50
,µM
ARID1A mutantARID1A WT
TOV1
12D
A278
0
TOV2
1G
CAO
V3
OVM
ANA
OV5
6
NIH
OVC
AR3
OA
W42
OVI
SE
SKO
V3
OVT
OKO OV7
CAO
V4 ES2
OV9
0
RM
G10.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
2nd
Gen
GI 50
,µM
ARID1A mutantARID1A WT
D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250
01234
10
20
30CDKN1C
fold
exp
ress
ion
CPI-0209 (nM)
D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250
012345
255075
100125
FXYD6
fold
exp
ress
ion
CPI-0209 (nM)
D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250
012345
10
20
30
40NES
fold
exp
ress
ion
CPI-0209 (nM)
D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250 D 0.4 2 10 50 250
012345
10
15
20
25ZNF467
fold
exp
ress
ion
CPI-0209, nM
1 day2 days
3 days4 days
D 0.004 0.008 0.016 0.031 0.063 0.125 0.25 0.5 10
50
100
CPI-0209, µM
% o
f tot
al
D 0.004 0.008 0.016 0.031 0.063 0.125 0.25 0.5 10
50
100
CPI-0209,µM
% o
f tot
al
D 0.039 0.078 0.156 0.313 0.625 1.25 2.5 5 100
50
100
CPI-0209,µM
% o
f tot
al
subG1G1SG2/M
Dosing end
Plasma D1 Plasma D12 Tumor D12100
1000
10000
100000
Plas
ma
(ng/
ml)
and
tum
or (n
g/g)
CPI-0209 25mg/kg QDTazemetostat 25 mg/kg QDTazemetostat 160 mg/kg BID
0.001 0.01 0.10
25
50
75
100 HT1376 SubG1
CPI-0209, µM
% s
ubG
1 in
crea
se
CPI-0209+ 0.123 µM+ 0.37 µM+ 1.1 µM+ 3.3 µM+ 10 µM
Cisplatin
0
25
50
75
100
Rela
tive
Cel
l Via
bilit
y(%
)
1.1 µMCisplatin
0.016 µMCPI-0209 Combo
0
25
50
75
100
% s
ubG
1 in
crea
se
1.1 µMCisplatin
0.016 µMCPI-0209 Combo
0.001 0.01 0.10
50
100
150 HT1376 viability
CPI-0209, µM
Rel
ativ
e Ce
ll Vi
abili
ty(%
) CPI-0209+ 0.123 µM+ 0.37 µM+ 1.1 µM+ 3.3 µM+ 10 µM
Cisplatin
HT1376 SubG1
HT1376 viability
Vehicle Cisplatin
+ CPI-0209
Vehicle CPI-0209
Vehicle Cisplatin
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 450
500
1000
1500
2000
days post grouping
rela
tive
tum
or v
olum
e(%
cha
nge)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 450
500
1000
1500
2000
days post grouping
rela
tive
tum
or v
olum
e(%
cha
nge)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 450
500
1000
1500
2000
days post grouping
rela
tive
tum
or v
olum
e(%
cha
nge)
HT1376 xenograft: tumor growth curve
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45-10
-5
0
5
10
15
days post grouping
body
wei
ght (
% c
hang
e)
VehicleCisplatin 1.5 mg/kgCPI-0209 35 mg/kgCisplatin + CPI-0209
HT1376 xenograft: body weight
CPI-0209PO, QD
CisplatinIV, QW
+ Washout 96 hr
Upregulated in 7/7 lines
Upregulated in 6/7 lines
Upregulated in 4/7 or 5/7
lines